Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Arnold jr on August 17, 2010, 05:06:57 PM

Title: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Arnold jr on August 17, 2010, 05:06:57 PM
Biggest bunch of tards on the planet, especially Joy and Whoopie. Malkin does a fantastic job showing that a free thinking brain trumps ideological progressivism every time.


Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: blacken700 on August 17, 2010, 05:23:45 PM


this is what you call owned ;D  Michelle Malkin couldn't own a used car :D :D :D
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 17, 2010, 07:01:29 PM
Biggest bunch of tards on the planet, especially Joy and Whoopie. Malkin does a fantastic job showing that a free thinking brain trumps ideological progressivism every time.




Nice.  She is right.  And I'm glad she pointed out the standard moral equivalency arguments that so many people use.  They are weak and ineffective.  I might buy her book. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: MCWAY on August 17, 2010, 07:55:58 PM
Biggest bunch of tards on the planet, especially Joy and Whoopie. Malkin does a fantastic job showing that a free thinking brain trumps ideological progressivism every time.




Michelle had me at "But, guess what!! NEWS FLASH!! George Bush is not in office, anymore!!" She basically slapped the lips off Behar's face, with that alone.

We all know that Behar's has been on Obama's nuts from the get-go. I'm surprised she kept her panties on, when he did his visit a week or two ago.

But, Michelle held her ground. Behar kept trying to change the subject to Bush; but Malkin kept it right on Obama.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Arnold jr on August 17, 2010, 08:03:02 PM


this is what you call owned ;D  Michelle Malkin couldn't own a used car :D :D :D

Please, that was nothing but a loud mouthed bully twisting words and trying to make something black and white even when somethings aren't black and white. He didn't make any points, he didn't burn her statements, all he did was talk loudly and interrupt. He is the master of interrupting, that much I will give him.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tarzan on August 17, 2010, 08:05:12 PM


this is what you call owned ;D  Michelle Malkin couldn't own a used car :D :D :D
Chris Matthews is a fucking ass clown. He is not interested in any response from her notice how he interrupts her. He needs to be bitched slapped the fucking moron.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 17, 2010, 08:12:30 PM


this is what you call owned ;D  Michelle Malkin couldn't own a used car :D :D :D
PRIME example of why msnbc is joke  ::)
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Arnold jr on August 17, 2010, 08:23:05 PM
Chris Matthews is a fucking ass clown. He is not interested in any response from her notice how he interrupts her. He needs to be bitched slapped the fucking moron.

So true. It blows my mind, Matthews and his gang of MSNBC wonders still take themselves so seriously, they still view themselves as leaders in the world of journalism when truth be told they are the Detroit Lions of the national media. They get their asses handed to them daily and they continue to act like flaming piles of doucherificness.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 17, 2010, 08:35:11 PM
michelle malkin was one of the original 911 truthers.

she trashed bush and the doubted the official story - IN THE FOREIGN PRESS.

She talked a lot of shit about the penn plane crash.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Eyeball Chambers on August 17, 2010, 08:39:46 PM
michelle malkin was one of the original 911 truthers.

she trashed bush and the doubted the official story - IN THE FOREIGN PRESS.

She talked a lot of shit about the penn plane crash.


I was waiting for this, thanks my friend!
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 17, 2010, 08:50:24 PM
 ::)
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 17, 2010, 09:25:34 PM
Please, that was nothing but a loud mouthed bully twisting words and trying to make something black and white even when somethings aren't black and white. He didn't make any points, he didn't burn her statements, all he did was talk loudly and interrupt. He is the master of interrupting, that much I will give him.

cmon guys...the broad said some wild shit and he wouldnt let her back out of it...dumb ass reporting...mutha fucks have their minds made up on both sides...then come up with a conclusion and then go ahead and only use what facts support their predestined theory...and tony...if msnbc is a joke...what do you call fox news
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 17, 2010, 09:44:44 PM
michelle malkin was one of the original 911 truthers.

she trashed bush and the doubted the official story - IN THE FOREIGN PRESS.

She talked a lot of shit about the penn plane crash.

yes 240 we know you bring it up everytime she is mentioned like it gives some credibility to your idiocy... ::)
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 17, 2010, 09:49:45 PM
cmon guys...the broad said some wild shit and he wouldnt let her back out of it...dumb ass reporting...mutha fucks have their minds made up on both sides...then come up with a conclusion and then go ahead and only use what facts support their predestined theory...and tony...if msnbc is a joke...what do you call fox news
LOL mal she said that there were ppl who said that it may have been self inflicted and then he went on a tirade demading an answer as to whether or not SHE thought he HAD SHOT HIMSELF...

SHE never said that...SHE was saying that OTHERS had reason to believe question that...

SHE never said that THEY said he shot himself...SHE said that THEY had reason to believe that the wound may have been SELF INFLICTED...

but dont let facts get in the way...

I agree mal fox has some morons like ive always said hannity is basically the same as this dude but on fox...msnbc does seem to have the market cornered on morons and ignorant gotcha journalism though  ;)
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 18, 2010, 06:01:01 AM
yes 240 we know you bring it up everytime she is mentioned like it gives some credibility to your idiocy... ::)

It's actually HER idiocy.

She was a 'truther' in 2002.  Long before the 911 loose change kids.  She was one of the originals actually.  She went overseas to spout her beliefs in the FOREIGN PRESS.  Real patriotic, right?
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: blacken700 on August 18, 2010, 06:04:00 AM
the right loves to protect their nutjobs ;D
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Soul Crusher on August 18, 2010, 06:07:28 AM
She is hot as hell.  Throw a boob job on her and about 10 lbs and bang! 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: blacken700 on August 18, 2010, 06:16:58 AM
i didn't say i wouldn't do her, i would stuff a rag in her mouth so i wouldn't have to listen to her ;D
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: George Whorewell on August 18, 2010, 07:37:26 AM
My wife once again lays the smack down on the hideous mishapen dykes of the liberal media.

Malkin, McGlowan, Hasselback, Palin, Ingram= Hot traditional orgy of family values and interracial sex

The View= Whoppi "The Predator" Goldberg jerking his penis to Rachel Maddow shaving Joy Behars armpits while Rosie O'Donell makes manly facial expressions in the background.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Parker on August 18, 2010, 08:14:11 AM
Biggest bunch of tards on the planet, especially Joy and Whoopie. Malkin does a fantastic job showing that a free thinking brain trumps ideological progressivism every time.



Gee, like that was hard. A Smart, attractive woman vs Bitter, loudmouth, crying about losing weight, know-nothings who wished for their better days...Every wonder what happened to all the other intelligent, young women that been a part of the show?

i have never liked the view, especially when Star Jones was on their---and came out with a Ham and Egg sandwich and said, "It's true, you can eat what you want!"
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: BM OUT on August 18, 2010, 09:52:26 AM
cmon guys...the broad said some wild shit and he wouldnt let her back out of it...dumb ass reporting...mutha fucks have their minds made up on both sides...then come up with a conclusion and then go ahead and only use what facts support their predestined theory...and tony...if msnbc is a joke...what do you call fox news

Successful?
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 18, 2010, 09:54:10 AM
Successful?


So is flava flav
boom
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Soul Crusher on August 18, 2010, 09:55:42 AM

So is flava flav
boom

I think Malkin is definately a hottie, but I like a girl with more curves and booty. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: George Whorewell on August 18, 2010, 09:57:39 AM

So is flava flav
boom

So being unsucessful is reserved for crappy, second rate news networks and non drug addicts?
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 18, 2010, 09:58:17 AM
I think Malkin is definately a hottie, but I like a girl with more curves and booty. 

I like a cross between volleyball women and softball women.

Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 18, 2010, 09:59:02 AM
So being unsucessful is reserved for crappy, second rate news networks and non drug addicts?
what in sam hill are you taking about
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: George Whorewell on August 18, 2010, 10:14:07 AM
Well, you said that Flava Flav was sucessful and then said Boom! afterwards when Billy called Fox successful.

I just wanted to get an idea of what the appropriate measuring stick was, so I took the opposite of Fox News and the opposite of Flava Flav.

If being successful is Fox News and Flava Flav and being unsuccessful is   MSNBC and _______ , could we also then reach the conclusion that comparing a cable news network to a drug addicted hype man from an early 90's rap group who briefly stared on a reality TV show is probably closer to apples and bowling balls?

Why not include Oprah, Bill Gates, Facebook, DELL, Warren Buffet, Drew Brees, Lucy Liu, Shogun Rua, Kobe Bryant, or 1000000 other successful people or entities?

If your point is that people are stupid, then what would your explanation be if a cable news network that was more in sync with your personal political views was # 1, instead of #234? What if instead of conservative talk show hosts dominating the airwaves, Al Franken had stayed relevant and not bankrupted the only self proclaimed "liberal" radio station?

Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 18, 2010, 10:15:55 AM
It's actually HER idiocy.

She was a 'truther' in 2002.  Long before the 911 loose change kids.  She was one of the originals actually.  She went overseas to spout her beliefs in the FOREIGN PRESS.  Real patriotic, right?
LMAO actually its painfully obvious you bring her up everytime b/c you want to either discredit her or use the fact that she thinks that way to lend credibility to your idiocy...

neither point has anything to do with the topic at hand but then again I wouldnt expect you to stick to the topic at hand...at least you didnt bring up palin in this thread
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 18, 2010, 11:35:25 AM
Well, you said that Flava Flav was sucessful and then said Boom! afterwards when Billy called Fox successful.

I just wanted to get an idea of what the appropriate measuring stick was, so I took the opposite of Fox News and the opposite of Flava Flav.

If being successful is Fox News and Flava Flav and being unsuccessful is   MSNBC and _______ , could we also then reach the conclusion that comparing a cable news network to a drug addicted hype man from an early 90's rap group who briefly stared on a reality TV show is probably closer to apples and bowling balls?

Why not include Oprah, Bill Gates, Facebook, DELL, Warren Buffet, Drew Brees, Lucy Liu, Shogun Rua, Kobe Bryant, or 1000000 other successful people or entities?

If your point is that people are stupid, then what would your explanation be if a cable news network that was more in sync with your personal political views was # 1, instead of #234? What if instead of conservative talk show hosts dominating the airwaves, Al Franken had stayed relevant and not bankrupted the only self proclaimed "liberal" radio station?



My point is just because youre popular dont make you great. As you would say of the president maybe...he handed your heroes an ass whoopin and he aint better than them in your opinion right......boom
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Soul Crusher on August 18, 2010, 11:43:41 AM
My point is just because youre popular dont make you great. As you would say of the president maybe...he handed your heroes an ass whoopin and he aint better than them in your opinion right......boom

Stop cutting Flava short. 

Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 18, 2010, 12:05:49 PM
and tony...if msnbc is a joke...what do you call fox news

The network that beats CNN and MSNBC like a drum?  The network a number of "good" CNN folks left to join?  The network with by far the most attractive female hosts?  The one the president tried to censor, but failed? 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 18, 2010, 12:07:03 PM
Mal he didnt hand anybody shit...now Ill agree she is just as bad as hannity but read this and tell me how he handed her an ass whooping
LOL mal she said that there were ppl who said that it may have been self inflicted and then he went on a tirade demading an answer as to whether or not SHE thought he HAD SHOT HIMSELF...

SHE never said that...SHE was saying that OTHERS had reason to believe question that...

SHE never said that THEY said he shot himself...SHE said that THEY had reason to believe that the wound may have been SELF INFLICTED...

but dont let facts get in the way...

I agree mal fox has some morons like ive always said hannity is basically the same as this dude but on fox...msnbc does seem to have the market cornered on morons and ignorant gotcha journalism though  ;)
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 19, 2010, 07:17:18 AM
The network that beats CNN and MSNBC like a drum?  The network a number of "good" CNN folks left to join?  The network with by far the most attractive female hosts?  The one the president tried to censor, but failed? 

And they do what you consider Honest Journalism?
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 19, 2010, 07:22:26 AM
Mal he didnt hand anybody shit...now Ill agree she is just as bad as hannity but read this and tell me how he handed her an ass whooping



Tony you know what she was getting at...trying in a slick way to throw a cloud of doubt on JKs medal...also..the phrase "some are saying" or "others say" or " there are a lot of people who say" ...those are bull shit phrases bro. Its a way to throw an opinion out there...the opinion they want. eg "there are some people that say obama worships satan" ..then under the ticker...

OBAMA WORSHIPS SATIN?
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 19, 2010, 07:28:02 AM


Tony you know what she was getting at...trying in a slick way to throw a cloud of doubt on JKs medal...also..the phrase "some are saying" or "others say" or " there are a lot of people who say" ...those are bull shit phrases bro. Its a way to throw an opinion out there...the opinion they want. eg "there are some people that say obama worships satan" ..then under the ticker...

OBAMA WORSHIPS SATIN?
Mal where there ppl who had reason to question the injury he had sustained?

if so thats not her opinion thats a fact...and should probably have been reported by matthews if he could quit trying to practice gotcha journalism...
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: dario73 on August 19, 2010, 07:29:57 AM
And they do what you consider Honest Journalism?

A lot more honest than CNN or MSNBC.

You look at the shows on CNN or MSNBC and rarely do you see a conservative in there presenting their view. Not only that, but name me a conservative or independent who has his own show in either CNN or MSNBC.  Name one.
At FOX, they have O'Reilly and Geraldo and at times you will see Liberal after liberal spouting off their garbage on FOX. You don't see that on the other networks.

I will try to find the link, but last year an INDEPENDENT media watch group placed FOX at the top for presenting more accurately opposing points of views on a number of topics that were not even reported on by the other networks.

Is FOX conservative, sure. The difference is they don't hide that fact. CNN and MSNBC try to present themselves as having impartiality, but all their hosts are all over Obama's nutsack.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 19, 2010, 07:44:21 AM
A lot more honest than CNN or MSNBC.



i read this part and stopped...
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 19, 2010, 07:45:23 AM
Mal where there ppl who had reason to question the injury he had sustained?

if so thats not her opinion thats a fact...and should probably have been reported by matthews if he could quit trying to practice gotcha journalism...
read this and respond mal
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: George Whorewell on August 19, 2010, 08:11:23 AM
My point is just because youre popular dont make you great. As you would say of the president maybe...he handed your heroes an ass whoopin and he aint better than them in your opinion right......boom

LMAO- saying boom whenever you make a stupid remark doesn't create a more dramatic or meaningful effect.

Hope this helps.

BOOM!
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 19, 2010, 08:22:45 AM
read this and respond mal

If there are non biased references to JK shootin him self on PURPOSE then its fact. But she threw out there and when cornered on it she tried to just say a bunch of shit...because she knew that if she said "yes he shot him self on purpose" then the next question would be "by whom" ...
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 19, 2010, 08:24:17 AM
LMAO- saying boom whenever you make a stupid remark doesn't create a more dramatic or meaningful effect.

Hope this helps.

BOOM!

hahaha um ok bro...feel better now?
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 19, 2010, 08:43:39 AM
If there are non biased references to JK shootin him self on PURPOSE then its fact. But she threw out there and when cornered on it she tried to just say a bunch of shit...because she knew that if she said "yes he shot him self on purpose" then the next question would be "by whom" ...
a bunch of shit bro he wouldnt let her get 2 words in without interrupting her  ::)

She gave specific names so obviously it would be easy to disprove her...did he?

well then I guess there are NON BIASED references that have reason to believe that he might have caused the wound himself...

dude your so biased its hillarious that was one of the shittiest pieces of gotcha journalism ive ever seen...if thats par for msnbc then you know why they are thought of as a joke...
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 19, 2010, 08:53:47 AM
a bunch of shit bro he wouldnt let her get 2 words in without interrupting her  ::)

She gave specific names so obviously it would be easy to disprove her...did he?

well then I guess there are NON BIASED references that have reason to believe that he might have caused the wound himself...

dude your so biased its hillarious that was one of the shittiest pieces of gotcha journalism ive ever seen...if thats par for msnbc then you know why they are thought of as a joke...

oh im not biased at all..This chick Michelle whatever is awful...
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Soul Crusher on August 19, 2010, 08:55:17 AM
oh im not biased at all..This chick Michelle whatever is awful...

She is not awful - the only reason you don't like her is because she is like a machine gun nailing the far left crooks and hacks left and right. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tallgerman on August 19, 2010, 09:20:11 AM
Chris matthews is an idiot.

The key word of course is intentionally

Kerry coulda accidentally shot himself :)

then claimed he took "shrapnel" in vietnam lol

Kerry lol I went to school with his daughter alexis and what a dog woof!

Thank the stars Kerry got booted.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 12:51:09 PM
And they do what you consider Honest Journalism?

Absolutely.  And, with the exception of C-SPAN, they do it better than everyone else, which is why more people watch them than any other network. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 19, 2010, 01:10:21 PM
Absolutely.  And, with the exception of C-SPAN, they do it better than everyone else, which is why more people watch them than any other network. 
ok
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 01:15:30 PM
ok

And? 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 19, 2010, 02:07:08 PM
HAHAHAHAAH

Yes, Cspan is honest journalism.

EVERYTHING ELSE has a slant on it.  I watched msnbc for a decade before I knew it.  When I started watching fox religiously, I realized "Wow, msn is full of shit on a lot of things".  They're some damn drama queens.

But I also realized FOX is some of the most exaggerative, crybaby, playing the victim d-bags aroudn as well.

LOL @ anyone who believes ANY of the networks (fox, msnbc, or cnn) are objective.   They're all political ENTERTAINMENT and ANALYSIS for people with certain political beliefs.  If you don't realize that, well...
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 02:09:56 PM
 ::)  Horse manure.  They all report the same news. 

The opinion shows are a different story.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Soul Crusher on August 19, 2010, 02:14:24 PM
HAHAHAHAAH

Yes, Cspan is honest journalism.

EVERYTHING ELSE has a slant on it.  I watched msnbc for a decade before I knew it.  When I started watching fox religiously, I realized "Wow, msn is full of shit on a lot of things".  They're some damn drama queens.

But I also realized FOX is some of the most exaggerative, crybaby, playing the victim d-bags aroudn as well.

LOL @ anyone who believes ANY of the networks (fox, msnbc, or cnn) are objective.   They're all political ENTERTAINMENT and ANALYSIS for people with certain political beliefs.  If you don't realize that, well...

Turn off the TV - problem solved. 

I have not cable news in about two years and rely on the radio, internet, etc.  TV is mostly wortheless. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 02:19:07 PM
Turn off the TV - problem solved. 

I have not cable news in about two years and rely on the radio, internet, etc.  TV is mostly wortheless. 

I think there is value in cable news.  I hear stuff there that I don't readily see on the internet or hear on the radio.  Getting the news from multiple sources is best IMO.

I agree most of what they show on TV is garbage.  I have 10,000 channels (no not really) and probably watch less than ten.

For that matter, most of what Hollywood puts out on the big screen is garbage.     
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 19, 2010, 02:20:22 PM
::)  Horse manure.  They all report the same news. 

nah, it's the same way all day too.  the 2pm "interviews" are just as biased, for both networks.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: dantelis on August 19, 2010, 02:28:41 PM
I am surprised that Malkin wrote a book called, In Defense of Internment: The Case for Racial Profiling in World War II and the War on Terror (see http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0895260514/hotair06-20/ref=nosim)  If she had lived in the U.S. during WWII, she would have likely been interred, since the chance any white americans would be able to tell she is Phillipino rather than Japanese is unlikely.  If the terrorists against america today were primarily Asian, Malkin would likely be profiled and get checked every time she set foot in the airport.  (If for no other reason than she is hot and the security guys would want to frisk her thoroughly;-)
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 02:29:51 PM
nah, it's the same way all day too.  the 2pm "interviews" are just as biased, for both networks.

Not true at all.  The news segments of Fox, CNN, and MSNBC by and large report the same stories.  
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 19, 2010, 02:32:01 PM
malkin was one of the original 911 truthers in 2002.  

she's a nutjob guys, deal with it.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 19, 2010, 02:34:34 PM
::)  Horse manure.  They all report the same news. 

The opinion shows are a different story.

really?
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Soul Crusher on August 19, 2010, 02:42:50 PM
really?

As gay as a two dollar bill.  where is Larry Sinclaire to be on the view? 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 03:09:20 PM
malkin was one of the original 911 truthers in 2002.  

she's a nutjob guys, deal with it.

"911 truthers."  lol.   :)

9/11 conspiracy-mongers and the advertisers who love them
By Michelle Malkin  •  April 4, 2007 12:34 PM If you are sick of Rosie O’Donnell pimping the “9/11 was an inside job” crowd,” you might want to stop using the products of advertisers who pimp their wares on The View. Take a cautionary shopping trip with us today at Hot Air (click to watch):




Here’s a Stop Rosie site and here’s a blog tracking The View’s advertisers.

Here’s Popular Mechanics’ smackdown of Rosie in case you missed it.

And here is a stark reminder of who Barbara Walters, ABC, and Disney have allied themselves with:

(http://michellemalkin.com/archives/images/wackjobs.jpg)




(http://michellemalkin.com/archives/images/911lie.jpg)

(http://michellemalkin.com/archives/images/911lie002.jpg)

Enough to give you indigestion. But don’t grab the Pepto Bismol.

They’re a proud sponsor of The 9/11-Denying View.

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/04/04/911-conspiracy-mongers-and-the-advertisers-who-love-them/
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 03:11:27 PM
really?

Really.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Option D on August 19, 2010, 03:13:19 PM
Really.
Amazing
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 03:14:32 PM
Amazing

Not really.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 19, 2010, 03:24:15 PM
she was one of the original truthers in 2002.

she went to the foreign press to write her column, of course.

Read it yourself:
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin030802.asp

Now, did she reverse her position immediately after being hired by fox news?  Sure she did.  Surprised?  LOL...
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 03:30:19 PM
Good Lord.  There is a reason why people in the real world don't talk about this nonsense.  Why Ron Paul asked you nuts to leave him alone.  Why no legitimate presidential candidate, member of Congress, governor, etc. is talking about this.  Why Michelle Malkin thinks you people are nuts.  It's one of the stooooopidest CTs in human history.   ::)   
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 03:38:39 PM
Malkin and a Democrat strategist discussing the crackpot theory.  Note that the Democrat strategist says no serious presidential candidate believed this nonsense. 

[/youtube]
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 03:45:53 PM
Watch the first couple minutes of this clip.  Alex Jones, the leader of the "911 truthers," confronts Michelle Malkin.  He's a screwball. 

[/youtube]
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 19, 2010, 04:46:02 PM
Good Lord.  There is a reason why people in the real world don't talk about this nonsense.  Why Ron Paul asked you nuts to leave him alone.  Why no legitimate presidential candidate, member of Congress, governor, etc. is talking about this.  Why Michelle Malkin thinks you people are nuts.  It's one of the stooooopidest CTs in human history.   ::)   


None of this changes the fact that 6 months after 9/11, this 'woman' was bashing the USA in the foreign press, stirring up all sorts of Qs about how our govt was LYING TO US.

You can cite her 2007 position when she was on FOX's payroll.

However, she was a 911 truther before the Loose Change kids, before France even put out their report on it.  She was one of the first, beach bum.

You can try to paint her "conversion" to FOX mindset as anything you'd like.  It takes serious balls to bash america on foreign soil, but she did it.  If you're okay with that, it's fine, that's your opinion. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 04:49:40 PM

None of this changes the fact that 6 months after 9/11, this 'woman' was bashing the USA in the foreign press, stirring up all sorts of Qs about how our govt was LYING TO US.

You can cite her 2007 position when she was on FOX's payroll.

However, she was a 911 truther before the Loose Change kids, before France even put out their report on it.  She was one of the first, beach bum.

You can try to paint her "conversion" to FOX mindset as anything you'd like.  It takes serious balls to bash america on foreign soil, but she did it.  If you're okay with that, it's fine, that's your opinion. 

One of the things that's so absurd about this is your reference to her employment by Fox News.  As if employees of CNN and MSNBC employees are CT nuts.  They're not.  No serious journalist is.  She could be working for a local station in Mississippi and would still be calling this thing exactly what it is:  crazy. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 19, 2010, 04:51:24 PM
One of the things that's so absurd about this is your reference to her employment by Fox News.  As if employees of CNN and MSNBC employees are CT nuts.  They're not.  No serious journalist is.  She could be working for a local station in Mississippi and would still be calling this thing exactly what it is:  crazy. 

So she was 'crazy' in 2002, and completely sane today?  Is that what you're saying?

That's cool.

Either way, no matter what her message, I disagree with her going to the other side of the planet to bash America in a foreign newspaper.  Real patriotic.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Skeletor on August 19, 2010, 05:09:07 PM
As gay as a two dollar bill.  where is Larry Sinclaire to be on the view? 

Lol, very funny picture!  ;D
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 19, 2010, 05:12:04 PM
oh im not biased at all..This chick Michelle whatever is awful...
LOL i bet you think matthews is not biased either dont you?
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 19, 2010, 05:13:14 PM
malkin was one of the original 911 truthers in 2002.  

she's a nutjob guys, deal with it.
LMAO actually its painfully obvious you bring her up everytime b/c you want to either discredit her or use the fact that she thinks that way to lend credibility to your idiocy...

neither point has anything to do with the topic at hand but then again I wouldnt expect you to stick to the topic at hand...at least you didnt bring up palin in this thread

dumb ass...
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 06:40:56 PM
dumb ass...

Good point.  Trying to discredit her on one hand, and use her to lend credibility to the CT theory on the other. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 19, 2010, 06:47:39 PM
she bashed the us govt and bush - on foreign soil.

just 6 months after 911.

Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Arnold jr on August 19, 2010, 06:57:14 PM
::)  Horse manure.  They all report the same news. 

The opinion shows are a different story.


True to an extent, if there is a plane crash or a bomb goes off somewhere, they all report it but if one of them puts a slant on the story, which MSNBC does on everything, that's when it turns into semi-fake news coverage.

The other thing, some of the news groups seem to choose not to report on certain stories, for instance, the beginning of the Tea Party movement, love it or hate it it's been a significant thing but in the early stages CNN, MSNBC and the 3 major news network refused to cover it with any real coverage.

One of the things I like about Fox is they seem to cover every story regardless of which side of the aisle or which side of public opinion it falls on.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 19, 2010, 07:01:03 PM

True to an extent, if there is a plane crash or a bomb goes off somewhere, they all report it but if one of them puts a slant on the story, which MSNBC does on everything, that's when it turns into semi-fake news coverage.

The other thing, some of the news groups seem to choose not to report on certain stories, for instance, the beginning of the Tea Party movement, love it or hate it it's been a significant thing but in the early stages CNN, MSNBC and the 3 major news network refused to cover it with any real coverage.

One of the things I like about Fox is they seem to cover every story regardless of which side of the aisle or which side of public opinion it falls on.

i disagree.  There have been some stories that made obama/dems look decent in the last 18 months... and FOX will have some video of a high speed chase or "spring break teen girl exploitation" on, while cnn, msn cover the white house story.

They all do it.  I start plenty of threads when it happens.  Dont get me wrong - msn did the exact same thing for 8 years to dubya. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 07:28:06 PM

True to an extent, if there is a plane crash or a bomb goes off somewhere, they all report it but if one of them puts a slant on the story, which MSNBC does on everything, that's when it turns into semi-fake news coverage.

The other thing, some of the news groups seem to choose not to report on certain stories, for instance, the beginning of the Tea Party movement, love it or hate it it's been a significant thing but in the early stages CNN, MSNBC and the 3 major news network refused to cover it with any real coverage.

One of the things I like about Fox is they seem to cover every story regardless of which side of the aisle or which side of public opinion it falls on.

Yeah.  I agree. 
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Arnold jr on August 19, 2010, 07:31:37 PM
i disagree.  There have been some stories that made obama/dems look decent in the last 18 months... and FOX will have some video of a high speed chase or "spring break teen girl exploitation" on, while cnn, msn cover the white house story.

They all do it.  I start plenty of threads when it happens.  Dont get me wrong - msn did the exact same thing for 8 years to dubya. 

I'm sure Fox ignores certain stories just like they all do, it's impossible to cover everything but when it comes to the major events/stories, I've yet to see them simply leave it out.

As for reporting on the good things the Dems or Obama have done, you're right, they haven't reported a lot of that and there's a big reason for that, there really hasn't been anything to report that's a positive...you can't praise them for scoring a touchdown when they've yet to get a first down.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: 240 is Back on August 19, 2010, 07:38:15 PM
I'm sure Fox ignores certain stories just like they all do, it's impossible to cover everything but when it comes to the major events/stories, I've yet to see them simply leave it out.

As for reporting on the good things the Dems or Obama have done, you're right, they haven't reported a lot of that and there's a big reason for that, there really hasn't been anything to report that's a positive...you can't praise them for scoring a touchdown when they've yet to get a first down.

it's like the white house press conferences during the day.  and even at night, actually.

FOX news didn't play the obama conferences much this year, and msn snubbed bush.  At the same time, FOX showed it anytime bush made comments anywhere, and msn covers it when obama walks to a deli. 

They BOTH do it.  I start a lot of threads when I see it - I like to skip around the news channels - and it's like clockwork... "Obama comes to the rose garden to make comments" on msnbc and "18% of americans think obama is a muslim" on FOX.   

I'm not sure ppl saying msn does it (and fox does not) watch BOTH networks.  I do.  I love them both because I know the truth is in the middle.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Dos Equis on August 19, 2010, 07:46:13 PM
it's like the white house press conferences during the day.  and even at night, actually.

FOX news didn't play the obama conferences much this year, and msn snubbed bush.  At the same time, FOX showed it anytime bush made comments anywhere, and msn covers it when obama walks to a deli. 

They BOTH do it.  I start a lot of threads when I see it - I like to skip around the news channels - and it's like clockwork... "Obama comes to the rose garden to make comments" on msnbc and "18% of americans think obama is a muslim" on FOX.   

I'm not sure ppl saying msn does it (and fox does not) watch BOTH networks.  I do.  I love them both because I know the truth is in the middle.

This is so false it's not even funny.  O.k. it's a little funny.   :)  All three networks cover almost every word the president speaks at a national press conference.  They cover pretty much all press conferences by the White House press secretary.  They cover speeches made on campaign stops.  In fact, this morning I watched Fox News cover a meeting Obama had at some family's house, followed by a meeting in some family's backyard.  Saying Fox doesn't cover Obama, or that other networks didn't cover Bush is just not true.

   
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Arnold jr on August 19, 2010, 08:17:54 PM
This is so false it's not even funny.  O.k. it's a little funny.   :)  All three networks cover almost every word the president speaks at a national press conference.  They cover pretty much all press conferences by the White House press secretary.  They cover speeches made on campaign stops.  In fact, this morning I watched Fox News cover a meeting Obama had at some family's house, followed by a meeting in some family's backyard.  Saying Fox doesn't cover Obama, or that other networks didn't cover Bush is just not true.

   

Agreed. MSNBC covered Bush, they had to, it was the only way they could scream and cry about him and Fox covers every step Obama takes, for crying out loud, they covered him swimming the other day.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: MM2K on August 19, 2010, 08:41:29 PM
The liberals and mainstream media are never going to admit that Obama is a failure. That would mean making big asses out of themselves. They took George Bush, who other than Reagan was no worse than any other president we had for the past 35 years, and made him out to be the worst president in history. Then they took Barack Obama and they said he would be the savior of our country in spite of his lack of experience. Now it turns out he is a complete disaster and has taken the flaws of Bush and multiplied them times atleast 4 (4 times the debt).

Im never going to let them forget this. My question is, what is going to happen to outlets such as NBC and MSNBC? Can they survive after an amarassment like this? There is no reason we should still be stuck in the economic doldrums. Bush experienced a lot of bad luck with the bursting of the housing bubble, and Obama was in the lucky position to reign over a strong economic recovery and take credit for it. Instead, he is causing anemic economic growth and we may go into a double dip recession. That alone puts him among the worst presidents of our time.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: tonymctones on August 19, 2010, 08:54:38 PM
The liberals and mainstream media are never going to admit that Obama is a failure. That would mean making big asses out of themselves. They took George Bush, who other than Reagan was no worse than any other president we had for the past 35 years, and made him out to be the worst president in history. Then they took Barack Obama and they said he would be the savior of our country in spite of his lack of experience. Now it turns out he is a complete disaster and has taken the flaws of Bush and multiplied them times atleast 4 (4 times the debt).

Im never going to let them forget this. My question is, what is going to happen to outlets such as NBC and MSNBC? Can they survive after an amarassment like this? There is no reason we should still be stuck in the economic doldrums. Bush experienced a lot of bad luck with the bursting of the housing bubble, and Obama was in the lucky position to reign over a strong economic recovery and take credit for it. Instead, he is causing anemic economic growth and we may go into a double dip recession. That alone puts him among the worst presidents of our time.
Agreed bush didnt cause the melt down(like some would like to believe) and nobody would have forseen the problems and moved to prevent them.

I dont think we will go into a double dip recession at least not in the terms of the last recession but we will likely be stuck in this limbo for quite some time.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: Arnold jr on August 19, 2010, 09:43:54 PM
Agreed bush didnt cause the melt down(like some would like to believe) and nobody would have forseen the problems and moved to prevent them.

Very true, no one saw it coming and Bush was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. If Gore had been elected or Kerry in 02 then we'd still have ended up in the same boat. Our mess is due to paying for our sins of the past, they simply finally caught up to us. And yes, it can be said, Bush didn't help matters any with some of the things done, but our economic state is due to years and years of snowballing to the state we're in now.


I dont think we will go into a double dip recession at least not in the terms of the last recession but we will likely be stuck in this limbo for quite some time.

I hope you're right but all signs point to the whole matter getting worse...except for the signs on the chart Obama recites to us, because those charts are made in magic fairy land.
Title: Re: Michelle Malkin Owns the Ladies of The View
Post by: MCWAY on August 20, 2010, 11:42:30 AM
The liberals and mainstream media are never going to admit that Obama is a failure. That would mean making big asses out of themselves.

TOO LATE!!!



They took George Bush, who other than Reagan was no worse than any other president we had for the past 35 years, and made him out to be the worst president in history. Then they took Barack Obama and they said he would be the savior of our country in spite of his lack of experience. Now it turns out he is a complete disaster and has taken the flaws of Bush and multiplied them times atleast 4 (4 times the debt).

Im never going to let them forget this. My question is, what is going to happen to outlets such as NBC and MSNBC? Can they survive after an amarassment like this? There is no reason we should still be stuck in the economic doldrums. Bush experienced a lot of bad luck with the bursting of the housing bubble, and Obama was in the lucky position to reign over a strong economic recovery and take credit for it. Instead, he is causing anemic economic growth and we may go into a double dip recession. That alone puts him among the worst presidents of our time.

They'll still get thrills up and down their legs and fall prostrate before Obama. But, if the Dems get killed, they'll have those sour-puss looks on their faces, as if someone shot their dog.