Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Neurotoxin on January 11, 2011, 11:42:14 AM

Title: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Neurotoxin on January 11, 2011, 11:42:14 AM






















































































.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: kcballer on January 11, 2011, 11:43:58 AM
opinion unchanged

 ;D
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 11, 2011, 11:45:58 AM
Yeah, its thre RW who have a monpoly on hate and vile disgusting behavior.   ::)  ::)   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Kazan on January 11, 2011, 11:46:07 AM
First of all I don't care about Palin, but I still fail to see the connection other than the media trying to make one that doesn't exist.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: kcballer on January 11, 2011, 11:54:19 AM
First of all I don't care about Palin, but I still fail to see the connection other than the media trying to make one that doesn't exist.

I believe the connection they are making, however a stretch it may be, is to the gun sight on the district this woman represents. 

Poor taste and what looks to be political suicide. 

If we can have loonies like 333 post youtube of some guy 'connecting' obama to gay sex and drugs then this is far more plausible a connection. 
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 11, 2011, 11:56:04 AM
I believe the connection they are making, however a stretch it may be, is to the gun sight on the district this woman represents. 

Poor taste and what looks to be political suicide. 

If we can have loonies like 333 post youtube of some guy 'connecting' obama to gay sex and drugs then this is far more plausible a connection. 

So can I connect Obama to a guy killing someone with a gun in a knife fight?   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 11, 2011, 11:56:45 AM
I believe the connection they are making, however a stretch it may be, is to the gun sight on the district this woman represents. 

Poor taste and what looks to be political suicide. 

If we can have loonies like 333 post youtube of some guy 'connecting' obama to gay sex and drugs then this is far more plausible a connection. 

I feel sorry for you. You go above and beyond in proving how stupid you are.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Kazan on January 11, 2011, 11:58:33 AM
I believe the connection they are making, however a stretch it may be, is to the gun sight on the district this woman represents. 

Poor taste and what looks to be political suicide. 

If we can have loonies like 333 post youtube of some guy 'connecting' obama to gay sex and drugs then this is far more plausible a connection. 

Yes but we have seen the Democrat with sights on districts with the words behind enemy lines under it, why is it more plausible that the Palin chart is anymore responsible than the Dem chart? The fact still remains the shooter worked for the Gifford campaign in 2007.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 11, 2011, 12:03:03 PM
He also has been infatuated with her since 2007 after teir meeting to wherehe was upset with her answers to his questions.   

Why des KC, Benny, 240, Danny, keep ignoring this?   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: MCWAY on January 11, 2011, 12:03:17 PM
I believe the connection they are making, however a stretch it may be, is to the gun sight on the district this woman represents. 

Poor taste and what looks to be political suicide. 

If we can have loonies like 333 post youtube of some guy 'connecting' obama to gay sex and drugs then this is far more plausible a connection. 

There is no such connection. The shooter worked to get Gifford elected to office and had been talking with her since 2007, before we ever heard of Sarah Palin.

And, there's the little matter of this guy being strung out on dope, with a big fat copy of Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf in his possession and a occultic/Satanic shrine.

But, the left-winged goofballs in the media didn't bother looking hard into that.

It just confirms what I (and others) have long suspected: Not only is the mainstream media in bed with the Obama Administration, it appears their favorite position is "Face-down; @$$-Up".

Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: dario73 on January 11, 2011, 12:05:28 PM
I believe the connection they are making,

Of course you do. You are a retard.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: MCWAY on January 11, 2011, 12:24:43 PM
I believe the connection they are making, however a stretch it may be, is to the gun sight on the district this woman represents. 

Poor taste and what looks to be political suicide. 

If we can have loonies like 333 post youtube of some guy 'connecting' obama to gay sex and drugs then this is far more plausible a connection. 

That "connection" has all the strength of soggy toilet paper, as there's no evidence this guy was even looking at that site. And, this fellow has been interfacing with Gifford, LONG BEFORE PALIN WAS EVER A NATIONAL FIGURE.

Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Hedgehog on January 11, 2011, 02:01:07 PM
i believe that Palin and her team will never get past this tragedy. if Palin runs for President there will be more posters printed with crosshairs and Gabrielle on them at rallies than posters with Sarah on them.

i truly think that her political career is over.

now, is Palin responsible for this shooting? obviously, she is not directly responsible.

words have consequences though.




-NT

I think a good example is tomorrow when the President is bound to make an appareance in Az.

Pt Obama needs to speak responsible, more than anyone else. Since he's the most powerful guy in the world right now.

So how he acts in a moment like this will be very interesting.

Will he call for a "truce", so to speak. And give everyone a sense of feeling helped.

Or will he say something that only will nurse those who are supporting him?


The toxic political environment may have played a part in this. But it does absolutely no good to point out scapegoats, or persons you may believe are responsible.

Because it ain't gonna make it easier for them to back off. It will just continue the constant bickering.

It would be much better to avoid mentioning names at all. Or pointing to certain groups.

After all, it is "united we stand, divided we fall" right?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: George Whorewell on January 11, 2011, 02:24:06 PM
Oh give me a fucking break. The guy was clearly insane. Political discourse has NOTHING to do with this incident. Anyone who says otherwise is delusional or has an anti conservative/ anti free speech agenda. Until facts to the contrary come out in court, the shooter was obsessed with Gifford, clearly unbalanced, had a drug problem, was expelled from college recently and was an all around nut job. He also had some sort of Satan worship altar in his backyard.

He was a registered independent, didn't vote in the 2010 election and had been following Gifford around since 2007.

Only faggy liberals that still can't get over the fact that most Americans can't stand them or this president are trying to exploit this tragedy to get sympathy from the public while demonizing conservatives in the process.

Again-- THERE IS NOT ONE SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE that this shooting was politically motivated. NONE. 
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Bindare_Dundat on January 12, 2011, 06:03:05 AM
Everyone on here knows Im not a Palin fan but Im getting tired of these threads and the pin hole perspective people are  using in this situation.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 06:04:16 AM
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/137403-palin-accuses-media-of-blood-libel-in-giffords-shooting-aftermath


feeling a little guilty,not saying see had anything to do with it, but she is feeling guilty
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 06:10:53 AM
Yeah ok.  She has been accused of murder by far left communists and you expect her to be silent in the face of such bullshit?   Sorry, those days are long over where the far left gets away w this crap.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: tonymctones on January 12, 2011, 06:12:58 AM
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/137403-palin-accuses-media-of-blood-libel-in-giffords-shooting-aftermath


feeling a little guilty,not saying see had anything to do with it, but she is feeling guilty
lol man you liberals love to reach
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 06:28:37 AM
First of all I don't care about Palin, but I still fail to see the connection other than the media trying to make one that doesn't exist.


333 is gonna hunt you down and bombard your home with Photoshoped pictures of palin holding prop guns and saying hello to regan.. youre in for it now
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 06:30:20 AM
Of course you do. You are a retard.

uh ohhhhhhhhhhhhh  :o Youre in for it now.. Palin is gonna read this and then call for you to be fired... oh that is unless youre on the Right.. then its all good.. 
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 06:30:21 AM
Even people who don't like her are disgusted what the media is going. 
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: whork25 on January 12, 2011, 06:52:24 AM
Im not.

In this case is not her faulth but its just a matter of time before some nutjob take her seriously and shoots Obama or another dem.

She has called Obama for Hitler
She has said that Obamacare has Death Camps like the Nazis
Called Obama a terrorist


If you take Palin seriously and believes what she is saying its almost your duty to shoot Obama.
She is putting other peoples lives at risk to further her agenda i dont know how you could feel sympathy towards her.


Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 06:56:50 AM
Im not.

In this case is not her faulth but its just a matter of time before some nutjob take her seriously and shoots Obama or another dem.

She has called Obama for Hitler
She has said that Obamacare has Death Camps like the Nazis
Called Obama a terrorist


If you take Palin seriously and believes what she is saying its almost your duty to shoot Obama.
She is putting other peoples lives at risk to further her agenda i dont know how you could feel sympathy towards her.





 ::)  ::)


Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 07:00:31 AM
Im not.

In this case is not her faulth but its just a matter of time before some nutjob take her seriously and shoots Obama or another dem.

She has called Obama for Hitler
She has said that Obamacare has Death Camps like the Nazis
Called Obama a terrorist


If you take Palin seriously and believes what she is saying its almost your duty to shoot Obama.
She is putting other peoples lives at risk to further her agenda i dont know how you could feel sympathy towards her.





they call it puppy love :D :D









Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 07:02:08 AM
Bumping your own gimmick's post. How desperate for attention are you?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: whork25 on January 12, 2011, 07:02:33 AM
 ::) ::) ::) ::) fire away with these all you want but you actually only have 2 options with Palin.

Believe what she is saying is true that Obama is Hitler reincarnated and he wants to killl just about everyone. The result: You need to take Obama out for humanitary reasons othervise he will commit massmurder.

The second is to acknowledge that she is full of shit.


My option is number 2 whats yours?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: whork25 on January 12, 2011, 07:05:13 AM
Bumping your own gimmick's post. How desperate for attention are you?

Me and Blacken are not the same have one of the admins check our IP if you like?

Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 07:05:57 AM
::) ::) ::) ::) fire away with these all you want but you actually only have 2 options with Palin.

Believe what she is saying is true that Obama is Hitler reincarnated and he wants to killl just about everyone. The result: You need to take Obama out for humanitary reasons othervise he will commit massmurder.

The second is to acknowledge that she is full of shit.


My option is number 2 whats yours?



Yeah, like she is the only one who has ever done this?   Please, your blacken gimmick is a joke.   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 07:06:26 AM
Ron is the only person who can see IPs and he doesn't do IP checks. I think Beach Bum should either ban all your accounts for trolling or force you to post on one.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Benny B on January 12, 2011, 07:12:16 AM
There is no such connection. The shooter worked to get Gifford elected to office and had been talking with her since 2007, before we ever heard of Sarah Palin.

And, there's the little matter of this guy being strung out on dope, with a big fat copy of Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf in his possession and a occultic/Satanic shrine.

But, the left-winged goofballs in the media didn't bother looking hard into that.


It just confirms what I (and others) have long suspected: Not only is the mainstream media in bed with the Obama Administration, it appears their favorite position is "Face-down; @$$-Up".


Here ya' go, Toby.  ;)

Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: whork25 on January 12, 2011, 07:17:07 AM
Ron is the only person who can see IPs and he doesn't do IP checks. I think Beach Bum should either ban all your accounts for trolling or force you to post on one.

First of all im not Blacken so banning his account because you want to ban mine would probably make him sad

Second ban my account for trolling? Have you read the stupid shit you, whorewell and others post?
But i should be banned because you think so? Go fuck yourself bitch
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: kcballer on January 12, 2011, 09:20:18 AM
He also has been infatuated with her since 2007 after teir meeting to wherehe was upset with her answers to his questions.   

Why des KC, Benny, 240, Danny, keep ignoring this?   


I'm not ignoring anything.  I've said there isn't a connection but Palin has allowed one to be drawn by her stupid targets.  It was a dumb move when she did it, and it's backfired badly now. 
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 09:25:42 AM
damn 3333 no posts of palins head photoshoped on Sara Connors body holding a Gage..
what about her lookin down a scope of a fully automatic rifle..
where are the pictures bro?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 09:29:13 AM
damn 3333 no posts of palins head photoshoped on Sara Connors body holding a Gage..
what about her lookin down a scope of a fully automatic rifle..
where are the pictures bro?

Need more bathroom material after the MoSquatch stuff got old?   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 09:37:39 AM
Dont worry.. i got you
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 09:39:40 AM
Picture 1 is just really fucked up.   

Well, I guess its standard fare for the left lately.   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 09:40:49 AM
wow.,.. you say nothing when people wild out on Obamas kids.. thats all good huh
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 09:42:33 AM
wow.,.. you say nothing when people wild out on Obamas kids.. thats all good huh

Where have people done that?   Examples?   and please dont say Billy - he has been gone for months now.  additionally, big difference between disables people and normal kids.   

Well - according tothe left, anything goes, so I see where you are coming from.     

Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 09:45:38 AM
not as fu@ked up as naming your son after a mental condition
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 09:48:05 AM
Where have people done that?   Examples?   and please dont say Billy - he has been gone for months now.  additionally, big difference between disables people and normal kids.   
Well - according tothe left, anything goes, so I see where you are coming from.     

yep our good friend billy would talk about obamas kids and not a peep from you.. and the fact that you say he has been gone for months dosent mean a thing. dont try to rationalize normal vs retarded kids.. they are all kids and all should be left off limits.. but because its right on left bashing its all good right..
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 09:48:24 AM
not as fu@ked up as naming your son after a mental condition


? ? ? ?  ?


Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 09:49:35 AM
yep our good friend billy would talk about obamas kids and not a peep from you.. and the fact that you say he has been gone for months dosent mean a thing. dont try to rationalize normal vs retarded kids.. they are all kids and all should be left off limits.. but because its right on left bashing its all good right..

Kids should be left out, but that did not stop you frm posting that pic now did it?   .   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 09:50:56 AM
Kids should be left out, but that did not stop you frm posting that pic now did it?   .   


i didnt even pay attention actually... i just saw palin with gun. i didnt know that was her son.. i thought her son was a baby.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: kcballer on January 12, 2011, 09:53:03 AM
Kids should be left out, but that did not stop you frm posting that pic now did it?   .   

Haha you can't take the high ground with your low ball standards.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 09:53:13 AM

i didnt even pay attention actually... i just saw palin with gun. i didnt know that was her son.. i thought her son was a baby.

Kid in that pic is corky?   Remember that show with that kid?  

As or Bama's kids, the little one is cute, the older one looks and resembles the father.        
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 09:54:17 AM
Haha you can't take the high ground with your low ball standards.

I have never trashed Bama's kids, yet now mal is making fun of retarded kids.   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 09:55:11 AM
Kid in that pic is corky?   Remember that show with that kid?  

As or Bama's kids, the little one is cute, the older one looks and resembles the father.        

that is fucked up.. i seriously didnt know what that picture was saying outside of her holding a gun.. ill take that shit down. shit aint funny
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 09:56:38 AM
that is fucked up.. i seriously didnt know what that picture was saying outside of her holding a gun.. ill take that shit down. shit aint funny

Third picture is good.   I will use that one again.   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 09:57:58 AM
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:00:05 AM

? ? ? ?  ?






Trig has Down syndrome. Down syndrome (trisomy 21, trisomy G) is a chromosomal disorder resulting in mental retardation and physical abnormalities. Trisomy G, or TriG, for short. Babies born with this disorder are referred to as "trig babies." Palin named her son after his disorder.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:01:26 AM


Trig has Down syndrome. Down syndrome (trisomy 21, trisomy G) is a chromosomal disorder resulting in mental retardation and physical abnormalities. Trisomy G, or TriG, for short. Babies born with this disorder are referred to as "trig babies." Palin named her son after his disorder.


Yeah, that is whacky and strange no doubt.     
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 10:02:34 AM
Yeah, that is whacky and strange no doubt.      

The sad part is that Blacken does nothing but make fun of the child and others with trisomy 21. It's quite despicable but to be expected. 
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:04:41 AM
do you think it's a coincidence  ???
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 10:05:06 AM
Third picture is good.   I will use that one again.   
i actually have that same .45... got it on saturday lol
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:05:35 AM
The sad part is that Blacken does nothing but make fun of the child and others with trisomy 21. It's quite despicable but to be expected. 

Notice how they are avoiding the two threads on the shooter not being political ad having extreme social problems like the plague?    
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 10:06:36 AM
do you think it's a coincidence  ???

A coincidence that kcballer and the other far-lefties never take you to task for making fun of a handicapped child while they chide 333 for the mere mention of Obama's kids? No, not really.

Notice how they are avoiding the two threads on the shooter not being political ad having extreme social problems like the plague?     

Can't expect anything else. They're doing everything they can to push the same agenda the MSM has. It's slowly falling down on them but they're going to go down swinging.  ::)
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 10:07:11 AM
Notice how they are avoiding the two threads on the shooter not being political ad having extreme social problems like the plague?    

who is they?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:08:41 AM
don't you have more i hate muslims shit to post ;D
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 10:09:27 AM
Looks like those stories bother you.

Don't you have to make fun of a handicapped infant some more? Talk about a complete lack of class. Especially when you yourself suffer from a learning disability.  :-\
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:09:33 AM
i actually have that same .45... got it on saturday lol


Get some Hi Cap Mags if you can, while you can.    ;D  ;D
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:10:21 AM
Looks like those stories bother you.

Don't you have to make fun of a handicapped infant some more? Talk about a complete lack of class. Especially when you yourself suffer from a learning disability.  :-\


 ;D
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 10:11:29 AM

 ;D

Don't you too find it ironic that this ritalin sniffer makes fun of others with mental problems?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:14:54 AM
no just making fun of you  ;D
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: kcballer on January 12, 2011, 10:15:47 AM
A coincidence that kcballer and the other far-lefties never take you to task for making fun of a handicapped child while they chide 333 for the mere mention of Obama's kids? No, not really.

Can't expect anything else. They're doing everything they can to push the same agenda the MSM has. It's slowly falling down on them but they're going to go down swinging.  ::)


Funny how you respond to a gimmick loser like blacken.  Why even reply to him?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 10:16:50 AM
Funny how you respond to a gimmick loser like blacken.  Why even reply to him?

Why don't you condemn his using Sarah Palin's child Trig as an insult? He's a far-lefty like you. Is he not giving you a bad name by making fun of the mentally challenged?

Hate on 333 but I've never seen him once use Obama's children in an insult. And here you have "tolerant" Blacken using mental illness and infants in his insults.  :-X
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: 240 is Back on January 12, 2011, 10:18:21 AM
Picture 1 is just really fucked up.   

LOL!  But palin shaking hands with a dead reagan is perfectly unfucked up?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:21:16 AM
your getting behind your usually good for 3 or 4 i hate muslims post a week
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:21:31 AM
LOL!  But palin shaking hands with a dead reagan is perfectly unfucked up?

  
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 10:23:27 AM
your getting behind your usually good for 3 or 4 i hate muslims post a week

Stop trying to change the subject. Do you feel like a big man making fun of a mentally challenged infant? Does it make you feel like a tough guy?

You're pathetic.  :-\
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:24:58 AM
Stop trying to change the subject. Do you feel like a big man making fun of a mentally challenged infant? Does it make you feel like a tough guy?

You're pathetic.  :-\

240 & Blacken seem like kindred spirits lately in trashing young kids.   

I guess this is the talking points from Organizing for America this week?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:25:34 AM
240 & Blacken seem like kindred spirits lately in trashing young kids.   

I guess this is the talking points from Organizing for America this week?

 :D :D just making fun of you
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 10:27:37 AM
240 & Blacken seem like kindred spirits lately in trashing young kids.   

I guess this is the talking points from Organizing for America this week?

It's to be expected. Blacken doesn't possess the intellectual firepower to formulate his opinions or do simple things like fact check MSM claims. 240 is no better.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:30:40 AM
the i hate muslims post are waiting  :D :D
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:31:54 AM
the i hate muslims post are waiting  :D :D


Blacken:

YES OR NO

Has Palin been treated unfairly by the MSM?   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 10:32:54 AM
Again, my posting news stories about atrocities carried out in the name of Islam has nothing to do with this thread or your making fun of a mentally handicapped infant.

So let me ask you once again, do you feel like a big man making fun of that kid? Does it empower you? Do your parents, who are your adult guardians as a result of your own mental deficiencies, know that you're on the internet making fun of handicapped children?  ???
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:34:34 AM
i think most of it she brings upon herself
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:35:16 AM
i think most of it she brings upon herself

Does Obama bring the hate upon himself equally?   If not, why not?   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 10:36:49 AM

Blacken:

YES OR NO

Has Palin been treated unfairly by the MSM?   


FUCK NO..when she blasts Rham and Seth for saying retard but say nothing when Rush and Coultre say it.. she is playing herself.. c'mon.. she plays the game
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:37:14 AM
:D :D just making fun of you

i don't know how to make it any more clear
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Fury on January 12, 2011, 10:40:24 AM
You're a ritalin sniffer who may also be autistic. Why do you attack another person who is mentally challenged like yourself?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:40:36 AM

FUCK NO..when she blasts Rham and Seth for saying retard but say nothing when Rush and Coultre say it.. she is playing herself.. c'mon.. she plays the game

Fine - than SSSTTTFFFUUU when we trash Bama for doing the exact same thing.  
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: blacken700 on January 12, 2011, 10:43:55 AM
You're a ritalin sniffer who may also be autistic. Why do you attack another person who is mentally challenged like yourself?

are you asking why i attack you  :D
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 10:44:36 AM
Fine - than SSSTTTFFFUUU when we trash Bama for doing the exact same thing.  

You trash obama when the sky is gray
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:45:37 AM
You trash obama when the sky is gray

Mal - YES or NO

DOES OBAMA ENGAGE IN THE SAME TYPE OF RHETORIC THAT PALIN DOES?   
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 12, 2011, 10:51:56 AM
Mal - YES or NO

DOES OBAMA ENGAGE IN THE SAME TYPE OF RHETORIC THAT PALIN DOES?   
OMG

THEY ALL DO!!!!!!!!!! But you are under the impression that only one side does
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 12, 2011, 10:54:47 AM
OMG

THEY ALL DO!!!!!!!!!! But you are under the impression that only one side does

No I am not.  I have no problem with it so long as the media STFU about it.   

The MSM and left act innocent in all of this when they do the same shit. 
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: kcballer on January 12, 2011, 11:51:28 AM
Why don't you condemn his using Sarah Palin's child Trig as an insult? He's a far-lefty like you. Is he not giving you a bad name by making fun of the mentally challenged?

Hate on 333 but I've never seen him once use Obama's children in an insult. And here you have "tolerant" Blacken using mental illness and infants in his insults.  :-X

It's a stupid statement and actually replying to him is only giving the statement legs. 
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Jadeveon Clowney on January 12, 2011, 12:03:58 PM
Fine - than SSSTTTFFFUUU when we trash Bama for doing the exact same thing.  

Roll Tide.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: whork25 on January 13, 2011, 01:23:07 AM
No I am not.  I have no problem with it so long as the media STFU about it.   

The MSM and left act innocent in all of this when they do the same shit. 

Im no Obama fan but i have never heard him call Palin for terrrorist, Hitler, creator of death camps etc...
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 13, 2011, 03:07:30 AM
No, he only calls the gop hostage takers, terrorists, and the enemy. 
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: whork25 on January 13, 2011, 03:19:25 AM
No, he only calls the gop hostage takers, terrorists, and the enemy. 

Please show me were he calls the GOP terrorists
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 13, 2011, 03:37:34 AM
Itsimplied with calling people hostage takers.  And let's not forget pelosi as well as holder calling us cowards.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: whork25 on January 13, 2011, 04:06:42 AM
Itsimplied with calling people hostage takers.  And let's not forget pelosi as well as holder calling us cowards.

You said Obama called the GOP terrorists. He did not. So you lied.
You say that he called the GOP hostage takers and thats the same as terrorists. He was referring to the repub blocking any legislation if the tax cuts for the wealty was not continued thereby holding the legislative process hostage. You know this.
There is plenty of ways to critique Obama without resulting to lies. You are actually pretty cool when you critique him on economic policies referring to Peter Schiff etc..
All the lies and fear mongering is only gonna appeal to the neocons on this board like Whorewell and Bezerk etc...
You already have these people in your pocket why not try to get the people who actually have a brain to see things from your point of view instead?
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 13, 2011, 04:17:21 AM
It wasn't a lie, it was a metaphor and I'm not upset about it.

What I get upset about is the feigned outrage.  Its like a hockey player complaining about getting checked into the boards or getting punched.   

I just don't like them acting like this is something new.
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: Option D on January 13, 2011, 06:06:39 AM
You said Obama called the GOP terrorists. He did not. So you lied.
You say that he called the GOP hostage takers and thats the same as terrorists. He was referring to the repub blocking any legislation if the tax cuts for the wealty was not continued thereby holding the legislative process hostage. You know this.
There is plenty of ways to critique Obama without resulting to lies. You are actually pretty cool when you critique him on economic policies referring to Peter Schiff etc..
All the lies and fear mongering is only gonna appeal to the neocons on this board like Whorewell and Bezerk etc...
You already have these people in your pocket why not try to get the people who actually have a brain to see things from your point of view instead?


BOOM BOOM AND MUTHAFUCKIN BOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: More bad news for Sarah Palin
Post by: whork25 on January 14, 2011, 01:59:57 AM
It wasn't a lie, it was a metaphor and I'm not upset about it.

What I get upset about is the feigned outrage.  Its like a hockey player complaining about getting checked into the boards or getting punched.   

I just don't like them acting like this is something new.
Much better. I agree with you on this and it is definetly being used politically by the left.
However Palin being offended that she is being linked to political violence is false outrage to no?
I mean will all the remarks she has said(Obama=terrorist, destroyer of the US, reload your guns, take the country back´etc.) how can she surprised when some nut-job goes to extremes. I mean she does want people to believe what she is saying is true right?