Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: just_a_pilgrim on March 24, 2010, 11:11:05 PM

Title: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on March 24, 2010, 11:11:05 PM
Worse than The Situation's big armed body

(http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/the-horrors.jpg)
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: geneticmarvel on March 24, 2010, 11:15:24 PM
synthol is for losers
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: mossel on March 25, 2010, 12:28:16 AM
synthol saved bodybuilding!!!
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: webcake on March 25, 2010, 12:29:50 AM
synthol is the shit!

Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: Nomad_Warrior on March 25, 2010, 01:14:14 AM
^ hahahaha LMFAO. I can't believe how delisional some people are!
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: mossel on March 25, 2010, 02:29:47 AM
(http://www.crazymuscle.com/images/SyntholEsik-Clean.jpg)
(http://www.gettingpumped.com/wp-content/uploads//synthol_dickhead.jpg)
(http://fernandotrainer.zip.net/images/synt1.jpg)
(http://realclearfit.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/synthol3.jpg)


Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: _bruce_ on March 25, 2010, 03:22:18 AM
synthol is the shit!



Funniest of the lot
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: Top Dog on March 25, 2010, 08:54:33 AM
I don't get it.......do these guys think that people are confusing that for muscle?  It looks like a mixture of fat and fluids.
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 09:06:32 AM
(http://www.artsyspot.com/img/weird/synthol-victims/synthol-victims37.jpg)

(http://www.artsyspot.com/img/weird/synthol-victims/synthol-victims36.jpg)

(http://www.artsyspot.com/img/weird/synthol-victims/synthol-victims46.jpg)

(http://www.artsyspot.com/img/weird/synthol-victims/synthol-victims34.jpg)

(http://www.artsyspot.com/img/weird/synthol-victims/synthol-victims52.jpg)

its laughable that nasser critisizes other's alleged synthol use....his shoulders just became a joke in his later years (flex was right there with em' though)
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: Top Dog on March 25, 2010, 09:25:47 AM
I love the old guy in the blue shirt and baseball cap above and his goofy looking buddy.
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: FREAKgeek on March 25, 2010, 09:32:53 AM
They have that show on vid:



lol
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: emn1964 on March 25, 2010, 09:41:39 AM
is there an example of "Good" Synthol Use?
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: Natural Man on March 25, 2010, 09:43:02 AM
They have that show on vid:



lol
at 3:00 i felt like killing myself just for watching that shit.
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on March 25, 2010, 09:43:46 AM
Can't believe you forgot this douche.

Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: slate on March 25, 2010, 04:34:17 PM
synthol-filled muscles are as natural or un-natural as muscles derived from the intensive usage use of steroids, HGH, insulin, IGF-1, etc etc

For a bodybuilder the difference is obvious but for a "civilian" it all looks the same. The yuck factor is the same- don't fool urselves-  and they are mostly right, I mean some people shoot oil directly into muscles, others go through the rigmarole of shoting  a ton of diff drugs to get muscle tissue to grow in those muscles, but they are basically as artificial as one another . Only bodybuilders can t  notice the similarities-, civilians with their untrained eye see through the bullshit of fake muscles- they re fake if they are made of oil  and they are fake if they are the product of all kinds of muscle-building drugs and which will disappear after some months if that crap got out of the system

who is fooling who?
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 25, 2010, 04:45:37 PM
synthol-filled muscles are as natural or un-natural as muscles derived from the intensive usage use of steroids, HGH, insulin, IGF-1, etc etc

For a bodybuilder the difference is obvious but for a "civilian" it all looks the same. The yuck factor is the same- don't fool urselves-  and they are mostly right, I mean some people shoot oil directly into muscles, others go through the rigmarole of shoting  a ton of diff drugs to get muscle tissue to grow in those muscles, but they are basically as artificial as one another . Only bodybuilders can t  notice the similarities-, civilians with their untrained eye see through the bullshit of fake muscles- they re fake if they are made of oil  and they are fake if they are the product of all kinds of muscle-building drugs and which will disappear after some months if that crap got out of the system

who is fooling who?


just cause the general public is not intelligent enough understand the differnce between two things; does not mean there is not a HUGE difference.  the general masses are ignorant to many many things going on in the world.....does not mean they are unimportant
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: slate on March 25, 2010, 04:50:00 PM
i think u missed my point- are they really  that different??
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: tonymctones on March 25, 2010, 04:50:27 PM
synthol-filled muscles are as natural or un-natural as muscles derived from the intensive usage use of steroids, HGH, insulin, IGF-1, etc etc

For a bodybuilder the difference is obvious but for a "civilian" it all looks the same. The yuck factor is the same- don't fool urselves-  and they are mostly right, I mean some people shoot oil directly into muscles, others go through the rigmarole of shoting  a ton of diff drugs to get muscle tissue to grow in those muscles, but they are basically as artificial as one another . Only bodybuilders can t  notice the similarities-, civilians with their untrained eye see through the bullshit of fake muscles- they re fake if they are made of oil  and they are fake if they are the product of all kinds of muscle-building drugs and which will disappear after some months if that crap got out of the system

who is fooling who?
does synthol improve strength gains? I dont believe it does and if it doesnt than there is certainly a huge difference
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: slate on March 25, 2010, 05:02:50 PM
come on, everyone knows bbing is not about strength- if u wanna be strong u follow the powerlifting route- BBing is about appearance, not functional muscle- that is why phil heath had an injury while posing, ronnie had to get O2 behind the curtains and dillet had to be carried outa stage like a freaking card board poster after having a whole body cramp
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: TrueGrit on March 25, 2010, 05:15:01 PM
Worse than The Situation's big armed body

(http://cdn.guyism.com/wp-content/uploads/the-horrors.jpg)

That's the famous "synthol dancer"
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: ShipSekki on March 25, 2010, 05:24:13 PM
is there an example of "Good" Synthol Use?

 I'm sure most top level bodybuilders use very small amounts of it here and there.

 Good synthol use is when you can't tell it's been used.
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: slate on March 25, 2010, 05:26:27 PM
according to tonymctones good use is when it gives u strength gains
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: tonymctones on March 25, 2010, 06:31:02 PM
come on, everyone knows bbing is not about strength- if u wanna be strong u follow the powerlifting route- BBing is about appearance, not functional muscle- that is why phil heath had an injury while posing, ronnie had to get O2 behind the curtains and dillet had to be carried outa stage like a freaking card board poster after having a whole body cramp
never said it was brain child, but to say that synthol is the same as hgh or steroids is idiotic...
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: slate on March 25, 2010, 06:48:53 PM
why?

think out of the box (forgive overly used expression, but useful here)

you have two types of "muscle" sizes that can only be attained via "drug" intake , in different forms albeit

Now obviously the guy taking test, slin, HGH etc, goes to the gym and lifts some weights. The synthol guy also goes but does not take the other supps and does not train or diet as hard.

but a true natural (like me) can go to the gym and lift with 5 times more intensity than the drugged up guy and get nowhere the same results. Have u seen the male pros training- the intensity , even weights after a while are  a joke. I see fbbs training and they lift half my poundages and have  more muscle than me and most natural men-

In a weird way -if u dont discount it right away out of digust but actually take sometime to think it over- the all synthol guys are in a way, more genuine.


Now i dont expect u to agree with me but make a small effort to see where i am coming from anyway
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: mossel on March 26, 2010, 12:37:28 AM
synthol hurts!
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: Figo on March 26, 2010, 04:06:43 AM
Can't believe you forgot this douche.



would be interesting to know what the story was with Ernie Taylors tris. Just oil, or scar tissue build-up as well, implants too maybe...

Anyone know the real deal there?
Title: Re: Terrible Synthol use
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on March 26, 2010, 05:25:39 AM
why?

think out of the box (forgive overly used expression, but useful here)

you have two types of "muscle" sizes that can only be attained via "drug" intake , in different forms albeit

Now obviously the guy taking test, slin, HGH etc, goes to the gym and lifts some weights. The synthol guy also goes but does not take the other supps and does not train or diet as hard.

but a true natural (like me) can go to the gym and lift with 5 times more intensity than the drugged up guy and get nowhere the same results. Have u seen the male pros training- the intensity , even weights after a while are  a joke. I see fbbs training and they lift half my poundages and have  more muscle than me and most natural men-

In a weird way -if u dont discount it right away out of digust but actually take sometime to think it over- the all synthol guys are in a way, more genuine.


Now i dont expect u to agree with me but make a small effort to see where i am coming from anyway

How long have you been training? I used to train as heavy as a could to failure which would look more intense than what i do now, which is medium weights, failure, slow movements. Probably doesn't look like much to others but i feel everything on very few sets. Go to failure, lighter weights, slower movements, whatever, after a number of years you feel everything anyway and i'm sure that's what the pro's are doing.