Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Dos Equis on October 03, 2010, 04:34:56 PM
-
If it were up to me, this man would never give a speech on U.S. soil again.
Ahmadinejad Calls for US Leaders to Be 'Buried'
Sunday, 03 Oct 2010
TEHRAN, Iran – Iran's president Sunday called for U.S. leaders to be "buried" in response to what he says are American threats of military attack against Tehran's nuclear program.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is known for brash rhetoric in addressing the West, but in a speech Sunday he went a step further using a deeply offensive insult in response to U.S. statements that the military option against Iran is still on the table.
"May the undertaker bury you, your table and your body, which has soiled the world," he said using language in Iran reserved for hated enemies.
Several top U.S. officials including Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff have said in recent months that the military option remains on the table and there is a plan to attack Iran, although a military strike has been described as a bad idea.
The crowd of military men and clerics in the town of Hashtgerd just west of the capital chuckled at the president's insult and applauded.
The speech was broadcast by both state television and the official English-language Press TV, but the latter glossed over the insult in the simultaneous translation.
Ahmadinejad's remarks come in sharp contrast to ones he made to Al-Jazeera Arabic news channel in August in which he offered the U.S. Iran's friendship.
In Sunday's speech, Ahmadinejad also questioned once more who was behind the Sept. 11 attacks in the U.S. and said they gave Washington a pretext for seeking to dominate the region and plunder its oil wealth.
During his speech in front of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, he said a majority of people in the U.S. and around the world believe the American government staged the attacks, drawing a strong rebuke from President Barack Obama.
Ahmadinejad often resorts to provocative statements to lash out enemies. He has already compared the power of Iran's enemies to a "mosquito," saying Iran deals with the West over its nuclear activities from a position of power and he has likened the United States to a "farm animal trapped in a quagmire" in Afghanistan.
Iran also condemned the latest U.S. sanctions slapped on eight Iranian officials Wednesday, saying they show American interference in Tehran's domestic affairs.
Washington this week imposed travel and financial sanctions on the eight Iranians, accusing them of taking part in human rights abuses during the turmoil following Iran's June 2009 presidential election.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/AhmadinejadIranUSleaders/2010/10/03/id/372338
-
:-\
-
Come on Beach, you know as well as I do if we all held hands and squeezed each others butts, all would be well. Ahmadinejad just wants someone to listen to him, he just needs rational discussion. ::)
-
"May the undertaker bury you, your table and your body, which has soiled the world,"
This is just a cultural misunderstanding. That's actually a blessing. When the undertaker buries you and your table, it protects you from the evils of the world. Your anti-Iranian views preclude you from seeing the happy, peaceful, and kind words of assholeminijad.
-
Come on Beach, you know as well as I do if we all held hands and squeezed each others butts, all would be well. Ahmadinejad just wants someone to listen to him, he just needs rational discussion. ::)
Yeah. Maybe the president needs to apologize to him for . . . something.
-
That's actually a blessing.
Strong religious subtext. Thread now being moved . . . . :)
The fact we give this fool an audience is just a testament to what a great country we have.
-
The Iranians are just misunderstood and they're being vilified by the West. ::)
The good news? The UN will give him another podium to speak on at the next gathering!
-
If your neighbor hated you, if he wanted to kill you and your family, would you invite him over and have a dinner in his honor?
Sometimes (more than not) life is retarded...thank you my beautiful progressive friends.
-
Yeah. Maybe the president needs to apologize to him for . . . something.
lol...this midget dictator is another fucking useless tool. A stupid puppet dangling from the threads of an equally useless religious zealot.
-
Actually, Ahmadinejad is very politically weak at home right now. Lots of other members of his own government are speaking out against him.
For his last inauguration, no members of the Ayatollah's family attended, a pretty major political snub.
This lashing out makes a lot more sense in this context - rallying support by US bashing isn't a bad option for him. Gets the focus off of him and onto the Great Satan.
-
The Iranians are just misunderstood and they're being vilified by the West. ::)
The good news? The UN will give him another podium to speak on at the next gathering!
Most Iranians hate Ahmadinejad and would love to see him gone. He is definitely not a majority voice.
-
lol...this midget dictator is another fucking useless tool. A stupid puppet dangling from the threads of an equally useless religious zealot.
Yep.
-
Most Iranians hate Ahmadinejad and would love to see him gone. He is definitely not a majority voice.
As if the Supreme Ayatollah is any different. His problems at home in his own party are stemming from the fact that his ego has gotten out of control and he's started to think he's bigger than the clerics who are the true rulers of Iran.
But there's speculation that Ahmadinejad is lashing out because of the StuxNet virus that is rumored to have completely crippled, if not outright destroyed, Iran's nuclear program for the time being. I posted a thread about it.
-
Most Iranians hate Ahmadinejad and would love to see him gone. He is definitely not a majority voice.
So what. His nearest replacement, Mousavi, is hardly much better despite being a reformist.
-
As if the Supreme Ayatollah is any different. His problems at home in his own party are stemming from the fact that his ego has gotten out of control and he's started to think he's bigger than the clerics who are the true rulers of Iran.
But there's speculation that Ahmadinejad is lashing out because of the StuxNet virus that is rumored to have completely crippled, if not outright destroyed, Iran's nuclear program for the time being. I posted a thread about it.
This is true.
All I've read shows that Iran's nuclear program is most likely completely destroyed due to that virus.
I think it's hilarious.
I agree with Beach on this... I would never let him back on US soil again.
Senators can't fly, but this fucktard can? Fuck him.
-
All I've read shows that Iran's nuclear program is most likely completely destroyed due to that virus.
I think it's hilarious.
They wanted to hang with the big boys and they got their wish. Welcome to the show, Iran. Hahahahaha, it's fucking hilarious, to say the least.
Now all we need is some retard to tell us how militarily powerful they are while a simple virus completely cripples their nuclear ambitions. Paper tiger through and through.
-
They wanted to hang with the big boys and they got their wish. Welcome to the show, Iran. Hahahahaha, it's fucking hilarious, to say the least.
Now all we need is some retard to tell us how militarily powerful they are while a simple virus completely cripples their nuclear ambitions. Paper tiger through and through. ::)
I would not be shocked to find that somewhere deep in a file cabinet in the DOD there is a file that mentions a government program to create a virus just for this purpose.
Wouldn't surprise me one bit.
-
Being buried will save America from capitalism and the tea party movement, so it's a good thing.
-
I would not be shocked to find that somewhere deep in a file cabinet in the DOD there is a file that mentions a government program to create a virus just for this purpose.
Wouldn't surprise me one bit.
Oh, no doubt. They've said that it was most likely a nation that created it and there are only a handful of countries capable of doing it, us being one of them. The capabilities of that worm are actually quite amazing. Whoever designed it has some serious computer knowhow.
-
I would not be shocked to find that somewhere deep in a file cabinet in the DOD there is a file that mentions a government program to create a virus just for this purpose.
Wouldn't surprise me one bit.
I'd be very surprised because it's more of an NSA function. But props to whoever pulled it off, haha.
-
Oh, no doubt. They've said that it was most likely a nation that created it and there are only a handful of countries capable of doing it, us being one of them. The capabilities of that worm are actually quite amazing. Whoever designed it has some serious computer knowhow.
Not only know how, but an understanding of how weak the Iranian computer security is.
I find it hilarious all around.
I'd be very surprised because it's more of an NSA function. But props to whoever pulled it off, haha.
The NSA is under the DOD.
-
The NSA is under the DOD.
This is true, I was thinking you were referring more militarily. My apologies!
-
This is true, I was thinking you were referring more militarily. My apologies!
No problem... I actually did some work for the DOD back in the day, that's the only reason why I know.
-
the weather looks clear for the next few days........3000 out.....123 up without FFP so power can be maintained...side drift shouldn't be a problem at all...
bench
-
If it were up to me, this man would never give a speech on U.S. soil again.
Ahmadinejad Calls for US Leaders to Be 'Buried'
Sunday, 03 Oct 2010
TEHRAN, Iran – Iran's president Sunday called for U.S. leaders to be "buried" in response to what he says are American threats of military attack against Tehran's nuclear program.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is known for brash rhetoric in addressing the West, but in a speech Sunday he went a step further using a deeply offensive insult in response to U.S. statements that the military option against Iran is still on the table.
"May the undertaker bury you, your table and your body, which has soiled the world," he said using language in Iran reserved for hated enemies.
Several top U.S. officials including Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff have said in recent months that the military option remains on the table and there is a plan to attack Iran, although a military strike has been described as a bad idea.
The crowd of military men and clerics in the town of Hashtgerd just west of the capital chuckled at the president's insult and applauded.
The speech was broadcast by both state television and the official English-language Press TV, but the latter glossed over the insult in the simultaneous translation.
Ahmadinejad's remarks come in sharp contrast to ones he made to Al-Jazeera Arabic news channel in August in which he offered the U.S. Iran's friendship.
In Sunday's speech, Ahmadinejad also questioned once more who was behind the Sept. 11 attacks in the U.S. and said they gave Washington a pretext for seeking to dominate the region and plunder its oil wealth.
During his speech in front of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, he said a majority of people in the U.S. and around the world believe the American government staged the attacks, drawing a strong rebuke from President Barack Obama.
Ahmadinejad often resorts to provocative statements to lash out enemies. He has already compared the power of Iran's enemies to a "mosquito," saying Iran deals with the West over its nuclear activities from a position of power and he has likened the United States to a "farm animal trapped in a quagmire" in Afghanistan.
Iran also condemned the latest U.S. sanctions slapped on eight Iranian officials Wednesday, saying they show American interference in Tehran's domestic affairs.
Washington this week imposed travel and financial sanctions on the eight Iranians, accusing them of taking part in human rights abuses during the turmoil following Iran's June 2009 presidential election.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/AhmadinejadIranUSleaders/2010/10/03/id/372338
That's why it is not up to you...
-
Come on Beach, you know as well as I do if we all held hands and squeezed each others butts, all would be well. Ahmadinejad just wants someone to listen to him, he just needs rational discussion. ::)
He needs a rational bullet thats it
-
They wanted to hang with the big boys and they got their wish. Welcome to the show, Iran. Hahahahaha, it's fucking hilarious, to say the least.
Now all we need is some retard to tell us how militarily powerful they are while a simple virus completely cripples their nuclear ambitions. Paper tiger through and through.
The Virus is actually very advanced so much there is talk about it being manufactured by the US military. Good stuff and much cheaper than going to war :)
-
Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran . . . . Where is John McCain when you need him?
Iran Admits It Could Pull Nuke Trigger on US, Israel
Tuesday, 05 Oct 2010
By: Ken Timmerman
For the first time since the expansion of Iran’s nuclear program was exposed in 2002, the Iranian government is dropping the pretense that it is developing nuclear technology purely for peaceful purposes. Iran has developed nuclear war plans to deter U.S. and Israeli aggression and retaliate against it, a top adviser to Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi announced in a strategic analysis.
Defense Ministry analyst Alireza Saeidabadi’s detailed analysis, published last week on a website that Iran’s intelligence ministry runs, examines several scenarios in which Iran could become embroiled in a shooting war with the United States or Israel.
One of the scenarios Iranian military planners must consider is a strategic nuclear U.S. strike on Iran, he writes. If that occurred, Iranian planning documents call for attacks against U.S. interests “on the world stage,” his analysis says.
The Iranian military should “prioritize its air force and ballistic missile fleet” in dealing with a conventional attack from Israel, Saeidabadi writes.
But in the event Israel uses unconventional weapons against Iran, “then Iran should employ a nuclear strategy.”
Similarly, if Iran and the United States get engaged in naval clashes in the Persian Gulf, Iran should “use its sea power for hit-and-run attacks, commando attacks, and use anti-shipping missiles” against U.S. naval vessels.
“But if the United States launches an unconventional attack, Iran needs to respond with a nuclear strategy,” the Iranian defense ministry analyst contends.
The meaning is clear to former Revolutionary Guards officer Reza Kahlili, the meaning is clear. “He means that Iran should be prepared with the capability of nuclear weapons to respond” if an enemy were to launch a nuclear strike against Iran, says Kahlili, author of a recent memoir, “A Time to Betray.”
“The use of nuclear technology for peaceful means is just a front,” Kahlili told Newsmax. “They are prepared to go to war and will not give up the bomb project, which they feel is very close to being able to arm their ballistic missiles with nuclear war heads.”
This is the first time that a senior Iranian government official has made an authorized public statement acknowledging that Iran has developed the military doctrine needed to employ nuclear weapons on the battlefield.
Although both President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei insist that Iran has the right to enrich uranium and to develop nuclear technology, both have stated consistently that Iran has no interest in nuclear weapons, and that Islam even forbids the use of such weapons.
Defense ministry officials’ talking openly about a nuclear war fighting doctrine turns on its head the long-stated public position of the Islamic Republic that Iran “couldn’t possibly want a nuclear weapon because their ideology and the religious rulings of Ayatollah Khomeini prohibited it,” says Kenneth Katzman, a former CIA analyst who is the top Iran expert at the Congressional Research Service.
Many U.S. experts have been skeptical of such Iranian disclaimers for years. But these latest Iranian statements give added weight to the view that Iranian officials say one thing in public, while doing exactly the opposite behind closed doors.
Former Assistant Secretary of State Paula DeSutter, who tracked nuclear weapons proliferation and verified arms control treaties with the Russian Federation and others for the Bush administration, believes that these latest Iranian statements “can only mean that Iran would target Israeli or U.S. nuclear facilities, or that it would employ nuclear weapons.”
“This language appears to take Iran from nuclear weapons acquisition planning into nuclear weapons employment doctrine, and is therefore quite serious,” DeSutter told Newsmax.
The article, which appeared at intelligence ministry website alef.ir, carried a blaring headline with a quote from the deputy chairman of Iran’s Joint Chiefs of Staff.
“Iran could get involved in a military conflict in the future,” the vice chief said.
While the deputy chief of the joint staff was not named in the article, a brief item on Iran’s state-run television network in July noted that Ayatollah Khamenei has just named Rear Admiral Saleh as deputy chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff with specific responsibilities for planning and budgetary affairs.
The brief television announcement gave no further information about the new vice chief and in the article last week his quote ran with his title and a picture with a blank face.
The article also states that Iran should be prepared to launch attacks against the continental United States, against economic targets, with the aim of “weakening the morale of the people,” language similar to that used by Osama bin Laden to justify the 9/11 attacks.
The Defense Ministry analysis is not a fiery propaganda document, but rather a measured examination of the real-world environment, and this is why it should be taken so seriously.
Regarding Israel, for example, the author refrains from polemics.
The Islamic Republic authorities “need to examine more closely what war with Israel would mean,” he states. “To do so, we first need to analyze Israel’s military capabilities. Israel has an estimated 200 nuclear warheads, as well as chemical and biological weapons. So if there is a conflict, one must first determine whether it will be a conventional war, or a nuclear war.”
Israel believes that Iran “threatens its existence,” and is therefore worried about Iran’s steadily improving relationships with its neighbors, especially Saudi Arabia and Lebanon, the Iranian Defense Ministry analyst writes.
To counter Iran’s regional influence, “Israel is expanding relations with Russia, Georgia, and some Central Asia states,” he writes. “Iran must keep Israel’s intentions in mind and therefore should pursue friendly cooperation with its neighbors, especially its Arab neighbors, to reduce Israel’s influence in the region.”
The analyst also argues that the United States is over-extended militarily because of its commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan. “The only way the United States could attack Iran would be after a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq,” he states.
“Thus, the more the United States withdraws its forces from Iraq, the greater the chance of a military conflict with Iran.”
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/iran-nuclear-weapons-israel/2010/10/05/id/372644
-
LOL. Can't control their populace, can't protect their nuke facilities. The Iranian military = joke.
-
What's with Ahmadinejad smiling all the time? Am I the only one who notices? Is it just me?
He's always got this obnoxious smirk on his face. Irrelevant of his politics it's annoying.