Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MB_722 on September 11, 2010, 10:02:14 PM

Title: Which one would you take??
Post by: MB_722 on September 11, 2010, 10:02:14 PM
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/581722958_scan-01.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/1230084381_scan-02.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/621260827_scan-05.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/199003837_scan-08.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/2146337758_scan-11.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/237248864_scan-13.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/970005536_scan-18.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/798955313_scan-15.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/1260748690_scan-19.jpg)

or

(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1281126265-fachada-entorno-1.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1281126216-fachada-anochecer-29.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1281126235-fachada-anochecer-panorama-1.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1281126080-cuarto-3.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1281126058-cocina-7.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1281126173-fachada-anochecer-19-.jpg)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1281126025-area-social-34.jpg)
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Lundgren on September 11, 2010, 10:15:23 PM
Is their summer in this place of snow? Or is it the only inhabitated place  in the world that got year round snow. If it's sweden/canada count me in. I like having two seasons.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: MB_722 on September 11, 2010, 10:16:49 PM
first one is Switzerland. second one is Costa Rica.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Flexb on September 11, 2010, 10:19:49 PM
Costa Rica. Fuk the snowy mountain shit. Looks depressing to me, as nice as the place is
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: SF1900 on September 11, 2010, 10:20:16 PM
Goodrums place.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: clued-up on September 11, 2010, 10:24:48 PM
This one

(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1281126265-fachada-entorno-1.jpg)

(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/1281126235-fachada-anochecer-panorama-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: benchmstr on September 11, 2010, 10:25:50 PM
i want the 1st house...on the  2nd houses property...

bench
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: tallgerman on September 11, 2010, 10:26:18 PM
warm one duh

Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Lundgren on September 11, 2010, 10:33:42 PM
Meh If just for a visit costa rica. But in the long term the alps. I've hear the swiss are no where new as great as america but, I''ll take it anyday over bugs, sweaty balls, and coke fiends.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Tito24 on September 12, 2010, 03:38:46 AM
first one looks a bit too cold
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: webcake on September 12, 2010, 04:59:33 AM
well i am a getbigger afterall......so i shall take both.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Parker on September 12, 2010, 05:09:17 AM
 place in Costa Rica. Sure there might be bugs, scorpions, venomous spiders, snakes but the wildlife and the view is worth it. Plus, Latin Women. You'd have more stories than sitting around ice and snow all day, unless you want to lift weights during a blizzard
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: JasonH on September 12, 2010, 05:28:01 AM
Second one definitely.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Purple Aki on September 12, 2010, 05:44:38 AM
Owning a gucci chalet in Switzerland is going to get you a much better class of vagina than the place in the third world.

Swiss chick:

(http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00185/F_200610_October20e_185887a.jpg)

Costa Rican chick:

(http://www.amazon-tribes.com/Amazon-Women-Child.jpg)
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: G_Thang on September 12, 2010, 05:46:16 AM
swiss n hingis
(http://www.live4ever.us/uploaded_images/MartinaHingis002-776967.jpg)
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Lundgren on September 12, 2010, 05:51:25 AM
Owning a gucci chalet in Switzerland is going to get you a much better class of vagina than the place in the third world.

Swiss chick:

(http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00185/F_200610_October20e_185887a.jpg)

Costa Rican chick:

(http://www.amazon-tribes.com/Amazon-Women-Child.jpg)
This thread separates  the nords from the wannabe's. Not to mention your at heart of Europe, You can be anywhere in europe within a day.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Fatpanda on September 12, 2010, 05:57:17 AM
swiss pine tree house for me- good chocolate, good watches, good knives, good women, never at war.

costa rica - bugs, sweat, hurricanes, drug barons, beggars, women a little behind the times i.e. hairy legs and armpits  :-X

both look nice though.

how much to but these  ?
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: G_Thang on September 12, 2010, 05:57:25 AM
place in Costa Rica. Sure there might be bugs, scorpions, venomous spiders, snakes but the wildlife and the view is worth it. Plus, Latin Women. You'd have more stories than sitting around ice and snow all day, unless you want to lift weights during a blizzard

i think you're confusing Costa with Puerto.  CRs = Hondurans = I grew up with many, many, many, many. = nothing much to write about = not all Latinos are created equal like comparing shitty North American white women vs Nordic  = Mexicans  :(  
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: CC973 on September 12, 2010, 06:00:22 AM
the spot in costa rica...cold and snow sucks ass.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Parker on September 12, 2010, 06:01:43 AM
This thread separates  the nords from the wannabe's. Not to mention your at heart of Europe, You can be anywhere in europe within a day.
Possibly not from that place, look around that Chalet

but, if we go by that logic, one could be anywhere in S. America, N. America, Central America in a day

and get better quality drugs as well...

And Purple Aki knows that those are tribal Meso-Americans, but I bet they might be knowledgable and helpful than the locals in snow land...
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Lundgren on September 12, 2010, 06:05:17 AM
Possibly not from that place, look around that Chalet

but, if we go by that logic, one could be anywhere in S. America, N. America, Central America in a day

and get better quality drugs as well...

And Purple Aki knows that those are tribal Meso-Americans, but I bet they might be knowledgable and helpful than the locals in snow land...
It's the alps, it's the size of new hampshure. There no way it can be more than a 100 miles from Austria,Italy,France or Germany. 
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Purple Aki on September 12, 2010, 06:08:40 AM
Possibly not from that place, look around that Chalet

but, if we go by that logic, one could be anywhere in S. America, N. America, Central America in a day

and get better quality drugs as well...

And Purple Aki knows that those are tribal Meso-Americans
, but I bet they might be knowledgable and helpful than the locals in snow land...

Hah! When I googled "Costa rican" women I got chicks like these:

(http://www.grupo-utopia.com/blog/isou/New%20Zelmira%20Shots/011.jpg)

which doesn't help my argument. So, I had to cheat and use images of "amazonian women".
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Parker on September 12, 2010, 06:31:44 AM
Hah! When I googled "Costa rican" women I got chicks like these:

(http://www.grupo-utopia.com/blog/isou/New%20Zelmira%20Shots/011.jpg)

which doesn't help my argument. So, I had to cheat and use images of "amazonian women".
Ha ;)
It's the alps, it's the size of new hampshure. There no way it can be more than a 100 miles from Austria,Italy,France or Germany. 
You have weather conditions, roads could be blocked, snowed in, then transportation...me personally, snow is only good for getting off of work, being snowed in with a significant other...that's about it.

But, that Chalet reminds of the house this dude built in Alaska, there was a PBS special on this man, lived by himself and filmed for 20 some yrs...grizzlies, deer, hunting, making his cabin
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: dr.chimps on September 12, 2010, 06:40:03 AM
No surprise: I'll take the jungle abode.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Parker on September 12, 2010, 07:04:46 AM
No surprise: I'll take the jungle abode.
"Jungle Boogie, get down, get down"

the Swiss looks like someone took The Boxcar Children quite literally.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Luolamies on September 12, 2010, 07:49:07 AM
First place easily. Switzerland is a country where EVERYTHING works, cops aren't corrupted, food doesn't equal food poisoning, nobody begs on the streets, people aren't starving and nobody will target you for being a wealthy European... As far as snow and winter goes i don't get cold, at all and i do like the fresh clean air so that to me is actually a plus.

Second place, middle of the jungle in the 3rd world, I'd propably be dead inside a year...

Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Tito24 on September 12, 2010, 07:55:52 AM
haha its in sierra leone
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Fatpanda on September 12, 2010, 07:56:31 AM
First place easily. Switzerland is a country where EVERYTHING works, cops aren't corrupted, food doesn't equal food poisoning, nobody begs on the streets, people aren't starving and nobody will target you for being a wealthy European... As far as snow and winter goes i don't get cold, at all and i do like the fresh clean air so that to me is actually a plus.

Second place, middle of the jungle in the 3rd world, I'd propably be dead inside a year...



x2
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Parker on September 12, 2010, 08:01:49 AM
First place easily. Switzerland is a country where EVERYTHING works, cops aren't corrupted, food doesn't equal food poisoning, nobody begs on the streets, people aren't starving and nobody will target you for being a wealthy European... As far as snow and winter goes i don't get cold, at all and i do like the fresh clean air so that to me is actually a plus.

Second place, middle of the jungle in the 3rd world, I'd propably be dead inside a year...


You make it seem like a Utopia, anywhere there are cops, then they are corrupted, look at that place again...out in the middle



of nowhere...both places, you'd get cabin fever. Plus, the abundant of flora and fauna can't compare to the Costa Rican jungle, shit you do your exploring right, you might find a cure for some type of disease (or


catch one)...tons more to do, to find, to explore in the Jungle.



Fresh air is everywhere, and the rain forest is where the fresh air comes from



oh, and the Nazis sure did use that Swiss "neutrality" thing...put all that Jewish money, paintings, gold in Swiss bank accounts---the Swiss:"We bend over for anybody" 
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Immortal_Technique on September 12, 2010, 08:16:04 AM
If you choose the first place watch out for these guys.

(http://moviesmedia.ign.com/movies/image/article/993/993287/dead-snow-20090609055033188_640w.jpg)
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: dr.chimps on September 12, 2010, 08:30:33 AM
"Jungle Boogie, get down, get down"

the Swiss looks like someone took The Boxcar Children quite literally.
Daaaaamn Right!

Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: G_Thang on September 12, 2010, 08:34:16 AM
(http://accel15.mettre-put-idata.over-blog.com/0/00/51/81/people/martina_hingis.jpg)
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Luolamies on September 12, 2010, 08:41:41 AM
You make it seem like a Utopia, anywhere there are cops, then they are corrupted, look at that place again...out in the middle



of nowhere...both places, you'd get cabin fever. Plus, the abundant of flora and fauna can't compare to the Costa Rican jungle, shit you do your exploring right, you might find a cure for some type of disease (or


catch one)...tons more to do, to find, to explore in the Jungle.



Fresh air is everywhere, and the rain forest is where the fresh air comes from



oh, and the Nazis sure did use that Swiss "neutrality" thing...put all that Jewish money, paintings, gold in Swiss bank accounts---the Swiss:"We bend over for anybody" 

Well in many ways it is utopia. Sure there might be some corrupted cops, but if you need them to help you they won't bill you on the spot (or at all for that matter). I live in Finland so i've been to places like that and i've never gotten cabin fever, the peace and silence is really a good thing (for me). That picture shows like there's nothing but snow, but i bet it's actually pretty close to everything (same as here). There is no lack of flora or fauna and when the summer comes the nature wakes up and everything is awesome. Of course there's a million cool things in Costa Rica as well, but for me being in the middle of the jungle with allergies and asthma doesn't sound appealing. I have traveled very extensively and exotic places are awesome to visit, but it would be hard to imagine living there and if or when you get in trouble your pretty much on your own. And yes, the rainforest makes the air but again me in the middle of it... Bad news...
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Fury on September 12, 2010, 08:44:14 AM
Costa Rica without a doubt. Not that the house in Switzerland is bad.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Tito24 on September 12, 2010, 09:45:57 AM
costa rica is not islamic
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Hereford on September 12, 2010, 09:59:15 AM
I'd go for the Swiss abode.

Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: chaos on September 12, 2010, 10:05:38 AM
You make it seem like a Utopia, anywhere there are cops, then they are corrupted, look at that place again...out in the middle



of nowhere...both places, you'd get cabin fever. Plus, the abundant of flora and fauna can't compare to the Costa Rican jungle, shit you do your exploring right, you might find a cure for some type of disease (or


catch one)...tons more to do, to find, to explore in the Jungle.



Fresh air is everywhere, and the rain forest is where the fresh air comes from



oh, and the Nazis sure did use that Swiss "neutrality" thing...put all that Jewish money, paintings, gold in Swiss bank accounts---the Swiss:"We bend over for anybody" 
First one looks to have some neighbors......no cabin fever there. :)
(http://www.archdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/621260827_scan-05.jpg)
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Lundgren on September 12, 2010, 10:11:12 AM
You guys are making it sounds like the swiss alps are in the north of russia. There loads of shit to do. And in driving distance of many major cities, milan, venice,  vienna, and geneva. Costa rica, got very little, to offer beside outdoor stuff. No descent cities, and mostly poor people, sure it'd be great to party there for a few months but it's not a descent life style.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: Hulkotron on September 12, 2010, 10:15:39 AM
#2 for me!
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: FREAKgeek on September 12, 2010, 10:17:25 AM
Switzerland
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: che on September 12, 2010, 10:18:53 AM
Costa Rica
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: FREAKgeek on September 12, 2010, 11:07:18 AM
Costa Rica

Switzerland.
Title: Re: Which one would you take??
Post by: phreak on September 12, 2010, 11:09:54 AM
only jungle bunnies would choose Costa Rica.


+1 for Switzerland