Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: ManBearPig... on October 11, 2010, 11:46:38 AM

Title: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: ManBearPig... on October 11, 2010, 11:46:38 AM
as he claims?
(http://i45.tinypic.com/2n1hxxw.jpg)

http://bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/teezlr/
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: The Showstoppa on October 11, 2010, 11:47:49 AM
i think he's a lying sack of shit, but we probably need Crotch to verify it.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: ironneck on October 11, 2010, 11:50:34 AM
fatpanda is on roids, then this guy is also
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: StanZoLOL on October 11, 2010, 11:53:23 AM
No.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Captain Equipoise on October 11, 2010, 11:53:48 AM
Those striations look a little suspect.. although I've met a few guys with insane genetics that looked more or less like that without gear.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Fallsview on October 11, 2010, 11:55:33 AM
cruising the bathhouses.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: jaejonna on October 11, 2010, 11:58:52 AM
Dirk from the Dallas Mavs ?
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: BB on October 11, 2010, 12:02:02 PM
Nope, no one is 5'10 and averaging 200lbs at that bodyfat naturally. Also claims a near 2x bodyweight bench at that weight/leaness? Nope, not natural.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: kiwiol on October 11, 2010, 12:06:05 PM
In before unprovoked meltdown from gh15
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Ursus on October 11, 2010, 12:20:16 PM
Possible
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Army of One on October 11, 2010, 12:21:41 PM
In b4 all the secret forum juicers say "yes or "possible".
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: saucetradomous on October 11, 2010, 12:21:53 PM
Possible

X2
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: saucetradomous on October 11, 2010, 12:23:02 PM
In b4 all the secret forum juicers say "yes or "possible".

you missed it by one post
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: tbombz on October 11, 2010, 12:25:30 PM
need to see him in a t shirt..   he looks awesome right there, but he is super lean, and i dont think he is going to carry much size if you see him in real life and in clothes. its very likely that he is juicing, and has been for a longtime, as i personally know over 10 long term juicers who dont look as good and arent that much bigger. but if this guy has good genes for detail and conditioning and lifts hard its possible he is a natural as long as that size isnt anything more than illusion.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: saucetradomous on October 11, 2010, 12:27:36 PM
Nope, no one is 5'10 and averaging 200lbs at that bodyfat naturally. Also claims a near 2x bodyweight bench at that weight/leaness? Nope, not natural.

I highly doubt he's 200lbs in that picture.. more like 175lbs
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Ursus on October 11, 2010, 12:32:36 PM
Exactly - he is NOT big. Layne Norton looks 40lb heavier than him and was what 210lbs?

he has great shoulders and arms and is lean. Tony waist also helps.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Wiggs on October 11, 2010, 12:34:45 PM
Don't know but he looks awesome.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: delta9mda on October 11, 2010, 12:37:06 PM
thats not adonis
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Jaime on October 11, 2010, 12:42:16 PM
Possible.

Oh and Jenson Button looking jacked.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Ursus on October 11, 2010, 12:42:22 PM
Natties can easily get ultra lean. Just cant carry any discernable size/weight whatsoever.

This guys trains in my gym, applied for MH cover model comp. In decent shape but i don't think he is above 140lbs in this pic and maybe 5'9 or 5'10
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: ManBearPig... on October 11, 2010, 12:43:41 PM
I highly doubt he's 200lbs in that picture.. more like 175lbs

he claims he's 5'11" 195 in that pic, with good lighting, favorable angle, and taken immediately after a workout.

*in before Adonis asks me why i have an obsession with a half naked white dude*
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Jaime on October 11, 2010, 12:50:00 PM
Doesn't look 195, not unless he has some legs. Which is one thing that is hard to achieve natty.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: MAXX on October 11, 2010, 01:03:22 PM
don't think so. sick chest.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Nails on October 11, 2010, 01:04:48 PM
FAG IN THE SHOWERS!!!

FAG IN THE SHOWERS!!!

FAG IN THE SHOWERS!!!

FAG IN THE SHOWERS!!!
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Dorian01 on October 11, 2010, 01:05:36 PM
Him a year ago

(http://bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/img/user_images/growable/2009/12/06/191833/progresspic/1kZDyXeskEf9bqcZIbHk0MOzlsHonI1866.jpeg)
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Nails on October 11, 2010, 01:09:19 PM
Him a year ago

(http://bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/img/user_images/growable/2009/12/06/191833/progresspic/1kZDyXeskEf9bqcZIbHk0MOzlsHonI1866.jpeg)

A YEAR AGO? not natural
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: tommywishbone on October 11, 2010, 01:16:59 PM
Lovely accommodations.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: dyslexic on October 11, 2010, 01:31:25 PM
It's tough to say.


I've also seen guys with tiny joints (not for smoking)-- and long round muscle bellies. They would look exceptional regardless of "assistance"

I just think we all make that assumption since Juicy-juice is becoming more and more prevalent in everyday life.


He looks good. Homo. If he isn't juiced, can you imagine if'n he was? He would still look better as a natty than most of us, right?
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Deicide on October 11, 2010, 01:32:20 PM
Those striations look a little suspect.. although I've met a few guys with insane genetics that looked more or less like that without gear.


Genetics=everything.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Jaime on October 11, 2010, 01:33:36 PM
He looks like complete shit a year ago, not natty.

Physique in the first pic is attainable but not by him evidently.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Tom on October 11, 2010, 01:33:57 PM
i doubt it he's natural? reminds me of this guy at my gym, he's 47 years old! and has a similar build, perhaps even thicker but has the same upper body vascularity and has that paper skin look. told me he's been lifting for like 30 years and his diet is only so so, but he does down the protein drinks. me thinks, he's full of shit! for a dude to be 47 years old and year round be below 10 percent body fat, with thickness and vascularity and that paper thin skin look he has to be taking something, especiall since like he said his diet is not spot on every day! this guy is not super huge, maybe a buck 80, but aren't there certain aas that don't bloat and perhaps dont built mass, but do give you that muscularity, vascularity and paper skin look?
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Jaime on October 11, 2010, 01:40:28 PM
If you don't think you can hit 180 lean as a natty i pity you.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Ursus on October 11, 2010, 01:56:56 PM
Are you serious when people don't think you can diet in 1 year?

Also he looks pretty big in the before pic, tubby but big. By the size of his legs he has certainly trained a while anyway.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Croatch on October 11, 2010, 02:44:22 PM
i think he's a lying sack of shit, but we probably need Crotch to verify it.
Aside from him being able to gain money on the training end, selling the natural thing.
I don't see why you'd lie here?  To impress a bunch of internet fools.
Entirely possible.  180lbs isn't very large on a what 5' 10" frame?
Good genetics doesn't equal steroids.

I had some idiot say to me the other day, "Bro, easy up on the steroids...you're veins are out of control."
As we all know, steroids=veins?
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Croatch on October 11, 2010, 02:50:36 PM
Did you kill him?
It's my buddy.  Of course, who doesn't lift, drinks beer...weighs about 170lbs @5' 10", and wonders how I could possibly have more muscle than him? ::)
The Croatch eats chicken/eggs trains 5 days a week for the past 15 years, you drink beer, barely exercise...must be steroids.
This is the exact kind of bs I'm speaking of.
Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Nails on October 11, 2010, 02:54:19 PM
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs121.snc3/16858_686110038205_38413577_38542241_2764899_n.jpg)

(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs185.snc3/19258_680624391485_38413577_38377701_686840_n.jpg)

(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs185.snc3/19258_680624581105_38413577_38377709_3603523_n.jpg)

(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs068.snc3/13558_661890823705_38413577_37761820_6057722_n.jpg)




Title: Re: is this stud a lifetime natural?
Post by: Croatch on October 11, 2010, 02:55:07 PM
(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs121.snc3/16858_686110038205_38413577_38542241_2764899_n.jpg)



Probably some idiot female taking this shot.  Hold the camera still bitch. 8)