Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: TrueGrit on June 20, 2009, 03:33:13 PM

Title: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: TrueGrit on June 20, 2009, 03:33:13 PM
Serious question broskies, do you ever get tired of this same fucking argument? The amount of time and energy you've now put into your muscleman feud must have taken a serious chunk out of your short time on this planet.

Is it worth it when it's clear that you've never changed each other's minds and most people leave threads when you start bickering?

Have you thought of meeting at a hotel or something for a weekend conference?

Will you start posting naked pics of Dorian and Ronnie now?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: tendonitis on June 20, 2009, 03:39:08 PM
i think ND and Hulkster should be required to post the mandatory poses and Ronnie and Dorian should judge them

Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: johnnynoname on June 20, 2009, 04:05:03 PM
do they realize they are arguing about which oiled up man looks better,right?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 04:06:00 PM
Serious question broskies, do you ever get tired of this same fucking argument? The amount of time and energy you've now put into your muscleman feud must have taken a serious chunk out of your short time on this planet.

Is it worth it when it's clear that you've never changed each other's minds and most people leave threads when you start bickering?

Have you thought of meeting at a hotel or something for a weekend conference?

Will you start posting naked pics of Dorian and Ronnie now?

It is sickening hence why I offered a Truce , which he declined and got his ass kicked in , I won and walked away , now he's a bitter he trolls every single thread with me in it or the name Dorian Yates , he's a one trick pony. He's an angry guy because I beat him using his own hero and now all he does it troll

Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: ironneck on June 20, 2009, 04:46:51 PM
i still don't get it cause ronnie owns yates
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: pumpster on June 20, 2009, 04:48:48 PM
i still don't get it cause ronnie owns yates

Kinda obvious innit?

It all makes sense once the schmoe factor's considered-ND has no life other than collecting. obsessing over and posting white BB pics on getbig AND an embarassing number of other BB sites.  :-*

You might too, if you were an assistant at a flower shop with a lot of free time. At least 2 mexicans are reporting to him. ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on June 20, 2009, 05:06:54 PM
It is sickening hence why I offered a Truce , which he declined and got his ass kicked in , I won and walked away , now he's a bitter he trolls every single thread with me in it or the name Dorian Yates , he's a one trick pony. He's an angry guy because I beat him using his own hero and now all he does it troll



are you trying to say that dorian was better than nasser in the FDB pose?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 05:07:09 PM
i still don't get it cause ronnie owns yates

ha ha ha Ronnie disagrees , thanks for playing though.  ;D
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 05:08:59 PM
Kinda obvious innit?

It all makes sense once the schmoe factor's considered-ND has no life other than collecting. obsessing over and posting white BB pics on getbig AND an embarassing number of other BB sites.  :-*

You might too, if you were an assistant at a flower shop with a lot of free time. At least 2 mexicans are reporting to him. ;)

Thanks for proving my point troll  ;) still pissed I outed you as a tranny chaser huh? it's ironic you're questioning anyone's sexuality seeing it's you who refers to men who dress like women as ' gorgeous '

I own you for perpetuity
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: pumpster on June 20, 2009, 05:16:18 PM
Thanks for proving my point troll  ;) still pissed I outed you as a tranny chaser huh? it's ironic you're questioning anyone's sexuality seeing it's you who refers to men who dress like women as ' gorgeous '

I own you for perpetuity

Case in point, there's not much room in the trailer that's far from the pc or BB posters ROFL
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 05:18:41 PM
Quote
You might too, if you were an assistant at a flower shop with a lot of free time. At least 2 mexicans are reporting to him.

hahahahaha

classic!
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 05:19:18 PM
i still don't get it cause ronnie owns yates

ND loves 'blocky white guys' lol so he doesn't see it..

Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 05:20:14 PM
Case in point, there's not much room in the trailer that's far from the pc or BB posters ROFL

Again YOU follow me into yet another thread , you're obsessed with me because I outed you as a tranny chasing bowflex using moron  ;D  I don't live in a trailer FYI and I don't live in a filth ridden ghetto in queens  ;) see the difference between you and I is , I don't have to make this shit up , you do  ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 05:21:26 PM
ND loves 'blocky white guys' lol so he doesn't see it..



coming from the guy who compares Ronnie's ass striations from one year to the next lol

I own you hence why you're here
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: pumpster on June 20, 2009, 05:21:31 PM
.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 05:22:35 PM
.

No this is a meltdown , when you wished me dead lmao


pumpster meltdowns nothing new  ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 05:24:50 PM
don't forget about the time ND told Neo he was going to 'drink his milkshake"

that, combined with his flowery occupation, and his love of white men gunter/dorian

makes it obvious that ND is a flamer hahahahaha

 :P
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 05:27:33 PM
don't forget about the time ND told Neo he was going to 'drink his milkshake"

that, combined with his flowery occupation, and his love of white men gunter/dorian

makes it obvious that ND is a flamer hahahahaha

 :P

Thanks for proving my point , I own you and pumpster and this is all you have left  ;) you couldn't touch me in the argument now you're reduced to ad homenin attacks lol
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Matt C on June 20, 2009, 05:44:17 PM
ND and Hulkster

I prefer Hulkster's posts.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on June 20, 2009, 05:47:11 PM
I prefer ronnie so i prefer Hulkster's posts.

fixed ;D
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: suckmymuscle on June 20, 2009, 06:59:37 PM
Serious question broskies, do you ever get tired of this same fucking argument? The amount of time and energy you've now put into your muscleman feud must have taken a serious chunk out of your short time on this planet.

Is it worth it when it's clear that you've never changed each other's minds and most people leave threads when you start bickering?

Have you thought of meeting at a hotel or something for a weekend conference?

Will you start posting naked pics of Dorian and Ronnie now?

  The difference between ND and Hulkster is that ND can live with the fact that there are people in the World who think that Ronnie is better than Dorian, but Hulkster sure as hell can't deal with the fact that there are people who think that Dorian is better than Ronnie.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 07:58:35 PM
  The difference between ND and Hulkster is that ND can live with the fact that there are people in the World who think that Ronnie is better than Dorian, but Hulkster sure as hell can't deal with the fact that there are people who think that Dorian is better than Ronnie.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Ha ha ha great post ! because it's true .
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 07:59:59 PM
the difference between ND and Hulkster is that ND works with flowers for a living, and Hulkster doesn't LOL

 :P
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 08:03:56 PM
the difference between ND and Hulkster is Hulkster praised ND's intelligence and ND never did
 :P

 ;)

I could collect cans and I still know more about competitive bodybuilding than you , one has absolutely nothing to do with the other , you keep bringing this up as if it's a negative NOBODY cares except you and why? because I kicked your ass and this is all you have to cling onto  ;)



Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 08:05:26 PM
Quote
I could collect cans and I still know more about competitive bodybuilding than you

but you don't so it doesn't matter what you do for a living - your still as delusional as ever.

but your flowery occupation does indicate your sexual prefernce (blocky white guys) LOL
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 20, 2009, 08:10:01 PM
but you don't so it doesn't matter what you do for a living - your still as delusional as ever.

but your flowery occupation does indicate your sexual prefernce (blocky white guys) LOL

coming from the guy who claimed Ronnie has more detailed calves than Dorian , and the guy who said Yates lost in 1993 to Flex and Ronnie dominated in 2001 bu losing the whole prejudging lmao I know 100 times more than you on the subject case closed , hell you didn't know all rounds are physique rounds

my occupation is totally irrelevant but you need an angle to attack because you can't defend your position , even Ronnie doesn't agree with you  ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 08:17:06 PM
every time you post that stuff I roll my eyes,

because:

1. once the 93 video/pics came out, it was quite clear that flex was off his AC shape, and didn't deserve to win. I changed my opinion. it went right over your flowery head as always.. ::)

2. Ronnie did have very detailed calves in 99 - watch the video. they had no size and shitty shape, but they had more detail than dorian shows in most shots

3. ronnie dominated the prejudging in reality but lost on paper - the judges fucked up. see pics flowerboy. ::)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 08:20:45 PM
shitty size. shitty shape. but there is a hell of a lot of detail there:
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 08:21:42 PM
^
man ronnie's glutes, hams and calves make dorian's whole lower body look soft.. :o

no big suprise there, of course.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: clued-up on June 20, 2009, 08:34:37 PM
Serious question broskies, do you ever get tired of this same fucking argument?

silly question. if they tired of arguing they'd stop. they complete each other.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: England_1 on June 20, 2009, 08:48:24 PM


3. ronnie dominated the prejudging in reality but lost on paper - the judges fucked up. see pics flowerboy. ::)

LMFAO...everytime Ronnie loses it's the judges fault. Right  ::) Jay won in 2001. Face it.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: pumpster on June 20, 2009, 08:50:26 PM
LMFAO...everytime Ronnie loses it's the judges fault. Right  ::) Jay won in 2001. Face it.

The Columbu of the 90s "won" a boatload of gimmies thanks to uncle joe. It wasn't close like 01, the barrel lost except where it counted-between joe's knees. Something tells me ND's always been envious of that view. :-*
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: England_1 on June 20, 2009, 09:15:39 PM
The Columbu of the 90s "won" a boatload of gimmies thanks to uncle joe. It wasn't close like 01, the barrel lost except where it counted-between joe's knees. Something tells me ND's always been envious of that view. :-*

Yates owns your mental midget mind  :-*
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 21, 2009, 05:50:35 AM
every time you post that stuff I roll my eyes,

because:

1. once the 93 video/pics came out, it was quite clear that flex was off his AC shape, and didn't deserve to win. I changed my opinion. it went right over your flowery head as always.. ::)

2. Ronnie did have very detailed calves in 99 - watch the video. they had no size and shitty shape, but they had more detail than dorian shows in most shots

3. ronnie dominated the prejudging in reality but lost on paper - the judges fucked up. see pics flowerboy. ::)

1) pics and video of 1993 Olympia were out LONG before you mad you're retarded claim in fact I scanned 5 different magazines coverage of the contest and posted them long before after looking at the pics you decided Dorian lost to Flex and only after taken a beating to you amend your opinion


2) more detail I still always laugh at that once of your most retarded statements , this my dim witted friend doesn't merit a response , enough said


3) once again you're in direct opposition with reality , only your pure ignorance on how bodybuilding contests are judged can permit you to claim hes dominating , all you can do is type ' see pics ' I've seen all the pics and video and Jay is soundly beating Ronnie in the prejudging and Ronnie is in no way shape or form ' dominating ' go learn what the word oxymoron means , one doesn't dominate by losing . you're always contradicting reality it must suck to have to constantly make excuses lol

1998 wasn't a close contest ( Hulkster's fantasy ) reality it was extremely close in fact one of the closest contests in history 3 points

reality owns you
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on June 21, 2009, 05:54:39 AM
lmao at this thread

Here we go again!
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Immortal_Technique on June 21, 2009, 06:07:26 AM
Hahaha I just pissed my pants when I saw this thread turn into another massive argument hahahaahahah
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 07:15:53 AM
Quote
1998 wasn't a close contest ( Hulkster's fantasy ) reality it was extremely close in fact one of the closest contests in history 3 points

you keep going back to the scoresheet as if the scoresheet was an accurate reflection of what was seen onstage.

it wasn't:

see for yourself: ::)

Flex gets owned in every shot.

sorry.

ps what is your excuse going to be this time?  ::)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Vorkosigan on June 21, 2009, 07:48:25 AM
Serious question broskies, do you ever get tired of this same fucking argument? The amount of time and energy you've now put into your muscleman feud must have taken a serious chunk out of your short time on this planet.

Is it worth it when it's clear that you've never changed each other's minds and most people leave threads when you start bickering?

Have you thought of meeting at a hotel or something for a weekend conference?

Will you start posting naked pics of Dorian and Ronnie now?
I guess you have your answer
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 21, 2009, 08:17:45 AM
you keep going back to the scoresheet as if the scoresheet was an accurate reflection of what was seen onstage.

it wasn't:

see for yourself: ::)

Flex gets owned in every shot.

sorry.

ps what is your excuse going to be this time?  ::)

yeah because contests are judged on a scoring system , in your magical world Ronnie dominated 1998 , he's better conditioned than 01 ASC and 10 pounds bigger in 99 despite it not being his best showing , Dorian lost in 93 to Flex , Ronnie has more detailed calves than Dorian any year , Dorian was the most overrated bodybuilder in history , Ronnie was grainer than Dorian ever was lol

you live in a magical place kid , I roam in reality you should try it some time  ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: The Ugly on June 21, 2009, 08:21:41 AM
So let's settle this then, once and for all: Ronnie or Dorian?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 10:51:27 AM
Quote
he's better conditioned than 01 ASC and 10 pounds bigger in 99 despite it not being his best showing

 many people agree that it is his best showing.

look around whenever pics are posted.

the comments are all the same: ronnie's 99 presentation was his best overall look..

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php/99-coleman-everyone-else-4268.html?t=4268

Quote
In my mind ,thats Ronnies best ever shape.

Quote
the 99 RC is the best physique to ever step onstage

Quote
99= Ronnies best ever

McGough disagrees's, although he feels it is better than 98 (check the article he wrote that you hate)

etc..

you can't escape the reality of how good people feel Ronnie 99 was..
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 10:53:46 AM
Quote
99 he looked the best IMO.

Quote
Ronnie's best ever

etc.

fact is Flowerboy, the majority of people in the industry, when reminded of how he looked in 99 all say the same:

it was his best ever shape.

esp. since he was 10 pounds bigger than the AC..

 :P
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 10:57:03 AM
this is so damn easy:

Quote
99-the best ever ronnie

Quote
99 Ronnie Coleman... thge greatest EVER!!! COLEMAN 1999>ANYBODY!!!

but no, ND claims it is only I who feels 99 ronnie was his best ever shape

LMAO

no wonder you cant advance above flowers in life LOL

Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: The Ugly on June 21, 2009, 11:03:10 AM
ND, your response?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 11:15:27 AM
ND, your response?

he'll post quotes without posting any sort of corroborating proof.

thats what he doesnt get. quotes without pics/vids to back them up are useless..

what good is a quote from Ronnie or McGough saying that 98 (or whatever) was his best shape if all the pics and videos show this to be WRONG?
 ::)

99 was his best look overall.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 11:21:12 AM
he looked great at the AC, but he was virtually the same (only bigger) at the 99 Olympia:

all the quotes in the world wont refute real life:

real life is the tiebreaker between bullshit and reality:
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 11:22:38 AM
more proof as to why so many feel ronnie 99 was his best:
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 11:26:57 AM
as you can see, Ronnie was virtually just as cut in 99 was he was at the AC

but he was 10 pounds bigger.

if you just looked at the bullshit ND posts, you would think he was 309 pounds overweight and soft in 99 compared to the AC

 ::)

thank god we have pics and videos to refute misinformed opinions..be they Ronnie, ND or McGough..
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: pumpster on June 21, 2009, 11:31:05 AM
This winning reality can't be adequately conveyed by words.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 12:01:46 PM
ronnie was hard as nails in 1999, and 257 pounds to boot:
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: TrueGrit on June 21, 2009, 12:06:21 PM
they complete each other.

This is why I suggested they book a weekend together at a motel
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: The Ugly on June 21, 2009, 01:11:25 PM
he'll post quotes without posting any sort of corroborating proof.

Assuming that were true, how then might you respond?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 01:16:31 PM
Assuming that were true, how then might you respond?

with visuals that refute the quotes.

real life is always the equalizer.

talk is cheap =most of it is bullshit.

you need evidence to back it up.

which ND never has...
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: The Ugly on June 21, 2009, 01:20:11 PM
with visuals that refute the quotes.

real life is always the equalizer.

talk is cheap =most of it is bullshit.

you need evidence to back it up.

which ND never has...

But ND would probably disagree. So how would go about refuting his counterpoint?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 01:27:40 PM
But ND would probably disagree. So how would go about refuting his counterpoint?

 by reminding him that he works for a flower shop LOL

 8)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: The Ugly on June 21, 2009, 01:35:14 PM
by reminding him that he works for a flower shop LOL

 8)

Perfect.

Just try to milk it for, say, 1,700 pages.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 01:37:16 PM
sounds good.

but ND usually runs away in embarassment after debating with me for any length of time.

he did so in the truce thread..
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: The Ugly on June 21, 2009, 01:38:30 PM
sounds good.

but ND usually runs away in embarassment after debating with me for any length of time.

he did so in the truce thread..

He disagreed about Ronnie being the better bodybuilder?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on June 21, 2009, 01:42:32 PM
Ronnie's wins over Dorian= 0


Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NeoSeminole on June 21, 2009, 01:52:55 PM
Ronnie's wins over Dorian= 0

Dorian's wins over a prime Ronnie = 0

thanks for playing! Try again. ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: The Ugly on June 21, 2009, 01:59:56 PM
Ronnie's wins over Dorian= 0

Hulkster, it seems there's some disagreement here. Why hasn't one of you guys just called a truce or something?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 02:03:42 PM
truces are for people that work for flower companies. 8)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Iceman1981 on June 21, 2009, 02:49:58 PM
truces are for people that work for flower companies. 8)

WTF? He does? It has to be a joke?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Ursus on June 21, 2009, 02:52:35 PM
ha ha ha Ronnie disagrees , thanks for playing though.  ;D

Ronnie is too modest to say how he owned that skinny twink
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 03:00:19 PM
WTF? He does? It has to be a joke?

sadly, it isn't.

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 04, 2009, 01:34:51 PM
Why would I lie? what do I have to hide? I could work pumping gas and I would still know more on the subject than you Hulkster , pumpster and every other Trollman fan combined and why? because I've read up extensively on the subject , and basing your knowledge on your posts it's painfully obvious none of you know the first thing about how contests are judged , what the criteria is and what judges look for . 

and to answer your question I work for one of the largest flower wholesalers on the East coast , I start at 5 a.m ( or earlier ) and I'm usually out for the day by 1 p.m so I can post during the say when most people are still working and again who can't post with a mobile device during the day? and I still only average 11 posts a day 

ND works for a flower company, probably arranging the flowers wearing pink Abercombie and Fich shirts LOL


Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Meso_z on June 21, 2009, 03:24:38 PM
Ronnie and Dorian should sue these fucktards.....they will never recover getting owned by their own heroes.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: suckmymuscle on June 21, 2009, 05:38:50 PM
ronnie was hard as nails in 1999, and 257 pounds to boot:

  Too bad about the gut. And no, he was holding water, evident in his hams and lower back. He only was shredded from the front because he has such great genetics for separations.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: suckmymuscle on June 21, 2009, 05:44:48 PM
sadly, it isn't.

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 04, 2009, 01:34:51 PM
Why would I lie? what do I have to hide? I could work pumping gas and I would still know more on the subject than you Hulkster , pumpster and every other Trollman fan combined and why? because I've read up extensively on the subject , and basing your knowledge on your posts it's painfully obvious none of you know the first thing about how contests are judged , what the criteria is and what judges look for . 

and to answer your question I work for one of the largest flower wholesalers on the East coast , I start at 5 a.m ( or earlier ) and I'm usually out for the day by 1 p.m so I can post during the say when most people are still working and again who can't post with a mobile device during the day? and I still only average 11 posts a day 

ND works for a flower company, probably arranging the flowers wearing pink Abercombie and Fich shirts LOL

  He could work as an accountant, marketing manager or as an executive at the company, which wouldn't involve doing anything that requires an expertise in flowers or flower arrangements.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 21, 2009, 05:45:59 PM
with visuals that refute the quotes.

real life is always the equalizer.

talk is cheap =most of it is bullshit.

you need evidence to back it up.

which ND never has...

evidence? Ronnie Coleman admitting he couldn't beat Dorian on multiple occasions is evidence , it ended the truce thread and started your meltdown into troll heaven  ;)

Real life Ronnie said he couldn't beat Dorian , cased closed  ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 21, 2009, 05:47:44 PM
sadly, it isn't.

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on June 04, 2009, 01:34:51 PM
Why would I lie? what do I have to hide? I could work pumping gas and I would still know more on the subject than you Hulkster , pumpster and every other Trollman fan combined and why? because I've read up extensively on the subject , and basing your knowledge on your posts it's painfully obvious none of you know the first thing about how contests are judged , what the criteria is and what judges look for . 

and to answer your question I work for one of the largest flower wholesalers on the East coast , I start at 5 a.m ( or earlier ) and I'm usually out for the day by 1 p.m so I can post during the say when most people are still working and again who can't post with a mobile device during the day? and I still only average 11 posts a day 

ND works for a flower company, probably arranging the flowers wearing pink Abercombie and Fich shirts LOL




I already told you I don't arrange flowers  ;) you think this is a slight on me and it's not , the fact you saved this meaningless post shows how desperate you are
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 21, 2009, 05:51:13 PM
  He could work as an accountant, marketing manager or as an executive at the company, which wouldn't involve doing anything that requires an expertise in flowers or flower arrangements.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

ha ha ha this kid is so desperate to try and get revenge over the beating he's taken he thinks if he attacks where I work this some how supports his argument lol textbook Hulkster , has nothing as usual

he knows I don't arrange flowers it has to lie because it's all he has , I could be homeless and I know more aboyt competitive bodybuilding than him and all his buddies combined and that's what they want to divert from , their ignorance  ;D
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 21, 2009, 05:58:56 PM
many people agree that it is his best showing.

look around whenever pics are posted.

the comments are all the same: ronnie's 99 presentation was his best overall look..

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php/99-coleman-everyone-else-4268.html?t=4268

McGough disagrees's, although he feels it is better than 98 (check the article he wrote that you hate)

etc..

you can't escape the reality of how good people feel Ronnie 99 was..

Ha ha ha ha fan-bot meltdown who cares how many idiot fan-boys think it's Ronnie's best showing? they're ignorant just like you  ;) you think ANY of them trump what Ronnie says? NOPE sorry dummy

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/ronnie_coleman_interview.htm

Ronnie Coleman himself saying specifically his best Olympia was 1998 and this is the second time he's said so , the other time was Pro Bodybuilding Weekly , and he said so on that show it was because his conditioning was SPOT-ON in 1998

     
   
dot
[ Q ] What weight range will you look to compete at for your European show later this year (2009)?
dot

      I'll probably come in at about 275 to 280, somewhere in there, same as when I stopped competing. I'll probably try to come down to something like that.

dot
[ Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot

      Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.

      I had guys in front of me who had beaten me for the last ten years or so. Nobody picked me to go in and win that show because I had gotten ninth the year before. I had to come with an incredible package and blow all the judges away and that's what I pretty much did.


      Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.

everything was just spot on for that show , This is evidence , this is reality and this is a fact !

Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 21, 2009, 06:00:43 PM
this is so damn easy:

but no, ND claims it is only I who feels 99 ronnie was his best ever shape

LMAO

no wonder you cant advance above flowers in life LOL



Who are you quoting? you idiot? who? other idiots just like you  ;)

      Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.

Ronnie Coleman , owned once again by your own hero  ;)

it sucks to be you right about now  ;D
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 21, 2009, 06:12:04 PM
sounds good.

but ND usually runs away in embarassment after debating with me for any length of time.

he did so in the truce thread..

Ha ha ha ha I run away from you more bullshit on your behalf , I ended the Truce thread using your own hero and now you follow me around like the rest of the puppies begging for my attention

I beat you using your own hero , Roland Dean Coleman doesn't agree with you  ;)

Royal Flush moron , game over I won .

Special Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


aken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.  Dorian has a big physique - hard- and he's been the man to beat, and its hard to knock the champion off the block.  He's a big guy and has a lot going for him.  He overcame so many adversities, like his torn biceps, I couldnt see too much else stopping him.



Hulkster lost let the crying begin
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: G o a t b o y on June 21, 2009, 06:32:37 PM

Quote from: Matt C
I prefer ronnie so i prefer Hulkster's posts.

fixed ;D


Not true.  Do you really think Matt C of all people would prefer an 85IQ-African to a White Aryan former skinhead?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 06:35:52 PM
notice, ND quoting and quoting, without any pics/vids to back up the bullshit..

why? because the pics/vids prove the opinions to be incorrect. period

and I love this gem from suckmyasshole:

Quote
And no, he was holding water, evident in his hams and lower back

LMAO!

 ::)

ronnie was ripped to sheads, front and back..
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 06:37:53 PM
Quote
Ronnie Coleman admitting he couldn't beat Dorian on multiple occasions is evidence

ronnie's modesty and political commentary has nothing to do with comparing the physiques.

sorry.

tell us, if Ronnie had stated time and time again that King Kamali would beat him at his best, would that make it true?

hell no.

this is no different.

sorry, go back to your floral arrangments LOL
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 06:39:07 PM
Quote
He could work as an accountant, marketing manager or as an executive at the company, which wouldn't involve doing anything that requires an expertise in flowers or flower arrangements.

yeah right.

 ::)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NeoSeminole on June 21, 2009, 06:50:17 PM
who gives a shit if Ronnie said Dorian would beat him in 98 or that 98 was his best package? Ronnie also thinks he deserved to win in 06 (the year he lost to Jay) and claims he doesn't have any injuries, which HypocriticDeity likes to ignore. ::) Since HD is such a fan of quotes, here are some from more credible sources who agree that Ronnie at his prime is unbeatable and/or that his best showing wasn't 98. ;)

Joe Weider - IFBB Co-Founder

"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."

Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49

"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."

Lonnie Teper - MD, December 2005

"I've always said that it's too hard to compare athletes of different eras (then he names a few Mr. Olympias including Dorian). Still, it's hard to imagine that anybody who's ever stepped on a bodybuilding stage could have beaten Coleman. So I reserve the right to change my mind on this one. No offense to the rest of the champs - you were/are all truly amazing physique athletes - but Coleman has really taken it to the next level, as all magnificent conquerors do."

Tony Doherty - Heavy Muscle Radio (03-16-09)

"Ronnie is the best ever. No one even comes close."

Tony Doherty - http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=270388.msg3803035#msg3803035

"Absolutely no question. The best ever, I have seen them and worked with them all. Seeing Ronnie in 2003 was like looking into the future!"

Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer

"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"

http://www.muscletime.com/news/contest-results/2007-mr-olympia-analysis

Milos Sarcev - European Flex, April 2004

"Chris Lund who I consider to be a great expert in our sport of bodybuilding, told me that Ronnie is simply the best bodybuilder he has ever seen, or photographed, and he has seen everybody, during the last 35 years."

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=237938.0

Hollis Liebman - Former Fitness Editor and IFBB Official

"The era of the big man would commence with Lee Haney (1984-1991), whose formidable torso would dominate the lineup for 8 straight years and was then elevated by Dorian Yates (1992-1997), whose back and overall conditioning upped the ante yet again until an alien named Ronnie Coleman (1998-2005), in all likelihood the greatest bodybuilder of all time, would redefine the sport bringing a near 300 pound contest ready physique to the stage."

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=238675.0
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 07:55:42 PM
its no use Neo.

we are aruging with a flower-worker who posts the same quotes over again, while ignoring all others, while not even bothering to check and see (via pics and vids -the basis of this sport) if the quotes he keeps posting are correct opinions in the first place.

 problem is, they aren't.

fact is, it doesn't matter if the quote is from Ronnie, dorian, santa clause or the easter bunny - if the pics and vids show otherwise, the quotes are nothing more than incorrect opinions.

period.


thats the point that he misses..,

Ronnie claims his 98 olympia was his olympia best, but he has also claimed 99 was better, a fact that ND's pal McGough agrees with, but you don't see ND posting that over and over again.. ::)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: England_1 on June 21, 2009, 07:58:25 PM
IF you asked Ronnie today when he was at his best, he would say 98, like he has done multiple times. No shit he's gonna say he was better at the time of the 99 Olympia; nobody is going to train a year and then say they regressed  ::)

Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 07:59:56 PM
IF you asked Ronnie today when he was at his best, he would say 98, like he has done multiple times. No shit he's gonna say he was better at the time of the 99 Olympia; nobody is going to train a year and then say they regressed  ::)



your pal and ND's pal Peter McGough feels Ronnie's 99 olympia physique was his best olympia presentation.

post that over and over again lol
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Dballn247 on June 21, 2009, 08:21:31 PM
Booooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=108663.0;attach=326965;image) (http://techsmartly.net/lol/0ce3ad7b4e)











































 ;D
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: G o a t b o y on June 21, 2009, 08:32:05 PM
who gives a shit if Ronnie said Dorian would beat him in 98 or that 98 was his best package? Ronnie also thinks he deserved to win in 06 (the year he lost to Jay) and claims he doesn't have any injuries, which HypocriticDeity likes to ignore. ::) Since HD is such a fan of quotes, here are some from more credible sources who agree that Ronnie at his prime is unbeatable and/or that his best showing wasn't 98. ;)

Joe Weider - IFBB Co-Founder

"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."

Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49

"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."

Lonnie Teper - MD, December 2005

"I've always said that it's too hard to compare athletes of different eras (then he names a few Mr. Olympias including Dorian). Still, it's hard to imagine that anybody who's ever stepped on a bodybuilding stage could have beaten Coleman. So I reserve the right to change my mind on this one. No offense to the rest of the champs - you were/are all truly amazing physique athletes - but Coleman has really taken it to the next level, as all magnificent conquerors do."

Tony Doherty - Heavy Muscle Radio (03-16-09)

"Ronnie is the best ever. No one even comes close."

Tony Doherty - http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=270388.msg3803035#msg3803035

"Absolutely no question. The best ever, I have seen them and worked with them all. Seeing Ronnie in 2003 was like looking into the future!"

Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer

"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"

http://www.muscletime.com/news/contest-results/2007-mr-olympia-analysis

Milos Sarcev - European Flex, April 2004

"Chris Lund who I consider to be a great expert in our sport of bodybuilding, told me that Ronnie is simply the best bodybuilder he has ever seen, or photographed, and he has seen everybody, during the last 35 years."

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=237938.0

Hollis Liebman - Former Fitness Editor and IFBB Official

"The era of the big man would commence with Lee Haney (1984-1991), whose formidable torso would dominate the lineup for 8 straight years and was then elevated by Dorian Yates (1992-1997), whose back and overall conditioning upped the ante yet again until an alien named Ronnie Coleman (1998-2005), in all likelihood the greatest bodybuilder of all time, would redefine the sport bringing a near 300 pound contest ready physique to the stage."

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=238675.0



"Ebony mountains of muscle"

Hiney Rimjob - Self-Appointed Bodybuilding "guru"
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: bigbobs on June 21, 2009, 08:51:31 PM
LMFAO that they have turned this into another one of those threads.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 12:51:28 AM
who gives a shit if Ronnie said Dorian would beat him in 98 or that 98 was his best package? Ronnie also thinks he deserved to win in 06 (the year he lost to Jay) and claims he doesn't have any injuries, which HypocriticDeity likes to ignore. ::) Since HD is such a fan of quotes, here are some from more credible sources who agree that Ronnie at his prime is unbeatable and/or that his best showing wasn't 98. ;)



You give a shit if Ronnie said Dorian would beat him that's who you and every other nutt-hugging Trollman fan , it absolutely kills you Ronnie admits this and I love how you dismiss the guy in question he's the only one who's opinion doesn't matter on the subject  ::) more splendid logic from you

And what's him bitching about 2006 have to do with Yates? NOTHING he felt he won he was obviously wrong , same with his torn muscles , he had a reason to lie , does he have a reason to lie about Dorian? a man who beat him consistently for years?

and as far as 1998 I never once claimed it was his best showing , I said it was his best Olympia showing and guess what? Ronnie's admitted this on many occasions specifically because his conditioning was ' spot-on ' compared to any other of his Olympia wins , I've always maintained 2001 Arnold Classic was his best showing of his whole career as do many others and NOT 2003 like some idiot claimed  ;D

and you have balls calling anyone a hypocrite recall this dummy?

First, I didn't disagree with Peter McGough's claim that Ronnie was never harder or drier than Dorian.

again your quote

I'm sorry but Peter McGough is an idiot if he thinks 01 ASC Ronnie never surpassed Dorian's conditioning.



And thanks for proving my point once again lost puppy  ;)

Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 01:00:40 AM
its no use Neo.

we are aruging with a flower-worker who posts the same quotes over again, while ignoring all others, while not even bothering to check and see (via pics and vids -the basis of this sport) if the quotes he keeps posting are correct opinions in the first place.

 problem is, they aren't.

fact is, it doesn't matter if the quote is from Ronnie, dorian, santa clause or the easter bunny - if the pics and vids show otherwise, the quotes are nothing more than incorrect opinions.

period.


thats the point that he misses..,

Ronnie claims his 98 olympia was his olympia best, but he has also claimed 99 was better, a fact that ND's pal McGough agrees with, but you don't see ND posting that over and over again.. ::)

Ronnie did say in 1999 he was his in the best shape of his life that was in 99 after reflecting on his entire career in 2008 when posed the question he said 1998 was better more specifically because his conditioning was spot-on which coincides with McGough who said Ronnie was.......you guessed it harder & drier in 1998 compared to 1999 and more to shred more ignorance on you McGough says 2001 Arnold Classic is his best showing and NOT 1999 so either way you're wrong as usual

and it's " No use "  is right because you can never counter the fact Ronnie himself feels Dorian would beat him , it sucks to be you and it's exactly why you're reduced to personal attacks and following me around in every thread I own you and every guy with the FACT Ronnie admitted multiple times he couldn't beat Dorian  ;)

Keep following me around proving my point I beat YOU using your own hero . case closed.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 01:03:29 AM
your pal and ND's pal Peter McGough feels Ronnie's 99 olympia physique was his best olympia presentation.

post that over and over again lol

He could it doesn't change the fact he feels 2001 is his best showing and ever and 1998 he was harder & drier  ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: TrueGrit on June 22, 2009, 02:30:22 AM
 You have to respect the fact that these guys have both devoted most of their free time, possible career opportunities, and shunned social situations, simply to debate the merits and demerits of a man's body.

 
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: The Ugly on June 22, 2009, 06:04:54 AM
Ok, I'm confused again. Which is it, Ronnie or Dorian?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NeoSeminole on June 22, 2009, 10:32:51 AM
You give a shit if Ronnie said Dorian would beat him that's who you and every other nutt-hugging Trollman fan , it absolutely kills you Ronnie admits this and I love how you dismiss the guy in question he's the only one who's opinion doesn't matter on the subject more splendid logic from you

yawn, I honestly could care less what Ronnie says. The guy is the best bodybuilder who ever lived. That doesn't make him the most knowledgable on the subject.

Quote
And what's him bitching about 2006 have to do with Yates? NOTHING he felt he won he was obviously wrong , same with his torn muscles , he had a reason to lie , does he have a reason to lie about Dorian? a man who beat him consistently for years?

I can't tell if you're playing dumb or just stupid. Ronnie losing in 06 and claiming he should have won is proof he's not fit to judge contests. So his opinion of who would win between him and Dorian carries little weight. As for lying about his injuries, he also had a reason to lie about losing to Dorian. Everybody has been telling you but you're too dense to listen. Ronnie was being modest b/c he wanted to show respect to a former champion. This is backed up by another quote from him where he says he would beat all the former Mr. Olympias in a contest but not during their respective reigns.

Ronnie Coleman Interview by John Stamatopoulos

John: "This is my last question for you Ronnie, and it's quite "hypothetical" but I believe it is a good one. Let's say that it would be possible to have a bodybuilding contest where the only competitors would be you, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Lee Haney, and Dorian Yates, and all of you in their prime condition. Who do you believe would win?"

Ronnie: "Come on now, this is the age of Ronnie Coleman who else would win... but I couldn't have beat them in their hey days."

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/rcinter.htm
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: Big Mark C on June 22, 2009, 11:07:13 AM
Thanks for proving my point troll  ;) still pissed I outed you as a tranny chaser huh? it's ironic you're questioning anyone's sexuality seeing it's you who refers to men who dress like women as ' gorgeous '

I own you for perpetuity

lol

pumpster loves men in drag
       pumpster is a fag
he likes his dude with lipstick
       they sit on his small dick
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 01:26:16 PM
yawn, I honestly could care less what Ronnie says. The guy is the best bodybuilder who ever lived. That doesn't make him the most knowledgable on the subject.

I can't tell if you're playing dumb or just stupid. Ronnie losing in 06 and claiming he should have won is proof he's not fit to judge contests. So his opinion of who would win between him and Dorian carries little weight. As for lying about his injuries, he also had a reason to lie about losing to Dorian. Everybody has been telling you but you're too dense to listen. Ronnie was being modest b/c he wanted to show respect to a former champion. This is backed up by another quote from him where he says he would beat all the former Mr. Olympias in a contest but not during their respective reigns.

Ronnie Coleman Interview by John Stamatopoulos

John: "This is my last question for you Ronnie, and it's quite "hypothetical" but I believe it is a good one. Let's say that it would be possible to have a bodybuilding contest where the only competitors would be you, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Lee Haney, and Dorian Yates, and all of you in their prime condition. Who do you believe would win?"

Ronnie: "Come on now, this is the age of Ronnie Coleman who else would win... but I couldn't have beat them in their hey days."

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/rcinter.htm

Quote
yawn, I honestly could care less what Ronnie says. The guy is the best bodybuilder who ever lived. That doesn't make him the most knowledgable on the subject.

Man can you get anymore dumb? you just typed you don't care what Ronnie has to say and then post a quote from him , and no one is saying he has to be the most knowledgeable on the subject (  you sure the fuck ain't , yet on many occasions dismissed those who are  ;) ) his opinion matters more than ANYONE else sans judges , that includes everyone you offered

Quote
I can't tell if you're playing dumb or just stupid. Ronnie losing in 06 and claiming he should have won is proof he's not fit to judge contests. So his opinion of who would win between him and Dorian carries little weight. As for lying about his injuries, he also had a reason to lie about losing to Dorian. Everybody has been telling you but you're too dense to listen. Ronnie was being modest b/c he wanted to show respect to a former champion. This is backed up by another quote from him where he says he would beat all the former Mr. Olympias in a contest but not during their respective reigns.

In the heat of the moment Ronnie said he should have won in 06 in time with reflection I'm sure he came to admit the obvious , he lost. LMFAO he had a reason to lie about losing to Dorian spoken like a true guy and everyone? you mean all Ronnie fans pissed because he admits what kills you the most? what else are you going to say? he's being modest HA HA HA HA HA he's being HONEST , Dorian is a man who routinely beat him
And as far as the quote which you could honestly care less what Ronnie has to say

NO WHERE does he say he would beat ANYONE of those guys NO WHERE he eludes to it but never commits to it , nice try though and then he admits he could NOT beat them in their time , this was a diplomatic statement because he never commits to a definitive answer , this is exactly what you're saying the other quotes are which in fact they're NOT its ambiguous but ironically he states he couldn't beat them in their times  ;)


Special Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


Definitive , honest and to the point NO speculation or ambiguity

aken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.  Dorian has a big physique - hard- and he's been the man to beat, and its hard to knock the champion off the block.  He's a big guy and has a lot going for him.  He overcame so many adversities, like his torn biceps, I couldnt see too much else stopping him.




same as above , I know it sucks but his opinion on the topic beats ANYONE other than judges who only matter , When the Greatest Bodybuilding Who Ever Lived says Dorian would beat him it shows how much respect he has for Dorian which speaks volumes

Title: Re: ND and Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 01:27:15 PM
lol

pumpster loves men in drag
       pumpster is a fag
he likes his dude with lipstick
       they sit on his small dick

ha ha ha ha pumpster = owned
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 22, 2009, 01:44:27 PM
Quote
I can't tell if you're playing dumb or just stupid.

the guy works with flowers for a living. its obvious 8)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 22, 2009, 01:45:45 PM
Ronnie did say in 1999 he was his in the best shape of his life that was in 99 after reflecting on his entire career in 2008 when posed the question he said 1998 was better more specifically because his conditioning was spot-on which coincides with McGough who said Ronnie was.......you guessed it harder & drier in 1998 compared to 1999 and more to shred more ignorance on you McGough says 2001 Arnold Classic is his best showing and NOT 1999 so either way you're wrong as usual

and it's " No use "  is right because you can never counter the fact Ronnie himself feels Dorian would beat him , it sucks to be you and it's exactly why you're reduced to personal attacks and following me around in every thread I own you and every guy with the FACT Ronnie admitted multiple times he couldn't beat Dorian  ;)

Keep following me around proving my point I beat YOU using your own hero . case closed.

your trying to prove opinions by quoting other opinions.

you don't get it.you need corroborating proof (pics and vids) to back up the quotes.

but you won't post that, because it shows the opinions to be incorrect..

 ::)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on June 22, 2009, 02:04:04 PM
Best ever is clearly Arnold.  :)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Matt C on June 22, 2009, 02:11:48 PM
ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)

Hulkster.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: jack_ftype on June 22, 2009, 02:26:47 PM
thank you Neoseminole - I guess ND will come back telling us how all those opinions aren't credible compared to his - he's the EXPERT, after all.  What a jackass.  Ronnie was much better, it's fuccking OBVIOUS.  Quit being such a douchebag.

And I'm not a fan of Hulkster, he just happens to have 20/20 vision (apparently unlike ND) and can see what pretty much everyone else can too - that Ronnie wins this 'debate' hands down.  Jesus.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Immortal_Technique on June 22, 2009, 02:33:01 PM
I actually can't comprehend the worthlessness of this argument. Does Ronnie saying something make it true?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 22, 2009, 02:37:12 PM
Quote
he just happens to have 20/20 vision (apparently unlike ND) and can see what pretty much everyone else can too - that Ronnie wins this 'debate' hands down.  Jesus.

yup.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 22, 2009, 02:40:17 PM
Quote
he just happens to have 20/20 vision (apparently unlike ND) and can see what pretty much everyone else can too - that Ronnie wins this 'debate' hands down.  Jesus.

people like ND don't know how the sport is judged, thats the problem.

they have no idea how to evaluate a physique, what is considered desriable as far as judging goes (eg. twig arms on a barrel torso is not lol) etc.
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 02:47:02 PM
thank you Neoseminole - I guess ND will come back telling us how all those opinions aren't credible compared to his - he's the EXPERT, after all.  What a jackass.  Ronnie was much better, it's fuccking OBVIOUS.  Quit being such a douchebag.

And I'm not a fan of Hulkster, he just happens to have 20/20 vision (apparently unlike ND) and can see what pretty much everyone else can too - that Ronnie wins this 'debate' hands down.  Jesus.

ha ha ha gimmicks out in full force

I may not be a expert but I sure as fuck know more than ALL of them combined that's a proven fact , Ronnie isn't much better and ANY fan boy who says so is talking out their ass as usual  ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 02:50:38 PM
people like ND don't know how the sport is judged, thats the problem.

they have no idea how to evaluate a physique, what is considered desriable as far as judging goes (eg. twig arms on a barrel torso is not lol) etc.

Most ironic post you ever typed , on the subject of competitive bodybuilding I know more than ALL of you combined , especially YOU , you're the moron who claimed Dorian lost one of the most dominating victories in IFBB history LMMFAO this shows how much you know , which is NOTHING

and evaluate a physique? Ronnie has more detailed calves than Dorian? Ronnie was granier than Dorian ever was in 99? Dorian's back is flat as a pancake? LMFAO do I really need to continue?  ;)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: emn1964 on June 22, 2009, 02:53:26 PM
just a couple of queens fighting for their man
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 02:53:39 PM
I actually can't comprehend the worthlessness of this argument. Does Ronnie saying something make it true?

No it doesn't and neither does ANYONE else the ONLY people who count are IFBB judges , I've ALWAYS maintained this but it absolutely KILLS anything anyone else has to say because it is the man in question speaking on the topic at hand and after all he is the greatest bodybuilder who ever lived and his opinion carries more weight than these idiots give him credit for
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 02:56:04 PM
ronnie's modesty and political commentary has nothing to do with comparing the physiques.

sorry.

tell us, if Ronnie had stated time and time again that King Kamali would beat him at his best, would that make it true?

hell no.

this is no different.

sorry, go back to your floral arrangments LOL

Piss poor analogy as usual dummy King Kamali NEVER beat Ronnie , Dorian did for years on end  ;)

Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Bast175 on June 22, 2009, 02:57:09 PM
Piss poor analogy



You two guys really love ANALogies
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 02:59:19 PM
your trying to prove opinions by quoting other opinions.

you don't get it.you need corroborating proof (pics and vids) to back up the quotes.

but you won't post that, because it shows the opinions to be incorrect..

 ::)

Pics and vid? you mean the photoshopped pics YOU posted is proof? 99% of the screencaps YOU posted were already exposed for enhanced by Kevin Horton

I have 98 and 99 videos DO YOU? NO do you even know what conditioning is and isn't? NO

you're arguing with your own hero once again and as usual Ronnie OWNS you
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: The Ugly on June 22, 2009, 03:16:22 PM
Pics and vid? you mean the photoshopped pics YOU posted is proof? 99% of the screencaps YOU posted were already exposed for enhanced by Kevin Horton

I have 98 and 99 videos DO YOU? NO do you even know what conditioning is and isn't? NO

you're arguing with your own hero once again and as usual Ronnie OWNS you

Who would you say is the better bodybuilder, though, Ronnie Coleman or Dorian Yates?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 03:22:55 PM
Who would you say is the better bodybuilder, though, Ronnie Coleman or Dorian Yates?

Dorian Yates , and Ronnie Coleman agrees with me  ;D
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: The Ugly on June 22, 2009, 03:23:59 PM
Dorian Yates , and Ronnie Coleman agrees with me  ;D

Hulkster, your thoughts?
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 22, 2009, 04:11:32 PM
my thoughts are that I can tell from the (lack of) intelligence displayed on this board by ND that he will never advance to the coveted rank of Flower Arranger.

even if he does suck off the Flower Boss. lol
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 04:39:26 PM
my thoughts are that I can tell from the (lack of) intelligence displayed on this board by ND that he will never advance to the coveted rank of Flower Arranger.

even if he does suck off the Flower Boss. lol


Hulkster quote " See ND was smart "


owned :-) notice i never once said the same about you
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 22, 2009, 06:02:12 PM
this is why ND never posts any corroborating pics with his quotes.

they show them to be wrong.

once again, 99 ronnie owning even his 2001 AC form, with a noticably smaller cut, better quads etc. etc

flowerboy fucking OWNED..

this is why quotes by themselves are worthless whether they are from ronnie, the easter bunny, McGough, dorian or Kamali lol

you need pics otherwise all you might have is bullshit.

real life is the deciding factor:
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 06:44:11 PM
this is why ND never posts any corroborating pics with his quotes.

they show them to be wrong.

once again, 99 ronnie owning even his 2001 AC form, with a noticably smaller cut, better quads etc. etc

flowerboy fucking OWNED..

this is why quotes by themselves are worthless whether they are from ronnie, the easter bunny, McGough, dorian or Kamali lol

you need pics otherwise all you might have is bullshit.

real life is the deciding factor:

Everytime you type ' real life ' and then posts pictures I always laugh , because you're telling people who were actually there in REAL LIFE and not looking at pictures in the internet they're wrong it shows just how fucking stupid you are , real life 2001 TRAMPLES 1999 hence why it's considered his best showing and not 1999

Real life is Ronnie Coleman stated his best Olympia was 1998 , real life is Ronnie Coleman stating he couldn't beat Dorian , Real life is not two pictures you post sorry kid if you have any intelligence what ever you'd know his but once again you're in fantasy land where Ronnie has more detailed calves and Dorian lost the 93 Olympia lol


you don't even fucking own the 98/99 Olympia videos LMFAO
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 22, 2009, 06:51:45 PM
hahaha

your too stupid to realize that none of that means anything with respect to the real comparison I posted..

 ::)

what are you going to say? everyone can see that ronnie's lat spread was better in 99 than at the AC (less of a gut) and your trying to deny that because of some quotes? LMAO ::)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Hulkster on June 22, 2009, 06:53:33 PM
Quote
Everytime you type ' real life ' and then posts pictures I always laugh

and you should

because they always prove what you state in your posts (via other people's opinons) to be WRONG.

you don't understand the concept of corroborating evidence to back up a position, do you?

oh thats right, you arrange flowers for a living, so you can't be expected to..hahahahaha :P
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 06:58:37 PM
hahaha

your too stupid to realize that none of that means anything with respect to the real comparison I posted..

 ::)

what are you going to say? everyone can see that ronnie's lat spread was better in 99 than at the AC (less of a gut) and your trying to deny that because of some quotes? LMAO ::)

Again you're stuck on stupid that is NOT a real comparison NOTHING Is real about it , you think by posting two pictures and saying look how much better he was means a thing? you were NOT there , never was there , you don't even own the damn video lmao and you'll have the balls to type the guys who were in attendance are all wrong , you're an idiot and ONLY YOU think he's better

again in your fantasy world Ronnie 99 Olympia is the greatest ever when reality he says it isn't and to quote you " he knows his own body better than you do "

run along dummy your fantasy world awaits where Dorian was never as grainy as Ronnie lmao
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 22, 2009, 07:07:45 PM
and you should

because they always prove what you state in your posts (via other people's opinons) to be WRONG.

you don't understand the concept of corroborating evidence to back up a position, do you?

oh thats right, you arrange flowers for a living, so you can't be expected to..hahahahaha :P

Other peoples opinions who were actually there live and in person , you on the otherhand don't even own the video of the contest LMAO oh wait you're the same guy who said you're just as qualified to judge contest at home via the internet as the judges are who were live and in person , this shows your level of ignorance

and oh that's right you have to try and attack what I do for a living to try and make yourself feel better about the beating you're getting , I beat you in the truce thread and I'm beating you out of it , I don't need to attack you personally just the stupidity you type about bodybuilding , as usual YOU FAIL
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: suckmymuscle on August 01, 2009, 07:48:55 AM
Serious question broskies, do you ever get tired of this same fucking argument?

  No, I never get tired of it. In fact, even though I took a rest from the debate and posted only in non-Dorian vs Ronnie threads, I will now revive all Dorian vs Ronnie debates and will post in all of them until total victory for the Dorian camp is assured. >:(

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 01, 2009, 09:31:04 AM
people like ND don't know how the sport is judged, thats the problem.

they have no idea how to evaluate a physique, what is considered desriable as far as judging goes (eg. twig arms on a barrel torso is not lol) etc.

Oh, the irony!   ::)
Title: Re: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 01, 2009, 09:43:59 AM
Oh, the irony!   ::)

True especially when it was me who explained to him how the IFBB mens pro judging works not the other way around , this coming from the idiot who claimed Dorian lost the 93 Olympia and Ronnie dominated the 01  ::)