Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Lexus II on October 23, 2009, 06:13:39 PM

Title: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Lexus II on October 23, 2009, 06:13:39 PM
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3381/3546524246_d79c3e5894.jpg?v=0)

(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/frank_zane/frank_zane_034.jpg)

Anyone who thinks Peter Putnam is a better bodybuilder than Frank Zane needs to get their eyes checked.  These two aren't even in the same league.  To quote Lee Labrada "The bodies have gotten bigger, they have not gotten better."

No I am not Frank Zane.

Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: affy on October 23, 2009, 06:20:11 PM
which retard ever said otherwise?

Putnam himself can't be that blind
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: JaggyShortBuff on October 23, 2009, 06:21:29 PM
Noob. At least you are appealing to the jerkoff's of the iron era. Why chose Putnam to compare to Zane anyway, that makes no sense.
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: tendonitis on October 23, 2009, 06:23:13 PM
Putnam shouldn't even be a pro
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Emmortal on October 23, 2009, 06:29:16 PM
Putnam shouldn't even be a pro

The power of a blowjob.
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Lexus II on October 23, 2009, 06:30:22 PM
Noob. At least you are appealing to the jerkoff's of the iron era. Why chose Putnam to compare to Zane anyway, that makes no sense.

I saw an earlier post which compared the two and people actually thought Putnam was better.  They claimed that today Putnam would be judged better than Zane.  To me that just indicates how misguided the judging is today.  For example Branch beating Dexter.  Do I need to say more. :-\
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: jtsunami on October 23, 2009, 06:30:45 PM
Zane is a twink compared to the muscle men of today, he could never turn pro and would be laughed at the amatuer level haha fuckin twink
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: JaggyShortBuff on October 23, 2009, 06:37:27 PM
Zane is a twink compared to the muscle men of today, he could never turn pro and would be laughed at the amatuer level haha fuckin twink

Here we go again... Wonder when Sev will be here to have his rants about former pro's compared to pro's now.
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Lexus II on October 23, 2009, 06:41:36 PM
Zane is a twink compared to the muscle men of today, he could never turn pro and would be laughed at the amatuer level haha fuckin twink

Some people just can't recognize quality.  Is this more to your liking?

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6f/Markus_R%C3%BChl.jpg/250px-Markus_R%C3%BChl.jpg)
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: swilkins1984 on October 23, 2009, 06:50:41 PM
Some people just can't recognize quality.  Is this more to your liking?

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6f/Markus_R%C3%BChl.jpg/250px-Markus_R%C3%BChl.jpg)

Strange having great bis but weak tris. Usually its the opposite
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: jtsunami on October 23, 2009, 07:00:35 PM
Some people just can't recognize quality.  Is this more to your liking?

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6f/Markus_R%C3%BChl.jpg/250px-Markus_R%C3%BChl.jpg)

qaulity, yeah right, zane had genetics of a swimmer and couldn't even compete with the advanced competition of today.  How bout you show Dexter the little twink of today against twink Zane, the current twink on the Olympia scene outmasses twink ass zane be 3x.

jt
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: dyslexic on October 23, 2009, 07:33:13 PM
which retard ever said otherwise?

Putnam himself can't be that blind


R U sure?

(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/puts-eyes.gif)
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: clued-up on October 23, 2009, 07:39:46 PM
(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/frank_zane/frank_zane_034.jpg)

awesome build with great proportions and a small waist.   
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: alnassak on October 23, 2009, 11:24:26 PM
(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/frank_zane/frank_zane_034.jpg)

awesome build with great proportions and a small waist.   

X10  ;)
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: clued-up on October 23, 2009, 11:36:40 PM
X10  ;)

you could look like him.. you have his genetics.
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: dyslexic on October 23, 2009, 11:48:48 PM
Zane could post in the abs thread...
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: kiwiol on October 23, 2009, 11:57:18 PM

R U sure?

(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/puts-eyes.gif)

You are a dangerous man to cross in an online forum, lol
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Tombo on October 24, 2009, 12:08:34 AM
Peter Putnam looks great (no homo) but he is definitely not a top level bodybuilder
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: alnassak on October 24, 2009, 03:29:43 AM
you could look like him.. you have his genetics.

Oh Dear you are a very respectful person who always speak honestly, thanks a lot for your motivational words and I wish one day to look like Frank Zane.  :)
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Mr Nobody on October 24, 2009, 03:50:56 AM
Putnam shouldn't even be a pro
One of the best lat spreads of all time  ;D
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: bigdumbbell on October 24, 2009, 04:26:58 AM
putnam and zake kahn whoud do comparison shots 
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Mr Nobody on October 24, 2009, 04:28:27 AM
putnam and zake kahn whoud do comparison shots 
yes first callout in prejudging ;D
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Mars on October 24, 2009, 05:02:50 AM
its an insult to zane to compare him with lilliputnam
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: DK II on October 24, 2009, 05:18:22 AM
its an insult to zane to compare him with lilliputnam

x2.

Zane is the best.
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Lexus II on October 24, 2009, 06:18:00 AM
Zane is a twink compared to the muscle men of today, he could never turn pro and would be laughed at the amatuer level haha fuckin twink

If Putnam can turn pro than Zane surely could turn pro.  If Zane wanted to put on more muscle he could.  In fact he had much bigger legs earlier in his career, but decided they were overpowering his upper body. 

I once read a leg workout he had with Arnold where he out-squated
Arnold with 400 lbs.  So, the guy was strong and could have easily converted that strength to mass.  He was striving for a look.  Forget how much you weigh.  What do you look like in the mirror.

(http://www.enlightennext.org/magazine/j39/zane/goldsgym.jpg)
I wish my gym had people that look like this.  Talk about motivation.

(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/223/502555486_091e82adf8.jpg)

Twink? I think not.  Check out his wife below.
(http://www.gmv.com.au/images/catalog/70%20winners.jpg)
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Ex Coelis on October 24, 2009, 07:40:20 AM
Zane was a total dream-boat (no homo)
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Fatpanda on October 24, 2009, 08:27:33 AM
i wonder if arnold nailed zanes wife?

because lets face it - arnold gets what arnold wants  ;)
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: lax on October 24, 2009, 10:42:49 AM
reg park himself said that zane had the best physique in history
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Danimal77 on October 24, 2009, 04:03:52 PM
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3381/3546524246_d79c3e5894.jpg?v=0)

(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/frank_zane/frank_zane_034.jpg)

Anyone who thinks Peter Putnam is a better bodybuilder than Frank Zane needs to get their eyes checked.  These two aren't even in the same league.  To quote Lee Labrada "The bodies have gotten bigger, they have not gotten better."

No I am not Frank Zane.



What did Zane's biceps measure? Arnold was once quoted as saying that without the steroids, Zane was a natural 130-140 pound guy.
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: njflex on October 24, 2009, 04:30:15 PM
putnam has  good build,good arms.legs,zane had a great build for his era,changed the way a bber should present himself on stage and his conditioning is still a benchmark today for a contest bber.
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: wordy on October 24, 2009, 04:30:31 PM

R U sure?

(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/puts-eyes.gif)

Thats not Rydian off 2007 X Factor!
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: jtsunami on October 24, 2009, 04:37:04 PM
What did Zane's biceps measure? Arnold was once quoted as saying that without the steroids, Zane was a natural 130-140 pound guy.

lol zane was a twink natural or not.
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Ex Coelis on October 24, 2009, 04:38:08 PM
Putnam does not have a terrible physique, only a terrible back and hair style
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Bobby on October 24, 2009, 04:51:55 PM
What did Zane's biceps measure? Arnold was once quoted as saying that without the steroids, Zane was a natural 130-140 pound guy.

so arnold was a natural 200lb guy then ?
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: jtsunami on October 24, 2009, 06:20:51 PM
so arnold was a natural 200lb guy then ?

haha yeah right it's fuck in Arnold, he probably 215 or 220 natural.

Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 24, 2009, 06:40:20 PM
 ;D

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/joerelaxed1.jpg)

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/zane-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Zane VS Putnam
Post by: garebear on October 24, 2009, 06:50:07 PM
;D

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/joerelaxed1.jpg)

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/zane-1.jpg)
brothers?