Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Method101 on March 10, 2010, 03:25:59 AM

Title: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Method101 on March 10, 2010, 03:25:59 AM
Hardly changed at all.

2009 Arnold
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_H4X2481_UEGWJEFQFM.jpg)


2010 Arnold
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_O5C0500.jpg)
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on March 10, 2010, 03:42:37 AM
same weight?
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Cleanest Natural on March 10, 2010, 03:44:31 AM
He seems a little bigger though. Also holdin more water
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: JasonH on March 10, 2010, 03:45:38 AM
Maybe it justifies his Arnold win then? People have been going on about it as if he'd lost quality, or he wasn't dry enough etc etc - I can barely tell the difference between the two pictures and I'm pretty sure the judges couldn't tell either.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: kyomu on March 10, 2010, 03:53:39 AM
I see major change in thickness.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: MORTALCOIL on March 10, 2010, 04:01:15 AM
From that pic, he's holding a little more water but not as bad as some have said. But his traps look better, might be the slightly different angle. Also his tris look a bit fuller, bis definitely look softer.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: kyomu on March 10, 2010, 04:03:12 AM
From that pic, he's holding a little more water but not as bad as some have said. But his traps look better, might be the slightly different angle. Also his tris look a bit fuller, bis definitely look softer.
Yes. Thicker but softer also.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: MORTALCOIL on March 10, 2010, 04:05:56 AM
You can see he's not as conditioned from his obliques mainly. His waist is no better nor worse than last year but his obliques do look bigger and that's water most likely.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Meso_z on March 10, 2010, 04:09:40 AM
Hardly changed at all.

2009 Arnold
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_H4X2481_UEGWJEFQFM.jpg)


2010 Arnold
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_O5C0500.jpg)

at this level, its very hard to show visible improvements.

Small details do matter when youre pretty much maxed out... thickness, dryness etc..
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: alnassak on March 10, 2010, 04:22:26 AM
How about Coleman 2002 to 2003 ..?
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on March 10, 2010, 04:29:14 AM
How about Coleman 2002 to 2003 ..?

or dorian 92 t0 93 or nasser 94 to 95 or ronnie 97 to 98 or jay 2000 to 2001!!..
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: MORTALCOIL on March 10, 2010, 04:33:53 AM
Actually, Ronnie's tranformation from2002 to 2003 is the most surprising because since the 2001 AC is seemed to be declining. Dorian from 92 to 93 was also crazy because it really set a new standard but he was still on his way up. You could tell Nasser and Jay had still a growth potential though. Coleman just brought a freakier than freaky physiquue where lines and aesthetics meant nothing anymore. But he still could handle the mass even with that gut to just crush the competition (which was no very good though that year).
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Meso_z on March 10, 2010, 04:38:29 AM
How about Coleman 2002 to 2003 ..?

coleman was overdieted in 2002 or seems to have gotten sick before the contest.imo
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: MORTALCOIL on March 10, 2010, 04:44:28 AM
coleman was overdieted in 2002 or seems to have gotten sick before the contest.imo

He didn't look good at the 2001 O either.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on March 10, 2010, 04:48:13 AM
He didn't look good at the 2001 O either.

same can be said about his shape in 2000.. many felt levrone was better!.. ronnie was great but like dorian he didnt deserve all his olympia victories!..
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: MORTALCOIL on March 10, 2010, 04:56:04 AM
I agree he didn't look good in 2000 also. But Levrone showed up with half a body. He could have showe dup in a wheelchait that it would have been the same. No legs at all.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on March 10, 2010, 04:59:30 AM
I agree he didn't look good in 2000 also. But Levrone showed up with half a body. He could have showe dup in a wheelchait that it would have been the same. No legs at all.

most of the top guys were not in good shapes on that day, flex, nasser were both far away from their best and i am not sure about shawn ray.. bad for the olympia but good for ronnie!!..
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Genius on March 10, 2010, 05:49:53 AM
coleman was overdieted in 2002 or seems to have gotten sick before the contest.imo

Kevin gave him a run for the money that year.

Ronnie's back saved him. It was "close".
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: BanksMcgee on March 10, 2010, 06:28:13 AM
Facial expression and hair due is the biggest difference.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Game Time on March 10, 2010, 07:15:35 AM
His goatee is clearly thicker in 2009
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on March 10, 2010, 07:20:03 AM
even the same posing trunk!!.. this is a proof he didnt sell it ;D
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: dantelis on March 10, 2010, 07:24:04 AM
Hardly changed at all.

2009 Arnold
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_H4X2481_UEGWJEFQFM.jpg)


2010 Arnold
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/_O5C0500.jpg)

Anyone else think Kai's biceps look weird?  They seem like he has a tennis ball in his arm in these shots and they don't seem balanced by his triceps. 
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: lastrep on March 10, 2010, 07:40:30 AM
He's bigger and SHARPER in 2010
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: MORTALCOIL on March 10, 2010, 07:44:54 AM
Anyone else think Kai's biceps look weird?  They seem like he has a tennis ball in his arm in these shots and they don't seem balanced by his triceps. 

Not really. Probably has a very short bicep. The insertion is so far from the elbow that it gives that impression but also is responible for the crazy peak he's got. His triceps are not bad at all but they don't pop the same way. Also he seems less confortable with triceps poses.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Palpatine Q on March 10, 2010, 07:47:37 AM
Not really. Probably has a very short bicep. The insertion is so far from the elbow that it gives that impression but also is responible for the crazy peak he's got. His triceps are not bad at all but they don't pop the same way. Also he seems less confortable with triceps poses.

Wiggs says he knows for a FACT the he oils his biceps
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on March 10, 2010, 07:51:42 AM
Wiggs says he knows for a FACT the he oils his biceps

yes sure he oild all his body before posing, what is strange in this ;D :-X
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: MORTALCOIL on March 10, 2010, 07:53:11 AM
Well, he might but I don't think it's that obivous from the pics. Nothing close to the likes of Flex, Nasser, Ernier Taylor,...
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: James Blunt on March 10, 2010, 07:56:12 AM
Biceps don't look out of the ordinary to me. Aside from being gigantic.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on March 10, 2010, 08:00:58 AM
Well, he might but I don't think it's that obivous from the pics. Nothing close to the likes of Flex, Nasser, Ernier Taylor,...

scar tissue :-X
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: MORTALCOIL on March 10, 2010, 08:06:34 AM
 ;D or  ::)
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on March 10, 2010, 08:18:48 AM
;D or  ::)

 :P or  :-X
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Wiggs on March 10, 2010, 08:30:19 AM
Wiggs says he knows for a FACT the he oils his biceps

This
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: jude2 on March 10, 2010, 07:24:15 PM
same weight?
About 10 pounds heavier. Kai has made some amazing gains, over 50 pounds of muscle since winning the Team Universe in 2004. He needs to stop playing the size game now and consentrate on his conditioning.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on March 10, 2010, 07:44:46 PM
About 10 pounds heavier. Kai has made some amazing gains, over 50 pounds of muscle since winning the Team Universe in 2004. He needs to stop playing the size game now and consentrate on his conditioning.

if he was really heavier this year than last year so sure he has improved because shape wise he was more or less the same!..
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: dr.chimps on March 10, 2010, 07:53:16 PM
Wiggs says he knows for a FACT the he oils his biceps
Probably. Site injections? Absolutely.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: ChristopherA on March 10, 2010, 08:31:11 PM
His obliques got way bigger. His waist doesnt look good already and is obviously growing bigger and looking worse. Bis look wierd/shitty in most shots to me. Health smokes his ass,gimme a break. I dont care how much wider he is, who cares.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: jude2 on March 10, 2010, 08:43:35 PM
if he was really heavier this year than last year so sure he has improved because shape wise he was more or less the same!..
Agreed slightly.
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: arce1988 on March 10, 2010, 11:59:14 PM
 PED
Title: Re: K.Greene 09/10 Comparison
Post by: d0nny2600 on March 11, 2010, 02:08:49 AM
All Oil
(http://i32.tinypic.com/1osr4o.jpg)