Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: quadzilla456 on December 27, 2009, 05:40:09 PM
-
-
Hologram????
Explosive definitely planted long before 9/11. Controlled demolition without question
-
Plane.
All those vids have been debunked at one time or another.
-
Plane.
All those vids have been debunked at one time or another.
something fishy happened though...
the 3rd building feel without any help from a plane :-\
-
the no-plane thing is generally considered false by most people who doubt the official story.
however, that very odd attachment on the bottom of the 2nd plane is interesting. Of course, all of you people who claim you've read every CT about 911 and found them all to be false - you already know about this object, right? ;)
-
the no-plane thing is generally considered false by most people who doubt the official story.
however, that very odd attachment on the bottom of the 2nd plane is interesting. Of course, all of you people who claim you've read every CT about 911 and found them all to be false - you already know about this object, right? ;)
Certainly not. There are bound to be more silly CT notions that haven't been addressed.
-
bottom of 2nd plane, anyone?
lmao... talking shit about something you haven't even read about.
-
in your freaking delusional mind. The hologram theory didn't need debunked as most everyone didn't buy it from the start so I'm sure you're talking about all the videos on 9/11 being debunked ::)
Never understood how this "hologram" stuff became mainstream and was actually entertained. But thats another topic.
-
yea, the pod. don't bug ozmo over it. He'll just copy paste the first excuse he can find and call it debunked.
::)
-
::)
Guys, until you can tell me what happened to Barbara Olsen and that you believe her husband, the former Solicitor General of the US, is on this to, this is nonsense.
-
333386 -> The pod.
You said you've researched all the 911 CTs, and this is one of the biggest. Your thoughts?
-
333386 -> The pod.
You said you've researched all the 911 CTs, and this is one of the biggest. Your thoughts?
My thoughts are that you get so wrapped up in these grand conspiracies but cant answer a basic question for me since the answer collapses your entire balloon.
240 - where is Barbara Olsen and is the ex-solicitor General of the US in on this cT?
yes or no?
-
33, there are thousands of Qs about that day.
You're saying we should ignore a 25-foot attachment to the bottom of a commercial jet because other people have Qs about something else that day?
No, they are not involved. I'm talking about something attached to a plane, and you change the subject. Ya know what, I'm not having this discussion with you until YOU EXPLAIN TO ME the pod theory - what was on the plane, how it got onto a commercial plane, and how those 19 guys on board did it ;)
-
33, there are thousands of Qs about that day.
You're saying we should ignore a 25-foot attachment to the bottom of a commercial jet because other people have Qs about something else that day?
No, they are not involved. I'm talking about something attached to a plane, and you change the subject. Ya know what, I'm not having this discussion with you until YOU EXPLAIN TO ME the pod theory - what was on the plane, how it got onto a commercial plane, and how those 19 guys on board did it ;)
So now the ground crew and the pilots were in on this?
BTW - its your obligation, not mine to explain the CT since you believe it and I dont.
After what happened in Xmas day, is it so hard to fathom that 4 planes could be hijacked without it being a grand conspiracy.
You 911 CT'ers mistake evil genius for incompetence.
I'm willing to look at info, but questions is not evidence.
-
No, I never said anyone on any crew was in on this.
Hell, if there was a giant pod on the plane, as all the video shows, and as you know, only one kind of plane has that podmount, and it ain't commercial...
My point is that many people claim to have read all the 911 CTs. But they haven't. They dont' know what PNAC is, they dont know about the pod. They don't konw that a small clean hole was burned thru the 3 outer rings of the pentagon, after the plane vaporized on the outside ring. They pump their fists and claim they've read it all,,, but they haven't.
So that's all. You do awesome work exposing the obama spending, and I read all your posts. But please please please don't claim to have read all the 911 CTs, if these basic ones elude you. You love the alex jones clips - the dude spent 6 years doing nothing but talking 911 Truth.
-
No, I never said anyone on any crew was in on this.
Hell, if there was a giant pod on the plane, as all the video shows, and as you know, only one kind of plane has that podmount, and it ain't commercial...
My point is that many people claim to have read all the 911 CTs. But they haven't. They dont' know what PNAC is, they dont know about the pod. They don't konw that a small clean hole was burned thru the 3 outer rings of the pentagon, after the plane vaporized on the outside ring. They pump their fists and claim they've read it all,,, but they haven't.
So that's all. You do awesome work exposing the obama spending, and I read all your posts. But please please please don't claim to have read all the 911 CTs, if these basic ones elude you. You love the alex jones clips - the dude spent 6 years doing nothing but talking 911 Truth.
240 - all I ask for is one CT that does not fall apart instantly when one asks even the most basic questions like, where is Barbara Olsen and is her husband in on it.
-
there is no olsen 911 ct. that is nonsense. do you want to keep harping on that? Or would you like to return to the original topic here?
it would be like if you said "Obama is turning america into a socialist state" and I said "There are lots of CTs about obama... if you cannot prove the birther issue, then your socialist state CT is also false".
-
there is no olsen 911 ct. that is nonsense. do you want to keep harping on that? Or would you like to return to the original topic here?
it would be like if you said "Obama is turning america into a socialist state" and I said "There are lots of CTs about obama... if you cannot prove the birther issue, then your socialist state CT is also false".
WRONG 240!!!!
If you cant account for Barba Olsen, the entire house of cards collapses and you know it.
-
the no-plane thing is generally considered false by most people who doubt the official story.
however, that very odd attachment on the bottom of the 2nd plane is interesting. Of course, all of you people who claim you've read every CT about 911 and found them all to be false - you already know about this object, right? ;)
Bump
-
33, there are thousands of Qs about that day.
You're saying we should ignore a 25-foot attachment to the bottom of a commercial jet because other people have Qs about something else that day?
No, they are not involved. I'm talking about something attached to a plane, and you change the subject. Ya know what, I'm not having this discussion with you until YOU EXPLAIN TO ME the pod theory - what was on the plane, how it got onto a commercial plane, and how those 19 guys on board did it ;)
Care to explain this 25 foot attachment?
-
Care to explain this 25 foot attachment?
Is this the first you've heard of it, 33?
If so - I'm embarassed for you. You claim to "know" all the CTs are bullshit before you hear them.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x134998
-
Is this the first you've heard of it, 33?
If so - I'm embarassed for you. You claim to "know" all the CTs are bullshit before you hear them.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x134998
So what do you think was in the magic attachment? Were the ground crew at the airport in on this? Thwey just let a plane take off with a mysterious 25 ft attachment?
So now the ground crew at the airport were in on this?
-
So what do you think was in the magic attachment? Were the ground crew at the airport in on this? Thwey just let a plane take off with a mysterious 25 ft attachment?
So now the ground crew at the airport were in on this?
I dont know and I don't care what was in this attachment.
The point is, it's not your standard airliner. They don't have that attachment.
So you can run with any assumptions you want. I just provided video and photographic evidence that the plane hitting the towers contained something on the bottom that isn't there usually. You can determine anything you want from that.
next, you'll pretend you didn't know about the flash of light this object delivers a split second before impact, right?
Some believe that 'whatever' was attached initiated this flash/explosion immediately before impact. believe whatever you want. Watch that 10-second clip. What do you see? An object that shouldn't be on the plane, delivering a flash before impact.
-
I dont know and I don't care what was in this attachment.
The point is, it's not your standard airliner. They don't have that attachment.
So you can run with any assumptions you want. I just provided video and photographic evidence that the plane hitting the towers contained something on the bottom that isn't there usually. You can determine anything you want from that.
next, you'll pretend you didn't know about the flash of light this object delivers a split second before impact, right?
Some believe that 'whatever' was attached initiated this flash/explosion immediately before impact. believe whatever you want. Watch that 10-second clip. What do you see? An object that shouldn't be on the plane, delivering a flash before impact.
Here is the problem 240 - and i am saying this am someone who likes you - all of these CT's don't happen in a vacuum. you have to make many assumptions to believe these theories, where 99% of time these things collapse like a house of cards.
-
33, you want to change the subject now into the "bigger picture".
Start small. Look at that 10 second clip. There is a small puff of smoke behind the 'object' on the plane. Do you see it.
Then there is a small yellow flash... at the front of the 'attachment'.
Then, there is an impact.
This is some weird shit. Something that shouldn't have been on a plane, doing something that looks like firing (smoke) a projectile (the flash fire and impact) into the building.
Why? I have no clue. You tell me, man! What the F do you see here?
-
I'm not asking you to believe any 'theory'.
I'm asking you to watch that 10-second clip - and tell me what you see.
Do you see a standard airliner hitting a building?
Or do you see an object - which shouldn't be there on a commercial airliner - delivering some sort of smoke then fire flash which shouldn't be there?
Which do you see, 33?
I'm not trying to prove anything, I'm not trying to solve any scooby-doo mystery. I'm asking you to look at 10 seconds of footage and tell me what you see there.
-
I saw a planes' underneath as against the reflection and something fly out of engine just prior to impact. Maybe a bird or something.
-
33, you want to change the subject now into the "bigger picture".
Start small. Look at that 10 second clip. There is a small puff of smoke behind the 'object' on the plane. Do you see it.
Then there is a small yellow flash... at the front of the 'attachment'.
Then, there is an impact.
This is some weird shit. Something that shouldn't have been on a plane, doing something that looks like firing (smoke) a projectile (the flash fire and impact) into the building.
Why? I have no clue. You tell me, man! What the F do you see here?
240 - look aghain - that is the reflection of light and a shadow when it changes angles.
WTF is wrong with you?
I watched it 5 times and realized after the last time, its the light reflection off the aluminmum body.
-
I saw a planes' underneath as against the reflection and something fly out of engine just prior to impact. Maybe a bird or something.
Yep.
I know what I just saw.
333386 just had a "WTF" moment about 911.
He's confused as shit right now. He kinda wants to take a crap now. he didn't know there was an attachment, and he doesn't know why smoke then a flame would come out of it.
He knows it kinda "looks like" some sort of firing attachment - but since logistically it can't work, he has to ignore his lying eys and stick with the other story he's been told(by a media he mistrusts).
Now, he'll keep up the same facade, how it's all nonsense, but the rest of the day, he'll be wondering to himself "I know it's not possible - but how the F did some attachment get on the bottom of the plane? And why wouold it smoke?"
This is how I started man. I KNEW there couldn't be any conspiracy thing to it - but I also know that wasn't a standard airliner hitting. Truth is in the middle somewhere brah.
-
Yep.
I know what I just saw.
333386 just had a "WTF" moment about 911.
He's confused as shit right now. He kinda wants to take a crap now. he didn't know there was an attachment, and he doesn't know why smoke then a flame would come out of it.
He knows it kinda "looks like" some sort of firing attachment - but since logistically it can't work, he has to ignore his lying eys and stick with the other story he's been told(by a media he mistrusts).
Now, he'll keep up the same facade, how it's all nonsense, but the rest of the day, he'll be wondering to himself "I know it's not possible - but how the F did some attachment get on the bottom of the plane? And why wouold it smoke?"
This is how I started man. I KNEW there couldn't be any conspiracy thing to it - but I also know that wasn't a standard airliner hitting. Truth is in the middle somewhere brah.
no, look again - its a light reflection probably from angle of the plane or clouds or something. Come on 240 - you really need to do better than this. i watched it like 10 times and realized what it is.
-
no, look again - its a light reflection probably from angle of the plane or clouds or something. Come on 240 - you really need to do better than this. i watched it like 10 times and realized what it is.
Hey, believe what you want. To me it looks like something different. To me, it's an object that shouldn't be there. That fact alone warrants investigation.
Of course, your methods may vary. I have to go bake cookies now. It's been great debating you, but I truly believe there is something on that plane which doesn't belong (that 19 priks with blades didn't put there).
believe what you want man. I do appreciate you watching it.
-
Hey, believe what you want. To me it looks like something different. To me, it's an object that shouldn't be there. That fact alone warrants investigation.
Of course, your methods may vary. I have to go bake cookies now. It's been great debating you, but I truly believe there is something on that plane which doesn't belong (that 19 priks with blades didn't put there).
believe what you want man. I do appreciate you watching it.
240 - watch it like 10 times in a row and keep in mind what i said regarding a light reflection and you will see what I mean.
-
WRONG 240!!!!
If you cant account for Barba Olsen, the entire house of cards collapses and you know it.
He previously said on the board that she had been secretly released overseas.
-
There are plenty of photos out there that show the plane approaching the tower and there is no "attachment" to be seen in those photos. That particular video shows shadowing. Seen it before, been debunked before. I do so enjoy the entertainment though.
-
These fucking loser CTers have an endless supply of insane theories, so its a waste of time to debate anything with them. The second you kill one theory, another, even more insane one takes its place.
Its obvious 911 was not an inside job as evidenced by the never ending nonsense masquerading as fact that these idiots conjure up in their spare time.
-
These fucking loser CTers have an endless supply of insane theories, so its a waste of time to debate anything with them. The second you kill one theory, another, even more insane one takes its place.
Its obvious 911 was not an inside job as evidenced by the never ending nonsense masquerading as fact that these idiots conjure up in their spare time.
Exactly, there is always something, a while back someone posted some bullshit about people smelling cordite outside the Pentagon. Really? Cordite? How the fuck would they know what cordite smelled like? Did they all server during WWII in the British Navy?
-
Exactly, there is always something, a while back someone posted some bullshit about people smelling cordite outside the Pentagon. Really? Cordite? How the fuck would they know what cordite smelled like? Did they all server during WWII in the British Navy?
240's video is a perfect example of the 911 CT garbage. They confuse a shadow for a 25 foot 'attachment' - ha ha ha ha
-
240's video is a perfect example of the 911 CT garbage. They confuse a shadow for a 25 foot 'attachment' - ha ha ha ha
Perhaps some good can come of this though. If a certain Getbigger were to duplicate the lighting and angle say, in the bedroom. Then perhaps he would no longer be accused of being less than hung by a former girlfriend. Or he might be accused of being on the plane that crashed into the WTC. Either way, it's gotta be good for a few new threads.
-
Plane.
All those vids have been debunked at one time or another.
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggg gggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhht
and building 7 imploded because some debris fell on it
lol
-
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhht
and building 7 imploded because some debris fell on it
lol
::) ::)
Another deluded far left kook chipes in.
Are you a hologram or missle CT'er?
-
::) ::)
Another deluded far left kook chipes in.
Are you a hologram or missle CT'er?
Yeah, fire caused this building to implode.
First time for everything I guess........
(http://911falseflag.com/images/wtc-7.gif)