Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: spinnis on January 14, 2010, 01:17:11 PM
-
(http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/8453/historylesson.png)
-
(http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/8453/historylesson.png)
awesome
-
hahaahah and she is a negro ....epic idiot..
-
aaahhhaaaahhahahaaa!!
-
WHAT IT DO? I'M LT
-
actually it was about state's rights :P
but funny
-
(http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/8453/historylesson.png)
President Lincoln died for these bitches
-
actually it was about state's rights :P
but funny
State's Rights to own slaves and not be that they could not or should not=Slavery
-
hahaahah and she is a negro ....epic idiot..
I think given people's general level of ignorance(s) these days, her being Black is irrelevant. ;)
-
State's Rights to own slaves and not be that they could not or should not=Slavery
slavery was just the issue at the time, completely irrelevant to the justification of seceding
-
;)
-
actually it was about state's rights :P
but funny
States rights over slavery
-
dummer guy
-
dummer guy
;D ;D
-
;D ;D
;D you got that huh?
-
slavery was just the issue at the time, completely irrelevant to the justification of seceding
yip yip...all about not being governed by a foreign body...free from great britain, but not free from washington.
slavery issue = propaganda, to seem righteous AKA playing the race card
-
;D you got that huh?
No way, what does it mean? ::)
-
State's Rights to own slaves and not be that they could not or should not=Slavery
beat me to it
-
;D you got that huh?
it works in swedish too, just like sieg heil
-
slavery was just the issue at the time, completely irrelevant to the justification of seceding
Exactly it WAS the issue that led to it. "I wann keep my slaves, and you can't tell me what to do. Therefore I don't want to be a part of this nation so I am leaving, Goodbye."
that whole slave state vs free state may be played out again in English speaking state vs Spanish speaking
state.
Go back and please read what you wrote. That is like saying that Tiger's cheating is not what led to the divorce, it was a issue at the the time, totally irrelevant to her wanting a divorce.
As the saying goes, every action has a reaction.
-
it works in swedish too, just like sieg heil
Lol I know :D
-
yip yip...all about not being governed by a foreign body...free from great britain, but not free from washington.
slavery issue = propaganda, to seem righteous AKA playing the race card
And GB was hoping they could sweep in and take back what was "theirs"... Bitches, boths sides N and S being played for fools. Americans are the same as always allowing things to divide them, while others have plans on fucking them over.
-
slavery was just the issue at the time, completely irrelevant to the justification of seceding
I agree it was about States Rights.... :-X
-
Here is the question, if the Confederacy had won, would those black who fought on the side of the Confederates( yes, there many who were stupid enough to willingly fight by their master's sides) have been set free? ;D
-
Here is the question, if the Confederacy had won, would those black who fought on the side of the Confederates( yes, there many who were stupid enough to willingly fight by their master's sides) have been set free? ;D
Maybe. But they certainly wouldn't have got 40 acres and mule like their Northern Brothers did. No, wait. ;D
-
Wiggs is black
-
Wiggs is black
He is!? He doesn't post Black. This. Changes. Everything. >:( ;D
-
Maybe. But they certainly wouldn't have got 40 acres and mule like their Northern Brothers did. No, wait. ;D
I was on YouTube and their is this young black guy who is a staunch Confederate afictionado. And he has vids of descendants of black Confederates getting awards for their ancestors. Needless to say he gets smackdown from both blacks and whites--especially the Racist ones who would rather burn a cross on his lawn.
I sincerely doubt that they would be let free, and maybe those that did fight were thinking that if the South did win, that their good deed would help grant them freedom. But the Aesop Fable of The Fox and the Lion come to mind.
-
I was on YouTube and their is this young black guy who is a staunch Confederate afictionado. And he has vids of descendants of black Confederates getting awards for their ancestors. Needless to say he gets smackdown from both blacks and whites--especially the Racist ones who would rather burn a cross on his lawn.
I sincerely doubt that they would be let free, and maybe those that did fight were thinking that if the South did win, that their good deed would help grant them freedom. But the Aesop Fable of The Fox and the Lion come to mind.
I think you have it here in one. I'm not a huge Spike Lee fan but I've always loved that his production comp. is named '40 acres and a mule.' The subversive in me likes it big time.
-
Swede when will you join the marches Lol :D
seriously though Swede, how does the media portray Swedish Nationalist movements in Sweden? lol
-
Swede when will you join the marches Lol :D
Well, that would mean leaving his apartment and his tracking anklet would signal. ;)
-
Well, that would mean leaving his apartment and his tracking anklet would signal. ;)
;D
-
One of my high school friends had his engagement fall apart recently. Has two kids with the girl. When she changed her facebook status from "engaged" to "single", one of his "friends" clicked the "Like" button and tried to set up a date with the chick. He went over to his house and beat his ass 8)
-
slavery was not the dominating issue.. remember the vast majority of whites in the south did not own a slave.. slavery was a non issue based on the fact that slavery was legal in the united states at the outbreak of the civil war and legal during the war as well.. the proclamation given in '63 did not outlaw slavery.. it outlawed slavery in the seceded states.. not the border states at all.. it was a gimmick to let the federal soldiers (union) take the slaves away so that the south would be unable to use them to build roads , forts ect.. but in union held territories (border states like missouri, kentucky ect) the slaves were still used to build for the union.. a tad bit of hypocrisy to say the least..
we must also remember that lincoln himself stated to douglas that he would let the south have their slaves if it would restore the union.. he said this as late as 1864.. a year after the emancipation proclamation.. so as you can see it was not a big factor in the war.. lincoln tried to discuss a re union of the states in '64 and among the agreements was the south keeping the slaves..
now that being said.. why did the war break out? well.. say you are the south and the largest industry at the time was cotton and this staple is making washington rich.. the south was smart enough to figure out that they held the countries economy in their hands.. why give the profits to washington and the north? the north knew this also.. they also knew that the slaves were bringing in the crops.. so why would they illegalize it?.. they wouldnt..not in the areas with cotton anyway.. so teh south broke away.. (now because of the war the north became a industrial powerhouse and cotton became less of a factor)
so why did the north take on the anti slavery issue.. well.. many dont know this and it is not well documented in our history.. but england was a staunch supporter of the confederacy.. the supplied weapons and clothing for much of the war.. the south, when it saw its fortunes failing, turned to england for military support.. they wanted the blockade killed in the waters around the coast.. england was more than happy to do so since it also wanted a stake in the south and the cotton it held.. one of the obstacles that england had was its anti slavery government.. so deals were made to outlaw slavery in teh south over the next 10 or so years.. they were already granting freedom to those who would fight in 1865 (albeit a bit late).. and the south agreed to get rid of slavery to gain its independence.. we have to remember that slavery was not officially made illegal until years after the war.. the north knew that england would not aid the south because of its slavery stance and the norths (anti) slavery stance.. many also dont know that numerous regiments in the north mutinied when lincoln signed the proclamation stating that they would not fight for or against slavery..
so we have to remember what we do with all wars.. we try and make them sound nobel.. but if ya look real close the only thing that is at issue usually has to do with money and the economy..
-
Thanks Lats, there was a lot I didn't know.
-
slavery was not the dominating issue.. remember the vast majority of whites in the south did not own a slave.. slavery was a non issue based on the fact that slavery was legal in the united states at the outbreak of the civil war and legal during the war as well.. the proclamation given in '63 did not outlaw slavery.. it outlawed slavery in the seceded states.. not the border states at all.. it was a gimmick to let the federal soldiers (union) take the slaves away so that the south would be unable to use them to build roads , forts ect.. but in union held territories (border states like missouri, kentucky ect) the slaves were still used to build for the union.. a tad bit of hypocrisy to say the least..
we must also remember that lincoln himself stated to douglas that he would let the south have their slaves if it would restore the union.. he said this as late as 1864.. a year after the emancipation proclamation.. so as you can see it was not a big factor in the war.. lincoln tried to discuss a re union of the states in '64 and among the agreements was the south keeping the slaves..
now that being said.. why did the war break out? well.. say you are the south and the largest industry at the time was cotton and this staple is making washington rich.. the south was smart enough to figure out that they held the countries economy in their hands.. why give the profits to washington and the north? the north knew this also.. they also knew that the slaves were bringing in the crops.. so why would they illegalize it?.. they wouldnt..not in the areas with cotton anyway.. so teh south broke away.. (now because of the war the north became a industrial powerhouse and cotton became less of a factor)
so why did the north take on the anti slavery issue.. well.. many dont know this and it is not well documented in our history.. but england was a staunch supporter of the confederacy.. the supplied weapons and clothing for much of the war.. the south, when it saw its fortunes failing, turned to england for military support.. they wanted the blockade killed in the waters around the coast.. england was more than happy to do so since it also wanted a stake in the south and the cotton it held.. one of the obstacles that england had was its anti slavery government.. so deals were made to outlaw slavery in teh south over the next 10 or so years.. they were already granting freedom to those who would fight in 1865 (albeit a bit late).. and the south agreed to get rid of slavery to gain its independence.. we have to remember that slavery was not officially made illegal until years after the war.. the north knew that england would not aid the south because of its slavery stance and the norths (anti) slavery stance.. many also dont know that numerous regiments in the north mutinied when lincoln signed the proclamation stating that they would not fight for or against slavery..
so we have to remember what we do with all wars.. we try and make them sound nobel.. but if ya look real close the only thing that is at issue usually has to do with money and the economy..
as usual...
great post btw! very informative!!
-
the civil war was fought to save the union
-
;)
-
re instated
bench
-
"Lats" ties it all together. Good post. Its always about money.....everyone has a price to sellout their ethics and morals. Thats why every politician FAILS in a big way. The road to HELL is paved with good intentions, so true.
-
Where is Goodrum when you need him?
-
The fucking hicks wanted to secede from the Union and Lincoln said fuck that shit...Either you're with us or against us.
So really it turned out not to be that funny if you know history and Wiggs the magic negro knows history 8) ;D
-
Swede when will you join the marches Lol :D
seriously though Swede, how does the media portray Swedish Nationalist movements in Sweden? lol
If you wear ANYTHING which even closley resembles the swedish flags colors = RACIST
If you know the lyrics to our national anthem = RACIST!!
If you actually sing or celebrate out National Day = RACIST!!!!
If you dare to complain about our RETARDED imigration laws = RACIST!!
If you say you love Swedem = RACIST!!!
etc etc
-
Wonder what would've happened if the Southerners won in the Civil War.
Would Oba be prez now?
-
Wonder what would've happened if the Southerners won in the Civil War.
Would Oba be prez now?
That's a good question...not the Obama part though ;D
-
That's a good question...not the Obama part though ;D
If we skip the Obama part, makes you think doesn't it?
How would US of A be today if the South had won?
-
If you wear ANYTHING which even closley resembles the swedish flags colors = RACIST
If you know the lyrics to our national anthem = RACIST!!
If you actually sing or celebrate out National Day = RACIST!!!!
If you dare to complain about our RETARDED imigration laws = RACIST!!
If you say you love Swedem = RACIST!!!
etc etc
Why is this Swede?
-
Why is this Swede?
I wonder about that myself
-
Why is this Swede?
It wasn't like this in the 70's, this "phenomenon" came in the 90's i believe.
-
I wonder about that myself
You need to change that.
-
You need to change that.
I am slowley but surley lol.
If I got one dollar for everytime ive been called a racist JUST for saying I like sweden and we should re-think the whole imigration concept we have going on, I would be a millionaire.
Still remember to this day on a classphoto when a kid (14yr old) had the swedish national football jersey on, and then when the photo appeared they had edited out his shirt and covered it up, because the principal didn't want to school to come across as a racist school.
I think I would have killed him if it had happened here. at least ruined his house and car
-
I am slowley but surley lol.
If I got one dollar for everytime ive been called a racist JUST for saying I like sweden and we should re-think the whole imigration concept we have going on, I would be a millionaire.
Still remember to this day on a classphoto when a kid (14yr old) had the swedish national football jersey on, and then when the photo appeared they had edited out his shirt and covered it up, because the principal didn't want to school to come across as a racist school.
I think I would have killed him if it had happened here. at least ruined his house and car
there is nothing wrong with being proud of your Nation, there is nothing wrong with sayin "I'm reppin' Sweden, B####, And What!"
that's not being racist. If people don't like you saying I'm Swedish, then those pansy people need to leave Sweden. Have you seen any Brazilians there and do they complain?
-
there is nothing wrong with being proud of your Nation, there is nothing wrong with sayin "I'm reppin' Sweden, B####, And What!"
that's not being racist. If people don't like you saying I'm Swedish, then those pansy people need to leave Sweden. Have you seen any Brazilians there and do they complain?
nope, and no blacks really either, TURKS however.
also keep in mind its like 8 of 10 rapes in sweden are done by turks, but DONT DARE to mentioned that because then you're a racist.
-
There is no denying that things in Sweden has become more "complicated" since the 70s with such a huge influx of immigrants.
There is also no denying that areas such as "Rosengård" and similar (we have many similar areas such as these now) are quite problematic.
-
Swede when will you join the marches Lol :D
seriously though Swede, how does the media portray Swedish Nationalist movements in Sweden? lol
Swedens neutrality during WW2 seems to be always played down!...... :-X Its neighbor Norway suffered greatly!!!
-
And GB was hoping they could sweep in and take back what was "theirs"... Bitches, boths sides N and S being played for fools. Americans are the same as always allowing things to divide them, while others have plans on fucking them over.
:o
getbig.com was involved in this :o