Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Hulkster on September 06, 2009, 04:44:32 AM

Title: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 06, 2009, 04:44:32 AM
 :-*

hi nasshuggers! :P
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 05:00:49 AM
 :-\ :-\
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: affeman on September 06, 2009, 05:15:27 AM
LOL That pic is the self-owning of the century. You noticed that smooth, skinny guy in the background? ;D

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=296827.0;attach=337521;image)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: TRIX on September 06, 2009, 05:16:20 AM
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/ddd0113.jpg)
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/ddd0109.jpg) beast called
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 06:03:56 AM
LOL That pic is the self-owning of the century. You noticed that smooth, skinny guy in the background? ;D

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=296827.0;attach=337521;image)

it's strange that achim's head looks bigger than ronnie's although he is behind him :)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Immortal_Technique on September 06, 2009, 06:07:09 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=296827.0;attach=337526;image)

Look at Ronnie's "terrible" triceps bwahahahahahah

And quads "not better than Dorians",

Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 06:10:29 AM
Hold on for a second ND will be here shortly with comments. ;)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: TRIX on September 06, 2009, 06:28:31 AM
Do arabs have triceps?
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 06, 2009, 07:07:52 AM
thanks for posting the double bi shot of nasser. its nice to see how bad his structure is compared to the 8 time Mr. O's. high lats and a long torso, sort of like dexter.. :-\

talk about nasser getting owned. the oil bags oops I mean arms are on full display there :P
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 07:10:05 AM
Do arabs have triceps?
Sometimes
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: ManBearPig... on September 06, 2009, 07:23:41 AM
Do arabs have triceps?

they're usually blown off.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 07:26:47 AM
thanks for posting the double bi shot of nasser. its nice to see how bad his structure is compared to the 8 time Mr. O's. high lats and a long torso, sort of like dexter.. :-\

talk about nasser getting owned. the oil bags oops I mean arms are on full display there :P

really? and what about ronnie's gyno, weird abs, and, non-existent calves in this pose??.. not a single word from you about them!! :-\..

yes love is blind ;D
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 07:29:44 AM
really? and what about ronnie's gyno, weird abs, and, non-existent calves in this pose??.. not a single word from you about them!! :-\..

yes love is blind ;D
I think nasser is crushing ronnie in all these pics sheriff
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 07:31:58 AM
Do arabs have triceps?

 :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 07:35:12 AM
I think nasser is crushing ronnie in all these pics sheriff

if i was like hulkster i was going to post comparisons between nasser and ronnie from the NOC 1995 when ronnie looked like nasser's little kid but i used pics where both of them looked good..
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 06, 2009, 07:35:36 AM
I think nasser is crushing ronnie in all these pics sheriff

yeah, but you think everyone crushes ronnie..

 :P
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 07:38:02 AM
yeah, but you think everyone crushes ronnie..

 :P

hulkster i really want to ask you a serious question.. in your own opinion what are ronnie's weak points??.. plz dont ignore this question!
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 07:40:22 AM
yeah, but you think everyone crushes ronnie..

 :P
Totally wrong Sheriff..Ronnie has crushed many a man ;)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: kiwiol on September 06, 2009, 07:41:03 AM
Never come close? What the hell are you smoking, Hulkster?
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: chaos on September 06, 2009, 07:44:07 AM
Never come close? What the hell are you smoking, Hulkster?
Are you skirting the line of joining QuakerOats and Team Nasser on their unholy fall from grace ???
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 07:48:17 AM
Totally wrong Sheriff..Ronnie has crushed many a man ;)

sure ronnie's back was better than nasser's!!!!.. but imo at his best (NOC/hutson 95 or mr. olympia 96) nasser was a better bodybuilder than ronnie at his best..

ronnie was great for sure but at his best shows like NOC 98, olympia 98-99 or AC 2001 he still had his many weak parts!!.. i dont like the shape of his chest and abs and his tiny calves under his huge quads.. also dont like his weird gluts..
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 07:50:46 AM
sure ronnie's back was better than nasser's!!!!.. but imo at his best (NOC/hutson 95 or mr. olympia 96) nasser was a better bodybuilder than ronnie at his best..

ronnie was great for sure but at his best shows like NOC 98, olympia 98-99 or AC 2001 he still had his many weak parts!!.. i dont like the shape of his chest and abs and his tiny calves under his huge quads.. also dont like his weird gluts..
Ronnie looked fantastic for many years the last few years at the O he looked like a bunch of bodyparts put together at the auto shop where Nasser works :D
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: kiwiol on September 06, 2009, 07:52:22 AM
Are you skirting the line of joining QuakerOats and Team Nasser on their unholy fall from grace ???

LOL! I'm not the biggest Nasser fan, but Hulkster is nuts if he thinks Nasser never came close to Ronnie. From the front, Nasser looked better than Ronnie from 1995 - early 98 IMO.

As much as I like to troll here, I still have to make a post here and there about men in thongs, Chaos. Remember, it's only gay if you want it to be ;D

Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: chaos on September 06, 2009, 07:53:05 AM
LOL. I'm not the biggest Nasser fan, but Hulkster is nuts if he thinks Nasser never came close to Ronnie. From the front, Nasser looked better than Ronnie from 1995 - early 98 IMO.

As much as I like to troll here, I still have to make a post here and there about men in thongs, Chaos. Remember, it's only gay if you want it to be ;D


Outed.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 07:53:20 AM
Ronnie looked fantastic for many years the last few years at the O he looked like a bunch of bodyparts put together at the auto shop where Nasser works :D

 ;D ;D ;D

i honestly believe he didnt deserve many of his olympia victories just like yates..
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: kiwiol on September 06, 2009, 07:54:33 AM
Outed.

 ;D
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: ChristopherA on September 06, 2009, 08:10:02 AM
:-*

hi nasshuggers! :P
Ronnie's most muscular is friggin sick! Best ever? Anyone got a better shot from someone else?
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 08:11:54 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 08:15:52 AM
Ronnie's most muscular is friggin sick! Best ever? Anyone got a better shot from someone else?

post the best mm pic. of ronnie to answer you with proofs :P
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Danimal77 on September 06, 2009, 01:16:18 PM
Ronnie's most muscular is friggin sick! Best ever? Anyone got a better shot from someone else?

Sorry kid, but this guy shits all over Coleman and everyone else in the history of BB:

Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Palpatine Q on September 06, 2009, 01:55:19 PM
:-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\

who's the 130 lb. aids victim in the middle with 11 inch arms?
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Royal Lion on September 06, 2009, 01:59:21 PM
Ronnie's most muscular is friggin sick! Best ever? Anyone got a better shot from someone else?
Ronnie's MM is the most impressive ever. Wolf has to be up there as well as Victor. 
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: bigbobs on September 06, 2009, 03:09:01 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=296827.0;attach=337520;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=229906.0;attach=269020;image)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: bigbobs on September 06, 2009, 03:09:42 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=296462.0;attach=337068;image)
(http://www.musclememory.com/magCovers/fl/fl1502.jpg)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: FlexGuns on September 06, 2009, 03:22:57 PM
Something NASSER never had.
(http://www.getbig.com/magazine/flex/flex0311.jpg)

(http://www.musclememory.com/magCovers/fl/fl1611.jpg)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 03:59:44 PM
who's the 130 132 lb. aids victim in the middle with 11 11.5 inch arms?

fixed for truth >:(
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: The ChemistV2 on September 06, 2009, 04:05:54 PM
LOL! I'm not the biggest Nasser fan, but Hulkster is nuts if he thinks Nasser never came close to Ronnie. From the front, Nasser looked better than Ronnie from 1995 - early 98 IMO.As much as I like to troll here, I still have to make a post here and there about men in thongs, Chaos. Remember, it's only gay if you want it to be ;D


Have to agree here. Pretty unbeatable in those years. With a bit more back separaration and detail, he would have been Mr. O.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 04:20:15 PM
Have to agree here. Pretty unbeatable in those years. With a bit more back separaration and detail, he would have been Mr. O.

even with his back as it was he deserved to be mr. olympia 2-3 times (AT LEAST)..
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: The ChemistV2 on September 06, 2009, 04:59:13 PM
even with his back as it was he deserved to be mr. olympia 2-3 times (AT LEAST)..
Well, at least once maybe..but it seems since the Lee haney era, all the Mr. Olympias usually had a back that was their best bodypart. Haney, Yates, Coleman all have that. Now is it fair that someone should beat Nasser when they have terrible biceps, or weak calves or a bloated stomach ?...Maybe not. But apparently the judges deemed the back more important.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 06, 2009, 05:07:51 PM
even with his back as it was he deserved to be mr. olympia 2-3 times (AT LEAST)..
Well Sheriff I would say one dont go overboard here ;)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 06, 2009, 05:30:15 PM
Well, at least once maybe..but it seems since the Lee haney era, all the Mr. Olympias usually had a back that was their best bodypart. Haney, Yates, Coleman all have that. Now is it fair that someone should beat Nasser when they have terrible biceps, or weak calves or a bloated stomach ?...Maybe not. But apparently the judges deemed the back more important.

although the rear double biceps or the rear lat spread both dont mean the back only,.. these 2 poses include other muscles like calves, hams, shoulders, arms!!.. nasser was better than dorian in all these other muscles except calves and was better than ronnie in calves and hams and was equal to him or may be better in shoulders and arms!!.. i am not saying that nasser was better than dorian or ronnie in these poses but as a whole he was comparable while from the front he was better than both of them specially dorian in 96 and 97 who was much weaker then nasser in nearly all areas except his back!!.. from the front dorian was not comparable to nasser specially in 97 while nasser was comparable to him from the back!
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 06, 2009, 06:17:51 PM
Sorry kid, but this guy shits all over Coleman and everyone else in the history of BB:



no, Ronnie beats it.

but its close. BeefitBeetle is amazing in the mm shot.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Royalty on September 06, 2009, 06:28:32 PM
In 2000, Ronnie himself said that Nasser was always a major threat at the Olympia.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: TRIX on September 06, 2009, 06:35:14 PM
Wolfs most muscular is a whole different pose to coleman, coleman is mainly focusing on flexing his chest and arms, whereas wolf is leaning more forward, raises his shoulders forward with his traps.. I like wolfs and ronnies. Ruhls is horrible, gunter does the arnold type, don't really like it. Dexter does the hammer dirt most muscular, he should try one with his palms facing up.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 06, 2009, 06:50:50 PM
true, but Wolf's pose is like Ruhl's and Gunter's: it needs triceps badly
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr.1derful on September 06, 2009, 08:17:28 PM
(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=44934&g2_serialNumber=3&g2_GALLERYSID=4f73b3cc7edc2298b76bd514b8eb2a88)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: ChristopherA on September 06, 2009, 08:39:47 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=296827.0;attach=337520;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=229906.0;attach=269020;image)
The width on Nasser in that shot is pretty amazing. Great pix posted, keep them coming. I have never really liked the hands clasps most muscular as much as the crab though.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: HTexan on September 06, 2009, 11:49:32 PM
because he didn't compared to better bbers.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 07, 2009, 12:16:31 AM
In 2000, Ronnie himself said that Nasser was always a major threat at the Olympia.

also after nasser's 6th place at the olympia 99 ronnie said something like "forget about nasser's 6th place, i am sure he will return again next year at his normal great shape to be a major threat"..
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 07, 2009, 12:22:25 AM
Well Sheriff I would say one dont go overboard here ;)

no man 96 too.. he was much better than dorian and the others.. dont tell me he was disqualified because my answer as you know will be jay 2001 :-X
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 07, 2009, 12:59:17 AM
hulkster i really want to ask you a serious question.. in your own opinion what are ronnie's weak points??.. plz dont ignore this question!

hulkster!! why havent you answered this very simple question? :-\ :-\ :-\
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 07, 2009, 06:26:19 AM
weak points? same as always - abs and calves. everything else is of such a high quality that well, its why he won 8 Mr. O's. 8)

Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 07, 2009, 06:30:05 AM
weak points? same as always - abs and calves. everything else is of such a high quality that well, its why he won 8 Mr. O's. 8)



do you mean his lower chest was ok with that clear gyno?????
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 07, 2009, 06:45:29 AM
ronnie's lower chest is amazing
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 07, 2009, 06:54:24 AM
GYNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO and dont say NO :P
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: mossel on September 07, 2009, 06:55:30 AM
Shall we talk about synthol now?
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 07, 2009, 12:18:11 PM
gyno crushes synthol:
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 07, 2009, 12:26:06 PM
gyno crushes synthol:
What is Nasser looking for there ? Maybe Sheriff in the crowd?
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 07, 2009, 12:29:56 PM
I dont know, but look how bloody awful dorian looks :o

worst ever double bi shot in the history of the mr. olympia contest..
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: hench on September 07, 2009, 01:30:43 PM
i agree after tearing that bi I dont see how he won. the double bi is probably the most important pose as it exposes all flaws and he clearly had one missing and of course symmetry was out the window. but for worse without injury i think that award goes to chris dickerson
I dont know, but look how bloody awful dorian looks :o

worst ever double bi shot in the history of the mr. olympia contest..
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Wiggs on September 07, 2009, 01:48:13 PM
Ronnie = 8
Nassole = 0
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Danimal77 on September 07, 2009, 02:22:11 PM
Aside from his back being the best ever, I really don't believe Dorian was deserving of his '96 and '97 wins. Dorian was his BEST in 1993 (YES, FAR better than he was in 1995).

Levrone, Ray and Nasser should all have beaten him for the title.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: dr.chimps on September 07, 2009, 02:23:26 PM
Ronnie = 8
Nassole = 0
Game over!
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: sculpture on September 07, 2009, 03:01:17 PM
gyno crushes synthol:

that photo of dorian is so bad its laughable


my god, the shame of the man


and the judges for that matter
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 07, 2009, 03:06:07 PM
Game over!
Shrieff wont be happy with this ;)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Grape Ape on September 07, 2009, 03:13:33 PM
no man 96 too.. he was much better than dorian and the others..

I went to that show.  You're absolutely incorrect.

Standing relaxed, Nasser looked incredible.  In fact, many thought he would challenge.  From the the side and back, it wasn't close.
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Hulkster on September 07, 2009, 04:01:44 PM
that photo of dorian is so bad its laughable


my god, the shame of the man


and the judges for that matter

the nuthuggers say the judges are correct and the pics all lie LOL

 ::)
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 07, 2009, 04:16:05 PM
i agree after tearing that bi I dont see how he won. the double bi is probably the most important pose as it exposes all flaws and he clearly had one missing and of course symmetry was out the window. but for worse without injury i think that award goes to chris dickerson

ironically chris dickerson too had a noticeable torn biceps in 1982 when he won the olympia!!..
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: mesmorph78 on September 07, 2009, 07:49:56 PM
Wolfs most muscular is a whole different pose to coleman, coleman is mainly focusing on flexing his chest and arms, whereas wolf is leaning more forward, raises his shoulders forward with his traps.. I like wolfs and ronnies. Ruhls is horrible, gunter does the arnold type, don't really like it. Dexter does the hammer dirt most muscular, he should try one with his palms facing up.
in regards to rhuls MM
no triceps?
spoils it for him nasser is good but also lacks in the tri mainly because his huge shoulders dwarf his arms
Title: Re: Why Nasser could never come close..
Post by: Armstrong on September 08, 2009, 05:35:31 AM
:-*

hi nasshuggers! :P

Nasser was awesome.  But not the BEST.  He still belongs with the greats.  But not Mr. O.