Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Option D on August 24, 2010, 08:41:19 AM
-
http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/mon-august-23-2010-rod-blagojevich
Awesome
-
now thats some funny shit :D :D :D :D :D :D :D and also very true
-
We wont hear from the likes of 3333 or tony or billy.....and i know they clicked the thread
-
We wont hear from the likes of 3333 or tony or billy.....and i know they clicked the thread
Maybe because:
1. I don't rely on comedians for news and opinion. This is what those on the left do, everything about whatt hey believe comes from jokes, comedians, etc.
2. I don't watch Fox news and have said so at least 1,456,456 times.
-
Comedy Central kowtowed to Islamic supremacism when they censored the South Park episode about Mohammed (while letting the Buddha get bashed in that same episode. Nor have they ever censored any of the Christians or Jew bashing that goes on in every episode). Why would anyone expect them to allow anything negative to be said about Islam? I didn't bother watching the video so I'm not even referring to that.
-
Comedy Central kowtowed to Islamic supremacism when they censored the South Park episode about Mohammed (while letting the Buddha get bashed in that same episode. Nor have they ever censored any of the Christians or Jew bashing that goes on in every episode). Why would anyone expect them to allow anything negative to be said about Islam? I didn't bother watching the video so I'm not even referring to that.
just watch the clip...
-
Maybe because:
1. I don't rely on comedians for news and opinion. This is what those on the left do, everything about whatt hey believe comes from jokes, comedians, etc.
2. I don't watch Fox news and have said so at least 1,456,456 times.
Easy to try and dismiss it..but watch the clip and see if it isnt atleast interesting. But if its easier for you to dismiss it because of fear of truth..im good with that
-
Easy to try and dismiss it..but watch the clip and see if it isnt atleast interesting. But if its easier for you to dismiss it because of fear of truth..im good with that
I'm not dismissing anything, its just that i don't need comedians and court jesters to come up with my own opnion on things. I read the WSJ, RCP, BI, FR, HP, RCM, Bloomberg, etc and get my info and opnion based on that, not tv.
Other than the Yankees games, I don't watch TV at all.
-
hahahaha awesome stuff!
These fools preach their hatred and intolerance, it's like they want their own form of 'sharia' against islam.
-
hahahaha awesome stuff!
These fools preach their hatred and intolerance, it's like they want their own form of 'sharia' against islam.
Do you have any hard evidence of this hatred and intolerance? Did you know that there were more anti-Christian and anti-Jew attacks in the USA in 2009 than there were anti-Muslim attacks? "Islamophobia" and "hatred of Muslims" is a fabrication of the left.
-
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Now I know where all you liberal morons get your information and talking points.
How can anyone take you bozos seriously? You repeat the same garbage spewed by a stupid comedian who once called Truman a war criminal and ended up having to apologize.
Pitiful.
-
and most of you get your news from some fat drug addict ;D
-
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Now I know where all you liberal morons get your information and talking points.
How can anyone take you bozos seriously? You repeat the same garbage spewed by a stupid comedian who once called Truman a war criminal and ended up having to apologize.
Pitiful.
The far left kooks like Blacken, KC, Straw, and to a lesser extent, Mal, love comedians because everything is a joke to them.
do they ever post articles from WSJ, RCP, Bloomberg, or anything remotely serious? Never. Its all a sophomoric game to them and the idiot who makes them laugh is who they flock to, regardless of anything else.
Hence - why Obama is POTUS - the grandest court jester and comedian of them all.
-
daily show does a good job of pointing out hypocrisy.
FOX has been trashing this 'money man' for months. But they didn't use his name. Pretty funny when daily show points out it's because he's a big shareholder of FOX.
They're all rich fvckers, and we're all poor fvckers. that's all that matters fellahs.
-
they still believe in the myth of trickle down economics
-
We wont hear from the likes of 3333 or tony or billy.....and i know they clicked the thread
LMAO why did I get mentioned in this...ive for the most part stayed out of the mosque BS...
I dont think they should build there but if they have the legal right then go ahead...
its ignorant though to think that this isnt meant to provoke anger and that is meant to build bridges...
at any rate where in the clip am I supposed to watch its a 21 min clip, either give me cliff notes or tell me where to start...
-
the first 11 minutes
-
it's pretty funny, no matter where you stand on the issue. it's more about how FOX made such a HUGE DEAL without naming the moneyman... because it's their moneyman too. The closing handshake pic was classic.
-
HHAHAHAHHA
look mal I like you man you seem like a cool dude and you actually work out which is rare by getbig standards...
but I destroyed blacken when he posted this ignorance and im about to do the same with you....
unless FOX or its parent company issued the stock directly to the prince...FOX has no say in who buys their stock on the open market...
they are partners in another business venture...that has nothing to do with FOX other than murdoch...
-
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Now I know where all you liberal morons get your information and talking points.
How can anyone take you bozos seriously? You repeat the same garbage spewed by a stupid comedian who once called Truman a war criminal and ended up having to apologize.
Pitiful.
Dude...chill out...Just watch the clip
-
they still believe in the myth of trickle down economics
Well we know that Obama and Pelosi are accomplishing Trickle Up Poverty very well with their insane agenda.
-
HHAHAHAHHA
look mal I like you man you seem like a cool dude and you actually work out which is rare by getbig standards...
but I destroyed blacken when he posted this ignorance and im about to do the same with you....
unless FOX or its parent company issued the stock directly to the prince...FOX has no say in who buys their stock on the open market...
they are partners in another business venture...that has nothing to do with FOX other than murdoch...
Ah haaaa....But this the only thing...Why dont they say his name when talking about him...they dig deep in some areas but not all of them?
-
The far left kooks like Blacken, KC, Straw, and to a lesser extent, Mal, love comedians because everything is a joke to them.
do they ever post articles from WSJ, RCP, Bloomberg, or anything remotely serious? Never. Its all a sophomoric game to them and the idiot who makes them laugh is who they flock to, regardless of anything else.
Hence - why Obama is POTUS - the grandest court jester and comedian of them all.
Na its not like that...I watch daily show because i like when he fucks with Beck..its hilarious..
But that dosent make the facts wrong because of who it came from.
-
LMAO why did I get mentioned in this...ive for the most part stayed out of the mosque BS...
I dont think they should build there but if they have the legal right then go ahead...
its ignorant though to think that this isnt meant to provoke anger and that is meant to build bridges...
at any rate where in the clip am I supposed to watch its a 21 min clip, either give me cliff notes or tell me where to start...
im just fuckin around...you did stay out of the mosque shit.
-
Ah haaaa....But this the only thing...Why dont they say his name when talking about him...they dig deep in some areas but not all of them?
Why doesn't the AP acknowledge that a Muslim owns the controlling interest in it? How come the NY Times and other MSM news organizations refuse to acknowledge the fact that they have former CAIR lobbyists working as "objective" journalists on their payrolls now? It goes both ways and they equally suck.
-
Ah haaaa....But this the only thing...Why dont they say his name when talking about him...they dig deep in some areas but not all of them?
to what end...
again FOX has nothing to do with the prince other than he ON HIS OWN...went and bought their stock...
AGAIN FOX cannot determine who buys or doesnt buy their stock....
this is like saying that American Airlines was somehow involved in 9/11 b/c their planes were used ::) ::) ::)
they didnt have anything to do with those morons hijacking the planes just like FOX had nothing to do with the prince buying their stock... ;)
-
to what end...
again FOX has nothing to do with the prince other than he ON HIS OWN...went and bought their stock...
AGAIN FOX cannot determine who buys or doesnt buy their stock....
this is like saying that American Airlines was somehow involved in 9/11 b/c their planes were used ::) ::) ::)
they didnt have anything to do with those morons hijacking the planes just like FOX had nothing to do with the prince buying their stock... ;)
Or did Fox not name him because he was their boss. Also...did you see the buddy buddy picture of him and RM?
-
Why doesn't the AP acknowledge that a Muslim owns the controlling interest in it? How come the NY Times and other MSM news organizations refuse to acknowledge the fact that they have former CAIR lobbyists working as "objective" journalists on their payrolls now? It goes both ways and they equally suck.
-
Or did Fox not name him because he was their boss. Also...did you see the buddy buddy picture of him and RM?
LMAO being a stock holder in a publicly traded company doesnt make him their boss ;) it makes him an investor...LOL big difference bro
Again RM and his seperate business venture has nothing to do with FOX news...
that is a seperate business venture independent of FOX news...
-
LMAO being a stock holder in a publicly traded company doesnt make him their boss ;) it makes him an investor...LOL big difference bro
Again RM and his seperate business venture has nothing to do with FOX news...
that is a seperate business venture independent of FOX news...
No no no...being a stock holder in a publicly traded company makes you part owner right. Might not have a controlling interest, but as a 7% share holder, his voice is heard at the shareholders meeting...am i right?
-
LMAO being a stock holder in a publicly traded company doesnt make him their boss ;) it makes him an investor...LOL big difference bro
Again RM and his seperate business venture has nothing to do with FOX news...
that is a seperate business venture independent of FOX news...
Fox and the Murdoch family are also huge investors in his Saudi Arabian media properties. So, yes, they are, in fact, business partners.
-
No no no...being a stock holder in a publicly traded company makes you part owner right. Might not have a controlling interest, but as a 7% share holder, his voice is heard at the shareholders meeting...am i right?
LOL that in no way what so ever qualifies him as their boss ::) ::) ::)
he has the right to state his opinion, he has no control what so ever of FOX itself
-
Fox and the Murdoch family are also huge investors in his Saudi Arabian media properties. So, yes, they are, in fact, business partners.
RM are partners...just b/c a person owns a bunch of companies doesnt mean that those seperate companies are partners...
i havent seen any evidence that FOX and the prince are partners...only that RM and the prince are partners..
there is a difference
-
tony,
do you think FOX has gone out of their way NOT to name the money man - because he happens to own 7% of their company?
or do you just think it's a coincidence?
-
Why doesn't the AP acknowledge that a Muslim owns the controlling interest in it? How come the NY Times and other MSM news organizations refuse to acknowledge the fact that they have former CAIR lobbyists working as "objective" journalists on their payrolls now? It goes both ways and they equally suck.
-
tony,
do you think FOX has gone out of their way NOT to name the money man - because he happens to own 7% of their company?
or do you just think it's a coincidence?
Who cares - I tell everyone - SHUT THE DAMN TV OFF AND THINK FOR YOURSELF!
Fox is horrible, as is MSNBC, et al.
The a.m. radio and internet is where the real action is.
-
RM are partners...just b/c a person owns a bunch of companies doesnt mean that those seperate companies are partners...
i havent seen any evidence that FOX and the prince are partners...only that RM and the prince are partners..
there is a difference
Newscorp , the corporation that own Fox News, has a huge stake in the prince's Saudi Business interests. The prince has a significant stake in Newscorp. So, no it's not an issue of random investors that have nothing to do with each other. They are business partners. Using their logic, the same "dirty money" standards would apply to them. They refrained from naming the Saudi prince because they realized this.
-
Who cares - I tell everyonjavascript:void(0);e - SHUT THE DAMN TV OFF AND THINK FOR YOURSELF!
Fox is horrible, as is MSNBC, et al.
The a.m. radio and internet is where the real action is.
You've posted television clips of Peter Schiff and praised Glen Beck's show before. ::) No medium is good or bad, in and of itself. Except for AM radio... which is the tool of the devil.
-
You've posted television clips of Peter Schiff and praised Glen Beck's show before. ::) No medium is good or bad, in and of itself. Except for AM radio... which is the tool of the devil.
1. Ha ha ha. most of my Schiff clips are from him in his office.
2. Praising Beck? Only when he exposes the communists in obamas admn.
3. AM radio is awesome. I learn more at night from John Batchelor from 9-12 in one night than you libs will in 5 years watchingh MSNBC.
-
No no no...being a stock holder in a publicly traded company makes you part owner right. Might not have a controlling interest, but as a 7% share holder, his voice is heard at the shareholders meeting...am i right?
Yes he is a part owner. He has zero control over the corporation if he owns seven percent. If he owned 51 percent, yes he would have "control" to a degree. But what this doesn't show is any control over whatever Fox News broadcasts. Really poor connection.
-
Why doesn't the AP acknowledge that a Muslim owns the controlling interest in it? How come the NY Times and other MSM news organizations refuse to acknowledge the fact that they have former CAIR lobbyists working as "objective" journalists on their payrolls now? It goes both ways and they equally suck.
Somehow these questions continues to be ignored. Good point Berzerk.
-
Yes he is a part owner. He has zero control over the corporation if he owns seven percent. If he owned 51 percent, yes he would have "control" to a degree. But what this doesn't show is any control over whatever Fox News broadcasts. Really poor connection.
I wasn't trying to show that he had any control or influence over what appears on the air at Fox and neither was that Daily Show clip. The point was that Fox hosts were attempting to mount a fear campaign against Imam based on a business alliance that they share. They kept the connection quiet, not because of his influence, but because if they'd revealed it their viewers would have either had to conclude that it was a bullshit connection or they were also linked to dirty money.
-
Yes he is a part owner. He has zero control over the corporation if he owns seven percent. If he owned 51 percent, yes he would have "control" to a degree. But what this doesn't show is any control over whatever Fox News broadcasts. Really poor connection.
what in sam hill are you talking about...thats exactly what i said..and 1 person with 7% of a billion dollar company.,..believe you me...he has a voice at the shareholders meeting...just face it...fox news again is on some bullshit..you can slice it any way you want...
-
I wasn't trying to show that he had any control or influence over what appears on the air at Fox and neither was that Daily Show clip. The point was that Fox hosts were attempting to mount a fear campaign against Imam based on a business alliance that they share. They kept the connection quiet, not because of his influence, but because if they'd revealed it their viewers would have either had to conclude that it was a bullshit connection or they were also linked to dirty money.
? I was responding to mal's post about ownership.
I didn't watch the clip.
-
http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/mon-august-23-2010-rod-blagojevich
Awesome
Hahahaaa Fox News is building the Mosque!!! Hahahaaaaa
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
-
Somehow these questions continues to be ignored. Good point Berzerk.
No, it's a terrible point. It's not even the same thing. None of these companies have tried to link other organizations to terror based on financial alliances that they also have.
-
Hahahaaa Fox News is building the Mosque!!! Hahahaaaaa
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Who would have guessed, the board clown responds to a comedian. ::) ::)
-
what in sam hill are you talking about...thats exactly what i said..and 1 person with 7% of a billion dollar company.,..believe you me...he has a voice at the shareholders meeting...just face it...fox news again is on some bullshit..you can slice it any way you want...
He has a "voice" at shareholders meetings? O.K. No argument there. This establishes what exactly?
Shareholders meetings are typically held once a year. If you're talking about control, you'd have to look more at the board of directors and to a lesser extent the officers.
-
tony,
do you think FOX has gone out of their way NOT to name the money man - because he happens to own 7% of their company?
or do you just think it's a coincidence?
This is great !!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D
Fox News funding a "terror mosque" !!! Hahahaaaaaaaaa
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
-
Why doesn't the AP acknowledge that a Muslim owns the controlling interest in it?
source ???
-
Why doesn't the AP acknowledge that a Muslim owns the controlling interest in it?
source ???
Fox News= Muslim owned
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
Fox News= Muslim owned
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
So then you fools on the left should love it.
-
tony,
do you think FOX has gone out of their way NOT to name the money man - because he happens to own 7% of their company?
or do you just think it's a coincidence?
I have no illusions about them intentionally not broadcasting this but that is b/c liberal morons like many on this board would use it out of context...
FOX has nothing to do with this guy other than him being an investor in them and their parent company being a business partner with him...
FOX has no control over either one of them...
-
Newscorp , the corporation that own Fox News, has a huge stake in the prince's Saudi Business interests. The prince has a significant stake in Newscorp. So, no it's not an issue of random investors that have nothing to do with each other. They are business partners. Using their logic, the same "dirty money" standards would apply to them. They refrained from naming the Saudi prince because they realized this.
LOL so b/c a person buys stock in a company...again ive explained many times how FOX cannot prevent someone from buying stock on the open market
and b/c FOX news parent company has business relations with this guy...again ive explained how FOX news has no control over its parent company
LOL somehow you guys draw a line that FOX news is contributing to this mosque?
-
LOL the video clip and these responses are prime examples of the idiocy I was referring to 240...
Why doesn't the AP acknowledge that a Muslim owns the controlling interest in it?
source ???
This is great !!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D
Fox News funding a "terror mosque" !!! Hahahaaaaaaaaa
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
what in sam hill are you talking about...thats exactly what i said..and 1 person with 7% of a billion dollar company.,..believe you me...he has a voice at the shareholders meeting...just face it...fox news again is on some bullshit..you can slice it any way you want...
-
Why doesn't the AP acknowledge that a Muslim owns the controlling interest in it?
i'll ask again since you didn't answer the first time, where do you get your information from
-
Why doesn't the AP acknowledge that a Muslim owns the controlling interest in it?
i'll ask again since you didn't answer the first time, where do you get your information from
LMAO b/c 7% isnt a controlling interest :D :D :D
this is one of the reasons why they didnt mention this b/c morons like you would twist and spin this like you and your bretheren are doing now without understanding the facts...
but hey as always with you guys...dont let facts get in the way :D ;)