Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nilrem on January 15, 2011, 02:41:39 PM

Title: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Nilrem on January 15, 2011, 02:41:39 PM

It MAY have cost him that much, but I doubt it. His star was very much on the wane by the time he made the run for Governor.  Arnie always has been and always will be a brilliant salesman. Nothing more. He'd be perfect as a carny huckster.  He thought because he could bullshit through bullshit Hollywood that running a state would be the same. It wasn't, and it isn't. God knows how much he's cost California. But my guess is much, much, more than 200 Million.


Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million - Reuters

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Reuters – California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in Long Beach, California, in this October 26, 2010 file photo. …
– Fri Jan 14, 5:06 pm ET

VIENNA (Reuters) – Serving as California governor cost Arnold Schwarzenegger at least $200 million, the bodybuilding star turned actor and politician told a newspaper in his native Austria, insisting 'it was more than worth it."

Counting expenses and lost income from acting in Hollywood films, "in all it is probably more than $200 million," he told Krone when asked how much his two terms in Sacramento had cost. "But I'm not sorry. It was more than worth it," he said.

"What was much worse was the damage my time as governor did to the family. There is a lot there that needs to be repaired," he said, recalling the many Sunday evenings when his wife, Maria, and children broke out in tears at his heavy work schedule.

"We hate your job," Schwarzenegger quoted family members as saying during his early years as governor when he would leave his Los Angeles home every Monday morning for the capital, Sacramento, and not return until the end of the week.

"It was heartbreaking every time," said Schwarzenegger, a Republican who served as governor from 2003 until early this month. "In my second term of office, I did better. I tried to fly home every evening."

(Reporting by Michael Shields; Editing by Peter Cooney)
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Obvious Gimmick on January 15, 2011, 02:57:48 PM
yeah, well, his governership cost me a fuck-ton too!
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Nilrem on January 15, 2011, 03:07:17 PM
But according to Arnie he suffered financially for all Californians.
The fact that he was a legislative failure is neither here nor there.
The man surely has an ego larger than the state.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: maxkane69 on January 15, 2011, 03:18:54 PM
The question is: how much his governorship costed to California? ;)
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: _bruce_ on January 15, 2011, 03:22:51 PM
Hahahaha - Bledsen.
Krone = lowest of the low "newspaper" here in Austria.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Nilrem on January 15, 2011, 03:26:33 PM
It says a lot about the mind set of American voters that they swept in a man famous for what exactly?
Cheesy action movies. You don't just walk into the highest office in California without any prior experience. Maybe Californians finally got that, hence Meg Whitman spunked $180 million dollars and was told to take a run and jump.
I may abhor a man like Reagan, but at least he worked his way up to the Governorship and then the presidency. And THEN he destroyed the States. But at least he payed his dues beforehand.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Marty Champions on January 15, 2011, 03:29:42 PM
IMO over half of getbiggers would vote for johnny Falcon giving him the majority vote
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: slaver on January 15, 2011, 04:05:43 PM
eat a dick
arnold was awesome
one of best movie draws in world
awesome governor
all around american success story
too bad kick ass guy like arnold inspires you to talk shit
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Nilrem on January 15, 2011, 05:32:55 PM
eat a dick
arnold was awesome
one of best movie draws in world
awesome governor
all around american success story
too bad kick ass guy like arnold inspires you to talk shit

Arnold's success was indeed a sign of the times.
Hopefully, the times they are a changin'.

Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: DK II on January 16, 2011, 12:34:40 AM
"counting expenses and lost income from Hollywood movies", that's ridiculous.

He was Governor since 2003, that's 7 full years.

He got 30 Mio $$ for T3, and came out with a new movie every year to every other year, so estimate he could have done 5 movies in that time, and you already have 150 Mio $$.


Who comes up with that bullshit?

Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Nilrem on January 16, 2011, 12:52:06 AM
"Who comes up with that bullshit?"

Arnie maybe?
The man does know how to bullshit.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: freespirit on January 16, 2011, 12:55:20 AM
It says a lot about the mind set of American voters that they swept in a man famous for what exactly?
Cheesy action movies. You don't just walk into the highest office in California without any prior experience. Maybe Californians finally got that, hence Meg Whitman spunked $180 million dollars and was told to take a run and jump.
I may abhor a man like Reagan, but at least he worked his way up to the Governorship and then the presidency. And THEN he destroyed the States. But at least he payed his dues beforehand.


This.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: jesusbod on January 16, 2011, 03:47:44 PM
Poor Arnold. He spent money like a freaking Liberal... Everyone else's money.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: arce1988 on January 16, 2011, 07:57:01 PM
...
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Cara Roerich on January 16, 2011, 08:01:02 PM
Arnold has Parkinson's.  I'm actually surprised this hasn't hit the new sooner.

They tried to silence me before.
Title: Arnie Hit That?
Post by: Formerly_Owner76 on January 17, 2011, 03:47:29 AM
(http://www.joetong.com/wp-content/uploads/classic%20bodybuilding.jpg)
Title: Re: Arnie Hit That?
Post by: Dipadidu on January 17, 2011, 03:54:53 AM
them
Title: Re: Arnie Hit That?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on January 17, 2011, 04:14:55 AM
both lol
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: musclecenter on January 17, 2011, 08:35:24 AM
.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Ron on January 17, 2011, 08:51:48 AM

Not sure if it was that much, but certainly he lost quite a bit of earnings potential (like he needed it).  Still, blaming Arnold on the woes of California is not fair (considering that the Democratic controlled assemblies here just don't get it). 

Now that Jerry Brown is here, and he proposed cutting almost everything that Arnold wanted to, they don't have much a choice - can you imagine the Democrats not backing a Democratic governor. All hell will break loose.

As for Arnold, do not worry about him - he has already started a few business ventures with some key people. Time for him to relax, and we will see him on March 3,4,5 at the Arnold Classic (this time without the 8 CHP officers assigned to him)
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: tom joad on January 17, 2011, 09:00:23 AM
does the $200 million include $$$ he could've earned from endorsing celltech or plazmosis?
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Stavios on January 17, 2011, 09:02:03 AM
He didn't do that for nothing.

I am sure he gained a LOT from it
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 09:04:30 AM
But according to Arnie he suffered financially for all Californians.
The fact that he was a legislative failure is neither here nor there.
The man surely has an ego larger than the state.

  Right. And how could he not be a legislative failure given that the entire Calfornia house of representatives was controlled by Democrats who vetoed everything he tried to do?

  And I agree that this was Arnold's worst move in life. He tried to use the governorship of the Union's largest state as a steppingstone for the presidency, and couldn't make it. He thought that maybe if he saved California from chaos, that Americans would be so wooed that they would change the constitutional ammendment that precludes foreigners from becoming president. Bad move by Arno.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: BayGBM on January 17, 2011, 09:26:37 AM
But according to Arnie he suffered financially for all Californians.
The fact that he was a legislative failure is neither here nor there.
The man surely has an ego larger than the state.

x2.  Look ma... no grey hairs.  ::)

He had some good facelifts though.  :-\
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: _bruce_ on January 17, 2011, 09:28:56 AM
He didn't do that for nothing.

I am sure he gained a LOT from it

+1
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: The_Punisher on January 17, 2011, 09:33:59 AM
Not sure if it was that much, but certainly he lost quite a bit of earnings potential (like he needed it).  Still, blaming Arnold on the woes of California is not fair (considering that the Democratic controlled assemblies here just don't get it). 

Now that Jerry Brown is here, and he proposed cutting almost everything that Arnold wanted to, they don't have much a choice - can you imagine the Democrats not backing a Democratic governor. All hell will break loose.

As for Arnold, do not worry about him - he has already started a few business ventures with some key people. Time for him to relax, and we will see him on March 3,4,5 at the Arnold Classic (this time without the 8 CHP officers assigned to him)

Ron, do you think it will be a good idea to give one or two free ticket for the ASC to Getbiggers who love bodybuilding and would love to go the ASC? ;)...just a thought
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: The Showstoppa on January 17, 2011, 09:36:35 AM
Cali was f'd LONG before Arnie got into office........the chickens have come home to roost in that state.......very sad.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Ron on January 17, 2011, 09:38:33 AM
 Right. And how could he not be a legislative failure given that the entire Calfornia house of representatives was controlled by Democrats who vetoed everything he tried to do?

  And I agree that this was Arnold's worst move in life. He tried to use the governorship of the Union's largest state as a steppingstone for the presidency, and couldn't make it. He thought that maybe if he saved California from chaos, that Americans would be so wooed that they would change the constitutional ammendment that precludes foreigners from becoming president. Bad move by Arno.

SUCKMYMUSCLE


Correct - but didnt realize that the Democrats here in California were more concerned with protecting the status quo, the unions and everything else.  Tough job. 

Quote
Ron, do you think it will be a good idea to give one or two free ticket for the ASC to Getbiggers who love bodybuilding and would love to go the ASC? ...just a thought

I don't have access to ASC tickets - I already have about 10 people who have asked me to get them for them already - as this contest is quite popular, and only seats around 2,800 people, whereas the Olympia seats 8,000+. 
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: spinnis on January 17, 2011, 09:41:08 AM
The first thinh he does after "getting out" is talking about how much potential money hes lost? lol
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 09:48:01 AM

Correct - but didnt realize that the Democrats here in California were more concerned with protecting the status quo, the unions and everything else.  Tough job. 

I don't have access to ASC tickets - I already have about 10 people who have asked me to get them for them already - as this contest is quite popular, and only seats around 2,800 people, whereas the Olympia seats 8,000+. 

  Yeah, I never undertood cronyism and statism frankly. The government does not create money except through inflation. Can't they understand that the programs have to go? The state is completely broke and the only way for it to continue to afford these programs is by either raising taxes or printing money, since no banks are gona lend money to a state that could never pay it back. Raising taxes is very unpopular and unthinkable, especially since raising taxes on the rich and corporations more than they alaready are would simply lead to them leaving the state. And printing money is impossible, since only the federal government, national governments, can print money. California will simply file for brankruptcy in 5 to 10 years and then the federal government will have to bail it out or the California government will not be able to pay the salaries of state civil servants.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: BayGBM on January 17, 2011, 09:51:30 AM
The first thinh he does after "getting out" is talking about how much potential money hes lost? lol

Yes.  Because that is the comment of someone who has failed.  If CA were soaring he (nor his handlers) would be talking about how much money he lost/sacrificed to be governor.  By almost every measure his time in office has been judged a failure.  Brown is already doing things Arnold failed to do and Arnold is looking very bad by comparison.  Hence the defensive posturing about how much he theoretically "lost" by taking on being governor.  

Note, by the way, that Arnold never lived in Sacramento.  He flew back and forth while his family stayed in Southern CA.  In other words, this was never a job he took seriously. It was a flight of fancy for a bored, rich person and now that it's over he is going back to his mansion.  ::)
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 10:02:04 AM
Yes.  Because that is the comment of someone who has failed.  If CA were soaring he (nor his handlers) would be talking about how much money he lost/sacrificed to be governor.  By almost every measure his time in office has been judged a failure.  Brown is already doing things Arnold failed to do and Arnold is looking very bad by comparison.  Hence the defensive posturing about how much he theoretically "lost" by taking on being governor.  


  What a terrible comparison. Brown is a democrat. The California's house of representatives is controlled by Democrats. Obviously, Brown can get things done more because the legislature is willing to work with him whilst it wasn't willing to work with Arnold the Republican he-man. Simple as that.

Quote
Note, by the way, that Arnold never lived in Sacramento.  He flew back and forth while his family stayed in Southern CA.  In other words, this was never a job he took seriously. It was a flight of fancy for a bored, rich person and now that it's over he is going back to his mansion.

  He actually did live in Sacramento during his first term. By the second term he was flying home every day because he has a family and he wanted to see his kids who couldn't live in Sacramento because their lives were in L.A. He did the best he could to reconcil work with his family life. Nothing wrong with that.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Ron on January 17, 2011, 10:07:29 AM


  What a terrible comparison. Brown is a democrat. The California's house of representatives is controlled by Democrats. Obviously, Brown can get things done more because the legislature is willing to work with him whilst it wasn't willing to work with Arnold the Republican he-man. Simple as that.

  He actually did live in Sacramento during his first term. By the second term he was flying home every day because he has a family and he wanted to see his kids who couldn't live in Sacramento because their lives were in L.A. He did the best he could to reconcil work with his family life. Nothing wrong with that.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Californias Legislative Reps knew that if they helped Arnold, it wouldnt bode well for the Democrats. Now that Brown is in office, they can make the painful cuts that they wouldnt do before.  Taxes are way high here in California already.

As for Arnold, yes, Sacramento was his second home where he worked tireless to make California better.  With 4 kids, you do not want to uproot them from friends, family and more.  Family comes first. I don't blame him for that. I know a number of people that work Mon-Thursday on the road, traveling in the hopes of making it easier for their family.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: BayGBM on January 17, 2011, 10:13:33 AM


  What a terrible comparison. Brown is a democrat. The California's house of representatives is controlled by Democrats. Obviously, Brown can get things done more because the legislature is willing to work with him whilst it wasn't willing to work with Arnold the Republican he-man. Simple as that.

  He actually did live in Sacramento during his first term. By the second term he was flying home every day because he has a family and he wanted to see his kids who couldn't live in Sacramento because their lives were in L.A. He did the best he could to reconcil work with his family life. Nothing wrong with that.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Your apologia needs work.  “I can’t be effective because the legislature is controlled by Democrats” is certainly not the tune Arnold was singing when he was running for office nor when he was taking his agenda directly to voters (who overwhelmingly rejected his overtures).  Like many rich, bored people who run for office, he thought he could run and govern based on his personality.  The fact that he didn’t have a deep knowledge—no knowledge in fact--of how Sacramento really works (and doesn’t work) set him up for failure.  He had no clue how to dance among the politicos and policy advocates that make things happen.  All of which = ineffective girly man. ::)
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: HTexan on January 17, 2011, 10:17:28 AM
Haha. No it cost the kenndy's fundraisers/ givers 200 million.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: BayGBM on January 17, 2011, 10:30:12 AM
Californias Legislative Reps knew that if they helped Arnold, it wouldnt bode well for the Democrats. Now that Brown is in office, they can make the painful cuts that they wouldnt do before.  Taxes are way high here in California already.

As for Arnold, yes, Sacramento was his second home where he worked tireless to make California better.  With 4 kids, you do not want to uproot them from friends, family and more.  Family comes first. I don't blame him for that. I know a number of people that work Mon-Thursday on the road, traveling in the hopes of making it easier for their family.

Your apologia needs work as well.  Likening Arnold to a traveling salesman trying to support his family is laughable.  When one runs for an office like governor or president voters expect you to put the office first and that is why office seekers usually have a family meeting to discuss and decide if the family is on board with seeking the office.  In effect, it is a family undertaking.  Virtually every governor in every state uproots their family and moves to the state capital because they know what is required and they are serious but the work.

“Family first” is a nice PC phrase, but that card is one usually played by single moms of modest means--not male executives who have wives, maids, nannies, cooks, and lots of other help to look after the family.  If being near his family was so important and they were unwilling or unable to be in Sacramento then he/they should have thought about that before running for office.  The job of Governor of California requires heavy lifting; early mornings, late nights, cultivating support with friends and foes, etc.; you can’t just phone it in.  Arnold never got that.

We faced the prospect of more of the same with Meg Whitman.  Voters got it . . . and said “no thanks.”
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: hench on January 17, 2011, 11:56:57 AM
exactly, he was merely just the messenger in the end. He would have loved to turn the situation around being a man who thrives on love and praise. If there really was another way things could have been done he would have. If someone else had been in charge things would have gone more or less the same. The money simply isn't there to pull it back....
Cali was f'd LONG before Arnie got into office........the chickens have come home to roost in that state.......very sad.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on January 17, 2011, 12:02:54 PM
the logical next step for him is to become the dictator of a 3rd world nation somewhere
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 12:10:34 PM
Your apologia needs work.  “I can’t be effective because the legislature is controlled by Democrats” is certainly not the tune Arnold was singing when he was running for office nor when he was taking his agenda directly to voters (who overwhelmingly rejected his overtures).  Like many rich, bored people who run for office, he thought he could run and govern based on his personality.  The fact that he didn’t have a deep knowledge—no knowledge in fact--of how Sacramento really works (and doesn’t work) set him up for failure.  He had no clue how to dance among the politicos and policy advocates that make things happen.  All of which = ineffective girly man.

  Bay, Arnold was not the king of California. He couldn't just make decrees and have all of them become law at penalty of death for those who disobeyed it. He was head of the executive, but the chief executive's powers are restrained and determined by the legislature, which creates the laws by which the chief executive exercises his powers. There was nothing Arnold could do since 90% of state legislators were Democrats who harbored an extreme hatred for Arnold because he represents everything that is despicable about the Republican Party(rich and powerful macho men who don't care about the poor smoking Cuban cigars).

  Yes, Arnold claiming that he could work against the Democratic legislature by taking matters directly to the people was very foolish and finished him. There is only so much that you can accomplish by public referendums and in the democratic process laws are created by the legislature - that is why there even is a public legislature at all. Public referendums are a last resort for very serious things. Using it constantly for approving and canceling laws is impossible.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: BayGBM on January 17, 2011, 12:25:47 PM
 Bay, Arnold was not the king of California. He couldn't just make decrees and have all of them become law at penalty of death for those who disobeyed it. He was head of the executive, but the chief executive's powers are restrained and determined by the legislature, which creates the laws by which the chief executive exercises his powers. There was nothing Arnold could do since 90% of state legislators were Democrats who harbored an extreme hatred for Arnold because he represents everything that is despicable about the Republican Party(rich and powerful macho men who don't care about the poor smoking Cuban cigars).

  Yes, Arnold claiming that he could work against the Democratic legislature by taking matters directly to the people was very foolish and finished him. There is only so much that you can accomplish by public referendums and in the democratic process laws are created by the legislature - that is why there even is a public legislature at all. Public referendums are a last resort for very serious things. Using it constantly for approving and canceling laws is impossible.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

The trouble is Arnold didn't realize this... until it was too late.  But no harm done, right?  He's gone back to the good life and left California burning.  ::)
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 12:53:29 PM
The trouble is Arnold didn't realize this... until it was too late.  But no harm done, right?  He's gone back to the good life and left California burning.

  Bay, Arnold loves the atention and he wants to be president badly. He believed that he could bend the Democratic legislature by rising the masses against them, but he failed to realize that the mostly Latino Californians do not support government spending cuts. He failed to realize that the people were supporting the legislature and only elected him because he is a movie star. The California people believed that Arnold would be this superman that could somehow solve the California debt crises without cutting out the goodies and of course Arnold couldn't do both things since it's impossible.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: BayGBM on January 17, 2011, 06:55:34 PM
  Bay, Arnold loves the atention and he wants to be president badly. He believed that he could bend the Democratic legislature by rising the masses against them, but he failed to realize that the mostly Latino Californians do not support government spending cuts. He failed to realize that the people were supporting the legislature and only elected him because he is a movie star. The California people believed that Arnold would be this superman that could somehow solve the California debt crises without cutting out the goodies and of course Arnold couldn't do both things since it's impossible.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

When all is said and done, it appears you and I agree.  He failed.  ::)

Fortunately for his family, they never had to "suffer" the dislocation of moving to and from Sacramento.  Arnold effectively commuted back and forth.  His hobby/experiment is now over and it is back to LALA land for him.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 07:04:29 PM
When all is said and done, it appears you and I agree.  He failed.  ::)

Fortunately for his family, they never had to "suffer" the dislocation of moving to and from Sacramento.  Arnold effectively commuted back and forth.  His hobby/experiment is now over and it is back to LALA land for him.

  Where we differ is that you make it seem like there was something that he could do about it and that if he were more competent he would have found a way, when in reality it was inevitable and there was nothing he could do.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Nilrem on January 18, 2011, 02:33:16 PM
  Where we differ is that you make it seem like there was something that he could do about it and that if he were more competent he would have found a way, when in reality it was inevitable and there was nothing he could do.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Rubbish. Arnold wasn't good enough. Ron and yourself are nothing more than Arnold apologists. The man FAILED. And it was an epic fail.
Arnold is nothing more than an opportunist. He could get away with being a charlatan in the world of bodybuilding and movies, because lets face it, both are built on lies and deceptions. But when it came to trying to achieve, to really achieve, Mr Alpha came up Beta.
Did Bill Clinton not work with a Republican controlled assembly? Did he not make it work? You wanna know why he did? Because he put in the time and worked at becoming a legislator and the legislative process. Did Arnold bother to really understand the machinations of politics? Ha! But he did set up a cigar smoking tent, there's an achievement.

California is a great state and the people within are no dummies. When Whitman came along telling us that just because she's rich and successful (just like Arnold) she could run the state, the people voted accordingly.


Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 18, 2011, 03:05:56 PM
Rubbish. Arnold wasn't good enough. Ron and yourself are nothing more than Arnold apologists. The man FAILED. And it was an epic fail.
Arnold is nothing more than an opportunist. He could get away with being a charlatan in the world of bodybuilding and movies, because lets face it, both are built on lies and deceptions. But when it came to trying to achieve, to really achieve, Mr Alpha came up Beta.
Did Bill Clinton not work with a Republican controlled assembly? Did he not make it work? You wanna know why he did? Because he put in the time and worked at becoming a legislator and the legislative process. Did Arnold bother to really understand the machinations of politics? Ha! But he did set up a cigar smoking tent, there's an achievement.


  The Democratic legislature was not willing to work with Arnold at all. They declared war on him from day one. Even Grey Davis told Arnold "good luck. You won't get anything done." when Arnold won the race. Arnold is not merely a Republican, but the kind of Republican that Democrats hate: the rich manly man who doesen't care about the poor and smokes Cuban cigars. You make it seem like Arnold should have been a miracle worker, because no one without super-human powers could fix the state having the 90% Democrat legislature vetoeing everything he did.

Quote
California is a great state and the people within are no dummies. When Whitman came along telling us that just because she's rich and successful (just like Arnold) she could run the state, the people voted accordingly.

  California is beyond broke and will have to be bailed out by the federal government in 5-10 years. It's public deficit is 100% of it's GDP and it's economy has shrunk significantly over the last 15 years due to the huge taxes and increase in crime which makes corporations and rich people leave. Even having the highest taxes in the nation the state of California spends so much that it is still broke anyway.

SUCKMYMUSCLE


Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Nilrem on January 18, 2011, 04:34:44 PM


  The Democratic legislature was not willing to work with Arnold at all. They declared war on him from day one. Even Grey Davis told Arnold "good luck. You won't get anything done." when Arnold won the race. Arnold is not merely a Republican, but the kind of Republican that Democrats hate: the rich manly man who doesen't care about the poor and smokes Cuban cigars. You make it seem like Arnold should have been a miracle worker, because no one without super-human powers could fix the state having the 90% Democrat legislature vetoeing everything he did.

  California is beyond broke and will have to be bailed out by the federal government in 5-10 years. It's public deficit is 100% of it's GDP and it's economy has shrunk significantly over the last 15 years due to the huge taxes and increase in crime which makes corporations and rich people leave. Even having the highest taxes in the nation the state of California spends so much that it is still broke anyway.

SUCKMYMUSCLE




Arnold said he was going to ride into town and fix it all, no? He didn't.
Arnold said he could do a better job than Grey Davis. He didn't.
All I'm doing is calling him out on this.
You, again, are apologizing for him. You shouldn't.

A lot of California's debt has to do with the goosing of power prices back in the day, or have you forgotten that?
CA had to borrow lots of money to pay rich crooks in Texas. What did Arnie do to alleviate this? Nothing, borrow more.
A small car tax would have done the trick but, he thought otherwise. Now Californians are stuck paying lots of interest on loans they never should have taken out.
Also, the MASSIVE housing bubble wouldn't have anything to do with the state of California would it? The same bubble that free market booster Alan Greenspan sat back and did fuck all about.

Please, Suckyourmuscle. Get it together.
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Pollux on January 18, 2011, 05:57:58 PM
 8)

Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: BayGBM on January 18, 2011, 07:26:36 PM
Rubbish. Arnold wasn't good enough. Ron and yourself are nothing more than Arnold apologists. The man FAILED. And it was an epic fail.
Arnold is nothing more than an opportunist. He could get away with being a charlatan in the world of bodybuilding and movies, because lets face it, both are built on lies and deceptions. But when it came to trying to achieve, to really achieve, Mr Alpha came up Beta.
Did Bill Clinton not work with a Republican controlled assembly? Did he not make it work? You wanna know why he did? Because he put in the time and worked at becoming a legislator and the legislative process. Did Arnold bother to really understand the machinations of politics? Ha! But he did set up a cigar smoking tent, there's an achievement.

California is a great state and the people within are no dummies. When Whitman came along telling us that just because she's rich and successful (just like Arnold) she could run the state, the people voted accordingly.





Exactly!  In looking back at Arnold’s (failed) time in office we have two possible interpretations:

• the job was literally impossible and no human being anywhere could have been successful in the same situation.

• Arnold was in over his head.

Now, which one seems more likely?  ::) The fan boys can’t imagine their hero being inadequate so they rabidly cling to the former scenario.  Many executives find themselves facing off with a legislature of the opposite party and still manage to be effective.  Not Arnold.  As you said: epic fail!
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: tbombz on January 18, 2011, 08:13:23 PM
Still, blaming Arnold on the woes of California is not fair (considering that the Democratic controlled assemblies here just don't get it). 
::)
Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: Nilrem on January 18, 2011, 08:32:04 PM

Exactly!  In looking back at Arnold’s (failed) time in office we have two possible interpretations:

• the job was literally impossible and no human being anywhere could have been successful in the same situation.

• Arnold was in over his head.


Arnold WAS in over his head. And who was to blame for that? Well, I'd start with Arnold and his humongous ego.
Arnold is/was a great bodybuilder with above average genetics, he was also a pretty lousy actor and a political neophyte. Sadly his legislative ineptitude has meant that the new governor will have to work twice as hard to make up ground, and in all probability, will get a fraction of the acclaim Arnold would have gotten had been able to pull anything off.

Arnold has one defining trait. He's a brilliant self promoter. If he loves California as much as he purports to, he should have pitched for a job as the state's ambassador.
To quote another well known republican; "A man has to know his limitations".

Title: Re: Schwarzenegger says governorship cost him $200 million
Post by: sean on January 18, 2011, 08:52:18 PM
To solve the problems of California, they must be willing to:

1. Legalize the growth and sale pot and free up those incarerated for offenses related. (double saver there)
2. Guard that fu*king boarder like east/west germany.
3. Dont allow business to exploit the mass of cheap and even sometime, free labor  and start employing citizens of the state.
4. Loosen up GIGANTICALLY on ag laws so that more can be done here and bring some farmers back
5. Move away from "prison state" status currently in
6. Chisle down on those exploiting social aide by more oversight on those that are abusing the system.
7. Work on reforming the 3rd stike laws. Lock em up and throw away is costing shitloads.

THis is a nice one.