Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: affeman on February 19, 2010, 05:54:44 AM
-
http://clips.team-andro.com/watch/6ec386cb64df22dff37b/Superstar-Seminar-Ronnie-Coleman-Phil-Heath-Dexter-Jackson
-
huge fucking arms on 3 of them.. :o
-
http://clips.team-andro.com/watch/6ec386cb64df22dff37b/Superstar-Seminar-Ronnie-Coleman-Phil-Heath-Dexter-Jackson
Hahahahahahahahahaha Great stuff !
Stupid Hulkster owned by his own hero yet again ;D
not one single mention of 1999 by anyone and Ronnie admits once again 1998 was his best! Hulkster when push comes to shove you have nothing as usual which is why I own you like the dummy you are. ;)
-
Lol, Ronnie is clearly wrong there because Hulkster, by his gathering of corraborating evidence, thinks 1999 was his best. :)
-
Hulkster wont recover from this.
-
Lol, Ronnie is clearly wrong there because Hulkster, by his gathering of corraborating evidence, thinks 1999 was his best. :)
Hahahahahahaha that's gotta suck , first your own hero says on multiple occasions he couldn't beat Dorian now he says multiple times 1998 is his best and NOT 1999 like that moron claimed and like Hulkster said before , " Ronnie knows more about Ronnie " hahahahahaha
-
lmao @ a bunch of queens arguing over which muscle man has the best body...
-
Hulkster wont recover from this.
Hulkster never recovered from Ronnie admitting he wouldn't beat Dorian ;D Hulkster is owned as usual like the fucking complete moron he is.
-
sounds like ND is still bitter from being overworked at the flower shop on Valentine's day.. :-X
-
ND also forgets that his hero Peter McGough regards ronnie's AC win to be his best shape, followed by 99 and then 98.
notice:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
no mention of 98 anywhere by ND's hero and saviour of bodybuilding LOL
::)
not to mention the fact that as far as Mr. Olympia appearences go, McGough regards Ronnie 99 to be the best ever, above that of dorian especially.
highlight those instances where the winner advanced the sport on that particular day. With that in mind, I would nominate the following.
McGough feels Ronnie 99's olympia physique advanced the sport.
which is by definition - advancing the sport above the level that dorian took it.
ND owned and on suicide watch now.
-
sounds like ND is still bitter from being overworked at the flower shop on Valentine's day.. :-X
Sounds like you're wrong as usual ! ;) and owned
-
ND also forgets that his hero Peter McGough regards ronnie's AC win to be his best shape, followed by 99 and then 98.
notice:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
no mention of 98 anywhere by ND's hero and saviour of bodybuilding LOL
::)
not to mention the fact that as far as Mr. Olympia appearences go, McGough regards Ronnie 99 to be the best ever, above that of dorian especially.
McGough feels Ronnie 99's olympia physique advanced the sport.
which is by definition - advancing the sport above the level that dorian took it.
ND owned and on suicide watch now.
What does Ronnie Coleman have to say once again? yeah I thought so ;)
Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot
Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.
I had guys in front of me who had beaten me for the last ten years or so. Nobody picked me to go in and win that show because I had gotten ninth the year before. I had to come with an incredible package and blow all the judges away and that's what I pretty much did.
He also said on Special Ed's Radio show his first Olympia was his best more specific because his conditioning was spot-on ;)
and to use your own quote against you ( Ronnie ) he knows more than you and more than McGough ever will about his own physique..
so let's recap , Hulkster is WRONG as usual WRONG on every single point WRONG 1999 was his best WRONG that he was better conditioned in 1999 compared to 1998 AND WRONG that Ronnie was 10 pounds heavier in 1999 compared to 2001 while having identical conditioning
Hulkster it sucks to be you constantly being owned by me and Ronnie sucker ;)
Checkmate thanks for playing continue with your meltdown moron. ;D
-
Lol, Ronnie is clearly wrong there because Hulkster, by his gathering of corraborating evidence, thinks 1999 was his best. :)
Hulkster actually believed all those sharpened 99 screencaps lol real life evidence is from the guy who is in question and what does he say?
1998 destroys 1999 ;D
-
Who gives a shit what Ronnie says. Does anyone really think that he has the mental capacity to think and evaluate anything?
-
Who gives a shit what Ronnie says. Does anyone really think that he has the mental capacity to think and evaluate anything?
Yes Ronnie can barely tie his shoes his IQ is low 70s ::) because he's not college educated ::) because he doesn't have a degree in accounting ::)
-
Who gives a shit what Ronnie says. Does anyone really think that he has the mental capacity to think and evaluate anything?
He was smart enough to know when he was outclassed.
-
He was smart enough to know when he was outclassed.
Hahahahaha you got that right ! he's smarter than Hulkster who claims Ronnie he knows more than you and more than McGough ever will about his own physique..
Epic thread , Epic backfire for Hulkster and Epic stupidity in claiming he knows anything about competitive bodybuilding. ;D
-
What does Ronnie Coleman have to say once again?
he says he was in better shape in 1999 than in 1998 right here:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year
everyone take note of how ND ignores ronnie's own words in this victory seminar.
and then acts like Ronnie has always said he was in better shape in 98
::)
it just bugs ND that I know this stuff and post it to expose his bullshit.
ND hopes there are people out there that don't know all this stuff.
too bad for him that people like me are smarter and more knowledgable than that.
and we don't let him get away with posting half truths and bits and parts of the whole story.
-
fact is as I have shown above, Ronnie has publicly stated that his 99 shape was better than his 98 shape.
but ND was banking on the fact that few people know this.
too bad for him I am always one step ahead of him.
it must be embarassing to post and then have someone expose you for being deceptive.
-
Now folks, what year was it that Ronnie said he couldnt beat Dorian so he gave up.
-
that was back in 19inND'sdreams.
-
that was back in 19inND'sdreams.
;D
-
Hahahahahahahahahaha Great stuff !
Stupid Hulkster owned by his own hero yet again ;D
not one single mention of 1999 by anyone and Ronnie admits once again 1998 was his best! Hulkster when push comes to shove you have nothing as usual which is why I own you like the dummy you are. ;)
Every one of the bodybuilding experts on that stage says 03 was his best. You talk BS. Ronnie enjoyed 98 the most cos it was his first. Everyone else in that video thinks 03 was his finest hour. Excuse me if I listen to them over you. You and Rocketswitch et al have attempted to surmise he looked better in 96/97 bwaha. Says it all.
-
wow, ND pretty much got destroyed by that video. So much for his claim that "none of the experts say 03 was Ronnie's prime"
-
Every one of the bodybuilding experts on that stage says 03 was his best. You talk BS. Ronnie enjoyed 98 the most cos it was his first. Everyone else in that video thinks 03 was his finest hour. Excuse me if I listen to them over you. You and Rocketswitch et al have attempted to surmise he looked better in 96/97 bwaha. Says it all.
Every one of the bodybuilding experts on that stage says 03 was his best. You talk BS. Ronnie enjoyed 98 the most cos it was his first.
The majority of people believe 2003 was his best year which is easy to see why.
I'm in the growing number of people that believe 1999 was his best appearance.
A recent poll @ MD shows 1999 ranking above 1998 and 2003 in 1st.
Link to poll: http://forums.musculardevelopment.com/showthread.php?t=55162&highlight=Coleman
He may have been a little drier in 1998 but the only place this showed in increased definition
compared to 1999 was in his back; and only very slightly.
Starting at 4:50 he explains why he was better in 1999 than 1998.
A few quotes from writers who were there comparing 1999 to 1998.
Ronnie Coleman (1st place) must have been really psyched and motivated in the past year. He came in looking bigger, harder, denser, and more striated than last year. He was very aware of his condition and showed it off from all 360°. Ronnie is the king when it comes to muscularity. He was given straight 1st place votes by all judges in all rounds.
Lou Messina/East Coast Muscle
Last year, Ronnie was about ten pounds heavier and he was just as ripped as when he won the contest the first time in 1998.
Natural Mr. Olympia - John Hansen
Ronnie was gargantuan, herculean, and every adjective in between.
He was ripped, sharper than last year, and filled with a champions confidence.
Musclemag International/Johnny Fitness
In his first defense of the Mr. O title, Coleman exhibited size, condition and sinew-splitting fullness he lacked a year earlier. At 257 pounds, he was so separated that he looked like a walking anatomy chart.
1999 Olympia DVD description - Ronnie Coleman was again crowned 'king' of the Olympia, this time with a perfect score from all judges in all rounds. Ronnie's second victory saw him 10 pounds heavier than last year, and just as 'cut'. See all the drama as Flex is announced in second place!
In 1999 his physique just seemed more complete with very close to the same condition.
The added mass, especially to his delts made every pose; relaxed or flexing look better.
My 2 cents to an inprovable debate.
1998 and 1999 - close to the same lighting...
-
he says he was in better shape in 1999 than in 1998 right here:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
Yeah, that interview sounds like a reliable source.... ::)
Question: Did you take Creatine?
Ronnie: No. I didn’t take too much Creatine this year for some reason. I guess ‘cause I was usin’ all that Glutamine. So I just didn’t use a lot of Creatine for some reason, but I did the year before that. So it all depends.
Question: How long did you use Glutamine?
Ronnie: Glutamine all the way up ‘til the week after.
Question: How did you flush all the water out?
Ronnie: Basically just quit drinkin’ water. Maybe a glass or two a day. Like maybe just the water I used to take my vitamins, I still drank those. When I got really, really dry I had that craving.
-
Good idea to stop drinking water. In the wonderful world of bodybuilding you have to make small sacrifices.
-
Yeah, that interview sounds like a reliable source.... ::)
'Cause. Usin'. 'Til. Drinkin'. Classic.
-
99>>>>98
99 Best Ronnie Ever.
-
he says he was in better shape in 1999 than in 1998 right here:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
everyone take note of how ND ignores ronnie's own words in this victory seminar.
and then acts like Ronnie has always said he was in better shape in 98
::)
it just bugs ND that I know this stuff and post it to expose his bullshit.
ND hopes there are people out there that don't know all this stuff.
too bad for him that people like me are smarter and more knowledgable than that.
and we don't let him get away with posting half truths and bits and parts of the whole story.
he says he was in better shape in 1999 than in 1998 right here:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
everyone take note of how ND ignores ronnie's own words in this victory seminar.
and then acts like Ronnie has always said he was in better shape in 98
::)
it just bugs ND that I know this stuff and post it to expose his bullshit.
Awwwwww poor little Hulkster reduced to lying now because he looks like a moron as usual. I never ignored Ronnie's own words in fact you morons have been for years now and why? because they contradict your bullshit claims and more specifically I never ignored this quote not for a moment and why? because everyone says they looked their best after the contest what matters more importantly is what has he said subsequently? what has he said multiple times after this quote stupid?
Well lets start with the most recent , he said on that video once again 1998 was his best ( strike one ) he's said on Special Ed's radio show 1998 was his best Olympia because his condition was ' spot-on ' ( strike two ) and in another interview he stated his first Olympia was his best because ' everything was spot-on for that show ' ( strike three you're out )
These THREE quotes render that one obsolete you fucking dummy.
ND hopes there are people out there that don't know all this stuff.
too bad for him that people like me are smarter and more knowledgable than that.
and we don't let him get away with posting half truths and bits and parts of the whole story
You don't know your stuff that's a proven fucking fact twenty times over. what's funny is you just tried to put down my intelligence and what do you do? spell knowledgeable wrong LMFAO as usual epic backfire you dummy. ;)
continue with your meltdown moron. and stick 1999 up your ass ;)
-
fact is as I have shown above, Ronnie has publicly stated that his 99 shape was better than his 98 shape.
but ND was banking on the fact that few people know this.
too bad for him I am always one step ahead of him.
it must be embarassing to post and then have someone expose you for being deceptive.
Fact is I have shown 3 times subsequent to that quote Ronnie has said publicly 1998 was his best it's embarrassing ( another word you can't seem to spell ) for you to be constantly proven wrong by me and Ronnie ;)
-
Every one of the bodybuilding experts on that stage says 03 was his best. You talk BS. Ronnie enjoyed 98 the most cos it was his first. Everyone else in that video thinks 03 was his finest hour. Excuse me if I listen to them over you. You and Rocketswitch et al have attempted to surmise he looked better in 96/97 bwaha. Says it all.
No in fact they didn't many said 1998 go listen again and they said they liked 2003 because he was the most freakiest not because he was at his best overall shape , go listen again and shall I post the avalanche of quotes that say 2001 is his best?
Listen to Ronnie over me and what does he say? yeah I thought so ;) go cry like Hulkster because Ronnie shuts your shit down you're in good company with that little bitch ;D
-
wow, ND pretty much got destroyed by that video. So much for his claim that "none of the experts say 03 was Ronnie's prime"
You and Hulkster and the other nutt-huggers got destroyed what did Ronnie say? yeah I thought so and he trumps you and did you even listen to that? did you? Heath said he liked 1998 better and 2003 was just ' retarded ' , Troy Alves said he liked 1998 better the only one who said 2003 was his best bar-none was the guy who looked like he just walked out of Nike Town and he said because he was the biggest & freakiest and Dexter never gave an answer he said backstage when Ronnie got undressed he knew the contest was over
More examples of your comprehension problems and lets see what the ' experts say ' about Ronnie's best ;)
-
No in fact they didn't many said 1998 go listen again and they said they liked 2003 because he was the most freakiest not because he was at his best overall shape , go listen again and shall I post the avalanche of quotes that say 2001 is his best?
Listen to Ronnie over me and what does he say? yeah I thought so ;) go cry like Hulkster because Ronnie shuts your shit down you're in good company with that little bitch ;D
Do you think Ronnie will still keep guest posing? He keeps stating a comeback to the O but will it happen? My thing is it wont happen.
-
take it to the bedroom you two
-
Time to bitch slap some fan boys ;)
Joe Weider - IFBB Co-Founder
"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."
Oppssss NO 1999 NO 2003 what happened?
Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer
"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"
I don't believe he said 1999 or 2003 ;D
Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49
"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."
oh 1999 and 2003 where are you? I don't see you ;)
Flex Magazine March 2009
Tales from Columbus
2001 (2): Is Chris Cormier unlucky? Are Bob Cicherillo's threads so loud that he's being sponsored by a megaphone company? At the 2001 Arnold Classic, for the only time in its history, the reigning Mr. Olympia entered the contest. Not only that, but said Mr. Olympia, Ronnie Coleman, was in the best shape of his career, before or since. Now that is bad luck.
No he wasn't he was in the best shape of his career in 1999 and in 2003 ::)
Flex Magazine March 2008
2001 Then-reigning Mr. Olympia Ronnie Coleman, in the shape of his life at 245 pounds, took this one, with Cormier gaining the second of his six consecutive runner-up positions.
did they mean 1999 or 2003?
Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot
Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.
I had guys in front of me who had beaten me for the last ten years or so. Nobody picked me to go in and win that show because I had gotten ninth the year before. I had to come with an incredible package and blow all the judges away and that's what I pretty much did.
Ronnie clearly can't be right about 1998 when he was so much better in 1999 and in 2003
Flex Magazine August 2003
Jim Schmatltz on Ronnie chances of winning six Olympias in a row
if he repeats his 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic form, he'll experience the joy of six.
if he repeats his 1999? opppsss nope sorry
Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004
As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.
still looking for 1999 and 2003 , still no luck
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian.
best ever was 1999 stop it no 2003 ::)
Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005
Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.
1999 and 2003 M.I.A again
you can go lick your wounds now fan-boys ;)
-
Yeah, that interview sounds like a reliable source.... ::)
What's funny is these guys for an eternity have outright tried to dismiss Ronnie's words claimed he was ' not to bright ' and a ' liar , he lies about everything ' now the hypocrite needs Ronnie to be right when it suits his purposes
-
Yeah, that interview sounds like a reliable source....
I love it.
not only do the nuthuggers have to claim that the 99 ronnie shots/vids are faked and enhanced, but now they have to claim that transcripts from his seminar are faked too.
::)
anyone see a pattern here? ::)
this is unreal. :-\
-
I hope you all realize that the more have to resort to saying that pics/videos and now interviews are faked, the weaker your argument gets.
actually, it pretty much nullifies anything you say.
what kind of argument does one have if their only premise is that all the real life evidence on the opposing side is fake?
answer: none.
it just goes to show you how strong our argument is.
saying everything is faked is your only option, isn't it?
sad sad sad.
-
I love it.
not only do the nuthuggers have to claim that the 99 ronnie shots/vids are faked and enhanced, but now they have to claim that transcripts from his seminar are faked too.
::)
anyone see a pattern here? ::)
this is unreal. :-\
NO one said it was fake as usual that's you drawing your own conclusions because you don't have anything !
he said it after the Olympia like everyone says , and subsequent he said three-fucking-times 1998 was his best so shut up crybaby as usual Ronnie owns you
what he said at the seminar was WRONG and obsolete he's been real consistent on what year as his best and it sure as fuck ain't 1999
and we do see a pattern here of you getting your ass kicked in every thread you type in , I see another pattern of you calling Ronnie a liar and then clinging to his words like law , hypocrite
-
I hope you all realize that the more have to resort to saying that pics/videos and now interviews are faked, the weaker your argument gets.
actually, it pretty much nullifies anything you say.
what kind of argument does one have if their only premise is that all the real life evidence on the opposing side is fake?
answer: none.
it just goes to show you how strong our argument is.
saying everything is faked is your only option, isn't it?
sad sad sad.
Hahahahaha meltdown now you're claiming people are saying interviews are fake , hey stupid he was interviewed THREE times after that and guess what THREE times he said 1998 was his best , Phil Heath said 1998 was his best , Troy Alves said 1998 was his best , Joe Weider said 1998 was his best , Shawn Perine said 1998 was his best
you have nothing , you're a joke go crawl back and your hole and cry about how much better he was in 1999 moron , you know nothing and have nothing.
-
now you're claiming people are saying interviews are fake
don't you fucking know how to read?:
::)
Yeah, that interview sounds like a reliable source....
-
I love it.
ronnie says 98 was his best three times
ronnie says 99 was better than 98.
pics and videos show 99 was better than 98.
but ND only clings to what fits his agenda, ignoring everything else, including real life pics and videos LOL
ND, you are getting sadder and sadder by the day.
-
I love it.
ronnie says 98 was his best three times
ronnie says 99 was better than 98.
pics and videos show 99 was better than 98.
but ND only clings to what fits his agenda, ignoring everything else, including real life pics and videos LOL
ND, you are getting sadder and sadder by the day.
You love what? That your getting fucking raped by your hero? Your an idiot.
Ronnie says 98 was his best 3 time, all AFTER he said 99 was better than 98. So that means, guess what genius,... HE CHANGED HIS MIND!!!! He looked back through history and objectively said, "OK, 98 was my best ever" His previous quote was rendered invalid
Everyone always says "this is my best conditioning ever" on the day of the show Lol. Now your proving beyond the shadow of a doubt how incapable of grasping basic logic you are. And as far as sad... stop projecting on him, you the one that looks sad. ND is not the one having his point nullified by the person he's arguing for. Fucking LOL ;D
-
LOL changed his mind?
more like forgot how good he looked.
as mentioned above, everyone has fond memories of their first time.
and so what if he changed his mind? does that mean just because he THINKS he was better in 98 that he actually WAS?
fuck no.
guess what?:
the video tape and pics don't change over time:
99>>>>>98:
and it shows EVERY time.
deal with it losers:
:P
-
Question:
will the guy's EVER be able to support anything they say with pics and visuals?
Answer: never have yet. and probably never will.
they spend all their time arguing that the pics and videos are faked, whether its about dorian vs ronnie or even ronnie's opinion of his best ever shape LOL
why do they do this? because all the pics and vids show they are WRONG.
the very definition of a losing argument.
-
LOL changed his mind?
more like forgot how good he looked.
as mentioned above, everyone has fond memories of their first time.
and so what if he changed his mind? does that mean just because he THINKS he was better in 98 that he actually WAS?
fuck no.
guess what?:
the video tape and pics don't change over time:
99>>>>>98:
and it shows EVERY time.
deal with it losers:
:P
Lol. And you call ND sad. Now your refuting the words of the person who actually competed. You are sad my friend. Forgot how he looked? Fucking lol. The day of the show everyone thinks theyre in there best shape. You are a fucking mess Hulkster, truely a mess. Your actually trying to argue the words of the person who got in that shape, was there on the stage and who knows his history better than anyone.
You are now trying to argue absolutley everyone; that Hulkster is right, everyone else is wrong, the people who were there, the Competitor himself.. and all this based on a few lousy screencaps, some pics and a video. You are truely lost. :-\
-
LOL changed his mind?
more like forgot how good he looked.
as mentioned above, everyone has fond memories of their first time.
and so what if he changed his mind? does that mean just because he THINKS he was better in 98 that he actually WAS?
fuck no.
guess what?:
the video tape and pics don't change over time:
99>>>>>98:
and it shows EVERY time.
deal with it losers:
:P
Lol, just wow. Let's all make our minds up based on two pics....one of which is about 50 feet away. Hulkster, you are pathetic. Que in the sharpened 99 pics in 3...2...1...
It is just stupid to argue that his conditioning was better in 99, Hulkster. Maybe he was fuller and you prefer his 99 form, but that is your opinion - he wasn't drier though. If I am going to value anyone's opinion, it would first be Ronnie himself, and second those who saw him in person.
-
Question:
will the guy's EVER be able to support anything they say with pics and visuals?
Answer: never have yet. and probably never will.
they spend all their time arguing that the pics and videos are faked, whether its about dorian vs ronnie or even ronnie's opinion of his best ever shape LOL
why do they do this? because all the pics and vids show they are WRONG.
the very definition of a losing argument.
Wow you're really losing it over what Ronnie said huh? Trying to quickly turn conversation away from the fact your own hero completely nullified your argument? Gotta try and tell everyone youre winning? Hurts huh> Sucks now you gotta take on the Dorian fans AND Ronnie. Ouch. :-\
-
Who gives a shit what Ronnie says. Does anyone really think that he has the mental capacity to think and evaluate anything?
FYI
THE BEEF copied this and pasted these pics and sent them along with MindSpin's real name to Ronnies email addy which is avaliable on his website.
What type of asshole makes statements like this about this sports greatest bodybuilder?
THE BEEF
PS: Can anyone on this site say that this piece of boy bait is heterosexual? ANYONE?
-
Trying to quickly turn conversation away from the fact your own hero completely nullified your argument?
he did?
you mean he actually showed footage and pics of him being better in 98 than in 99?
I missed that.
::)
ronnie's opinon was right the first time. and its proved by real life.
sorry if you feel otherwise.
::)
-
he did?
you mean he actually showed footage and pics of him being better in 98 than in 99?
I missed that.
::)
ronnie's opinon was right the first time. and its proved by real life.
sorry if you feel otherwise.
::)
"proved by real life" would mean by those who really saw him in person, or better yet, by Ronnie himself correct? Not by your carefully selected pics -- they are NOT real life. Amazingly, you are too blunt to understand this.
-
he did?
you mean he actually showed footage and pics of him being better in 98 than in 99?
I missed that.
::)
ronnie's opinon was right the first time. and its proved by real life.
sorry if you feel otherwise.
::)
The only thing the pics prove is that in YOUR OPINION 99 was his best. The whole sport of bodybuilding is about opinions. This is why any time a winner is announced you hear people bitch for the next 4 weeks about how this guy got screwed and that guy got a gift. You LOVE Ronnie and that's fine but it's YOUR OPINION that he looks better in 99. Don't pull that "well people can say King Kamali looks better than Ronnie but that doesn't make them right" shit. My 13 yr old does that. When comparing the truly best in the world peole will have different opinions and just because it's different than yours then it doesn't make them wrong. Hell in that 99 pic you CONSTANTLY post I think Cormier looks better than Ronnie. Ronnie just has an ugly physique mostly due to his horrible 4 pack abs. My opinion there Hulky boy.
-
yes, ronnie himself:
didn't you read his 99 victory seminar that I posted.
he states quite clearly he was better in 99 than in 98.
15 pounds bigger, a bit better conditioning.
facts proven by real life.
you guys are looking up at a blue sky and trying to argue that it is pink.. ::)
-
::) AMIDOINGITRITE?
-
The only thing the pics prove is that in YOUR OPINION 99 was his best
no, ronnie's opinion too:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
he makes it very clear he felt he was better in 99 than in 98.
oh, and there is this other small thing: pics and vids prove what he said.
can't win this one, can you?
-
no, ronnie's opinion too:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
can't win this one, can you?
ND will be here shortly his scanners are down at the moment.
-
ND will be here shortly his scanners are down at the moment.
they don't have scanners at the flower shop.
-
yes, ronnie himself:
didn't you read his 99 victory seminar that I posted.
he states quite clearly he was better in 99 than in 98.
15 pounds bigger, a bit better conditioning.
facts proven by real life.
you guys are looking up at a blue sky and trying to argue that it is pink.. ::)
So how is that more credible than the three instances where he states 98 was better? He was clearly heavier in 99 and fuller imo, but from what I have seen, he was drier in 98.
-
So how is that more credible than the three instances where he states 98 was better?
because the pics and videos corroborate that he was better in 99 as he said.
they do not corroborate what he said the other three times.
in fact, they disprove it.
this isn't hard folks.. :-\
-
because the pics and videos corroborate that he was better in 99 as he said.
they do not corroborate what he said the other three times.
in fact, they disprove it.
this isn't hard folks.. :-\
Hulkster just to lighten things up is Ronnie coming back? Seems I saw some guest posing pics awhile back he seemed in better shape vs being fat ass hell.
-
Here are some pics of 98...he is very dry. Here is the 98 Mr. O comparisons.
(KL or CC should have been 2nd IMO)
-
because the pics and videos corroborate that he was better in 99 as he said.
they do not corroborate what he said the other three times.
in fact, they disprove it.
this isn't hard folks.. :-\
Don't you understand that your opinion of the pics may be different than that of others...it's subjective. Moreover, how can your opinion of pics be more credible than all of the experts and pros that state 98 or 01 was his best when they saw him in person all 3 years?
It's clear that you think 99 was his best; however, don't be so ignorant as to claim that others are "wrong" for disagreeing, especially when so many do (including Ronnie).
-
yes, ronnie himself:
didn't you read his 99 victory seminar that I posted.
he states quite clearly he was better in 99 than in 98.
15 pounds bigger, a bit better conditioning.
facts proven by real life.
you guys are looking up at a blue sky and trying to argue that it is pink.. ::)
You're really too retarded, you still don't get it. EVERY competitor says EVERY single year "That's the best I've ever been", you think he says at the 99 Olympia seminar "I was better last year"?? ::)
After a few years in retrospective, when the dust has settled, you can take the assesments of a competitor regarding his own physique for serious, but nto as long as they're still active.
-
Dear God, look at this gyno! It's too bad, because he looks flawless otherwise.
-
Some more pics from 98 . . .
-
he did?
you mean he actually showed footage and pics of him being better in 98 than in 99?
I missed that.
::)
ronnie's opinon was right the first time. and its proved by real life.
sorry if you feel otherwise.
::)
Its right the 1st time, why becuase it fits your agenda? Not the oh, I dunno, 3 fucking times he states otherwise later? You might get away with arguing 1 time.. but not 3.
Im pretty sure he knows himself and what happened better than you did.
Lets see, its a proven fact that all bodybuilders say they look their best the day fo the show. So then afterwards, when they look back on their career they can objectively say what their best performance was. Gee, guess what? He feels that 98 was his best showing. Ouch Hulkster.. thats gotta suck.
-
Some 2001 shots of Ronnie.
-
don't you fucking know how to read?:
::)
Never said it was fake stupid , we all know you have sever comprehension skills but stop trying to act like everyone's claiming it's fake and the irony of you of all people claiming that
-
no, ronnie's opinion too:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
he makes it very clear he felt he was better in 99 than in 98.
oh, and there is this other small thing: pics and vids prove what he said.
can't win this one, can you?
Right but 3 other times he said 98 was better. Again it's an opinion. And obviously you agree that everything is just an opinion as you don't agree with Ronnie when he said 3 times 98 is better. You honestly think he hasn't looked at pics and vids of both shows? Get off it Hulky girl. You think 99, Ronnie goes back and forth between 98 and 99 and, some say 01. It's all an opinion and there is no right answer. Pics can be interpreted differently by alot of people. So go back to jerking off to your 99 Ronnie pics.
-
Look at that fuckin arm/sholder-tie-in. Not from this world, maybe from another. :P
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360504;image)
-
LOL changed his mind?
more like forgot how good he looked.
as mentioned above, everyone has fond memories of their first time.
and so what if he changed his mind? does that mean just because he THINKS he was better in 98 that he actually WAS?
fuck no.
guess what?:
the video tape and pics don't change over time:
99>>>>>98:
and it shows EVERY time.
deal with it losers:
:P
meltdown because Ronnie said now on 3 occasions 1998 is his best LOL
I love when you meltdown you little troll
-
Look at that fuckin arm/sholder-tie-in. Not from this world, maybe from another. :P
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360504;image)
Yeah, probably the best MM shot ever imo. The dryness in his chest is outstanding as well. Remember though he really wasn't that good in 01 and all of the hype was simply because it was a Mr. O competing in the Arnold (per Hulkster ;D)
-
You love what? That your getting fucking raped by your hero? Your an idiot.
Ronnie says 98 was his best 3 time, all AFTER he said 99 was better than 98. So that means, guess what genius,... HE CHANGED HIS MIND!!!! He looked back through history and objectively said, "OK, 98 was my best ever" His previous quote was rendered invalid
Everyone always says "this is my best conditioning ever" on the day of the show Lol. Now your proving beyond the shadow of a doubt how incapable of grasping basic logic you are. And as far as sad... stop projecting on him, you the one that looks sad. ND is not the one having his point nullified by the person he's arguing for. Fucking LOL ;D
This is what happens every single time Hulkster gets proven dead wrong , he melts down in grand fashion and claiming everyone is sad , and stupid and wrong when in fact he is , the kid is the biggest loser on here.
He's wrong and proven wrong by his own hero yet again.
-
What's funny is that Hulkster has even been owned by Neo on the topic of what year was Ronnie's best conditioning. Sad, really.
-
Its right the 1st time, why becuase it fits your agenda? Not the oh, I dunno, 3 fucking times he states otherwise later? You might get away with arguing 1 time.. but not 3.
Im pretty sure he knows himself and what happened better than you did.
Lets see, its a proven fact that all bodybuilders say they look their best the day fo the show. So then afterwards, when they look back on their career they can objectively say what their best performance was. Gee, guess what? He feels that 98 was his best showing. Ouch Hulkster.. thats gotta suck.
Hulkster a sore loser , he lost every point he ever made. He's getting his ass kicked in yet another thread proven dead wrong and it kills him. He thinks by sticking to his stupidity it makes him look better and it doesn't it only make him look even more dumb than he is if that's even possible
Not only did Ronnie say his best was 1998 three times , so did Phil Heath , so did Troy Alves , so did Joe Weider , so did Shawn Perine etc but all of them are wrong and Hulkster is right ::) he's moved beyond being taken seriously and now just ridiculed for being the moron he is.
-
how I am getting 'proved wrong' when I not only have all the evidence on my side, but also Ronnie's own words that 99>98?
explain.
this oughta be good.
::)
-
how I am getting 'proved wrong' when I not only have all the evidence on my side, but also Ronnie's own words that 99>98?
explain.
this oughta be good.
::)
You're really too retarded, you still don't get it. EVERY competitor says EVERY single year "That's the best I've ever been", you think he says at the 99 Olympia seminar "I was better last year"??
After a few years in retrospective, when the dust has settled, you can take the assesments of a competitor regarding his own physique for serious, but nto as long as they're still active.
-
Its right the 1st time, why becuase it fits your agenda?
no, because pics and videos prove that he was right the first time.
-
how I am getting 'proved wrong' when I not only have all the evidence on my side, but also Ronnie's own words that 99>98?
explain.
this oughta be good.
::)
Proven DEAD wrong you committed to this notion 1999 was better and have been proven dead wrong. You have a long history of making ignorant statements and being proven flat-out wrong. you are bar far among the dumbest people on this board
you have your explanation you don't like it as usual because you're wrong now you think you can post your way out of your embarrassment and you can't
once again Ronnie Coleman owns you.
-
Yeah, probably the best MM shot ever imo. The dryness in his chest is outstanding as well. Remember though he really wasn't that good in 01 and all of the hype was simply because it was a Mr. O competing in the Arnold (per Hulkster ;D)
note that he was just as dry in 99 only 12-15 pounds bigger.
nuthuggers OWNED for the 4 billionth time.
this is just so damn easy! :P
-
no, because pics and videos prove that he was right the first time.
What pics and videos? And how do they prove this? This oughta be good ::)
-
Idiot thinks if he keeps posting the same shit he somehow becomes right ::) the old adage applies of you type a lie enough times it will eventually become the truth ::) but in this case he gets battered over the fucking head with facts each time.
-
note that he was just as dry in 99 only 12-15 pounds bigger.
nuthuggers OWNED for the 4 billionth time.
this is just so damn easy! :P
Oh yeah, those pics prove a lot....one is color and one is B&W. Let's base our opinions on that and then assert that the rest of virtually the entire bodybuilding community is wrong, you know, the judges, experts, fellow pros, etc. Seriously, Hulkster, take a step back and realize how moronic your arguments are becoming.
-
What pics and videos? And how do they prove this? This oughta be good ::)
oh, it will be.
enjoy melting down nuthuggers:
99> 2001 AC and also > 98.
http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027
and note the pics, and gut:
let the guy crying and whining and melting down commence.
countdown to EXCUSES!!!:
::)
-
ND is a funny girl. He's been exposed as a hypocrite several times but still ferociously defends his lover.
- he claimed that none of the experts say 03 was Ronnie's prime. The video and quotes from others say otherwise.
- quotes saying Ronnie has the best physique are 'subjective opinion' but when it comes to his best package, it becomes an 'unquestionable fact'
- when Ronnie says he was better in 99 than 98, he was 'biased' but when he pays respect to former champs, we're 'putting words in his mouth.'
i.e. ND will claw and spit like a girl, even making himself look foolish in the process, just to protect his man's honor. ::)
-
Oh yeah, those pics prove a lot....one is color and one is B&W. Let's base our opinions on that and then assert that the rest of virtually the entire bodybuilding community is wrong, you know, the judges, experts, fellow pros, etc. Seriously, Hulkster, take a step back and realize how moronic your arguments are becoming.
The best way to take care of trolls is not to feed them ;) let him meltdown in peace it's all he has left.
-
ND is a funny girl. He's been exposed as a hypocrite several times but still ferociously defends his lover.
- he claimed that none of the experts say 03 was Ronnie's prime. The video and quotes from others say otherwise.
- quotes saying Ronnie has the best physique are 'subjective opinion' but when it comes to his best package, it becomes an 'unquestionable fact'
- when Ronnie says he was better in 99 than 98, he was 'biased' but when he pays respect to former champs, we're 'putting words in his mouth.'
i.e. ND will claw and spit like a girl, even making himself look foolish in the process, just to protect his man's honor. ::)
well said.
-
oh, it will be.
enjoy melting down nuthuggers:
99> 2001 AC and also > 98.
http://www.truveo.com/Ronnie-Coleman-1999-Mr-Olympia-Part-Two/id/1160132027
and note the pics, and gut:
let the guy crying and whining and melting down commence.
countdown to EXCUSES!!!:
::)
No one has asserted anything about his gut in 01 vs. 99 -- stomach distention has nothing to do with dryness and conditioning, moron. His stomach was distented in 01; however, he looks much drier in the 01 FLS than the 99 FLS. Granted, the lighting is different and the pics are 2 years apart, but that's how it looks to me. This is why basing an opinion solely on pics is useless . . .
-
when Ronnie says he was better in 99 than 98, he was 'biased' but when he pays respect to former champs, we're 'putting words in his mouth.'
its really funny how ND loves to post quotes by ronnie that 98 was his best.
yet when we post a quote from Ronnie saying 99 was better than 98, ND meltsdown like a little bitch about how it is wrong, meaningless etc etc.
makes no sense, does it?
::)
-
Yes Ronnie can barely tie his shoes his IQ is low 70s ::) because he's not college educated ::) because he doesn't have a degree in accounting ::)
you have to forgive mind spine this is the same guy who took a phone call from aquilles and hear him say,,,,im natural and stole the 2k from getbiggers who actually are natural ::)
-
ND is a funny girl. He's been exposed as a hypocrite several times but still ferociously defends his lover.
- he claimed that none of the experts say 03 was Ronnie's prime. The video and quotes from others say otherwise.
- quotes saying Ronnie has the best physique are 'subjective opinion' but when it comes to his best package, it becomes an 'unquestionable fact'
- when Ronnie says he was better in 99 than 98, he was 'biased' but when he pays respect to former champs, we're 'putting words in his mouth.'
i.e. ND will claw and spit like a girl, even making himself look foolish in the process, just to protect his man's honor. ::)
`
You're in good company with this dummy it's no wonder the dumbest people on here flock to each other.
Again stupid who other than that guy with all the Nike gear on said 2003 was his prime? answer the question too don't evade it either , Troy Alves said 1998 , Phil Heath said 1998 and Ronnie said it , other than that skinny dude who said it was his best only because he was the biggest & freakiest who? answer the question too
don't quote me saying ' unquestionable fact ' show me where I typed that liar , I'll be waiting for that one too and good luck stupid.
When did I ever claim Ronnie was ' biased ' ? because he was better in 99 than 98? and you absolutely put words in his mouth
You're another textbook ignorant fan boy who I corrected on all your bullshit and like Hulkster you have nothing but to try and attack the messenger because you go your message corrected because you don't know how the game is played . You're a hypocrite and a moron
I'll be waiting Neo time to step up to the plate little man ;)
-
its really funny how ND loves to post quotes by ronnie that 98 was his best.
yet when we post a quote from Ronnie saying 99 was better than 98, ND meltsdown like a little bitch about how it is wrong, meaningless etc etc.
makes no sense, does it?
::)
Yeah because one quote after the contest trumps 3 after the fact saying clearly 1998 is better and look who is once again calling Ronnie wrong , you ;) shall I wait again for you to call him a liar? and he lies all the time? but not in the first quote HAHAHAHAHAHA you and Neo and the dumbest people on here two very stupid hypocrites
-
First, I didn't disagree with Peter McGough's claim that Ronnie was never harder or drier than Dorian.
again your quote
I'm sorry but Peter McGough is an idiot if he thinks 01 ASC Ronnie never surpassed Dorian's conditioning.
Neo the hypocrite , pot calling the kettle black ;D
When Ronnie says Dorian is better Neo claims " you ever hear the guy speak he's not the brightest guy " more pot calling the kettle black , Neo you're not that bright yourself there little man ;D
time for another meltdown internet-challenge little man?
Internet challenge
ah well, I'm off to the gym. I'll let ND and Mr.1derful continue posting in my absence. Who knows... maybe I'll compete in the next Mr. Getbig. I've put on a lot of size and worked on my weaknesses since Mr. Getbig 2. I would encourage ND to enter since he claims he's bigger than me but I know he'll just come up with an excuse to pussy out
can't beat me on an intellectual level you think you'd have better luck elsewhere LMFAO
-
Hulkster actually believed all those sharpened 99 screencaps lol real life evidence is from the guy who is in question and what does he say?
1998 destroys 1999 ;D
Except for the gyno ND. Except for the gyno.
-
Except for the gyno ND. Except for the gyno.
Maybe that's why 2001 is considered his best same package as 98 with no bitch tits
-
Neo seeing you were to scared to answer me before I'll ask again
Joe Weider - IFBB Co-Founder
"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."
Where is 2003?
Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer
"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"
Where is 2003?
Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49
"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2009
Tales from Columbus
2001 (2): Is Chris Cormier unlucky? Are Bob Cicherillo's threads so loud that he's being sponsored by a megaphone company? At the 2001 Arnold Classic, for the only time in its history, the reigning Mr. Olympia entered the contest. Not only that, but said Mr. Olympia, Ronnie Coleman, was in the best shape of his career, before or since. Now that is bad luck.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2008
2001 Then-reigning Mr. Olympia Ronnie Coleman, in the shape of his life at 245 pounds, took this one, with Cormier gaining the second of his six consecutive runner-up positions.
Where is 2003?
Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot
Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.
I had guys in front of me who had beaten me for the last ten years or so. Nobody picked me to go in and win that show because I had gotten ninth the year before. I had to come with an incredible package and blow all the judges away and that's what I pretty much did.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine August 2003
Jim Schmatltz on Ronnie chances of winning six Olympias in a row
if he repeats his 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic form, he'll experience the joy of six.
Where is 2003?
Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004
As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.
Where is 2003?
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian.
Where is 2003?
Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005
Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.
Where is 2003?
Couple these with the quote from Ronnie ( again ) himself , Heath , and Alves , now answer the question little man who other than the skinny guy in the video is claiming 2003 is his best showing ever? How does it have feel being owned by many of your own quotes ;)
Hulkster can stick 1999 up his ass and you can stick 2003 up yours and be happy because neither is his best for reasons I already explained ad nausem
-
LMAO @ ND not knowing the difference between quoting and paraphrasing, and only posting 01 ASC quotes asking me to point out where it says 2003.
Tony Doherty - http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=270388.msg3803035#msg3803035
"Absolutely no question. The best ever, I have seen them and worked with them all. Seeing Ronnie in 2003 was like looking into the future!"
Steve Blechman - MD, Febrary 2004
"Ronnie perseveres and proves continually that, at his best, he is unbeatable."
Hollis Liebman - Former Fitness Editor and IFBB Official
"The era of the big man would commence with Lee Haney (1984-1991), whose formidable torso would dominate the lineup for 8 straight years and was then elevated by Dorian Yates (1992-1997), whose back and overall conditioning upped the ante yet again until an alien named Ronnie Coleman (1998-2005), in all likelihood the greatest bodybuilder of all time, would redefine the sport bringing a near 300 pound contest ready physique to the stage."
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=238675.0
Flex Wheeler - MD, February 2004
"I'll go on record as saying Ronnie is truly the biggest, hardest, most shredded Mr. Olympia in history. No disrespect to anybody at all, but I'd to identify Ronnie Coleman as the greatest Mr. Olympia of all time."
Paul Dillet - MD, February 2004
"Understand that if Ronnie walked away tomorrow, I do not think anyone can measure up to the standards he has set. Just like Sergio Oliva, an awesome bodybuilder way ahead of his time, and like Flex Wheeler, who had an absolutely perfect, beautiful physique. No one will match Serigo or Flex and now Ronnie."
http://clips.team-andro.com/watch/6ec386cb64df22dff37b/Superstar-Seminar-Ronnie-Coleman-Phil-Heath-Dexter-Jackson
John Hansen, 2x Mr. Natural Universe and Mr. Natural Olympia - Personal Website
"It would be safe to say that [Ronnie Coleman] presented a physique that has never been seen by the bodybuilding world ever before. Competing at an incredibly massive 287 pounds, Ronnie destroyed the competition with a physique that could not possibly be equaled."
Ryan Mackie - A Fan Perspective: My 2003 Olympia Experience (Hosted on Bodybuilding.com)
"Everyone could see that at 287 pounds this was Ronnie's night and that he was back on top of his game and furthermore bodybuilding had just seen the bar of excellence raised even further. Just like Dorian Yates did in 1993 when he set a new standard, Ronnie has now taken it even further leaving all his competitors wonder what they have to do to now catch Ronnie Coleman, let alone beat him."
-
Taken from the video - http://clips.team-andro.com/watch/6ec386cb64df22dff37b/Superstar-Seminar-Ronnie-Coleman-Phil-Heath-Dexter-Jackson
Phil Heath - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"98, yeah, was incredible but I remember sitting there buying PPV and watching that with my college friends and, literally, on the top of the damn chair, talking about "man, did you see that?" Did you just see what happened?"
"For me, 98 and 03 but 03 was retarded. Ask Jay. He'll tell you. Dude just came off a damn spaceship."
Joe McNeal - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"It's not a question - 03. He was the biggest, most freakiest thing that's ever walked onstage, bar none. Bar none! The greatest."
Bob Cicherello - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"Honest to God, it's the first time I ever recall to this day being in the audience - Ronnie walks out in 03 and people started laughing. And they didn't start laughing for any other reason other than it was like that "oh my god." He was so big, so dominating. Just the looks on their faces like Godzilla had just walked in there."
-
in before ND claims the people in the video never explicitly said 03 was Ronnie's prime. The question posed to them in the interview is "what was Ronnie's best condition ever?" Notice they are talking about 03 ;)
-
I think 03 was Ronnie's most dominating win. I was there and when the second he walked on stage the show was over. The amazing thing was that his waistline was in check and he didn't have much stomach distention. Obviously he wasn't quite as conditioned as he was in 98 or 01, but he was about 40 lbs heavier.
-
Taken from the video - http://clips.team-andro.com/watch/6ec386cb64df22dff37b/Superstar-Seminar-Ronnie-Coleman-Phil-Heath-Dexter-Jackson
Phil Heath - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"98, yeah, was incredible but I remember sitting there buying PPV and watching that with my college friends and, literally, on the top of the damn chair, talking about "man, did you see that?" Did you just see what happened?"
"For me, 98 and 03 but 03 was retarded. Ask Jay. He'll tell you. Dude just came off a damn spaceship."
Joe McNeal - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"It's not a question - 03. He was the biggest, most freakiest thing that's ever walked onstage, bar none. Bar none! The greatest."
Bob Cicherello - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"Honest to God, it's the first time I ever recall to this day being in the audience - Ronnie walks out in 03 and people started laughing. And they didn't start laughing for any other reason other than it was like that "oh my god." He was so big, so dominating. Just the looks on their faces like Godzilla had just walked in there."
And? Heath , Alves and Ronnie all said 1998 thanks for playing kid
-
in before ND claims they never explicitly said 03 was Ronnie's prime. The question posed to them in the interview is "what was Ronnie's best condition ever?"
Phil Heath said 1998 he referred to 2003 as just retarded , Troy Alves said 1998 , Dexter NEVER said a year
and again see the multitude of quotes above all referring to 1998 or 2001 , 2003 is NOT his best overall showing for a myriad of reasons , Freakiest and Biggest? absolutely , best ? NO
-
"For me, 98 and 03 but 03 was retarded. Ask Jay. He'll tell you. Dude just came off a damn spaceship."
LMAO ;D
-
I think 03 was Ronnie's most dominating win. I was there and when the second he walked on stage the show was over. The amazing thing was that his waistline was in check and he didn't have much stomach distention. Obviously he wasn't quite as conditioned as he was in 98 or 01, but he was about 40 lbs heavier.
Yep, all in check right thurr
(http://images.tmuscle.com/forum_images/1/0/1067899.1147951950454.ghgut.jpg)
-
LMAO @ ND not knowing the difference between quoting and paraphrasing, and only posting 01 ASC quotes asking me to point out where it says 2003.
Tony Doherty - http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=270388.msg3803035#msg3803035
"Absolutely no question. The best ever, I have seen them and worked with them all. Seeing Ronnie in 2003 was like looking into the future!"
Steve Blechman - MD, Febrary 2004
"Ronnie perseveres and proves continually that, at his best, he is unbeatable."
Hollis Liebman - Former Fitness Editor and IFBB Official
"The era of the big man would commence with Lee Haney (1984-1991), whose formidable torso would dominate the lineup for 8 straight years and was then elevated by Dorian Yates (1992-1997), whose back and overall conditioning upped the ante yet again until an alien named Ronnie Coleman (1998-2005), in all likelihood the greatest bodybuilder of all time, would redefine the sport bringing a near 300 pound contest ready physique to the stage."
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=238675.0
Flex Wheeler - MD, February 2004
"I'll go on record as saying Ronnie is truly the biggest, hardest, most shredded Mr. Olympia in history. No disrespect to anybody at all, but I'd to identify Ronnie Coleman as the greatest Mr. Olympia of all time."
Paul Dillet - MD, February 2004
"Understand that if Ronnie walked away tomorrow, I do not think anyone can measure up to the standards he has set. Just like Sergio Oliva, an awesome bodybuilder way ahead of his time, and like Flex Wheeler, who had an absolutely perfect, beautiful physique. No one will match Serigo or Flex and now Ronnie."
http://clips.team-andro.com/watch/6ec386cb64df22dff37b/Superstar-Seminar-Ronnie-Coleman-Phil-Heath-Dexter-Jackson
John Hansen, 2x Mr. Natural Universe and Mr. Natural Olympia - Personal Website
"It would be safe to say that [Ronnie Coleman] presented a physique that has never been seen by the bodybuilding world ever before. Competing at an incredibly massive 287 pounds, Ronnie destroyed the competition with a physique that could not possibly be equaled."
Ryan Mackie - A Fan Perspective: My 2003 Olympia Experience (Hosted on Bodybuilding.com)
"Everyone could see that at 287 pounds this was Ronnie's night and that he was back on top of his game and furthermore bodybuilding had just seen the bar of excellence raised even further. Just like Dorian Yates did in 1993 when he set a new standard, Ronnie has now taken it even further leaving all his competitors wonder what they have to do to now catch Ronnie Coleman, let alone beat him."
Again where does it say 2003 is his best showing ever? it doesn't 99% of those quotes are commenting on his performance at that years Olympia has shit to do with all his other showings
2003 isn't his career best and you know it , like Hulkster you're to stupid and proud to admit it , you're ion good company little man.
-
LOL @ ND's meltdown
-
Yep, all in check right thurr
(http://images.tmuscle.com/forum_images/1/0/1067899.1147951950454.ghgut.jpg)
That's Ronnie best showing according to our resident moron Neo ;D
-
That's Ronnie best showing according to our resident moron Neo ;D
It's evident that Huckster and Neo ride the short bus.
-
LOL @ ND's meltdown
Nothing as usual , hopelessly overmatched as usual... continue avoiding facts you're good at it ;)
-
It's evident that Huckster and Neo ride the short bus.
Both of them ironically are ignorant and proud that makes for a very bad combo. It's funny how both are so far off the mark
Neo called Ronnie stupid when he said Dorian is better and Hulkster called him a liar ;D but hey what else are they gonna say? their own hero crippled any argument they could come up with lmao
-
Yeah because one quote after the contest trumps 3 after the fact
yes it does.
immediately after the contest you have clear recollection of how you appeared.
years later, you don't.
this is simple people.
ND is just melting down because Ronnie has publicly stated 99 was better than 98 and ND can't stand this.
look at this ensuing meltdown. its hilarious.
-
yes it does.
immediately after the contest you have clear recollection of how you appeared.
years later, you don't.
this is simple people.
ND is just melting down because Ronnie has publicly stated 99 was better than 98 and ND can't stand this.
look at this ensuing meltdown. its hilarious.
And years after that, Ronnie reverted to saying 98 was in fact better, dimwit. Now back on the short bus you go.
-
yes it does.
immediately after the contest you have clear recollection of how you appeared.
years later, you don't.
this is simple people.
ND is just melting down because Ronnie has publicly stated 99 was better than 98 and ND can't stand this.
look at this ensuing meltdown. its hilarious.
thanks for proving me right once again...continue with your meltdown everyone knew it was coming
-
And years after that, Ronnie reverted to saying 98 was in fact better,
too bad the pics and vids show he was correct years ago..
owned.
-
too bad the pics and vids show he was correct years ago..
owned.
Yeah sure and Heath and Alves and Perine and Weider were all wrong to , the experts are always wrong and internet-fay boys with oversharpened imagines are right ....continue embarrassing yourself ( see that's spelled correctly too )
-
too bad the pics and vids show he was correct years ago..
owned.
WOW your blind love is amazing. Have you ever competed? I have and I guarantee you that you do not have any clear thoughts of how you look right after a show. You are tired, dehydrated, and not thinking clearly at all. With all the drugs running through your system (and I guarantee Ronnie is as big a gear user as they come) you don't think clearly at all. So you can look back at pics and come to the conclusion that 99 was his best but Ronnie can't go back and look at pics and say 98 was his best?? You are an idiot schmoe boy. But I will say you are right if you think 99 is his best. Oh and ND is right about 98 being his best and Neo is right about 03 being his best and if someone think 2000 was his best they are right. Do you know why schmoe? Because it's all just an opinion. Honestly Ronnie has an ugly physique regardless of the year. But in this sport its all opinions and none are wrong. That's why Joe Weider was nuts when he wanted bodybuilding in the Olympics. You can have an Olympic sport where they winner wins based on an opinion.
-
Yeah sure and Heath and Alves and Perine and Weider were all wrong to , the experts are always wrong and internet-fay boys with oversharpened imagines are right ....continue embarrassing yourself ( see that's spelled correctly too )
People are only right when their opinions coincide with Huckster's, otherwise they are wrong.
-
WOW your blind love is amazing. Have you ever competed?
I love how when people have lost an argument, and lost it badly, that they try and bring other factors into it that have NOTHING to do with the argument at hand, in a pathetic effort to make their opponent's position seem weaker.
one of the oldest tricks in the book.
and still just as wrong, fallicious and sad as it always has been..
::)
-
I love how when people have lost an argument, and lost it badly, that they try and bring other factors into it that have NOTHING to do with the argument at hand, in a pathetic effort to make their opponent's position seem weaker.
one of the oldest tricks in the book.
and still just as wrong, fallicious and sad as it always has been..
::)
That's not a word, Ace.
-
as a non caring and unbiased individual in this whole thing
it appears to me Ronnie believes he was better in 99 than in 98
outsiders point of view here
-
That's not a word, Ace.
I love when he tries to type big wordand fails lol
-
its really funny how ND loves to post quotes by ronnie that 98 was his best.
yet when we post a quote from Ronnie saying 99 was better than 98, ND meltsdown like a little bitch about how it is wrong, meaningless etc etc.
makes no sense, does it?
::)
It is meaningless because Ronnie said he was better in 98 than 99. Retard.
-
yes it does.
immediately after the contest you have clear recollection of how you appeared.
years later, you don't.
this is simple people.
ND is just melting down because Ronnie has publicly stated 99 was better than 98 and ND can't stand this.
look at this ensuing meltdown. its hilarious.
Nd is not the one writing in GIANT FONT because he's pissed his hero nullified his argument. Gotta suck to have him publicly state 3 times that 98 was better than 99. hahah!
Clear recollection my ass. No one is going to say," yeah, Im worse than last year". You cannot admit youre wrong and your so hard up for an argument that you're making shit up that goes against all logic and reason. Its gotta suck. Deep down inside you know your failing miserably. Ouch Hulkster, Ouch.
-
Nd is not the one writing in GIANT FONT because he's pissed his hero nullified his argument. Gotta suck to have him publicly state 3 times that 98 was better than 99. hahah!
Clear recollection my ass. No one is going to say," yeah, Im worse than last year". You cannot admit youre wrong and your so hard up for an argument that you're making shit up that goes against all logic and reason. Its gotta suck. Deep down inside you know your failing miserably. Ouch Hulkster, Ouch.
Great post! Hulkster isn't to smart so stupidty prevents him from seeing facts
-
I love how when people have lost an argument, and lost it badly, that they try and bring other factors into it that have NOTHING to do with the argument at hand, in a pathetic effort to make their opponent's position seem weaker.
one of the oldest tricks in the book.
and still just as wrong, fallicious and sad as it always has been..
::)
Actually schmoe my question is relavant. I asked if you have ever competed because you claimed that the day of the show is when people have the most clear view of how they look. So I asked if you ever competed because if you have then you never would of made that comment because you certainly are not the most clear headed at that moment. All you ever really see that day is what's wrong with your physique. You constantly pick yourself apart. It's only weeks or even months later that you see how you really looked that day. The sadest thing is you schmoe. Your obsession with Ronnie is just creepy.
-
Nd is not the one writing in GIANT FONT because he's pissed his hero nullified his argument. Gotta suck to have him publicly state 3 times that 98 was better than 99. hahah!
Clear recollection my ass. No one is going to say," yeah, Im worse than last year". You cannot admit youre wrong and your so hard up for an argument that you're making shit up that goes against all logic and reason. Its gotta suck. Deep down inside you know your failing miserably. Ouch Hulkster, Ouch.
;D
-
I love how when people have lost an argument, and lost it badly, that they try and bring other factors into it that have NOTHING to do with the argument at hand, in a pathetic effort to make their opponent's position seem weaker.
one of the oldest tricks in the book.
and still just as wrong, fallicious and sad as it always has been..
::)
Lol@claiming you won because you have no other way to argue the point without sounding complete delusional. You are projecting, and something fierce. You think that by trying to claim victory, will shift the argument away from the fact Ronnie stated, not once, not twice, but THREE TIMES, that 98 was better than 99.. which is an integral part of you entire arguemtn. It hurts to have the person your arguing for completely wipe away for argument, huh Hulkster?
-
you won because you have no other way to argue the point
lets talk about arguing the point.
lets see:
I have ronnie's public opinion.
I have the pics and videos that prove what he said was right.
the nuthuggers have:
ronnie's contradictory opinion.
and pics and vids that prove that it is wrong.
yeah, great argument you have there. LMAO. ::)
-
Pics and videos are not dispositive, especially to discredit the opinions of those who were there in person. When will you understand this, Hulkster?
-
Lol@claiming you won because you have no other way to argue the point without sounding complete delusional. You are projecting, and something fierce. You think that by trying to claim victory, will shift the argument away from the fact Ronnie stated, not once, not twice, but THREE TIMES, that 98 was better than 99.. which is an integral part of you entire arguemtn. It hurts to have the person your arguing for completely wipe away for argument, huh Hulkster?
Look the kid is so badly owned what else can he say? Ronnie proved him wrong for the umteenth time, First Ronnie admits he couldn't beat Dorian not once not twice but three times this killed him , it killed him that Ronnie said Doeian had the thickest & freakiest back he ever seen , the Ronnie says 3 times 1998 was his best ! He's wrong about everything as usual and soundly defeated by his own hero
Look what hes become a bitter troll who laces every post with personal attacks , lies and enhanced pictures , he's crushed all he has left is denial. It isn't funny anymore :-\
-
lets talk about arguing the point.
lets see:
I have ronnie's public opinion.
I have the pics and videos that prove what he said was right.
the nuthuggers have:
ronnie's contradictory opinion.
and pics and vids that prove that it is wrong.
yeah, great argument you have there. LMAO. ::)
A. You DONT have Ronnies public opinion, and no matter how many times you lie, or how many mental gymnastics you do to try and convince yourself,0 it wont make it so. Fucking LOL. Your upset cause your in a corner, Ronnie said 3 times that YOUR opinion is incorrect to him. Technically you have the contradictory opinion, becuase the minority opinion. Only said once, not 3 times. And you werent at the contests, RONNIE was and he competed, that makes his opinion a little morevalid than yours. Your pics and vids mean nothing when Ronnie himself is telling you what his best is. Sorry, but you lose this one. OUCH, thats gotta hurt.
``
-
lets talk about arguing the point.
lets see:
I have ronnie's public opinion.
I have the pics and videos that prove what he said was right.
the nuthuggers have:
ronnie's contradictory opinion.
and pics and vids that prove that it is wrong.
yeah, great argument you have there. LMAO. ::)
Pics and vids only prove to you that he was better in 99. To other people that see them the pics and vids prove otherwise. Who is right? Everyone cuz the sport of bodybuilding is based on opinions. The criteria that the judges supposedly go by is VERY subjective. It's not like gymnastics or diving where you have to hit specific moves correctly. It's all opinions.
-
Pics and vids only prove to you that he was better in 99. To other people that see them the pics and vids prove otherwise. Who is right? Everyone cuz the sport of bodybuilding is based on opinions. The criteria that the judges supposedly go by is VERY subjective. It's not like gymnastics or diving where you have to hit specific moves correctly. It's all opinions.
youre not gonna convince him of shit. To him opinion is fact.
-
You DONT have Ronnies public opinion, and no matter how many times you lie
lie?
I guess you missed his victory seminar.
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
I did not.
. I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year.
aren't you glad I am here to educate you?
-
lie?
I guess you missed his victory seminar.
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
I did not.
aren't you glad I am here to educate you?
And I'm here to educate you on what an opinion is.
-
youre not gonna convince him of shit. To him opinion is fact.
no. the camera is fact. especially when people like Peter McGough who were AT THE CONTEST agree.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
even Peter McGough feels 98 was better than 99.
how are you going to get around this nuthuggers after arguing that pics and vids mean nothing and that only people who were there matter?
you had better tell this to your friend Peter!
hahahahahahahaha
its so easy to own stupid people :P :P :P :P.
-
Pics and videos are not dispositive, especially to discredit the opinions of those who were there in person. When will you understand this, Hulkster?
when you understand that Peter McGough feels 99 was better than 98. and 2003 for that matter.
Peter believes Ronnie's 99 form was better than all these, and all forms of dorian as well, as he feels 99 'advanced the sport' as far as Mr. Olympia appearences go.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
enjoy LOL
-
no. the camera is fact. especially when people like Peter McGough who were AT THE CONTEST agree.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
even Peter McGough feels 98 was better than 99.
how are you going to get around this nuthuggers after arguing that pics and vids mean nothing and that only people who were there matter?
you had better tell this to your friend Peter!
hahahahahahahaha
its so easy to own stupid people :P :P :P :P.
Your right, Mcgough does feel 98 was better than 99. LOL
And Ronnie agrees with him, 3 times, that 98 was better than 99. Thats gotta suck.
-
no. the camera is fact. especially when people like Peter McGough who were AT THE CONTEST agree.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
even Peter McGough feels 98 was better than 99.
how are you going to get around this nuthuggers after arguing that pics and vids mean nothing and that only people who were there matter?
you had better tell this to your friend Peter!
hahahahahahahaha
its so easy to own stupid people :P :P :P :P.
The best part is you were trying earlier to argue against Ronnie what his best showing was. Can you say fucking retarded? Fucking LOL!!!
-
no. the camera is fact. especially when people like Peter McGough who were AT THE CONTEST agree.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
even Peter McGough feels 98 was better than 99.
how are you going to get around this nuthuggers after arguing that pics and vids mean nothing and that only people who were there matter?
you had better tell this to your friend Peter!
hahahahahahahaha
its so easy to own stupid people :P :P :P :P.
No the camera isn't FACT! Guess what? Being there isn't FACT either. It's an opinion no matter how you try to spin it. 1000 people can see a pic of Ronnie and say wow he's got a great physique. That's their opinion only. When I see Ronnie I see an ugly physique that is just a mix bag of big body parts (except calves) and some of the worst abs in bodybuilding. That's MY opinion and I've seen pics, vids and seen him in person on stage.
-
when you understand that Peter McGough feels 99 was better than 98. and 2003 for that matter.
Peter believes Ronnie's 99 form was better than all these, and all forms of dorian as well, as he feels 99 'advanced the sport' as far as Mr. Olympia appearences go.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
enjoy LOL
You really are that stupid , Peter id now correct when you need him to be and I'm sure you agree with him when he specifically states Ronnie wad not as hard or as dry in 99 as he was in 98 ;) see you're constant state of hypocrisy where one minute Perer is right and thr next he's wrong
Peter is only right when you think he agrees with you and when he doesn't he's wrong and blind and biased because he's a Brit , I'm sure you agree with Peter when he says Ronnie was never harder or drier than Dorian ;)
And No where did Peter say Ronnie was way more advanced than Dorian in fact dummy he prefaces the whole convo by saying it's impossible to choose who is best ! But you being desperate and retarded you're trying to speak for him !
-
The best part is you were trying earlier to argue against Ronnie what his best showing was. Can you say fucking retarded? Fucking LOL!!!
LMFAO Hulkster in among the dumbest people online
-
LMFAO Hulkster in among the dumbest people online
Which when you think about it, is really saying something.
-
when you understand that Peter McGough feels 99 was better than 98. and 2003 for that matter.
Peter believes Ronnie's 99 form was better than all these, and all forms of dorian as well, as he feels 99 'advanced the sport' as far as Mr. Olympia appearences go.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_23/ai_n15346614/
enjoy LOL
nowhere on the entire fucking article, is there a mention of ronnie 99 best anything.
on that article, PM noted his top olypmians which include 68 olivia, 74 arnold, 77 zane, 84 haney, 93 yates and 99 ronie.
below is the only mention of ronnie:
"Ronnie Coleman | 1999
In his first defense of the Mr. O title, Coleman exhibited size, condition and sinew-splitting fullness he lacked a year earlier. At 257 pounds, he was so separated that he looked like a walking anatomy chart. That being said, I still think he achieved his best-ever physique for the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic."
where does PM state that 99 is the best and better than yates?
OWNED!
again - NO MENTION OF RONNIE IN 99 BEST EVER. NO METION
-
LOL you people are so stupid my posts went right over your empty heads.
let me explain this slowly for your simple minds:
in case you didn't notice, nuthuggers like ND love to push how experts who were and their opinions are all that matters -hence your rejection of all the visual evidence..
so I showed that ND's lord and savior Peter McGough also feels that 99>98
contrary to what you morons have been preaching for the last 6 pages.
understand the irony now?
retards. ::)
whether or not I happen to agree with him has nothing to do with it.
I was simply pointing out that your own arguments fail you when they backfire.
but you all were too stupid to understand this.
::)
-
honestly, you people need to take a course in how to debate or something.
your skills are so lacking it is appalling.
I mean, stuff like what I just posted goes right over your heads.
its disappointing.
it would be a lot better if you actually had the intelligence to keep up with me. :P
-
LOL changed his mind?
more like forgot how good he looked.
as mentioned above, everyone has fond memories of their first time.
......
seriously, get a life dude.....as if you're the expert of what Ronnie himself thinks....now your questioning your own hero?.....lol
I'm not sure if you're at the creepy or deluded stage..........maybe both
-
LOL you people are so stupid my posts went right over your empty heads.
let me explain this slowly for your simple minds:
in case you didn't notice, nuthuggers like ND love to push how experts who were and their opinions are all that matters -hence your rejection of all the visual evidence..
so I showed that ND's lord and savior Peter McGough also feels that 99>98
contrary to what you morons have been preaching for the last 6 pages.
understand the irony now?
retards. ::)
whether or not I happen to agree with him has nothing to do with it.
I was simply pointing out that your own arguments fail you when they backfire.
but you all were too stupid to understand this.
::)
Now your just trying to shift the topic from the fact your hero said 98 was better than 99 himself.. and the fact that you claimed to know better than Ronnie who was there and competed himself.
FUCKING LOL.
-
You and Hulkster and the other nutt-huggers got destroyed what did Ronnie say? yeah I thought so and he trumps you and did you even listen to that? did you? Heath said he liked 1998 better and 2003 was just ' retarded ' , Troy Alves said he liked 1998 better the only one who said 2003 was his best bar-none was the guy who looked like he just walked out of Nike Town and he said because he was the biggest & freakiest and Dexter never gave an answer he said backstage when Ronnie got undressed he knew the contest was over
More examples of your comprehension problems and lets see what the ' experts say ' about Ronnie's best ;)
You're in real trouble here cos all you're revealing is that whilst lots of people prefer the look Ronnie had in '98, most people agree that 2003 was his most dominant.
This is a problem for you because you need to believe that in '97 when he came 9th and Dorian killed him, that Ronnie was somehow pretty much at or near his all time best already. However, this is simply not true.
-
You're in real trouble here cos all you're revealing is that whilst lots of people prefer the look Ronnie had in '98, most people agree that 2003 was his most dominant.
This is a problem for you because you need to believe that in '97 when he came 9th and Dorian killed him, that Ronnie was somehow pretty much at or near his all time best already. However, this is simply not true.
No morons like you are in real trouble especially considering Ronnie said three times already his best Olympia is 1998 and being more dominate has absolutely nothing do to with his best and 2003 isn't it, Dorian technically dominated in 1997 but he was far from his best
Where did Ronnie improve from 1997 to 1998? Conditioning , he already had the size and everything else the only area him improved on was density & dryness
-
nowhere on the entire fucking article, is there a mention of ronnie 99 best anything.
on that article, PM noted his top olypmians which include 68 olivia, 74 arnold, 77 zane, 84 haney, 93 yates and 99 ronie.
below is the only mention of ronnie:
"Ronnie Coleman | 1999
In his first defense of the Mr. O title, Coleman exhibited size, condition and sinew-splitting fullness he lacked a year earlier. At 257 pounds, he was so separated that he looked like a walking anatomy chart. That being said, I still think he achieved his best-ever physique for the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic."
where does PM state that 99 is the best and better than yates?
OWNED!
again - NO MENTION OF RONNIE IN 99 BEST EVER. NO METION
That's Hulkster and that's why he's among the dumbest people on the internet. He tries to draw his own conclusions because he has nothing as usual. Because McGough lists them him sequential order he somehow thinks it means Ronnie is better when in fact he states specifically it's
impossible to choose ' Zane is listed after Arnold does that mean he's better too? ::)
McGough proves Hulkster flat-out wrong again and says out-right 1999 isn't the best he's looked and that he was harder & drier in 1998 compared to 2001
I've asked him a million times and he can't ever answer the question if entertaining he was bigger in 99 at 257 pounds while maintaining the same type conditioning he had in 1998/2001 why is it no one who is credible feels it's his best showing , because his conditioning is NOT the same and it's old news Ronnie said multiple occasions his condtioning in 1998 was ' spot-on '
-
I've asked him a million times and he can't ever answer the question if entertaining he was bigger in 99 at 257 pounds while maintaining the same type conditioning he had in 1998/2001 why is it no one who is credible feels it's his best showing
LOL
I have given TONS of testimony from people saying 99 was his best ever.
in fact, entire threads worth from other boards.
but, because you can't admit I have answered and defeated your challenge, you say these opinions are not 'credible'
::)
fact is, ND, the only person who's opinion you would EVER find "credible", is your hero Peter McGough's..
that much is clearly obvious to anyone who knows your posts.
-
You're in real trouble here cos all you're revealing is that whilst lots of people prefer the look Ronnie had in '98, most people agree that 2003 was his most dominant.
ND is making a fool of himself by contradicting the video. It's quite clear the people in the interview are talking about 03 Ronnie when asked what Ronnie's best condition was. Only ND seems to have trouble understanding grammar.
Phil Heath - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"98, yeah, was incredible but I remember sitting there buying PPV and watching that with my college friends and, literally, on the top of the damn chair, talking about "man, did you see that?" Did you just see what happened?"
"For me, 98 and 03 but 03 was retarded. Ask Jay. He'll tell you. Dude just came off a damn spaceship."
Joe McNeal - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"It's not a question - 03. He was the biggest, most freakiest thing that's ever walked onstage, bar none. Bar none! The greatest."
Bob Cicherello - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"Honest to God, it's the first time I ever recall to this day being in the audience - Ronnie walks out in 03 and people started laughing. And they didn't start laughing for any other reason other than it was like that "oh my god." He was so big, so dominating. Just the looks on their faces like Godzilla had just walked in there."
-
fact is, ND, the only person who's opinion you would EVER find "credible", is your hero Peter McGough's..
and even if Peter did say ronnie's 99 form was his best, you would find a way to discredit him and ignore it,
just like you have with this comments about Ronnie's 2001 AC form being the best he has ever seen onstage.
::)
everyone knows your pathetic tricks. you can't fool anyone anymore.
-
Pete Grymkowski he had tremendous shoulders, ND may have some pics in the back room.
-
Neo the only fools are you and Hulkster
again moron Alves, Heath , and Ronnie say 1998 and did you miss the part where I posted all the quotes from 2001? Yeah I thought so dummy
You and Hulkster proven wrong as usual
-
Peter never once claimed 99 was his best in fact 99% of legimate experts don't or 03 , Ronnie said 98 was his best three times now and you dummies called him a liar and stupid so spare me the plea of trying to dicredit someone
And more lies from you, I never tried to discredit the 2001 quote you idiot I was the one that first posted it LMFAO and you tried to discredit Peter when he said he doesn't think Ronnie at his best would beat Dorian , you tried to discredit Ronnie and every other expert hahaha it's what you do it's all you have
-
Ronnie said 98 was his best three times now and you dummies called him a liar
ND, now look, I know you work at a flowershop and such have had a tough time intellectually in life, but when oh when are you going to learn the difference between calling someone a 'liar' (as you often say I do) and saying that the person's opinion is wrong.
as these are two different things.
lying implies deception. eg. if Peter knew that 2001 was really his best and totally belived it, but claimed 99 was anyway for some alterior motive, then he would be a "liar"
me not agreeing with his opinion does not mean I am calling him a "liar" as you often say.
it just means I do not agree with his particular stance.
doesn't mean I think he is 'lying'
any other life lessons you need to be taught?
::)
-
Neo the only fools are you and Hulkster
again moron Alves, Heath , and Ronnie say 1998 and did you miss the part where I posted all the quotes from 2001? Yeah I thought so dummy
wrong, Heath said 03. Learn English ya idiot. "But" is a grammatical conjunction that indicates a contrast or exception.
He starts off saying 98 was great but then follows it up by saying 03 was better.
You and Hulkster proven wrong as usual
lol, how was I proven wrong? I refuted your claim that none of the experts said 03 was Ronnie's prime.
Phil Heath - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"98, yeah, was incredible but I remember sitting there buying PPV and watching that with my college friends and, literally, on the top of the damn chair, talking about "man, did you see that?" Did you just see what happened?"
"For me, 98 and 03 but 03 was retarded. Ask Jay. He'll tell you. Dude just came off a damn spaceship."
Joe McNeal - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"It's not a question - 03. He was the biggest, most freakiest thing that's ever walked onstage, bar none. Bar none! The greatest."
Bob Cicherello - Dexter Jackson Classic Superstar Seminar
"Honest to God, it's the first time I ever recall to this day being in the audience - Ronnie walks out in 03 and people started laughing. And they didn't start laughing for any other reason other than it was like that "oh my god." He was so big, so dominating. Just the looks on their faces like Godzilla had just walked in there."
Tony Doherty - http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=270388.msg3803035#msg3803035
"Absolutely no question. The best ever, I have seen them and worked with them all. Seeing Ronnie in 2003 was like looking into the future!"
Steve Blechman - MD, Febrary 2004
"Ronnie perseveres and proves continually that, at his best, he is unbeatable."
Hollis Liebman - Former Fitness Editor and IFBB Official
"The era of the big man would commence with Lee Haney (1984-1991), whose formidable torso would dominate the lineup for 8 straight years and was then elevated by Dorian Yates (1992-1997), whose back and overall conditioning upped the ante yet again until an alien named Ronnie Coleman (1998-2005), in all likelihood the greatest bodybuilder of all time, would redefine the sport bringing a near 300 pound contest ready physique to the stage."
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=238675.0
Flex Wheeler - MD, February 2004
"I'll go on record as saying Ronnie is truly the biggest, hardest, most shredded Mr. Olympia in history. No disrespect to anybody at all, but I'd to identify Ronnie Coleman as the greatest Mr. Olympia of all time."
Paul Dillet - MD, February 2004
"Understand that if Ronnie walked away tomorrow, I do not think anyone can measure up to the standards he has set. Just like Sergio Oliva, an awesome bodybuilder way ahead of his time, and like Flex Wheeler, who had an absolutely perfect, beautiful physique. No one will match Serigo or Flex and now Ronnie."
http://clips.team-andro.com/watch/6ec386cb64df22dff37b/Superstar-Seminar-Ronnie-Coleman-Phil-Heath-Dexter-Jackson
John Hansen, 2x Mr. Natural Universe and Mr. Natural Olympia - Personal Website
"It would be safe to say that [Ronnie Coleman] presented a physique that has never been seen by the bodybuilding world ever before. Competing at an incredibly massive 287 pounds, Ronnie destroyed the competition with a physique that could not possibly be equaled."
Ryan Mackie - A Fan Perspective: My 2003 Olympia Experience (Hosted on Bodybuilding.com)
"Everyone could see that at 287 pounds this was Ronnie's night and that he was back on top of his game and furthermore bodybuilding had just seen the bar of excellence raised even further. Just like Dorian Yates did in 1993 when he set a new standard, Ronnie has now taken it even further leaving all his competitors wonder what they have to do to now catch Ronnie Coleman, let alone beat him.
-
Neo go listen again moron! And those quotes idiot are from the 03 Olympia and have nothing to do with the topic at hand nicr try though and you're quoting Ryan Mackie lmfao that's an expert boy lmao
And what does Ronnie say? Owned lma
-
you're quoting Ryan Mackie lmfao that's an expert
like I said, ND only listens to Peter McGough..
::)
-
like I said, ND only listens to Peter McGough..
::)
Well, considering you won't even listen to RONNIE himself, I guess that makes ND open minded compared to you, eh?
Since, you know, Ronnie has made it quite clear on THREE SEPERATE OCCAISIONS 98 was his best showing, not 99... whoops!
-
like I said, ND only listens to Peter McGough..
::)
No I listen to Ronnie when he says Dorian wouldn't beat him on multiple occasions , I listen to Ronnie when he said he was at his best in 1998 THREE times , I listen to Ronnie when he says Dorian had the thickest & freakiest back he ever seen LMFAO
OWNED yet again you fucking idiot ;D
-
Well, considering you won't even listen to RONNIE himself, I guess that makes ND open minded compared to you, eh?
Since, you know, Ronnie has made it quite clear on THREE SEPERATE OCCAISIONS 98 was his best showing, not 99... whoops!
Hahahahahaha Hulkster constaly goes on about how stupid we are the kid can't spell for shit , he relies on the weakest of logic and he constantly owns himself , the kid is a moron he must be one of Sarah Paline's kids.
-
ND, now look, I know you work at a flowershop and such have had a tough time intellectually in life, but when oh when are you going to learn the difference between calling someone a 'liar' (as you often say I do) and saying that the person's opinion is wrong.
as these are two different things.
lying implies deception. eg. if Peter knew that 2001 was really his best and totally belived it, but claimed 99 was anyway for some alterior motive, then he would be a "liar"
me not agreeing with his opinion does not mean I am calling him a "liar" as you often say.
it just means I do not agree with his particular stance.
doesn't mean I think he is 'lying'
any other life lessons you need to be taught?
::)
What do you do? you just claim I worked at a flower shop which you know isn't true so you claim you're not lying LMFAO with a lie?
Only you can't be this insanely stupid. ;)
-
I listen to Ronnie when he said he was at his best in 1998
but you didn't listen to him when he stated he was better in 1999 than in 1998..
::)
you just pick and choose whatever fits your agenda.
you don't have any objectivity at all.. :-\
-
but you didn't listen to him when he stated he was better in 1999 than in 1998..
::)
you just pick and choose whatever fits your agenda.
you don't have any objectivity at all.. :-\
Again that original statement has been amended go learn what that word is dummy !
Three times since that statement he's been consistent , YOU called Ronnie a liar so now we can believe him? oppppssss Hulkster looking really stupid right now , according to you Ronnie lies about everything LMFAO how does it feel having your nose rubbed on your own shit? ;)
-
but you didn't listen to him when he stated he was better in 1999 than in 1998..
::)
you just pick and choose whatever fits your agenda.
you don't have any objectivity at all.. :-\
Your a fucking retard. He cant be right both times, you just contradicted yourself and showed that YOU only pick what fits your agenda. Ronnie 3 times AFTERWARDS said 98 was his best. 1 Time he said 99 was, and that was WHEN HE WON, which can all but be rendered null and void because every single BB says "This is my best conditioning ever" - or some variant of that directly after the show. They are never gonna say I was better last year. And you fucking no this but youre so stubborn you wont admit your wrong, now your looking like a bigger and bigger idiot. Fucking LOL.
-
Neo seeing you were to scared to answer me before I'll ask again
Joe Weider - IFBB Co-Founder
"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."
Where is 2003?
Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer
"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"
Where is 2003?
Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49
"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2009
Tales from Columbus
2001 (2): Is Chris Cormier unlucky? Are Bob Cicherillo's threads so loud that he's being sponsored by a megaphone company? At the 2001 Arnold Classic, for the only time in its history, the reigning Mr. Olympia entered the contest. Not only that, but said Mr. Olympia, Ronnie Coleman, was in the best shape of his career, before or since. Now that is bad luck.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2008
2001 Then-reigning Mr. Olympia Ronnie Coleman, in the shape of his life at 245 pounds, took this one, with Cormier gaining the second of his six consecutive runner-up positions.
Where is 2003?
Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot
Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.
I had guys in front of me who had beaten me for the last ten years or so. Nobody picked me to go in and win that show because I had gotten ninth the year before. I had to come with an incredible package and blow all the judges away and that's what I pretty much did.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine August 2003
Jim Schmatltz on Ronnie chances of winning six Olympias in a row
if he repeats his 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic form, he'll experience the joy of six.
Where is 2003?
Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004
As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.
Where is 2003?
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian.
Where is 2003?
Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005
Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.
Where is 2003?
Couple these with the quote from Ronnie ( again ) himself , Heath , and Alves , now answer the question little man who other than the skinny guy in the video is claiming 2003 is his best showing ever? How does it have feel being owned by many of your own quotes Wink
Hulkster can stick 1999 up his ass and you can stick 2003 up yours and be happy because neither is his best for reasons I already explained ad nausem
-
Your a fucking retard. He cant be right both times, you just contradicted yourself and showed that YOU only pick what fits your agenda. Ronnie 3 times AFTERWARDS said 98 was his best. 1 Time he said 99 was, and that was WHEN HE WON, which can all but be rendered null and void because every single BB says "This is my best conditioning ever" - or some variant of that directly after the show. They are never gonna say I was better last year. And you fucking no this but youre so stubborn you wont admit your wrong, now your looking like a bigger and bigger idiot. Fucking LOL.
He is hands down the dumbest fuck on this site even dumber than MattT he's the same complete moron who claimed Shawn Ray is a better bodybuilder than Lee Labrada despite the fact that out of the four times they meet Ray LOST three of them LMMFAO
Hulkster is the biggest dummy ever he claimed he went to college MY ASS if so they must have had a quota for special needs people
-
like I said, ND only listens to Peter McGough..
::)
I listen to these guys and BTW where the FUCK in 1999 and 2003?
Neo seeing you were to scared to answer me before I'll ask again
Joe Weider - IFBB Co-Founder
"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."
Where is 2003?
Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer
"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"
Where is 2003?
Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49
"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2009
Tales from Columbus
2001 (2): Is Chris Cormier unlucky? Are Bob Cicherillo's threads so loud that he's being sponsored by a megaphone company? At the 2001 Arnold Classic, for the only time in its history, the reigning Mr. Olympia entered the contest. Not only that, but said Mr. Olympia, Ronnie Coleman, was in the best shape of his career, before or since. Now that is bad luck.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2008
2001 Then-reigning Mr. Olympia Ronnie Coleman, in the shape of his life at 245 pounds, took this one, with Cormier gaining the second of his six consecutive runner-up positions.
Where is 2003?
Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot
Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.
I had guys in front of me who had beaten me for the last ten years or so. Nobody picked me to go in and win that show because I had gotten ninth the year before. I had to come with an incredible package and blow all the judges away and that's what I pretty much did.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine August 2003
Jim Schmatltz on Ronnie chances of winning six Olympias in a row
if he repeats his 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic form, he'll experience the joy of six.
Where is 2003?
Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004
As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.
Where is 2003?
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian.
Where is 2003?
Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005
Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.
Where is 2003?
Couple these with the quote from Ronnie ( again ) himself , Heath , and Alves , now answer the question little man who other than the skinny guy in the video is claiming 2003 is his best showing ever? How does it have feel being owned by many of your own quotes Wink
Hulkster can stick 1999 up his ass and you can stick 2003 up yours and be happy because neither is his best for reasons I already explained ad nausem
-
Your a fucking retard. He cant be right both times, you just contradicted yourself and showed that YOU only pick what fits your agenda
wrong.
I don't give a fuck what ronnie says. the guys says he was natural when he wasn't, says he was a cop when he wasn't, says he was never torn when he was.. etc.
I only post what he said about 99 being better than 98 to catch you morons in your own stupid trap.
because everyone knows that you morons only post quotes - hell, look at the last few posts from ND LOL ::)
almost no pics, almost no vids.
why? because they show you are WRONG.
-
wrong.
I don't give a fuck what ronnie says. the guys says he was natural when he wasn't, says he was a cop when he wasn't, says he was never torn when he was.. etc.
I only post what he said about 99 being better than 98 to catch you morons in your own stupid trap.
because everyone knows that you morons only post quotes - hell, look at the last few posts from ND LOL ::)
almost no pics, almost no vids.
why? because they show you are WRONG.
meltdown , you don't care about quotes because they fucking own your bullshit , you don't care about facts either , you don't care about looking like a fucking moron either ;)
thanks for playing stick 1999 up your ass because it isn't Ronnie's best
-
the irony of ND responding to the fact that all he does is posts quotes and listen to Peter McGough..with a quote from Peter McGough..
LMAO.
::)
this is all ND knows.
-
the irony of ND responding to the fact that all he does is posts quotes and listen to Peter McGough..with a quote from Peter McGough..
LMAO.
::)
this is all ND knows.
Miss these retard? thanks for playing , stop running from the question where is 1999? jackass?
Neo seeing you were to scared to answer me before I'll ask again
Joe Weider - IFBB Co-Founder
"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."
Where is 2003?
Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer
"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"
Where is 2003?
Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49
"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2009
Tales from Columbus
2001 (2): Is Chris Cormier unlucky? Are Bob Cicherillo's threads so loud that he's being sponsored by a megaphone company? At the 2001 Arnold Classic, for the only time in its history, the reigning Mr. Olympia entered the contest. Not only that, but said Mr. Olympia, Ronnie Coleman, was in the best shape of his career, before or since. Now that is bad luck.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2008
2001 Then-reigning Mr. Olympia Ronnie Coleman, in the shape of his life at 245 pounds, took this one, with Cormier gaining the second of his six consecutive runner-up positions.
Where is 2003?
Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot
Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.
I had guys in front of me who had beaten me for the last ten years or so. Nobody picked me to go in and win that show because I had gotten ninth the year before. I had to come with an incredible package and blow all the judges away and that's what I pretty much did.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine August 2003
Jim Schmatltz on Ronnie chances of winning six Olympias in a row
if he repeats his 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic form, he'll experience the joy of six.
Where is 2003?
Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004
As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.
Where is 2003?
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian.
Where is 2003?
Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005
Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.
Where is 2003?
Couple these with the quote from Ronnie ( again ) himself , Heath , and Alves , now answer the question little man who other than the skinny guy in the video is claiming 2003 is his best showing ever? How does it have feel being owned by many of your own quotes Wink
Hulkster can stick 1999 up his ass and you can stick 2003 up yours and be happy because neither is his best for reasons I already explained ad nausem
-
the irony of ND responding to the fact that all he does is posts quotes and listen to Peter McGough..with a quote from Peter McGough..
LMAO.
::)
this is all ND knows.
How about THREE quotes from Ronnie all saying 1998 > 1999> want I should post them again ? dumbass
-
post them all you want.
it doesn't mean they are correct. as real life clearly shows:
::)
-
To me he looks drier in 98 . . .
-
To me he looks drier in 98 . . .
absolutely look at the abdominals , look at the deltoids and the back as well
-
post them all you want.
it doesn't mean they are correct. as real life clearly shows:
::)
Real life? you looked at the pics and videos from the 1993 Mr Olympia and came to the epiphany Dorian lost LMMFAO you know shit and the facts own you
-
post them all you want.
it doesn't mean they are correct. as real life clearly shows:
::)
All I see is a drier 98 Ronnie vs a Bigger but slightly less conditioned 99 Ronnie.
-
wrong.
I don't give a fuck what ronnie says. the guys says he was natural when he wasn't, says he was a cop when he wasn't, says he was never torn when he was.. etc.
I only post what he said about 99 being better than 98 to catch you morons in your own stupid trap.
because everyone knows that you morons only post quotes - hell, look at the last few posts from ND LOL ::)
almost no pics, almost no vids.
why? because they show you are WRONG.
Dont give a fuck what the competitor himself claims as his best showing? Especially when its fairly well regarded by industry insiders to be his best showing?
Sorry failure, but your the odd man out here.
So youve basically taken to trying to discredit everyone else because it doesnt match your opinion? Lol. Yep everyone, Hulkster knows best, everyone is wrong but him, he doesnt give a fuck what anybody says, because his opinion on that video is all that matters. Give me a fucking break homo, everyone has seen all the pics and vids you constantly post, your opinion doesnt change reality.
-
Dont give a fuck what the competitor himself claims as his best showing?
not when he claims different things depending on his mood, no.
the video tape and camera are not subject to such changes of opinion.
something you nuthuggers have yet to learn..
-
Hulkster knows best
yes, that is the name of my next reality tv show focusing on how ronnie kicks dorian's ass. :-*
-
yes, that is the name of my next reality tv show focusing on how ronnie kicks dorian's ass. :-*
yeah like Flex did in 1993 ;). You see the opposite of reality and contradict it often
-
not when he claims different things depending on his mood, no.
the video tape and camera are not subject to such changes of opinion.
something you nuthuggers have yet to learn..
Lol. Depending on his mood would be if he repeatedly contradicted himself. he said 99 was better 1 time... to 3 times saying 98 was his best. ... derrr obviously he changed his mind and believes 98 was his best. Youre ability to do mental gymnastics to try and validify your opinions is astounding. You truely are sad.
-
Neo seeing you were to scared to answer me before I'll ask again
Joe Weider - IFBB Co-Founder
"Many experts, including reigning Mr.Olympia, Jay Cutler, believe that at his best Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. When looking at pictures of Ronnie from the 1998 Mr.Olympia, I find it hard to argue with that."
Where is 2003?
Raymond Cassar - Muscletime Editor and Photographer
"There is no one alive that can beat Ronnie Coleman when he is at his best - No One! (and his best for me was when he won the 2001 Arnold Classic)"
Where is 2003?
Team Flex - http://www.flexonline.com/training/49
"We've said before that the 245 pounds or so physique with which [Ronnie Coleman] won the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic is the best ever - unbeatable."
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2009
Tales from Columbus
2001 (2): Is Chris Cormier unlucky? Are Bob Cicherillo's threads so loud that he's being sponsored by a megaphone company? At the 2001 Arnold Classic, for the only time in its history, the reigning Mr. Olympia entered the contest. Not only that, but said Mr. Olympia, Ronnie Coleman, was in the best shape of his career, before or since. Now that is bad luck.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine March 2008
2001 Then-reigning Mr. Olympia Ronnie Coleman, in the shape of his life at 245 pounds, took this one, with Cormier gaining the second of his six consecutive runner-up positions.
Where is 2003?
Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot
Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.
I had guys in front of me who had beaten me for the last ten years or so. Nobody picked me to go in and win that show because I had gotten ninth the year before. I had to come with an incredible package and blow all the judges away and that's what I pretty much did.
Where is 2003?
Flex Magazine August 2003
Jim Schmatltz on Ronnie chances of winning six Olympias in a row
if he repeats his 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic form, he'll experience the joy of six.
Where is 2003?
Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004
As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.
Where is 2003?
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian.
Where is 2003?
Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005
Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.
Where is 2003?
Couple these with the quote from Ronnie ( again ) himself , Heath , and Alves , now answer the question little man who other than the skinny guy in the video is claiming 2003 is his best showing ever? How does it have feel being owned by many of your own quotes Wink
Hulkster can stick 1999 up his ass and you can stick 2003 up yours and be happy because neither is his best for reasons I already explained ad nausem
I agree with all those quotes that Ronnie had the greatest physique of all-time.
OWNED
-
not when he claims different things depending on his mood, no.
the video tape and camera are not subject to such changes of opinion.
something you nuthuggers have yet to learn..
Sorry pics show he is drier in 98 and better conditioned. 98 and 99 the only years he looked decent.
-
I agree with all those quotes that Ronnie had the greatest physique of all-time.
OWNED
One of the ugliest physiques of all time and one of the men credited with ruining bodybuilding.
-
I agree with all those quotes that Ronnie had the greatest physique of all-time.
OWNED
The only one who is owned is you for answering questions that wasn't asked. And I'm glad you agree with these guys who claim Ronnie had the best physique of all-time and it wasn't 2003 or 1999 ;)
See there is hope for idiots like you and seeing you agree he has the best physique of all-time I'm sure you know he's stated on multiple occasions now that he still couldn't beat Dorian so in the end it's you is owned by yout own hero
-
The only one who is owned is you for answering questions that wasn't asked. And I'm glad you agree with these guys who claim Ronnie had the best physique of all-time and it wasn't 2003 or 1999
on the contrary, the only one who is owned is you for posting quotes saying 98 or 01 ASC Ronnie is the greatest bodybuilder. Since you feel they are reliable sources to judge physiques, in this case Ronnie's prime, then you must also agree with their assessment that Ronnie has the best physique of all-time.
OWNED ;)
-
on the contrary, the only one who is owned is you for posting quotes saying 98 or 01 ASC Ronnie is the greatest bodybuilder. Since you feel they are reliable sources to judge physiques, in this case Ronnie's prime, then you must also agree with their assessment that Ronnie has the best physique of all-time.
OWNED ;)
Nope you're owned fan-boy first for running from the questioned asked ;) and second because none of them say 2003 ;) and third because Ronnie says even still he wouldn't beat Yates ;) 3 strikes fan-boys are out of luck as usual. ;D
And still having a hard time with subjective opinions huh? the ONLY thing those quotes prove is it's popular opinion that Ronnie had the best physique of all-time and 2003 isn't it ;)
-
No morons like you are in real trouble especially considering Ronnie said three times already his best Olympia is 1998 and being more dominate has absolutely nothing do to with his best and 2003 isn't it, Dorian technically dominated in 1997 but he was far from his best
Where did Ronnie improve from 1997 to 1998? Conditioning , he already had the size and everything else the only area him improved on was density & dryness
I guess dryness and density are important then. I would argue his back improved also. Nasser came a good second to Dorian in '97 and in '98 he came 3rd to a waterlogged and small Flex. I know Ronnie didn't beat Flex by much that year but Flex was the favourite and if you watch the video Ronnie's got muscle hanging off him with twice the thickness of the syntholater with faaar superior condition.
Anyway all this is by the by because 2003 Ronnie would beat 98 Ronnie, despite inferior aesthetics. Imagine Ronnie 2003 on that 98 stage or even 1993, he'd crush them all with his insanely powerful combo of size, shape and condition. Dorian is made of granite, but a 287lb Ronnie still beats him on aesthetics, shape, size/thickness, and although not as granite-like all over he has lines in his ass and hams that could swallow Dorian up.
Dorian was the king of mass in his day, front and back no one could match him. Just look at these vids of their respective bests and tell me Dorian looks as powerful once you've seen Ronnie '03
-
Nope you're owned fan-boy first for running from the questioned asked and second because none of them say 2003 and third because Ronnie says even still he wouldn't beat Yates 3 strikes fan-boys are out of luck as usual.
LOL @ ND not getting it
you argue that 98 ad 01 ASC were Ronnie's prime and post quotes saying Ronnie both years presented the best physique in history to corroborate this.
However, these quotes that deem 98 and 01 ASC to be Ronnie's best physique are 'unreliable' when it comes to judging best physique ever
does anyone else see the hypocrisy here?
These quotes are good enough to judge physiques when it suits ND but 'biased' and 'subjective opinion' when it disproves his argument. ::)
-
post them all you want.
it doesn't mean they are correct. as real life clearly shows:
::)
LOL That was a self-owning, he looks way sharper and grainier in the 98 pic. Look at the quads, zero vascularity in 99.
-
LOL @ ND not getting it
you argue that 98 ad 01 ASC were Ronnie's prime and post quotes saying Ronnie both years presented the best physique in history to corroborate this.
However, these quotes that deem 98 and 01 ASC to be Ronnie's best physique are 'unreliable' when it comes to judging best physique ever
does anyone else see the hypocrisy here?
These quotes are good enough to judge physiques when it suits ND but 'biased' and 'subjective opinion' when it disproves his argument. ::)
Ironic you type I'm not the one ' getting it ' I've asked you before to post the exact quote that you claim I made when you put something in quotations and you couldn't before so I will spot-light it again , please show me where I ever claimed they were ' unreliable ' please do and good luck you're gonna need it
The quotes aren't proof he had the best physique ever it's merely proof that is a popular opinion that he does and furthermore it's not the year you think it was which proves you don't know what you're talking about as usual
And you wanna talk about Hypocrisy? people who live in glass house Neo shouldn't be casting stones , You agree when McGough says 2001 is unbeatable ( by anyone on stage ) and then claim he's flat out wrong when he claims Ronnie was never harder or drier than Dorian , Hello Hypocrite much? you're not very bright Neo you can't keep track of your bullshit but I can and further more you're the moron who claimed if you believe one quote you then become bound to believe them ALL ! this is your retarded logic which I explained to you is faulty
You're a hypocrite and not a very bright one ontop of being wrong about 2003 , how does it feel to lose at every turn?
-
Ironic you type I'm not the one ' getting it ' I've asked you before to post the exact quote that you claim I made when you put something in quotations and you couldn't before so I will spot-light it again , please show me where I ever claimed they were ' unreliable ' please do and good luck you're gonna need it
The quotes aren't proof he had the best physique ever it's merely proof that is a popular opinion that he does and furthermore it's not the year you think it was which proves you don't know what you're talking about as usual
And you wanna talk about Hypocrisy? people who live in glass house Neo shouldn't be casting stones , You agree when McGough says 2001 is unbeatable ( by anyone on stage ) and then claim he's flat out wrong when he claims Ronnie was never harder or drier than Dorian , Hello Hypocrite much? you're not very bright Neo you can't keep track of your bullshit but I can and further more you're the moron who claimed if you believe one quote you then become bound to believe them ALL ! this is your retarded logic which I explained to you is faulty
You're a hypocrite and not a very bright one ontop of being wrong about 2003 , how does it feel to lose at every turn?
typical ND response: when exposed, change subjects ::)
do you concede those quotes are right about Ronnie having the best physique ever? Or are they wrong about which year was Ronnie's best physique?
-
I guess dryness and density are important then. I would argue his back improved also. Nasser came a good second to Dorian in '97 and in '98 he came 3rd to a waterlogged and small Flex. I know Ronnie didn't beat Flex by much that year but Flex was the favourite and if you watch the video Ronnie's got muscle hanging off him with twice the thickness of the syntholater with faaar superior condition.
Anyway all this is by the by because 2003 Ronnie would beat 98 Ronnie, despite inferior aesthetics. Imagine Ronnie 2003 on that 98 stage or even 1993, he'd crush them all with his insanely powerful combo of size, shape and condition. Dorian is made of granite, but a 287lb Ronnie still beats him on aesthetics, shape, size/thickness, and although not as granite-like all over he has lines in his ass and hams that could swallow Dorian up.
Dorian was the king of mass in his day, front and back no one could match him. Just look at these vids of their respective bests and tell me Dorian looks as powerful once you've seen Ronnie '03
I guess dryness and density are important then. I would argue his back improved also. Nasser came a good second to Dorian in '97 and in '98 he came 3rd to a waterlogged and small Flex. I know Ronnie didn't beat Flex by much that year but Flex was the favourite and if you watch the video Ronnie's got muscle hanging off him with twice the thickness of the syntholater with faaar superior condition.
density & dryness win and lose contests and many claim Ronnie won 1998 because his glutes & hams where more dry and separated ( density & dryness ) , Ronnie's conditioning that day was unmatched again until 2001
Anyway all this is by the by because 2003 Ronnie would beat 98 Ronnie, despite inferior aesthetics. Imagine Ronnie 2003 on that 98 stage or even 1993, he'd crush them all with his insanely powerful combo of size, shape and condition. Dorian is made of granite, but a 287lb Ronnie still beats him on aesthetics, shape, size/thickness, and although not as granite-like all over he has lines in his ass and hams that could swallow Dorian up.
I doubt 2003 would beat 1998 maybe , I doubt it. Maybe Ronnie would beat Dorian from the 1993 Olympia but again maybe not , maybe on size alone he would win , but I think Dorian from the black & white photoshoot at 269 pounds would beat any version of Ronnie because he wouldn't be dwarfed by 03 and would have better conditioning and balance and he would dwarf a 249 pound Ronnie with the same advantages already mentioned
I know a lot of people feel 2003 is his best and it simply isn't because his density & dryness pale in comparison to 98/01 as does his balance & proportion which is exactly why a majority of experts feel those showings are his best and may be the best ever
Dumb Neo posted a quote from Shawn Ray which states the obvious he won that show on pure size and nothing more his conditioning for that size was very good for that weight and here is another quote which touches on what I'm talking about
Wayne Demilla " I've said to Ronnie , " What you've got to realize is that in 98-99 you were probably in the best proportion you could be for your frame . Those muscles have gotten bigger. Just cos you're bigger , doesn't make you better . "
which lends credence that his density & dryness and balance & proportion progressively got worse when he became heavier which McGough mentions as well
Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001
RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .
I mean it's stating the obvious well to some of us ;D
-
typical ND response: when exposed, change subjects ::)
do you concede those quotes are right about Ronnie having the best physique ever? Or are they wrong about which year was Ronnie's best physique?
Hahahahahahahaha epic , epic projection Neo , in fact the original claim was ' where is 2003 ' which you most certainly did NOT stick to the topic at hand because as usual when you're owned you stop responding or try to change the topic ! you avoided those quotes for two posts and your response was I agree with all those quotes that Ronnie had the greatest physique of all-time.
OWNED NOT the question I asked ;) Neo you have to be a tad more sophisticated than that you run on my level kid ;)
You don't answer a question with a question kid , you want me to answer your question go back and answer all mine and try to stick to the topic this time ;)
-
LOL That was a self-owning, he looks way sharper and grainier in the 98 pic. Look at the quads, zero vascularity in 99.
yeah, look at the quads in 99.. LOL
::)
-
yeah, look at the quads in 99.. LOL
::)
Like I said, ZERO vascularity compared to 98.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360609;image)
-
Like I said, ZERO vascularity compared to 98.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360609;image)
Hahahahahahahah awesome ! the kid is to stupid to comprehend bigger doesn't equate to better ;D
-
Hahahahahahahah awesome ! the kid is to stupid to comprehend bigger doesn't equate to better ;D
I mean, these screencaps are a fuckin' joke, even Jack Black would have abs on these.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360748;image)
The pics from the site before illustrate pretty clearly imo that his conditionining in 98 was superiour to 99.
-
Hahahahahahahah awesome ! the kid is to stupid to comprehend bigger doesn't equate to better ;D
zero vascularity?
what the fuck are you two idiots talking about?
::)
ronnie 98 was NEVER this big or grainy and cut:
15 pounds bigger with a bit better conditioning, just like ronnie said. ::)
note the vascularity everywhere as well. losers. ::)
-
ronnie's conditioning in 99 was noticably better than 98, especially in the quads, glutes and hams...
the proof is EVERYWHERE you look, yet the nuthuggers are in some sort of complete denial:
::)
why they care so much, who the fuck knows.. ::)
-
zero vascularity?
what the fuck are you two idiots talking about?
::)
ronnie 98 was NEVER this big or grainy and cut:
15 pounds bigger with a bit better conditioning, just like ronnie said. ::)
note the vascularity everywhere as well. losers. ::)
hahahahahaha he was 249 pounds in 1998 and 257 pounds in 1999 . 15 pounds would make him 264 pounds which he wasn't and his delts , his back and his abs aren't nearly as hard or as dry pics and videos confirm this and so does Ronnie when he said specifically 1998 was his best because his conditioning was better
-
ronnie's conditioning in 99 was noticably better than 98, especially in the quads, glutes and hams...
the proof is EVERYWHERE you look, yet the nuthuggers are in some sort of complete denial:
::)
why they care so much, who the fuck knows.. ::)
yeah it was noticeably better yet NOT one single expert agrees LMFAO he's just as conditioned as 1998/2001 15 pounds heavier LMFAO yet NOT one expert agree it's his best epic denial
-
yeah it was noticeably better yet NOT one single expert agrees
ronnie coleman agrees:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
I was almost 15 pounds heavier than last year, with a little bit better conditioning than last year.
:P
you are so screwed. trapped in your own quotes game LOL
::)
-
ronnie coleman agrees:
http://www.dennisbweis.com/Articles/Colman.html
:P
you are so screwed. trapped in your own quotes game LOL
::)
Yeah Ronnie agrees 1998 was better in FACT he's remained pretty consistent with that FACT just like the FACT he believe he couldn't beat Dorian ;)
don't forget Weider , Perine , McGough , Heath and Alves and Shawn Ray has said 98 was Ronnie's best too ;)
you're screwed with FACTS quotes , pics , videos all you have left is tears :'(
-
consistent? so saying 99 is better one day and 98 the next is consistent?
LOL
add another word to ND's ever growing list of english words he does not understand..
99>>98
-
consistent? so saying 99 is better one day and 98 the next is consistent?
LOL
add another word to ND's ever growing list of english words he does not understand..
99>>98
Consistent after the fact , and consistent with scores of other experts , you on the other hand have NOTHING as usual
1998 was better because he was harder and drier pics , videos and experts agree what's left? denial by dumb Hulkster
-
Hey Neo when you posted this quote from Ray you omitted a part you sneaky little weasel I wonder why ;)
owned again dumbass
1st - Ronnie Coleman
"Ridiculous" Ronnie Coleman would win his 6th Sandow Trophy in a row looking absolutely ridiculous!
This guy was from another planet! Ronnie added about a million pounds of muscle from the previous year and squashed the competition on sheer MASS! Unbelievable is what Ronnie was this night! Personally, I like the smaller version of 2001 when he won the ASC however, my hat goes off to a guy who packs on 40 more pounds of muscle in a year!
So add more to the growing list of people who all say 1998 and 2001 shit on 1999/2003 ;D
-
98>99
Hope this helps.
-
98>99
Hope this helps.
don't forget 03 too ;D
-
consistent? so saying 99 is better one day and 98 the next is consistent?
LOL
add another word to ND's ever growing list of english words he does not understand..
99>>98
Fucking LOL.
Constantly denying the fact he said 99 was better RIGHT AFTER THE CONTEST, vs saying 98 is better 3 times down the road kinda says one thing.. He believes 98 is better you fucking delusional clown! Lol!! Cause ya know, someone is gonna say, "hey I was better last year" right after the contest you fucking gimp.
-
Fucking LOL.
Constantly denying the fact he said 99 was better RIGHT AFTER THE CONTEST, vs saying 98 is better 3 times down the road kinda says one thing.. He believes 98 is better you fucking delusional clown! Lol!! Cause ya know, someone is gonna say, "hey I was better last year" right after the contest you fucking gimp.
He thinks if he continues to stick to his story he wont look as stupid and it only makes him look like more of a fucking moron. But he doesn't care about looking like a moron he's the same dummy who claimed Dorian should have lost one of the most dominating wins in Olympia history.
He knows nothing about bodybuilding.
-
98 is better than 99. 98 and 99 are better than 03.
-
99>>98.
enjoy the movies losers.
you will hate what you see.
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/ronnie-coleman-1999-mr-olympia-part-two/1160132027
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/1998-mr-olympia-part-1/267563152
ronnie's quads have a lot less seperation compared to 99, as you can clearly see.
anyone who can view these clips and say ronnie 98 was better is a complete and delusional moron, and is only doing so to fit some agenda..as you guys will no doubt do.. ::)
ronnie was not only bigger, he was also more cut - especially in the lower body.
the proof is all there.
countdown to the excuses!!
::)
-
He thinks if he continues to stick to his story he wont look as stupid and it only makes him look like more of a fucking moron. But he doesn't care about looking like a moron he's the same dummy who claimed Dorian should have lost one of the most dominating wins in Olympia history.
He knows nothing about bodybuilding.
I suggest you compare the two clips I posted. you will hate what you see.
and you will regret your words because you will look stupid.
and you will see that 'my story' -that ronnie himself has publicly agreed with - has been correct all along.
-
<ND and co frantically trying to come up with excuses after watching the video clips..>
::)
-
99>>98.
enjoy the movies losers.
you will hate what you see.
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/ronnie-coleman-1999-mr-olympia-part-two/1160132027
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/1998-mr-olympia-part-1/267563152
ronnie's quads have a lot less seperation compared to 99, as you can clearly see.
anyone who can view these clips and say ronnie 98 was better is a complete and delusional moron, and is only doing so to fit some agenda..as you guys will no doubt do.. ::)
ronnie was not only bigger, he was also more cut - especially in the lower body.
the proof is all there.
countdown to the excuses!!
::)
you cant be serious? He looks far drier in 98 you retard. Im not even going to go into the rediculous contrast on the 99 vid,... Ill go ahead and say it for you "Oh trying to call the vid fake, you nuthuggers are desperate"... Say what you want the contrast on the 99 video is retarded. And he STILL looks drier and more conditioned in 98, without the contrast. Fucking LOL again.
-
<ND and co frantically trying to come up with excuses after watching the video clips..>
::)
So melodramatic and as I've explained to you I have both 99-98 on video , youknoq this because I posted a shot of Ronnie that looks nothing like the one you keep posting ;)
I watched both videos on multipe occasions and the pics and videos confirm why many proclaim 98 is his best , it'a no wonder Ronnie amended his original statement he's harder & drier in his first win , clearly evident in his delts, back and midsection
-
consistent? so saying 99 is better one day and 98 the next is consistent?
LOL
add another word to ND's ever growing list of english words he does not understand..
99>>98
Awesome, you really got us. An obscure black and white rough draft vs a crappy magazine scan; really proves your point.
I mean, can this guy get any more desperate....lol ;D
-
One last time (as I won't get into that shit with you guys for years like you do lol, but keep it up, it's entertaining), I mean, these 2 pics sum up the scenario quite perfectly imo, and confirm what basically every single expert says; If you disagree Hulkster, then get your eyes checked; He was a few pounds heavier in 99, and exactly these few pounds worse in shape compared to 98 ;):
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360595;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360611;image) (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360612;image)
-
yeah, look at the quads in 99.. LOL
::)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360748;image)
Hulkster like I told you I have 98/99 on video and care to explain why once again your image doesn't match any others? ;)
-
One last time (as I won't get into that shit with you guys for years like you do lol, but keep it up, it's entertaining), I mean, these 2 pics sum up the scenario quite perfectly imo, and confirm what basically every single expert says; If you disagree Hulkster, then get your eyes checked; He was a few pounds heavier in 99, and exactly these few pounds worse in shape compared to 98 ;):
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360595;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360611;image) (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360612;image)
Great post !! lol
-
One last time (as I won't get into that shit with you guys for years like you do lol, but keep it up, it's entertaining), I mean, these 2 pics sum up the scenario quite perfectly imo, and confirm what basically every single expert says; If you disagree Hulkster, then get your eyes checked; He was a few pounds heavier in 99, and exactly these few pounds worse in shape compared to 98 ;):
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360595;image)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360611;image) (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360612;image)
No shit. Check out the striations on his the serratus, the delts, the chest, the tie ins.... I mean really Hulkster.
-
Hulkster like I told you I have 98/99 on video and care to explain why once again your image doesn't match any others? ;)
How fucking pathetic! It just keeps getting worse for Hulkster, and rightfully so. I mean, if you are so certain that Ronnie is that much better than every other bodybuilder, particularly Yates, then why in the hell post this shit??
-
yes, ronnie himself:
didn't you read his 99 victory seminar that I posted.
he states quite clearly he was better in 99 than in 98.
15 pounds bigger, a bit better conditioning.
facts proven by real life.
you guys are looking up at a blue sky and trying to argue that it is pink.. ::)
Yes, I actually read the whole thing (unlike you I bet), NOWHERE does he state as a fact he is better than the previous year. Heavier, yes. But with extra size comes hand in hand with a bigger stomach, body parts that gets out of sync with overall development (those calves seemed to be getting smaller). You seem to be confusing extra size = automatic win.
But ok, let's play your game. You speak for Ronnie and claim 1999 was his best shape. What does he say about Dorian during that contest on who would win ;D
You're fucking owned kiddo.
-
density & dryness win and lose contests and many claim Ronnie won 1998 because his glutes & hams where more dry and separated ( density & dryness ) , Ronnie's conditioning that day was unmatched again until 2001
I doubt 2003 would beat 1998 maybe , I doubt it. Maybe Ronnie would beat Dorian from the 1993 Olympia but again maybe not , maybe on size alone he would win , but I think Dorian from the black & white photoshoot at 269 pounds would beat any version of Ronnie because he wouldn't be dwarfed by 03 and would have better conditioning and balance and he would dwarf a 249 pound Ronnie with the same advantages already mentioned
I know a lot of people feel 2003 is his best and it simply isn't because his density & dryness pale in comparison to 98/01 as does his balance & proportion which is exactly why a majority of experts feel those showings are his best and may be the best ever
Dumb Neo posted a quote from Shawn Ray which states the obvious he won that show on pure size and nothing more his conditioning for that size was very good for that weight and here is another quote which touches on what I'm talking about
Wayne Demilla " I've said to Ronnie , " What you've got to realize is that in 98-99 you were probably in the best proportion you could be for your frame . Those muscles have gotten bigger. Just cos you're bigger , doesn't make you better . "
which lends credence that his density & dryness and balance & proportion progressively got worse when he became heavier which McGough mentions as well
Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001
RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .
I mean it's stating the obvious well to some of us ;D
Okay well fair point that it could go either way. I think if you look at the video's it's apparent that although 257 dry pounds was pretty massive at the time, that he dwarfed his competition (apart from later on backless monsters Dillet, Nasser etc), there is absolutely no doubt that Ronnie has a much more impressive physique as far as raw power - something which at one point was Dorian's strength. This basic first impression aspect would no longer be in Dorian's favour. No more "Dorian was 1st from the minute he walked out" type stuff like what people said in '93.
The last place people lose fat is the glutes and hams, Ronnie had the craziest glutes and hams in that show since Gaspari had at like 180lb years before. Quotes about balance and proportion being better at lower bodyweights are kind of redundant when you consider Bob Paris's balance+ proportion then consider his Olympia placings. As Jay found out in 2006 when he did what it took it takes size as well as pure condition. Shawn Ray was certainly more aesthetic/better balance/proportion/shape than Dorian, but side by side it was father and son stuff size-wise. I believe Ronnie's extra 30lb would have this same effect on Dorian, even if a few of those pounds are water, that's still a significant difference. Check the leg split, muscle fullness etc. Nasser had no back, Flex was too small. Dorian had these basic advantages over his contemporaries onstage, but 2003 Ronnie was bigger and thicker all over including back, more insane hams and glutes, still better aesthetics than Dorian (as you've conceded in past posts).
(http://i33.tinypic.com/23vg7cy.jpg)
Dorian's dryness was combined in his day with being bigger than everyone, and/or with a better back than everyone else. But when he was smaller Haney beat him, and when his back was less developed Momo beat him. 2003 Ronnie is bigger, including the back, just not as dry, but Haney and Momo still beat Dorian mostly on size/back development.
(http://creditplushealth.org/health%20picture/ronnie%20coleman%206%20mr%20olympia%202003.jpg)
I'm not sure quotes from before 2003 mean a whole lot, as Ronnie's condition in 2003 was better than 2000/2001, so the point Mr McGough was making isn't taking 2003 into account as it hadn't happened yet. What year is the Demilia quote from?
Vis a vis Dorian photoshoot '93, he looks absolutely insane, it's just so hard to be objective cos everyone looks so good backstage, the lighting is that much lower, it's so bright on a stage it washes out everything and suddenly the lower back and glutes/hams look more blobby and watery. Dorian is probably beter than most condition-wise in the '93 photoshoot, but still 12lb heavier than onstage so surely carrying a little more water than at the show? If he'd got onstage at that point with the 12 extra points he'd look fuller but not vintage lower back/ham dryness.
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360748;image)
Hulkster like I told you I have 98/99 on video and care to explain why once again your image doesn't match any others? ;)
because you purposely post bad ones to make Bizzy's images seem faked.
others have posted screencaps from 99 too and NONE are as shitty as yours.
I wonder why.
you post excellent nasser 98 shots but purposely post crappy ronnie ones:
I already exposed you on this before.
you are unreal.
honestly, why do you try and pull this shit when everyone can see what you are up to? ::)
ND expects everyone to think that his blurry crappy image of ronnie is legit meanwhile look at the one he takes of nasser for another thread:
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
the guy is so fucked up he purposely posts bad shots of ronnie 99 just so the nuthuggers can cry fake!
-
^
check it out. I exposed ND in the past about taking excellent screenshots of nasser 98 but purposely bad ones of ronnie 99 so that he had 'ammo' for the guy's claim that the 99 shots are faked..
just look at that. :o
ND you should be ashamed for trying to be so underhanded.
luckily we are all much smarter than you and can see your pathetic attempt.
unbelievable. :-\
-
Okay well fair point that it could go either way. I think if you look at the video's it's apparent that although 257 dry pounds was pretty massive at the time, that he dwarfed his competition (apart from later on backless monsters Dillet Nasser), there is absolutely no doubt that Ronnie has a much more impressive physique as far as raw power - something which at one point was Dorian's strength. This basic first impression aspect would no longer be in Dorian's favour. No more "Dorian was 1st from the minute he walked out" type stuff like what people said in '93.
The last place people lose fat is the glutes and hams, Ronnie had the craziest glutes and hams in that show since Gaspari had at like 180lb years before. Quotes about balance and proportion being better at lower bodyweights are kind of redundant when you consider Bob Paris's balance+ proportion then consider his Olympia placings. As Jay found out in 2006 when he did what it took it takes size as well as pure condition. Shawn Ray was certainly more aesthetic/better balance/proportion/shape than Dorian, but side by side it was father and son stuff size-wise. I believe Ronnie's extra 30lb would have this same effect on Dorian, even if a few of those pounds are water, that's still a significant difference. Check the leg split, muscle fullness etc. Nasser had no back, Flex was too small. Dorian had something big against everyone onstage, but Ronnie was bigger and thicker all over including back, more insane hams and glutes, better aesthetics (as you've conceded in past posts). If dryness alone won shows guys like Muntzer would have done a lot better. Dorian's dryness was combined with being bigger than everyone with better back than everyone. The latter two advantages would now go to 2003 Ronnie so it would be a different story. Dorian got beat in 92 cos when he was smaller even with that condition, this would happen again if Ronnie stood next to him, like a latter-day Haney.
(http://www.hardcorebodybuildingontheweb.com/precontestbible/Ronnie_Coleman_2.jpg)
(http://www.dorianyates.net/dorian/site/images/STYLES/dorianyates/images/gallery/images/dy145.jpg)
Maybe a slightly unfair comparison but it's really hard to find colour pics of Dorian doing this pose on a stage.
I'm not sure quotes from before 2003 mean a whole lot, as Ronnie's condition in 2003 was better than 2000/2001, so the point Mr McGough was making isn't taking 2003 into account as it hadn't happened yet. What year is the Demilia quote from?
Okay well fair point that it could go either way. I think if you look at the video's it's apparent that although 257 dry pounds was pretty massive at the time, that he dwarfed his competition (apart from later on backless monsters Dillet Nasser), there is absolutely no doubt that Ronnie has a much more impressive physique as far as raw power - something which at one point was Dorian's strength. This basic first impression aspect would no longer be in Dorian's favour. No more "Dorian was 1st from the minute he walked out" type stuff like what people said in '93.
Think about this ......Flex was at around his best in 1993 when he faced Dorian he and he was very distant second , fast-forward to 1998 and Ronnie just barely beat a less than stellar Flex who wasn't as sharp as he was in 1993 by the skin of his teeth ..I think it's very honest to say Dorian 1993 would beat Ronnie 1998 , I think Dorian would have a lot more problems with Ronnie 2001 ASC
The last place people lose fat is the glutes and hams, Ronnie had the craziest glutes and hams in that show since Gaspari had at like 180lb years before. Quotes about balance and proportion being better at lower bodyweights are kind of redundant when you consider Bob Paris's balance+ proportion then consider his Olympia placings. As Jay found out in 2006 when he did what it took it takes size as well as pure condition. Shawn Ray was certainly more aesthetic/better balance/proportion/shape than Dorian, but side by side it was father and son stuff size-wise. I believe Ronnie's extra 30lb would have this same effect on Dorian, even if a few of those pounds are water, that's still a significant difference. Check the leg split, muscle fullness etc. Nasser had no back, Flex was too small. Dorian had something big against everyone onstage, but Ronnie was bigger and thicker all over including back, more insane hams and glutes, better aesthetics (as you've conceded in past posts). If dryness alone won shows guys like Muntzer would have done a lot better. Dorian's dryness was combined with being bigger than everyone with better back than everyone. The latter two advantages would now go to 2003 Ronnie so it would be a different story. Dorian got beat in 92 cos when he was smaller even with that condition, this would happen again if Ronnie stood next to him, like a latter-day Haney.
Dorian has striated glutes it's not like Flex who was missing them in 1998 and Dorian's hams are great thick and fully developed , you wanna argue Ronnie has more striations that just knitpicking . quote on balance & proportion are most certainly not redundant and your analogy with Paris doesn't hold water because he was missing two other very key parts of the IFBB judging criteria ....conditioning & muscular bulk which is why he never won a single contest
Shawn Ray does have better aesthetics and shape ( depending on muscle ) compared to Dorian but not balance & proportion and Dorian had him on size , condition and balance which is why he always lost. If you're comparing Ronnie 2003 to Dorian 1993 have an edge in muscular bulk but it wouldn't in my opinion be able to off-set his disadvantages in now density & dryness and balance & proportion
And I'm talking about comparing Dorian at what I consider his best which is the black & white shots at 269 pounds where the size advantage becomes ever more less apparent and he's still ahead in density & dryness and balance & proportion ( see the pic of the back double biceps shot at 269 pounds and striated glutes and great hams )
Dorian didn't get beat in 92 he actually won that year I'm assuming you meant 91 he got beat by Haney not only because Haney was bigger but Dorian was a rookie in his first Mr Olympia contest ever and Haney was at a career best and this actually proves my point Dorian beat him in the muscularity round despite the size disadvantage , Dorian felt that Haney won due his size and his posing & presentation , I mean Dorian beat a career best Haney in the muscularity round despite being lighter that speaks volumes especially considering it was his first fucking Olympia and only his third fucking professional show , he was still very much rough around the edges
Here's my point Dorian at 269 pounds would beat Ronnie because he has a clear advantage in density & dryness , balance & proportion ( and BTW that Demilia quote is from 2003 ) and posing & presentation , I think he's more complete and a clearly better poser . the judges like size but especially like dense size which Dorian wrote the book on.
-
Yes, I actually read the whole thing (unlike you I bet), NOWHERE does he state as a fact he is better than the previous year. Heavier, yes. But with extra size comes hand in hand with a bigger stomach, body parts that gets out of sync with overall development (those calves seemed to be getting smaller). You seem to be confusing extra size = automatic win.
But ok, let's play your game. You speak for Ronnie and claim 1999 was his best shape. What does he say about Dorian during that contest on who would win ;D
You're fucking owned kiddo.
jesus, are you really an ND gimmick? because your reading compehension and understanding of the english language is just as bad as his is..
ronnie stated he was almost 15 pounds heavier WITH BETTER CONDITIONING.
if you can't understand that this means he is saying he was in better shape, well, there is no hope for you. you just don't understand english.
sorry. you have company there because ND famous for his lack of understanding of the english language..
-
because you purposely post bad ones to make Bizzy's images seem faked.
others have posted screencaps from 99 too and NONE are as shitty as yours.
I wonder why.
you post excellent nasser 98 shots but purposely post crappy ronnie ones:
I already exposed you on this before.
you are unreal.
honestly, why do you try and pull this shit when everyone can see what you are up to? ::)
ND expects everyone to think that his blurry crappy image of ronnie is legit meanwhile look at the one he takes of nasser for another thread:
::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
the guy is so fucked up he purposely posts bad shots of ronnie 99 just so the nuthuggers can cry fake!
meltdown ;)
and I hate to break it to you sport that video is UNTOUCHED I will provide you with the link so you can download it yourself and see anything I post is original and untouched ;) if it's not I'll delete my account and if it is you delete yours ;)
Bizzy needs NO help from anyone to show his screencaps are fucked because he admitted he adjusts lighting and contrast and he adds sharpening , here is the fucking proof he admits to tampering with pics , so stop trying to project your buddies handy work on everyone else , everyone knows his screencaps are fucked even one of the best contest photographers in the business busted you using them.
-
jesus, are you really an ND gimmick? because your reading compehension and understanding of the english language is just as bad as his is..
ronnie stated he was almost 15 pounds heavier WITH BETTER CONDITIONING.
if you can't understand that this means he is saying he was in better shape, well, there is no hope for you. you just don't understand english.
sorry. you have company there because ND famous for his lack of understanding of the english language..
You're the fucking moron who doesn't know what amend means ,here to go stupid
amend
One entry found.
Main Entry: amend
Pronunciation: \ə-ˈmend\
Function: verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French amender, modification of Latin emendare, from e, ex out + menda fault; akin to Latin mendax lying, mendicus beggar, and perhaps to Sanskrit mindā physical defect
Date: 13th century
transitive verb 1 : to put right; especially : to make emendations in (as a text)
2 a : to change or modify for the better : improve <amend the situation> b : to alter especially in phraseology; especially : to alter formally by modification, deletion, or addition <amend a constitution>intransitive verb : to reform oneself
synonyms see correct
— amend·able \-ˈmen-də-bəl\ adjective
— amend·er noun
That original statement has been amended , three fucking times now stupid.
1
Q ] There are those who feel you were at your best when you competed lighter, which for you was in the low 270's, and those who say you were best in the 290's. Was there a particular look you presented that you preferred over the others?
dot
Number one. That one was incredible to me. It (Ronnie's first Olympia win in 1998) always will be and nothing will ever take the place of that one. Everything was just spot on for that show. I had to overcome so much to win that one too.
I had guys in front of me who had beaten me for the last ten years or so. Nobody picked me to go in and win that show because I had gotten ninth the year before. I had to come with an incredible package and blow all the judges away and that's what I pretty much did.
2 Special ed's radio show , Ronnie what was your best year? Ronnie I would have to say my first because my conditioning was spot-on for that show
3 http://clips.team-andro.com/watch/6ec386cb64df22dff37b/Superstar-Seminar-Ronnie-Coleman-Phil-Heath-Dexter-Jackson
so STFU already stupid.
-
and I hate to break it to you sport that video is UNTOUCHED I will provide you with the link so you can download it yourself and see anything I post is original and untouched
you know how many times people like Bizzy and ForcedReps provided the link to downloads for some of their source material to you morons?
and guess what?
you claimed it was faked anyway.
recall the ownings of you people by forcedreps with all the rapidshare files he provided you with..
and you ignored it. why? because you can't admit you were proven WRONG.
nice try.
::) ::) ::)
-
you know how many times people like Bizzy and ForcedReps provided the link to downloads for some of their source material to you morons?
and guess what?
you claimed it was faked anyway.
recall the ownings of you people by forcedreps with all the rapidshare files he provided you with..
and you ignored it. why? because you can't admit you were proven WRONG.
nice try.
::) ::) ::)
I never ONCE claimed forcedreps screencaps were fake LIAR and I noticed you're owned so fucking bad you didn't even commenting on the PROOF I just posted showing Bizzy admitting he tampers with pics
what else are you gonna so? you're fucked and look like the dummy you are. so your response is to create a lie ::) Bizzy admitted he tampers with lighting , contrast , he sharpens pics LMFAO you have nothing put your tail between your legs and do the walk of shame
I own you and your fucked screencaps ;)
-
I never ONCE claimed forcedreps screencaps were fake LIAR
no, you didn't. but all your guy friends DID. notice, again if you knew how to read, you would see I referred to group of you idiots..
and you ignored Bizzy's posts re the screencaps. he publicly stated many times that the pics were untouched and he provided links as well.
but you ignored all this for the same reasons your moronic friends keep claiming all the forcedreps shots were faked:
because ronnie 99 was much better than dorian, better than 98 ronnie, and the proof is right there in front of you.
but you can't deal with it.
so you cry fake.
its that simple.
period.
::)
-
no, you didn't. but all your guy friends DID. notice, again if you knew how to read, you would see I referred to group of you idiots..
and you ignored Bizzy's posts re the screencaps. he publicly stated many times that the pics were untouched and he provided links as well.
but you ignored all this for the same reasons your moronic friends keep claiming all the forcedreps shots were faked:
because ronnie 99 was much better than dorian, better than 98 ronnie, and the proof is right there in front of you.
but you can't deal with it.
so you cry fake.
its that simple.
period.
::)
Bizzy did say he didn't sharpen pics and who busted him in that lie? ;) I DID he forgot months earlier he sharpened pics hahahahaha
I just provide PROOF POSITIVE Bizzy works screencaps and as usual when your busted you say everyone else is wrong , it must suck constantly being beat over the fucking head by me that's why all you do is troll and spam and lace every post with personal attacks because you're defeated and the best part is I beat you using your own hero ;)
go read the Bizzy posts again douche where he says outright he sharpens pics , tampers with contrast and lighting LMFAO once again I own you and it's not really your fault because you have limited intelligence and I don't ( see where you admit I'm smart ;) ) lmfao
-
I just provide PROOF POSITIVE Bizzy works screencaps
you don't get it.
::)
the pics he worked he TOLD US AHEAD OF TIME that he worked them. he was playing around.
you even copied one of his posts that shows this! duh! ::)
the ronnie shots were legit as can be. and he stated and proved this many times.
but you couldn't accept this because they crush your argument.
so you ignored them.
nice try attempt 1048567
::)
-
you don't get it.
::)
the pics he worked he TOLD US AHEAD OF TIME that he worked them. he was playing around.
you even copied one of his posts that shows this! duh! ::)
the ronnie shots were legit as can be. and he stated and proved this many times.
but you couldn't accept this because they crush your argument.
so you ignored them.
nice try attempt 1048567
::)
no he didn't liar , Hulkster you have no integrity or honesty and you look like a moron ontop denying the obvious
When people first started to question his screencaps they actually used the ones that forcedreps provides because Bizzy's didn't match his , that's when the professional graphic artist said outright his screencaps were the result of the sharpen tool which Bizzy denied every using or even knowing about
Now this is where I personally busted him because I went back and looked at his previous posts and sure as shit he posted pics where he says specifically he using the sharpening tool 8 months previous , he got real silent after that ;)
So no he didn't admit ahead of time and the fact that you're desperately trying to defend him shows how pathetic you are , even Kevin Horton said specifically there was a difference between the ones Bizzy posted and Forcedreps and he busted YOU using them
in the end you're fucked your screencaps were worked , every expert agrees 1998 is better than 1999 , Ronnie has even said three times he was better in 1998 and look where you are now , getting bitched slapped in another thread
must really suck being you :-\
-
you don't get it.
::)
the pics he worked he TOLD US AHEAD OF TIME that he worked them. he was playing around.
you even copied one of his posts that shows this! duh! ::)
the ronnie shots were legit as can be. and he stated and proved this many times.
but you couldn't accept this because they crush your argument.
so you ignored them.
nice try attempt 1048567
::)
Holy shit your fucking sad.
-
Holy shit your fucking sad.
he really is , it's not even funny anymore
He says 1999 is Ronnie best we say no 98/01 is he says we're all wrong , all the experts say 98/01 , he says they're all wrong , Ronnie says 98 three times Hulkster says he's a liar , he lies about everything
We say hey those screencaps look funny , he says they're fine , we compare them to others and they still look odd , he says they're fine , a professional graphic artist says they're worked Hulkster says he's wrong , Kevin Horton confirms they're worked , Hulkster says they're wrong , the guy who fucking did them said they're worked and still Hulkster says he's wrong
It's not even funny anymore , the kid is just beaten down in to submission and looks pathetic trying to save face in defeat :-\
-
he really is , it's not even funny anymore
He says 1999 is Ronnie best we say no 98/01 is he says we're all wrong , all the experts say 98/01 , he says they're all wrong , Ronnie says 98 three times Hulkster says he's a liar , he lies about everything
We say hey those screencaps look funny , he says they're fine , we compare them to others and they still look odd , he says they're fine , a professional graphic artist says they're worked Hulkster says he's wrong , Kevin Horton confirms they're worked , Hulkster says they're wrong , the guy who fucking did them said they're worked and still Hulkster says he's wrong
It's not even funny anymore , the kid is just beaten down in to submission and looks pathetic trying to save face in defeat :-\
Trying to say Bizzy was just messing around... lol.
-
Holy shit your fucking sad.
holy shit you are in complete denial.
ND was exposed red handed.
its all right there in his post. he even copied bizzy's post where he showed us how he was adjusting pics, and then acts like Bizzy tried to hide it..LOL ::)
are you honestly this dumb that you don't understand what is going on here?
seriously.
we all know ND has his reasons for being dumb (he has to- other wise his arguments fail)
but the rest of you - you should know better..
-
Trying to say Bizzy was just messing around... lol.
see your friend ND's pic of bizzy's post.
he should not have posted that.
he shows us that his whole argument about bizzy is wrong.
he never tried to hide anything.
and ND is so dumb he shows us all with this copy of his post LOL
::)
-
LOL bizzy even says he was posting three pics "as a joke"
and you guys are denying that he was messing around. LOL
not according to his posts.
thanks guys.
you own yourselves with this stuff.
please, keep posting. you are making this so damn easy!
and totally making yourselves look stupid at the same time.
typical of nuthuggers though. this is nothing new.
-
Trying to say Bizzy was just messing around... lol.
[/quote
What's funny is when the professional graphic artist outright said Bizzy's pic was oversharpened , Bizzy denied outright he even knew what the sharpening tool was , So i do a search of his post history and the moron forgot he was posting sharpened images 8 months earlier lmao needless to say he doesn't post anymore and left Hullster to hold the bag
Kevin Horton busted him to boot ! The funny part is Hulkster had acess to Forcedreps screencaps but choose to post the worked ones from Bizzy , stupid kid :-\
-
Hulkster still looking for any angle to spin his bullshit
Hulkster some points to ponder Bizzy only came up with that AFTER peopled questioned him why it didn't look like Forecedreps and in Fact that's the one Kevin Horton busted you using ;)
and when the graphic artist said outright some of his screencaps were sharpened Bizzy made a major mistake he denied he did it and claimed he didn't evenknow what the sharpening tool was , being stupid like you he coundn't keep track of his bullshit and this is where I caught him in a lie
After denying he knew what the sharpening tool was I did a search history on his posts and low and behold I have the moron posting how he sharpened pics of Yates lmmfao opppppsssss busted Bizzy you played ypur hand , I'll tell you what he's smarter than you once exposed he took off and you're still here getting beat down
You can never win because you're to stupid to quit while you're ahead.
-
holy shit you are in complete denial.
ND was exposed red handed.
its all right there in his post. he even copied bizzy's post where he showed us how he was adjusting pics, and then acts like Bizzy tried to hide it..LOL ::)
are you honestly this dumb that you don't understand what is going on here?
seriously.
we all know ND has his reasons for being dumb (he has to- other wise his arguments fail)
but the rest of you - you should know better..
Keep rationalizing.. You are truely fucking sad. :-\
-
Keep rationalizing.. You are truely fucking sad. :-\
He really is :-\
he's owned everywhere and still denies
-
Hulkster ran away ;)
-
no I am right here.
just amazed at the complete denial going on here, even after the two videos were posted for comparisons..
::)
it seems that nothing will ever convince the nuthuggers that not only was ronnie 99 better than dorian, but also better than ronnie 98 as well.
even though the photage is undeniable..it is denied anyway... ::)
-
no I am right here.
just amazed at the complete denial going on here, even after the two videos were posted for comparisons..
::)
it seems that nothing will ever convince the nuthuggers that not only was ronnie 99 better than dorian, but also better than ronnie 98 as well.
even though the photage is undeniable..it is denied anyway... ::)
Oh stop projecting. The only one in denial here is you, dumbass; taking on the entire world armed with nothing but your opinion. Fucking retard.
-
LOL only my opinion?
no. I have photographic and film proof. and quotes from Ronnie too.
and many many others share my opinion also, because they have seen the proof and do not deny it like you morons do..
but of course you have to deny the proof.
otherwise you are denying your blind love for the one armed bandit.
-
you 2 have serious issues does not even begin to describe this shit
-
:-*
-
:-*
Lol. What was that? Oh Ronnie said 98 was better than 99? Oh your whole argument is that 99 is teh best ever? Oh your own argument was single handedly destroyed by your Hero?
OOOOOPPPPPSSSS.
Stick to that opinion Hulkster, your sure to win with that insurmountable evidence.
HAHAHA.
:-\
-
as much as the nuthuggers may be in complete denial of all things ronnie coleman, even they must admit that these are the greatest arms in the history of the sport:
:o
-
as much as the nuthuggers may be in complete denial of all things ronnie coleman, even they must admit that these are the greatest arms in the history of the sport:
:o
Bar none, without a doubt the greatest Arms in BB.
-
as much as the nuthuggers may be in complete denial of all things ronnie coleman, even they must admit that these are the greatest arms in the history of the sport:
:o
That may be true but Jay looks alot better in that shot than Ronnie.
-
Bump for 98 being better than 99 ;D
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=320521.0;attach=360748;image)
Hulkster like I told you I have 98/99 on video and care to explain why once again your image doesn't match any others? ;)
Slighty darkened = unfair manipulation of contrast/lighting. Make it a black and white shadowfest and it's okay though right?
-
Bump for 98 being better than 99 ;D
I second that motion. Motion is passed.;D
-
Slighty darkened = unfair manipulation of contrast/lighting. Make it a black and white shadowfest and it's okay though right?
are you fucking kidding? ::)
-
Slighty darkened = unfair manipulation of contrast/lighting. Make it a black and white shadowfest and it's okay though right?
Thats not even slightly, and no black and white should be reserved to match against other black and white photography. But to say slightly manipulated is rediculous. Thats not even human looking skin tone. ::)