Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Mixed Martial Arts (MMA/UFC) => Topic started by: noworries on May 29, 2010, 10:20:36 PM

Title: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: noworries on May 29, 2010, 10:20:36 PM
How do you guys explain that piece of shit fight card.  Is the UFC going to refund everyone.  For the biggest fight in UFC history as it was called it sucked the worse.    You would think the #1 fight organization could put together something exciting if they are going to call it the best in UFC history.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: George Whorewell on May 29, 2010, 10:30:50 PM
LOL I agree 100%

What a piece of shit PPV. Diego Sanchez is a joke. Little Nog is a can. Mike Russow should have gastric bypass surgery performed. Michael the bicycle seat sniffer Bisping throws strikes like a "Rockem sockem Robot" wearing cement shoes. Rashad is a panzy and Rampage looked like he just stepped off a leisure cruise and ended up in the Octagon by accident.

A brutal rip off overall-- The UFC needs to do 6 shows a year and have the cards stacked with good matchups.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: claymore on May 29, 2010, 10:52:52 PM
That was ABSOLUTELY the worst UFC event I've ever seen.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: tonymctones on May 30, 2010, 01:03:27 AM
LMAO ive said this about the UFC for years now...you cant put on fights as often as they do and continue to put up quality fighters to fight it just isnt possible...sadly enough the majority of ppl dont really care about the technical aspect of fights they just want to see someone get the shit beat out of them
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: noworries on May 30, 2010, 07:38:08 AM
The only good thing is I saw it for free.  I would be so pissed off if I paid for that.  where the hell is Mindspin now.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: chaos on May 30, 2010, 07:58:50 AM
where the hell is Mindspin now.
Laughing his ass off with his cut of the profits.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: gmflex on May 30, 2010, 08:35:00 AM
Bump for UFC guy response... ;D
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: FREAKgeek on May 30, 2010, 09:56:52 AM
Both Mindspin and Weight have been inactive since Thursday, hmmmm.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: Fury on May 30, 2010, 10:28:34 AM
Both Mindspin and Weight have been inactive since Thursday, hmmmm.

Haha, as if it wasn't clear enough that they were the same person. The owning is on Mindspin as he proved that he knows next to nothing about MMA with the responses on his WeightPSHR account. And he's mod of this board for what reason?

40 years old and running gimmick accounts. What a sorry individual.  :-\



As for the card, it was yet another horrendous UFC card. Hyped up by the UFC propaganda machine and once again it lets down. Trash.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on May 30, 2010, 12:35:42 PM
Shit card, even with the so called "big names" on the card it was still 2nd place to watching grass grow.  I wish they would have had another cheap shot, or that would have been cool if Phil Baroni would have dropped by and punched a ref again, it would have made it worth the 3 hours of my life i'll never get back.  Rashad wasted his money on that snuggie he bought Rampage that was supposed to keep him warm while he was ko'ed, instead he kept him warm by body heat.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: Fury on May 30, 2010, 01:12:41 PM
It's sad, really. I can't think of the last epic UFC card.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: AC Slater on May 30, 2010, 04:15:37 PM
shit card all the way.  i called it a week ago.

and lol at weightphsr and cockspin both being innactive since thursday  ;D
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: noworries on May 30, 2010, 09:26:44 PM
shit card all the way.  i called it a week ago.

and lol at weightphsr and cockspin both being innactive since thursday  ;D

maybe weightsucker is actually Rampage :D  Mindspin is really his trainer and lover.  you know Mindspin is just asking all his friends what to say to all the crap being thrown at him here.  I can't wait to here what shit spews from him. 

Mindspin:  "Well it made $100,000 in PPV and was seen by 25 more people than Beverly Hillbillies that same time slot.  So the UFC is the best".
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: Thin Lizzy on May 30, 2010, 10:31:38 PM
You really had to hate money to spend it on that card.

Dana & Co. insist on following the WWE model and putting on a PPV every month whether they can provide a good product or not.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: LatsMcGee on May 30, 2010, 10:37:07 PM
Every summer they pump out two PPVs a month now,  I think Forrest getting hurt really messed things up for them. 
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on May 31, 2010, 12:45:51 PM
LOL@This thread....

The event had it's exciting points...not the best ever, but good all around fights.

With that being said, it was without a doubt better then the last two Strikeforce events.

I love seeing you clowns on here put so much effort into your UFC hate.

You know you are on top when the hate keeps rolling in ;D
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: George Whorewell on May 31, 2010, 01:34:38 PM
Weight cmon dude- The card was complete shit. If you can't acknowledge that then you are nothing more than what everyone around here calls you- a UFC apologist ball hugger. The last 2 SF events were as good and they were both free.

Something has to give. Either less PPV events, cheaper prices, or better fights. Hopefully all 3.

Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on May 31, 2010, 01:56:33 PM
Weight cmon dude- The card was complete shit. If you can't acknowledge that then you are nothing more than what everyone around here calls you- a UFC apologist ball hugger. The last 2 SF events were as good and they were both free.

Something has to give. Either less PPV events, cheaper prices, or better fights. Hopefully all 3.



Why was it complete shit? Because there were decisions? Because the Rashad/Rampage fight wasn't what you expected?
I am not saying it was the best ever, but calling it a waste of time is just as ridiculous.

The UFC puts on the best matchups. Don't buy them if you don't want to lose your money. It's your choice.
If you want to steal them online you can do that too.

Just look at the big picture here...nobody put on anything better. The more MMA events the better.
As long as the events don't end in a thuggish brawl or make the sport look bad.

Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: George Whorewell on May 31, 2010, 02:06:15 PM
LMAOOOO are you fucking serious?

That little Nog fight was an embarassment to the UFC. A one dimensonal journeyman nobody takes the fight on a couple weeks notice, obviously wins the fight against a slow and clueless favorite and then doesn't get the decision.

That Duffy Russow fight was as bad a fight as I have ever seen in any kind of organized fighting. Duffy pounded on that fat slob for 2.5 rounds like a punching bag, before gassing and getting ko'd on what looked like a love tap to the temple.

The Bisping fight was a complete joke. Watching him throw startch stiff strikes and moving around like he has a stick up his ass while beating on an outmatched chump for 3 rounds was nothing short of pathetic. Of course, he took no risks in the fight so he couldn't finish.

And then the main event which was the most dissipointing fight I have seen in a long time. Rashad vowed to KO Rampage and instead dry humped him for 3 rounds and won a complete bore of a decision.

It was a horrible, horrible, horrible card and a complete rip off.

Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on May 31, 2010, 02:32:32 PM
LMAOOOO are you fucking serious?

That little Nog fight was an embarassment to the UFC. A one dimensonal journeyman nobody takes the fight on a couple weeks notice, obviously wins the fight against a slow and clueless favorite and then doesn't get the decision.

That Duffy Russow fight was as bad a fight as I have ever seen in any kind of organized fighting. Duffy pounded on that fat slob for 2.5 rounds like a punching bag, before gassing and getting ko'd on what looked like a love tap to the temple.

The Bisping fight was a complete joke. Watching him throw startch stiff strikes and moving around like he has a stick up his ass while beating on an outmatched chump for 3 rounds was nothing short of pathetic. Of course, he took no risks in the fight so he couldn't finish.

And then the main event which was the most dissipointing fight I have seen in a long time. Rashad vowed to KO Rampage and instead dry humped him for 3 rounds and won a complete bore of a decision.

It was a horrible, horrible, horrible card and a complete rip off.



Write a letter to the UFC. Maybe they  care
 enough to listen to you. Otherwise stop watching and just tune into something better. Not being a dick here, you just fail to realize that not every event is going to be the best ever. You act like I am saying this event was the best ever....
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: gmflex on May 31, 2010, 04:06:26 PM
your full of yourself weight  ;D
it was a shitty event..
you don't have to be a UFC guy all the time  ::)
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: George Whorewell on May 31, 2010, 04:12:21 PM
LOL@This thread....

The event had it's exciting points...not the best ever, but good all around fights.

With that being said, it was without a doubt better then the last two Strikeforce events.

I love seeing you clowns on here put so much effort into your UFC hate.

You know you are on top when the hate keeps rolling in ;D

To use the words "Good All Around Fights" to describe that bowl of Diarhea the UFC just put on is nothing short of delusional. And yes, both of the last SF events were better.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on May 31, 2010, 07:54:47 PM
So the majority of the usual posters on this board can agree that this weekends UFC was a bag of shit (with the exception of the obvious delusional TUF fanboy WeightPSHR/Mindspin).  It should have just been called UFC 114: Wall n Stall.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: AC Slater on May 31, 2010, 10:11:05 PM
The only big name fight was rashad vs rampage, and that fight sucked.

All the other fights were no namers. 

Come on weight, just admit the card sucked ass.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: MindSpin on June 01, 2010, 09:09:08 AM
STFU all of you complaining little twats.  It was a better card than any other organization has put on all year.  If you don't like the UFC, stick to your amazing StrikeForce or Dream cards ::)
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 02, 2010, 06:55:48 AM
So the majority of the usual posters on this board can agree that this weekends UFC was a bag of shit (with the exception of the obvious delusional TUF fanboy WeightPSHR/Mindspin).  It should have just been called UFC 114: Wall n Stall.

Are you going to watch UFC 115? or are you going to sit it out in protest?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: George Whorewell on June 02, 2010, 07:56:28 PM
Party at Weight's house!

June 12th!!!!!

Chuck "The Iceman" Lidell

Versus

Richard "Ace" Franklin

I can't wait to hear how this card was "Good Overall" and how there was no other fight card on June 12th, so everyone should be happy the UFC blessed us with another gem! Besides working for the UFC, weight is also working on a cure for "Aces" receding hair line. Allegedly he's going to show up for the Lidell fight rocking a full Afro. Not only is he an MMA expert, but he has also discovered the cure for male pattern baldness.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on June 02, 2010, 08:05:42 PM
Are you going to watch UFC 115? or are you going to sit it out in protest?

I'll go to a titty bar and catch the fights, that way I have something else to look at if we have another decision riddled yawn fest like the last two.  How bout you?  Are you gonna lube up a baseball bat and sit on it for the main event?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: George Whorewell on June 02, 2010, 08:16:19 PM
I'll go to a titty bar and catch the fights, that way I have something else to look at if we have another decision riddled yawn fest like the last two.  How bout you?  Are you gonna lube up a baseball bat and sit on it for the main event?


LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: Fury on June 02, 2010, 09:00:54 PM
They need to do 4 super cards a year. These are just getting ridiculous now.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 02, 2010, 09:34:55 PM
Party at Weight's house!

June 12th!!!!!

Chuck "The Iceman" Lidell

Versus

Richard "Ace" Franklin

I can't wait to hear how this card was "Good Overall" and how there was no other fight card on June 12th, so everyone should be happy the UFC blessed us with another gem! Besides working for the UFC, weight is also working on a cure for "Aces" receding hair line. Allegedly he's going to show up for the Lidell fight rocking a full Afro. Not only is he an MMA expert, but he has also discovered the cure for male pattern baldness.

You need to seriously stick to being an internet messsage board bitch. I like a joke/comedy as much as the next guy, but that is not even remotely funny. It also appears that you pay way too much attention the the details of the fighters appearances. You have something to tell us?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 02, 2010, 09:40:04 PM
I'll go to a titty bar and catch the fights, that way I have something else to look at if we have another decision riddled yawn fest like the last two.  How bout you?  Are you gonna lube up a baseball bat and sit on it for the main event?

Why in the world would I do something like that. Where would you come up with an idea like that? You'boys' in Texas must do things much different. Do you have something to tell us too? It would most likely explain all the dick n ball talk you always use.

We all know you don't care about looking at titty's do?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: FREAKgeek on June 03, 2010, 04:32:47 AM
Weight can't call Chuck Liddell washed up cause he's still in the UFC
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: RancherRanger on June 03, 2010, 04:53:18 AM
I use to watch every UFC ppv.  Around UFC 90 I quit doing that.  I probably watch 2 ppv's a year and then try to find the videos of some of the fights online.  The UFC doesn't have enough talent to have ppv's every month.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 06:20:18 AM
Weight can't call Chuck Liddell washed up cause he's still in the UFC

Is Chuck fighting a guy that is #1 ranked to help the #1 guy pad his rankings?

Pears and Carrots my friend.



Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 06:22:09 AM
I use to watch every UFC ppv.  Around UFC 90 I quit doing that.  I probably watch 2 ppv's a year and then try to find the videos of some of the fights online.  The UFC doesn't have enough talent to have ppv's every month.

I truly think most of you guy are finding fault with the UFC because you don't have the money for the PPV's.

Just being honest here.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: George Whorewell on June 03, 2010, 06:23:43 AM
You need to seriously stick to being an internet messsage board bitch. I like a joke/comedy as much as the next guy, but that is not even remotely funny. It also appears that you pay way too much attention the the details of the fighters appearances. You have something to tell us?


Meltdown.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 06:27:17 AM

Meltdown.



Did I touch a nerve? Most likely everyone around you already knows. Your only hiding it from yourself.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: FREAKgeek on June 03, 2010, 06:32:37 AM
Is Chuck fighting a guy that is #1 ranked to help the #1 guy pad his rankings?

Pears and Carrots my friend.


It's the same with Randy Couture. He's 46 years old yet he can still hang in the UFC. If he was in Strikeforce, you'd be all over his ass on how he's washed up and worthless. Oh I forgot, Randy is still viable cause he beat Marc Coleman, another non washed up fighter.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: George Whorewell on June 03, 2010, 06:43:01 AM


Did I touch a nerve? Most likely everyone around you already knows. Your only hiding it from yourself.


LOL right... It seems I touched a nerve being that you took 11 seconds to respond to my last posting. ::) I think that the abuse you are taking around here over your MS gimmick and your UFC fandom is starting to get to your head. Log off with your gimmick and watch some of your vhs recordings of Chuck Lidell on dancing with the stars. You can even dance in your parents living room by yourself and pretend your with Chuck. Dance until the bad, mean people on the message board can't hurt you anymore.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: K-1 on June 03, 2010, 06:52:38 AM
WWE UFC 115 next week? Cranking them out huh dana?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 07:01:38 AM
LOL right... It seems I touched a nerve being that you took 11 seconds to respond to my last posting. ::) I think that the abuse you are taking around here over your MS gimmick and your UFC fandom is starting to get to your head. Log off with your gimmick and watch some of your vhs recordings of Chuck Lidell on dancing with the stars. You can even dance in your parents living room by yourself and pretend your with Chuck. Dance until the bad, mean people on the message board can't hurt you anymore.

It must really bother you that the UFC is so successful. Just think, they have a PPV event on 6/12, and a FREE one on 6/19, a PPV on 7/3 and another Free one 8/1.

Somebody is watching aren't they?

Then you have you clowns on here that keep saying they put in too many shows, oversaturated, etc.

Hmm...numbers speak for themselves.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 07:05:08 AM
It's the same with Randy Couture. He's 46 years old yet he can still hang in the UFC. If he was in Strikeforce, you'd be all over his ass on how he's washed up and worthless. Oh I forgot, Randy is still viable cause he beat Marc Coleman, another non washed up fighter.

Skewing the truth once again.

Fedor fighting UFC rejects past their prime to 'validate' his number one status is what I always refer to.

That being said, if Randy did leave the UFC, I 1000000% guarantee that Strikeforce and Fedor would set up a fight with him. This is the type of fight Fedor is looking for. Big names, lower risk=padded fraudulent record.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 07:13:59 AM
WWE UFC 115 next week? Cranking them out huh dana?

As long as people are watching.

Listen to you chumps on here....you are complaining about there being too much MMA.

Really....
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: K-1 on June 03, 2010, 08:19:18 AM
Asd long as people are watching.

Listen to you chumps on here....you are complaining about there being too much MMA.

Really....

quantity over quality waters down any product fast. Especially when it's a combat sport and there are dollars involved.

I bet if strikeforce put on a show on CBS every month for free on open circuit tv , you'd knock them and their product and how they are inferior to the UFC , will soon go under and so on. You wouldn't be using the "I'm just happy mma is on tv for free" line at all.



 

Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 08:35:48 AM
quantity over quality waters down any product fast. Especially when it's a combat sport and there are dollars involved.

I bet if strikeforce put on a show on CBS every month for free on open circuit tv , you'd knock them and their product and how they are inferior to the UFC , will soon go under and so on. You wouldn't be using the "I'm just happy mma is on tv for free" line at all.


If Strikeforce put on a show every week, that were the amateur style events similar to the ones they have been showing recently, with mediocre fighters and thuggish street brawls, I would say that. You are correct.

But come on, we all know Strikforce could never afford, nor do they have the fight roster to do that. Impossible for them really.
Plus their quality of product sucks. Ratings have shown that.

The UFC has a quality product that sells. Call it watered down or whatever you want. Numbers don't lie. People are watching.

The aspect that you fail to realize is the UFC has a HUGE roster. The UFC is much different and has a different business plan than any other combat sports org we have seen in the past.

You can criticize all you want, but their success trumps any doubt you haters have.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: K-1 on June 03, 2010, 09:08:58 AM
If Strikeforce put on a show every week, that were the amateur style events similar to the ones they have been showing recently, with mediocre fighters and thuggish street brawls, I would say that. You are correct.

But come on, we all know Strikforce could never afford, nor do they have the fight roster to do that. Impossible for them really.
Plus their quality of product sucks. Ratings have shown that.

The UFC has a quality product that sells. Call it watered down or whatever you want. Numbers don't lie. People are watching.

The aspect that you fail to realize is the UFC has a HUGE roster. The UFC is much different and has a different business plan than any other combat sports org we have seen in the past.

You can criticize all you want, but their success trumps any doubt you haters have.

I've already explained ufc business model. It's no different than the wwe minus the pyro techs, which is fine.

Dana and the owners can put on whatever show they want however they want. What you fail to realize is I don't have to appreciate that format and don't have to support it to appreciate the sport as a whole.

You get a group of old school nfl players in a room and they'll tell you they don't even watch the nfl today because of what it's turned into...NOT because they don't like football. They are not considered haters of the nfl

Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 09:29:05 AM
I've already explained ufc business model. It's no different than the wwe minus the pyro techs, which is fine.

Dana and the owners can put on whatever show they want however they want. What you fail to realize is I don't have to appreciate that format and don't have to support it to appreciate the sport as a whole.

You get a group of old school nfl players in a room and they'll tell you they don't even watch the nfl today because of what it's turned into...NOT because they don't like football. They are not considered haters of the nfl



Sounds like you have other issues to deal with then.....

Are you really just mad that your 'hey day' has come and gone and you realize the the once 'niche' sport has grown into this massive talent filled arena that millions of people watch and follow?

It is fine if you don't like the changes, but to sit here and say the UFC sucks and is selling us a watered down product is idiotic.

It is indeed a different product then it was several years ago...but to say it sucks is more a personal issue then anything else.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: AC Slater on June 03, 2010, 09:31:27 AM
once again, weightpshr is all alone defending himself from everyone else on the board.

que his mindspin account to log in any moment and back himself up.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 09:52:39 AM
once again, weightpshr is all alone defending himself from everyone else on the board.

que his mindspin account to log in any moment and back himself up.

You never answered my question.....

Do you ever visit any other MMA boards?
OR is all your time spent discussing posing trunks and male G4P?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: K-1 on June 03, 2010, 09:56:33 AM
Sounds like you have other issues to deal with then.....

Are you really just mad that your 'hey day' has come and gone and you realize the the once 'niche' sport has grown into this massive talent filled arena that millions of people watch and follow?

It is fine if you don't like the changes, but to sit here and say the UFC sucks and is selling us a watered down product is idiotic.

It is indeed a different product then it was several years ago...but to say it sucks is more a personal issue then anything else.

You are biased towards ufc, when I'm not. That is very clear.

 

Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: Fury on June 03, 2010, 10:39:46 AM
Didn't Chuteboxe post numbers a few weeks ago showing that the UFC PPV buys aren't doing anything impressive, and are even falling in some instances. Guess that's what happens when you put on nothing but shitty cards.  ::)
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 11:24:10 AM
You are biased towards ufc, when I'm not. That is very clear.

 

I do like the UFC and I consider them the best MMA org. I also respect the money and effort they have put into the sport. It's sanctioned in most states now and internationally due to their money and efforts.

I also used to like Strikeforce, but once they started to get in over their heads, I was suspicious. With the thuggish brawl that they allowed on national TV really put the nail in the coffin. They put a shit stain on all the hard work the UFC has done to grow the sport.

To be brutally honest, without the UFC, Strikeforce would have never even made it to national TV. Same with all the other defunct orgs like Affliction and EliteXC, etc.

Don't be mad at me for supporting a successful org, just as millions around the world do.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 11:27:46 AM
Didn't Chuteboxe post numbers a few weeks ago showing that the UFC PPV buys aren't doing anything impressive, and are even falling in some instances. Guess that's what happens when you put on nothing but shitty cards.  ::)


Good thing the UFC has built a stable income of more then just PPV buys huh? Even in a rough economy they have prevailed.
Don't forget about all the free shows they put on as well...

You clowns try so hard...but no matter what way you try to spin it, they are running shit in the MMA world. :o
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: AC Slater on June 03, 2010, 01:49:06 PM
You never answered my question.....

Do you ever visit any other MMA boards?
OR is all your time spent discussing posing trunks and male G4P?

i read sherdog occasionally
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 01:56:45 PM
i read sherdog occasionally

Don't take this the wrong way...but do you think your comments on here carry much merrit when you don't research/read CURRENT MMA very often?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: MindSpin on June 03, 2010, 04:57:57 PM
How do you guys explain that piece of shit fight card.  Is the UFC going to refund everyone.  For the biggest fight in UFC history as it was called it sucked the worse.    You would think the #1 fight organization could put together something exciting if they are going to call it the best in UFC history.

I don't understand how you anti-UFC morons say it was a weak card   We got to see Rashad dominate Rampage and survive nearly getting KOd.  We saw what could very well be the best comeback of all time when Todd Duffy got KTFO.  And we saw two virtual unknowns come out of nowhere to defeat established legends in Negera & Sanchez.  Fucking awesome card.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on June 03, 2010, 07:12:09 PM
Don't take this the wrong way...but do you think your comments on here carry much merrit when you don't research/read CURRENT MMA very often?

It's like how your comments don't carry any merrit since you've only followed the sport for a few months via TUF and have never thrown a punch in your enitre life.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on June 03, 2010, 07:18:19 PM
 We saw what could very well be the best comeback of all time when Todd Duffy got KTFO.  And we saw two virtual unknowns come out of nowhere to defeat established legends in Negera & Sanchez.  Fucking awesome card.

Wow, there is so much wrong in this statement.  It's obvious you are biased to the UFC when you buy in to that hype that "that was the best comeback of all time".  If you've followed MMA long enough, you'd know shit like that is pretty frequent.  There's a couple of highlights floating around the net with nothing but comebacks and there's an assload that are just as one sided, and just as good as that one.  Did you just call Diego Sanchez a legend and then hideously butcher the Nogueira name and the fact that he actually "won" his fight.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: K-1 on June 03, 2010, 07:24:59 PM
It's like how your comments don't carry any merrit since you've only followed the sport for a few months via TUF and have never thrown a punch in your enitre life.

he or she does seem to do very well juggling balls I must say. UFC balls to be exact.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: George Whorewell on June 03, 2010, 08:16:44 PM
Wow, there is so much wrong in this statement.  It's obvious you are biased to the UFC when you buy in to that hype that "that was the best comeback of all time".  If you've followed MMA long enough, you'd know shit like that is pretty frequent.  There's a couple of highlights floating around the net with nothing but comebacks and there's an assload that are just as one sided, and just as good as that one.  Did you just call Diego Sanchez a legend and then hideously butcher the Nogueira name and the fact that he actually "won" his fight.

QFT--- Nogueira won, that human blimps comeback was decent-- not even close to the greatest ever; I think Duffy would have fainted from exhaustion either way and Diego Sanchez is a glorified tomato can.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 03, 2010, 09:35:02 PM
And we saw two virtual unknowns come out of nowhere to defeat established legends in Negera & Sanchez.  Fucking awesome card.

The Legendary Diego Sanchez?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 10:42:42 PM
It's like how your comments don't carry any merrit since you've only followed the sport for a few months via TUF and have never thrown a punch in your enitre life.

Are you still angry about the owning I put on you superstar MMA fan?

Is the constant reminder too much to handle for you. Is it even worse for you that your 'lady' took the pic?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 10:44:48 PM
he or she does seem to do very well juggling balls I must say. UFC balls to be exact.


Does it piss you off that the UFC is so successful?

Or is it that life has passed you by, as you admitted earlier?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 03, 2010, 10:46:13 PM
QFT--- Nogueira won, that human blimps comeback was decent-- not even close to the greatest ever; I think Duffy would have fainted from exhaustion either way and Diego Sanchez is a glorified tomato can.

What kind of can are we talking about here....

The ones like Fedor fights, or the one that Fedor is?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: K-1 on June 04, 2010, 06:26:55 AM

Does it piss you off that the UFC is so successful?

Or is it that life has passed you by, as you admitted earlier?


this is proof that you don't have the capacity to understand and distinguish a persons opinion in regards to something as recreational and sport as mma (in this case UFC wwe format). vs Life.

I'll dummy it down for you....I have an opinion about the following at this time: the oil leak in the gulf. This has zero bearing on my life. Just an opinion.

Again this proves you are a) biased towards the UFC and b) Dana tea bags you daily

Just sayin


Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 04, 2010, 06:56:54 AM

this is proof that you don't have the capacity to understand and distinguish a persons opinion in regards to something as recreational and sport as mma (in this case UFC wwe format). vs Life.

I'll dummy it down for you....I have an opinion about the following at this time: the oil leak in the gulf. This has zero bearing on my life. Just an opinion.

Again this proves you are a) biased towards the UFC and b) Dana tea bags you daily

Just sayin



You are sounding more like a bitter old man in every post...now you are talking about the oil leak in the gulf....which by the way WILL have an impact on your life you idiot. Very selfish thing to say, actually.

Now back to MMA. Saying that the UFC is just like WWE is just proving further how much of an old-timer you really are becoming.

WWE is scripted entertainment. Enough said.

If you knew better, you would refrain from Dick N Ball talk....it makes you look as intelligent as all the other chumps on here using it.


Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: K-1 on June 04, 2010, 03:40:06 PM

You are sounding more like a bitter old man in every post...now you are talking about the oil leak in the gulf....which by the way WILL have an impact on your life you idiot. Very selfish thing to say, actually.

Now back to MMA. Saying that the UFC is just like WWE is just proving further how much of an old-timer you really are becoming.

WWE is scripted entertainment. Enough said.

If you knew better, you would refrain from Dick N Ball talk....it makes you look as intelligent as all the other chumps on here using it.




 ::)
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 04, 2010, 04:25:53 PM
::)

I knew that would shut you up :o
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on June 04, 2010, 07:10:23 PM
Are you still angry about the owning I put on you superstar MMA fan?

Is the constant reminder too much to handle for you. Is it even worse for you that your 'lady' took the pic?
\\

I'm honestly glad you're honoring a lost bet that you didn't have the balls to take.  Instead of changing your avatar youve got a picture from my library that you think dosen't exist.  I'm not angry about shit, it seems everytime I pop in here youre being cornered and flamed by what is collectively the majority of the active posters on this board.  All you do is bitch about anything not the UFC and you seem to think that watching TUF for a few months and using sherdog's fight finder gives you enough merit to have an opinion that holds any water. 
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 04, 2010, 07:21:19 PM
\\

I'm honestly glad you're honoring a lost bet that you didn't have the balls to take.  Instead of changing your avatar youve got a picture from my library that you think dosen't exist.  I'm not angry about shit, it seems everytime I pop in here youre being cornered and flamed by what is collectively the majority of the active posters on this board.  All you do is bitch about anything not the UFC and you seem to think that watching TUF for a few months and using sherdog's fight finder gives you enough merit to have an opinion that holds any water. 

Twist it whatever way you want. They don't call you chumpboxe for nothing. That is not just a picture in my avatar, it is a favorite :o
Why didn't you keep posting more from your library? You suddenly stopped? Why?

Post them, we all want to see them, or let me guess, you are training and have to attend a local MMA event this weekend.
Busy chump you are.

Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: K-1 on June 04, 2010, 07:46:29 PM
I knew that would shut you up :o

(http://www.tvgasm.com/shows/GayCalledMotivator.jpg)
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on June 04, 2010, 08:31:24 PM
Twist it whatever way you want. They don't call you chumpboxe for nothing. That is not just a picture in my avatar, it is a favorite :o
Why didn't you keep posting more from your library? You suddenly stopped? Why?

Post them, we all want to see them, or let me guess, you are training and have to attend a local MMA event this weekend.
Busy chump you are.

Why do you keep saying "we" like if mindspin/stoolpshr counts as more than one person?  You have an invisible army of supporters in your delusional TUF fanboy world.  You can tell who really trains on this forum by the way they isolate techniques in their analysis, or opinions, or experiences for that matter.  You have yet to do anything outside of complaining endlessly about strikeforce and blind use of MMA math to support your ignorant and biased TUF assbag disease you suffer from.  You'd think you'd realize by now since the majority of the active posters on this board have spoken out against your bitching and nutthugging at one point or another in the last few days.  
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 04, 2010, 08:45:40 PM
(http://www.tvgasm.com/shows/GayCalledMotivator.jpg)

That's all you got huh?

When you no other rebuttal then this shit it's time to move on chump.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: noworries on June 04, 2010, 09:01:32 PM
That's all you got huh?

When you no other rebuttal then this shit it's time to move on chump.

What shift do you work at the UFC headquarters cleaning the toilets.  Cause your information reeks of bullshit.  Honestly are you retarded or "special" or something. 
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 04, 2010, 09:36:01 PM
What shift do you work at the UFC headquarters cleaning the toilets.  Cause your information reeks of bullshit.  Honestly are you retarded or "special" or something. 

Who cares what I do...If I do/did have a job at the UFC, what is wrong with that?

One thing is certain, you are destined to be a fat ass the rest of your life.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 04, 2010, 09:38:22 PM
Why do you keep saying "we" like if mindspin/stoolpshr counts as more than one person?  You have an invisible army of supporters in your delusional TUF fanboy world.  You can tell who really trains on this forum by the way they isolate techniques in their analysis, or opinions, or experiences for that matter.  You have yet to do anything outside of complaining endlessly about strikeforce and blind use of MMA math to support your ignorant and biased TUF assbag disease you suffer from.  You'd think you'd realize by now since the majority of the active posters on this board have spoken out against your bitching and nutthugging at one point or another in the last few days.  

You failed to answer my question....why did you stop posting your trinkets and pics.

Are you afraid or something?

Are you also telling me that you have to train to be a fan or knowledgeable about the sport?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: K-1 on June 04, 2010, 09:59:02 PM
Why do you keep saying "we" like if mindspin/stoolpshr counts as more than one person?  You have an invisible army of supporters in your delusional TUF fanboy world.  You can tell who really trains on this forum by the way they isolate techniques in their analysis, or opinions, or experiences for that matter.  You have yet to do anything outside of complaining endlessly about strikeforce and blind use of MMA math to support your ignorant and biased TUF assbag disease you suffer from.  You'd think you'd realize by now since the majority of the active posters on this board have spoken out against your bitching and nutthugging at one point or another in the last few days.  

b/c this chump is obviously one in the same...which is absolutely pathetic imo.

wouldn't know a front kick from a push kick (when they are all the same) ..just pathetic. But wants to claim.

cockPSHR YOU ARE MY B*TCH!!!
(http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr227/loopoolie/for%20bulletin%20stuff/paula21.jpg)


Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: benchmstr on June 04, 2010, 10:00:53 PM
b/c this chump is obviously one in the same...which is absolutely pathetic imo.

wouldn't know a front kick from a push kick (when they are all the same) ..just pathetic. But wants to claim.

cockPSHR YOU ARE MY B*TCH!!!
(http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr227/loopoolie/for%20bulletin%20stuff/paula21.jpg)



agreed...

bench
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on June 04, 2010, 10:01:55 PM
You failed to answer my question....why did you stop posting your trinkets and pics.
Are you afraid or something?
Are you also telling me that you have to train to be a fan or knowledgeable about the sport UFC?

I can post a picture of Dana White teabagging you and you'll still deny you love his nuts.  I'm telling you your bitching is one dimensional, there is no depth to your whining.  You spend all of your time on this board poorly  defending yourself against numerous people who are rational enough to see that you're just an ignorant newbie TUF'er.  You don't have to train or be knowledgable about the sport to be a fan, but it does help when you go on a MMA board talking all kinds of shit and instigating arguments that usually end with the majority of the posters on that board cornering you raping you verbally.  Earth to StoolPSHR, no one likes you here.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 04, 2010, 10:02:21 PM
b/c this chump is obviously one in the same...which is absolutely pathetic imo.

wouldn't know a front kick from a push kick (when they are all the same) ..just pathetic. But wants to claim.

cockPSHR YOU ARE MY B*TCH!!!
(http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr227/loopoolie/for%20bulletin%20stuff/paula21.jpg)




I see you are posting your collection tonight...Nice defense old man.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 04, 2010, 10:05:12 PM
I can post a picture of Dana White teabagging you and you'll still deny you love his nuts.  I'm telling you your bitching is one dimensional, there is no depth to your whining.  You spend all of your time on this board poorly  defending yourself against numerous people who are rational enough to see that you're just an ignorant newbie TUF'er.  You don't have to train or be knowledgable about the sport to be a fan, but it does help when you go on a MMA board talking all kinds of shit and instigating arguments that usually end with the majority of the posters on that board cornering you raping you verbally.  Earth to StoolPSHR, no one likes you here.

So where is the rest of your collection.

FYI...I don't look to the internet for approval or friends. I also have no need to brag about any shitty defunct boxing club that I used to train at in Texas :o


Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on June 04, 2010, 10:14:22 PM
So where is the rest of your collection.
FYI...I don't look to the internet for approval or friends. I also have no need to brag about any shitty defunct boxing club that I used to train at in Texas :o

I know it's obvious, your a child molester who's obsessed with Dana White and you get off on starting arguments that end up with you on all fours getting verbally gangbanged.  
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: WeightPSHR on June 04, 2010, 10:23:12 PM
I know it's obvious, your a child molester who's obsessed with Dana White and you get off on starting arguments that end up with you on all fours getting verbally gangbanged.  

Tell us more about your defunct boxing club?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: *ChuteBoxe* on June 05, 2010, 07:45:36 AM
Tell us more about your defunct boxing club?

You know you're getting it balls deep when you're trying that hard to change the subject.  I don't own a boxing club and the one I go to is doin just fine.  Any other acts of subterfuge you want to throw out?
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: noworries on June 05, 2010, 08:56:04 AM
man fudgepacker is getting his ass handed to him in this thread.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: noworries on June 05, 2010, 08:57:14 AM
Who cares what I do...If I do/did have a job at the UFC, what is wrong with that?

One thing is certain, you are destined to be a fat ass the rest of your life.

Again i outed you.
Title: Re: UFC BallHuggers Explain
Post by: AC Slater on June 05, 2010, 09:32:23 AM
he has hardly posted from his cockspin account after being outed