Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Hugo Chavez on December 15, 2009, 08:53:33 PM

Title: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 15, 2009, 08:53:33 PM
lol

Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: tonymctones on December 15, 2009, 09:19:55 PM
LOL to deny that the majority of mainstream media is left leaning or that the majority of mainstream media was left leaning during the election means youre an idiot

its as simple as that really...
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 15, 2009, 09:54:32 PM
I think there's more "far right" with a major media outlet than there is people who you could call "far left"  If you're talking about people in the media with a left leaning or right leaning bias, I'll grant there are more that lean left.  But you guys got the lockdown on far right voices over far left.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: tonymctones on December 15, 2009, 10:10:49 PM
I think there's more "far right" with a major media outlet than there is people who you could call "far left"  If you're talking about people in the media with a left leaning or right leaning bias, I'll grant there are more that lean left.  But you guys got the lockdown on far right voices over far left.
iono ill give you there are more publicly known far right than far left but there are plenty of far left voices out there.

and i wasnt talking about the ppl I was talking about the reporting or news topics, there is definitely a left leaning bias that show in these.

Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: OzmO on December 15, 2009, 10:52:14 PM
LOL to deny that the majority of mainstream media is left leaning or that the majority of mainstream media was left leaning during the election means youre an idiot

its as simple as that really...

No it isn't. The media is neither.  The media is business first.  Everything else is fluff and trivia.  Obama was BIG business for the media. 
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 15, 2009, 11:22:54 PM
iono ill give you there are more publicly known far right than far left but there are plenty of far left voices out there.

and i wasnt talking about the ppl I was talking about the reporting or news topics, there is definitely a left leaning bias that show in these.


I wasn't talking about people either.  I was only talking about those with a regular plateform to speak to the masses over issues and news.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 15, 2009, 11:27:43 PM
No it isn't. The media is neither.  The media is business first.  Everything else is fluff and trivia.  Obama was BIG business for the media. 
true, which means in areas on anything concerning big business, they're going to lean right.  I'd say the left is much more critical of big business than the right.  Bias in this area in the media does goes lean right.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Purge_WTF on December 15, 2009, 11:47:24 PM
  I like the way he mocks Laura "Hymen" Ingraham. Weren't they actually dating once? Heaven help him.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: 24KT on December 16, 2009, 12:48:21 AM
that's hilarious!  :D
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: 240 is Back on December 16, 2009, 04:05:18 AM
dems own congress and white house because repubs whine too fvcking much.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 16, 2009, 05:18:39 AM
dems own congress and white house because repubs whine too fvcking much.
Serious?
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: tonymctones on December 16, 2009, 10:30:53 AM
No it isn't. The media is neither.  The media is business first.  Everything else is fluff and trivia.  Obama was BIG business for the media. 
LOL I agree to an extent but you really think msnbc, abc, cnn are going to go right after obamas fiasco of a presidency?  ::) please dont blow smoke up my ass
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: tonymctones on December 16, 2009, 10:32:57 AM
dems own congress and white house because repubs whine too fvcking much.
::) what will you say when the dems lose congress next year? was it b/c they whined to much?

your idiocy is boundless  :-\
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: 240 is Back on December 16, 2009, 11:02:21 AM
yes, because in 2008 the R's had no balls.

Mccain should have stood up and announced Bush did a shitty job.  period.

he would have won 40 states.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: BM OUT on December 16, 2009, 11:15:28 AM
As usual Keith Olbermann,that no talent,no ratings getting socialist hack, looks foolish as he normally does.Olbermann is FAAAAAR left,Mathews is FAAAAR left,Maddow is FAAAAR left,Couric is FAAAAAR left,ABC,NBC and CBS news is FAAAAR left,CNN is FAAAR left,every single rock and roll and hip hop station in this country is FAAAAR left,Comedy central is FAAAR left.the NY TIMES is FAAAAR left,the LA TIMES is FAAAAR left,the Boston papers are FAAAAR LEFT.The very things that the left calls mainstream is FAAAAR left.

So,conservatives have talk radio and FOX and the WALL STREET JOurnal editoral page and EVERYTHING else is FAAAAR left.The problem is the FAAAR left claims people like Olbermann and the rest really are centrists not faaaar left.They will claim CBS and NBC and ABC is very centrist when REAL Americans know they are extreme leftists who support every left wing politician and position there is.

Here is the difference between the left and the right.Hannity and Rush and the rest proclaim "WE ARE CONSERVATIVES"!!!Olbermann and  his ilk claim "We are centrist".In fact they almost NEVER EVER use the term liberal they say "we are progressives".Its a joke!!!

Olbermann might want to worry as to how to get ratings and worry even more that his football show is THE WORST on television thanks to his lack of insight,lack of wit and lack of humor.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 16, 2009, 11:17:22 AM
yes, because in 2008 the R's had no balls.

Mccain should have stood up and announced Bush did a shitty job.  period.

he would have won 40 states.

McLaim was finished when he supported TARP an suspended his campaign. 

Were it not for Palin, he would have gotten 39%

240 - im not kidding - Palin is the only thing that kept him from a below 40% showing.   
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 16, 2009, 11:20:52 AM
::) what will you say when the dems lose congress next year? was it b/c they whined to much?

your idiocy is boundless  :-\
I'll say it's because they planned it that way, and not the dems lol..
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: BM OUT on December 16, 2009, 11:22:02 AM
McLaim was finished when he supported TARP an suspended his campaign. 

Were it not for Palin, he would have gotten 39%

240 - im not kidding - Palin is the only thing that kept him from a below 40% showing.   

100% correct!!!!
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 16, 2009, 11:25:05 AM
100% correct!!!!

The day Palin was picked - I picked up a new AR15 and signed up to volunteer.  Same with my parents, although they did not buy firearams that day.  ;D   

I went to PA for a week to do voter fraud operations if for no other reason than to say I made my effort to stop the Obamanation. 
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 16, 2009, 11:49:59 AM
OMG Bullshit revisionist excuses... lol...
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 16, 2009, 11:52:47 AM
OMG Bullshit revisionist excuses... lol...

Its not excuses.  McCain sucked and no one liked him.  65% of mccain voters or more were a anti-obama vote not a pro-mccain vote. 

It wasnt the media - it was mclame, bush, etc. 
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: kcballer on December 16, 2009, 12:21:08 PM
hahaha awesome vid. 
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: BM OUT on December 16, 2009, 12:28:59 PM
OMG Bullshit revisionist excuses... lol...

There is nothing revisionist about it.EVERY republican knew that from day one.Its only little simple minded morons like Olbermann and Dyke Maddow who think it was Palins fault.Obviously they have such a huge following because of such insight.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 16, 2009, 12:37:08 PM
There is nothing revisionist about it.EVERY republican knew that from day one.Its only little simple minded morons like Olbermann and Dyke Maddow who think it was Palins fault.Obviously they have such a huge following because of such insight.

Im serious - Palin and anti-obama were the only three reason myself and folks voted for MCain. 

 
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: BM OUT on December 16, 2009, 01:08:04 PM
Im serious - Palin and anti-obama were the only three reason myself and folks voted for MCain. 

 

Well,in my case it was Palin and anti-Joe"the dumbest man in the senate" Biden.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: 240 is Back on December 16, 2009, 01:21:53 PM
"240 - im not kidding - Palin is the only thing that kept him from a below 40% showing.    "

So in order for this to be true, he would have to have polled below 40% from march until the day he chose Palin, right?  ;) ;)
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: chadstallion on December 16, 2009, 01:28:45 PM
The day Palin was picked - I picked up a new AR15 and signed up to volunteer.  Same with my parents, although they did not buy firearams that day.  ;D   

I went to PA for a week to do voter fraud operations if for no other reason than to say I made my effort to stop the Obamanation. 
and we see how well that idea worked!
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 16, 2009, 01:30:20 PM
and we see how well that idea worked!

Not too well, but the McLame campaign was horrible.  I have worked in other campaigns and this was a horrible mess ligitics wise. 

I still have my AR15 though.   ;D
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: chadstallion on December 16, 2009, 01:35:06 PM
Not too well, but the McLame campaign was horrible.  I have worked in other campaigns and this was a horrible mess ligitics wise. 

I still have my AR15 though.   ;D
then you did better than mccain.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: Soul Crusher on December 16, 2009, 01:40:54 PM
then you did better than mccain.

ha ha.  time for him to retire already. 
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: OzmO on December 17, 2009, 02:55:06 PM
LOL I agree to an extent but you really think msnbc, abc, cnn are going to go right after obamas fiasco of a presidency?  ::) please dont blow smoke up my ass

Only when it becomes news they can sell.  Right now, its mostly chicken littles.  What Obama has done hasn't grown into its full effect yet, good or bad.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: tonymctones on December 17, 2009, 03:06:14 PM
Only when it becomes news they can sell.  Right now, its mostly chicken littles.  What Obama has done hasn't grown into its full effect yet, good or bad.
LOL your kidding yourselft OZ you think FOX is going to move left?

The majority of the media are progressive liberals and it shows in their reporting they will not move off this perch.
Title: Re: No Conservative Media Coverage?
Post by: OzmO on December 17, 2009, 03:27:44 PM
LOL your kidding yourselft OZ you think FOX is going to move left?

The majority of the media are progressive liberals and it shows in their reporting they will not move off this perch.

I agree that there are many progressive liberals in the media, who will when they can taint their reporting.  However, the bottom line is the news you see is the news that sells.  No matter how "liberal" American gets fox will always have "their" audience.  So, of course i don't see FOX turning into MSNBC.  But if there wasn't a "fox" audience, they'd pander up to the nearest thing they can sell to, even if it's commy pink-o liberal.