Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Boost on May 07, 2010, 11:02:36 AM

Title: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Boost on May 07, 2010, 11:02:36 AM
Looks great by himself.....

No back, no hamstrings.....

5"4 (wearing lifts)

 :-\
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Wiggs on May 07, 2010, 11:06:01 AM
Toney is raping everyone there.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: disturbia on May 07, 2010, 11:07:01 AM
Toney is raping everyone there.

agreed
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: MAXX on May 07, 2010, 11:08:30 AM
4 midgets and a normal height man
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Mr Nobody on May 07, 2010, 11:09:01 AM
Toney is raping everyone there.
X2
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Schmoe Buster on May 07, 2010, 11:10:11 AM
Toney is raping everyone there.

agreed X2
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Wiggs on May 07, 2010, 11:10:24 AM
4 midgets and a normal height man

6'2 is normal?  What country do you live in?
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: SF1900 on May 07, 2010, 11:11:48 AM
6'2 is normal?  What country do you live in?

I was thinking the same thing lol. I thought 5'9" was normal.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Mr Nobody on May 07, 2010, 11:26:02 AM
I was thinking the same thing lol. I thought 5'9" was normal.
You are correct 5'9" for USA now Mexico could be different.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: phreak on May 07, 2010, 11:29:21 AM
I also thought 6'2"was normal. And it is, depending on ones perspective.

(http://images.thetimes.co.uk/TGD/picture/0,,390375,00.jpg)
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: saopl on May 07, 2010, 11:34:41 AM
imo for any male 6'0 is normal
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Mr Nobody on May 07, 2010, 11:36:07 AM
I also thought 6'2"was normal. And it is, depending on ones perspective.

(http://images.thetimes.co.uk/TGD/picture/0,,390375,00.jpg)
Some tall mofos around here I'm 6'2" in the USA and most of the time I'm taller than most people.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Wiggs on May 07, 2010, 11:41:36 AM
imo for any male 6'0 is normal

In your opinion?  How can you have an opinion on something not subjective?  It's a fact that in the U.S. 5'9 is average.  Average = Normal..
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: G_Thang on May 07, 2010, 11:42:17 AM
I also thought 6'2"was normal. And it is, depending on ones perspective.

(http://images.thetimes.co.uk/TGD/picture/0,,390375,00.jpg)

racist chart.  where the hell are usa mexicans (more of them than blks)?  you're telling me they are under 67ins avg?
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Wiggs on May 07, 2010, 11:46:27 AM
racist chart.  where the hell are usa mexicans (more of them than blks)?  you're telling me they are under 67ins avg?

5'1 ;D
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: saopl on May 07, 2010, 11:49:04 AM
In your opinion?  How can you have an opinion on something not subjective?  It's a fact that in the U.S. 5'9 is average.  Average = Normal..

it's subjective based on who i've come into contact with and the area i live in, also based on female preference, 6'0 SHOULD be average/normal etc.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Norbert on May 07, 2010, 11:53:09 AM
Toney is raping everyone there.

The Huge Ary@n will show Freeman what thats all about,

its gona be Mississippi burning on a bbing stage  8)
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: ChristopherA on May 07, 2010, 12:02:02 PM
it's subjective based on who i've come into contact with and the area i live in, also based on female preference, 6'0 SHOULD be average/normal etc.
6' is not normal. It's not TALL by any means and of course chicks prefer a taller guy( who wants to go out with a guy barely taller than them) but because they prefer it doesnt mean it's normal.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on May 07, 2010, 12:04:25 PM
6'2 is normal?  What country do you live in?

Well, nobody is going to come up to a guy who is 6'2 and say "damn you're taaall maaaan".  ;D
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: EL Mariachi on May 07, 2010, 12:09:10 PM
where the fuck is wolf? that line up is all chocolate
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: oldman on May 07, 2010, 12:16:27 PM
Roelly still doesnt know how to do a RDB or any back poses, he is a dime a dozen.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: tendonitis on May 07, 2010, 12:23:36 PM
I can't wait to see him next to Wolf and Freeman in New York.
Then all this Roelly nonsense will come to a quick end.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Norbert on May 07, 2010, 12:30:03 PM
A fine example of Wolf showing the ebony midgets who is boss
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Mr Nobody on May 07, 2010, 12:31:43 PM
A fine example of Wolf showing the ebony midgets who is boss
Damn no doubt who is boss right there. :o
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Papper on May 07, 2010, 12:33:31 PM
A fine example of Wolf showing the ebony midgets who is boss

Their heads align just like the above timeline. 1910, 1940 and 1970.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: TRIX on May 07, 2010, 12:35:32 PM
camera angles.. roelly is futher back in all those pics,

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=329964.0;attach=370722;image)
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Norbert on May 07, 2010, 12:41:01 PM
Their heads align just like the above timeline. 1910, 1940 and 1970.

Haha  :D

10/10 for observation!  :)
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: kiwiol on May 07, 2010, 12:45:22 PM
Roelly is another Dennis James with better arms and quads.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: TRIX on May 07, 2010, 12:52:43 PM
(http://www.bodybuildingapplied.com/images/2004olympia/dj2.jpg)

minus the monster GUT :D
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: rccs on May 07, 2010, 12:52:44 PM
That's what happen when an old lady is your trainer...
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: saopl on May 07, 2010, 01:44:11 PM
(http://www.bodybuildingapplied.com/images/2004olympia/dj2.jpg)

minus the monster GUT :D

looking vaso
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: AC Slater on May 07, 2010, 01:48:58 PM
I am 6'2.  In new york, I was one of the tallest people there.  I was well above most of the other men.

Down south where I am from, I am maybe 1-2 inches taller than most men.

Avg height up north = 5'7
Avg height down south = 6'0
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: delta9mda on May 07, 2010, 03:24:28 PM
Toney is raping everyone there.
yes, his quads are the size of rolly's torso.
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Julio Ceasar on May 07, 2010, 03:45:44 PM
Tony train like a pussy, but he doesent look like one!
Title: Re: Roelly looks SMALL in a lineup
Post by: Parker on May 07, 2010, 03:55:46 PM
it's subjective based on who i've come into contact with and the area i live in, also based on female preference, 6'0 SHOULD be average/normal etc.
And according to women you should have 6 figure bank account to go with that 6'0.
Sorry, no thanks, I'll stick to being a black smurf if I have to go on what women think SHOULD be ideal. Look what they done to the fashion industry in terms of female models.