Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: TRIX on July 27, 2010, 06:15:45 PM

Title: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: TRIX on July 27, 2010, 06:15:45 PM
(http://gallery.rxmuscle.com/newgallery/DSC_9087_RWZCKXJQHS.jpg)
(http://gallery.rxmuscle.com/newgallery/DSC_1834_GYWRWWFFQM.jpg)
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: Palpatine Q on July 27, 2010, 06:20:32 PM
Nice Bi's  ::) ::)
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: SF1900 on July 27, 2010, 06:23:37 PM
His bi's look too perfect not to be the work of synthol.

anyway, crazy small waist.
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on July 27, 2010, 06:31:57 PM
them some crazy negro genetics..............th ere isnt a white man on planet earth that could possess those dimensions

hey, but we're all the same ::) ::)
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: JimmyJam1974 on July 27, 2010, 06:35:16 PM
His bi's look too perfect not to be the work of synthol.

are there rumors?

thos bi's look full & round (no homo), suspect?
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: SF1900 on July 27, 2010, 06:37:08 PM
are there rumors?

thos bi's look full & round (no homo), suspect?

Don't know, I guess I am being biased. If not synthol, those are some crazy genetics  :o :o
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: che on July 27, 2010, 06:39:38 PM
there isnt a white man on planet earth that could possess those dimensions


(http://www.bodyfreaks.com/photoplog/images/1/1_1359253403_091cb55562_o.jpg)
(http://www.isteroids.com/bodybuilding/images/dennis_wolf3.jpg)
(http://lh4.ggpht.com/_3bswfqDBYps/S3BOgK_frGI/AAAAAAAAAOc/_dRKHuQlNME/s640/Dennis%20Wolf.jpg)
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: Mr Nobody on July 27, 2010, 06:39:49 PM
Good to see a pro without a GH gut, Genetics always rule.
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: JimmyJam1974 on July 27, 2010, 06:41:31 PM
Che - thoughts on how WOLF will come in for the O this year?
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: che on July 27, 2010, 06:43:38 PM
Che - thoughts on how WOLF will come in for the O this year?
Soft , I think he's done
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: G_Thang on July 27, 2010, 06:43:45 PM
Che - thoughts on how WOLF will come in for the O this year?

he cant place in 10k shows...so what you think?    
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on July 27, 2010, 06:49:17 PM
FYI...Ed Nunn is straight country a$$ like Ronnie Coleman.  No synthol needed!  Check vid series where he eats wildlife meats, microwaves his eggs not to lose protein in pan, his chubby latin honey, and so forht.  In other words....he is too damn country to even understand synthol.  yip yip

ronnie coleman understood synthol just fine...........look at the years in the middle rein of his olympia when his calves seemed to mysteriously improve..........then shrink back down towards the end


and what the fuck are you even talking about..................t hey are not SO country that they dont understand:  insulin, steroids(anabolic and androgenic), igf-1, salt/potassium loading, carb loading, protein cycling, ect


why if they "understand" all of these things, could they not wrap their head around synthol ::) ::)
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on July 27, 2010, 07:13:37 PM
them some crazy negro genetics..............th ere isnt a white man on planet earth that could possess those dimensions

hey, but we're all the same ::) ::)

A little bit more balanced look in my opinion.

(http://bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/img/user_images/growable/2008/05/05/11041706/gallerypic/1957541e.jpg)
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on July 27, 2010, 07:18:48 PM
A little bit more balanced look in my opinion.

(http://bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/img/user_images/growable/2008/05/05/11041706/gallerypic/1957541e.jpg)

i agree, to me personally ed nunn is startign to get in that "too thin" waist zone, like brian buchanon


it just starts to look weird and out of proportion afterwhile........humans arenet supposed to be segmented like insects

(http://www.musclememory.com/images/recent/BuchananBrian.jpg)

a waist that skinny makes the torso look weak or somethign
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: Parker on July 27, 2010, 09:34:45 PM
i agree, to me personally ed nunn is startign to get in that "too thin" waist zone, like brian buchanon


it just starts to look weird and out of proportion afterwhile........humans arenet supposed to be segmented like insects

(http://www.musclememory.com/images/recent/BuchananBrian.jpg)

a waist that skinny makes the torso look weak or somethign
Except Brian was squatting with 600+ pounds, more than Arnold used to do. Unfortunately, a lit of good it did Brian, because at the 1988 Mr. O he had stick legs.
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: WillGrant on July 28, 2010, 01:48:49 AM
Good to see a pro without a GH gut, Genetics always rule.
Give him time  :D
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: 20inch calves on July 28, 2010, 02:02:55 AM
i think nunn has better structure and potential than freeman..time will tell
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: disco_stu on July 28, 2010, 02:14:48 AM
you guys are on drugs if you think arnies balance was better than nunn's, and that a waist can be too thin.

and as for the synthol- dont think so. there is way too much definition for them to be synthol and synthol is hit and miss- for him to nail those arms so perfectly in terms of size an definition then it couldnt be synthol..check out the rest of his arms and physique- balance and symmetry.

the guy's got grade A genetics, plain and simple.

Finally, to compare to buchanan is a joke. The guy had a tiny waist but like that said, his legs were sticks.

so again no comparison- might as well compare to a fitness model- theyve got tiny waists too.

give the guy some props, probably the best genetics ive seen since dexter jackson.

cant think of anyone prior to that except levrone that had such great genes.

and dont come back with flex wheeler- the guy had no lats, so so legs, and calf implants..great arms and delts, sure. and great conditioning...but he was and still is way over rated.

Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: James Blunt on July 28, 2010, 02:22:04 AM
you guys are on drugs if you think arnies balance was better than nunn's, and that a waist can be too thin.

and as for the synthol- dont think so. there is way too much definition for them to be synthol and synthol is hit and miss- for him to nail those arms so perfectly in terms of size an definition then it couldnt be synthol..check out the rest of his arms and physique- balance and symmetry.

the guy's got grade A genetics, plain and simple.

Finally, to compare to buchanan is a joke. The guy had a tiny waist but like that said, his legs were sticks.

so again no comparison- might as well compare to a fitness model- theyve got tiny waists too.

give the guy some props, probably the best genetics ive seen since dexter jackson.

cant think of anyone prior to that except levrone that had such great genes.

and dont come back with flex wheeler- the guy had no lats, so so legs, and calf implants..great arms and delts, sure. and great conditioning...but he was and still is way over rated.


This is a ridiculous post.
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: WillGrant on July 28, 2010, 02:32:52 AM
This is a ridiculous post.
Disco Stu still thinks pink cotton bell bottoms are all the rage  ;D
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on July 28, 2010, 02:34:44 AM
This is a ridiculous post.

i agree, whole lot of wrong-ness in that post
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: MORTALCOIL on July 28, 2010, 02:51:09 AM
you guys are on drugs if you think arnies balance was better than nunn's, and that a waist can be too thin.

and as for the synthol- dont think so. there is way too much definition for them to be synthol and synthol is hit and miss- for him to nail those arms so perfectly in terms of size an definition then it couldnt be synthol..check out the rest of his arms and physique- balance and symmetry.

the guy's got grade A genetics, plain and simple.

Finally, to compare to buchanan is a joke. The guy had a tiny waist but like that said, his legs were sticks.

so again no comparison- might as well compare to a fitness model- theyve got tiny waists too.

give the guy some props, probably the best genetics ive seen since dexter jackson.

cant think of anyone prior to that except levrone that had such great genes.

and dont come back with flex wheeler- the guy had no lats, so so legs, and calf implants..great arms and delts, sure. and great conditioning...but he was and still is way over rated.



Where's the definition? Look at Freeman's bis, at least you see the separation. Nunn's are just plain round and have neither definition nor any kind of vascularity.
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: cross-of-iron on July 28, 2010, 03:06:33 AM
His synthol use in the biceps is obvious...
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: disco_stu on July 28, 2010, 03:37:59 AM
Where's the definition? Look at Freeman's bis, at least you see the separation. Nunn's are just plain round and have neither definition nor any kind of vascularity.

have you ever seen a bicep?

compare nunns to arnolds, buchanans, and everyone else, then compare to synthol users.

the definition is present at the separation between the muscles, not the muscles themselves. there is nothing different between nunns and buchanan's, and arnies bis are also round but clearly defined between bis and tris.

now look at synthol users like kamali for instance. the bis are lumpy and the muscles are not clearly defined. whats more, synthol users often use for imbalances, which have a tell tale sign of an imbalance elsewhere- for an arm to be equally strong, but have inbalanced bis, then the tris are usually out of whack also, or one pec is larger, or a delt, whatever...

now point out the rest of the wrong-ness and we'll go point by point shall we?

shall we start with the fanboys and go gooey about flex wheeler?

or maybe the concept that a waist can be too small? (talk about ridiculous)

oh, sorry, i forgot, this is getbig- home of the illiterate, under qualified, ignorant and plain stupid...dont know why i waste my time..
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: cross-of-iron on July 28, 2010, 03:44:23 AM
have you ever seen a bicep?

compare nunns to arnolds, buchanans, and everyone else, then compare to synthol users.

the definition is present at the separation between the muscles, not the muscles themselves. there is nothing different between nunns and buchanan's, and arnies bis are also round but clearly defined between bis and tris.

now look at synthol users like kamali for instance. the bis are lumpy and the muscles are not clearly defined. whats more, synthol users often use for imbalances, which have a tell tale sign of an imbalance elsewhere- for an arm to be equally strong, but have inbalanced bis, then the tris are usually out of whack also, or one pec is larger, or a delt, whatever...

now point out the rest of the wrong-ness and we'll go point by point shall we?

shall we start with the fanboys and go gooey about flex wheeler?

or maybe the concept that a waist can be too small? (talk about ridiculous)

oh, sorry, i forgot, this is getbig- home of the illiterate, under qualified, ignorant and plain stupid...dont know why i waste my time..
There is a difference between using and abusing. The best users are the ones that never raise suspicion. He is not one of those but he is also not a clear abuser either.
Title: Re: Ed Nunn is the real X man
Post by: Mr Nobody on July 28, 2010, 04:22:05 AM
Give him time  :D
Yea seems to start happening after you win a show. ;D