Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Hulkster on September 13, 2009, 10:05:18 AM
-
that they began to look like Ernie Taylors... :o :-\
-
that they began to look like Ernie Taylors... :o :-\
his arms were ridiculously big anyway
:S
-
But still placed Top-3 in "every" show...
Even with all the SEO he made it look good!
-
Just another black idiot.
-
got another shot. i think his arms were always ill ala ronnie and phil. shoulders for sure.
-
that they began to look like Ernie Taylors... :o :-\
Bitter cause they were bigger than Ronnies'?
-
that they began to look like Ernie Taylors... :o :-\
::) Sorry ! I dont see where the oil would be in those arms ! CALFs yes arms look perfectly legit !
-
that they began to look like Ernie Taylors... :o :-\
Not in his triceps his triceps were always exceptional
-
::) Sorry ! I dont see where the oil would be in those arms ! CALFs yes arms look perfectly legit !
when he stands next to someone with legit arms, its immediately obvious. the delts especially..
-
these puppies rival Nasser's for their lubrication.. :'(
-
when he stands next to someone with legit arms, its immediately obvious. the delts especially..
I agree about the delts !
-
Even I doubt he didn't abuse synthol now. :o
-
Some of the best arms ever even if did oil them up ;)
-
those arms look pretty good, who cares if he uses syn
-
its ok for ronnie to inject his calves with oil, but not flex in the delts?
-
its ok for ronnie to inject his calves with oil, but not flex in the delts?
show us the proof that ronnie injects his calves ::).
you won't find any.
his calves have always been shitty and smallish for his quads. from the beginning of his career to the end.
if he injected them, they would have looked totally different. and got massive drastically pre injection to post injection..
they never did.
why? because he never injected them.
its really very simple.
-
notice: even going from 247 in 98 to 304 in 2004 pounds, there is only a slight increase in size.
injecting them would have made a huge difference..
argument (a stupid one to begin with) shot down as always..
-
he was at his all time biggest during the 2004 gp circuit.
301 or 305 I think.
probably the biggest quads ever for in contest shape. biggest back ever. maybe even biggest arms too.
-
notice: even going from 247 in 98 to 304 in 2004 pounds, there is only a slight increase in size.
injecting them would have made a huge difference..
argument (a stupid one to begin with) shot down as always..
owned as always:
(http://digilander.libero.it/gruppociak/rc159.jpg)
-
those arms look pretty good, who cares if he uses syn
This kind of issue cracks me up.
The guy had an incredible pro physique and maybe a couple pics look a tad bit odd, but wtf.
Name me one time that a rule against synthol was ever enforced and they disqualified a guy?
Thought so....if they don't enforece any rules on any banned substances what difference does it make, c'mon.
-
no one said he should be disqualified or said his physique sucks.
but the fact is, oil inflated arms look horrible. just look at late career nasser, 99 flex or ernie.
when the flex their arms, its obvious and looks horrible.
-
no one said he should be disqualified or said his physique sucks.
but the fact is, oil inflated arms look horrible. just look at late career nasser, 99 flex or ernie.
when the flex their arms, its obvious and looks horrible.
They all use SEO at that level even your love interest , whats the problem?
-
owned as always:
(http://digilander.libero.it/gruppociak/rc159.jpg)
one year earlier, and they look the same.
so much for your injection theory LOL
like I said, you won't find any evidence.
its amazing how badly you fail.
-
ps if you want to see once again, what faked calves look like compared real ones, compare ronnie and flex in the shot. notice the detail in ronnie's left calf. you find none flex's..
-
They all use SEO at that level even your love interest , whats the problem?
ronnie has never used it.
the pics throughout his career show this quite easily.
saying he did it anyway and was able to hide it is pure bullshit.
-
ronnie has never used it.
the pics throughout his career show this quite easily.
saying he did it anyway and was able to hide it is pure bullshit.
hahahaha they all use it , has goodrum hijacked your account?
-
why do you assume they all use it?
its not like gh or roids. ie its not necessary to compete at that level.
if anything, as we all know, it makes them look WORSE.
-
why do you assume they all use it?
its not like gh or roids. ie its not necessary to compete at that level.
if anything, as we all know, it makes them look WORSE.
overdoing it makes them look worse I agree but it is another tool in there bag, they all use the same stuff to get ahead as its all about being better than the next guy, obviously at the end if all things are equal with conditioning etc the guy with the surperior genes will win.Hence why Ronnie conquered but to think he is not using the same tools as everyone else is closing your eyes.
Only the guys that overdo it or bugger it up show signs of oil abuse.
-
I think its a mistake to assume that synthol/oils are a tool that everyone uses.
yes, everyone uses GH, roids, weights, foods, supplements etc.
thats how its always been.
but synthol is still relatively new (since what, 96ish?)
no reason to think that most aren't training to gain size like they have always been doing.
assuming they are all taking the easy way out is far fetched.
esp. with all the problems (remember Milos?) that it can cause.
-
I think its a mistake to assume that synthol/oils are a tool that everyone uses.
yes, everyone uses GH, roids, weights, foods, supplements etc.
thats how its always been.
but synthol is still relatively new (since what, 96ish?)
no reason to think that most aren't training to gain size like they have always been doing.
assuming they are all taking the easy way out is far fetched.
esp. with all the problems (remember Milos?) that it can cause.
Yes around the mid 90s it started,,these guys have little regard for there health , look at what they are pumping into them selves.Of course training is always the base along with diet and drugs but to add the finishing touches alot turn to oil.
If done correctly most of time you cant tell but its a fine line..
You are correct though I cant say "all" are doing it as I dont have proof or are watching these guys 24/7 but it is in use and does look disgusting when overdone or buggered up
-
Ronnie used it in his calves.
-
nope. no proof.
in fact, the pics across his career indicate the exact opposite.
if he had blow then up with synthol, they would have been a lot bigger than this.
and look: compare 99 to 04. no real size increase.
his calves sucked, always did. but he didn't blow em up.
-
^
see. the pics show the opposite.
if you are going to make an accusation, at least make it one that is remotely supportable.
thanks 8)
-
.
-
Delts, yes, Flex was doing the Escilene thing back in the day---he said he used a T-formation on them, so it wouldn't be a stretch for him to then use synthol or what ever. And in 1999 and 2000 when he flexed, his delt heads didn't jump out. Shawn Ray, said he looked like he had been stung by bees. to me, it shows how desperate Flex was--how he knew he misssed his window to be Mr. O
-
This kind of issue cracks me up.
The guy had an incredible pro physique and maybe a couple pics look a tad bit odd, but wtf.
Name me one time that a rule against synthol was ever enforced and they disqualified a guy?
Thought so....if they don't enforece any rules on any banned substances what difference does it make, c'mon.
Bodybuilding is a great sport. Muscles for nothing.
-
and today his arms resemble smaller versions of Valvolino's.
well, actually that's a stretch. They kinda look like sandbags just hanging there.
(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/flextoday.jpg)
-
.... he looks homo...
-
no steroids=skinny neck...
-
(http://anabolicminds.com/forum/attachments/pro-bodybuilding/20954d1208208863-bunch-crazy-pro-flex_wheeler_021.jpg)
(http://www.mostmuscular.com/2003-events/2003-ironman-pro/named/700-Flex_Wheeler_23.jpg)
He filled himself with oil, and seemingly did not know when to stop.
-
Brutal width
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=297680.0;attach=338718;image)
-
Ronnie used it in his calves.
;D
-
I think he has a fake kidney now too.
-
Flex was the only person who can be full of oil and STILL look good! Case in point, BFTO '99. 8)
-
yeah, he looked good in that show.
but real muscle ala Ronnie always looks better: 8)
-
everybody talks about his long muscle bellies, yet his vastus lateralis muscle doesn't extend anywhere near his knee
tiny chest too
(http://www.mostmuscular.com/2003-events/2003-ironman-pro/named/700-Flex_Wheeler_23.jpg)
E
-
Flex's arms looked nothing like Ernie Taylor's... Assuming Flex has oil in there, he did a much better job then Ernie did!
-
ernie was an extreme example, but flex was on the way to that appearance, but stopped thankfully long before that..
-
Good thing Ronnie didn't use Synthol anywhere else other than his calves
-
Good thing Ronnie didn't use Synthol anywhere else other than his calves
Are you saying that Ronnie's traps would be bigger with oil use?
-
Good thing Ronnie didn't use Synthol anywhere else other than his calves
lol
-
Flex actually had one of the most symmetrical and massive physiques of all time. For some reason he never one the O. ND or Hulkster can you explain? When I see his pics most of the time he outclasses anyone onstage...WTF?
-
lol
Do you think he used Escliene as well ???
-
Good thing Ronnie didn't use Synthol anywhere else other than his calves
100% natural ( hard work , it's hard work getting the cap off the bottle of Pump-N-Pose )
-
Flex actually had one of the most symmetrical and massive physiques of all time. For some reason he never one the O. ND or Hulkster can you explain? When I see his pics most of the time he outclasses anyone onstage...WTF?
He never brought the right combo to the Olympia stage , his best year ( 1993 ) he reeked havoc on the spring shows and by the time of the Olympia he was slightly off
1998 the consensus was he lost because Ronnie had ripped glutes and sharper hams . his physique at it's best is exceptional one of the very best ever seen in the sport .
-
100% natural ( hard work , it's hard work getting the cap off the bottle of Pump-N-Pose )
Are you saying Hulkster talks shit about Dorian to distract everyone from noticing that Ronnie abused Synthol and Escliene in the calves and possibly in other body parts, ND?
-
Are you saying Hulkster talks shit about Dorian to distract everyone from noticing that Ronnie abused Synthol and Escliene in the calves and possibly in other body parts, ND?
hahahahahahaha he thinks by tearing Dorian down this helps his case somehow , funny Ronnie has immense respect for Dorian for a good reason , to bad his fan-boys can't see why
-
100% natural ( hard work , it's hard work getting the cap off the bottle of Pump-N-Pose )
Pffffttt... Look at the rest of the leg development... His whole leg and glute looks more developed. I guess he synthol'd his quads, glutes, and hams too?
-
no oil in flex's arms
-
THE PURPOSE OF LIFE IS NOT TEMPORARY ENJOYMENT ...GOD CREATED THE UNIVERSE AND IS THE CAUSE OF IT...THE UNIVERSE COULD NOT CREATE ITSELF....GOD COMMUNICATED TO US THROUGH TORAH, THEN BIBLE THEN QURAN TO GUIDE US TO WHAT OUR TRUE PURPOSE OF LIFE IS...tHAT IS TO FORM A RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM BASED ON GOOD DEEDS AND PRAYER...YOU CAN STILL BODYBUILD AS A HOBBY BUT YOUR ULTIMATE PURPOSE OF LIFE IS THE SAME AS THE EVERY OTHER HUMAN....EXISTENCE OF GOD IS THROUGH LOGIC....THE WAY TO OBEY HIM IS THROUGH REVELATION.THIS LIFE IS TEMPORARY ENJOYMENT
-
that they began to look like Ernie Taylors... :o :-\
He had one of THE smallest chest in the history of bodybuilding.
-
when he stands next to someone with legit arms, its immediately obvious. the delts especially..
WOW, Cormier had some SERIOUS gyno in 1999. :-X :-X :-X
-
he was at his all time biggest during the 2004 gp circuit.
301 or 305 I think.
probably the biggest quads ever for in contest shape. biggest back ever. maybe even biggest arms too.
And you have the biggest hard on for all this BIG bodyparts, don't you? :-*
-
Pffffttt... Look at the rest of the leg development... His whole leg and glute looks more developed. I guess he synthol'd his quads, glutes, and hams too?
Yet his calves grew and guess what? NO ' development ' seem fishy?
-
I think its a mistake to assume that synthol/oils are a tool that everyone uses.
yes, everyone uses GH, roids, weights, foods, supplements etc.
thats how its always been.
but synthol is still relatively new (since what, 96ish?)
Manfred Hoeberl was using it in 1991-1994 in HEAVY dosages.
-
Pffffttt... Look at the rest of the leg development... His whole leg and glute looks more developed. I guess he synthol'd his quads, glutes, and hams too?
exactly. and the calves don't even show any signs of synthol use to start with.
never have. ever.
its stupid.
-
Yet his calves grew and guess what? NO ' development ' seem fishy?
are you for real? ::)
hey check it out: dorian's arms grew and guess what? NO development.
must be synthol LOL
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
get real.
-
exactly. and the calves don't even show any signs of synthol use to start with.
never have. ever.
its stupid.
Actually they do , they fluctuate in size and they lack ANY development sans soleus , I mean Shawn Ray has high calves but they were fully developed , Ronnie's not so . this would be evidence
-
Actually they do , they fluctuate in size and they lack ANY development sans soleus , I mean Shawn Ray has high calves but they were fully developed , Ronnie's not so . this would be evidence
no, since they never had any detail to begin with even back in 1992 pre synthol days.
holy cow your an idiot. :o
-
they fluctuate in size
LMAO
oh really?
here is ronnie at 257 and 305 taken 5 years apart.
yeah, nice fluctation in size LOL
::) ::) ::)
this keeps getting better and better!
-
^
hahaha look at that LOL
nice synthol work ronnie.
next time, try and actually INJECT the stuff LOL
::)
-
no, since they never had any detail to begin with even back in 1992 pre synthol days.
holy cow your an idiot. :o
Hahahahaha yet they grew in size all the while never developing yeah sure ya right and they fluctuated in size too nice try , when Flex hooked Ronnie up with The Chad I think the guru help Ronnie out with more than plasma expanders
and yet you claimed Ronnie has more detail in his calves than Dorian did ;) owned oppppsssss forgot about that one huh? ;D
-
yet they grew in size all the while never developing yeah sure ya right
you do realize that lots of bb's have muscles that get larger while not showing good development.
see your hero's twigs for example:
well, there you have it folks.
according to Flowerboy's fucked up logic, dorian yates must have oiled up his arms.. ::)
-
ND must be embarassed his argument about ronnie's calves is so bad..
-
ND must be embarassed his argument about ronnie's calves is so bad..
Again what happened he has no details in his calves yet he had more detail than Dorian ever did ? ;)
-
no one said he should be disqualified or said his physique sucks.
but the fact is, oil inflated arms look horrible. just look at late career nasser, 99 flex or ernie.
when the flex their arms, its obvious and looks horrible.
I agree! In fact any extreme , drug bloated muscle looks worse to me than harder "less drugged" muscle.
Look at the guys like Zane or Arnold, sure they juiced , but the muscle seemed to look harder when they flexed. Most modern pros would look BETTER at lighter body wts and with less extreme juice regimes.
Best modern example is how great Ronnie looked at 250-260 wt. He was ripped to shreds , small waist, wicked separation in upper arms, quads and back, etc.
Poor Nasser looked ridiculous when he used synthol
-
you do realize that lots of bb's have muscles that get larger while not showing good development.
see your hero's twigs for example:
well, there you have it folks.
according to Flowerboy's fucked up logic, dorian yates must have oiled up his arms.. ::)
nice deflection to Dorian , we're not talking about Dorian
we're talking about Ronnie's calves which got bigger and yet have NO details in them as you claim , but you also claimed they have more detail than Dorians ;) you're not getting out of this one dummy ;)
-
if you recall you moron, I posted that comment simply as a challenge you to prove it.
and it took you dozens of posts to do it.
-
nice deflection to Dorian , we're not talking about Dorian
sure we are. because your fucked up logic that you are applying to ronnie can just as easily be applied to dorian to show you how stupid that logic is.
its called illustrating a point that you are totally missing.. :-\
-
sure we are. because your fucked up logic that you are applying to ronnie can just as easily be applied to dorian to show you how stupid that logic is.
its called illustrating a point that you are totally missing.. :-\
Again make up your mind does he have NO detail to begin with or does he have more detail than Dorian ;) you're not escaping your bullshit idiot
his calves fluctuated in size your claim was that's natural with fluctuations in bodyweight , yet here is a pic of him at 280 pounds and obvious his calves are smaller than ever which proves your theory is bullshit
-
if you recall you moron, I posted that comment simply as a challenge you to prove it.
and it took you dozens of posts to do it.
hahahahahahaha epic bullshit I laughed at the absurdity of the claim and explained I didn't need to prove it
-
hahahahahahaha epic bullshit I laughed at the absurdity of the claim and explained I didn't need to prove it
nope, sorry. I can bring up the posts if you like, but I have better things to do, like own your ass with this great comparison of ronnie's 'synthol calves' LOL
::)
look how much oil he injected into them! they are huge in 04 compared to 1996!
its all oil! oil = size! oil = the lazy way out for ronnie's calves
oh wait...they are the same, they weren't injected at all...
LOL
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
-
Brutal width
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=297680.0;attach=338718;image)
Yep, yet he beat Nasser that night...Of course one could look at Nasser and say "Brutal Shape" ::)
-
Post pics of Ronnie's last Olympia. He def had synthol in his calves.
-
nope, sorry. I can bring up the posts if you like, but I have better things to do, like own your ass with this great comparison of ronnie's 'synthol calves' LOL
::)
look how much oil he injected into them! they are huge in 04 compared to 1996!
its all oil! oil = size! oil = the lazy way out for ronnie's calves
oh wait...they are the same, they weren't injected at all...
LOL
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
same old Hulkster post a pic and say ' see '
they're not the same , if by same you mean glossed over looking with no detail sure , wait a minute you claimed he had more detail in his calves than Dorian ;)
-
The same size you claim? my ass a dramatic increase in size from 97 to 98 and still no development what so ever to speak of ;D gee I wonder what that could be you do the math
-
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=27897
apparently other people feel Ronnie is injecting himself ;D
Ronnie Coleman: uses it strictly in his calves because he has very high calves like a number of the black athletes
on Flex which rings true with Ronnie
Of course, his calves were probably the first thing he did. They don’t look good because they just do not flex and they have no definition.
-
lol love your 'project pics'
what exactly is that supposed to show? that his calves didn't change much? cause thats what they show.
thats not what happens when you blow up a muscle with oil.
seriously, your 'proof' is hilarious, because it shows the exact opposite of what you are trying to prove.
::)
-
hey ND, wasn't Ronnie supposed to have injected his calves at the end of his career?
hey guess what? from 99 to the end, they looked virtually the same.
so much for synthol ::)
this is so easy.,
-
the thing is that Ronnie was NEVER marked down for his calves
-
try and get some actual shots that show he might have used it if you are going to argue something as stupid as this..
so far, everything points to the fact that he DIDNT.
have fun.
-
the thing is that Ronnie was NEVER marked down for his calves
cause they were natural ie no oil.
-
Okay, back to Flex's arms...here he is in 1993, with no oil.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ses-S3pG0HY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ses-S3pG0HY)
-
hey ND, wasn't Ronnie supposed to have injected his calves at the end of his career?
hey guess what? from 99 to the end, they looked virtually the same.
so much for synthol ::)
this is so easy.,
NO I never said at the end of his career ;) look at the difference between 1997 and 1999 he ain't Gustavo and this ain't 100% natural ( hard work )
and Hulkster what happened I though he had more detail in his calves than Dorian did ;D and yet you're now claiming he has none ???
Ronnie Coleman: uses it strictly in his calves because he has very high calves like a number of the black athletes
hahahahahahaha next.................
-
Okay, back to Flex's arms...here he is in 1993, with no oil.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ses-S3pG0HY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ses-S3pG0HY)
His arms are oil free and insane !!
-
lol love your 'project pics'
what exactly is that supposed to show? that his calves didn't change much? cause thats what they show.
thats not what happens when you blow up a muscle with oil.
seriously, your 'proof' is hilarious, because it shows the exact opposite of what you are trying to prove.
::)
a dramatic increase in size with NO separation & detail that means something was injected into them ;)
guys like Shawn Ray have small high calves yet they are fully developed not so with Ronnie ever wonder why?
Ronnie Coleman: uses it strictly in his calves because he has very high calves like a number of the black athletes
-
are you arguing that there is a drastic increase in size between these two shots? ???
Are you stupid? there isn't much of a difference except some detail, which of course, is the same with the glutes and hams. by your line of thinking, he must have injected the glutes and hams too.. ::) Ronnie 99 was sliced. Ronnie 97 wasn't.
what is your point?
you think this shows synthol use in his calves? LOL
::)
ND, honestly, you are hitting a new low for desperate stupidity.
we all know you want to take the cheap shots, but at least try and make it something you can actually argue. your evidence is showing the exact opposite of what you are trying to show.
here is a hint: it isnt working.
-
are you arguing that there is a drastic increase in size between these two shots? ???
Are you stupid? there isn't much of a difference except some detail, which of course, is the same with the glutes and hams. by your line of thinking, he must have injected the glutes and hams too.. ::) Ronnie 99 was sliced. Ronnie 97 wasn't.
what is your point?
you think this shows synthol use in his calves? LOL
::)
ND, honestly, you are hitting a new low for desperate stupidity.
we all know you want to take the cheap shots, but at least try and make it something you can actually argue. your evidence is showing the exact opposite of what you are trying to show.
here is a hint: it isnt working.
I love when you meltdown all you can do is go on the offensive with personal attacks because you can't and never have been able to make a cognizant argument .
there is a dramatic increase in size between the years and unlike the hams and glutes his calves show absolutely NO detail . you do the math increase in size with no detail or development , the same glossy look as Flex's delts I know it pains you but hey
Ronnie Coleman: uses it strictly in his calves because he has very high calves like a number of the black athlete
-
Hulkster's posts have convinced me. Can't believe Ronnie used Synthol :(
Hulkster, do you think he used Synthol in other body parts too ???
-
Hulkster's posts have convinced me. Can't believe Ronnie used Synthol :(
Hulkster, do you think he used Synthol in other body parts too ???
We are waitng for the DNA results
-
there is a dramatic increase in size between the years and unlike the hams and glutes his calves show absolutely NO detail
1. ronnie's whole body increased dramatically in size, calves not as much, but an increase in size is to be expected when you gain 50 pounds of muscle..duh. ::)
there was never a massive blow up in the calves from one year to the next. your pics keep proving that quite well. thanks. keep up the good work.
2. ronnie's calves never showed much detail in most shots. ever.
are you saying he used synthol back in 1991 too then? cause that is what you are suggesting since they weren't very detailed back then either. think about what you are saying.... ::)
::)
think about what you are saying. none of this even remotely suggests he used synthol in his calves.
none.
-
ND is saying that a guy who has had smallish and low detail calves from 1991 to 2007 must have used synthol since synthol came around in 1996 and his calves had little detail from 96 onward...
what about from 91 to the dawn of synthol then?
pre synthol synthol?
LOL
this is so fucking stupid.. ::)
as you can see, having shitty calves with low detail your whole career does not mean you must have used synthol.
it just meant you had shitty calves.
oil has nothing to do with it.
-
I see ND knows he's defeated and now won't touch this thread with a 10 foot pole.
the same thing happened in the truce thread.
-
I see ND knows he's defeated and now won't touch this thread with a 10 foot pole.
the same thing happened in the truce thread.
Boooooooooooooooommmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ;D
Ronnie Coleman: uses it strictly in his calves because he has very high calves like a number of the black athletes
-
ND is saying that a guy who has had smallish and low detail calves from 1991 to 2007 must have used synthol since synthol came around in 1996 and his calves had little detail from 96 onward...
what about from 91 to the dawn of synthol then?
pre synthol synthol?
LOL
this is so fucking stupid.. ::)
as you can see, having shitty calves with low detail your whole career does not mean you must have used synthol.
it just meant you had shitty calves.
oil has nothing to do with it.
meltdown btw ;D
Ronnie Coleman: uses it strictly in his calves because he has very high calves like a number of the black athletes
-
lol so now a quote means ronnie used synthol when every comparison of pics shows he didn't LOL
::)
you always amaze..in a bad way.
-
lol so now a quote means ronnie used synthol when every comparison of pics shows he didn't LOL
::)
you always amaze..in a bad way.
oh the old cry ' look at the pics ' the pics show calves that fluctuate in size and never show any development or detail hahahahahahahahaha once again Hulkster denying the experts ;D
you always deny nothing new
Ronnie Coleman: uses it strictly in his calves because he has very high calves like a number of the black athletes
-
Hulkster's posts have convinced me. Can't believe Ronnie used Synthol :(
Hulkster, do you think he used Synthol in other body parts too ???
Hulkster speak on this , where else do you think he injected himself?
-
Sorry, anyone thinking he injected his calves is just fucking retarded or is just goading you, which you obviously fall right into because of your blind fanboyism for Coleman.
His calves have sucked, always did and showed no improvement other than getting bigger like the rest of his body did. Some people have shitty calf genetics and obviously Ron was probably the worst ever.
The arguments for it were obviously so weak that any 5 year old could have seen right through them. I'm truly amazed you let this go on for as long as it did. This has to go down as one of the most epic entrapments into meltdown ever.
-
Sorry, anyone thinking he injected his calves is just fucking retarded
all of these guys are willing to inject anything, especially a lagging bodypart.
-
all of these guys are willing to inject anything, especially a lagging bodypart.
I'm not saying they aren't. Just that his calves show zero evidence that they were injected with synthol. That shit stays in you for years. Look at how long it took Milos to get his arms back after his debacle with it. If ronnie injected synthol they would have stayed inflated for quite a while which just isn't the case.
Maybe he used some form of inflamatory agent like caberjet or something, but definitely not synthol.
-
I'm not saying they aren't. Just that his calves show zero evidence that they were injected with synthol. That shit stays in you for years. Look at how long it took Milos to get his arms back after his debacle with it. If ronnie injected synthol they would have stayed inflated for quite a while which just isn't the case.
Maybe he used some form of inflamatory agent like caberjet or something, but definitely not synthol.
mm.. i think it depends on how much you inject, and how often. i think small amounts of synthol would give temporary swelling/inflammation.. like a shot of prop.. or whatever.. and add a low level of mass over time. I think some of the shots where his calves are smooth/larger proves he injected something.. I just cant believe a pro would not do anything he could to bring up a weak bodypart... they all use the oil to some extent.. ronnies calves were so bad, what could he really do? if he used large amounts of oil in his calves it would be too obvious.. (like flex ::)) but i think he used as much of whatever he could without going too far. but who knows what he injected (probably everything :D)
guys like milos (or nasser or whoever) went way the fuck overboard..
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=297680.0;attach=338973;image)
pretty obvious *enhancement* of the calves in this picture.
-
Sorry, anyone thinking he injected his calves is just fucking retarded
His calves have sucked, always did and showed no improvement other than getting bigger like the rest of his body did. Some people have shitty calf genetics and obviously Ron was probably the worst ever.
The arguments for it were obviously so weak that any 5 year old could have seen right through them. I'm truly amazed you let this go on for as long as it did. This has to go down as one of the most epic entrapments into meltdown ever.
well said. the nuthuggers are so dumb and stupid it boggles the mind.,..
-
The arguments for it were obviously so weak that any 5 year old could have seen right through them
hey ND, how old are you? we must know now 8)
-
I don't understand the obsession with synthol...with the amount of anabolics suspended in oil taken and site injected why even bother with synthol. I seriously doubt there is that much synthol use around. I remember when I was using gear many moons ago and my calves grew 3 inches and I never even trained the damn things (in the space of only a few months). Good gear is exactly that - why add extra oil. Makes no sense to me.
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=297680.0;attach=338973;image)
pretty obvious *enhancement* of the calves in this picture.
The problem is to get them that obvious you have to use quite a bit and it stays in for quite a while. I dunno, I think it was probably something else and not synthol, but who really knows, it's not really all important in the grand scheme of things.
-
it's not really all important in the grand scheme of things.
I totally agree...
(http://www.nakedinwater.com/thumbs/8877.jpg)
I enjoy looking at this girl..
-
^
synthol tits ;D
-
Sorry, anyone thinking he injected his calves is just fucking retarded or is just goading you, which you obviously fall right into because of your blind fanboyism for Coleman.
His calves have sucked, always did and showed no improvement other than getting bigger like the rest of his body did. Some people have shitty calf genetics and obviously Ron was probably the worst ever.
The arguments for it were obviously so weak that any 5 year old could have seen right through them. I'm truly amazed you let this go on for as long as it did. This has to go down as one of the most epic entrapments into meltdown ever.
;D
-
well said. the nuthuggers are so dumb and stupid it boggles the mind.,..
moron he's talking ABOUT you and how dumb you are ;)
-
well said. the nuthuggers are so dumb and stupid it boggles the mind.,..
Bump for Hulkster calling people dumb when in fact the post is exposing how stupid he is ;D
Hulkster = MattT ;)