Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Benny B on February 18, 2010, 08:18:36 PM
-
Carter 42%change during presidency
Reagan (an embarrassing) 189% change :o
Bush I 56% change
Clinton 36% change
Bush II 89% change :o
http://presidentialdebt.org/
-
::)
-
Carter 42%change during presidency
Reagan (an embarrassing) 189% change :o
Bush I 56% change
Clinton 36% change
Bush II 89% change :o
http://presidentialdebt.org/
I guess the brutal beating you took in the other thread(s) wasn't enough. Dude, you must be a glutton for punishment!!
-
I guess the brutal beating you took in the other thread(s) wasn't enough. Dude, you must be a glutton for punishment!!
Which thread was this, assclown? ???
You must think I have time to follow you retards all day.
There was no "brutal beating" if I wasn't even there, dipshit. ::) And we sure as heck know your dumb ass has never intellectually whipped another adult in your life.
-
Do u do this to try and convince yourself that the galactically epic failure u voted for isn't the worst president in our history. I guess u don't like being tied to him...sorry doucchbag but ur just as guilty as every other hope and change assclown.
-
Why dont you post who was in control of congress during those periods Benny since they are the ones responsible for spending the money.
I guess you were too stoned that day and missed civics 101.
-
::)
Why don't you put the projected expenses by Obama?
By the way, it is a myth that there was a surplus during Clinton's presidency. This point has already been talked/chatted about to death. There was no surplus.
-
Why don't you put the projected expenses by Obama?
By the way, it is a myth that there was a surplus during Clinton's presidency. This point has already been talked/chatted about to death. There was no surplus.
Benny found some idiotic nonsense on DU, like blacken does, and raced over here to post it thinking it would prove some idiotic point.
He doesnt understand that most of us see through these little moronic things and know that he is intentionally leaving out the fact that the dems controlled congress for most of these periods are are equally responsible for the prolifigate spending.
-
Or the fact that Clinton did not have a 200 Billion surplus, I have posted the info from the CBO, but the libs assclowns keep trying to act like this shit is real.
-
Regardless of Clinton's surplus numbers it was a very prosperous economic time. Some will say Regan set it up or Bush 1 set it up for him, others will say it's because of a democratic president, yet others will add it's because of a republican controlled house. To be honest the president does have a lot to do with it but really Clinton was helped by a dot com bubble and a recovering financial market that had crashed during the 80's and was moving into an historic high.
That being said i don't agree with deregulation and tax cuts across the board. I prefer a more democratic approach where taxes are cut for lower income earners and capped at 40% for higher income earners. User pay taxes appeal to me to make up for any shortfall there may be from a lack of income tax.
-
Regardless of Clinton's surplus numbers it was a very prosperous economic time. Some will say Regan set it up or Bush 1 set it up for him, others will say it's because of a democratic president, yet others will add it's because of a republican controlled house. To be honest the president does have a lot to do with it but really Clinton was helped by a dot com bubble and a recovering financial market that had crashed during the 80's and was moving into an historic high.
That being said i don't agree with deregulation and tax cuts across the board. I prefer a more democratic approach where taxes are cut for lower income earners and capped at 40% for higher income earners. User pay taxes appeal to me to make up for any shortfall there may be from a lack of income tax.
LOWER INCOME PEOPLE DONT PAY INCOME TAXES.
-
LOWER INCOME PEOPLE DONT PAY INCOME TAXES.
They shouldn't. The first $20K-$25K you earn should be federal tax free. There should also be a maximum of 25% capital gains tax for anyone earning that amount.
-
No, everyone earning any income should pay taxes.
Either we should have a flat tax or a national sales tax and thats it.
-
No, everyone earning any income should pay taxes.
Either we should have a flat tax or a national sales tax and thats it.
Don't agree with you on this one 333 sorry.
-
I see Benny has disappeared once again!
-
Which thread was this, assclown? ???
You must think I have time to follow you retards all day.
There was no "brutal beating" if I wasn't even there, dipshit. ::) And we sure as heck know your dumb ass has never intellectually whipped another adult in your life.
Does this ring a bell? And yes Benny, we knew you were not there!
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=320278.0
-
I see Benny has disappeared once again!
Uh there was no ownage in that thread, other than ownage of those fools who said the stimulus did nothing.
Keep sticking to posting article by your non existent friendships with actual trainers like Alwyn Cosgrove, as if you actually have an opinion that matters. ::)
-
Uh there was no ownage in that thread, other than ownage of those fools who said the stimulus did nothing.
Keep sticking to posting article by your non existent friendships with actual trainers like Alwyn Cosgrove, as if you actually have an opinion that matters. ::)
The stim bill did alot KC.
-
The title should be changed to
Benny Blanco...A history of failed posts he'd like to forget
-
Carter 42%change during presidency
Reagan (an embarrassing) 189% change :o
Bush I 56% change
Clinton 36% change
Bush II 89% change :o
http://presidentialdebt.org/
Benny, you kidding me?? Under both Reagan and Bush Jr. the job growth and revenue to the fed was threw the roof! How was this done?? Not tax and spend, but by cutting taxes. The Republicans lost their wwy yes. But to say DEMOCRATS are more FISCALLY conservative is like calling Al Sharpton a Civil Rights activist.
-
Reagan was in the process of defeating the Soviet union,while democrats like dumb ass Joe Biden fought him every step of the way.His deficit went up because he was in a weapons race.However,revenues to the government were never higher,he helped create 20,000,000 jobs and all this after following the second wprst president in history after Obama.Reagan will be a legendary figure forevor,Carter will be seen as an utter failure as will Obama and Clinto will be remembered for dropping spooge on a blue dress.
-
Reagan was in the process of defeating the Soviet union,while democrats like dumb ass Joe Biden fought him every step of the way.His deficit went up because he was in a weapons race.However,revenues to the government were never higher,he helped create 20,000,000 jobs and all this after following the second wprst president in history after Obama.Reagan will be a legendary figure forevor,Carter will be seen as an utter failure as will Obama and Clinto will be remembered for dropping spooge on a blue dress.
chirp, chirp, chirp... Anyone see Benny???? chirp chirp... pretty quiet in here.
-
chirp, chirp, chirp... Anyone see Benny???? chirp chirp... pretty quiet in here.
Reagan was truly the man.
-
Regan wasn't 'the man' at all ::) Nixon for all his faults was a much smarter politician than the actor Regan could ever hope to be.
-
Regan wasn't 'the man' at all ::) Nixon for all his faults was a much smarter politician than the actor Regan could ever hope to be.
1. Took us off the gold standard.
2. Opened us up to competition with slave labor from china
3. Created the EPA
No thanks.
-
Do u do this to try and convince yourself that the galactically epic failure u voted for,,,,.
you referring to George W. Bush?
-
you referring to George W. Bush?
ZING!
-
ZING!
No, I think he was referring to the man-child in office right now.
-
No, I think he was referring to the man-child in office right now.
You're no fun 333.
-
You're no fun 333.
I'm heading to the gym for squats, leg press, cleans, military press old school style.
-
I'm heading to the gym for squats, leg press, cleans, military press old school style.
Interesting split you got there. I can't do cleans on a leg day i find it too taxing to my front squat and my front squat too taxing for my cleans if i switch up the order. Don't like leg press much either i'd rather do reverse deficit lunges or bulgarian split squats.
-
LOWER INCOME PEOPLE DONT PAY INCOME TAXES.
Haha. Thanks, buddy, it's been depressing here as of late and I needed a good laugh.
Of the 42 states levying income taxes in 2005, nineteen taxed two-parent families of four living in poverty, and sixteen taxed impoverished single-parent families of three, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), which has tracked state income-tax data since the early 1990s.
According to the CBPP, while some states have recently reformed their tax codes to relieve the lower income brackets, others have simply let their income-tax thresholds stagnate. This has allowed inflation to drive the tax floor below the federal poverty line – about $16,600 for a family of three in the lower 48 states and the District of Columbia. The study also found that 31 states taxed families with incomes just above the official poverty line, pulling them back toward financial insecurity.
http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2879
-
Still no Benny?
-
I'm heading to the gym for squats, leg press, cleans, military press old school style.
nothing better than a man with hard tight firm ass and legs.
-
nothing better than a man with hard tight firm ass and legs.
Oh lord I am not going near that.
Second, why dont dems like your self acknowledge the fact that the GOP congress had an equal role in clintons' success economically?
Third, why dont you guys accept the fact that the dems have controlled the congress since 2006 and everything has gotten "progressively" worse since then?
-
Oh lord I am not going near that.
Second, why dont dems like your self acknowledge the fact that the GOP congress had an equal role in clintons' success economically?
Third, why dont you guys accept the fact that the dems have controlled the congress since 2006 and everything has gotten "progressively" worse since then?
because the only thing(s) I take seriously on a steroid site are the threads about roids...
-
Regan wasn't 'the man' at all ::) Nixon for all his faults was a much smarter politician than the actor Regan could ever hope to be.
A much smarter politician that never translated to being a good president. You are off your rocker if you don't think Reagan was a better president than Nixon and Clinton. And Clinton's presidency was marred, not only by the lie on the surplus, but the tech bubble bursting resulting in over 2 million jobs lost. We have not seen prosperous times like we saw during the Reagan administration.
Read up on your history before you post here. You are dumbing down the whole board with your posts.