Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: mesmorph78 on September 26, 2010, 05:51:02 AM

Title: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: mesmorph78 on September 26, 2010, 05:51:02 AM
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007


Title: Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: Tito24 on September 26, 2010, 05:54:40 AM
thats why this whole "sport" is a joke.
Title: Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 26, 2010, 05:57:15 AM
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007






as i said to another guy, lucky for us........competent judges who understand the criteria by which bodybuilding contests are judged were responsible for the results tonight



and not you, who didnt want jay to win cause the other guy looked "prettier" :-\
Title: Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: G_Thang on September 26, 2010, 06:02:33 AM
branch didnt get marked down for a torn lat vs a complete dex.  politics and someone hates dex.

i have no problem jay winning #4 vs a better phil but he needs to call it a day.  odds are kai doesnt f##k up with weight next yr, phil can put on another 5-7lbs and i'm sure vic has an idea he needs to bring his physique up to 2010 standards.

jay is a hard worker but he isnt a bber who should be a 6-time O like yates.  sorry.  
Title: Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 26, 2010, 06:07:01 AM
branch didnt get marked down for a torn lat vs a complete dex.  politics and someone hates dex.

i have no problem jay winning #4 vs a better phil but he needs to call it a day.  odds are kai doesnt f##k up with weight next yr, phil can put on another 5-7lbs and i'm sure vic has an idea he needs to bring his physique up to 2010 standards.

jay is a hard worker but he isnt a bber who should be a 6-time O like yates.  sorry.  


what does that even mean, they gave jay one freebie in 07


but probably 3 of yates 6 were freebies ..........and im a fan of dorian


Title: Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: mesmorph78 on September 26, 2010, 06:42:32 AM


as i said to another guy, lucky for us........competent judges who understand the criteria by which bodybuilding contests are judged were responsible for the results tonight



and not you, who didnt want jay to win cause the other guy looked "prettier" :-\

don't get it twisted I like jay I just think he looked better last year...
Bodybuilding is about size conditioning AND SHAPE  phil and dex had all 3 relativley speaking
if the jay of last yr showed up then yes he should have won... This yrs jay
no way
Title: Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 26, 2010, 06:44:32 AM
don't get it twisted I like jay I just think he looked better last year...
Bodybuilding is about size conditioning AND SHAPE  phil and dex had all 3 relativley speaking
if the jay of last yr showed up then yes he should have won... This yrs jay
no way


he was not 100% of what he was last year


but he wasnt that far off either


that compared with his sure size, thickness, width, and completeness pushed him over the edge



Title: Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: _bruce_ on September 26, 2010, 06:48:52 AM
1. Rockel
2. Branch
3. Threeman
4. Rusty Jefferson(with Dave Henry on his shoulders)
5., 6., and so on... who cares.

Over 100 years class winner: MuscleCenter

Title: Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: mesmorph78 on September 26, 2010, 09:16:59 AM
I think he was a lot off from last yeah his upperbody looked flat...  Arms shrunk waiste wider back not as conditioned.
Like I said jay last year overwhelmed everyone   Not this year 
Phil now sports a better chest than jau more rounded delts
vastly superior arms and I do mean vastly.... And better balance and shape
simple
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: Tito24 on September 26, 2010, 10:14:56 AM
rusty didnt compete
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: MB on September 26, 2010, 11:53:24 AM
Jay was way off from last year.  He was fidgety and nervous on stage and lacked the confidence he had last year.  This was probably the result of his dehydration problem on Friday.  Also, he was struggling with his right quad.  The imbalance is more noticeable than ever now.   
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: Wiggs on September 26, 2010, 12:13:32 PM
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007





1.  Dexter = extremely flat and smaller than usual but shredded as fuck.  First place.....Hell no.
2.  Please provide pics of big waist.....Phil = Mr. Olympia....He was pretty much perfect...He no longer looks narrow....He's the real deal.
3.  Cutler was off by about 5%...Phil looks better then him from every angle except rear lat spread.
4.  Agreed about Branch....He's got everyone by the balls with this blue collar Texas Rattlesnake bullshit....Hard as fuck though Never a top 2 in a big show when the elites i.e. Jay, Phil, Kai compete.
5.  Wolf is better but he'll never be Mr. O
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: mesmorph78 on September 26, 2010, 12:49:53 PM

1.  Dexter = extremely flat and smaller than usual but shredded as fuck.  First place.....Hell no.
2.  Please provide pics of big waist.....Phil = Mr. Olympia....He was pretty much perfect...He no longer looks narrow....He's the real deal.
3.  Cutler was off by about 5%...Phil looks better then him from every angle except rear lat spread.
4.  Agreed about Branch....He's got everyone by the balls with this blue collar Texas Rattlesnake bullshit....Hard as fuck though Never a top 2 in a big show when the elites i.e. Jay, Phil, Kai compete.
5.  Wolf is better but he'll never be Mr. O

I said phil waiste is BIGGER than what is was... Which is understandable as he has put on size

I think jay was a lot more off than 5% check his arms ... Looks quite a bit smaller than last yr
his waiste is wider

Dex was the most complete athlete on stage IMO crisp great muscle shape no missing bodyparts
waiste and abs amazing...

I had it between him a d Heath for the o
very dissapointing they just gave it to jay..... Just because he is big and conditioned and wider than Heath and dex if that's the case kovacs and mr I should be multiple mr o winners
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: flexfan on September 26, 2010, 02:03:55 PM
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007




I agree with you. However, I'd go a step further- Dex, Heath, and Wolf all should have been ahead of Cutler. Oh well, par for the course at the O- usually very predictable because rep is usually more important than anything
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: shootfighter1 on September 26, 2010, 02:19:42 PM
I think Jay looked better on Saturday and he looked similar to last year, that being said, I prefer Phil's physique.
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: mesmorph78 on September 26, 2010, 03:12:27 PM
I think the judging needs to change how on earth can branch ever place in front of dexter...
That never should be
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: Fatpanda on September 26, 2010, 03:13:40 PM
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007




i'd have rockel at 4 and branch at 5, but other than that i agree.
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: mesmorph78 on September 26, 2010, 04:45:39 PM
Forgot about him yeah he looked good better than branch
but he will never get his dues
bb judging sucks
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: Man of Steel on September 26, 2010, 04:56:15 PM
The only placing that matters is first everything else sucks.
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: ThaRealist on September 26, 2010, 05:04:55 PM
Come on....The only placings that could have been swapped was Cutler and Phil and definitely Branch and Dexter...Dexter deserved 3rd solid, Jay and Phil could have been swapped places and I wouldn't have argued
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on September 26, 2010, 05:05:32 PM
This is how demented fan boys work:

-X, Y and Z should have been top 3.
-What about A, B and C?
-Oh yeah they too definately deserved to place in the top 3.
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: Doug_Steele on September 26, 2010, 05:08:33 PM
This is how demented fan boys work:

-X, Y and Z should have been top 3.
-What about A, B and C?
-Oh yeah they too definately deserved to place in the top 3.

Where is Dorian at?  :D
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: kiwiol on September 26, 2010, 05:13:50 PM
The contest was between Jay and Phil, and they both had very different types of physiques, each with their own flaws. Jay was the defending champ and wasn't off enough for Phil to knock him down. Nor did Phil outmuscle Jay. Also, Jay improved from Fri - Sat, while Phil went the other way, although not by that much.

Dex has been sharper and fuller, and is not really complete. He has poor calves and looked smaller than he's ever been, which is what cost him 3rd place over Branch, who had too much muscle and conditioning.

No way did Dex deserve the title this year, sorry mes.
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on September 26, 2010, 05:40:39 PM
Where is Dorian at?  :D

Disqualified because of the barrel waist.  ;D
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: Doug_Steele on September 26, 2010, 05:44:01 PM
Disqualified because of the barrel waist.  ;D

So, Ronnie won?  :D
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: disco_stu on September 26, 2010, 05:45:24 PM
I said phil waiste is BIGGER than what is was... Which is understandable as he has put on size

I think jay was a lot more off than 5% check his arms ... Looks quite a bit smaller than last yr
his waiste is wider

Dex was the most complete athlete on stage IMO crisp great muscle shape no missing bodyparts
waiste and abs amazing...

I had it between him a d Heath for the o
very dissapointing they just gave it to jay..... Just because he is big and conditioned and wider than Heath and dex if that's the case kovacs and mr I should be multiple mr o winners

x2.
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: erics on September 26, 2010, 05:55:49 PM
If the scorecards actually showed why each competitor placed where they did, it would clear up any and all confusion. You may still not agree with why the judges placed each guy where they did but at least you could see on what basis they did so.

There simply isn't a shred of accountability or transparency in bodybuilding judging. Absolutely none and until they clean that up, the whole thing is just speculation.
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: mesmorph78 on September 26, 2010, 06:12:27 PM
I dunno kiwol .. Dexter looked pretty complete to me you could argue his calves
buut then u could lower back for jay wrinkley smallish arms wiiiide waiste
that a lot more flaws than sex has.. Jay abs and thigh looks bad with that wide waiste
most muscular looks bad with his smaller arms
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: The Showstoppa on September 26, 2010, 06:15:02 PM
As soon as Cutler wasn't first in the original post, I stopped reading.
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: mesmorph78 on September 26, 2010, 06:19:14 PM
Just Reading md oct issue they had the pre Olympia feature
jay looked 1000 better last yr
this yr he def got a gift
Title: Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on September 26, 2010, 06:42:13 PM
So, Ronnie won?  :D

I guess so.  :-[