Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: musclecenter on November 19, 2010, 07:04:54 PM

Title: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: musclecenter on November 19, 2010, 07:04:54 PM
http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1931956_1970831,00.html (http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1931956_1970831,00.html)

No Ronnie Coleman,Jay Cutler...... :(
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: Evo on November 19, 2010, 07:08:27 PM
Has Arnie sat on Joe Weiders cock without any lube?
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: CARTEL on November 19, 2010, 07:11:25 PM
Those three pics pretty much sum up pro bodybuilding for me.

TIME you've done it again!
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: Schmoe Buster on November 19, 2010, 07:20:35 PM
Arnold and Lou are entertaining schmoes and only Steve Reeves is pulling pussy ::)
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on November 19, 2010, 07:24:33 PM
growth hormone is  a hell of a drug.....


(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=356410.0;attach=391775;image)
(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/lou_ferrigno/lou_ferrigno_028.jpg)
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: ThaRealist on November 19, 2010, 07:41:16 PM
The sad case of bodybuilding is that it has gone to the fags and you should be ashamed to build muscle being a straight male.... Just like everything else that is looked down upon being a straight white male....(blacks and latinos don't apply being a minority also) lol.....
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on November 19, 2010, 07:52:35 PM
http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1931956_1970831,00.html (http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1931956_1970831,00.html)

No Ronnie Coleman,Jay Cutler...... :(

Its the history of the Mr Universe.  Last official winner was Lou Ferrigno and then it was changed by the IFBB to be called the World Amatuer Champion to raise the status of the Mr Olympia
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: musclecenter on November 19, 2010, 08:06:44 PM
traditionally most medias know bodybuilders Arnold,Lou....only.
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: noworries on November 19, 2010, 08:35:01 PM
growth hormone is  a hell of a drug.....


(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=356410.0;attach=391775;image)
(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/lou_ferrigno/lou_ferrigno_028.jpg)


Yea it is.  I am sure the 20+ years of lifting weights didn't hurt either ::)

Way to show a teenage photo and one taken 25+ years later.  Good analogy ::)
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on November 19, 2010, 08:50:09 PM
http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1931956_1970831,00.html (http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1931956_1970831,00.html)

No Ronnie Coleman,Jay Cutler...... :(

Arnold laughing way to hard in comparison to the rest. A phony bullshitterpolitician in the making.
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on November 19, 2010, 09:02:34 PM
Yea it is.  I am sure the 20+ years of lifting weights didn't hurt either ::)

Way to show a teenage photo and one taken 25+ years later.  Good analogy ::)


wow, just wow


see, i wouldnt expect a  sickening ,morbidly obese insult to his family like yourself to know anything about the physiological and visual effects of different ergogenic aids


growth hormone  combined with steroids gives the body a very distinct look, that steroids alone does not produce..........if you knew ANYTHING about bodybuilding you would realize how fuckin stupid you look

age, and time in the gym has very little to do with it..........you see extremely young bodybuilders posted on here all the time that have this "look"....liek that alexi luzkov kid, or flex lewis, or pretty much any young bodybuilder around right now cause they are all using growth

yes the extra 20 years in the gym would of course contribute to his increased size and muscle maturity...............b ut those two pictures show how dramatic steroids  and growth compared to steroids alone make a body look


THATS WHY BODYBUILDERS IN THE 70s LOOKED A LOT DIFFERENT THEN BODYBUILDERS IN THE 90s and BEYOND


way to own yourself again you pathetic lump of embarrassment and defeat ::) ::) ::)


what are you even doing here on a bodybuilding board ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: Evo on November 20, 2010, 08:54:26 AM

wow, just wow


see, i wouldnt expect a  sickening ,morbidly obese insult to his family like yourself to know anything about the physiological and visual effects of different ergogenic aids


growth hormone  combined with steroids gives the body a very distinct look, that steroids alone does not produce..........if you knew ANYTHING about bodybuilding you would realize how fuckin stupid you look

age, and time in the gym has very little to do with it..........you see extremely young bodybuilders posted on here all the time that have this "look"....liek that alexi luzkov kid, or flex lewis, or pretty much any young bodybuilder around right now cause they are all using growth

yes the extra 20 years in the gym would of course contribute to his increased size and muscle maturity...............b ut those two pictures show how dramatic steroids  and growth compared to steroids alone make a body look


THATS WHY BODYBUILDERS IN THE 70 LOOKED A LOT DIFFERENT THEN BODYBUILDERS IN THE 90s and BEYOND


way to own yourself again you pathetic lump of embarrassment and defeat ::) ::) ::)


what are you even doing here on a bodybuilding board ::) ::) ::)

Very good post.
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: Army of One on November 20, 2010, 09:01:51 AM

wow, just wow


see, i wouldnt expect a  sickening ,morbidly obese insult to his family like yourself to know anything about the physiological and visual effects of different ergogenic aids


growth hormone  combined with steroids gives the body a very distinct look, that steroids alone does not produce..........if you knew ANYTHING about bodybuilding you would realize how fuckin stupid you look

age, and time in the gym has very little to do with it..........you see extremely young bodybuilders posted on here all the time that have this "look"....liek that alexi luzkov kid, or flex lewis, or pretty much any young bodybuilder around right now cause they are all using growth

yes the extra 20 years in the gym would of course contribute to his increased size and muscle maturity...............b ut those two pictures show how dramatic steroids  and growth compared to steroids alone make a body look


THATS WHY BODYBUILDERS IN THE 70 LOOKED A LOT DIFFERENT THEN BODYBUILDERS IN THE 90s and BEYOND


way to own yourself again you pathetic lump of embarrassment and defeat ::) ::) ::)


what are you even doing here on a bodybuilding board ::) ::) ::)

(http://i27.tinypic.com/2uqj28i.jpg)
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on November 20, 2010, 09:08:51 AM
(http://i27.tinypic.com/2uqj28i.jpg)


lol, where is that gif from
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: BayGBM on November 20, 2010, 06:28:21 PM
"In 1952, the NABBA added a category for professionals, the winner of which was also declared Mr. Universe. In this photo, Leo Robert, the 1955 pro winner, poses with his son Norman, age 4."

Did Norman eventually take up bodybuilding?  ???

Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: gh15 on November 20, 2010, 06:37:30 PM

wow, just wow


see, i wouldnt expect a  sickening ,morbidly obese insult to his family like yourself to know anything about the physiological and visual effects of different ergogenic aids


growth hormone  combined with steroids gives the body a very distinct look, that steroids alone does not produce..........if you knew ANYTHING about bodybuilding you would realize how fuckin stupid you look

age, and time in the gym has very little to do with it..........you see extremely young bodybuilders posted on here all the time that have this "look"....liek that alexi luzkov kid, or flex lewis, or pretty much any young bodybuilder around right now cause they are all using growth

yes the extra 20 years in the gym would of course contribute to his increased size and muscle maturity...............b ut those two pictures show how dramatic steroids  and growth compared to steroids alone make a body look


THATS WHY BODYBUILDERS IN THE 70s LOOKED A LOT DIFFERENT THEN BODYBUILDERS IN THE 90s and BEYOND


way to own yourself again you pathetic lump of embarrassment and defeat ::) ::) ::)


what are you even doing here on a bodybuilding board ::) ::) ::)

one of best posting on getbig ever,, VERY VERY GOOD,, read it 50 times onlyme,,he is right about every single letters in his post,,

why arent van b unsung james etc modersators?? they are the ones who need to moderate those steroid boards,,  i dont get it you give the moding power to peopel who are shady operations insted of to these guys who know alot moreand talk the truth ,,

gh15 approved
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on November 20, 2010, 11:02:11 PM
one of best posting on getbig ever,, VERY VERY GOOD,, read it 50 times onlyme,,he is right about every single letters in his post,,

why arent van b unsung james etc modersators?? they are the ones who need to moderate those steroid boards,,  i dont get it you give the moding power to peopel who are shady operations insted of to these guys who know alot moreand talk the truth ,,

gh15 approved

How dare you!!! Keith was in a Vuarnet sunglasses commercial for Christ sakes. I don't know what goes on in your part of the world, but in my part, Keith is considered royalty. I mean really, he must have cleared 350 bucks after taxes for that shoot. On the streets, that is considered big money.
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on November 20, 2010, 11:12:25 PM
Yea it is.  I am sure the 20+ years of lifting weights didn't hurt either ::)

Way to show a teenage photo and one taken 25+ years later.  Good analogy ::)

www.carlspackler.com/sounds/050.mp3
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: WillGrant on November 21, 2010, 01:41:56 AM

wow, just wow


see, i wouldnt expect a  sickening ,morbidly obese insult to his family like yourself to know anything about the physiological and visual effects of different ergogenic aids


growth hormone  combined with steroids gives the body a very distinct look, that steroids alone does not produce..........if you knew ANYTHING about bodybuilding you would realize how fuckin stupid you look

age, and time in the gym has very little to do with it..........you see extremely young bodybuilders posted on here all the time that have this "look"....liek that alexi luzkov kid, or flex lewis, or pretty much any young bodybuilder around right now cause they are all using growth

yes the extra 20 years in the gym would of course contribute to his increased size and muscle maturity...............b ut those two pictures show how dramatic steroids  and growth compared to steroids alone make a body look


THATS WHY BODYBUILDERS IN THE 70s LOOKED A LOT DIFFERENT THEN BODYBUILDERS IN THE 90s and BEYOND


way to own yourself again you pathetic lump of embarrassment and defeat ::) ::) ::)


what are you even doing here on a bodybuilding board ::) ::) ::)
This.
Title: Re: A Photo Brief History of Modern Bodybuilding from TIME.com
Post by: lesaucer on November 23, 2010, 05:11:59 PM
(http://i27.tinypic.com/2uqj28i.jpg)

x2 but lollllllll