Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Shockwave on June 20, 2010, 11:17:25 AM

Title: Ronnie 98 vs 99 Conditioning
Post by: Shockwave on June 20, 2010, 11:17:25 AM

Check out the hams. Clearly better conditioned/harder/dryer in 98.
Eat shit Hulkster.
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?option=com_joomgallery&func=watermark&catid=4348&id=40807&Itemid=202)
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?option=com_joomgallery&func=watermark&catid=44021&id=45249&Itemid=202)

Title: Re: Ronnie 98 vs 99 Conditioning
Post by: epic_alien on June 20, 2010, 11:22:33 AM

what the fuck is up with flex calves

horrid

Title: Re: Ronnie 98 vs 99 Conditioning
Post by: Shockwave on June 20, 2010, 11:29:03 AM

Cant tell for sure but the waist looks a lot tighter from the back in 98 too.
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?option=com_joomgallery&func=watermark&catid=4348&id=40809&Itemid=202)

Title: Re: Ronnie 98 vs 99 Conditioning
Post by: bigbobs on June 20, 2010, 11:57:26 AM

Very original thread.  I expect there to be many new arguments and photos posted here in response.

Title: Re: Ronnie 98 vs 99 Conditioning
Post by: Shockwave on June 20, 2010, 12:03:11 PM

Quote from: bigbobs on June 20, 2010, 11:57:26 AM

Very original thread.  I expect there to be many new arguments and photos posted here in response.

;D