Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Dos Equis on April 07, 2010, 08:24:35 PM
-
This boy needs a beat down. The Mom is right: will be open season on parents if they permit this kind of complaint.
Arkansas teen accuses mom of Facebook harassment
Posted 4/7/2010
By Tom Parsons, Associated Press Writer
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — The mother of a 16-year-old boy said she was only being a good mom when she locked him out of his Facebook account after reading he had driven home at 95 mph one night because he was mad at a girl. His response: a harassment complaint at the local courthouse.
"If I'm found guilty on this it is going to be open season" on parents, Denise New said Wednesday.
New, of Arkadelphia, a small college town an hour southwest of Little Rock, said many of her son's postings didn't reflect well on him, so after he failed to log off the social networking site one day last month, she posted her own items on his account and changed his password to keep him from using it again. But her son claims what she posted wasn't true, and that she's damaging his reputation.
"The things he was posting in Facebook would make any decent parent's eyes pop out and his jaw drop," Denise New said. "He had been warned before about things he had been posting."
Lane New, who lives with his grandmother, filed a complaint with prosecutors who approved a harassment charge March 26. Neither New would say Wednesday which items on his Facebook site the boy had found slanderous.
"I probably made maybe three, maybe four actual postings -- the rest of it was a conversation between my son, me and his personal friends," Denise New said.
In his handwritten complaint to prosecutors, Lane New asked that his mother have no contact with him and wrote, "Denise first hacked my Facebook and changed my password. She also changed the password to my e-mail so I could not change it. She posted things that involve slander and personal facts about my life."
Denise New acknowledged changing both passwords to keep her son from getting access to his Facebook page. She denied hacking into the account.
"He left it logged in on my computer," she said. "It's not like I stole his laptop."
Denise New said the boy had written on his Facebook page that he had gone to Hot Springs one night and drove 95 mph on the way home because he was upset with a girl. Several other posts on his site also bothered her, but she refused to elaborate.
She said he has since opened a new Facebook account.
Prosecutor Todd Turner declined to comment because the boy is a minor. His office issued a statement later saying the woman's alleged statements about her son justified the harassment charge -- though he would not describe the comments.
Denise New said Lane moved in with his grandmother about five years ago, after she went through a difficult divorce, was having mental health problems and didn't feel she could provide her son with the supervision he needed.
She faces a hearing on the misdemeanor at the Clark County Courthouse on May 12.
http://content.usatoday.net/dist/custom/gci/InsidePage.aspx?cId=honoluluadvertiser&sParam=33222677.story
-
Arkansas teen accuses mom of harassment for postings on his Facebook page
Wed Apr 7, 7:32 PM
By Tom Parsons, The Associated Press
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - The mother of a 16-year-old boy said she was only being a good mom when she locked him out of his Facebook account after reading he had driven home at 95 mph (150 kph) one night because he was mad at a girl. His response: a harassment complaint at the local courthouse.
"If I'm found guilty on this it is going to be open season" on parents, Denise New, the mother, said Wednesday.
New said many of her son's postings didn't reflect well on him, so after he failed to log off the social networking site one day last month, she posted her own items on his account and changed his password to keep him from using it again. But her son claims what she posted wasn't true, and she's damaging his reputation.
"The things he was posting in Facebook would make any decent parent's eyes pop out and his jaw drop," Denise New said. "He had been warned before about things he had been posting."
Lane New, who lives with his grandmother, filed a complaint with prosecutors who approved a harassment charge March 26. Neither New would say Wednesday which items on his Facebook site the boy had found slanderous.
"I probably made maybe three, maybe four actual postings - the rest of it was a conversation between my son, me and his personal friends," Denise New said.
In his handwritten complaint to prosecutors, Lane New wrote "Denise first hacked my Facebook and changed my password. She also changed the password to my email so I could not change it. She posted things that involve slander and personal facts about my life."
Denise New acknowledged changing both passwords to keep her son from getting access to his Facebook page. She denied hacking into the account.
"He left it logged in on my computer," she said. "It's not like I stole his laptop."
Denise New said the boy had written on his Facebook page that one night he drove 95 mph (150 kph) on the way home from another town because he was upset with a girl. Several other posts on his site also bothered her, but she refused to elaborate.
She said he has since opened a new Facebook account.
Prosecutor Todd Turner declined to comment on the case because the boy is a minor.
Denise New said Lane moved in with his grandmother about five years ago, after she went through a difficult divorce, was having mental health problems and didn't feel she could provide her son with the supervision he needed.
She faces a hearing on the misdemeanour on May 12.
Good for him! Sometimes, parents do overstep their boundaries.
Just because she pooped him out, doesn't giver the right to humiliate him.
She's not even a custodial parent. I hope the judge tosses the book at her. >:(
-
are you for real?
-
WTF?
........
Really, WTF?
April Fools Jag?
???
-
are you for real?
yes.
Please tell me how her actions were justified or how she was "just being a good mom".
-
yes.
Please tell me how her actions were justified or how she was "just being a good mom".
because i said so
-
because i said so
Seriously... I see no justification or anything to bolster her case of being a good mom.
I do see someone who instead has become a source of embarassment & humiliation for her son.
-
because i said so
Yep. The most powerful words in a parent's arsenal.
-
Yep. The most powerful words in a parent's arsenal.
Retarded....
My Parents explained everything to me. Every decision was accompanied by a "because x.y.z" My mother always hated "because i said so" because she said "how will the kid learn the reasons not to do something and the outcomes?" Because i said so is a lame close minded Cop Out.
-
This boy needs a beat down. The Mom is right: will be open season on parents if they permit this kind of complaint.
Arkansas teen accuses mom of Facebook harassment
Posted 4/7/2010
By Tom Parsons, Associated Press Writer
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — The mother of a 16-year-old boy said she was only being a good mom when she locked him out of his Facebook account after reading he had driven home at 95 mph one night because he was mad at a girl. His response: a harassment complaint at the local courthouse.
"If I'm found guilty on this it is going to be open season" on parents, Denise New said Wednesday.
New, of Arkadelphia, a small college town an hour southwest of Little Rock, said many of her son's postings didn't reflect well on him, so after he failed to log off the social networking site one day last month, she posted her own items on his account and changed his password to keep him from using it again. But her son claims what she posted wasn't true, and that she's damaging his reputation.
"The things he was posting in Facebook would make any decent parent's eyes pop out and his jaw drop," Denise New said. "He had been warned before about things he had been posting."
Lane New, who lives with his grandmother, filed a complaint with prosecutors who approved a harassment charge March 26. Neither New would say Wednesday which items on his Facebook site the boy had found slanderous.
"I probably made maybe three, maybe four actual postings -- the rest of it was a conversation between my son, me and his personal friends," Denise New said.
In his handwritten complaint to prosecutors, Lane New asked that his mother have no contact with him and wrote, "Denise first hacked my Facebook and changed my password. She also changed the password to my e-mail so I could not change it. She posted things that involve slander and personal facts about my life."
Denise New acknowledged changing both passwords to keep her son from getting access to his Facebook page. She denied hacking into the account.
"He left it logged in on my computer," she said. "It's not like I stole his laptop."
Denise New said the boy had written on his Facebook page that he had gone to Hot Springs one night and drove 95 mph on the way home because he was upset with a girl. Several other posts on his site also bothered her, but she refused to elaborate.
She said he has since opened a new Facebook account.
Prosecutor Todd Turner declined to comment because the boy is a minor. His office issued a statement later saying the woman's alleged statements about her son justified the harassment charge -- though he would not describe the comments.
Denise New said Lane moved in with his grandmother about five years ago, after she went through a difficult divorce, was having mental health problems and didn't feel she could provide her son with the supervision he needed.
She faces a hearing on the misdemeanor at the Clark County Courthouse on May 12.
http://content.usatoday.net/dist/custom/gci/InsidePage.aspx?cId=honoluluadvertiser&sParam=33222677.story
Another one of those awkward occasions where I completely agree with beach bum... ;D
-
Retarded....
My Parents explained everything to me. Every decision was accompanied by a "because x.y.z" My mother always hated "because i said so" because she said "how will the kid learn the reasons not to do something and the outcomes?" Because i said so is a lame close minded Cop Out.
That's how my parents did, always explained, never (rarely) hit me...
This kid is an idiot though, and I hope he's laughed out of court...
-
Another joyous result from great American liberism.
Throw the kid into state care, lets see how he fares there if he's too good for momma...
-
Retarded....
My Parents explained everything to me. Every decision was accompanied by a "because x.y.z" My mother always hated "because i said so" because she said "how will the kid learn the reasons not to do something and the outcomes?" Because i said so is a lame close minded Cop Out.
I used to feel the same way until I read what child psychologist John Rosemond had to say. He believes in a "benevolent dictatorship." He talks a lot about the "because I said so" line. He says that almost 100 percent of the time when a kid asks "why" when being ordered to do something, the kid simply wants to argue and isn't really interested in an explanation. I've found that to be absolutely true. That guy is pure gold. I'd recommend him to anyone who has (or is thinking about) kids. Start with John Rosemond's Six Point Plan for Raising Healthy, Happy Children. Great book.
There are some things you need to try and explain, but with others you have to just lay down the law. I think you relax that "rule" as the kid gets older. But parents don't need to argue with their kids.
-
I used to feel the same way until I read what child psychologist John Rosemond had to say. He believes in a "benevolent dictatorship." He talks a lot about the "because I said so" line. He says that almost 100 percent of the time when a kid asks "why" when being ordered to do something, the kid simply wants to argue and isn't really interested in an explanation. I've found that to be absolutely true. That guy is pure gold. I'd recommend him to anyone who has (or is thinking about) kids. Start with John Rosemond's Six Point Plan for Raising Healthy, Happy Children. Great book.
There are some things you need to try and explain, but with others you have to just lay down the law. I think you relax that "rule" as the kid gets older. But parents don't need to argue with their kids.
I guess we are talkin about different ages then. a 16 year old...is not a kid..he needs to know why. I think by the age of 7 Detailed explinations are in order
-
I guess we are talkin about different ages then. a 16 year old...is not a kid..he needs to know why. I think by the age of 7 Detailed explinations are in order
A 16 year old is a kid. Still has no clue what life is all about. Still has a ton of maturing and growing up to do. Much to learn.
I think in the broader sense, everything needs to be explained to a kid regardless of age, but when it comes to day-to-day decisions, you lay down the law. You don't let the tail wag the dog.
-
A 16 year old is a kid. Still has no clue what life is all about. Still has a ton of maturing and growing up to do. Much to learn.
.
how is he to learn if a decision is explained to him as "because i said so" that dosent teach a thing
-
how is he to learn if a decision is explained to him as "because i said so" that dosent teach a thing
The kid learns by the parents establishing rules and guidelines, explaining the purpose of rules and guidelines, enforcing them, and setting a good example. The kid does not learn by arguing with the parent. The kid controls the parent when the parent allows arguments.
"Because I said so" ends unnecessary arguments. You don't need to explain everything to a kid, particularly when you're doing what you believe is in their best interests.
-
So whos in charge when you get smacked in the head with a football?
-
So whos in charge when you get smacked in the head with a football?
Me, because that little maggot has to eventually get in the car and come home. ;D
-
Dunno man... there ain't nowhere on the Oahu that isn't walking distance...
-
Dunno man... there ain't nowhere on the Oahu that isn't walking distance...
Are you kidding? You ever hear of the perimeter run (or ride)? Over 130 miles.
-
how is he to learn if a decision is explained to him as "because i said so" that dosent teach a thing
because I said so is a simplified statement of the event. I'm sure nobody is against teaching why it was wrong. A partent will probably reach saying, "because I said so" after other means are used. If you've explained out the ass why you're not going to let them do something then what's wrong with, because I said so. Because I said so is a concept, not an absolute that only means saying that and nothing else. The parent it responsible. The parent sets the rules. The parent sets consequences for breaking the rules. All these things done right prepare your kid for a society they have to live in with the same rules but even harsher consequences for breaking them. What this mother did to her kid isn't jack shit compared to what he would get most of the time for breaking the law as an adult.
-
That's why you take the H1. straight shot, much better than walking all the way around...
-
That's why you take the H1. straight shot, much better than walking all the way around...
H1 will get you from A to B, but not from C to D, or E to F. That's why we have H2, H3, Farrington Highway, etc.
-
16 year old pissed off kid blazing down the road at high speed, chances of killing one or more people? Probably about the same as firing a gun off in the air in a populated area but only one will be killed by the stray bullet. What this kid did is serious, can't say I blame the mother for being pissed. What would they all being doing now if her kid had killed a family on the road?
-
then it would have been the parents fault.
-
16 year old pissed off kid blazing down the road at high speed, chances of killing one or more people? Probably about the same as firing a gun off in the air in a populated area but only one will be killed by the stray bullet. What this kid did is serious, can't say I blame the mother for being pissed. What would they all being doing now if her kid had killed a family on the road?
Hugo, I totally get that what he did in speeding was wrong. I get that... but what does his driving his car have to do with his Facebook acct. Let the punishment fit the crime... take his car keys away, until he can demonstrate his willingness to drive responsibly... don't hack his Facebook account and change his password. That IS harassment. Furthermore... if he is to be disciplined for any wrongdoing, it sure as heck shouldn't be by her. If she was such a good parent, she wouldn't be his mother in name only. She dumped the kid 5 years ago. she has the title of "mother" for no other reason other than she pooped the kid out of her cooter (Hi Jakey). giving birth doesn't make you a parent, raising the child does. Something she does not do. She pawned him off on his grandmother 5 years ago... and she thinks she can swoop into his life... and hack his accounts and deprive him of their use? Bitch needs to take a chill pill. She has no right to his Facebook account, much less altering his passwords to deprive him of the use of his own account. What she did is harassment. And I betcha granny is backing him all the way. She crossed the line.
-
Hugo, I totally get that what he did in speeding was wrong. I get that... but what does his driving his car have to do with his Facebook acct. Let the punishment fit the crime... take his car keys away, until he can demonstrate his willingness to drive responsibly... don't hack his Facebook account and change his password.
I agree with that.
There is no more damaging thing than to publicly humiliate a teenager, especially if it is his own parents.
I discipline my two teens but I am very careful how I do it and never publicly
-
Hugo, I totally get that what he did in speeding was wrong. I get that... but what does his driving his car have to do with his Facebook acct. Let the punishment fit the crime... take his car keys away, until he can demonstrate his willingness to drive responsibly... don't hack his Facebook account and change his password. That IS harassment. Furthermore... if he is to be disciplined for any wrongdoing, it sure as heck shouldn't be by her. If she was such a good parent, she wouldn't be his mother in name only. She dumped the kid 5 years ago. she has the title of "mother" for no other reason other than she pooped the kid out of her cooter (Hi Jakey). giving birth doesn't make you a parent, raising the child does. Something she does not do. She pawned him off on his grandmother 5 years ago... and she thinks she can swoop into his life... and hack his accounts and deprive him of their use? Bitch needs to take a chill pill. She has no right to his Facebook account, much less altering his passwords to deprive him of the use of his own account. What she did is harassment. And I betcha granny is backing him all the way. She crossed the line.
I'm not saying I would handle it the same way she did. I never said that. On the same hand, I'm not going to tell her how to disipline her kid. I have no idea what they've gone through to this point. I don't see this as crossing the line, sorry. This isn't shit compared to how I and others out west were raised and it did us good.
-
How is the parent to even know if the kid really did it or was just spouting some nonsense for his friends?
Either way, I don't see locking him out of his own facebook account actually teaching him anything, I'd even wager a guess that it's probably against the law to some extent.
-
Oh my god, locking the kid out of a facebook accout, major tragedy ::) He said he did it, speculating on him faking it? Who fucking cares, the mother is in a better place to judge, not us.
-
I guess we are talkin about different ages then. a 16 year old...is not a kid..he needs to know why. I think by the age of 7 Detailed explinations are in order
a 16 yr old is a kid who is tryin test the reins...meaning he wants conflict. And we have clue about her parenting skills, how well he was raised, or where his father is...once you know that, it takes a whole new spin on "Because I said so"
"Because I am your mother and what I say goes in this house"
What if she took away his computer, would that be depriving him, or if he bought his computer, would that be theft?
They have some backwards laws in Arkansas...there basically is no probable cause for harassment as defined by Black's Law dictionary: "a course of conduct directed at a specific person that causes substantial emotional distress in such person and serves no legitimate purpose"
He filed because he was pissed at his mother plain and simple.
-
Oh my god, locking the kid out of a facebook accout, major tragedy ::) He said he did it, speculating on him faking it? Who fucking cares, the mother is in a better place to judge, not us.
That's a big point you missed Hugo. This woman is NOT in a better place to judge. Infact, she has no right to judge. She hasn't lived with him in over 5 years. Those of us in this forum probably know each other better than this woman probably knew him. You're projecting your own relationship with your parents growing up onto their situation. She had as much right to hack his account and deprive him of it, as I do of hacking your Hugo Chavez account, depriving you of it's use, and posting "I Hugo Chavez am a limp dicked prick whose wife cuckolded him, and am now raising someone else's child as a result." ...except in here you are just Hugo Chavez and can easily put it behind you. however, humiliating you like that to all your friends and acquaintances is not easily lived down. what she did is harassment, and she had no right to do it. tHis is not some minor living in her house under her roof. this is a kid who she dumped 5 years ago and who does not even live with her. She has no right to his electronic internet accounts whatsoever, let alone deliberately depriving him of their use or posting things to his account. It's the principal involved.
-
OMG, I knew I didn't want to argue this with you Jag. I had to stop after your second sentence. You're not even a parent, wtf are you doing even commenting? You haven't even experienced the drive a parent feels for their child. You have no concept of the responsibilty. Easy for you to side with a kid. I can't believe you're treating this like the kid is being beaten and locked in a closet or some fucking shit. Clueless....
-
Another joyous result from great American liberism.
Throw the kid into state care, lets see how he fares there if he's too good for momma...
It was decided a long time ago that her mental health issues meant she couldn't be a good parent, and couldn't provide him the guidance he needed. Clearly that still remains the case. He doesn't live with his mother and hasn't for years. he lives with his grandmother, and now wants nothing to do with her, and requesting a restraining order of sorts in order to ensure no contact from her.
What you all fail to realize is this isn't some bleeding heart ACLU case. The town prosecutor felt the harassment charges were merited as a result of what she posted. C'mon... what kind of a parent locks their teenager out of their own Facebook account, as well as email account in order to ensure he will never regain access to his facebook account... then proceeds to not only publicly humiliate him, ...but to also start carrying on conversations with his friends? What if a grown man had done that to his teenaged daughter, then used the account to chat with al her little friends. Would you think it ok then for a creepy old man to post to teenage girls pretending to be a teenage girl?
It won't be open season on parents... it will however make a clear & definitive statement that kids do have rights.
-
OMG, I knew I didn't want to argue this with you Jag. I had to stop after your second sentence. You're not even a parent, wtf are you doing even commenting? You haven't even experienced the drive a parent feels for their child. You have no concept of the responsibilty. Easy for you to side with a kid. I can't believe you're treating this like the kid is being beaten and locked in a closet or some fucking shit. Clueless....
:o Excuse F-ing me Mr. Hugo Chavez who is not really even a president, but has the gall to comment on the actions of Presidents Bush and Obama? When the F**k have you ever hosted a television show on Fox? I guess you aren't qualified to comment on Beck, ...and since you are not and have not ever been a member of congress... you need to zip it there too. ::)
Get over your own parental potential nightmares. She'll be 16 soon enough, no need to spend the next 15 years conjuring up nightmares and loosing your mind as a result. Calm the F down and think about what she did.
Just because one gives birth to someone does not give them leave to do whatever they want, ...especially in this particular case. She was not a custodial parent, she was a womb. no more. Her excuse of doing it because he wrote that he'd been speeding is just that, an excuse... an unjustifiable one. How does hacking his Facebook and changing his passwords to deprive him of his account's use going to teach him about road safety? How does depriving him of his Facebook account and publicly humiliating him and depriving him of the use of his Facebook account, so that the humiliation can live on forever without his ability to remove it... how does that teach hjim about road safety. She's lucky he took it to the courthouse. Most 16 yr old kids I know could do some serious physical damage if they wanted to.
-
OMG, I knew I didn't want to argue this with you Jag. I had to stop after your second sentence. You're not even a parent, wtf are you doing even commenting? You haven't even experienced the drive a parent feels for their child.
A drive so strong she felt the need to publicly slander, harass, and humiliate him to not only his friends, but to the world? :-\ I'm sure most would take a pass on that.
You have no concept of the responsibilty. Easy for you to side with a kid. I can't believe you're treating this like the kid is being beaten and locked in a closet or some fucking shit. Clueless....
Evidently neither does she cause she copped out of that responsibility years ago when he was foisted on his grandmother due to her mental health issues.
PS: That's where you're wrong. I do know the responsibility, and that's why I choose not to have kids.
-
:o Excuse F-ing me Mr. Hugo Chavez who is not really even a president, but has the gall to comment on the actions of Presidents Bush and Obama? When the F**k have you ever hosted a television show on Fox? I guess you aren't qualified to comment on Beck, ...and since you are not and have not ever been a member of congress... you need to zip it there too. ::)
Get over your own parental potential nightmares. She'll be 16 soon enough, no need to spend the next 15 years conjuring up nightmares and loosing your mind as a result. Calm the F down and think about what she did.
Just because one gives birth to someone does not give them leave to do whatever they want, ...especially in this particular case. She was not a custodial parent, she was a womb. no more. Her excuse of doing it because he wrote that he'd been speeding is just that, an excuse... an unjustifiable one. How does hacking his Facebook and changing his passwords to deprive him of his account's use going to teach him about road safety? How does depriving him of his Facebook account and publicly humiliating him and depriving him of the use of his Facebook account, so that the humiliation can live on forever without his ability to remove it... how does that teach hjim about road safety. She's lucky he took it to the courthouse. Most 16 yr old kids I know could do some serious physical damage if they wanted to.
god you're a fucking moron sometimes. All those people and positions you mentioned are either serving us or speaking to us. That has nothing to do with a family, mother and child. When someone is serving the voters we have a right to comment, when someone is talking to the masses, we have a right to comment, when a mother is punishing her kid, I don't give a shit unless the kid is being abused. ::)
-
god you're a fucking moron sometimes. All those people and positions you mentioned are either serving us or speaking to us. That has nothing to do with a family, mother and child. When someone is serving the voters we have a right to comment, when someone is talking to the masses, we have a right to comment, when a mother is punishing her kid, I don't give a shit unless the kid is being abused. ::)
She gave up rights to her kid, and harassment is considered abuse under the law.
-
If you're a complete absentee parent, for 5 years... You pretty much gave up your parental rights I'd say.
Especially when it comes to punishment... It's like walking up to a 5 year old you've never met and spanking them because you think they deserve it.
You are a stranger.
-
If you're a complete absentee parent, for 5 years... You pretty much gave up your parental rights I'd say.
Especially when it comes to punishment... It's like walking up to a 5 year old you've never met and spanking them because you think they deserve it.
You are a stranger.
EXACTLY!!!! Who the heck is she to waltz in 5 yrs later and start making demands, let alone thinking she's entitled to dispense punishment... especially over something she has no idea even occured? now if grandma was disciplining him, it might be a different story, ...but it's not, ...it's the biyotch who dumped him yrs ago. If she didn't want to be a single parent then, ...she doesn't get to be a single parent now. 'sides, what she did wasn't parenting, ...it was malicious harassment.
-
It was decided a long time ago that her mental health issues meant she couldn't be a good parent, and couldn't provide him the guidance he needed. Clearly that still remains the case. He doesn't live with his mother and hasn't for years. he lives with his grandmother, and now wants nothing to do with her, and requesting a restraining order of sorts in order to ensure no contact from her.
What you all fail to realize is this isn't some bleeding heart ACLU case. The town prosecutor felt the harassment charges were merited as a result of what she posted. C'mon... what kind of a parent locks their teenager out of their own Facebook account, as well as email account in order to ensure he will never regain access to his facebook account... then proceeds to not only publicly humiliate him, ...but to also start carrying on conversations with his friends? What if a grown man had done that to his teenaged daughter, then used the account to chat with al her little friends. Would you think it ok then for a creepy old man to post to teenage girls pretending to be a teenage girl?
It won't be open season on parents... it will however make a clear & definitive statement that kids do have rights.
If mental health was a criteria for being allowed to be a parent there would be a whole lot of orphan kids of liberals out there...
Epic faillure at playing the devils advocate.
-
If mental health was a criteria for being allowed to be a parent there would be a whole lot of orphan kids of liberals out there...
Epic faillure at playing the devils advocate.
If I were advocating for the devil, I would have taken her side. ;)
-
Yea, I'm pretty sure the devil iss a woman....
But also pretty sure this isn't 'her'. :)
-
Let's forget the fact she gave birth to this little pussy.
You should be laughed out of court for suing for something facebook related... ::)
-
Let's forget the fact she gave birth to this little pussy.
You should be laughed out of court for suing for something facebook related... ::)
May 12th is coming up pretty shortly. We'll see what transpires then.
-
my piece peace(hahahah how funny is that shit? ;D) offering to ease the tension ;D
as for the public embarrasement/humiliation point...my mother had no problem what so ever punishing me in public or making me apologize to ppl when she felt I had done something wrong. It had nothing not ONE THING to do with embarrasing me or trying to humiliate me it was about teaching me right from wrong and proper respect for others. There isnt anything to point towards this woman trying to humiliate this kid.
Its extremely sad that a mother/son relationship would deteriorate to this point, if I had to guess Id say they both need a good ass kicking.
-
Let's forget the fact she gave birth to this little pussy.
You should be laughed out of court for suing for something facebook related... ::)
Yep.
-
my piece peace(hahahah how funny is that shit? ;D) offering to ease the tension ;D
as for the public embarrasement/humiliation point...my mother had no problem what so ever punishing me in public or making me apologize to ppl when she felt I had done something wrong. It had nothing not ONE THING to do with embarrasing me or trying to humiliate me it was about teaching me right from wrong and proper respect for others.
Your mother was a mother to you. We often put up with behaviour from family that we would never EVER in a million years aceept from anyone else. If a total stranger had tried to do to you what your mother did, would you havve accepted it, or would your reaction be completely different. If your mother slapped you across the face, what would you do? If some chick you'd seen around the hallways at school slapped you across the face... what would you do?
There isnt anything to point towards this woman trying to humiliate this kid.
Evidently the prosecutor thought harassment charges were justified. Stop and think about it for a moment.
16 yr old kids don't vote... parents do. What prosecutor who needs to get re-elected, would file harassment charges against a biological parent unless there was some merit to it? ...May 12th
Its extremely sad that a mother/son relationship would deteriorate to this point, if I had to guess Id say they both need a good ass kicking.
But given what she did, her lackadaisical attitude and refusal to acknowledge let alone take responsibility for her actions... it doesn't surprise me. Why would he need the ass kicking for the deteriorated relationship? She dumped his ass when he was 10 or 11. It wasn't up to him to maintain a healthy relationship with her. At the age of 10, the onus is all on her. If her relationship with her child has deteriorated to such an extent thaat the kid feels the need to go to court to ensure he won't have to have any contact with her...it's all on her!