Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on July 09, 2010, 07:31:34 AM
-
US Justice Department to review BART shooting.
Updated at 06:44 AM todayRelated VideoAll Live Video : All Video » Courtroom reaction to Mehserle verdict
LOS ANGELES -- The U.S. Department of Justice will conduct an independent review of the Johannes Mehserle case in order to determine whether or not the shooting merits federal prosecution, according the department.
Johannes Mehserle trial
"The Justice Department has been closely monitoring the state's investigation and prosecution," the department said in a statement.
"The Civil Rights Division, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the FBI have an open investigation into the fatal shooting and, at the conclusion of the state's prosecution, will conduct an independent review of the facts and circumstances to determine whether the evidence warrants federal prosecution."
Congresswoman Barbara Lee, D-Oakland, said she has been in touch with the justice department.
"I remain in close contact with the Department of Justice and will continue to work with them, the family and the community in the days ahead," she said in a statement.
The statement also addressed local reactions to the Mehserle verdict.
"Understandably there is grave concern in the community," Lee said. "However, during this time our city must come together peacefully so that we can begin to heal."
Lee said she stands with Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums, the City Council and community leaders in supporting people who want to express themselves.
uReport:
Take part in the news. Send videos and photos to uReport@kgo-tv.com, or visit uReport.abc7news.com.
Stay with ABC7NEWS.COM for more on this developing story throughout the day.
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news%2Flocal%2Feast_bay&id=7545102
________________________ ________________________ ________
WWWTTFFF????
This guy was tried by a jury of his peers.
And the DOJ won't go after the obvious crime in the black panther mess.
-
What "Black Panther mess" are you talking about?
-
What "Black Panther mess" are you talking about?
-
Blacks can't be racist.
-
Just keep it up. They have never seen white people riot and it will not be a pretty picture. Even some blacks know this.
-
Every single buddy of mine in the last two years have gone for their CCW and bought AR's, Shotguns, etc.
-
US Justice Department to review BART shooting.
Updated at 06:44 AM todayRelated VideoAll Live Video : All Video » Courtroom reaction to Mehserle verdict
LOS ANGELES -- The U.S. Department of Justice will conduct an independent review of the Johannes Mehserle case in order to determine whether or not the shooting merits federal prosecution, according the department.
Johannes Mehserle trial
"The Justice Department has been closely monitoring the state's investigation and prosecution," the department said in a statement.
"The Civil Rights Division, the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the FBI have an open investigation into the fatal shooting and, at the conclusion of the state's prosecution, will conduct an independent review of the facts and circumstances to determine whether the evidence warrants federal prosecution."
Congresswoman Barbara Lee, D-Oakland, said she has been in touch with the justice department.
"I remain in close contact with the Department of Justice and will continue to work with them, the family and the community in the days ahead," she said in a statement.
The statement also addressed local reactions to the Mehserle verdict.
"Understandably there is grave concern in the community," Lee said. "However, during this time our city must come together peacefully so that we can begin to heal."
Lee said she stands with Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums, the City Council and community leaders in supporting people who want to express themselves.
uReport:
Take part in the news. Send videos and photos to uReport@kgo-tv.com, or visit uReport.abc7news.com.
Stay with ABC7NEWS.COM for more on this developing story throughout the day.
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news%2Flocal%2Feast_bay&id=7545102
________________________ ________________________ ________
WWWTTFFF????
This guy was tried by a jury of his peers.
And the DOJ won't go after the obvious crime in the black panther mess.
I will give you a chance to explain your rationale of comparing SECURITY GUARDS at a Philadelphia polling station to a man being OPENLY EXECUTED by a white San Francisco cop which was recorded by passengers and video cameras? Please show me the relevence of equating these two scenarios...
-
Just keep it up. They have never seen white people riot and it will not be a pretty picture. Even some blacks know this.
YAWN...
A white can not even arrange a tea party rally without fighting with one another....you see your own as far greater than what they are. Very soon you will be killing one another at a rate that will astonish yourselves as the economic depression in america escalates.
-
There is no comparison in the crime, the distinction was what DOJ is choosing to look into and what it turns a blind eye too.
This cop was found guilty by a jury. If people are not happy with what was charged, they should complain to the DA in the area.
In the Black Panthers' case, this was a clear example of violation of FEDERAL election laws and the DOJ decided not to pursue a default judgement it already got against this malcontent.
-
There is no comparison in the crime, the distinction was what DOJ is choosing to look into and what it turns a blind eye too.
This cop was found guilty by a jury. If people are not happy with what was charged, they should complain to the DA in the area.
In the Black Panthers' case, this was a clear example of violation of FEDERAL election laws and the DOJ decided not to pursue a default judgement it already got against this malcontent.
How did these men violate any laws? All one sees in the video clip you provided are two men who clearly stated they are security, standing in front of a polling station. Behind them are men and women comfortably engaging in conversation and standing around. Where is the violation? Why would the DOJ need to involve itself in a case where there is no case?
Is this another case of you knitting together pieces of information trying to make a case where there is none?
If the security guards were forcing people into the voting station at gun point and forcing them to vote one way or another...YEAH you'd probably have a case, but that is not the case. So where are your facts for a DOJ case? As it stands you merely posted a video of Black men doing their job and somehow this is supose to equate to EXECUTING AN INNOCENT MAN???!!!
-
YAWN...
A white can not even arrange a tea party rally without fighting with one another....you see your own as far greater than what they are. Very soon you will be killing one another at a rate that will astonish yourselves as the economic depression in america escalates.
Like the black people in Darfur?
-
How did these men violate any laws? All one sees in the video clip you provided are two men who clearly stated they are security, standing in front of a polling station. Behind them are men and women comfortably engaging in conversation and standing around. Where is the violation? Why would the DOJ need to involve itself in a case where there is no case?
Is this another case of you knitting together pieces of information trying to make a case where there is none?
If the security guards were forcing people into the voting station at gun point and forcing them to vote one way or another...YEAH you'd probably have a case, but that is not the case. So where are your facts for a DOJ case? As it stands you merely posted a video of Black men doing their job and somehow this is supose to equate to EXECUTING AN INNOCENT MAN???!!!
Wrong, I know election law and you are clueless.
You cant brandish weapons at the entrance of the voting place. That is voter intimidation and a clear violation of the law.
Security? For who? Who hired them?
-
Like the black people in Darfur?
That was actually Arabic Muslims (surprise, surprise) committing genocide on the native blacks of Darfur with the full backing of Sudanese government (the President of which now has an outstanding warrant for war crimes on his head yet no one in the international community cares).
-
That was actually Arabic Muslims (surprise, surprise) committing genocide on the native blacks of Darfur with the full backing of Sudanese government (the President of which now has an outstanding warrant for war crimes on his head yet no one in the international community cares).
They're not Black African Muslims? ???
-
They're not Black African Muslims? ???
Nope. The janjaweed, the Sudanese government funded Muslim death squads, were comprised of Arab Muslim tribes. Of course, no one cares about Darfur as it doesn't sell papers. :-X
-
Nope. The janjaweed, the Sudanese government funded Muslim death squads, were comprised of Arab Muslim tribes. Of course, no one cares about Darfur as it doesn't sell papers. :-X
Huh, I just looked it up and found some stuff about the janjaweed. I'm starting to think Muslims can be a little bit hateful... :o
-
Huh, I just looked it up and found some stuff about the janjaweed. I'm starting to think Muslims can be a little bit hateful... :o
Gee, you think?
Of course the MSM did a terrific job ignoring the entire Darfur conflict (which killed 1000x as many people as the Israeli-Palestine conflict has) because Muslims are 24/7/365 victims and Muslim-on-black violence doesn't sell papers, regardless of the sheer brutality of it (mass murder, systematic rape of the native women, torture, amputation of limbs, forced eviction, etc, etc). ::)
-
YAWN...
A white can not even arrange a tea party rally without fighting with one another....you see your own as far greater than what they are. Very soon you will be killing one another at a rate that will astonish yourselves as the economic depression in america escalates.
You really do live in a fantasy, hypicritical world. You are in for a rude awakening. Whites will stand together I can guarantee it. If anything I fear for blacks since they are the minority in the USA yet will start the initial wave of riots. Most citizens in America are well armed so we'll just see how this all plays out. Many whites I talk to in America have a huge resentment towards the political correct pussyfying society that USA has become. And they can't wait to change it for the better.
You act like your own are far greater than they are. Please show me where your greatness has benefitted the world? Genocide committed by black on black is well known. It's no secret that blacks were sold as slaves by blacks to whites. You really need to put down the kool aid.
-
Samson is an uneducated, black Muslim that loathes whites, Christians and Jews and who also has to hang onto fictitious articles written by the likes of Sorcha Faal to prove her idiotic points. She is little more than an angry propaganda machine.
-
I don't really see a distinction between a murder case and an alleged intimidation at a polling station.
I'm not excusing the actions of those at the polling station, if as alleged, they tried to subvert democracy there should be an investigation, but i would caution you 333 against making the issue trivial by trying to compare it to shooting and/or murder investigations.
For the record these black panthers are not what one would call 'real' black panthers. That group disbanded in the 70's or early 80's and the name has been taken by a far more radical group of idiots undoing all the good of the civil rights movement, by 'acting a fool'.
-
How did these men violate any laws? All one sees in the video clip you provided are two men who clearly stated they are security, standing in front of a polling station. Behind them are men and women comfortably engaging in conversation and standing around. Where is the violation? Why would the DOJ need to involve itself in a case where there is no case?
Is this another case of you knitting together pieces of information trying to make a case where there is none?
If the security guards were forcing people into the voting station at gun point and forcing them to vote one way or another...YEAH you'd probably have a case, but that is not the case. So where are your facts for a DOJ case? As it stands you merely posted a video of Black men doing their job and somehow this is supose to equate to EXECUTING AN INNOCENT MAN???!!!
Sampson, nobody hired these 2 thugs to be Security, and as 333 mentioned you cant brandish weapons at the entrance of the voting place, it is against the Law.
If it had been 2 KKK member's standing with weapons outside a voting place, I am sure they would be getting prosecuted.
-
1) lock up anyone who tries to intimidate voters
2) lock up cops who shoot ppl in cuffs.
-
________________________ ________________________ ________
"WWWTTFFF????
This guy was tried by a jury of his peers.
And the DOJ won't go after the obvious crime in the black panther mess."
Woah thats a first...Black Panther in Black Neighborhood
Cop who shoots guy in back while cuffed...
And you are trying to compare it for some kind of political point...
Truly amazing...
-
I thought all white people got off from their crimes. Looks like this cop is doing time. ::)
-
________________________ ________________________ ________
"WWWTTFFF????
This guy was tried by a jury of his peers.
And the DOJ won't go after the obvious crime in the black panther mess."
Woah thats a first...Black Panther in Black Neighborhood
Cop who shoots guy in back while cuffed...
And you are trying to compare it for some kind of political point...
Truly amazing...
My comparison is what the DOJ is deciding to get involved with and not involved with.
-
Ha,ha ha,Samson is a clown.Hey Samson,let me explain something to you you pea brained little racist.Whites dont have riots and burn their OWN hoods down like you ignorant blacks do.When whites get pissed off we have guys like McCVEIGH WHO GET THE FUCKING JOB DONE.
Take a look at the stats you little idiot.Compare black on black crime to white on white and do it on a per capita basis.Then compare black on white crime vs. white on black.I believe there were about 36,000 black on white rapes and ZERO white on black rapes.
Your people are the most violent on earth.Take a look at the African continent,take a look at black on black crime here,Christ your men cant even get enough fucking loyalty to stay with the mother of their kids as 70% of you people are born out of wedlock.
Whites dont turn on each other like you people.You dont see people of beverly hills burning their own neighborhoods down.That happens in the black areas of LA.
AS FAR AS THE BLACK PANTHERS BEING SECURITY FOR WHOM?PLEASE.PLEASE,PLEASE TELL THEM TO COME TO MY POLLING BOOTH IN nOV.You will see a bunch of dead guy bitches[to quote the rap group NWA] on your television set that night.Especially tell that skinny little bitch made homo Shabazz to come on down.Id turn him upside down and ram his black head like a pogo stick off the pavement.
-
The priorities of this admn are completely asinine.
-
How did these men violate any laws? All one sees in the video clip you provided are two men who clearly stated they are security, standing in front of a polling station. Behind them are men and women comfortably engaging in conversation and standing around. Where is the violation? Why would the DOJ need to involve itself in a case where there is no case?
The same guy was screaming for the death of white babies in the other video. You think he wasnt there to intimidate, you fucking retarded garbage.
-
Wrong, I know election law and you are clueless.
You cant brandish weapons at the entrance of the voting place. That is voter intimidation and a clear violation of the law.
Security? For who? Who hired them?
Now you know election law..HAHAH ... 3 you don't know jackshit about anything... Stop it. Your own questions at the end of your statement condemn you: Security? For who? Who hired them? Before you jump on an issue with ignorance toward it, you must first get the facts so you don't look like some incompitent that adept at "ambulance chasing". THe fact that you DO NOT have an answer to these questions shows your opinion is based upon something other than facts or truth. Then again lawyers rarely have facts or truth in any case.
It is clear as glass that these security guards did not intimidate anyone as i have mentioned and you saw in the video people casualy standing outside of and going into and out of the buildings polling station with no fear or confrontation from any of these men.. Add to this we have no idea why these men may have been called into use at this building, was there an incident earlier in the day, was it crowd control, were they the building's security that is always present everyday...WHAT!?!?!!?? you have nor I nor anyone has a clue from this video clip. And therefore have NO GROUNDS to comment on anything.
All of a sudden you are mouthing the same shit the white -fag- in the video screamed out concerning the security guards having batons and not addressing who they are nor why they are there.... For the sake of closure here is the results of the so called case against the three men, which by the way was thrown out. Gee I wonder if it was because THERE WAS NO CASE.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/29/career-lawyers-overruled-on-voting-case/?feat=home_cube_position1
So far as my initial questions about what crime they committed to call in the DOJ, you still have not answered. And as always you do the duck and dodge when it comes to answering. How does having a baton compare to a white cop EXECUTING A INNOCENT PERSON?... all captured on film while five other white cops who were there and LIED their ass off about what happened and about another fifty cops appearing later who lied also in regards to what happened. Come on now...don't get despertate to just post shit all day long and post foolishness like this.... this is ridiculous
So far as this white cop goes... he more than likely will serve little to no time at all and for all intents and purposes he may very well be transferred to another precinct, another county, another part of the state or to another state all together where he will continue to be paid and will serve no time at all. You saying you are form New York should know this all too well. We have all heard of the many white cops that moved to Idaho after being convicted of crimes...why there you may ask... big time Klan territory in Idaho that protects that type od scum. Keep an eye on this bastard and lets see if he is suddenly transfered or decides to move to Idaho or suddenly appears on th epolice force in another precinct, county, state or better yet he may transfer over to the fire department as other cops caught in the same murder tactics have...
-
Ha,ha ha,Samson is a clown.Hey Samson,let me explain something to you you pea brained little racist.Whites dont have riots and burn their OWN hoods down like you ignorant blacks do.When whites get pissed off we have guys like McCVEIGH WHO GET THE FUCKING JOB DONE.
Take a look at the stats you little idiot.Compare black on black crime to white on white and do it on a per capita basis.Then compare black on white crime vs. white on black.I believe there were about 36,000 black on white rapes and ZERO white on black rapes.
Your people are the most violent on earth.Take a look at the African continent,take a look at black on black crime here,Christ your men cant even get enough fucking loyalty to stay with the mother of their kids as 70% of you people are born out of wedlock.
Whites dont turn on each other like you people.You dont see people of beverly hills burning their own neighborhoods down.That happens in the black areas of LA.
AS FAR AS THE BLACK PANTHERS BEING SECURITY FOR WHOM?PLEASE.PLEASE,PLEASE TELL THEM TO COME TO MY POLLING BOOTH IN nOV.You will see a bunch of dead guy bitches[to quote the rap group NWA] on your television set that night.Especially tell that skinny little bitch made homo Shabazz to come on down.Id turn him upside down and ram his black head like a pogo stick off the pavement.
The GETBIG Queen has an opinion... how cute. Did you write this with your legs crossed while you were wearing your high heels or while applying your lip stick...which was it Queen Mimnaugh? lso noticed you are still getting you info from Stormfront... at least there is a site to make you feel good and if all else fails a roid shot will make everything better.
Here is some humor that you should find familiar and comforting that there are many like yourself out there in the world... you should get hours and hours of laughter out of it while reminiscing about doing the same things and noticing some of these people are your relatives.
-
Now you know election law..HAHAH ... 3 you don't know jackshit about anything... Stop it. Your own questions at the end of your statement condemn you: Security? For who? Who hired them? Before you jump on an issue with ignorance toward it, you must first get the facts so you don't look like some incompitent that adept at "ambulance chasing". THe fact that you DO NOT have an answer to these questions shows your opinion is based upon something other than facts or truth. Then again lawyers rarely have facts or truth in any case.
It is clear as glass that these security guards did not intimidate anyone as i have mentioned and you saw in the video people casualy standing outside of and going into and out of the buildings polling station with no fear or confrontation from any of these men.. Add to this we have no idea why these men may have been called into use at this building, was there an incident earlier in the day, was it crowd control, were they the building's security that is always present everyday...WHAT!?!?!!?? you have nor I nor anyone has a clue from this video clip. And therefore have NO GROUNDS to comment on anything.
All of a sudden you are mouthing the same shit the white -fag- in the video screamed out concerning the security guards having batons and not addressing who they are nor why they are there.... For the sake of closure here is the results of the so called case against the three men, which by the way was thrown out. Gee I wonder if it was because THERE WAS NO CASE.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/29/career-lawyers-overruled-on-voting-case/?feat=home_cube_position1
So far as my initial questions about what crime they committed to call in the DOJ, you still have not answered. And as always you do the duck and dodge when it comes to answering. How does having a baton compare to a white cop EXECUTING A INNOCENT PERSON?... all captured on film while five other white cops who were there and LIED their ass off about what happened and about another fifty cops appearing later who lied also in regards to what happened. Come on now...don't get despertate to just post shit all day long and post foolishness like this.... this is ridiculous
So far as this white cop goes... he more than likely will serve little to no time at all and for all intents and purposes he may very well be transferred to another precinct, another county, another part of the state or to another state all together where he will continue to be paid and will serve no time at all. You saying you are form New York should know this all too well. We have all heard of the many white cops that moved to Idaho after being convicted of crimes...why there you may ask... big time Klan territory in Idaho that protects that type od scum. Keep an eye on this bastard and lets see if he is suddenly transfered or decides to move to Idaho or suddenly appears on th epolice force in another precinct, county, state or better yet he may transfer over to the fire department as other cops caught in the same murder tactics have...
What does one have to do with the other? They are both wrong. I saw the video of that cop executing that kid and it's wrong that he's going to walk. It's also wrong these guys were trying to intimidate people and they're going to walk.
-
The same guy was screaming for the death of white babies in the other video. You think he wasnt there to intimidate, you fucking retarded garbage.
Hello BINTHERE AND STILL STUPID
How does that relate to a suposed violation of the law with weapons at a poliing station or to a white cop executing an innocent man and five additional cops LYING about the matter when asked what happened?
Take you time and think about the question being asked before you open you mouth and put your foot in it again.
-
What does one have to do with the other? They are both wrong. I saw the video of that cop executing that kid and it's wrong that he's going to walk. It's also wrong these guys were trying to intimidate people and they're going to walk.
That is exactly my point... There is no comparison between the two. In the security guard case there is NO INFORMATION FOR ONE TO CAST JUDGEMENT ON ANYONE and no evidence of intimidation, coercsion or threatening to justify any action, which is why the case was THROWN OUT (see the Washington Times link in the earlier post). In the cop case it is a case of first degree murder so blatant Charles Manson should be released immediately and this cop put into the same jail cell that he has occupied for so many decades.
3 posted these video clips to try and add innocence to the white cop for reasons of which only he knows but will not admit. When I challenged him to show me the relationship between the the white cop executing an innocent man and two security guards standing in front of a building with a polling station inside he said there was none. DUH? Then why post the video?
-
I didnt try to add innocence to the cop. WTF are you talking about? The cop was rightfully convicted by a jury of his peers based on the charges brought by the DA in that locality. Crimes like that are typically local in nature. There is no reason for DOJ to get involved there.
On the stupid savages at the polling booth, carrying batons and night sticks is clearly voter intimidation and they already had a default judgment against this waste of human cells. It was only once obama /holder/perez took over the doj that this became an issue. Election law is more a federal matter in cases like this.
As for the rest of your rambling paragraphs, the video speaks for itself. They were not cops or law enforcement. What is kkk members with rifles were standing there. Would you have said the same thing? Of course not.
-
The GETBIG Queen has an opinion... how cute. Did you write this with your legs crossed while you were wearing your high heels or while applying your lip stick...which was it Queen Mimnaugh? lso noticed you are still getting you info from Stormfront... at least there is a site to make you feel good and if all else fails a roid shot will make everything better.
Here is some humor that you should find familiar and comforting that there are many like yourself out there in the world... you should get hours and hours of laughter out of it while reminiscing about doing the same things and noticing some of these people are your relatives.
Whatever fag. You're in the minority notice how everyone is owning you left and right. Nobody likes you because you are the biggest racist on the board. You still haven't answered me. If whites are so evil and bad, how are blacks any better? What have blacks done that is so much better??
-
Former Justice Official Testifies Against DOJ
The New American ^ | 7/6/2010 | Raven Clabough
Posted on Wednesday, July 07, 2010 7:41:30 AM by IbJensen
Former Department of Justice Official Christian Adams testified before the Civil Rights commission today “pursuant to a subpoena investigating the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation dismissal.” During his testimony, Adams claimed that the Obama administration has generally failed to prosecute “non-whites” in voter intimidation cases. On November 4, 2008, members of the New Black Panthers stood outside of a Philadelphia polling facility bearing nightsticks and employing an intimidating stance. When questioned about their presence and their possession of weapons, the Panther members claimed that they were concerned citizens and “that’s why we’re here.”
It was not until a youtube video of the encounter with the Panthers circulated did the incident gain notoriety, prompting the Bush Justice Department to sue the men involved for violating the 1965 Voting Rights Act through the Panthers’ use of racial slurs, military-style uniforms, and possession of weaponry.
Following the lead of the Bush administration, the Obama administration launched an investigation, and the DOJ won a default judgment against several of the New Black Panther members when they failed to appear at their hearing in April 2009.
Since then, however, the Obama administration elected to dismiss the charges after compromising with the New Black Panther members, who agreed not to carry “a deadly weapon” within the vicinity of a polling place. Until 2012, that is.
Frustrated by the Department’s decision to pursue charges against the New Black Panthers, Adams resigned his position at the Justice Department last month.
In an explosive interview with Fox News, Adams claimed, “I don’t think the department or the fine people who work there are corrupt, but in this particular instance, to abandon law-abiding citizens and abet wrongdoers constitutes corruption”.
Adams claims that the Obama administration backed off the voter intimidation case because of race and politics.
He also accuses Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez of lying to the Civil Rights Committee in May when Perez contended that there were insufficient facts to support instances of voter intimidation.
Similar to claims made by Perez, the Justice Department defended its decision to drop the case by alleging that the facts and law did not line up and that the case should not be prosecuted.
Perez asserted, “The decision regarding the disposition of the case … ultimately was made by the career attorney then serving as the Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division … We assure you that the Department is committed to comprehensive and vigorous enforcement of both the civil and criminal provisions of federal law that prohibits voter intimidation.”
Adams begs to differ.
Fox News describes Adams’ testimony today as “emotional and personal.” He insisted that attorneys in the civil rights division were actually instructed to ignore cases involving black assailants and white victims, and that the Black Panther case exemplifies his claim.
Adams claims that the DOJ took a generally “hostile” attitude towards cases involving black defendants, particularly the Black Panther case. He contends that he overheard officials describing the case as “no big deal” and that its elevated significance was a product of the media, most notably, Fox News.
Adams also indicates that during his investigation of the Philadelphia incident, he discovered evidence that similar happenings took place during the Democratic primary season in 2008, where Hillary Clinton’s supporters faced similar encounters with the militant group. Adams encouraged the commission to hear testimony from those victims as well.
The Commission hopes to hear the testimony of Christopher Coates, former chief of the Justice Department’s voting section, but the Justice Department is preventing Coates from providing such testimony.
Likewise, the Justice Department issued a statement questioning Adams motives: “It is not uncommon for attorneys with the department to have good faith disagreements about the appropriate course of action in a particular case, although it is regrettable when a former department attorney distorts the facts and makes baseless allegations to promote his or her agenda.”
Adams denies the claims made by the Justice Department and asserts that he hopes to see proper justice distributed in this clear-cut instance of voter intimidation.
-
Hello BINTHERE AND STILL STUPID
How does that relate to a suposed violation of the law with weapons at a poliing station or to a white cop executing an innocent man and five additional cops LYING about the matter when asked what happened?
Take you time and think about the question being asked before you open you mouth and put your foot in it again.
Did I say they relate you brain damaged moron? I'm calling you out for playing stupid on what their intentions were for being there. You keep calling these thugs "security" and suggest they were just hanging out being good little boys. The mere fact that you would even suggest such a thing while the same idiot in that video was proudly proclaiming that white people need to be eliminated in another video proves you are nothing but a racist shit eater defending scum. Any person with half a brain could safely bet that they were intimidating white folks from voting based on your hero's blatant and disgusting comments in other videos.
Now go fuck yourself.
-
The racist rules of O's Justice Dept.
Last Updated: 4:57 AM, July 10, 2010
Posted: 1:26 AM, July 10, 2010
Comments: 7 | More Print
Michelle Malkin
www.nypost.com
________________________ _________________
Why haven't national media outlets reported on the vile and violent rants of the New Black Panther Party thugs whose 2008 voter-intimidation tactics got a pass from the Obama administration?
This week, Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian Adams came forward with damning public testimony about how Obama officials believe "civil-rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other minorities."
In the wake of Adams' expose on how the Obama Justice Department abandoned judgments against the Black Panther bullies for the sake of racial politics, a shocking video clip of one of the lead defendants in the Philadelphia voter-intimidation case resurfaced on the Internet. It shows King Samir Shabazz during a 2009 National Geographic documentary interview spewing:
"You want freedom? You're gonna have to kill some crackers! You're gonna have to kill some of their babies!"
These death threats and white-bashing diatribes are nothing new. Last August, I reported on a sign on display outside New Black Panther defendant (and elected member of Philadelphia's 14th Ward Democratic Committee) Jerry Jackson's home. It reads: "COLORED ONLY: No Whites Allowed." In July 2009, I interviewed poll watcher Christopher Hill, whom Shabazz and Jackson called "cracker" several times while Shabazz brandished his baton.
"They physically attempted to block me," Hill recounted. He also saw a group of elderly ladies walk away from the polling site without voting while the duo preened at the entrance. "If you're a poll watcher, you shouldn't be dressed in paramilitary garb," Hill said, as he wondered aloud at what would have happened if he'd showed up in the same sort of costume.
In May 2009, I reported on the affidavit of civil-rights attorney and poll watcher Bartle Bull, who witnessed the NBPP thuggery in Philadelphia and reported on billy club-wielding Shabazz's Election Day boast: "You're about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."
In the fall of 2008, just days before he showed up to hector white poll workers, Shabazz told the Philadelphia Inquirer:
"I'm about the total destruction of white people. I'm about the total liberation of black people. I hate white people. I hate my enemy . . . The only thing the cracker understands is violence . . . The only thing the cracker understands is gunpowder. You got to take violence to violence."
The desire to kill, subordinate and demonize white people is a staple of New Black Panther Party propaganda. A "block party" music video from the Trenton chapter, posted on YouTube, calls on black followers to "bang for freedom," "put the bang right into a cracker's face," and "if you're going to bang, bang for black power . . . hang a cracker . . . if you're going to bang, bang on the white devil . . . burying him near the river bank with the right shovel . . . community revolution in progress . . . banging for crackers to go to hell, we don't need 'em."
Chanting "Black Power," Minister Najee Muhammad, national field marshal for the party, and Uhuru Shakur, local chairman of the Atlanta chapter, issued a pre-Election Day 2008 threat to "racists and other angry whites who are upset over an impending Barack Obama presidential victory." Said Muhammad: "Most certainly, we cannot allow these racist forces to slaughter our babies or commit other acts of violence against the black population, nor our black president."
If a Tea Party activist threatened to kill the babies of his political opponents, it wouldn't just be front-page news. It would be the subject of Democrat-led congressional hearings, a series of terrified New York Times columns about the perilous "climate of hate," a Justice Department probe by Attorney General Eric Holder, a domestic-terror alert from Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and another Important Teachable Moment Speech from Healer-in-Chief Obama.
But with the racism shoe on the other foot, Team Obama and its media water-carriers are exhibiting the very racial cowardice Holder once purported to condemn. Thanks to Obama's Justice Department, these black supremacists are free to show up on the next Election Day at polling places in full paramilitary regalia with nightsticks, hurling racist, anti-American epithets at those exercising their right to vote and at those protecting the integrity of the electoral process.
The reaction of our national media watchdogs: Shhhhhhhh.
malkinblog@gmail.com
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_racist_rules_of_justice_dept_RvuWXpAkyn0yrnmBbfHdTN#ixzz0tHg3AhCU
-
1) lock up anyone who tries to intimidate voters
2) lock up cops who shoot ppl in cuffs.
The current DOJ doesn't agree with you 240 on your 1st point
-
The current DOJ doesn't agree with you 240 on your 1st point
agreed. If I had a time machine, I'd go back to 2008 and tell Mccains vetting team to do a better job ;)
The GOP wouldn't be letting this nonsense go in the voting booths.
-
agreed. If I had a time machine, I'd go back to 2008 and tell Mccains vetting team to do a better job ;)
The GOP wouldn't be letting this nonsense go in the voting booths.
??? ??? ???
-
Poor Samson,still thinkinhg blacks can band together when their cowardly men cant even nut up and stay with their women to raise the kids they spawn.Ha,ha,ha look at Oakland,the ignorant black rioting again,looting and stealing and burning their own city down.What a bunch of ignorant savages.No wonder they still transport stuff on top of their burry heads in Africa.They still havent discovered the wheel.
-
-
agreed. If I had a time machine, I'd go back to 2008 and tell Mccains vetting team to do a better job ;)
The GOP wouldn't be letting this nonsense go in the voting booths.
Maybe you should tell him not to stop his stupid campaign to do nothing about the economy,and maybe while your at it,you could tell him to actually fight to win and speak about Barack Hussein Obamas blatant anti white racism and rev. Wright and Bill Ayers and father flager instead of running a campaign that was little more then a concession speech.Thank God he had Palin,he wouldnt have gotten 20% of the vote without her as EVERY conservative in the country despises him.