Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Meso_z on November 07, 2010, 12:51:38 AM

Title: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Meso_z on November 07, 2010, 12:51:38 AM
Guess this guys weight
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: WillGrant on November 07, 2010, 12:53:58 AM
Guess this guys weight
Looks good  :)
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: epic_alien on November 07, 2010, 12:58:23 AM
140lbs
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Meso_z on November 07, 2010, 01:10:07 AM
140lbs

yep, a bit lower..134 if i recall. amazing isnt it..
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: The True Adonis on November 07, 2010, 01:10:54 AM
yep, a bit lower..134 if i recall. amazing isnt it..
How tall?
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: WillGrant on November 07, 2010, 01:17:27 AM
How tall?
Taller than his fridge
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Meso_z on November 07, 2010, 01:19:33 AM
How tall?
i dont know but looks short.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: WillGrant on November 07, 2010, 01:44:00 AM
i dont know but looks short.
I BET HE GOT LIKE THAT USING THE ADONIS DIET  ;D
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Meso_z on November 07, 2010, 01:51:09 AM
I BET HE GOT LIKE THAT USING THE ADONIS DIET  ;D
:D
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: alnassak on November 07, 2010, 01:58:21 AM
Great midsection.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: mass243 on November 07, 2010, 01:08:30 AM
Huge! But calves look tiny...
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Team Diver on November 07, 2010, 01:09:16 AM
good tan (no homo)
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: devilsmile on November 07, 2010, 02:05:58 AM
Guess this guys weight

actually the guy isn't exactly small.... I'm sure if you put him next to wiggs or alex23 for example, they wouldn't be MUCH  bigger... they would prolly only have the bulkyness that is bigger over them but other than that, that guys isn't "small"  ::)

And he is sexy guy and a pussy wrecking machine clearly  :P
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: MattT on November 07, 2010, 02:28:06 AM
kid has a great natural physique at 132lbs to be exact in that pic.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Stark on November 07, 2010, 02:47:23 AM
that looks insane  :o :o :o
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Tito24 on November 07, 2010, 03:09:00 AM
all nice and well but when you are a dwarf, having that physique is pointless.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: freespirit on November 07, 2010, 03:22:06 AM
all nice and well but when you are a dwarf, having that physique is pointless.

It's better to be a good looking dwarf than a skinny-fat or chubby dwarf. He's just making the best out of it, and that needs dedication and discipline.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Meso_z on November 07, 2010, 03:24:40 AM
kid has a great natural physique at 132lbs to be exact in that pic.
do you have contact with the guy? whats his diet? I really do believe hes a natty (although most of the times I smell bullshit and lies).
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: wes on November 07, 2010, 03:31:10 AM
Looks great.

Some of the best abs I`ve ever seen.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: dogbowl on November 07, 2010, 03:40:19 AM
all nice and well but when you are a dwarf, having that physique is pointless.

How is it pointless? You should strive for the best physique you can get, regardless of your height.

Guy looks great.  Bigger isn't always better, absolutely.  He'd probably look smaller if he gained 20 pounds.

Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Tito24 on November 07, 2010, 03:42:30 AM
thats true. but it would be a whole lot more fun to be tall with that physique
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 07, 2010, 05:02:21 AM
How is it pointless? You should strive for the best physique you can get, regardless of your height.

Guy looks great.  Bigger isn't always better, absolutely.  He'd probably look smaller if he gained 20 pounds.

 

Lol I out weight him by 100 pounds. So unless I moved to a warmer climate he'd just look like a guy that's fit in cloth's. My point is it's pointless trying to look big if your under 5 9. It's nice to be healthy but when your knee high to a grass hoper, convincing someone your a big guy probally ain't your best argument. Your far better off trying to convince people size don't matter by singing or some queer shit like that.   
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on November 07, 2010, 06:05:36 AM
134 lbs?  LMAO! I guarantee you if you saw this dude in person he would look like a tiny tit.  He looks good but with clothes on and standing next to average sized people say in a gym or at the bar he'd look tiny.  The picture, the mirrors etc. give him a huge advantage.  134lbs is fucking tiny no matter how good you look.  And what's sad is muscle usually weighs more than fat.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 07, 2010, 06:15:46 AM
134 lbs?  LMAO! I guarantee you if you saw this dude in person he would look like a tiny tit.  He looks good but with clothes on and standing next to average sized people say in a gym or at the bar he'd look tiny.  The picture, the mirrors etc. give him a huge advantage.  134lbs is fucking tiny no matter how good you look.  And what's sad is muscle usually weighs more than fat.

QFT.....  In clothes he would look like a 9th grader.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: DK II on November 07, 2010, 06:34:10 AM
QFT.....  In clothes he would look like a 9th grader.

Yup, great conditioning, but even in the gym he will look tiny.

Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: no one on November 07, 2010, 06:35:57 AM
134 or 234, the guys is fantastic shape. a lot of guys can get lean. getting that lean is another level. good for him.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Tapeworm on November 07, 2010, 07:28:55 AM
Yes great conditioning but those socks are gayer than braking for a yellow light. 
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lord of the Roidz on November 07, 2010, 07:32:59 AM
Hard to believe that's all the guy weighs. How short is he? He looks fairly thick..not like a Bruce Lee 130 pounds.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Marty Champions on November 07, 2010, 07:34:47 AM
conditioning spot on but the man is quite a fragile ornament compared to most getbiggers
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Bobby on November 07, 2010, 10:59:45 AM
If he at least weighed 165 your argument would be solid, but who wants to weigh less than a woman ???
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: johnnynoname on November 07, 2010, 11:03:46 AM
amazing how a guy who looks that amazing can actually get criticism on here
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Boost on November 07, 2010, 11:06:41 AM
Phenomenal.

Incredible willpower to maintain that bf level
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: kevcat on November 07, 2010, 11:07:29 AM
actually the guy isn't exactly small.... I'm sure if you put him next to wiggs or alex23 for example, they wouldn't be MUCH  bigger... they would prolly only have the bulkyness that is bigger over them but other than that, that guys isn't "small"  ::)

And he is sexy guy and a pussy wrecking machine clearly  :P

I love how other men think guys are 'pussy wrecking machines' because they have abs :L no one ever think that women generally only give a fuck about your face, or at least personality  ;D
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: johnnynoname on November 07, 2010, 11:10:56 AM
I love how other men think guys are 'pussy wrecking machines' because they have abs :L no one ever think that women generally only give a fuck about your face, or at least personality  ;D

again for the 1000000000th time

girls don't like boys
girls like cars and money

Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 07, 2010, 11:13:42 AM
amazing how a guy who looks that amazing can actually get criticism on here
It's because it's get big and not get fashionable.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Deicide on November 07, 2010, 11:33:22 AM
Phenomenal.

Incredible willpower to maintain that bf level


Or genetics.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Boost on November 07, 2010, 11:36:58 AM
Or genetics.
Maybe you're just overeating and don't know what real hunger is?

You're not willing to suffer
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Tito24 on November 07, 2010, 11:37:34 AM
i think its more to do with genetics than willpower
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Deicide on November 07, 2010, 11:38:13 AM
Maybe you're just overeating and don't know what real hunger is?

You're not willing to suffer

Actually I am willing to suffer...today I didn't have much more than 1600 calories and my eating is finished for the day. Suffering for weeks on end is another story though... ;D
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Boost on November 07, 2010, 11:41:23 AM
i think its more to do with genetics than willpower
In my opinion anyone can get shredded.

But no one wants to really suffer.

Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Deicide on November 07, 2010, 11:43:00 AM
In my opinion anyone can get shredded.

But no one wants to really suffer.



True, which means the people who are shredded are usually shredded because of genetics, not suffering.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: BayGBM on November 07, 2010, 11:43:26 AM
Guess this guys weight

Great shape, but I wouldn't want to be that small.  :(
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: johnnynoname on November 07, 2010, 11:44:18 AM
genes play a part...to a extent
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Boost on November 07, 2010, 11:44:38 AM
True, which means the people who are shredded are usually shredded because of genetics, not suffering.
Are you still fat?
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Tito24 on November 07, 2010, 11:44:48 AM
yes but shredded means small unless you juice. its nice to be in good shape on the beach but whats the point of looking like an anorexic dude in clothes all year.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Deicide on November 07, 2010, 11:44:57 AM
Great shape, but I wouldn't want to be that small.  :(

Looking at your pic, you obviously have excellent bbing genetics.

BTW, you do realise most women prefer that to 280lbs of bloated muscle, right?
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Deicide on November 07, 2010, 11:45:47 AM
Are you still fat?

Less fat than I was before; right now maybe at 16% or thereabouts give or take a percent.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Cableguy on November 07, 2010, 02:17:55 PM
That's just what I'd like to look like... :)
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: dj181 on November 07, 2010, 02:42:02 PM
I know that Im gonna get flamed for saying this, but dat dude would be even more impressive if he mid-section wasnt so thickly muscled. The more tiny the waist is the bigger and more impressive everything else looks. Its all bout creating an illusion baby!
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 07, 2010, 03:33:44 PM
188lbs  :o
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: 240 is Back on November 07, 2010, 03:38:57 PM
QFT.....  In clothes he would look like a 9th grader.

no pedo?
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: 240 is Back on November 07, 2010, 03:41:22 PM
You give that guy and Trey brewer each 14 weeks to get in shape.

Trey can use DNP get in 5% bodyfat range.
That guy can bulk up 2.7 pounds, and come in at 5% bodyfat.

So this twink says the bigger guy pwns the small dude in the BBing dept.  In the feminine backside painting dept, I give buck-thirty the edge about 51% of the time.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Cableguy on November 07, 2010, 03:52:57 PM
That picture of Samir from '83 sums up for me what bodybuilding SHOULD be all about... :D
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 07, 2010, 03:59:15 PM
That picture of Samir from '83 sums up for me what bodybuilding SHOULD be all about... :D

One of my all-time favorites
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Cableguy on November 07, 2010, 04:16:58 PM
One of my all-time favorites

Yup, same for me.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Firemuscle on November 07, 2010, 04:20:35 PM
Guess this guys weight

 This is what i'm going for these days. Shape, density, cuts, fullness, but I don;t care much about overall size.

 Bulking up, rasing my blood pressure and getting chubby to play the size game just ain't cool to me anymore.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: johnnynoname on November 07, 2010, 04:22:25 PM
You give that guy and Trey brewer each 14 weeks to get in shape.

Trey can use DNP get in 5% bodyfat range.
That guy can bulk up 2.7 pounds, and come in at 5% bodyfat.

So this twink says the bigger guy pwns the small dude in the BBing dept. In the feminine backside painting dept, I give buck-thirty the edge about 51% of the time.

How do we know if the smaller guy is a "pimp"?  Is he rich?  Is he a good liar?

Remember, PHYSIQUE HAS LITTLE TO NOTHING TO DO WITH GETTING WOMEN- IT ALL COMES DOWN TO MONEY AND BULLSHIT*

*the exception being "Cougars" who fuck just about anything that will talk to them
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Rearden Metal on November 07, 2010, 04:46:05 PM
Lol I out weight him by 100 pounds. So unless I moved to a warmer climate he'd just look like a guy that's fit in cloth's. My point is it's pointless trying to look big if your under 5 9. It's nice to be healthy but when your knee high to a grass hoper, convincing someone your a big guy probally ain't your best argument. Your far better off trying to convince people size don't matter by singing or some queer shit like that.   

And I weigh nearly the same as you, and am 5'3". Might be a midget but I make you look like a stalk of grass.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Firemuscle on November 07, 2010, 04:48:57 PM
 If you are trying to get pussy with your physique, playing the size game is the wrong strategy.

 Especially these days, most women don't want a bulky guy.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 07, 2010, 05:19:29 PM
Vinny Pac would knock this tiny tit out.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: jude2 on November 07, 2010, 05:34:57 PM
How tall?
Has to be about 5'2 to have that much lean muscle and only weigh 132.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: boonasty on November 07, 2010, 05:46:07 PM
yep, a bit lower..134 if i recall. amazing isnt it..

i find that hard to believe.  not calling you a liar but he's taller than a fridge and his physique is full and all muscle.  can't believe hes 134  in fact i don't unless that is not a standard fridge.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 07, 2010, 05:48:24 PM
i find that hard to believe.  not calling you a liar but he's taller than a fridge and his physique is full and all muscle.  can't believe hes 134  in fact i don't unless that is not a standard fridge.

Maybe it's one of those dorm room fridges?
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: boonasty on November 07, 2010, 05:55:07 PM
Maybe it's one of those dorm room fridges?

or one of the european ones.  he could be posing between smokes or between laundry washings of once a month or so.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 07, 2010, 05:56:26 PM
or one of the european ones.  he could be posing between smokes or between laundry washings of once a month or so.

 ;D  You could be right....i don't see any deodrant in the pic...
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: boonasty on November 07, 2010, 06:02:48 PM
;D  You could be right....i don't see any deodrant in the pic...
;D
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: dogbowl on November 07, 2010, 09:26:20 PM
I think it should be rephrased as "heavier isn't always better"

If you focus too much on what the scales say and ignore how you look in the mirror, you end up looking like frogtech or rippetoe
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Meso_z on November 08, 2010, 01:22:02 AM
about 140, from his fb.

natty? i think so....but is it posssible?
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Parker on November 08, 2010, 01:46:27 AM
about 140, from his fb.

natty? i think so....but is it posssible?
Pumbaa thinks he Natty...by the way, was Timon and Pumbaa a take on Abbot and Costello, or were they a undercover gay couple?
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: WillGrant on November 08, 2010, 01:58:17 AM
One of my all-time favorites
I thought Samir weighed just on or slightly under 200pds in those pics ?
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: crownshep on November 08, 2010, 03:01:30 AM
One of my all-time favorites

You`ll like this one.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 03:10:12 AM
I think it should be rephrased as "heavier isn't always better"

If you focus too much on what the scales say and ignore how you look in the mirror, you end up looking like frogtech or rippetoe
Whatever what matters to women is how other guys treat you. This is the shit fags don't get. It's not that a women cares how you look it's the guys that do. Women aren't visual they pick up on shit socially and don't even realize it. Sure if you're on a beach ripped as fucked other guys will treat you a little more whatever, but if your wearing clothes at a party your just a midget with abs.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Parker on November 08, 2010, 03:26:36 AM
If you are trying to get pussy with your physique, playing the size game is the wrong strategy.

 Especially these days, most women don't want a bulky guy.
Unless his name is Brian Pumper...then it's wait in line.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: affeman on November 08, 2010, 03:47:41 AM
about 140, from his fb.

natty? i think so....but is it posssible?

That guy is barely taller than the doorhandle :D

Cute how he tries to photograph himself from below to appear taller. :)
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 04:24:49 AM
Did a short guy steal your ex girlfriend or something?
Hey dude it's the truth. Chicks care more about how other people look at you more than you look. This guy would just be another dude in clothes. Might notice he works out, wouldn't be whoa big guy in the least. Saw a guy at the gym with the craziest taper v the other day, than saw him an hour later on the way to class, didn't even looked like he lifted and was short as shit. As I said if your below five six, placing importance in physique is a lost cause.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 04:34:18 AM
People can't help that they are short. Why not get jacked, whats wrong with working out to get bigger muscles? How is it a lost cause if they enjoy the way their physique looks? Do you only work out because of what chicks/other guys will think?  
I realized long ago, that I don't got the genetics to be a bodybuilder, I'd look like shit in a thong. I work out for personal health and happiness, I'd give up weights before I'd ever give up cardio. I'm tall though so this shit is just silly. I'm not huge in the least but no one I know even lifts, and we all know I'm the biggest person they know.

There's nothing wrong with being short, but it's the confusing message people try to promote. Size don't matter(mostly true), but then they try to confuse a bitch by spending a hour a day trying to "getbig". Fuck that'd be like me saying spelling ability don't matter and trying to get everyone on here to read my book.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 04:43:43 AM
I guess I just look at it from an aesthetic point of view, a short untrained physique vs a jacked short physique.. Is it compensating? I don't really think so, not if you think muscles look better than flab
My guess is norjway don't get anymore sun than newfoundland, how do people even know unless you've already dipped your wick in them. This is the stupid shit sites like this get you thinking about.
"how do I look in a thong"
"is my taper v perfect"
"is my bf too high"

It's stupid shit, in the real world your either fat or your not, lets not complicate this shit with BF percentage, and all this garbage, its utter nonsense.  Point is if I met you in real life I'd be way more impressed with the languages you know that'd what you'd ever look like naked.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Captain Equipoise on November 08, 2010, 04:56:54 AM
That guy represents everything that should be bodybuilding...

Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 04:57:51 AM
Yeah I agree, most of getbig are way too focused on their appearance. Thats just how it is on bodybuilding boards. I don't think about how I look in a thong to or my v taper, just about making small improvements and looking better
Meh you can't tell me you notice shit, that you never would without GB. My hip to waist ratio bothered me alot for a while. Than I noticed DW, and realized at my height a taper is fucking rare. This shit wouldn't even cross my mind without this site.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 05:04:33 AM
True, but we're kinda drifting away from the point. Which is, if you're short and wanna look better - for whatever reason -  then why shouldn't you
Depends if it's just the part of your daily fitness routine why not. But if your considering getting on gear, or sacrificing any time or happiness it's a fucking waste. Just look at Adonis, the amount of time he spends obsessing over food, just so he can look fit.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 05:14:01 AM
So you think its somehow more justifiable to spend lots of time on working out and nutrition if you are a monster? And he isn't a short guy so I don't see the relevance  ???
It's not about height it's about goals. If you wanna be a fitness model or look like a fitness model you gotta have the shape and face for it. And if you do have those go full steam ahead. However if you don't got it, don't bother trying to get it, your just wasting time, and effort that could better spent elsewhere. It's like an old guy trying to be young, it's better to be a good looking old guy than an old guy trying to look young. Or a good looking short guy, than a short guy trying to look big.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 05:16:47 AM
Making this a little less cryptic focusing on your weakness instead of focusing on your strength just makes you even weaker. Let's pretend it's arnie against, Al pachino, would it make sense for him to spend a year working out and doing a bunch of cycles so he don't look so small when he co stars with arnie, or should he spend a year learning the script so he can act him out of the water.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 05:21:56 AM
So where does the limit go for a short guy in terms of size before you find it stupid??
Depends does he have anything else to offer? It's about knowing to know when to cut your loss's and moving on to something else. I.E. If your under 5 10-11 for the love of god don't ever juice.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 05:49:43 AM
Most of the olympia lineup is under 5'10-11"  ???
And to ordinary people there just a bunch of dwarf freaks. Your just proving my point. This forum has warped your mind into thinking they don't look like retards.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Lundgren on November 08, 2010, 06:07:28 AM
I think they are way too big, as in I'd never like to look like that, but fact remains short bodybuilders fill out easier and around 5'9" seems to be the best height for bodybuilders? Don't you agree? Do you mean short guys should stick to fitness or something?
First off the IFBB should just die. Second it depends on the look your going for. If you live on a beach or land of the nords etc. If you got anyother things going for you(education languages music etc.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: dj181 on November 08, 2010, 06:28:18 AM
True dat! 5'6" to 5'9" is da best height for bodybuilding
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: gh15 on November 08, 2010, 08:24:23 AM
what makes you think he is natural? id love hearing this,,because he is petite and small?,, itold you before there are special cases where picture is hard to determine ,,this is one of those cases,,but! gh in low doses and the use of letro put with good oxandrolone/turinabol/winstrol/primobolan can result in this exact physiqe in those pictures,,in this case due to not known height and very misleading pictures since no one around its gonna have to be jusdged in real life or with more pictures,, in any case its a lower dose fella if uses and the most important thing for him is his dryness so he is LOADED ON RESEARCH PRODUCT if a user

gh15 approved
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on November 08, 2010, 01:36:56 PM
what makes you think he is natural? id love hearing this,,because he is petite and small?,, itold you before there are special cases where picture is hard to determine ,,this is one of those cases,,but! gh in low doses and the use of letro put with good oxandrolone/turinabol/winstrol/primobolan can result in this exact physiqe in those pictures,,in this case due to not known height and very misleading pictures since no one around its gonna have to be jusdged in real life or with more pictures,, in any case its a lower dose fella if uses and the most important thing for him is his dryness so he is LOADED ON RESEARCH PRODUCT if a user

gh15 approved

Yeah I didn't even comment on his natural status because he's not.  LMAO!  He's a tiny tit steroid user who is in excellent condition.  Leave it to getbiggers who live in fantasy land to bust a nut over some guy like that.  LOL. 
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: Emmortal on November 08, 2010, 02:24:20 PM
I showed 5 of my girlfriends this picture and the unanimous result was "gross" he looks like a roided out freak.  Even when I told them he only weighed about 140lbs they all said he was too lean and were not attracted to the physique.

Fucking women.
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: MuscleMcMannus on November 08, 2010, 02:26:59 PM
I showed 5 of my girlfriends this picture and the unanimous result was "gross" he looks like a roided out freak.  Even when I told them he only weighed about 140lbs they all said he was too lean and were not attracted to the physique.

Fucking women.

Dumb hoes.  Ask them what they think of this pic? 
Title: Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
Post by: dustin on November 08, 2010, 03:10:01 PM
People can't help that they are short. Why not get jacked, whats wrong with working out to get bigger muscles? How is it a lost cause if they enjoy the way their physique looks? Do you only work out because of what chicks/other guys will think? 

Exactly. Midget or not, he's jacked. Can't call him a tiny tit.