Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: musclecenter on August 31, 2010, 08:05:40 AM

Title: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: musclecenter on August 31, 2010, 08:05:40 AM
"John Simmons 202",which will be held in Detroit,MICHIGAN,Sep 17-18.
And top 3 will be qualified for Olympia 202 Showdown this year. 

Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: wes on August 31, 2010, 08:42:32 AM
Lo0oks great!
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Howard on August 31, 2010, 09:01:12 AM
THAT is a classic , ripped physique.
Perfect example of why the natty ve drugged deal is NOT the big concern.
The real issue for me is looking like a freak vs having a great PHYSIQUE.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Tito24 on August 31, 2010, 09:02:41 AM
too bad its archieved with drugs
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: musclecenter on August 31, 2010, 09:41:34 AM


Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jaejonna on August 31, 2010, 10:17:42 AM
Jumpstart to follow suit soon ..
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Omega on August 31, 2010, 10:44:14 AM
I think the guy is a great package overall and has a great physique.
You can see the GH welts however on the midsection.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: TacoBell on August 31, 2010, 10:47:56 AM
Hi jumpstart
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Ron on August 31, 2010, 10:05:22 PM

At this rate, we will see Stan on the Olympia 202lb and Under stage.  If he stays in shape, he can rival some of the top guys
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: BIG ACH on August 31, 2010, 10:16:34 PM

One of my fave bodbuilders!  looks great!
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Emmortal on August 31, 2010, 10:18:54 PM
I think the guy is a great package overall and has a great physique.
You can see the GH welts however on the midsection.

Those are fat deposits that show up when you get lean, nothing to do with GH welts  ::)
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: saucetradomous on August 31, 2010, 10:52:47 PM
I remember reading an old issue of flex talking about Dave henrys loss to mcquay.  Now look at Henry, I don't think mcquay could or is willing to try to compete at that level
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: KevinP85 on August 31, 2010, 11:21:40 PM
I remember reading an old issue of flex talking about Dave henrys loss to mcquay.  Now look at Henry, I don't think mcquay could or is willing to try to compete at that level


True, but the amount of exposure, cover shots, celebrity training, lifestyle, I am sure McQuay doesn't care. He makes very good money and most likely more than a lot of top pros as well. Him competing is just for the notoriety and further exposure.

I like his Audi R8 he has lol
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: wes on September 01, 2010, 01:00:47 AM
I think the guy is a great package overall and has a great physique.
You can see the GH welts however on the midsection.
RIDICULOUS!!
 ::)
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Omega on September 01, 2010, 05:17:25 AM
Those are fat deposits that show up when you get lean, nothing to do with GH welts  ::)

I got welts weirdly enough. Maybe it was fat deposits then.
I remember seeing pics of Sean Allen and ppl said that he had GH welts.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 01, 2010, 05:22:21 AM
very "pretty"  physique.......he is about as muscular as you can be, with the girls still liking it (i know there are some girls into huge guys)

but im talking regular girls............stan's physique they would still find attractive. once you start getting bigger and more extreme., girls tend to bow out
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 01, 2010, 05:23:39 AM
btw.........this show will be an epic fail


a 202 show in detroit............there will be no second year
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: g101 on September 01, 2010, 09:24:00 AM
very "pretty"  physique.......he is about as muscular as you can be, with the girls still liking it (i know there are some girls into huge guys)

but im talking regular girls............stan's physique they would still find attractive. once you start getting bigger and more extreme., girls tend to bow out

that's true his physique is still in the "likeable"..  bigger and more extreme gets you negative comments
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: SammyDaBull on September 01, 2010, 04:27:22 PM
I think the guy is a great package overall and has a great physique.
You can see the GH welts however on the midsection.

Come on man, don't come on here and post stupid remarks that make absolutely no sense. You don't get welts from GH.... those are clearly fat nodules. Stan has a very clean, classic physique. Much respect to what this guys has done with his career. Kevin English may be bigger and may be the 202 Olympia Champ.... but he has done nothing more for the sport except hold that title. Best of luck to Stan!

dabull
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Chick on September 01, 2010, 04:35:35 PM
Come on man, don't come on here and post stupid remarks that make absolutely no sense. You don't get welts from GH.... those are clearly fat nodules. Stan has a very clean, classic physique. Much respect to what this guys has done with his career. Kevin English may be bigger and may be the 202 Olympia Champ.... but he has done nothing more for the sport except hold that title. Best of luck to Stan!

dabull

Actually, what they are is the areas where veins form a "intersection"...you'll see them on pretty much any BB with good conditioning...
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 01, 2010, 04:42:00 PM
Come on man, don't come on here and post stupid remarks that make absolutely no sense. You don't get welts from GH.... those are clearly fat nodules. Stan has a very clean, classic physique. Much respect to what this guys has done with his career. Kevin English may be bigger and may be the 202 Olympia Champ.... but he has done nothing more for the sport except hold that title. Best of luck to Stan!

dabull


LOL.............HI STAN or stans training partner



you dumfuck.............do you not realize how translucent it is when you have ZERO posts, then all of a sudden jump on here and pen a paragraph defending the honor or a specific bodybuilder



its SO pathetic how these PROS and their minions scan getbig ALL DAY looking to see if they have been mentioned in a thread




and to answer your post............i agree with you in the sense that NO, those nodules are not GH welts, only an idiot would think that

but likewise., dont try to act like your boy doesnt use HGH, and that it would be an insult to say he uses HGH ::) ::)
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: che on September 01, 2010, 04:42:46 PM
Actually, what they are is the areas where veins form a "intersection"...you'll see them on pretty much any BB with good conditioning...
Exactly I have them in my arms and legs .
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Stavios on September 01, 2010, 07:31:24 PM
he looked his best as a middleweight, he needs to get that super ripped look once again even if it means being 180-185 lbs onstage
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Hurricane Beef ! on September 01, 2010, 08:34:34 PM
Love this cat . . . claimed to be a natural and was exposed by his supplier (  who he owed money of some shit ) on ProfessionalMuscle who sold him GH for years.

THE BEEF
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: flexingtonsteele on September 01, 2010, 10:44:46 PM
he looked his best as a middleweight, he needs to get that super ripped look once again even if it means being 180-185 lbs onstage
i think he only weighed 190 or something like that at the 202 show he won last year. and he could have been ALOT tighter.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Azn Muscle on September 01, 2010, 11:36:52 PM
Stan looks great but if u think he is natural ur probably gonna OD on your cell-tech hardcore soon.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Omega on September 02, 2010, 12:33:07 AM
Come on man, don't come on here and post stupid remarks that make absolutely no sense. You don't get welts from GH.... those are clearly fat nodules. Stan has a very clean, classic physique. Much respect to what this guys has done with his career. Kevin English may be bigger and may be the 202 Olympia Champ.... but he has done nothing more for the sport except hold that title. Best of luck to Stan!

dabull

Actually, what they are is the areas where veins form a "intersection"...you'll see them on pretty much any BB with good conditioning...

LOL @ SammyDaBull
Who looks stupid now..

I actually admitted that i was wrong but it was something which I read on here.
And there is such a thing as welts which happen localised at the area of inj to some people.

Well I take solace in the fact I must have been in decent condition as well then.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 03, 2010, 07:08:14 PM
hey guys, how is everyone here?
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: LATS on September 03, 2010, 07:30:10 PM
i hope that howard was not insinuating that stan is natural.. that ship sailed years ago..
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: titusisback on September 03, 2010, 09:08:28 PM
   .
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 04, 2010, 10:19:37 AM
is stan competing this fall?
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 04, 2010, 02:16:48 PM
I do beleive he's competing in november!
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: G_Thang on September 04, 2010, 02:32:29 PM
why does this guy bother?  doesnt he make good money training doc dre and others?
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: axestream on September 04, 2010, 02:51:32 PM
i hope that howard was not insinuating that stan is natural.. that ship sailed years ago..

I thought his point was you can juice...even become a pro and look still great.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Bobby on September 04, 2010, 03:24:12 PM
I do beleive he's competing in november!
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=346781.0;attach=381782;image)


His chest is starting to hang down, wtf is that and why? gyno, or some other side effect of teh juice?
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 04, 2010, 03:25:06 PM
stan is the best in the buiness!
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Bobby on September 04, 2010, 03:27:34 PM
very "pretty"  physique.......he is about as muscular as you can be, with the girls still liking it (i know there are some girls into huge guys)

but im talking regular girls............stan's physique they would still find attractive. once you start getting bigger and more extreme., girls tend to bow out

True, but some would still find him to be too big :-\
But lean like that at 180-190lbs at a normal height is a pretty good allround physique, not too big, not too small.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: dustin on September 04, 2010, 04:08:19 PM
Love this cat . . . claimed to be a natural and was exposed by his supplier (  who he owed money of some shit ) on ProfessionalMuscle who sold him GH for years.

THE BEEF

LMFAO

Do you have a link to the thread? That's funny shit. I don't think he says he's natural anymore, just dodges the bullet after he got his pro card...
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: axestream on September 04, 2010, 04:59:07 PM
stan is the best in the buiness!

Wider than Phil Heath.  :P
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 04, 2010, 05:58:11 PM
stan may not be mr.o type but he's still good!
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: arce1988 on September 04, 2010, 06:30:48 PM
he have a stroke? his eyes look like Forest Whitaker
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 05:20:43 AM
he have a stroke? his eyes look like Forest Whitaker
forest whitaker??
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 06:03:33 AM
no.6
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 06:07:11 AM
no.7
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 06:11:04 AM
no.8
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 06:18:09 AM
no. 9
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 06:24:10 AM
no.10
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 06:30:32 AM
no.11
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 07:29:19 AM
no.12
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 05, 2010, 07:38:44 AM
no.12


this isnt a schmoe site you disgusting old queer.........taker you man-lust and your musclegallery pics.........and fuckind die





really, i mean it.........DIE


dont ever post here again you awful old queen
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 08:55:50 AM
no.13
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 02:00:22 PM
no.14
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: arce1988 on September 05, 2010, 02:03:00 PM
http://www.ratewall.com/cpics/forest_whitaker.jpg
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 02:29:10 PM
no.15
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: wes on September 05, 2010, 02:48:45 PM
Here we go with this half `o fag posting yet another zillion shots of his wet dreamboy!
  ::)
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Flexb on September 05, 2010, 02:55:16 PM
"John Simmons 202",which will be held in Detroit,MICHIGAN,Sep 17-18.
And top 3 will be qualified for Olympia 202 Showdown this year. 



That's exactly what I would like (ab wise) to look like 24-7. Too bad I like my junk food too much and don't do cardio at all. I should have a 30 inch waist but 34 is where it's at with my lifestyle and food choice.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: GroinkTropin on September 05, 2010, 03:23:48 PM
Actually, what they are is the areas where veins form a "intersection"...you'll see them on pretty much any BB with good conditioning...

This would be correct and surprising coming from you. Did not realize you have some anatomy under your belt.
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Stavios on September 05, 2010, 03:26:06 PM
One day I hope to look like Stan and that day, I'll be even more of a pussy magnet
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Stavios on September 05, 2010, 03:29:07 PM
i think he only weighed 190 or something like that at the 202 show he won last year. and he could have been ALOT tighter.

yeah check out the shots on repetrope from the 04 nationals he looked crazy at 176
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 07:40:29 PM
no.16
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: GroinkTropin on September 05, 2010, 08:15:45 PM
no.16

Two questions- what is his bodyfat here, and can this be done without GH?
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 08:36:55 PM
no.17
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 09:12:33 PM
what the hell happened to stan's relationship to amanda carrier? They were such a lovely couple together!
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: Flexb on September 05, 2010, 09:13:58 PM
no.17

Slurp :D
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 05, 2010, 09:35:07 PM
no.18
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: G_Thang on September 06, 2010, 11:12:33 AM
jumpstart get the vid and stop posing his damn photos.  women dont even get tributes on this board anymore.  ::)

Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 06, 2010, 04:18:32 PM
no.19
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: jumpstart on September 06, 2010, 09:34:40 PM
no.20
Title: Re: Stan McQuay 4 weeks out from John Simmons 202
Post by: dave19 on September 07, 2010, 12:25:05 AM
Two questions- what is his bodyfat here, and can this be done without GH?

He's very lean there but hard to tell without seeing the whole body .. but probably near contest-condition and def. below 8% BF.

You don't need GH to get ripped , you can get just as ripped without GH as you could with, it just makes it easier.