Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: SF1900 on April 13, 2010, 08:56:49 PM
-
HugeRipped, are my results accurate?
The overall results of our meta-analysis suggest that exercise and physical activity do not result in statistically significant reductions in Hcy. However, from a clinical perspective, our 0.8 μmol/L reduction in Hcy may be important since a 1.0 μmol/L reduction has been shown to reduce the risk of coronary artery disease by 10%. One of the most interesting findings from our meta-analysis was
the fact that the only group in which statistically significant reductions in Hcy occurred was in older, overweight and obese subjects who participated in progressive resistance training. While the authors also found statistically significant reductions in the normal weight group, our weighted results and subsequent 95% confidence intervals did not observe such. Whether our observed changes
were a spurious finding or the result of their body weight, type of exercise intervention, the fact that the subjects had probably been sedentary over a long period of time, or some other factor, is not known. One possible explanation may be related to insulin sensitivity. For example, it has been has suggested that since Hcy clearance can be problematic in overweight and obese subjects, particularly
those with insulin resistance, and that insulin sensitivity is improved as a result of resistance training, such improvements may be associated with greater Hcy clearance. For those who are not insulin resistant, reductions in Hcy may be the result of the preservation of muscle amino acids brought about by concentric contractions causing transitory elevations in insulin levels and
increased protein synthesis. However, further randomized controlled trials on this topic are warranted before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
-
HugeRipped, are my results accurate?
The overall results of our meta-analysis suggest that exercise and physical activity do not result in statistically significant reductions in Hcy. However, from a clinical perspective, our 0.8 μmol/L reduction in Hcy may be important since a 1.0 μmol/L reduction has been shown to reduce the risk of coronary artery disease by 10%. One of the most interesting findings from our meta-analysis was
the fact that the only group in which statistically significant reductions in Hcy occurred was in older, overweight and obese subjects who participated in progressive resistance training. While the authors also found statistically significant reductions in the normal weight group, our weighted results and subsequent 95% confidence intervals did not observe such. Whether our observed changes
were a spurious finding or the result of their body weight, type of exercise intervention, the fact that the subjects had probably been sedentary over a long period of time, or some other factor, is not known. One possible explanation may be related to insulin sensitivity. For example, it has been has suggested that since Hcy clearance can be problematic in overweight and obese subjects, particularly
those with insulin resistance, and that insulin sensitivity is improved as a result of resistance training, such improvements may be associated with greater Hcy clearance. For those who are not insulin resistant, reductions in Hcy may be the result of the preservation of muscle amino acids brought about by concentric contractions causing transitory elevations in insulin levels and
increased protein synthesis. However, further randomized controlled trials on this topic are warranted before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
"Your results?" Why are you attempting to pass off a peer reviewed study from the October 2008 issue of the Journal of Exercise Physiology as your own? If you would like to discuss the results, that is fine, but it is offensive to all exercise scientists and fitness professionals to publically attempt to take credit for the hard work of others in the field.
-
"Your results?" Why are you attempting to pass off a peer reviewed study from the October 2008 issue of the Journal of Exercise Physiology as your own? If you would like to discuss the results, that is fine, but it is offensive to all exercise scientists and fitness professionals to publically attempt to take credit for the hard work of others in the field.
I was involved in the study, they just forgot to add my name.
-
"Your results?" Why are you attempting to pass off a peer reviewed study from the October 2008 issue of the Journal of Exercise Physiology as your own? If you would like to discuss the results, that is fine, but it is offensive to all exercise scientists and fitness professionals to publically attempt to take credit for the hard work of others in the field.
For someone who does this constantly it is easy for you to know where and when these things are printed. You have them memorized
-
For someone who does this constantly it is easy for you to know where and when these things are printed. You have them memorized
What are you insinuating? You can take sentences from any number of my posts on this forum and search them on google.com to test their originality if you so choose. I have never once taken credit for work that is not mine.
-
What are you insinuating? You can take sentences from any number of my posts on this forum and search them on google.com to test their originality if you so choose. I have never once taken credit for work that is not mine.
Hey being a master at cut & paste is something you are truly good at. Keep it up, it fits perfectly with everything you do.,
-
What are you insinuating? You can take sentences from any number of my posts on this forum and search them on google.com to test their originality if you so choose. I have never once taken credit for work that is not mine.
At last you tell the truth that you copy and paste lol
-
I'm caclulating jacked tanedness in tree weeks
Word on the street, and this may not be true, is that you grunt when you get your swole, so everyone can see how jacked and tan you are.
-
I'm caclulating jacked tanedness in tree weeks
Clearly too long Big Dicked.
-
I was involved in the study, they just forgot to add my name.
Just speak with your advisor and have the correction made on the published report. It happens all the time, especially with weaker research groups.