Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The_Infidel on November 11, 2009, 06:01:35 PM

Title: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: The_Infidel on November 11, 2009, 06:01:35 PM
I'm really tired of hearing all the time that Arnold had toothpic legs.  It's baloney. Arnold had some of the best thighs in the business at that time and in my opinion he had the best calves ever.  His thighs were plenty big in 73 and 74.  The standard at that time was not to have have quads so big you can hardly walk.  

Most people who criticize Arnold's legs point to current bodybuilders as being "better".  It may be today's standard to have bodybuilders with gh guts, enormous legs and huge striated asses but that isn't what most would call better. That freakish bloated look is ridiculous and I think any rational person except for Getbig's permabulkers would agree.  This is one of the reasons that the sport has gone back to being an obscure freakshow instead the worthy pursuit that it was when Arnold popularized it in the 70s and 80's.  

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/742.jpg)
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Ursus on November 11, 2009, 06:05:24 PM
In some photos he had very deep seperation in his legs.

Thats a great pic.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Hulkotron on November 11, 2009, 06:07:21 PM
Best calves ever is debatable but I agree that his legs were not a weakpoint.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on November 11, 2009, 06:13:18 PM
Just an observation: Serge Nubre had weaker legs in my opinion, but nobody criticizes him at bb.com (I think this site is relevant because it's so popular) because Serge used to write on that forum among others. Now we know Arnold will never do that so he is open for critique (and people like to bring down the champ  ;D) This will alter the perception and opinion of masses greatly.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: wes on November 11, 2009, 06:18:04 PM
Great shot.

Just an FYI,but Waller,Coe, and Dickerson had much better calves that Arnold back in the day,though Arnold brought up his calves bigtime.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 11, 2009, 06:20:53 PM
I'm really tired of hearing all the time that Arnold had toothpic legs.  It's baloney. Arnold had some of the best thighs in the business at that time and in my opinion he had the best calves ever.  His thighs were plenty big in 73 and 74.  That was the standard at that time was not to have have quads so big you can hardly walk. 

Most people who criticize Arnold's legs point to current bodybuilders as being "better".  It may be today's standard to have bodybuilders with gh guts, enormous legs and huge striated asses but that isn't what most would call better. That freakish bloated look is ridiculous and I think any rational person except for Getbig's permabulkers would agree.  This is one of the reasons that the sport has gone back to being an obscure freakshow instead the worthy pursuit that it was when Arnold popularized it in the 70s and 80's. 

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/742.jpg)

Great post !
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Kwon on November 11, 2009, 06:43:44 PM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/742.jpg)

If you had that physique, would you sacrifice your gut to get even bigger legs? :)
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Hulkotron on November 11, 2009, 06:45:06 PM
Yes, I would walk around performing a most-muscular at all times such that my gut was hidden 8)
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Figo on November 12, 2009, 06:52:07 AM
Very balanced physique, fantastic upper body and good legs.

But bbing has evolved. It looked better then, but now, its about the preceding standard.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: hench on November 12, 2009, 12:42:33 PM
totally agree and there is a pic of arnold right next to dickerson at the 80 olympia and even in arnolds smaller version his calves dwarfed chris's
I'm really tired of hearing all the time that Arnold had toothpic legs.  It's baloney. Arnold had some of the best thighs in the business at that time and in my opinion he had the best calves ever.  His thighs were plenty big in 73 and 74.  The standard at that time was not to have have quads so big you can hardly walk.  

Most people who criticize Arnold's legs point to current bodybuilders as being "better".  It may be today's standard to have bodybuilders with gh guts, enormous legs and huge striated asses but that isn't what most would call better. That freakish bloated look is ridiculous and I think any rational person except for Getbig's permabulkers would agree.  This is one of the reasons that the sport has gone back to being an obscure freakshow instead the worthy pursuit that it was when Arnold popularized it in the 70s and 80's.  

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/742.jpg)
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: bigkubby on November 12, 2009, 12:53:48 PM
hIS BACK IS AS narrow as a flatSCREEN TV  :D
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: lovemonkey on November 12, 2009, 12:56:07 PM
Just an observation: Serge Nubre had weaker legs in my opinion, but nobody criticizes him at bb.com (I think this site is relevant because it's so popular) because Serge used to write on that forum among others. Now we know Arnold will never do that so he is open for critique (and people like to bring down the champ  ;D) This will alter the perception and opinion of masses greatly.

Is serge still alive btw?

4000th post  :D
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: disco_stu on November 12, 2009, 12:56:25 PM
I'm really tired of hearing all the time that Arnold had toothpic legs.  It's baloney. Arnold had some of the best thighs in the business at that time and in my opinion he had the best calves ever.  His thighs were plenty big in 73 and 74.  The standard at that time was not to have have quads so big you can hardly walk.  

Most people who criticize Arnold's legs point to current bodybuilders as being "better".  It may be today's standard to have bodybuilders with gh guts, enormous legs and huge striated asses but that isn't what most would call better. That freakish bloated look is ridiculous and I think any rational person except for Getbig's permabulkers would agree.  This is one of the reasons that the sport has gone back to being an obscure freakshow instead the worthy pursuit that it was when Arnold popularized it in the 70s and 80's.  

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/742.jpg)


great post. well said.
couldnt agree more.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: jaejonna on November 12, 2009, 12:59:33 PM
I'm really tired of hearing all the time that Arnold had toothpic legs.  It's baloney. Arnold had some of the best thighs in the business at that time and in my opinion he had the best calves ever.  His thighs were plenty big in 73 and 74.  The standard at that time was not to have have quads so big you can hardly walk.  

Most people who criticize Arnold's legs point to current bodybuilders as being "better".  It may be today's standard to have bodybuilders with gh guts, enormous legs and huge striated asses but that isn't what most would call better. That freakish bloated look is ridiculous and I think any rational person except for Getbig's permabulkers would agree.  This is one of the reasons that the sport has gone back to being an obscure freakshow instead the worthy pursuit that it was when Arnold popularized it in the 70s and 80's.  

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/742.jpg)
your like about three decades late .... but good post...
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: nukkaready on November 12, 2009, 02:03:18 PM
The Arnold of '73 & '74 was phenomenal. He is not getting enough credit for his '73 showing... sadly there are only very few pics of the Mr. Olympia 1973 floating around.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: lax on November 12, 2009, 02:18:11 PM
Great shot.

Just an FYI,but Waller,Coe, and Dickerson had much better calves that Arnold back in the day,though Arnold brought up his calves bigtime.


add mentzer to those who bested A in calves
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: The ChemistV2 on November 12, 2009, 02:25:52 PM
hIS BACK IS AS narrow as a flatSCREEN TV  :D
I've seen worse...
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: lax on November 12, 2009, 02:42:00 PM
I've seen worse...

as have I
such as in my bathroom mirror today
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: lovemonkey on November 12, 2009, 02:46:06 PM
as have I
such as in my bathroom mirror today

Did you need a 'hand' brushing your teeth?
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: bigbobs on November 12, 2009, 02:46:30 PM
Actually Arnold himself acknowledged that his thighs and calves were his weak points.  If you scross to about 1:05 in this video you'll haer it from Arnold:

Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: wes on November 12, 2009, 02:48:35 PM
How`d oilbag Nasser get in this thread?
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: bigbobs on November 12, 2009, 02:53:12 PM
How`d oilbag Nasser get in this thread?

This thread is about Arnold's legs and whether or not they were weak.  I posted a clip where Arnold himself speaks on the issue and acknowledges that his thighs and calves were his weak points.  That's pretty much the most on-topic post in this thread, yet you're making it into another Nasser post?  ::)
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: hench on November 12, 2009, 02:56:37 PM
were weak until he brought them up. He says this in pumping iron, he had weakpoints years ago but everything was evened out.
This thread is about Arnold's legs and whether or not they were weak.  I posted a clip where Arnold himself speaks on the issue and acknowledges that his thighs and calves were his weak points.  That's pretty much the most on-topic post in this thread, yet you're making it into another Nasser post?  ::)
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: hench on November 12, 2009, 03:06:02 PM
chris's calves look awesome on their own but small even next to under par Arnold.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: wes on November 12, 2009, 03:11:24 PM
Yes,but don`t forget Arnold was much much taller than Chris.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: wes on November 12, 2009, 03:12:13 PM
This thread is about Arnold's legs and whether or not they were weak.  I posted a clip where Arnold himself speaks on the issue and acknowledges that his thighs and calves were his weak points.  That's pretty much the most on-topic post in this thread, yet you're making it into another Nasser post?  ::)
C`mon Bob........just an excuse to post more Nasser bullshit!!
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Mr Nobody on November 12, 2009, 03:17:21 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: hench on November 12, 2009, 03:26:23 PM
yep and made up for it by having larger calves
Yes,but don`t forget Arnold was much much taller than Chris.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 12, 2009, 03:29:03 PM
C`mon Bob........just an excuse to post more Nasser bullshit!!

Obviously Tim....but why encourage him.

I'm done commenting on all things Team Nasser, just let their threads fall off the page.

They are obviously never going to stop regardless of the fact that 99% of the board thinks it's retarded, why give them the satisfaction and bump their threads?
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: wes on November 12, 2009, 03:53:54 PM
I hear you man..........just friggin` tired of the "The Wizard" !!  LOL  :)

I mean really,who actually cares about him these days besides the two tools on GetBig?
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: bigbobs on November 12, 2009, 03:56:16 PM
I hear you man..........just friggin` tired of the "The Wizard" !!  LOL  :)

I mean really,who actually cares about him these days besides the two tools on GetBig?

Actually a lot more people care about Nasser El Sonbaty than "wes" from getbig.  He gets tons of hits on his website, fan mail, people approach him daily in San Diego, etc.

Back to my original post, yes it happened to be a video of Nasser posting at the AC but was totally on topic since Arnold himself is speaking on the topic of this thread - his (relatively) weak legs.  The fact that all you gathered from that was Nasser shows he lives in your mind ;)
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: wes on November 12, 2009, 03:58:35 PM
Blah blah blah blah :)

Give it a rest bud.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: YoungBlood on November 12, 2009, 04:17:40 PM
Blah blah blah blah :)

Give it a rest bud.

Tim- I agree with you about the Nasser threads, they are way too much. Bobs knows that I hate all the shit he posts about "The Wizard," but also in this case, he is right.
As soon as I saw Nasser I thought 'Not this shit again?! This was a good thread too.' But then you hear Arnold speaking, analyzing Nasser, and the announcer asks Arnold about his weak points and what he felt they were- and Arnold answered.

Sad for me to admit this, but Bobs is correct this time. :-\
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 12, 2009, 07:02:04 PM
Actually a lot more people care about Nasser El Sonbaty than "wes" from getbig.  He gets tons of hits on his website, fan mail, people approach him daily in San Diego, etc.

Back to my original post, yes it happened to be a video of Nasser posting at the AC but was totally on topic since Arnold himself is speaking on the topic of this thread - his (relatively) weak legs.  The fact that all you gathered from that was Nasser shows he lives in your mind ;)

dont blame guys like gronk and wes for their jealousy my friend.. both of them are the same age as nasser and at this age the best they can do is to sit on GB all the day while nasser is..... well NASSER EL SONBATY!!..
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Coach is Back! on November 12, 2009, 08:21:39 PM
hIS BACK IS AS narrow as a flatSCREEN TV  :D

Step back and put the pipe DOWN!
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: The_Infidel on November 12, 2009, 08:30:10 PM
hIS BACK IS AS narrow as a flatSCREEN TV  :D

Nonsense

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/74Back.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/HugeBack.jpg)
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: The_Infidel on November 12, 2009, 09:05:14 PM
Actually Arnold himself acknowledged that his thighs and calves were his weak points.  If you scross to about 1:05 in this video you'll haer it from Arnold:

He said that they were GENETIC weak points.  There is a big difference.  He also said that he identified this early and trained them harder to bring them up to the level of his other body parts.  By 1971 they were far from "weak".  At no point are his comments in this video intended to "acknowledge" that he had weak legs as you would like us to believe.  His quads get a bum rap because people remember his 1980 comeback when he trained for only 2 months and came in less than his all-time best.......and won.  Ha!
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: disco_stu on November 12, 2009, 11:38:38 PM
He said that they were GENETIC weak points.  There is a big difference.  He also said that he identified this early and trained them harder to bring them up to the level of his other body parts.  By 1971 they were far from "weak".  At no point are his comments in this video intended to "acknowledge" that he had weak legs as you would like us to believe.  His quads get a bum rap because people remember his 1980 comeback when he trained for only 2 months and came in less than his all-time best.......and won.  Ha!

bang on..again!

arnold also famously stated that he had achieved the perfect physique, which meant that any change had to be accompanied by changes all over. At that point he had his legs just as he wanted them. any statement suggesting they were weak is arguing purely about the BB ideal for the time.

this is about perception, not arnold, although arnold was the benchmark.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Danimal77 on November 13, 2009, 07:36:19 AM
I'm really tired of hearing all the time that Arnold had toothpic legs.  It's baloney. Arnold had some of the best thighs in the business at that time and in my opinion he had the best calves ever.  His thighs were plenty big in 73 and 74.  The standard at that time was not to have have quads so big you can hardly walk.  

Most people who criticize Arnold's legs point to current bodybuilders as being "better".  It may be today's standard to have bodybuilders with gh guts, enormous legs and huge striated asses but that isn't what most would call better. That freakish bloated look is ridiculous and I think any rational person except for Getbig's permabulkers would agree.  This is one of the reasons that the sport has gone back to being an obscure freakshow instead the worthy pursuit that it was when Arnold popularized it in the 70s and 80's.  

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/742.jpg)

Very weal calves in that pic. Worse than Ronnie's.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Danimal77 on November 13, 2009, 07:38:09 AM
Great post !

Arnold or Dorian? Which one is the better bodybuilder in your opinion ND?
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Danimal77 on November 13, 2009, 07:41:23 AM
The Arnold of '73 & '74 was phenomenal. He is not getting enough credit for his '73 showing... sadly there are only very few pics of the Mr. Olympia 1973 floating around.

Arnold stopped progressing after 1974 (movies and a 5 year layoff from bodybuilding). He never hit his full potential.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Mars on November 13, 2009, 07:42:08 AM
i wish my legs were that weak, truly, only in this psycho business people wants to have and admire tumor stump legs like tom platz.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Danimal77 on November 13, 2009, 07:45:47 AM
Actually Arnold himself acknowledged that his thighs and calves were his weak points.  If you scross to about 1:05 in this video you'll haer it from Arnold:



I don't think Arnold appreciated being put on the spot like that, but I'm sure he respected that guy for being so courageous and asking him what his weak points were.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Danimal77 on November 13, 2009, 07:48:50 AM
Nonsense

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/74Back.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/HugeBack.jpg)

Biggest I've ever seen Arnold onstage. Looked to be hovering around the 250 pound mark there.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Mars on November 13, 2009, 07:59:49 AM
arnold had more veins on his back than jay butler on his whole body.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: crownshep on November 13, 2009, 10:06:36 AM
With regards the comment about Arnies back,in the 70s and 80s the relaxed round was exactly that.Relaxed.
Not this hold my arms as far away from my sides as possible to make it look like i can fly look.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Mars on November 13, 2009, 10:07:59 AM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/742.jpg)

theres truly someone standing, after that we havent seen much impressive stuff anymore.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: The ChemistV2 on November 13, 2009, 10:15:18 AM
With regards the comment about Arnies back,in the 70s and 80s the relaxed round was exactly that.Relaxed.
Not this hold my arms as far away from my sides as possible to make it look like i can fly look.
The way most of the guys stand now with the arms bent in an absurd manner looks extremely awkward.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on November 13, 2009, 10:16:20 AM
Arnold might be the only 6 foot or over guy who filled out before he was 50.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: YoungBlood on November 13, 2009, 10:25:10 AM
The way most of the guys stand now with the arms bent in an absurd manner looks extremely awkward.

Who has the gif file of Kamali with George Farah shoving the latter? It was quite obvious, and Kamali was standing exactly with the "I Believe I Can Fly" look.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: Mars on November 13, 2009, 11:24:20 AM
i wouldnt compare kamali with arnold.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: YoungBlood on November 13, 2009, 02:44:05 PM
i wouldnt compare kamali with arnold.

Excellent. Because neither was I.
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: hench on November 13, 2009, 03:04:36 PM
was going to say exactly the same thing. great post
He said that they were GENETIC weak points.  There is a big difference.  He also said that he identified this early and trained them harder to bring them up to the level of his other body parts.  By 1971 they were far from "weak".  At no point are his comments in this video intended to "acknowledge" that he had weak legs as you would like us to believe.  His quads get a bum rap because people remember his 1980 comeback when he trained for only 2 months and came in less than his all-time best.......and won.  Ha!
Title: Re: Arnold's weak legs
Post by: jaejonna on November 13, 2009, 03:05:38 PM
i wouldnt compare kamali with arnold.
 ;D