Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Positive Bodybuilding Discussion & Talk => Topic started by: tallandfat on July 08, 2010, 04:48:31 PM
-
anyone?
-
yea...there was a legend on here named pumpster that it worked great for...
-
I used HIT in the mid 90s......for a few years.......and yes......I did grow from that routine.
I must say though that after a while the body shuts down......and needs some time away.....that is when I added a few more sets to the routine......I never did high volume.......probably in the neighborhood of 10-12 sets for larger muscles and 8-9 for smaller muscles.
I did go as low as 6 sets for chest and back and legs......but only for a short time......normally I was closer to 10 sets.....HIT works but for a rather short period of time.....IMHO
On the other hand.....I have never trained with extremely high volume.....say 20-30 sets......that is just too overboard. You will benefit from more moderate volume. My .02 on the matter.
-
Didn't really work for me - pity, cos I spent the better part of 10 years doing it. Then moved onto higher volume training and that seems to have been a bit more successful.
-
i do think it works, your form and feeling for the movements has to be perfect tho,,,,
much easier and probly better to take the middle road tho.
-
did dorians version of hit for a couple of years,and it seemed to work ok,just got bored with it.
-
dogcrapp is keeps you motivated to beat your numbers every week. i tried it for a while and got good results
-
For a couple weeks about 6-7 years ago I did Tabata (1-2x a week). It killed me; however, my measurements got significantly bigger in my chest, arms, and legs.
I will never forget the pain and throwing up but the effectiveness cannot be argued.
-
I tried HIT about 10 years ago.
I followed Mentzer's program to the tee even spoke with him a couple of times about the program for some advice.
I did not have very good results, didn't lose anything but no real gains to speak of other than in the log book.
In theory I believe it works and still follow some of the principles to this day (but more of a Yates style program)...I don't think the average lifter can do a HIT program bc they simply can not muster enough intensity without a few warm ups.
-
Did it for awhile. Yates style. It was ok. Didn't get any super gains from it.
Poliquin wrote a fairly good article and had a suggestion for those wanting to do HIT.
You can google Poliquin and HIT, probably will find it that way.
But it was basically a setup where you would first do around 6 weeks of high volume bodybuilding training, old school. Followed by 6 weeks of HIT. Followed by 6 weeks of German Volume Training. And followed by Max-OT or similar.
Basically, the point Poliquin was trying to get across I guess, is that HIT works very well if you switch to it from a higher volume protocol.
The gains you get is not from previously being "overtrained". But rather from the de-loading, tapering.
But you still need to put in volume training to get results.