Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MattT on March 07, 2010, 05:25:57 PM

Title: After further review Dexter Jackson should have placed 3rd.
Post by: MattT on March 07, 2010, 05:25:57 PM
Comparing his pics to when he won the 2008 ASC, he was not as sharp as he was when he won back in 2008, his legs were flat from the front, and just didn't have that look he's known for.  So Phil should have won, he was the most freaky, and conditioned guy in the show.

(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_O5C0007.jpg)

2008 ASC
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_47I1575.jpg)

Title: Re: After further review Dexter Jackson should have placed 3rd.
Post by: Kwon on March 07, 2010, 05:28:24 PM
I think he even looked better now than 2008!
Title: Re: After further review Dexter Jackson should have placed 3rd.
Post by: MattT on March 07, 2010, 05:28:37 PM
He packed on some size in the last 2 years, but sacrificed some separation in the process.  People say dex looks the same each year, packed on a bit of muscle from 2008 to 2010.  Now if he can come in 100% condition he still has a chance to place 2nd at the O.
Title: Re: After further review Dexter Jackson should have placed 3rd.
Post by: HTexan on March 07, 2010, 10:41:57 PM
I think he even looked better now than 2008!
x2 less ninja turtle-ish this year
Title: Re: After further review Dexter Jackson should have placed 3rd.
Post by: Lion666 on March 07, 2010, 10:48:28 PM
by those pics,,, he looks almost the same... lol
his bis look smaller and his tris look bigger this year...  although he does look more dry... they are real close anyways 
Title: Re: After further review Dexter Jackson should have placed 3rd.
Post by: alnassak on March 07, 2010, 10:49:25 PM
Now if he can come in 100% condition he still has a chance to place 2nd at the O.

hahaha...