Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on November 02, 2010, 12:01:45 PM
-
How about you?
-
Congrats, you'll be smokin the weeds legally in no time
-
I voted for paladino, dioguardi, townsend, harry wilson, etc. in NYS.
No hesitation whatsoever. Time to end the madness at 1600 PA Ave.
-
19 might not pass dov. Hope it doesn't!
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=354102.0;attach=389579;image)
-
19 might not pass dov. Hope it doesn't!
Hehe. Yeah. That War on Drugs. You know who still thinks that's winnable? ;D
-
i'll be voting right after work
-
So if you can't beat em, join em Chimps? Yeah, that always works well!
-
So if you can't beat em, join em Chimps? Yeah, that always works well!
No. The argument against it is as spurious as those that informed Prohibition. But, if you had a grasp of US political history you'd know that, rather than parroting some alarmist. :-\
-
About to leave in a few minutes. Had to finish researching the candidates to make sure they are not religious at all. VERY hard to do.
-
Who sported the smallest, most soiled thong and which candidate had best lat-spread?
-
The far left is going down today - and different than they are used to.
-
How about you?
-
About to leave in a few minutes. Had to finish researching the candidates to make sure they are not religious at all. VERY hard to do.
Haha! You're in the Bible belt....good luck finding any progressive candidates on Tobacco Road!
-
:D :D :D :D :D :D
-
Just vote for a lib TA, anyone fits that.
-
I think the Republicans won`t be that successful as they think. I mean they are turning even dumber than expected which I thought was nearly impossible to do after the Palin debacle.
Oh well, the country is getting dumber and dumber anyways so perhaps that explains the trending widespread appeal to be a moron and to vote like one.
-
Were you not one of the moron who voted for Obama..hahaha. How's that working for ya?
-
Just vote for a lib TA, anyone fits that.
Hard to find any true Progressives at all. Most are ConservaDems. Its absolutely horrible.
-
I think the Republicans won`t be that successful as they think. I mean they are turning even dumber than expected which I thought was nearly impossible to do after the Palin debacle.
Oh well, the country is getting dumber and dumber anyways so perhaps that explains the trending widespread appeal to be a moron and to vote like one.
Yeah - the pland and programs of the transformational messiah you shilled for have really panned out. ::) ::)
-
So you're an admitted communist?
-
19 might not pass dov. Hope it doesn't!
Why not?
-
::)
-
Were you not one of the moron who voted for Obama..hahaha. How's that working for ya?
He hasn`t been progressive enough and that is largely due to the crappy ConservaDems and Republicans as well as an uneducated public.
Right President, Wrong time and Circumstances. Hes too advanced for the current zeitgeist and is chained to his fate by the garbage surrounding him.
-
He hasn`t been progressive enough and that is largely due to the crappy ConservaDems and Republicans as well as an uneducated public.
Right President, Wrong time and Circumstances. Hes too advanced for the current zeitgeist and is chained to his fate by the garbage surrounding him.
Ha ha ha ha - the idiot has never even run a lemonade stand in his life. And if we should forget -
-
So you're an admitted communist?
You know what coach Me and you have a lot in common. We both just finished exercising our rights, the only difference is when I just blew my load I had a little something to show for it, other than a bunch of anxeity and gay hype for old men.
-
So you're an admitted communist?
I am a Libertarian Socialist/Democratic Socialist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism
-
Hard to find any true Progressives at all. Most are ConservaDems. Its absolutely horrible.
There you go again speaking on shit you have no idea about. I would go back to romper room piss ant.
-
smoking weed is a personal choice that no government has the right to take away.
republicans are fucking stupid because they
A)think that capitalism works unregulated and believe in trickle down economics, and
B) dont understand that the government has no place trying to enforce "morals" on people
-
There you go again speaking on shit you have no idea about. I would go back to romper room piss ant.
Sorry to disappoint you, but there just are hardly any True Progressive candidates. Most of the "Democrats" are ConservaDems, more or less Republicans.
Very, Very few true liberals really at all.
-
Sorry to disappoint you, but there just are hardly any True Progressive candidates. Most of the "Democrats" are ConservaDems, more or less Republicans.
Very, Very few true liberals really at all.
::) ::)
Go to Cuba, VZ, or NK if you want that.
-
There you go again speaking on shit you have no idea about. I would go back to romper room piss ant.
he is right about that, they arent any true liberals running for office. we might have 1 or 2 true liberals in our entire government.. house, senate, executive and judicial branch all combined.
ta- your so wrong about politicians being religious. religion is the only thing that can bring sanity to an intellectual man, and make sense of this reality we live in. modern day politicians dont reflect true religious sentiment.
-
smoking weed is a personal choice that no government has the right to take away.
republicans are fucking stupid because they
A)think that capitalism works unregulated and believe in trickle down economics, and
B) dont understand that the government has no place trying to enforce "morals" on people
haha, you think democrats don't enforce "morals" on people, too? Both sides do it, it just depends on whose "morals" you agree with.
-
I think the Republicans won`t be that successful as they think. I mean they are turning even dumber than expected which I thought was nearly impossible to do after the Palin debacle.
Oh well, the country is getting dumber and dumber anyways so perhaps that explains the trending widespread appeal to be a moron and to vote like one.
80 seats and controll of the senate.Odonnell wins as well as does Angle.Pretty easy to win when your opponent is anti-white anti American racist like Imam Barrack HAUSSEIN OBAMA.
-
He hasn`t been progressive enough and that is largely due to the crappy ConservaDems and Republicans as well as an uneducated public.
Right President, Wrong time and Circumstances. Hes too advanced for the current zeitgeist and is chained to his fate by the garbage surrounding him.
Yeah, the idea of spending millions to teach some 3rd worlders how to wash their balls is very "advanced." ::)
-
If you vote democrat this is what your voting for
1. Nancy Pelosi (evil devil woman)
2. Harry Reid (need I say more)
3.Senators who bash Americans and the troops who risk their lifes for us.
4.You love high taxes
5.You want to cut and run from Iraq
6 You don't want drilling in Alaska or anywhere else in the U.S. but you like to whine about how we shouldn't be dependant on the Middle East for our oil.
7.Democrats vote against every plan that has been implemented to prevent future terroist attacks.
8. You want to sock it to big oil and tax them to death so our gas prices can go up even further even though they already pay an astounding tax rate
9. You believe in abortion on demand and experimentation on human life. (you can kill thousands of babies but are to big of pussy to put murderes to death in prison would rather pay half a million dollars to keep them alive.
-
Tbombz already admitted he doesn't vote because "its a waste of time" so I really don't take him seriously.
-
haha, you think democrats don't enforce "morals" on people, too? Both sides do it, it just depends on whose "morals" you agree with.
the only "morals" democrats try to enforce is "economic morals", if you could even call it that. democrats, for the most part, understand that the government has no role in trying to play mommy and daddy.
the funny part about republicans trying to enforce morals is that almost all of those who do so are doing so out of a belief they hold that God would want them to govern in such a manner. Yet God himself created humans with no moral regulations, Gods government allows people to do whatever they please..whether its the most supreme evil or the slightest good. if a government was instituted which demanded its citizens to behave "morally", it would be destroying Gods system. God wants to let people act bad if they choose.. thats the whole point of existence: to test humans and see if they are worthy of his kingdom and whatever responsibiitties are granted there. a government should only prohibit those behaviors which will inhibit other people(s) from exercising all of their rights (which include freedom from theft, murder, ect)
-
Republicans - AGAINST THE KILLING OF BABIES, but don't want to pay to Raise it once its born
Democrats - FOR THE KILLING OF BABIES , but once they are born they want everyone else to pay for raising it
how does that even make sense :-\ Politics ::)
-
the only "morals" democrats try to enforce is "economic morals", if you could even call it that. democrats, for the most part, understand that the government has no role in trying to play mommy and daddy.
the funny part about republicans trying to enforce morals is that almost all of those who do so are doing so out of a belief they hold that God would want them to govern in such a manner. Yet God himself created humans with no moral regulations, Gods government allows people to do whatever they please..whether its the most supreme evil or the slightest good. if a government was instituted which demanded its citizens to behave "morally", it would be destroying Gods system. God wants to let people act bad if they choose.. thats the whole point of existence: to test humans and see if they are worthy of his kingdom and whatever responsibiitties are granted there. a government should only prohibit those behaviors which will inhibit other people(s) from exercising all of their rights (which include freedom from theft, murder, ect)
HA HA HA HA -
Hate speech codes
Food regulations
Zero Tolerance nonsense
Gun control BS
radical anti-religious nonsense
and on and on and.
-
4.You love high taxes taxes are necessary
6 You don't want drilling in Alaska or anywhere else in the U.S. but you like to whine about how we shouldn't be dependant on the Middle East for our oil.
burning fossil fuels will lead to the destruction of the conditions necessary for life on this planet. you want to drill for more oil so we can speed up the process of killing off the entire future of humanity?
9. You believe in abortion on demand and experimentation on human life. (you can kill thousands of babies but are to big of pussy to put murderes to death in prison would rather pay half a million dollars to keep them alive.
if you have even the slightest knowledge of the nuero development in human fetus', you would understand that its complete bullshit to assume "life" begins at any point prior to birth.
-
the only "morals" democrats try to enforce is "economic morals", if you could even call it that. democrats, for the most part, understand that the government has no role in trying to play mommy and daddy.
the funny part about republicans trying to enforce morals is that almost all of those who do so are doing so out of a belief they hold that God would want them to govern in such a manner. Yet God himself created humans with no moral regulations, Gods government allows people to do whatever they please..whether its the most supreme evil or the slightest good. if a government was instituted which demanded its citizens to behave "morally", it would be destroying Gods system. God wants to let people act bad if they choose.. thats the whole point of existence: to test humans and see if they are worthy of his kingdom and whatever responsibiitties are granted there. a government should only prohibit those behaviors which will inhibit other people(s) from exercising all of their rights (which include freedom from theft, murder, ect)
Oh dear, young man.....you are advanced in some areas for your age, but politics isn't one of them......just how many of these "not enforcing morals" democrats support legalizing your beloved marijuana? Probably a hand full of kooks in Cali that the rest of the party disowns. And I heard on ANY occasions that the reason we needed national health care from the dems was that it was a "moral obligation."
Both parties do it...and like I said it just depends on who's morals you agree with.
-
This is the reason why pubs have a 'no politics no religion' sign.
-
This is the reason why pubs have a 'no politics no religion' sign.
I'd rather fight over sports than two-sides of the same coin....
-
The last time I went to vote I got arrested. Those bastards.
-
I'd rather fight over sports than two-sides of the same coin....
Yup. Drinking Baseball season can't come soon enough for me. :)
/leafs vs. sens tonight, and i'm only there for the brewskis!
-
Yup. Drinking Baseball season can't come soon enough for me. :)
/leafs vs. sens tonight, and i'm only there for the brewskis!
Hurricanes are off to a decent start, too..... 8)
-
Yup. Drinking Baseball season can't come soon enough for me. :)
/leafs vs. sens tonight, and i'm only there for the brewskis!
Steve Yzerman. 8)
Best person to ever come out of Canada. :D
-
Steve Yzerman. 8)
Best person to ever come out of Canada. :D
But can even he make up for Celine Dion!? Nope. We'll be paying off her for years to come. ;D
-
I voted for paladino, dioguardi, townsend, harry wilson, etc. in NYS.
No hesitation whatsoever. Time to end the madness at 1600 PA Ave.
I did the same exact, conservative straight across the board.
-
(http://wallofpaul.com/files/Fuck%20Face%20%28shrunk%29.jpg)
-
Ha ha ha ha - the idiot has never even run a lemonade stand in his life. And if we should forget -
Those two videos that you posted demonstrate that Obama has sound judgement when it comes to Health Care issues. What were you trying to show us?
"1"
-
(http://wallofpaul.com/files/Fuck%20Face%20%28shrunk%29.jpg)
I have that card. :D
-
I have that card. :D
;D
-
Those two videos that you posted demonstrate that Obama has sound judgement when it comes to Health Care issues. What were you trying to show us?
"1"
Are you kidding?
even the board of surgeons came out and proved him to be lying his ass off on these idiotic lies.
-
That Billy Ripken card reminds me one time growing up, during a group basketball team picture there were four of us who did the crotch grab in it....parents weren't very happy.... :-\
-
Are you kidding?
even the board of surgeons came out and proved him to be lying his ass off on these idiotic lies.
What he said is true.
If a patient comes in for diabetic counseling and treatment, medical staff gets very little reimbursement back from the insurance companies and almost nothing, if anything at all, from medicaid.
What he said with regards to surgeons getting reimbursement back for immediate amputations is true. They can justify the surgery as a life or death means of therapy. Preventive therapy, while a smart way to tackle diabetes, is not what gets physicians money.
That's the truth.
"1"
P.S. Trust me, I'm not the biggest Obama fan, but his approach to Health Care reform is not ALL bad.
-
What he said is true.
If a patient comes in for diabetic counseling and treatment, medical staff gets very little reimbursement back from the insurance companies and almost nothing, if anything at all, from medicaid.
What he said with regards to surgeons getting reimbursement back for immediate amputations is true. They can justify the surgery as a life or death means of therapy. Preventive therapy, while a smart way to tackle diabetes, is not what gets physicians money.
That's the truth.
"1"
P.S. Trust me, I'm not the biggest Obama fan, but his approach to Health Care reform is not ALL bad.
::)
He said the doc gets 25k, it was later proven the doc gets $500. even the Board of Surgeons disproved his lies.
________________________ ________________________ ____________
The American College of Surgeons is deeply disturbed over the uninformed public comments President Obama continues to make about the high-quality care provided by surgeons in the United States. When the President makes statements that are incorrect or not based in fact, we think he does a disservice to the American people at a time when they want clear, understandable facts about health care reform. We want to set the record straight.
Yesterday during a town hall meeting, President Obama got his facts completely wrong. He stated that a surgeon gets paid $50,000 for a leg amputation when, in fact, Medicare pays a surgeon between $740 and $1,140 for a leg amputation. This payment also includes the evaluation of the patient on the day of the operation plus patient follow-up care that is provided for 90 days after the operation. Private insurers pay some variation of the Medicare reimbursement for this service.
Three weeks ago, the President suggested that a surgeon's decision to remove a child's tonsils is based on the desire to make a lot of money. That remark was ill-informed and dangerous, and we were dismayed by this characterization of the work surgeons do. Surgeons make decisions about recommending operations based on what's right for the patient.
We agree with the President that the best thing for patients with diabetes is to manage the disease proactively to avoid the bad consequences that can occur, including blindness, stroke, and amputation. But as is the case for a person who has been treated for cancer and still needs to have a tumor removed, or a person who is in a terrible car crash and needs access to a trauma surgeon, there are times when even a perfectly managed diabetic patient needs a surgeon. The President's remarks are truly alarming and run the risk of damaging the all-important trust between surgeons and their patients.
We assume that the President made these mistakes unintentionally, but we would urge him to have his facts correct before making another inflammatory and incorrect statement about surgeons and surgical care.
Sincerely,
L.D. Britt, M.D., FACS, Chair of the ACS Board of Regents
John Cameron, M.D., FACS, President of the American College of Surgeons
Andrew Warshaw, M.D., FACS, Chair of the ACS Health Policy and Advocacy Group
Christian Shalgian, ACS Director, Division of Advocacy and Health Policy
-
Just voted!
Too bad I had to leave many blank as a show of a "vote of No confidence".
-
Just voted!
Too bad I had to leave many blank as a show of a "vote of No confidence".
Did you write yourself in for Burr vs. Marshall? ;D
-
Did you write yourself in for Burr vs. Marshall? ;D
I did write myself in a few instances actually. Jezebelle voted for me as well! Lets hope I win.
-
I did write myself in a few instances actually. Jezebelle voted for me as well! Lets hope I win.
Does this mean you will be moving to Canada and become their leader? :-\ :-\ :-\
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=354108.0;attach=389598;image)
And thats why my kid will be named SEVEN ;D
-
(http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa59/charrogent/sexy-flag.jpg)
(http://i630.photobucket.com/albums/uu21/jkinman1024/Absolute/God%20Bless%20American%20Beauty/AmericanFlagBikini.jpg)
8) 8)
-
(http://27.media.tumblr.com/MJCR9MgLEb0id9g66mWBMmV4_500.jpg)
-
I am a Libertarian Socialist/Democratic Socialist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism
how can you be for something like this bro?
"Libertarian socialism tends to deny the legitimacy of most forms of economically significant private property, viewing capitalist property relations as forms of domination that are antagonistic to individual freedom.[18]"
why not be a capitalist and capitalize off of something small and make it better, i can give you a few examples if you like and yes capitalism can benefit everyone who participates in it
and this? However, the association of socialism with libertarianism predates that of capitalism, and many anti-authoritarians still decry what they see as a mistaken association of capitalism with libertarianism in the United States.[22] As Noam Chomsky put it, a consistent libertarian "must oppose private ownership of the means of production and the wage slavery, which is a component of this system, as incompatible with the principle that labor must be freely undertaken and under the control of the producer."[23]"
there must be capitalism without it there is no incentive and less incentive for those that are already hardworking and productive in contrast to the unproductive welfare type
-
Its coming bitches.
-
Congrats, you'll be smokin the weeds legally in no time
wrong. supremacy cause
-
poor people need to band together and form aliances and buy land and "capitalize" off of the land , many ways to do this.
the problem is even poor people dont band together , most are full of hate from being poor they dont realize that they could gain some wealth by buying some land and developing it and build houses out of used materials for practically nothing
one of the main problems is local dumps and landfills wasting thousands of dollars of raw materials a day that people pay to dump excess construction debree wich contain alot of reuseable materialls
-
Since pot legalization, slots, and prostitution werent on my ballots to be voted on, I wrote them in as candidates.
-
Kiss me: I voted. :-*
-
Kiss me: I voted. :-*
Did you vote for boxer?
If so - shame on you.
-
It's time like these that make me feel very patriotic.
(http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/1007/patriotism-flag-bikini-patriotism-demotivational-poster-1278285932.png)
-
Did you vote for boxer?
If so - shame on you.
Excuse, im sorry C UNT Senator
-
::)
He said the doc gets 25k, it was later proven the doc gets $500. even the Board of Surgeons disproved his lies.
________________________ ________________________ ____________
The American College of Surgeons is deeply disturbed over the uninformed public comments President Obama continues to make about the high-quality care provided by surgeons in the United States. When the President makes statements that are incorrect or not based in fact, we think he does a disservice to the American people at a time when they want clear, understandable facts about health care reform. We want to set the record straight.
Yesterday during a town hall meeting, President Obama got his facts completely wrong. He stated that a surgeon gets paid $50,000 for a leg amputation when, in fact, Medicare pays a surgeon between $740 and $1,140 for a leg amputation. This payment also includes the evaluation of the patient on the day of the operation plus patient follow-up care that is provided for 90 days after the operation. Private insurers pay some variation of the Medicare reimbursement for this service.
Three weeks ago, the President suggested that a surgeon's decision to remove a child's tonsils is based on the desire to make a lot of money. That remark was ill-informed and dangerous, and we were dismayed by this characterization of the work surgeons do. Surgeons make decisions about recommending operations based on what's right for the patient.
We agree with the President that the best thing for patients with diabetes is to manage the disease proactively to avoid the bad consequences that can occur, including blindness, stroke, and amputation. But as is the case for a person who has been treated for cancer and still needs to have a tumor removed, or a person who is in a terrible car crash and needs access to a trauma surgeon, there are times when even a perfectly managed diabetic patient needs a surgeon. The President's remarks are truly alarming and run the risk of damaging the all-important trust between surgeons and their patients.
We assume that the President made these mistakes unintentionally, but we would urge him to have his facts correct before making another inflammatory and incorrect statement about surgeons and surgical care.
Sincerely,
L.D. Britt, M.D., FACS, Chair of the ACS Board of Regents
John Cameron, M.D., FACS, President of the American College of Surgeons
Andrew Warshaw, M.D., FACS, Chair of the ACS Health Policy and Advocacy Group
Christian Shalgian, ACS Director, Division of Advocacy and Health Policy
You don't have to post that up.
Listen, it's very simple. A surgeon will bill for his initial consult (Something which isn't mentioned in the material you pasted) and that consult alone can range between $700-$1,200 easily. Then, on the day of the surgery, as that article you posted clearly states, the surgeon will get reimbursed for another $740 - $1,140. That DOES NOT MEAN that the surgery in its entirety COSTS only $1,140.
There are overhead costs that need to be accounted for that do not include the surgeon's pay. That is where OBAMA gets that 30K figure he threw around.
The insurance has to pay the hospital for the price of the Pre-procedural assessments that the Nurses and the PACU medical team does prior to the patient going into the OR. That alone encompasses pay for secretaries that register the patient, pre-procedural nurses that do initial assessments and take histories, doctors that then take a full HPI/Physical and then the Anesthesiologist's assessment/time.
The insurance then has to cover the cost of the OR room expenses. That includes (Aside from the surgeon), the OR nurses that are in the room, the OR techs, the fee for the equipment that the hospital charges and the fee for the Anesthesiologist's time and for, most importantly, the MEDS he is pumping into the patient.
Afterwards, there is the price of the PACU (Post anesthesia care unit). Here you have post-procedural nurses and a medical staff that sees to the full recovery of the patient, along with pain management. Add to this the fact that every single item that patient consumes, from an 8 ounce apple juice container to even a snackwells cookies pack is charged up towards his insurance/bill and THATS HOW YOU GET THAT 30K figure.
So, you see while the surgeon's role is a very crucial one, it is but a small part in the entire process. A part that still gets very well reimbursed, considering how much more money has to be dispersed amongst a large group of individuals and, NOT TO MENTION, a much larger hospital (That is running a business above all).
"1"
P.S. Feel free to play this scenario out to your own private doctor and/or friends and you will see that this is why that amputation costs 30K. It's the full cost of reimbursement.
Now, compare that to an actual visit where a patient goes in to seek primary prevention methods in order to keep their diabetes at bay as to not have to face the grim notion of an amputation and that's where you truly see pennies. In that scenario, you have an outpatient visit, where the insurance does not need to cover the cost of the secretarial staff, nurses or even hospital overhead. The insurance only then has to reimburse the doctor/hospital for the visit, which is a minimal fee (The breakdown between how much the doctor gets versus the hospital per patient visit depends on the state and institution).
-
As long as politicians stay out of my life, I couldn't care less who gets elected. The government doesen't do and cannot do anything for people of average skills and intelligence and up to make their lives better. All they do is take money from the productive people and give it to the entitled of Society. As long as you have average skills and intelligence, you can by yourself make life much better for yourself than the government ever could. Government: feeding and sheltering the incompetent and shiftless at the expense of the industrious and capable since 7,000 B.C.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
As long as politicians stay out of my life, I couldn't care less who gets elected. The government doesen't do and cannot do anything for people of average skills and intelligence and up to make their lives better. All they do is take money from the productive people and give it to the entitled of Society. As long as you have average skills and intelligence, you can by yourself make life much better for yourself than the government ever could. Government: feeding and sheltering the incompetent and shiftless at the expense of the industrious and capable since 7,000 B.C.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
Yeah, and who needs roads and police and firefighters and military and a judicial system! All they do is suck the money out of my pocket and give it to the entitled! ::)
Give me a break...why do so many who are against taxation take the "all or nothing" approach? There is a need for a society to have taxation to provide services and accomplish task that individuals and private companies can't. What do you want to do, privitize the military? (Ask Hannibal Barca how that worked out.) How are we going to pay to keep up the infrastructure that is necessary for commerce to function efficiently?
I don't disagree that there has to be a limit and that much of the tax that is taken from us isn't used as efficiently as it should be. However, a society with no taxation doesn't work.
-
Yeah, and who needs roads and police and firefighters and military and a judicial system! All they do is suck the money out of my pocket and give it to the entitled!
Give me a break...why do so many who are against taxation take the "all or nothing" approach? There is a need for a society to have taxation to provide services and accomplish task that individuals and private companies can't. What do you want to do, privitize the military? (Ask Hannibal Barca how that worked out.) How are we going to pay to keep up the infrastructure that is necessary for commerce to function efficiently?
I don't disagree that there has to be a limit and that much of the tax that is taken from us isn't used as efficiently as it should be. However, a society with no taxation doesn't work.
You talk as if the government is doing us a big favor by building roads. They build roads with our money, idiot. The money we earn with our sweat and tears. They are just doing their obligation by building roads. And only 10% of the money collected by government goes to build roads and stuff like that. The majority goes to social welfare programs to feed the shiftless or to the police and prisons to incarcerate the shiftless who choose to prey on us because they are too lazy to work. And speaking of roads, privately owned ones are much better. I have used both government roads and privately owned ones and the privately owned ones are much better, with less holes, etc. The government is good in the sense that we are Humans and not animals and therefore we won't allow the idiots of Society to starve, but it is truly a pain in the ass in the lives of everyone that can take care of themselves.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
This is the average voter:
-
Funny how they didn't even ask for ID when I went to vote... Shit I could have sent my dog to vote for me and hit them gym instead
-
Oh dear, young man.....you are advanced in some areas for your age, but politics isn't one of them......just how many of these "not enforcing morals" democrats support legalizing your beloved marijuana? Probably a hand full of kooks in Cali that the rest of the party disowns. And I heard on ANY occasions that the reason we needed national health care from the dems was that it was a "moral obligation."
Both parties do it...and like I said it just depends on who's morals you agree with.
i never said democrats were perfect. they are on the right path for the most part. republicans dont know a damn thing about the proper way to govern. their economic ideas are either based out of ignorance or self-interest, and their social ideas are negative, hateful, and oppressive, and close minded.
-
i never said democrats were perfect. they are on the right path for the most part. republicans dont know a damn thing about the proper way to govern. their economic ideas are either based out of ignorance or self-interest, and their social ideas are negative, hateful, and oppressive, and close minded.
::)
-
i never said democrats were perfect. they are on the right path for the most part. republicans dont know a damn thing about the proper way to govern. their economic ideas are either based out of ignorance or self-interest, and their social ideas are negative, hateful, and oppressive, and close minded.
Did they pass the free KY AMMENDment over there?
-
::)
do you honestly think that anything going on in the economy right now has anything to do with obama? (despite the fact that we arent in a depression)
-
do you honestly think that anything going on in the economy right now has anything to do with obama? (despite the fact that we arent in a depression)
No..he's doing a great job. Bringing the UE numbers from 5% to 10% in 18 months when he said it would never get beyond 8% was pure genus.
-
No..he's doing a great job. Bringing the UE numbers from 5% to 10% in 18 months when he said it would never get beyond 8% was pure genus.
do you realize that everything obama did with the economy was handed to him by bush?? the entire mess, and the entire solution. he did what was necessary at the time to avoid a complete collapse of our financial system. and it woudl be collapsed right now had he not done it. bush was going to do the same thing, and so would have mccain. obama was a dumb pussy for listening to his economic advisers who were a bunch of self interested hacks. hes just like clinton, an indecisive slave to the polls.