Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Sports Discussion Boards => Topic started by: Option D on December 07, 2010, 11:21:11 AM
-
Jamie McCourt wins court rulingEmail Print Comments83 By Molly Knight
ESPN The Magazine
Archive
The judge presiding over the bitter battle for the Los Angeles Dodgers has granted Jamie McCourt's request to throw out the marital property agreement that gives her ex-husband sole ownership of the team.
A spokesman for Jamie McCourt, Mark Fabiani, says this clears the way for the Dodgers to be shared under California's community property law. If the ruling stands, it is possible that the Dodgers could be sold if one of the McCourts can't buy out the interests of the other.
In a 100-page decision given to attorneys for both parties, Superior Court Judge Scott Gordon found that the contract at the heart of the fight over the team was not valid or enforceable and that it must be set aside.
Frank McCourt's lawyer disputes that the ruling changes ownership of the Dodgers in any way.
"This ruling does nothing to change the ownership of the Dodgers," Marc Seltzer said in a statement. "Even without the marital property agreements in place, Jamie has no rights to the team. "Without the agreements in place, it becomes the court's job to determine which property is Frank's and which is Jamie's based on who holds legal title to the team. The facts are crystal clear on this point. The Dodgers are solely in Frank's name."
Attorneys for Frank McCourt already have indicated to the court that they plan to file another claim that would give their client sole ownership of the Dodgers, arguing that he bought the team with a company he established before he married Jamie McCourt.
Tuesday's ruling is supposed to bring an end to the first phase of the couple's contentious and costly division of assets.
More on the Dodgers
For more news, notes and analysis of the Dodgers, check out Dodger Thoughts from Jon Weisman. Blog
Frank McCourt had asked Gordon to uphold the post-nuptial agreement the couple signed in 2004 that gave him control of the Dodgers and gave Jamie McCourt the couple's considerable roster of multimillion-dollar homes. The McCourts were divorced last month after 31 years of marriage. They have four grown sons.
The ruling was not expected to affect the Dodgers operations, but it may lead both sides to resume settlement negotiations.
Fabiani said he saw the decision issued by Gordon but had not yet reviewed the entire document.
The ruling came after an 11-day trial that focused on whether the signed pact between Jamie and Frank McCourt in 2004 should decide who owns the team.
Frank McCourt contends the agreement gives the Dodgers to him. His estranged wife argues no one told her she gave up her purported stake in the team by signing the document. An attorney testified that there were actually two versions of the 10-page document, with only one giving Frank McCourt sole ownership of the team.
The couple have been embroiled in a nasty and costly divorce trial, where legal bills alone are estimated to top $20 million.
The case has provided the public a rare glimpse into the inner workings of a Major League Baseball team. Through testimony and reams of court documents, observers have learned about the Dodgers' finances and how the former couple's lavish lifestyle affected the team.
Although both sides gave differing accounts of what their intentions were when they signed the agreement, one aspect was clear -- neither of them read the agreement closely enough. The pact spelled out how their assets would be divided in the event of a divorce.
Jamie McCourt, 56, maintained she was the team's co-owner and would never have signed away her purported stake in the Dodgers had she know the agreement took it away from her.
Frank McCourt, 57, countered the pact was his wife's idea so she could protect her separate property -- a group of opulent homes -- from his business creditors.
Both took the witness stand during the trial and gave snapshots of their nearly 30-year marriage.
Jamie McCourt's legal team argued the pact wasn't valid because their client didn't have her own attorney when they signed the agreement, and Frank McCourt eventually agreed to make all their assets community property.
Frank McCourt's attorneys countered that their client is recognized by Major League Baseball as the sole owner of the Dodgers, and Jamie McCourt never identified herself as a co-owner.
The Dodgers were hemorrhaging tens of millions of dollars every year under previous owners before the team was purchased in 2004 for about $430 million most of which was financed by short-term loans, according to court documents.
Jamie McCourt testified that she and Frank McCourt frequently talked about selling the team if they couldn't turn around its financial misfortunes.
Most of the McCourts' assets have been tied up in real estate and they both argued in court documents they have been strapped for cash despite their affinity for spending. Court documents indicated the former couple has taken out more than $100 million in loans from Dodger-related businesses.
The McCourts often traveled by private jet, spent $14 million to rip out tennis courts to build an indoor, Olympic-size swimming pool and splurged on items such as designer clothing.
The McCourts also have argued about the value of the Dodgers and its facilities. Frank McCourt's legal team puts it somewhere between $800 million and $900 million, while Jamie McCourt estimates the potential amount at more than $2 billion.
Jamie McCourt was fired in October as the team's CEO where she drew a $2 million salary. She filed for divorce the same month, citing irreconcilable differences. The McCourts have been married since 1979 and have four grown sons.
Molly Knight is a reporter at ESPN The Magazine. Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.
-
In honor of the winter GM meetings, I hereby grant you a two day window to convert to Yankee fandom.
Join us.
-
In honor of the winter GM meetings, I hereby grant you a two day window to convert to Yankee fandom.
Join us.
Man.. you feel my pain.... but i got the dodger sign tatted on my back
-
Man.. you feel my pain.... but i got the dodger sign tatted on my back
classy :D
-
classy :D
LMAO.. I was DUMB...but i been a dodger fan since i was a kid... since Bulldog was pitching.. now.. we got Kershaw... :'(
-
Man.. you feel my pain.... but i got the dodger sign tatted on my back
It's OK.
One of my best friends was a Red Sox fan until 99 and he learned how they treated Mo Vaughn. He's been a Yankee fan ever since.
These invitations are rare, so you really should consider it. I don't let just anyone be a Yankee fan. You have to live it.
-
It's OK.
One of my best friends was a Red Sox fan until 99 and he learned how they treated Mo Vaughn. He's been a Yankee fan ever since.
These invitations are rare, so you really should consider it. I don't let just anyone be a Yankee fan. You have to live it.
apparently even derek jeter is no longer a yankee fan.
-
apparently even derek jeter is no longer a yankee fan.
@ $17,000,000/year for 3 years...at 50 years old...be better be... $17mil for 10 HR
-
This is the funniest thing i have read all week
Source: Yanks may target Crawford and Lee
No shit huh.. you dont say.. Yanks goin after the top 2 free agents in the NFL. Who wouldve thunk
-
@ $17,000,000/year for 3 years...at 50 years old...be better be... $17mil for 10 HR
i agree he's not worth that kind of money. it's more a pr thing first yankee to stay around long enough to get 3000 hits etc. also a link to the recent glory days. incidently the mets hit record all-time is 1490 by ed kranepool.
-
oops sorry kranepool had 1418 hits most by a met ever.
-
This is the funniest thing i have read all week
Source: Yanks may target Crawford and Lee
No shit huh.. you dont say.. Yanks goin after the top 2 free agents in the NFL. Who wouldve thunk
The only way this happens is if Pettitte retires, and they trade Granderson or Swisher for another pitcher. Otherwise, it makes no sense. Crawford's incremental value as a player over what the Yankees currently have is not worth the expense. Cashman recognizes this.
-
apparently even derek jeter is no longer a yankee fan.
He knows his agent started the public negotiations. He's met with Cashman and it's over. He got more money from them than any other team would have thought of paying.
-
The only way this happens is if Pettitte retires, and they trade Granderson or Swisher for another pitcher. Otherwise, it makes no sense. Crawford's incremental value as a player over what the Yankees currently have is not worth the expense. Cashman recognizes this.
youre gonna get LEE... AJ cant be your number 2 starter
-
youre gonna get LEE... AJ cant be your number 2 starter
MY number two starter, or OUR number two starter? C'mon Mal. Let me know where to send your new hat to.
-
MY number two starter, or OUR number two starter? C'mon Mal. Let me know where to send your new hat to.
i want to but i cant go to the dark side...
-
i want to but i cant go to the dark side...
Racist post reported.
-
Racist post reported.
Crawford to BOSOX.
So that means LEE definatley to Yankers..i mean Yankees
-
Crawford to BOSOX.
So that means LEE definatley to Yankers..i mean Yankees
That all depends on what Lee wants to do, and nothing to do with who Boston signs. Plus, the Yankees aren't reacting to anything Boston does - they have their game plan and are going to stick to it. They'll make a move none of us has even thought of.
-
I guess I :'(am the only American Dodger fan!
-
I guess I :'(am the only American Dodger fan!
Im American..did you mean Armenian....Dodger stadium is very close to Glendale...lol