Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Stark on October 02, 2009, 03:59:23 AM
-
Arnold is just THE fucking man
At a time when these weak fucking celebrities demand that Roman Polanski a Child rapist should be let free - because hes just such an important person ::) (I focking hated the piano - arty fancy pancy fuck off)
Arnold said it like it is..
He said he shouldn't be treated any different then any other person who is/was charged with such a crime.
HOW THE FUCK!!!! can these hollywood no good rich spoiled fucking pukes be on the side of a Child rapist? If he would be a nobody they would want him hanged...I MAKES SO ANGRY I'M GOING TO SACRAFICE A NEWBORN PUPPY AND DRINK HIS BLOOD!!!!!
http://The US authorities want Polanski to be extradited but international opposition has arisen, with some of Hollywood's most famous names and high-ranking politicians in France, where he lives, questioning the wisdom of the move
Hes a childrapist for fucks sake - whats wise about that move? Well for a starter he cannot do it again.
http://Whoopi Goldberg, star of The Color Purple and Sister Act, said: "I know it wasn't rape-rape. I think it was something else, but I don't believe it was rape-rape.
hahah basicly she said it was suprise sex - it wasn't rape rape ::) what the fuck is that? So it was rape but it wasn't? Oh yeah shows you again if the person accused of a crime is too well known the crime becomes negotiable.
Peter Fonda, the actor, who was in Zurich for a film festival, said international authorities had better things to focus on than catching Roman Polanski.
Like what? he ran from the law for far too long - how the fuck did he get away with it in the first place.. I applaud the Switz athority.
Fonda told local radio Wednesday that "we should have been celebrating the arrest of Osama bin Laden and not the arrest of Polanski."
What a dumb fuck
Fonda says Polanski "is not responsible for killing anyone" and noted that the victim has asked for the case to be dismissed.
Oh its alright folks - you can rape little children all you want - just don't kill'em that wouldn't be nice :( - and yeah you dumb fuck the victim has asked for the case to be dismissed because she probably finally managed to have a "normal" life and doesn't want to be dragged through the dirt - sounds plausible? not to Fonda ::)
Paul Petersen, president of A Minor Consideration, a group which protects young actors, said: "The Hollywood community is protecting Roman Polanski. It makes me crazy."
I tell you what we all should do BOYCOT the fuck of anybody who makes a movie and defended that asshole - fuck these rich fucks.
(http://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/rapist1.jpg?w=468&h=409)
-
Roman made Rosemary's Baby - great dude...
-
The incident was more than 30 years ago and the "victim", a drugged under-aged model who had sex with him willingly, has forgiven him in public already for decades. It was no rape, it's just that sex with minors in the US was (or still is?) declarated a rape automatically.
Why the drama?.... ::)
-
The incident was more than 30 years ago and the "victim" has forgiven him in public already for decades.
Why the drama?.... ::)
I couldn't care less about Polanski - WHAT MAKES MY BLOOD BOIL - are these fucking spoiled rich hollywood cunts that want to protect his ass.
Fuck'em - hollywood and all the celebrity shit and everything that comes with it is an abomintation and needs to go.
-
Roman made Rosemary's Baby - great dude...
Roman probably fucked Rosemarys baby
-
>:( if it were my kid . Id kill the f--k . He is and was a piece of shit .
-
Hollywood cu nts think they can get away with anything...off with his head! >:(
-
Hollywood cu nts think they can get away with anything...off with his head! >:(
I'm with Wiggles. He had sex with an underage chick, who was on drugs (he probably supplied) if the avg guy did that he would be getting anally raped by the whole cellblock for 10 yrs. no homo.
-
He had anal sex with a drugged underage kid,if some of you think thats ok,then you need some serious help.
-
let him suffer the consequences.. IF it wasn't such a big deal why didn't he deal with it at the time. The authorities got it right this time.
-
Ok, We've got rampant sex slavery going on right now in some places in Europe and they are going after this guy? Nice way to divert attention away from your own failures, European authorities.
-
Ok, We've got rampant sex slavery going on right now in some places in Europe and they are going after this guy? Nice way to divert attention away from your own failures, European authorities.
Yes, they should ignore his wrong because that will help out..... how about just go after all the scum?
-
I couldn't care less about Polanski - WHAT MAKES MY BLOOD BOIL - are these fucking spoiled rich hollywood cunts that want to protect his ass.
Fuck'em - hollywood and all the celebrity shit and everything that comes with it is an abomintation and needs to go.
Stark
what do you expect
they are fucking Libs
-
That's not Craig Titus.
-
Stark
what do you expect
they are fucking Libs
I'm a lib and I'd beat your pussy ass into the ground and not even say sorry
-
That's not Craig Titus.
did he died yet?
-
concerning the circumstances that time, maybe not the most average 13 year old girl who may have wanted the cock and so. i think labelling him as a child rapist is a bit harsh.
-
If it wasn't Polanski, nobody would care and nobody would know.
Being famous does not help, it's a burden.
-
they should have locked him up 30 years ago. He drugged and has sex with a 7th grader.
-
Guy's a genius, no doubt, but he butt-farked a 13 year-old! 13 years old, dude!
-
I'm a lib and I'd beat your pussy ass into the ground and not even say sorry
I am a republican
And I would simply hire someone to break your legs
-
I am a republican
And I would simply hire someone to break your legs
LOL. Probably have to contract an illegal immigrant. No Americans would stoop to leg-breaking these days.
-
but sometimes a 13 year old doesnt look like an 13 year old, how many black girls doesnt have big tits on that age and love the cock?
-
concerning the circumstances that time, maybe not the most average 13 year old girl who may have wanted the cock and so. i think labelling him as a child rapist is a bit harsh.
You nuts?
Oh its you mars
-
LOL. Probably have to contract an illegal immigrant. No Americans would stoop to leg-breaking these days.
but chimpo
I am all for hiring, helps the economy
the economy will arise once again
upon the shoulders of the small businessman
-
The hollywood elite disgust me. Think they are above the law, think they can tell others how to live, talk their elitist liberal utopian philosophies because they are already rich and taken care of.
Bullshit. Polanski committed statutory rape and ran from US prosecutors. He has to be punished. I agree that consentual statutory rape should have a different punishment than forced statutory rape, but either way this guy needs to pay for his crime. Hats off to Arnold for speaking truth.
-
Once you hear the details of the case, its pretty much cut and dry. The girl was 13 and he was 40...fucking piece of shit living the life of the rich and famous should be behind bars.
-
Shit! The fucking cops are here!
(http://www.timesofmalta.com/media/serve/20090928--101208-wor_07.jpg)
-
nasty shit ...
Switzerland lost its neutrality with this debacle ;)
-
The hollywood elite disgust me. Think they are above the law, think they can tell others how to live, talk their elitist liberal utopian philosophies because they are already rich and taken care of.
Bullshit. Polanski committed statutory rape and ran from US prosecutors. He has to be punished. I agree that consentual statutory rape should have a different punishment than forced statutory rape, but either way this guy needs to pay for his crime. Hats off to Arnold for speaking truth.
i dont know about that, like someone already said being famous does not necessary help, sometimes its a burden.
-
Fuck Pedolanski... Hail to Awwnold!
-
but how did she look? maybe you little tits would have fucked her yourself
-
NO, 13 is far too young. Its a good thing he got bust.
-
Once you hear the details of the case, its pretty much cut and dry. The girl was 13 and he was 40...fucking piece of shit living the life of the rich and famous should be behind bars.
not only was she 13, but he also drugged her up first! the guy is a piece of shit and I can't wait for him to go to a cali jail and this time he will be the one getting raped. let's see if whoopi goldberg calls that "rape-rape."
-
djeez maybe she didnt cooperated very well, its a logic thing you use something to drug her right.
-
Bullshit. Polanski committed statutory rape and ran from US prosecutors. He has to be punished. I agree that consentual statutory rape should have a different punishment than forced statutory rape, but either way this guy needs to pay for his crime. Hats off to Arnold for speaking truth.
She's 13, drugged and at that age you don't know "right" from "wrong."
He is 40 at the time? He clearly KNOWS what SHOULD be "right" and "wrong." Obviously did not care either way...even being a well known Hollywood icon he can get legal pussy any time he wants. He just happened to choose the drugged 13 year old...and that's one we know about.
If it was OK for him to commit this act, whether it was consenting or not, why did he run to foreign soil where he could not be brought back to US soil? An act of guilt?
I'm with shootfighter on this...the case is cut and dry, open/shut. I do not think for a second there is any grey area here, at all.
-
According to the transcripts posted on www.thesmokinggun.com it was NOT consensual.
According to the transcripts:
Earlier he photographed her and had her to take off her top.
Later he gave her alcohol and part of a quaalude.
He took more photographs of her in her underwear.
She made up having asthma because she wanted to go home ...she said she had to take her medicine.
He kissed her and she said no, she wanted to go home.
Then he performed cunnilingus on her while she was saying no. She called it "cuddliness"--she was 13.
Then he started raping her while she was saying no.
Then he asked her if she was on the pill..she said no. He asked her if she wanted him to "go in through her back." She said no.
Then he raped her in her anus.
Then someone came to the door so he went to the door and opened it a little and talked to them. The girl put on her underwear and started to walk toward the door.
He sat her back down and finished raping her in the anus.
-
According to the transcripts posted on www.thesmokinggun.com it was NOT consensual.
According to the transcripts:
Earlier he photographed her and had her to take off her top.
Later he gave her alcohol and part of a quaalude.
He took more photographs of her in her underwear.
She made up having asthma because she wanted to go home ...she said she had to take her medicine.
He kissed her and she said no, she wanted to go home.
Then he performed cunnilingus on her while she was saying no. She called it "cuddliness"--she was 13.
Then he started raping her while she was saying no.
Then he asked her if she was on the pill..she said no. He asked her if she wanted him to "go in through her back." She said no.
Then he raped her in her anus.
Then someone came to the door so he went to the door and opened it a little and talked to them. The girl put on her underwear and started to walk toward the door.
He sat her back down and finished raping her in the anus.
I wonder how many of the tough guys in the thread would think the above scenario was ok if it was their 13 yr old daughter?
-
I wonder how many of the tough guys in the thread would think the above scenario was ok if it was their 13 yr old daughter?
I saw Debra Winger defending him and was wondering the same thing about her...what if it would have been her daughter? What if it would have even been her mother as an adult? It was RAPE....not consensual.
Apparently he admitted it and fled the country the next day.
I'd post what a 13 year old girl looks like but decided against it.
Here is a 13 year old boy. Looks like a little BOY. She was a 13 year old little girl.
-
I thought there was a photo of Arnold fucking Polanski
-
There was a documentary on this called 'Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired.' It was pretty interesting. Talked to all the principal characters and generally pushed a pro-Polanski agenda. He comes off as a classic narcissist, and the legal system that tried to convict him takes a real beating as it is/was revealed to be shambling and incompetent. I think it's still on the movie channels. Worth a watch, given its (new) relevance, if you see it on your tv guide.
-
Just as sick is the petition by 100 famous hollywood people asking the courts to drop the case. Its not just Polanski I refered to in my above post, its the 100 hollywood elite that condoned his act by asking the case to be dropped.
-
Just as sick is the petition by 100 famous hollywood people asking the courts to drop the case. Its not just Polanski I refered to in my above post, its the 100 hollywood elite that condoned his act by asking the case to be dropped.
Wonder where those 100 were when Michael Jackson was being dragged thru the mud? I am in no way defending Jackson, as I think he was a sick person who was guilty, but it wasn't the "trendy" thing to do to defend Jackson. Excusing Polanksi is the in-thing to do in Hollywood.
-
wow... anyone who says he should be released should have to read the sick details of the incident aloud first.
-
i just don't know how any "normal" thinking person can excuse his behavior. what the hell am I missing here?
-
Guy's a genius, no doubt, but he butt-farked a 13 year-old! 13 years old, dude!
castrate him and let him move on with his life.
-
let him suffer the consequences.. IF it wasn't such a big deal why didn't he deal with it at the time. The authorities got it right this time.
i agree 100% with this!
-
oh boy...another celeb f##ks up and it's big news. dont see many stories about the nor amer and euro peds running wild in poor countries. use some resources on them
-
Supposedly this is his list of supporters so far:
(from www.indiewire.com)
Over 100 In Film Community Sign Polanski Petition
by Peter Knegt (September 29, 2009) Polanski petition signatories, as of September 29th:
Fatih Akin
Stephane Allagnon
Woody Allen
Pedro Almodovar
Wes Anderson
Jean-Jacques Annaud
Alexandre Arcady
Fanny Ardant
Asia Argento
Darren Aronofsky
Olivier Assayas
Alexander Astruc
Gabriel Auer
Luc Barnier
Christophe Barratier
Xavier Beauvois
Liria Begeja
Gilles Behat
Jean-Jacques Beineix
Marco Bellochio
Monica Bellucci
Djamel Bennecib
Giuseppe Bertolucci
Patrick Bouchitey
Paul Boujenah
Jacques Bral
Patrick Braoudé
Andre Buytaers
Christian Carion
Henning Carlsen
Jean-Michel Carre
Patrice Chereau
Elie Chouraqui
Souleymane Cisse
Alain Corneau
Jerome Cornuau
Miguel Courtois
Dominique Crevecoeur
Alfonso Cuaron
Luc et Jean-Pierre Dardenne
Jonathan Demme
Alexandre Desplat
Rosalinde et Michel Deville
Georges Dybman
Jacques Fansten
Joël Farges
Gianluca Farinelli
Jacques Fansten
Etienne Faure
Michel Ferry
Scott Foundas
Stephen Frears
Thierry Fremaux
Sam Gabarski
René Gainville
Tony Gatlif
Costa Gavras
Jean-Marc Ghanassia
Terry Gilliam
Christian Gion
Marc Guidoni
Buck Henry
David Heyman
Laurent Heynemann
Robert Hossein
Jean-Loup Hubert
Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu
Gilles Jacob
Just Jaeckin
Alain Jessua
Pierre Jolivet
Kent Jones
Roger Kahane,
Nelly Kaplan
Wong Kar Waï
Ladislas Kijno
Harmony Korine
Jan Kounen
Diane Kurys
Emir Kusturica
John Landis
Claude Lanzmann
André Larquié
Vinciane Lecocq
Patrice Leconte
Claude Lelouch
Gérard Lenne
David Lynch
Michael Mann
François Margolin
Jean-Pierre Marois
Tonie Marshall
Mario Martone
Nicolas Mauvernay
Radu Mihaileanu
Claude Miller
Mario Monicelli
Jeanne Moreau
Sandra Nicolier
Michel Ocelot
Alexander Payne
Richard Pena
Michele Placido
Philippe Radault
Jean-Paul Rappeneau
Raphael Rebibo
Yasmina Reza
Jacques Richard
Laurence Roulet
Walter Salles
Jean-Paul Salomé
Marc Sandberg
Jerry Schatzberg
Julian Schnabel
Barbet Schroeder
Ettore Scola
Martin Scorcese
Charlotte Silvera
Abderrahmane Sissako
Paolo Sorrentino
Guillaume Stirn
Tilda Swinton
Jean-Charles Tacchella
Radovan Tadic
Danis Tanovic
Bertrand Tavernier
Cécile Telerman
Alain Terzian
Pascal Thomas
Giuseppe Tornatore
Serge Toubiana
Nadine Trintignant
Tom Tykwer
Alexandre Tylski
Betrand Van Effenterre
Wim Wenders
-
guys we havent seen her picture yet.
-
guys we havent seen her picture yet.
I think this was her then:
(http://download.kataweb.it/mediaweb/image/brand_trovacinema/2008/08/14/1218725588177_13ok.jpg)
And her now:
(http://www.pollsb.com/photos/o/115622-samantha_gailey_says_leave_polanski_alone.jpg)
Gailey is also pro-Polanski now...she says leave him alone. :o
-
Gailey is also pro-Polanski now...she says leave him alone. :o
I wonder how much he has increased her bank account over the years to ensure that? Doesn't matter either way. He commited a heinous crime and deserves punishment just like every other shitbag.
-
I wonder how much he has increased her bank account over the years to ensure that? Doesn't matter either way. He commited a heinous crime and deserves punishment just like every other shitbag.
Don't know, but either way I think the guy should be in prison being someone else's bitch. >:(
-
Don't know, but either way I think the guy should be in prison being someone else's bitch. >:(
QFT
-
He had anal sex with a drugged underage kid,if some of you think thats ok,then you need some serious help.
BINGO.
again this site- and alot of americans...continue to amaze.
Here you have a guy who at the time WAS influential in his home country, WAS an adult, WAS able to know what is right and wrong, WAS aware of what influence he has and all that added up amounts to a situation where, whether "consentual" or not- a child has submitted to an adult act.
I am shocked that he also sodomised her...i wasnt aware of that detail.
We'd be after him with pitchforks if he wasnt a well known celeb and be calling for his nuts in a sling.
30 years ago?...oh ok, then lets leave those pesky holocaust animals to their retirements then, and lets also clear out the cold case archive so we can get the space for a new lunch room down at the station.
-
Arnold is just THE fucking man
At a time when these weak fucking celebrities demand that Roman Polanski a Child rapist should be let free - because hes just such an important person ::) (I focking hated the piano - arty fancy pancy fuck off)
Arnold said it like it is..
He said he shouldn't be treated any different then any other person who is/was charged with such a crime.
HOW THE FUCK!!!! can these hollywood no good rich spoiled fucking pukes be on the side of a Child rapist? If he would be a nobody they would want him hanged...I MAKES SO ANGRY I'M GOING TO SACRAFICE A NEWBORN PUPPY AND DRINK HIS BLOOD!!!!!
Hes a childrapist for fucks sake - whats wise about that move? Well for a starter he cannot do it again.hahah basicly she said it was suprise sex - it wasn't rape rape ::) what the fuck is that? So it was rape but it wasn't? Oh yeah shows you again if the person accused of a crime is too well known the crime becomes negotiable.
Like what? he ran from the law for far too long - how the fuck did he get away with it in the first place.. I applaud the Switz athority.
What a dumb fuckOh its alright folks - you can rape little children all you want - just don't kill'em that wouldn't be nice :( - and yeah you dumb fuck the victim has asked for the case to be dismissed because she probably finally managed to have a "normal" life and doesn't want to be dragged through the dirt - sounds plausible? not to Fonda ::)
I tell you what we all should do BOYCOT the fuck of anybody who makes a movie and defended that asshole - fuck these rich fucks.
(http://riverdaughter.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/rapist1.jpg?w=468&h=409)
fuck Polanski I hope he rots in that imaginary hell
-
Yes, they should ignore his wrong because that will help out..... how about just go after all the scum?
Pointless.
-
I'm a lib and I'd beat your pussy ass into the ground and not even say sorry
Brutal tough guy post.
-
You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.
The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here.
This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.
You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.
If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't!
-
I saw Debra Winger defending him and was wondering the same thing about her...what if it would have been her daughter? What if it would have even been her mother as an adult? It was RAPE....not consensual.
Apparently he admitted it and fled the country the next day.
I'd post what a 13 year old girl looks like but decided against it.
Here is a 13 year old boy. Looks like a little BOY. She was a 13 year old little girl.
Turns out that kid wasn't the dad.
-
You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.
The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here.
This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.
You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.
If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't!
Meltdown.
-
The incident was more than 30 years ago and the "victim", a drugged under-aged model who had sex with him willingly, has forgiven him in public already for decades. It was no rape, it's just that sex with minors in the US was (or still is?) declarated a rape automatically.
Why the drama?.... ::)
So the fact that the underage girl was drugged up makes this OK ?
So - if I go out & find a couple of glued-up 12 years olds in Bangkok slums and give them a length, that would be fine with you ?
The mind boggles.
If I found a drugged up teen, I'd be doing what I could to get her into rehab, not doing what I could to get into her pants.
-
The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason.
You don't think protecting his future victims is rational ???
-
I am a republican
And I would simply hire someone to break your legs
But what if you've spent all your money grooming helping young male relatives?
-
oh boy...another celeb f##ks up and it's big news. dont see many stories about the nor amer and euro peds running wild in poor countries. use some resources on them
interesting point ... it's a distraction.
what are the odds Switzerland finally decides to let authorities arrest him? Something fishy happening here.
-
not only was she 13, but he also drugged her up first! the guy is a piece of shit and I can't wait for him to go to a cali jail and this time he will be the one getting raped. let's see if whoopi goldberg calls that "rape-rape."
Jesus Christ what a witch hunt. You teen twats are ready to hang that poor idiot for something he has done over 20 years before you were born, without any knowledge what really has happen? Roman was in a party, he was drunk and high, and he met a hot young bitch in there and they have sex. The bitch wasn't any shy little virgin with pony tails and lollipop, she was some kind a party toy who fuck with anyone to get high and no one knows her real age at the moment, she was in every party in town. Roman was famous so the little bitch calculated that there will be some money for her if she go to police, but what a disappointment, Roman runs and didn't pay anything. She got nothing, her party times are over because everybody knows what a under age teen whore she is, and to save that little she has, she gives a interview where she told that she doesn't blame Polanski. Where is the crime?
Who can say he will do differently when at the party, sizzling hot young girl want to have sex with him. 99,98% of any man who have a some kind of dick, will fuck her and those 00.2% are eunuchs. In USA there is over a million teen pregnancies per year, so Romans mistake is quite common. Youngest of those are 10 years old, so it seem to me that many of you doesn't ask girls age before sex. Only thing which you can blame Polanski, is the fact that he was careless and stupid, but in those times it wasn't big deal. Every one fuck any one at the party, no aids, no paparazzi pushing his camera at your asshole every time you drop your pants. Everybody in hollywood uses drugs, a half of film industry is permanently high by every drug you can name of. Stars dies by OD's, there is has been Manson's massacre etc., so if star like Polanski slip his dick in the wrong pussy, will that really be so big deal?
-
Jesus Christ what a witch hunt. You teen twats are ready to hang that poor idiot for something he has done over 20 years before you were born, without any knowledge what really has happen? Roman was in a party, he was drunk and high, and he met a hot young bitch in there and they have sex. The bitch wasn't any shy little virgin with pony tails and lollipop, she was some kind a party toy who fuck with anyone to get high and no one knows her real age at the moment, she was in every party in town. Roman was famous so the little bitch calculated that there will be some money for her if she go to police, but what a disappointment, Roman runs and didn't pay anything. She got nothing, her party times are over because everybody knows what a under age teen whore she is, and to save that little she has, she gives a interview where she told that she doesn't blame Polanski. Where is the crime?
Who can say he will do differently when at the party, sizzling hot young girl want to have sex with him. 99,98% of any man who have a some kind of dick, will fuck her and those 00.2% are eunuchs. In USA there is over a million teen pregnancies per year, so Romans mistake is quite common. Youngest of those are 10 years old, so it seem to me that many of you doesn't ask girls age before sex. Only thing which you can blame Polanski, is the fact that he was careless and stupid, but in those times it wasn't big deal. Every one fuck any one at the party, no aids, no paparazzi pushing his camera at your asshole every time you drop your pants. Everybody in hollywood uses drugs, a half of film industry is permanently high by every drug you can name of. Stars dies by OD's, there is has been Manson's massacre etc., so if star like Polanski slip his dick in the wrong pussy, will that really be so big deal?
I read all that and still came to the same conclusion I would had I just looked at your post count.
In other words...you're an idiot. ::)
-
Jesus Christ what a witch hunt. You teen twats are ready to hang that poor idiot for something he has done over 20 years before you were born, without any knowledge what really has happen? Roman was in a party, he was drunk and high, and he met a hot young bitch in there and they have sex. The bitch wasn't any shy little virgin with pony tails and lollipop, she was some kind a party toy who fuck with anyone to get high and no one knows her real age at the moment, she was in every party in town. Roman was famous so the little bitch calculated that there will be some money for her if she go to police, but what a disappointment, Roman runs and didn't pay anything. She got nothing, her party times are over because everybody knows what a under age teen whore she is, and to save that little she has, she gives a interview where she told that she doesn't blame Polanski. Where is the crime?
Who can say he will do differently when at the party, sizzling hot young girl want to have sex with him. 99,98% of any man who have a some kind of dick, will fuck her and those 00.2% are eunuchs. In USA there is over a million teen pregnancies per year, so Romans mistake is quite common. Youngest of those are 10 years old, so it seem to me that many of you doesn't ask girls age before sex. Only thing which you can blame Polanski, is the fact that he was careless and stupid, but in those times it wasn't big deal. Every one fuck any one at the party, no aids, no paparazzi pushing his camera at your asshole every time you drop your pants. Everybody in hollywood uses drugs, a half of film industry is permanently high by every drug you can name of. Stars dies by OD's, there is has been Manson's massacre etc., so if star like Polanski slip his dick in the wrong pussy, will that really be so big deal?
Hi Roman('s Pole-lover-sky)
-
arnolds words are the truth.. this douche bag needs to be raped in prison.
-
It's amazing how many people are trying to justify what happened. The fact remains that it did happen regardless if it was 30 odd years ago. I hope when he gets to jail he gets repeatedly fucked in the ass against his will for the next 30 years.
-
You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.
The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here.
This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.
You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.
If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't!
Polanski knew what he did, so he's guilty. Apparently you're not a hypocrite yourself ::), so you would have forgiven him the minute after he raped your 13 year old slutty daughter.
-
I wonder how many of the tough guys in the thread would think the above scenario was ok if it was their 13 yr old daughter?
Right and if the genders were reversed and it was a 40 year old woman caught "raping" your 13 year old son, I bet you'd be calling him a stud for slaying a cougar ?
-
You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.
The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here.
This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.
You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.
If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't!
You guys are all fucking stupid. The SAME people saying Polanski should go to jail are people who, in other threads, cheer and applaud 13 year old boys who had sex with their teachers. What a fucking joke.
I never once said it was oaky for females to have sex with their make students . And the difference is it was consensual Roman drugged and raped this girl , massive difference
The is no reason Polanski should go to jail. No rational reason. If the victim can forgive him, what the fuck gives the govt. the right to imprison him? The govt. only has the right to imprison people if there is a threat that they can do harm to others, and there is obviously no threat here
No reason? there are plenty , he broke the law , ran from justice of and that pesky little problem of rape . The victim sued and won an undisclosed amount of money from Polanski and she once again doesn't want her name in the public spotlight . what gives the Government a right to imprison him? he broke that law. and if that were your daughter I think you would want him to be punished to the fullest extent of the law , myself I would want to bury the guy
This idea that the govt. should imprison people for some abstract reason because a crime was committed decades ago and there was once a victim at one time in the past, and the fact that this victim opposes putting him away is somehow irrelevant? It's totally illogical.
so rape has a statue of limitations? plus the fact he fled instead of facing the charges and dealing with the consequences , he's a fugitive in this country , I would have more respect for the guy if he admitted his crime paid his debt to society and moved on , he didn't and I'm glad he may be paying the price for it . the victim may have forgave him he law hasn't
You can jump up and down and beat your chests and pretend you're some champion for justice by arguing for prison for Polanski, but in the end you are nothing more than an ignorant hypocrite who cheers and applauds the same incidences that happen to 13 year old boys. Though, scientifically, 13 year old females are much more mature than 13 year old males.
Hello big difference between rape and consensual sex , it's wrong on all levels , these boys were manipulated by a much older woman even though they agreed , Polanski drugged and raped this girl , rape NON-CONSENSUAL , even if she agreed it's still wrong
If this had just happened recently and the victim had not forgiven him and were still a child, and there were a real threat to the public...things would be different...
But they aren't
Who cares if he behaved like an angel for the rest of his days? this forgives his debt to society? Roman Polanski is a child rapist and if it were my daughter I would move heaven & earth to make him pay . It's time to pay the piper Roman , I hope you go to jail until you die ;D
-
No reason? there are plenty , he broke the law , ran from justice of and that pesky little problem of rape . The victim sued and won an undisclosed amount of money from Polanski and she once again doesn't want her name in the public spotlight . what gives the Government a right to imprison him? he broke that law. and if that were your daughter I think you would want him to be punished to the fullest extent of the law , myself I would want to bury the guy
I don't see a reason here.
so rape has a statue of limitations? plus the fact he fled instead of facing the charges and dealing with the consequences , he's a fugitive in this country , I would have more respect for the guy if he admitted his crime paid his debt to society and moved on , he didn't and I'm glad he may be paying the price for it . the victim may have forgave him he law hasn't
There is no statue of limitations, but the victim is over it and has moved on. What gives YOU the right to think that he should go to jail when the victim herself is over it? Epic presumption.
Hello big difference between rape and consensual sex , it's wrong on all levels , these boys were manipulated by a much older woman even though they agreed , Polanski drugged and raped this girl , rape NON-CONSENSUAL , even if she agreed it's still wrong
Who cares if he behaved like an angel for the rest of his days? this forgives his debt to society? Roman Polanski is a child rapist and if it were my daughter I would move heaven & earth to make him pay . It's time to pay the piper Roman , I hope you go to jail until you die ;D
That's bad and terrible, but you are wanting to put him in jail for some abstract reason of Justice. Because that is all that is left after the victim her self, now an adult, has moved on and forgiven him and doesn't want him in jail. There is no "debt to society" apart from perhaps damage done to the girl (which I'm sure is now gone) or money the trial cost.
-
I don't see a reason here.
There is no statue of limitations, but the victim is over it and has moved on. What gives YOU the right to think that he should go to jail when the victim herself is over it? Epic presumption.
That's bad and terrible, but you are wanting to put him in jail for some abstract reason of Justice. Because that is all that is left after the victim her self, now an adult, has moved on and forgiven him and doesn't want him in jail. There is no "debt to society" apart from perhaps damage done to the girl (which I'm sure is now gone) or money the trial cost.
I don't see a reason here.
You're just being silly , he broke the law that's reason enough
There is no statue of limitations, but the victim is over it and has moved on. What gives YOU the right to think that he should go to jail when the victim herself is over it? Epic presumption.
no presumption needed , her forgiveness has nothing to do with the law , he's a fugitive from justice , he broke the law and he should pay his debt to society , because he's wealthy and makes great movies somehow means he's above the law? he should go to jail because she's a RAPIST that's why and he hasn't paid his debt to society
That's bad and terrible, but you are wanting to put him in jail for some abstract reason of Justice. Because that is all that is left after the victim her self, now an adult, has moved on and forgiven him and doesn't want him in jail. There is no "debt to society" apart from perhaps damage done to the girl (which I'm sure is now gone) or money the trial cost.
abstract reason of justice? you're either just being contrary or stupid , he drugged & raped a girl and then fled to avoid doing jail time , he paid her off too . If this were your daughter would you feel the same? there is no debt to society? nonsense he broke the law and should pay the price , you don't wanna go to jail DON'T rape 13 year old girls , simple math . He ran and never paid his debt to society even if he paid off his victim
-
There is no statue of limitations, but the victim is over it and has moved on. What gives YOU the right to think that he should go to jail when the victim herself is over it? Epic presumption.
LOL. Tell that to those who spent in concentration camps during WWII. Yo, Elie Wiesel? Pack up your tent, bro. liberalismo says your war is over. Time to get over it.
-
This Polanski girl is the same guy who was shagging Natasha Kinski when she was 14-15.
Pity Charlie Manson's tribe didn't hack Roman's weiner off that night in 1969 instead of mutilating his wife Sharon Tate.
-
LOL. Tell that to those who spent in concentration camps during WWII. Yo, Elie Wiesel? Pack up your tent, bro. liberalismo says your war is over. Time to get over it.
hahahahaha come on quit your bitching that was years ago
-
Yeah I would consider the Holocaust a bigger crime but I think most of the people involved are now dead.
-
This Polanski #### is the same guy who was shagging Natasha Kinski when she was 14-15.
Pity Charlie Manson's tribe didn't hack Roman's weiner off that night in 1969 instead of mutilating his wife Sharon Tate.
Exactly to bad his dumbass was in Europe
-
I think this was her then:
(http://download.kataweb.it/mediaweb/image/brand_trovacinema/2008/08/14/1218725588177_13ok.jpg)
cute tight ass
-
I see your arguement liberalismo, and I agree, we shouldn't put so many people in jail (particularly non-dealing drug offenders). Perhaps there is a better punishment but we must...must protect the youth in this country from adult preditors like Polanski. The purpose of the punishment is to define and deter this strict societal wrong. From the original story transcripts, Polanski used drugs/alcohol to force this girl to have sex. A typical 13yo basically just started menstrating and doesn't have the judgement of an adult.
For the poster above that was basically saying this girl was a party whore...dude, she was f'n 13yrs old. Barely out of childhood. If she was 18 or 19, I'd say you may be right...but at 13, it's the adult's responsibility not to abuse a child.
-
hahahahaha come on quit your bitching that was years ago
I know. I can't the remember how many times I've told survivors to get themselves a hip barbed wire tattoo to cover up their serial number. :-X
-
On Sky news now.
Film director Roman Polanski agreed to pay a 13-year-old girl he sexually assaulted $500,000, it has emerged.
Roman Polanski is being held in Switzerland
Polanski, who was detained in Switzerland this week, made the offer to Samantha Geimer in 1993, 15 years after he had sex with her.
Court records do not say whether the Oscar-winning director actually paid the full amount.
The terms of the settlement were confidential, but the amount was disclosed in court documents because of a two-year struggle to get Polanski to pay.
The court records were released in Los Angeles but the final one from August 1996 showed Polanski still owed £378,000.
Polanski was arrested last Saturday on a US warrant by authorities in Zurich, where he was set to receive a lifetime achievement award at the Zurich Film Festival.
The director had fled from the US in 1978 before being sentenced for having sex with the teenager.
He was accused of plying his young victim with alcohol and drugs during a modelling shoot.
The director initially faced charges including rape and molesting a child but pleaded guilty only to unlawful sexual intercourse.
Ms Geimer sued Polanski in December 1988 when she was 25 years old.
A host of actors and Hollywood stars have come forward in support of Polanski, urging US authorities to drop the warrant.
-
Look - if Woody Allen says it was above board, it's probably OK ;)
-
Wow, I never knew 30years was the time period in which shit didint matter anymore.
If Osama walked into New York on September 12th 2031 would all be well with you folks?
-
Wow, I never knew 30years was the time period in which shit didint matter anymore.
If Osama walked into New York on September 12th 2031 would all be well with you folks?
exactly ! no hard feelings it's been a long time ::)
-
Time does not negate a crime. Lots of tough guys in this thread ::)
-
Time does not negate a crime. Lots of tough guys in this thread ::)
I would just wonder how many would feel that way if it was their 13 year old daughter , I would be up for murder charges .
-
Those type of guys that defend him are they type of guys who...
a) are likely to do that shit/fantacise about that shit
b) have been walked over all their lives
-
Those type of guys that defend him are they type of guys who...
a) are likely to do that shit/fantacise about that shit
b) have been walked over all their lives
I for the life of me can't comprehend how anyone can try and defend his actions ??? ' she forgave him ' and?
-
You're just being silly , he broke the law that's reason enough
No it isn't. No rational person believes that simply breaking the law warrants persecution. If this were true, you'd support putting people in jail for selling pot. And if you did support that, you'd be a fool. There are always extenuating circumstances and other things to consider.
no presumption needed , her forgiveness has nothing to do with the law , he's a fugitive from justice , he broke the law and he should pay his debt to society , because he's wealthy and makes great movies somehow means he's above the law? he should go to jail because she's a RAPIST that's why and he hasn't paid his debt to society
You're not providing a real reason here. You're speaking in abstract untrue terms. He broke the law and thus, on that alone, should go to jail? No.
abstract reason of justice? you're either just being contrary or stupid , he drugged & raped a girl and then fled to avoid doing jail time , he paid her off too . If this were your daughter would you feel the same? there is no debt to society? nonsense he broke the law and should pay the price , you don't wanna go to jail DON'T rape 13 year old girls , simple math . He ran and never paid his debt to society even if he paid off his victim
She forgives him...I see nothing more to consider.
You say there IS a debt to society? What debt? Breaking the law, regardless of what it is or if it has been moved over, means a "debt"? How? This is irrational. What debt?
You're an idiot.
-
LOL. Tell that to those who spent in concentration camps during WWII. Yo, Elie Wiesel? Pack up your tent, bro. liberalismo says your war is over. Time to get over it.
Plenty of Jews have forgiven their Nazi persecutors.
-
I see your arguement liberalismo, and I agree, we shouldn't put so many people in jail (particularly non-dealing drug offenders). Perhaps there is a better punishment but we must...must protect the youth in this country from adult preditors like Polanski. The purpose of the punishment is to define and deter this strict societal wrong. From the original story transcripts, Polanski used drugs/alcohol to force this girl to have sex. A typical 13yo basically just started menstrating and doesn't have the judgement of an adult.
For the poster above that was basically saying this girl was a party whore...dude, she was f'n 13yrs old. Barely out of childhood. If she was 18 or 19, I'd say you may be right...but at 13, it's the adult's responsibility not to abuse a child.
This guy is no threat to society. He actually improves society with his work. Putting him away won't fix anything. It won't pay any non-existing debt. It won't do anything good, really.
No one here is arguing that what he did was not terrible. I agree. it was terrible. That's not the point though.
-
This guy is no threat to society. He actually improves society with his work. Putting him away won't fix anything. It won't pay any non-existing debt. It won't do anything good, really.
No one here is arguing that what he did was not terrible. I agree. it was terrible. That's not the point though.
Gary Glitter made good songs.
-
Wow, I never knew 30years was the time period in which shit didint matter anymore.
If Osama walked into New York on September 12th 2031 would all be well with you folks?
Time period has nothing to do with it. That isn't the issue.
-
I for the life of me can't comprehend how anyone can try and defend his actions ??? ' she forgave him ' and?
No one is defending his actions. At least, I'm definitely not. But you have no right to say he should go to jail. He did nothing to you, nor did he do anything to this abstract idea of "society". He hurt that girl and SHE forgave him and moved on and opposes his persecution. So that's it. It should be done with.
-
No it isn't. No rational person believes that simply breaking the law warrants persecution. If this were true, you'd support putting people in jail for selling pot. And if you did support that, you'd be a fool. There are always extenuating circumstances and other things to consider.
You're not providing a real reason here. You're speaking in abstract untrue terms. He broke the law and thus, on that alone, should go to jail? No.
She forgives him...I see nothing more to consider.
You say there IS a debt to society? What debt? Breaking the law, regardless of what it is or if it has been moved over, means a "debt"? How? This is irrational. What debt?
You're an idiot.
No it isn't. No rational person believes that simply breaking the law warrants persecution. If this were true, you'd support putting people in jail for selling pot. And if you did support that, you'd be a fool. There are always extenuating circumstances and other things to consider.
He admitted raping her , case closed. and there is a massive difference between selling pot and drugging & raping a 13 year old girl
You're not providing a real reason here. You're speaking in abstract untrue terms. He broke the law and thus, on that alone, should go to jail? No.
no real reason? yes you overlooked it ( something you're willing to do ) he admitted quilt and ran , he should be put in jail for both
She forgives him...I see nothing more to consider.
So if she didn't this would somehow change things? irrelevant if she forgives him , you can't or wont look past your own retarded logic
You say there IS a debt to society? What debt? Breaking the law, regardless of what it is or if it has been moved over, means a "debt"? How? This is irrational. What debt?
The debt for committing a wrong doing ( felony rape of a minor and a host of other felonies ) breaking multiple laws
You're an idiot.
coming from you that's ironic , either you're being contrary or you're being honest either way it makes you an asshole and please answer the question how would you feel if it were your 13 year old daughter?
-
She forgives him...I see nothing more to consider.
A guy rapes a child.. Just because the child forgives him doesn’t change the fact that he’s a child rapist.. You sick fuck.
-
No one is defending his actions. At least, I'm definitely not. But you have no right to say he should go to jail. He did nothing to you, nor did he do anything to this abstract idea of "society". He hurt that girl and SHE forgave him and moved on and opposes his persecution. So that's it. It should be done with.
I have no right? fair enough , the law has the right to tell him ;) he admitted to drugging & raping a 13 year old girl , he fled like the coward he is because he wanted to control how much time he was going to get .
The girl was also paid off by Polanski another tidbit you're willing to overlook , she may have forgave him that's irrelevant , I hope he spends the rest of his life in jail
-
This guy is no threat to society. He actually improves society with his work. Putting him away won't fix anything. It won't pay any non-existing debt. It won't do anything good, really.
No one here is arguing that what he did was not terrible. I agree. it was terrible. That's not the point though.
lmfao he improved society ::) he is a child rapist but he made good movies lmfao
the debt exists the debt of plea deal that he agreed to , stop typing there is no debt you're simply wrong.
-
He admitted raping her , case closed. and there is a massive difference between selling pot and drugging & raping a 13 year old girl
Indeed. But the point remains: OTHER things must be considered before you support or oppose someone being put in jail.
no real reason? yes you overlooked it ( something you're willing to do ) he admitted quilt and ran , he should be put in jail for both
Why?
So if she didn't this would somehow change things? irrelevant if she forgives him , you can't or wont look past your own retarded logic
It would change things. It changes everything.
The debt for committing a wrong doing ( felony rape of a minor and a host of other felonies ) breaking multiple laws
The ONLY damage he caused, he has tried to fix and the victim opposes his persecution. So beyond that, what debt is there? Clarify.
coming from you that's ironic , either you're being contrary or you're being honest either way it makes you an asshole and please answer the question how would you feel if it were your 13 year old daughter?
If it were my 13 year old daughter and happened now, I'd castrate him.
However, if she were an adult now and it happened a long time ago and my daughter has forgiven him and moved past it...I'd see no reason to persecute him.
-
However, if she were an adult now and it happened a long time ago and my daughter has forgiven him and moved past it...I'd see no reason to persecute him.
that is because you're a spineless piece of shit.
-
Indeed. But the point remains: OTHER things must be considered before you support or oppose someone being put in jail.
Why?
It would change things. It changes everything.
The ONLY damage he caused, he has tried to fix and the victim opposes his persecution. So beyond that, what debt is there? Clarify.
If it were my 13 year old daughter and happened now, I'd castrate him.
However, if she were an adult now and it happened a long time ago and my daughter has forgiven him and moved past it...I'd see no reason to persecute him.
Indeed. But the point remains: OTHER things must be considered before you support or oppose someone being put in jail.
No they don't , he agreed to a deal he reneged , he still owes everything else is semantics
Why?
you're just being contrary
It would change things. It changes everything.
it changes nothing in the eyes of the law
The ONLY damage he caused, he has tried to fix and the victim opposes his persecution. So beyond that, what debt is there? Clarify.
he didn't try and fix , he ran . he paid her off . the victim's wishes are irrelevant , has absolutely nothing to do with the law , the debt is the deal he agreed to
If it were my 13 year old daughter and happened now, I'd castrate him.
even if she forgave him? and wish for him to remain intact?
However, if she were an adult now and it happened a long time ago and my daughter has forgiven him and moved past it...I'd see no reason to persecute him.
easy to say when it hasn't happened to you personally , he made a deal with the law he reneged time to pay the piper
-
that is because you're a spineless piece of shit.
No. It would be because there would be no reason.
-
No. It would be because there would be no reason.
a man rapes your child up the ass… that’s not reason enough for you?
-
No. It would be because there would be no reason.
reason? plea deal which he didn't hold his end of the bargain that's the reason , he thought if he agreed to a plea he would serve just four years , the judged threatened more he ran instead of facing the music . If he held his part of the deal and served his time and got out and she forgave him and he made movies more power to him NOT what happened .
-
No they don't , he agreed to a deal he reneged , he still owes everything else is semantics
you're just being contrary
it changes nothing in the eyes of the law
he didn't try and fix , he ran . he paid her off . the victim's wishes are irrelevant , has absolutely nothing to do with the law , the debt is the deal he agreed to
even if she forgave him? and wish for him to remain intact?
easy to say when it hasn't happened to you personally , he made a deal with the law he reneged time to pay the piper
You aren't answering my questions. You are just restating your original claims.
-
You aren't answering my questions. You are just restating your original claims.
do you have a daughter?
-
You aren't answering my questions. You are just restating your original claims.
Everything you asked has been answered . and I'm just restating the original facts.
-
I have no right? fair enough , the law has the right to tell him ;) he admitted to drugging & raping a 13 year old girl , he fled like the coward he is because he wanted to control how much time he was going to get .
The girl was also paid off by Polanski another tidbit you're willing to overlook , she may have forgave him that's irrelevant , I hope he spends the rest of his life in jail
You already admitted that other circumstances must be taken into consideration before persecuting someone for a crime. So you can't go on and say "Well, it's illegal and that is that" because you admit that logic won't work.
-
Its pretty clear that *liberalismo* likes to anally violate young children.
sick fuck.
-
a man rapes your child up the ass… that’s not reason enough for you?
I'd support what my daughter wanted.
-
I'd support what my daughter wanted.
as long as the price is right....
you're pathetic.. spineless... a child rapist most likely.
why dont you run along and break a hip or something... you're old, right?
-
Ok...Obviously I won't get rational answers from the two of you.
-
Ok...Obviously I won't get rational answers from the two of you.
Well, lets see…
This guy gets young child alone.. for a *photo shoot*.. He then drugs her.. gets her boozed up.. and holds her against her will… as he rapes her.. sodomizes her.. and thrusts his dick wherever he wants. He stops raping her to answer the door.. The child scrambles to get her clothes on.. drugged and terrified.. He stops her, takes her clothes back off.. and rapes her up her young ass some more.
You don’t think this guy deserves any jail time.
You are a fucking low life. Get lost.
-
Well, lets see…
This guy gets young child alone.. for a *photo shoot*.. He then drugs her.. gets her boozed up.. and holds her against her will… as he rapes her.. sodomizes her.. and thrusts his dick wherever he wants. He stops raping her to answer the door.. The child scrambles to get her clothes on.. drugged and terrified.. He stops her, takes her clothes back off.. and rapes her up her young ass some more.
You don’t think this guy deserves any jail time.
You are a fucking low life. Get lost.
"Deserves" jail time? That doesn't even make sense. Since when did we put people in jail because they "deserved" it? There are plenty of people who belong in jail who deserve it but are free, and plenty of people who are in jail who do not deserve it. So "deserving" to go to jail isn't a justified reason to send someone to jail, because it is inconsistent.
I've already refuted the "debt to society" nonsense.
The only reasons to put him in jail are now gone. The victim doesn't want him in jail. The fact that you do is irrelevant to me. If the victim wanted him in Jail then I'd support it. She doesn't so I don't.
-
what did she wanted more. getting fucked by a great director in the ass. in the house of great actor Jack Niccolson! what girl wouldnt want that.
-
"Deserves" jail time? That doesn't even make sense. Since when did we put people in jail because they "deserved" it? There are plenty of people who belong in jail who deserve it but are free, and plenty of people who are in jail who do not deserve it. So "deserving" to go to jail isn't a justified reason to send someone to jail, because it is inconsistent.
I've already refuted the "debt to society" nonsense.
The only reasons to put him in jail are now gone. The victim doesn't want him in jail. The fact that you do is irrelevant to me. If the victim wanted him in Jail then I'd support it. She doesn't so I don't.
You didn't refute anything ....he made a plea deal he reneged , he owes the state jail time . case closed.
-
Plenty of Jews have forgiven their Nazi persecutors.
So!? What the fark does that have to do with Nazi war crimes? You're just trolling at this point.
-
what did she wanted more. getting fucked by a great director in the ass. in the house of great actor Jack Niccolson! what girl wouldnt want that.
Are you saying children are the orgasm of life, Mars?
-
what did she wanted more. getting fucked by a great director in the ass. in the house of great actor Jack Niccolson! what girl wouldnt want that.
Roman: 'Uh, Jack, can I use your house while you're on location?'
Jack: 'Sure, Roman. Knock yourself out.' *Thinks to himself: 'What's the worst that could happen?'*
-
So!? What the fark does that have to do with Nazi war crimes? You're just trolling at this point.
He is , and he's being contrary
-
So!? What the fark does that have to do with Nazi war crimes? You're just trolling at this point.
This is getbig, and you're calling someone a troll? ::)
-
He fled the country instead of doing jail time. Why reward someone for skipping town and avoiding the repercussions of their actions? Pretty cut and dry.
-
He fled the country instead of doing jail time. Why reward someone for skipping town and avoiding the repercussions of their actions? Pretty cut and dry.
Not on my dollar.
-
Not on my dollar.
Well it's a good thing that you're a gimmick troll and your dollar doesn't mean jack shit. Good to know that you side with kiddie fiddlers. Makes one wonder.
-
Well it's a good thing that you're a gimmick troll and your dollar doesn't mean jack shit. Good to know that you side with kiddie fiddlers. Makes one wonder.
he is a troll and he definitely like the kids... raping the kids.
I'd like to smack him around for a while.
-
I'd support what my daughter wanted.
thats where you got it all wrong...
he's probably sent a few $ her way in exchange for her dropping it.
Does this mean that people with no money go to jail and others with money dont?
thats why its still being pursued. it doesnt matter what the victim thinks or wants..thats out of context and irrelevant.
its what the law states..period.
and he needs to face up to the law..like we all do.
now, if his money allows him to defend the case then thats another story..and yet another advantage he has over people without money. But we all have heard of OJ havent we?
-
Some female wanted the hollywood cock, some coke and a great time.....then she cried foul when it went against her expecations
How about not putting yourself in the lions den in the first place....huh?.....sure, rape is rape, but.......ahhhhh, fuck it, they both suck.
But you know, Fonda is right -----> who gives a shit except Polanski, the girl (which she obviously doesnt) and family and friends (after 30 yrs? and the fact shes over it?).......100% lame
You've got G20 nazi-police violating the U.S. constituional rights of protestors in Philly, yet people care more about some debauch Polish homo who got caught doing what every director and producer has done since the dawn of time.
Lori Maddox is the real hero here.......
http://www.stryder.de/rest/Groupie_Central_Lori_%20Maddox.html