Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: marty31672 on June 25, 2010, 12:51:41 PM
-
some people were talking about this at work and after much thought i think i found the answer
the answer is that both have to come together
just so you no, an egg has a baby chicken inside of it
also, a chicken has eggs inside the body they only lay them when the eggs are ready to
so the answer is whenever you have one you have the other so its a trick question hehe
-
The Sperm came first ;D
-
some people were talking about this at work and after much thought i think i found the answer
the answer is that both have to come together
just so you no, an egg has a baby chicken inside of it
also, a chicken has eggs inside the body they only lay them when the eggs are ready to
so the answer is whenever you have one you have the other so its a trick question hehe
excellent reasoning.
I have a question for you "marty"....Did you know you were gay....so you knew you would like sucking a mans penis??
Or did you suck a mans penis, and you figured you were gay because you like it so much ??
-
Marty, I have missed you.
Where have you been? :(
-
excellent reasoning.
I have a question for you "marty"....Did you know you were gay....so you knew you would like sucking a mans penis??
Or did you suck a mans penis, and you figured you were gay because you like it so much ??
;D ;D ;D
-
chuck norris
-
some people were talking about this at work and after much thought i think i found the answer
the answer is that both have to come together
just so you no, an egg has a baby chicken inside of it
also, a chicken has eggs inside the body they only lay them when the eggs are ready to
so the answer is whenever you have one you have the other so its a trick question hehe
Awesome post!
-
Just so I "no" huh?...... ;D
-
The chicken
-
The chicken
An egg can’t lay itself.
-
An egg can’t lay itself.
:)
-
(http://www.viceland.com/blogs/at/files/2009/12/dildo-dog.jpg)
-
Gonzo the great molests chickens
-
im singing Sinatra into my skype microphone
-
Gonzo the great molests chickens
hey >:(
-
(http://www.viceland.com/blogs/at/files/2009/12/dildo-dog.jpg)
HAHA. Now that's one Thanksgiving you won't forget. Good girl! :)
-
both the chicken and the egg came into existence over time, together. slow gradual changes due to environmental conditions which caused natural selection to select the organisms that became closer and closer to the chicken/egg we see today.
-
The egg.
-
wasnt there a scientific article that came out a few months ago that said for sure which came first? I saw it on yahoo homepage
I think it was the chicken
-
Have you ever asked your wife who came first?
-
is everyone else too lazy??? ;D
The Theory of Evolution states that species change over time via mutation and selection. Since DNA can be modified only before birth, a mutation must have taken place at conception or within an egg such that an animal similar to a chicken, but not a chicken, laid the first chicken egg.[8][9] In this light, both the egg and the chicken evolved simultaneously from birds that were not chickens and did not lay chicken eggs but gradually became more and more like chickens over time.
However, a mutation in one individual is not normally considered a new species. A speciation event involves the separation of one population from its parent population, so that interbreeding ceases; this is the process whereby domesticated animals are genetically separated from their wild forebears. The whole separated group can then be recognized as a new species.
The modern chicken was believed to have descended from another closely related species of birds, the red junglefowl, but recently discovered genetic evidence suggests that the modern domestic chicken is a hybrid descendant of both the red junglefowl and the grey junglefowl.[10] Assuming the evidence bears out, a hybrid is a compelling scenario that the chicken egg, based on the second definition, came before the chicken.
i would point out that this doesnt account for the egg laying species that pre-dated the chicken, and whether it came before the egg or its egg came before it.
my original answer in this thread, that they slowly evolved together over time, is (i think) correct. no other way for complex things to come into existence within the laws of this universe.
-
Eggs are the orgasm of a chicken's life
-
see tbombz answer.
and for the record marty is a gimmic or a complete retard.
-
is everyone else too lazy??? ;D
The Theory of Evolution states that species change over time via mutation and selection. Since DNA can be modified only before birth, a mutation must have taken place at conception or within an egg such that an animal similar to a chicken, but not a chicken, laid the first chicken egg.[8][9] In this light, both the egg and the chicken evolved simultaneously from birds that were not chickens and did not lay chicken eggs but gradually became more and more like chickens over time.
However, a mutation in one individual is not normally considered a new species. A speciation event involves the separation of one population from its parent population, so that interbreeding ceases; this is the process whereby domesticated animals are genetically separated from their wild forebears. The whole separated group can then be recognized as a new species.
The modern chicken was believed to have descended from another closely related species of birds, the red junglefowl, but recently discovered genetic evidence suggests that the modern domestic chicken is a hybrid descendant of both the red junglefowl and the grey junglefowl.[10] Assuming the evidence bears out, a hybrid is a compelling scenario that the chicken egg, based on the second definition, came before the chicken.
i would point out that this doesnt account for the egg laying species that pre-dated the chicken, and whether it came before the egg or its egg came before it.
my original answer in this thread, that they slowly evolved together over time, is (i think) correct. no other way for complex things to come into existence within the laws of this universe.
Hmm...
-
Hmm...
care to share the thoughts behind it ??
-
care to share the thoughts behind it ??
Nah, just pondering it - it's a good theory that's all and probably the most plausible I've heard to date.
A decent find. 8)
-
Nah, just pondering it - it's a good theory that's all and probably the most plausible I've heard to date.
A decent find. 8)
cool. glad i can inspire thought!
within the laws that govern our universe (physics), living things (complex combinations of matter that reproduce and have some form of intelligence) have to be slowly built up over time, through a process of material evolution.
-
Nah, just pondering it - it's a good theory that's all and probably the most plausible I've heard to date.
A decent find. 8)
you sound like you never heard of it before. the theory of evolution is the most accepted theory and should be common knowlage by now.
can't expect much from the getbig crowd i guess :P
-
you sound like you never heard of it before. the theory of evolution is the most accepted theory and should be common knowlage by now.
can't expect much from the getbig crowd i guess :P
theres a difference between
knowing about the theory of evolution
and
knowing about the theory of evolution and how it relates to natural selection and genetic mutations and the development of species over time
also... evolution is a scientific fact (lets not get into the impossibility of knowledge and the denial of fact because that conversation leads no where - literally ;) )
but evolution doesnt explain for the existence of matter it itself
which is really what the "chicken or egg" question is all about anyways
-
evolution is a scientific fact (lets not get into the impossibility of knowledge and the denial of fact because that conversation leads no where - literally ;) )
bombz do you have a link to macro evolution being fact?
From what did circus peanuts evolve :P ;D
-
bombz do you have a link to macro evolution being fact?
From what did circus peanuts evolve :P ;D
stella your question reminds me of immanuel kant, who advised Religious groups against fighting science, for he knew they would lose.
and that advice from immanuel kant reminds me of the theologian philosopher augustine(?) who said "first you must believe, then you can understand"
:)