Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Marty Champions on November 19, 2009, 01:56:47 PM
-
heavy maximal sets and reps
or
alot of pushups 200 total
serious question
-
heavy weight 8-12 reps is where you reach failure
-
heavy weight 8-12 reps is where you reach failure
same after 100 pushups , youll be hittin failure after every 5 reps during and excruciating burn/pump
the more you do the better your chest tightens up, the key is insane volume hitting complete muscular failure atleast 40 times or you could say 40 sets to failure regardless of rep range 5-20 reps a set on pushups
-
same after 100 pushups , youll be hittin failure after every 5 reps during and excruciating burn/pump
the more you do the better your chest tightens up, the key is insane volume hitting complete muscular failure atleast 40 times or you could say 40 sets to failure regardless of rep range 5-20 reps a set on pushups
yeah you can but total weight is important too, not just failure.
-
yeah you can but total weight is important too, not just failure.
better yet density of training
you can have a fairly dense continuous workout over an hour long with many many sets, actual heavy weight becomes a non factor when total workload poundage over sets excedes that
you can do fewer sets at higher weight and have a higher average of weight but that is inferior to total volume of poundage
-
actual heavy weight becomes a non factor when total workload poundage over sets excedes that
no, both total poundage over the entire workout, and also the total poundage put on the muscle at one time matter. you need a mix of both
-
better yet density of training
you can have a fairly dense continuous workout over an hour long with many many sets, actual heavy weight becomes a non factor when total workload poundage over sets excedes that
you can do fewer sets at higher weight and have a higher average of weight but that is inferior to total volume of poundage
I would have to agree with this concept, but add that the work has to be at a very high intensity.
-
heavy weight 8-12 reps is where you reach failure
Agreed, 6-10 even better. Reg Park a massive classic dude before alot of roids came on the seen did 5 rep heavy benches for chest.
-
YOU HAVE TO DO LEGS
-
My chest looks best when a hot lady smashes her tig ole bitties into it.
-
try pre-exhaustion jf, heavy flyes straight into heavy inclines.
-
Then why don't marathon runners have huge legs?
-
Then why don't marathon runners have huge legs?
exactly
-
Then why don't marathon runners have huge legs?
intensity will always trump volume.
-
intensity will always trump volume.
I agree with this completely. What falcon is asking though is that if, with push ups, his intensity is high enough, will it be enough? I think he would definitely need weight training to do this, but heavy weight is not the end all be all to increasing muscle size.
-
I work with Ironman/Marathon competitors and they're all 160lbs soaking wet with no strength or muscle mass whatsoever, but they do have tremendous endurance. They train their asses off and believe me what they do is harder than lifting weights and bb. Anyone that says, "BB is the hardest sport on earth!" is absolutely full of dogshit.
-
I work with Ironman/Marathon competitors and they're all 160lbs soaking wet with no strength or muscle mass whatsoever, but they do have tremendous endurance. They train their asses off and believe me what they do is harder than lifting weights and bb. Anyone that says, "BB is the hardest sport on earth!" is absolutely full of dogshit.
Agreed 100% it's probably one of the easiest sports out there.
-
I agree with this completely. What falcon is asking though is that if, with push ups, his intensity is high enough, will it be enough? I think he would definitely need weight training to do this, but heavy weight is not the end all be all to increasing muscle size.
A muscle can work extremely hard with what most "lifters" would call a relatively "moderate" weight if performed in pre-exhaust fashion. As long as the three levels of strength are taxed beyond previous levels, growth will be triggered.
-
A muscle can work extremely hard with what most "lifters" would call a relatively "moderate" weight if performed in pre-exhaust fashion. As long as the three levels of strength are taxed beyond previous levels, growth will be triggered.
Exactly!
-
I work with Ironman/Marathon competitors and they're all 160lbs soaking wet with no strength or muscle mass whatsoever, but they do have tremendous endurance. They train their asses off and believe me what they do is harder than lifting weights and bb. Anyone that says, "BB is the hardest sport on earth!" is absolutely full of dogshit.
They also have the lowest test levels of any athlete. plus a skinny fat look. That and the top marathon runners are about 115-125 pounds. Man wasn't meant to run marathons, just as man wasn't meant to be 5'8 250 pounds. Both are extremes that are not natural
-
The problem you may be coming across Johnny is the one of only having a full looking chest after high volume type work. The muscle might even look fuller for a couple of days after and thus adding to the idea that the volume is triggering growth, but from personal experience it's normally just the encouragement for glycogen storage from this kind of training. If you tried pre-exhaust I can more than guarantee that you will slap on some more muscle as oppose to a temporary pump.
-
Running is not an extreme....hundreds of thousands of people are avid runners and do half/full marathons every year. Running is an extreme to someone who bbs and can't run the length of a city block without oxygen and difibrilator.
-
Running is not an extreme....hundreds of thousands of people are avid runners and do half/full marathons every year. Running is an extreme to someone who bbs and can't run the length of a city block without oxygen and difibrilator.
yes. Running is quite easy to pick up aswell, you just need to make sure you keep trying to increase your anaerobic threshold.
-
I work with Ironman/Marathon competitors and they're all 160lbs soaking wet with no strength or muscle mass whatsoever, but they do have tremendous endurance. They train their asses off and believe me what they do is harder than lifting weights and bb. Anyone that says, "BB is the hardest sport on earth!" is absolutely full of dogshit.
Bodybuilding is not the hardest but the unhealthiest sport on earth. Maybe that's what people mean by "hard"? (hard on your health)
-
you stop using your anaerobic energy systems after about 60 seconds of resistance... after that you start using lactic and then aerobic, why would you want to train those?
-
Running is not an extreme....hundreds of thousands of people are avid runners and do half/full marathons every year. Running is an extreme to someone who bbs and can't run the length of a city block without oxygen and difibrilator.
No, of course running is not extreme, it is natural. What IS extreme is running in marathons. That's why the human body looks the way it does. That's why women look the way they do, those who run marathons. There is no reason to run that far, just as there is no reason to look like a bodybuilder. They serve no NATURAL purpose. The man and female bodies start ro resemble each other. The women have low estrogen levels and the men have the lowest test levels of any athlete. That is nothing to brag about.
In the animal world, the fastest land mammal is the cheetah, but it made the trade off for having maximum speed, no endurance and no size, strength or muscle mass. The middle ground in terms of big cats, is the leopard--size, strength, agility and speed.
Now onto humans, humans have adapted to many diff environs, those among the east Africans have light builds and run a lot, good for long distances.
-
On track athletes who are the largest sprinters or marathon runners?
-
On track athletes who are the largest sprinters or marathon runners?
Sprinters of course. It's a natch.
Even in the dog world. Greyhounds have fuller muscles, for speed.Yet the Saluki and the Galgo have flatter muscles, because they are made for endurance, even though, they all have the same body type.
-
My chest is pathetic. i dont care much about it anymore. I am shoulder and tricep dominant