Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: kyomu on March 15, 2010, 01:51:19 AM

Title: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: kyomu on March 15, 2010, 01:51:19 AM
This guy gave me a huge impact. Huge muscle with deep separation.
Sure. Maybe not aesthetic. But he has the serious hardcore muscle.
The guy like this should place high.
Because, above all, Bodybuilding is the muscle.

(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-217.jpg)
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-212.jpg)
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-213.jpg)
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-218.jpg)
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-220.jpg)
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: ironneck on March 15, 2010, 01:53:18 AM
looks great
like an older version of me
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Skeletor on March 15, 2010, 02:12:24 AM
Amazing conditioning.

Those triceps are sliced, remind me of Bannout.

I think Kefalianos deserved to place higher than Roelly.

What is his weight?
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: kyomu on March 15, 2010, 02:14:30 AM
Amazing conditioning.

Those triceps are sliced, remind me of Bannout.

I think Kefalianos deserved to place higher than Roelly.

What is his weight?
I dont know but
Looks like heaviest guy in the aussie show.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: XXXII/LX on March 15, 2010, 02:34:19 AM
This guy gave me a huge impact. Huge muscle with deep separation.
Sure. Maybe not aesthetic. But he has the serious hardcore muscle.
The guy like this should place high.
Because, above all, Bodybuilding is the muscle.

(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-217.jpg)
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-212.jpg)
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-213.jpg)
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-218.jpg)
(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-220.jpg)

Who cares about aesthetics? Not the IFBB judges. That's pretty apparent when you have a sloppy mess like Cutler beating guys like Jackson at the O. This dude owns Cutler.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Quickerblade on March 15, 2010, 02:53:42 AM
This guy i believe should of taken 3rd atleast, looked great, and a nice guy too!
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: kyomu on March 15, 2010, 02:54:56 AM
Who cares about aesthetics? Not the IFBB judges. That's pretty apparent when you have a sloppy mess like Cutler beating guys like Jackson at the O. This dude owns Cutler.
Mmm I dont think so. Cutler is bigger than this guy.
Because, Cutler made Branch look like his son in Mr.O 2009.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: The_Hammer on March 15, 2010, 03:28:15 AM
How tall is he?
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: kiwiol on March 15, 2010, 03:29:49 AM
I dont know but
Looks like heaviest guy in the aussie show.

He should've placed third, over Roelly, who gets killed in the callouts in the back poses.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Meso_z on March 15, 2010, 03:30:50 AM
How tall is he?

5'7.

Should have placed above that roelly retard.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: _bruce_ on March 15, 2010, 03:37:59 AM
Looks great
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Petrucci on March 15, 2010, 06:36:02 AM
This guy gave me a huge impact.

sorry but i LOLed!! to this


but on a serious note, he has great triceps, good all around legs, good midsection and conditioning





Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: marcos chacon on March 15, 2010, 07:59:52 AM
3RD FOR ME NO DOUBT, HE HAS TONS OF MUSCLE AND SLICED
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: The.Giant on March 15, 2010, 08:14:48 AM
Wasn't originally a fan but the dude has noticeably improved from his last contest. Good for him.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Stavios on March 15, 2010, 08:31:58 AM
if he lose another 4-5 pounds from the rear he will be much harder to beat.

great bodybuilder.

funny cause everybody was saying he looked like shit last year and that he souldn't be a pro  ;D
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Krankenstein on March 15, 2010, 08:37:02 AM
Dead / retired (with about 75lbs or so of less muscle) within 4 years
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: njflex on March 15, 2010, 10:15:43 AM
that is some serious thickness,sliced and might have the best calves in bbing right now.any more size could hurt him,but i think by now he is maxxed out no?just keep coming in like this and he will be ok at smaller shows,i don't think a mr o title is in his future but whatever he is still good to qualify.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Hellenic on March 15, 2010, 10:21:54 AM
He was 235 at the Australian Pro.
Here's a few more pics that you probably haven't seen.



Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Nasty Nate on March 15, 2010, 10:22:15 AM
yeah he looks fuckin awesome
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Eirik on March 15, 2010, 01:17:04 PM
Michael is a great guy. I trained with him when i was on holiday at Kos in Greece. He was working as a taxi driver and bouncer.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 15, 2010, 02:57:56 PM
#1, kyomuy is a damaged little f@ggot who saves paco's fecal matter in ziploc bags for latter "use"

#2  i would be a terrible bodubuildign judge, because kefalianos, in these pictures, looks better, more symmetrical, more balanced, and dryer then jay at the olympia last year.....yet he is placing out of the top 3 in 3rd teir shows
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: benchmstr on March 15, 2010, 03:00:32 PM
he looks like a smaller version of my cock...

bench
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 15, 2010, 03:04:41 PM
Looks good and when you think he is natural it makes his physique all that much better.As bob says drugs are only a very small part of Pro BB.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: kyomu on March 15, 2010, 03:08:31 PM
Godamnit... :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=324351.0;attach=363213;image)
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 15, 2010, 03:23:16 PM
Looks good and when you think he is natural it makes his physique all that much better.As bob says drugs are only a very small part of Pro BB.


i agree, steroids really are passe these days now that the equipment has gotten so much better and nutritional information has progressed so much

and even when pros did use steroids, they didnt really use alot.............why i was just reading last night on the md forums, and lee priest said he doesnt use growth hormone, and the biggest cycle he will do is 500mg of enanthate a week and "maybe" a shot of deca

ao when you comapre lee to a guy with similar stature from the early 80's, and notice hwo much the bodies have changed...........you know that it can be attributed to better equipment, harder training, and better nutritional information

..........no big mystery
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: benchmstr on March 15, 2010, 03:26:10 PM

i agree, steroids really are passe these days now that the equipment has gotten so much better and nutritional information has progressed so much

and even when pros did use steroids, they didnt really use alot.............why i was just reading last night on the md forums, and lee priest said he doesnt use growth hormone, and the biggest cycle he will do is 500mg of enanthate a week and "maybe" a shot of deca

ao when you comapre lee to a guy with similar stature from the early 80's, and notice hwo much the bodies have changed...........you know that it can be attributed to better equipment, harder training, and better nutritional information

..........no big mystery

you dont actually believe that shit....do you?

if so, i invite you to post on professionalmuscle to have your eyes opened...

bench
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 15, 2010, 03:29:58 PM
you dont actually believe that shit....do you?

if so, i invite you to post on professionalmuscle to have your eyes opened...

bench

i though the sarcasm in my post was pretty evident,


bodybuilding =  80% drugs + 10% genetics + 10% training, nutrition, ect....
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: kyomu on March 15, 2010, 03:31:06 PM
i though the sarcasm in my post was pretty evident,


bodybuilding =  80% drugs + 10% genetics + 10% training, nutrition, ect....
Typical comment of  fat skinny hardgainer.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: benchmstr on March 15, 2010, 03:31:18 PM
i though the sarcasm in my post was pretty evident,


bodybuilding =  90% drugs + 7% genetics + 3% training, nutrition, ect....
fixed

bench
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: io856 on March 15, 2010, 03:32:57 PM

i agree, steroids really are passe these days now that the equipment has gotten so much better and nutritional information has progressed so much

and even when pros did use steroids, they didnt really use alot.............why i was just reading last night on the md forums, and lee priest said he doesnt use growth hormone, and the biggest cycle he will do is 500mg of enanthate a week and "maybe" a shot of deca

ao when you comapre lee to a guy with similar stature from the early 80's, and notice hwo much the bodies have changed...........you know that it can be attributed to better equipment, harder training, and better nutritional information

..........no big mystery

Lee would look massive at 200lbs with his height

Thats not a lot of eating, drugs to achieve that
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 15, 2010, 03:34:47 PM
Quote for truth.The only reason this guy reps australia is the greeks would not give him his pro card so he got a gift in australia and now reps australia at contests.Seems about right I think it was the promoter who got the pro card for him now that's not how Chick got his pro card 12 long hard years for old chick.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 15, 2010, 03:39:30 PM
Lee would look massive at 200lbs with his height

Thats not a lot of eating, drugs to achieve that
i agree that with lee's height, he can looks massive and filled out easier........but my poing was that he is lying about his cycles

danny padilla and lee are about the same height.......and there is a big change between the physiques from the early 80's until today.....that change is due to the drugs ,
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 15, 2010, 03:42:27 PM
Illegal drug use is banned by the IFBB.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 15, 2010, 03:46:24 PM
Typical comment of  fat skinny hardgainer.

......says the homosexual asian fella who: likes to talk about bodybuilding, likes to hang out with (schmoe) bodybuilders, likes to dress like a bodubuilder


but.........oops........ ...looks nothing like a bodyubuilder, acutally has very little muscle at all


its ok man, we all know that you just pose as a bodubuilder so you can sniff chacon's and paco's underwear in the guy locker room

Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 15, 2010, 03:48:17 PM
Will they test pros when BB is an Olympic sport?
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: kyomu on March 15, 2010, 03:51:35 PM
......says the homosexual asian fella who: likes to talk about bodybuilding, likes to hang out with (schmoe) bodybuilders, likes to dress like a bodubuilder


but.........oops........ ...looks nothing like a bodyubuilder, acutally has very little muscle at all


its ok man, we all know that you just pose as a bodubuilder so you can sniff chacon's and paco's underwear in the guy locker room


Yet I am loooooooooooooooot bigger than you and popular among chics.

If not, prove it with your pic. Loser.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Hellenic on March 15, 2010, 04:06:19 PM
Quote for truth.The only reason this guy reps australia is the greeks would not give him his pro card so he got a gift in australia and now reps australia at contests.Seems about right I think it was the promoter who got the pro card for him now that's not how Chick got his pro card 12 long hard years for old chick.

You are really misinformed.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 15, 2010, 04:08:50 PM
Well tell us all how he got his Pro card and why he reps australia and the friendship with him and the promoter.We await your words.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 15, 2010, 04:26:29 PM
Still waiting miss Helen of Greece.If I am so misinformed fill us all in on the FACTS just saying.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 15, 2010, 08:47:01 PM
Still waiting for a reply Hellenic.You say I am misinformed well spill it champ I bet you know everything even how he got his Pro card.Lets go big boy.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: LATS on March 15, 2010, 09:52:04 PM
 i can tell ya that the guys in the 80's did a hell of a lot of drugs also.. they did not have the growth and the insulin but believe me .. they abused.. dont buy into the "ironager" stuff about only 500 mgs of test ect.. a mag editor friend of mine knew and talked to all those guys from coe to deferro ect and the dosages they would tell him were not all that much off from what ya hear now.. they diffinitely experimented..
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: alnassak on March 15, 2010, 10:06:04 PM
This guy gave me a huge impact. Huge muscle with deep separation.
Sure. Maybe not aesthetic. But he has the serious hardcore muscle.
The guy like this should place high.
Because, above all, Bodybuilding is the muscle.

(http://pics.musculardevelopment.com/photos/transferred/Aust-217.jpg)


He looks great here  :o
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: hugestatus on March 16, 2010, 12:18:25 AM
Here he is doing damage against Heath
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: WillGrant on March 16, 2010, 01:43:19 AM
What are those two chaps upto down the back  :-\

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=324351.0;attach=363213;image)
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: skeela on March 16, 2010, 02:27:46 AM
Still waiting for a reply Hellenic.You say I am misinformed well spill it champ I bet you know everything even how he got his Pro card.Lets go big boy.

I'll tell you  how he got his card,he played for germany and won the championship there,so they got him invited to the Arnold Classic last year.

The Germans wanted a signature from the Greeks to say they knew he was playing for Germany.Greece Ifbb wanted a cash reward for the signature.
He turned to the Australians,because he has an Australian passport,and they accepted him straight away.So he played in the Arnold Classic as an Australian knowing he was getting his pro card.
 
It was not gifted as you all think,the germans had worked it out with the officials before hand.
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Quickerblade on March 16, 2010, 04:36:07 AM
why is there plastic on the floor/wall? to avoid fake tan stains?
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: skeela on March 16, 2010, 04:42:36 AM
why is there plastic on the floor/wall? to avoid fake tan stains?


yes,it's hard to clean if you smudge it everywhere
Title: Re: Michael Kefalianos
Post by: Parker on March 16, 2010, 06:58:42 AM
Here he is doing damage against Heath
Actually, no he's not. Pgil has more thickness. And Mike's detail starts to wash out mid back. The way he held that pose gives a illusion of back asymmetry, a la Alex Federov. Dude is ripped, but he has no flow, just a jumble of bodyparts.