Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Insider Z on August 23, 2009, 11:20:07 AM

Title: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Insider Z on August 23, 2009, 11:20:07 AM
Milos or Chick?
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Signifying Monkey on August 23, 2009, 11:24:53 AM
Are you for real? what did chick do other than get gifted a show by hs sponsor?
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: MethodGNA on August 23, 2009, 11:28:21 AM
"insider Z"............what ever hole you crawled into in 2007, and recently reemerged from.........please go back there.........and set charges to the enterance.
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Mr Nobody on August 23, 2009, 11:29:17 AM
Close but Milos has the edge
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Insider Z on August 23, 2009, 11:30:29 AM
Quote from: MethodGNA on August 23, 2009, 11:28:21 AM
"insider Z"............what ever hole you crawled into in 2007, and recently reemerged from.........please go back there.........and set charges to the enterance.

Ehi, bro' 
I'm just trying to find some answers

Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: saucetradomous on August 23, 2009, 11:37:10 AM
Quote from: Insider Z on August 23, 2009, 11:30:29 AM
Ehi, bro' 
I'm just trying to find some answers



Hi Lee.
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Insider Z on August 23, 2009, 11:50:13 AM
Quote from: saucetradomous on August 23, 2009, 11:37:10 AM
Hi Lee.

If I'm Lee I'd be better than Milos and Chick
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: kyomu on August 23, 2009, 12:06:08 PM
Milos.

But his arms sucks.
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Big_Tymer on August 23, 2009, 12:19:45 PM
Milos.  His lines are 10x better.
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: saucetradomous on August 23, 2009, 12:26:38 PM
Quote from: kyomu on August 23, 2009, 12:06:08 PM
Milos.

But his arms sucks.

Gotta admit milos physique was/is better but atleast Bob didn't go the oil route.
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: MethodGNA on August 23, 2009, 12:28:55 PM
Quote from: saucetradomous on August 23, 2009, 12:26:38 PM
Gotta admit milos physique was/is better but atleast Bob didn't go the oil route.

you dont know that..........this is the precedent set for proper synthol application.........if a guy looks like he is using synthol, then he is using it incorrectly........there are many many pros who use synthol, they just dont go nuts with it
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Mars on August 23, 2009, 12:38:50 PM
wish my arms were like milos his
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: saucetradomous on August 23, 2009, 01:18:28 PM
Quote from: Mars on August 23, 2009, 12:38:50 PM
wish my arms were like milos his

you ain't doing to bad yourself there mars.
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: johnnynoname on August 23, 2009, 01:20:44 PM
milos has a cooler name  ;D
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: jon cole on August 23, 2009, 01:22:26 PM
why so much hate against chick ?
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: affeman on August 23, 2009, 01:23:20 PM
Milos had one of the best physiques ever imo (except for the arms) (no homo)
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Schmoe Buster on August 23, 2009, 01:27:04 PM
Milos has real hair and doesnt have to scape a living stepping in dog shit as a movie extra like Chick does

but Lunk Mullethead was a better pro than both of them, insider Z will agree ;)
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: affeman on August 23, 2009, 01:29:14 PM
Quote from: Schmoe Buster on August 23, 2009, 01:27:04 PM
Milos has real hair and doesnt have to scape a living stepping in dog shit as a movie extra like Chick does

haha you're obsessed with that dogshit thing ;D
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Schmoe Buster on August 23, 2009, 01:50:53 PM
Quote from: affeman on August 23, 2009, 01:29:14 PM
haha you're obsessed with that dogshit thing ;D

Chicks performance was Oscar worthy, give the guy credit he spent months perfecting the stepping in the shit, a true thespian ;D
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Mr Nobody on August 23, 2009, 01:57:35 PM
Quote from: Schmoe Buster on August 23, 2009, 01:50:53 PM
Chicks performance was Oscar worthy, give the guy credit he spent months perfecting the stepping in the shit, a true thespian ;D
Hey Schome Buster did Chick win this before or after the Mirage? It could had a bearing on his performance ;)
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Schmoe Buster on August 23, 2009, 02:01:41 PM
Quote from: Mr Nobody on August 23, 2009, 01:57:35 PM
Hey Schome Buster did Chick win this before or after the Mirage? It could had a bearing on his performance ;)

Chicks whole life is a mirage ;D
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: affeman on August 23, 2009, 02:19:44 PM
Quote from: Schmoe Buster on August 23, 2009, 01:50:53 PM
Chicks performance was Oscar worthy, give the guy credit he spent months perfecting the stepping in the shit, a true thespian ;D

LOL You must have not even seen the movie, as he stepped in the dogshit off-screen. You see him only walking over to that guy and screaming at him that he stepped in the dog poo, you actually don't even see him doing it. ;D
Title: Re: Who was a better pro?
Post by: Signifying Monkey on August 24, 2009, 01:25:42 AM
Quote from: affeman on August 23, 2009, 02:19:44 PM
LOL You must have not even seen the movie, as he stepped in the dogshit off-screen. You see him only walking over to that guy and screaming at him that he stepped in the dog poo, you actually don't even see him doing it. ;D

Bob tried very hard to get the stepping in dogshit scene right, but the director would have none of it.  He said he wanted Bob on-screen for "2 seconds max" and cut the scene from the movie