Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 02:45:04 PM

Title: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 02:45:04 PM
in your average individual.

Agree or disagree?

I have certainly found that to be the case with me. Over the years I have gotten stronger but made very little progress mass wise despite eating tons at timea; strength went up but I didn't notice any great changes in body composition.

What has been your experience?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: benchmstr on November 03, 2010, 02:46:23 PM
i agree that if you eat too much bacon before going to the gym you have a shitty workout...

bench
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 02:47:15 PM
i agree that if you eat too much bacon before going to the gym you have a shitty workout...

bench

Do you agree with my overall premise?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: benchmstr on November 03, 2010, 02:49:07 PM
Do you agree with my overall premise?
havent read it.....i was going to when i clicked on the thread...but i lost interest

bench
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: Cleanest Natural on November 03, 2010, 02:49:33 PM
Do you suffer from LDS ? serious question
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 02:50:18 PM
Do you suffer from LDS ? serious question

Not to my knowledge.

What has your experience been?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: flinstones1 on November 03, 2010, 02:51:27 PM
I dont know anyone who can bench 405 for 10 who isnt decently big.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: benchmstr on November 03, 2010, 02:52:16 PM
Do you agree with my overall premise?
ok...after reading it i kinda agree....i cant fully agree simply cause everyone is different...(hence food allergies)

for instance....my arms were weak at there biggest compared to how they are now several inches smaller....i guess it just depends how far you take it....and what type of muscle you given is made of..

bench
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 02:52:36 PM
I dont know anyone who can bench 405 for 10 who isnt decently big.

Well, ok, at those weights but for normal people who can't even bench 405 for one...what do you think?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: benchmstr on November 03, 2010, 02:52:58 PM
I dont know anyone who can bench 405 for 10 who isnt decently big.
ever been to a pwerlifting meet?

bench
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: cyp200la on November 03, 2010, 02:55:07 PM
agree
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: andreisdaman on November 03, 2010, 02:57:20 PM
in your average individual.

Agree or disagree?

I have certainly found that to be the case with me. Over the years I have gotten stronger but made very little progress mass wise despite eating tons at timea; strength went up but I didn't notice any great changes in body composition.

What has been your experience?


I agree with this..strength has gone up over the years but I basically stay the same....I'm somewhat bigger than a few years ago but in general I haven't changed physically the way I would have liked to ....
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: flinstones1 on November 03, 2010, 02:58:31 PM
ever been to a pwerlifting meet?

bench

yes numerous ones. I have competed in powerlifting before and totaled over 1000 raw at the age of 16. Trust me there is nobody who goes from benching 135 pound bench press to 500 pound raw bench, who takes drugs, who isnt somewhat big if they take nutrition seriously. Seen the size of Matt Kroc?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 02:59:02 PM

I agree with this..strength has gone up over the years but I basically stay the same....I'm somewhat bigger than a few years ago but in general I haven't changed physically the way I would have liked to ....

The more I talk to guys the more this seems to be a common experience for many of us. I think the people who get bigger and bigger as well as stronger are in the genetic elite.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: Cleanest Natural on November 03, 2010, 03:02:38 PM
Not to my knowledge.

What has your experience been?
I have never had it

I might be wrong but u seem that type of guy
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 03:04:26 PM
I have never had it

I might be wrong but u seem that type of guy

Actually I was referring to strength vs. size. What has been your experience?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: Cleanest Natural on November 03, 2010, 03:16:44 PM
Actually I was referring to strength vs. size. What has been your experience?
are u a fondler or a fondleree ?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: _bruce_ on November 03, 2010, 03:28:08 PM
Depends on how strong you are - properly programmed or really strong in the flesh... or both.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Boost on November 03, 2010, 03:33:38 PM
Some guys just are not built to be big OR strong

If you've got thin wrists and poor forearms,

your best bet is to get as lean as possible.

Bulking up does nothing for these people
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: WillGrant on November 03, 2010, 03:35:10 PM
in your average individual.

Agree or disagree?

I have certainly found that to be the case with me. Over the years I have gotten stronger but made very little progress mass wise despite eating tons at timea; strength went up but I didn't notice any great changes in body composition.

What has been your experience?
What rep ranges are you talking about ?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 03:36:20 PM
What rep ranges are you talking about ?

Hmm...I guess anywhere from 6-10.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Boost on November 03, 2010, 03:38:44 PM
Hmm...I guess anywhere from 6-10.
Have you tried faster paced, less time between sets,

"Pump" workouts. Could work for you.

Obviously progressive strength gains are not working for you
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: flinstones1 on November 03, 2010, 03:40:40 PM
Some guys just are not built to be big OR strong

If you've got thin wrists and poor forearms,

your best bet is to get as lean as possible.

Bulking up does nothing for these people

This is true and misleading. I mean of course benig realistic is required but an ectomorph who is huge and ripped looks diesel as fuck. Your right though that these guys will rarely lift huge weights cause their structure wont allow for it. Arnold hardly benched 405. But I do know some huge guys who started out extremely small jointed and ecto but it required alot more abuse then most woul need when it comes to drugs
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 03:42:52 PM
Have you tried faster paced, less time between sets,

"Pump" workouts. Could work for you.

Obviously progressive strength gains are not working for you

No, progressive strength gains did and do work. I increased my deadlift this year by almost 100lbs but I never got any new muscle. That is what I am talking about.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: BIG ACH on November 03, 2010, 03:47:01 PM


Deicide...

Whats your bodybuilding/weight lifting history? 

Eating history?

traiing history?

strategy? etc etc? 
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: flinstones1 on November 03, 2010, 03:47:05 PM
Basily I think with enough time and drugs anyone can be huge but not everyone can lift huge weights and be strong. I think strength is alot more genetic
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: BIG ACH on November 03, 2010, 03:47:42 PM

Btw I ask - not trying to bash you or anything honestly, just want to know!
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 03:48:45 PM
Basily I think with enough time and drugs anyone can be huge but not everyone can lift huge weights and be strong. I think strength is alot more genetic

Funny, I think the opposite (in terms of natural).
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 03:52:19 PM

Deicide...

Whats your bodybuilding/weight lifting history? 

Eating history?

traiing history?

strategy? etc etc? 

I started late, at around 27, am 33 now. Sure I look better now than when I started but it only took me about a year or two to realise that bbing wasn't anything I was gifted for. I have almost no sport/athletic gifts, just not in the genes. I have tried all kinds of eating strategies and training ones. This year was actually quite good (earlier) until I had a serious injury that took me out over two months. But they were all just strength gains. These days I just try to be healthy and don't lift with ego anymore. No point. A lot of strength left after the injury. These days, like I said, just try to be in decent shape and healthy. More important things in life for me than lifting weights.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Boost on November 03, 2010, 03:58:28 PM
WITHOUT DRUGS - High calorie diets and heavy weights are a disaster for most guys.

If you're not naturally very lean with a fast metabolism, most guys that "lift big and eat big" just end up smooth, watery and soft

These guys go from 180 to 230.......but have to cut back down to 165 to look anything like a bodybuilder.

Of course drugs change this.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 04:02:59 PM
WITHOUT DRUGS - High calorie diets and heavy weights are a disaster for most guys.

If you're not naturally very lean with a fast metabolism, most guys that "lift big and eat big" just end up smooth, watery and soft

These guys go from 180 to 230.......but have to cut back down to 165 to look anything like a bodybuilder.

Of course drugs change this.

I agree.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass ga
Post by: flinstones1 on November 03, 2010, 04:04:43 PM
Funny, I think the opposite (in terms of natural).

i agree   when training natural i think anyone can get to be pretty strong but not  really big or freaky strong. With enough drugs I think everyone can be very big strong but not everyone can lift freak weights
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: affeman on November 03, 2010, 04:06:54 PM
I started late, at around 27, am 33 now. Sure I look better now than when I started but it only took me about a year or two to realise that bbing wasn't anything I was gifted for. I have almost no sport/athletic gifts, just not in the genes. I have tried all kinds of eating strategies and training ones. This year was actually quite good (earlier) until I had a serious injury that took me out over two months. But they were all just strength gains. These days I just try to be healthy and don't lift with ego anymore. No point. A lot of strength left after the injury. These days, like I said, just try to be in decent shape and healthy. More important things in life for me than lifting weights.

Starting out that late it's almost impossible to lean out without the use of drugs. Your fat depots are already pretty persistent in your late 20s, hard to get rid of them when you carried them with u all your life.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 03, 2010, 04:10:16 PM
Starting out that late it's almost impossible to lean out without the use of drugs. Your fat depots are already pretty persistent in your late 20s, hard to get rid of them when you carried them with u all your life.

There's a lot to be said for starting being active at a very young age; it has lifetime benefits, whether lifting or not. It's really hard to reverse a life long sedentary lifestyle. I agree with you.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: andreisdaman on November 03, 2010, 06:05:16 PM
WITHOUT DRUGS - High calorie diets and heavy weights are a disaster for most guys.

If you're not naturally very lean with a fast metabolism, most guys that "lift big and eat big" just end up smooth, watery and soft

These guys go from 180 to 230.......but have to cut back down to 165 to look anything like a bodybuilder.

Of course drugs change this.
Good point..they also wind up in lots of pain from sore joints

Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: BIG ACH on November 03, 2010, 07:12:54 PM

This is Neal Grossman, a good friend of mine, he started at 55, this picture is taken of him at 60, and he beats guys in their 20's!

(http://bodybuildingsenior.com/bbs/images/Friends/NealGrossman3.jpg)


Never too late to start.  Deicide, I'm sorry to hear about your injury, what happened?  What were you eating?  How much did you weigh when you started?  What about at your peak?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: DK II on November 03, 2010, 07:15:47 PM
havent read it.....i was going to when i clicked on the thread...but i lost interest

bench

x2
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: kh300 on November 03, 2010, 09:01:42 PM
I'm sorry but if you put 100lbs on your dead and didnt get any larger,,then you either eat like shit or have horrible genetics.

In my experience guys that use progression, weather high reps low reps, whatever, are the ones making gains.

I go to the gym every morning and see the same people. Most guys I could tell you exactly what they will do up to the exact weights they'll use. and guess what, after years they look the same,and they will continue to look the same.

I see a group of 3 college age kids who have their notepads out, which means they're tracking their progress, and they are blowing up.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: DK II on November 03, 2010, 09:13:31 PM
I'm sorry but if you put 100lbs on your dead and didnt get any larger,,then you either eat like shit or have horrible genetics.

In my experience guys that use progression, weather high reps low reps, whatever, are the ones making gains.

I go to the gym every morning and see the same people. Most guys I could tell you exactly what they will do up to the exact weights they'll use. and guess what, after years they look the same,and they will continue to look the same.

I see a group of 3 college age kids who have their notepads out, which means they're tracking their progress, and they are blowing up.

I agree with that.

Also, the biggest guy in the gym will also be the strongest.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 03, 2010, 10:09:25 PM
in your average individual.

Agree or disagree?

I have certainly found that to be the case with me. Over the years I have gotten stronger but made very little progress mass wise despite eating tons at timea; strength went up but I didn't notice any great changes in body composition.

What has been your experience?

  Strength and mass are correlated. Sarcomers don't become stronger, so the only way for a muscle to become stronger is by increasing the amount of sarcomers. Thus strength gains can come only from an increase in the number of sarcomers or increased efficiency in mobilizing muscle fibers(muscle fibers are amalgamations of sarcomers). Since leverage is dependent upon muscular attachment location to the bones, and since this is stable, then it is not a factor affecting strength. There is some strength gains by learning to position one's physique so as to maximize leverage, but this is very minumum. The reason why some people gain more strength than mass is because they gain neuromuscular efficiency which allows them to mobilize more sarcomers whilst performing exercises, so they can increase strength to a degree higher than what would be possible for a given amount of muscle gain. And also because they learn to position their bodies so as to maximize leverage although this is very, very minimum.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: suckmymuscle on November 03, 2010, 10:21:03 PM
No, progressive strength gains did and do work. I increased my deadlift this year by almost 100lbs but I never got any new muscle. That is what I am talking about.

  To understand why this happens, you need to understand two things about the deadlift. First, the deadlift is an exercise that mobilies your entire physique, so the muscle gains are distributed throughout your frame and not on a specific muscle, so you can't see the gains because individual muscles grow very little in response to this exercise. That is, increasing your deadlift by 30 lbs causes less visible muscle gains than increasing your barbell curl strength by 30 lbs because in the case of the barbell curl all the muscle gains will be concentrated on biceps, whilst with the deadlift they will be distributed throughout your entire body so the increase in size of each individual bodypart will be much smaller. The second reason for this is that the deadlift requires enormous neuromuscular coordination, so you become better and better at mobilizing your musle fibers the more you do the exercise, meaning that you can increase your strength dramatically in this exercise without increasing muscle as much. You probably only gained about 10 lbs of muscle by increasing your strength on this exercise by 100 lbs due to improved neuromuscular efficiency, and it is distributed throughout all your body and not on a localized muscle so you can't see it. But I assure you positively that you have gained muscle from it. If you continue to increase your strength in this particular exercise, you will start gaining more muscle because by now your strength increases due to improved neuromuscular coordination have stabilized because you can't mobilize more sarcomers than you have, so the only way for increased strength after neuromuscular efficiency has been maximized is to increase the amount of sarcomers. Nothing adds as much mass as the deadlift.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: CalvinH on November 04, 2010, 08:32:49 AM
Zzzzz....
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Omega on November 04, 2010, 09:52:19 AM
Some guys just are not built to be big OR strong

If you've got thin wrists and poor forearms,

your best bet is to get as lean as possible.

Bulking up does nothing for these people

Flex Wheeler should have gave up before he even started  ::)
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 04, 2010, 09:58:07 AM
Deicide....don't you ever get tired of constantly posting the same shit with a slightly different twist every time ?

you have lousy genetics...what do you want us to do about it?
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: CalvinH on November 04, 2010, 10:30:41 AM
Deicide....don't you ever get tired of constantly posting the same shit with a slightly different twist every time ?

you have lousy genetics...what do you want us to do about it?



Read thread after thread he starts.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Fury on November 04, 2010, 10:38:16 AM
Starting out that late it's almost impossible to lean out without the use of drugs. Your fat depots are already pretty persistent in your late 20s, hard to get rid of them when you carried them with u all your life.

That's nothing more than a shitty excuse for people when they can't get in shape and give up after 2 weeks of "hard" dieting.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 04, 2010, 02:21:14 PM
I'm sorry but if you put 100lbs on your dead and didnt get any larger,,then you either eat like shit or have horrible genetics.

In my experience guys that use progression, weather high reps low reps, whatever, are the ones making gains.

I go to the gym every morning and see the same people. Most guys I could tell you exactly what they will do up to the exact weights they'll use. and guess what, after years they look the same,and they will continue to look the same.

I see a group of 3 college age kids who have their notepads out, which means they're tracking their progress, and they are blowing up.

This.
Title: Re: Generally speaking, potential for strength gains is greater than for mass gains
Post by: Deicide on November 04, 2010, 02:25:21 PM
This is Neal Grossman, a good friend of mine, he started at 55, this picture is taken of him at 60, and he beats guys in their 20's!

(http://bodybuildingsenior.com/bbs/images/Friends/NealGrossman3.jpg)


Never too late to start.  Deicide, I'm sorry to hear about your injury, what happened?  What were you eating?  How much did you weigh when you started?  What about at your peak?

At the time of my injury I was my strongest ever. I was leg pressing a lot of weight (for me) and I lowered it too much maybe, I don't know, but my lower back went crunch. Doctor said I was super lucky there was no permanent damage. At the time I was having maybe 2 steaks with veggies and baked potatos every day, with cereal and fruit in the morning plu 2-4 protein shakes as well as a massive pig out meal every couple of days. I have never looked at my weight, more my body composition. I just know that at 20 I was 220lbs and obese and at 33 I am under 200 and have a very different build. It's better than nothing.