Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: ToxicAvenger on January 09, 2010, 09:23:58 PM

Title: > Ronnie
Post by: ToxicAvenger on January 09, 2010, 09:23:58 PM
(http://www.mmpower.de/images/Sergio%20Oliva01.jpg)
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: underthestar on January 09, 2010, 09:29:41 PM
Agreed
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: saucetradomous on January 09, 2010, 09:31:29 PM
disagree
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: kiwiol on January 09, 2010, 09:34:21 PM
That's not Dorian Yates
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: WillGrant on January 09, 2010, 11:19:13 PM
He dropped dball like candy but imagine him on gh and other advanced doses of todays competitors.
 :o
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: noeasywayout on January 09, 2010, 11:47:04 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: Pecs on January 09, 2010, 11:51:18 PM
oliva only has the small waist, abs and calves going for him. Ronnie beats him trunks down in the rest of the body.
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: noeasywayout on January 09, 2010, 11:52:56 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: JasonH on January 10, 2010, 01:11:23 AM
(http://www.mmpower.de/images/Sergio%20Oliva01.jpg)

Haha, oh please - Ronnie would have absolutely smoked Sergio.
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: Meso_z on January 10, 2010, 03:47:34 AM
(http://www.mmpower.de/images/Sergio%20Oliva01.jpg)
::)
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 10, 2010, 06:05:50 AM
Ronnie tried
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: johnny1 on January 10, 2010, 06:24:41 AM
This is a better FDB comparison a Near Prime Sergio 1971 233lbs V 2003 Ronnie 282-287lbs
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: Mr Nobody on January 10, 2010, 06:27:11 AM
No one would touch Sergio if he had the drugs of today
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: spinnis on January 10, 2010, 06:31:00 AM
This is a better FDB comparison a Near Prime Sergio 1971 233lbs V 2003 Ronnie 282-287lbs

stupid ass image, yeah olivia had bigger arms then ronnie  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: Hulkster on January 10, 2010, 06:31:29 AM
Ronnie was the modern day Sergio.

great taper, round full muscle bellies (not ugly like dorian) and had that MASS.
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: ToxicAvenger on January 10, 2010, 06:46:43 AM
;D

thanx for proving my point....give him todays drugs (tren wasn't around then)
and ronnie and even dorian would only be after thoughts
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: BuffD on January 10, 2010, 08:16:42 AM
This is a better FDB comparison a Near Prime Sergio 1971 233lbs V 2003 Ronnie 282-287lbs

Ronnie's physique is ugly as hell in that shot.
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: doison on January 10, 2010, 02:32:22 PM
Sergio is doing his "victory" pose in Ronnie's abs. 
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: Mr Nobody on January 10, 2010, 02:33:33 PM
thanx for proving my point....give him todays drugs (tren wasn't around then)
and ronnie and even dorian would only be after thoughts
X2
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: marty31672 on January 10, 2010, 02:36:15 PM
mMMmmmmm just how i like my bodybuilders ... thickly layered mounds of dense muscle
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: JimmyJam1974 on January 10, 2010, 03:00:53 PM
List some of the things that you're better at than Ronnie...
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: Nirvana on January 10, 2010, 03:10:57 PM
Sergio is doing his "victory" pose in Ronnie's abs. 

haha fantastich ;D
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: johnny1 on January 10, 2010, 03:48:49 PM
stupid ass image, yeah olivia had bigger arms then ronnie  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
I think you missed the point of that casual comparison witch was if who ever you are if you are going to post a comparison post one of the 2 @ or near there best, Yes Ronnie was bigger than Sergio, bigger arms, bigger chest, bigger quads, bigger waist, bigger everything....yip.....he was "better" alright.
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 10, 2010, 03:51:52 PM
I think you missed the point of that casual comparison witch was if who ever you are if you are going to post a comparison post one of the 2 @ or near there best, Yes Ronnie was bigger than Sergio, bigger arms, bigger chest, bigger quads, bigger waist, bigger everything....yip.....he was "better" alright.

 ;)
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: johnny1 on January 10, 2010, 04:33:06 PM
;)
Yeah Great shot ND considering that's now 40 YEARS ago :o heres a more defined Sergio Most muscular 38 YEARS ago...
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 10, 2010, 04:35:09 PM
Yeah Great shot ND considering that's now 40 YEARS ago :o heres a more defined Sergio Most muscular 38 YEARS ago...

I mean that's INSANE
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: Hulkster on January 10, 2010, 05:43:47 PM
I think you missed the point of that casual comparison witch was if who ever you are if you are going to post a comparison post one of the 2 @ or near there best, Yes Ronnie was bigger than Sergio, bigger arms, bigger chest, bigger quads, bigger waist, bigger everything....yip.....he was "better" alright.

the comparison is done in typical ironage fashion from the ironage website.

that shot of Ronnie 2003 is probably the worst shot I have ever seen of Ronnie, thats of course, why ironage.com used it.

whenever ironage does comparisons of the golden era guys vs the newer generations, they always use the worse newer shots they can find..
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: Hulkster on January 10, 2010, 05:45:18 PM
this mm shot is my fav. shot of sergio.

look at how thick his pecs are :o
Title: Re: > Ronnie
Post by: johnny1 on January 10, 2010, 08:29:29 PM
the comparison is done in typical ironage fashion from the ironage website.

that shot of Ronnie 2003 is probably the worst shot I have ever seen of Ronnie, thats of course, why ironage.com used it.

whenever ironage does comparisons of the golden era guys vs the newer generations, they always use the worse newer shots they can find..
No again that was a casual comparison between a Champion from another age with a fairly Recent Champion, the first comparison showed a past his best Sergio with sub-par Quads and arms against a Massive more or less in his prime Coleman, all i done was a simple shot of Sergio close to his best against Coleman's shot.

Theres no way im denying Ronnie's more massive, cut, harder etc etc, however again if you are going to make a "who looks better" comparison of BBs do it with pictures with them BOTH in or close to their primes, the 1981 pic of Sergio was 10 years past his best, sort of like making a Comparison of Ronnie Coleman in 2013 vs a 2006 or 2009 Jay Cutler ...yip Jay would "crush" Ronnie.......