Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: gh15 on January 15, 2011, 11:19:51 PM

Title: pm question anwered
Post by: gh15 on January 15, 2011, 11:19:51 PM
god

please explain in your opinion best time during contest prep to run dnp.

at beginning of prep when bodyfat is high?

or at end when bodyfat is low, and dnp takes off that last hard to reach fat so glutes can come in?

please let me know your opinion.

thanks for your time

we not use dnp,,no serioud bodybuilder use it,,bodybuidler always use hgh all year long,,never off ,,gh lean bodybuilder,, and grow bodybuilder,, teroids with it must or full mutation as writeen 100 time in bible

gh15 approved
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Lundgren on January 15, 2011, 11:23:06 PM
we not use dnp,,no serioud bodybuilder use it,,bodybuidler always use hgh all year long,,never off ,,gh lean bodybuilder,, and grow bodybuilder,, teroids with it must or full mutation as writeen 100 time in bible

gh15 approved
Is there really a need after all these years to say gh15 approved we know you approve you just started a thread dedicated to such diatribe.


Lundgrenisgod Dissapproves.
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: gh15 on January 15, 2011, 11:26:50 PM
unlike milshko approved,,and liar priest approved,,and rest of the pieces of shits around approved,,that dont even know what talk about and lie on regular basis inordr to make a dollar,,, when gh15 mark somethign as gh15 approved its 100% true no if no but no argues,,

gh15 approved
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Lundgren on January 15, 2011, 11:29:57 PM
unlike milshko approved,,and liar priest approved,,and rest of the pieces of shits around approved,,that dont even know what talk about and lie on regular basis inordr to make a dollar,,, when gh15 mark somethign as gh15 approved its 100% true no if no but no argues,,

gh15 approved
Lol don't take me seriously. My Dad's Stepbrother's  wife, just tried to set me up with her sisters daughter.  My life can't get much lower. :)
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: epic_alien on January 16, 2011, 12:38:41 AM
gh-15

i understand gh would be superior to ay other medication, but i do not use gh nor will i during my prep. but dnp seems to be a good product forgetting at the last amounts of fat i cannot get do by dieting alone.

can it be used, and what results have you seen from it?
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: GWAR on January 16, 2011, 12:41:14 AM
hgh is a carcinogen , hope that helps
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: epic_alien on January 16, 2011, 01:36:04 AM
hgh is a carcinogen , hope that helps

no, it does not
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: pellius on January 16, 2011, 01:39:41 AM
no, it does not

STFU dickhead! Just load up on DNP like a good little bitch that doesn't have the discipline to diet.
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: epic_alien on January 16, 2011, 07:15:11 PM
dicipline has nothing to do with it, you shriveled up elephant skin you weigh what? 180lbs? what would you know about bodybuildig or dieting? you have been a skinny elephant man your whole life, and had to do gear to get to 180.

so dude, do not follow me around.
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Spike on January 17, 2011, 08:03:11 AM
Ive been to nationals twice, states ovr 4 times and on stage since I was 17 - done hella shows


I HAVE NEVER USED DNP EVER

get some clen, t3, a diet, and a treadmill

DNP is for dynamite
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: claymore on January 17, 2011, 08:46:40 AM
Ive been to nationals twice, states ovr 4 times and on stage since I was 17 - done hella shows


I HAVE NEVER USED DNP EVER

get some clen, t3, a diet, and a treadmill

DNP is for dynamite

Agreed, DNP is not needed
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Stavios on January 17, 2011, 08:58:10 AM
Ive been to nationals twice, states ovr 4 times and on stage since I was 17 - done hella shows


I HAVE NEVER USED DNP EVER

get some clen, t3, a diet, and a treadmill

DNP is for dynamite

some friends of mine looked fucking GREAT using DNP

I can't tolerate it even at low dose tho
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: g101 on January 17, 2011, 11:43:19 AM
fuck DNP, might aswell inhale RAID or whatever that shits called for ants


try ephedrine+clen+t3+gh+tren then come back to me

ps. all stacked together :D
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: newmom on January 17, 2011, 11:45:50 AM
ps. all stacked together :D

 :o :o :o :o
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 11:47:12 AM
  GH is the most overrated bodybuilding drug ever. It works for fat loss, but it adds very little muscle mass. China even gave up using GH on it's athletes because they gained so little in strength and power and so much in internal organ and bone growth. Steroids are much better. Insulin is also grossly overrated. IGF-1(somatostatin C) is a different story, but very expensive and also hard to get.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: no one on January 17, 2011, 11:48:13 AM

i've used it. 3 different times.

my advise to you- forget about it and plan your prep to diet longer instead. and use GH next time.

Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: no one on January 17, 2011, 11:50:56 AM
 GH is the most overrated bodybuilding drug ever. It works for fat loss, but it adds very little muscle mass. China even gave up using GH on it's athletes because they gained do little in strength and power and so much in internal organ and bone growth. Steroids are much better. Insulin is also grossly overrated. IGF-1(somatostatin C) is a different story, but very expensive and also hard to get.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

only half accurate. gh is the most valuable component in any kind of serious bodbuilders arsenal. its the synergy when combined with the rest of your compounds that makes it the best fucking thing you'll ever spend a dollar on.

but anyone who trains is prolly going to be running anabolics if they are taking GH so your post is kinda useless.

thanks for contributing though.
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 12:17:44 PM
only half accurate. gh is the most valuable component in any kind of serious bodbuilders arsenal. its the synergy when combined with the rest of your compounds that makes it the best fucking thing you'll ever spend a dollar on.

but anyone who trains is prolly going to be running anabolics if they are taking GH so your post is kinda useless.

thanks for contributing though.

  Yeah, I've read that GH works vastly improved if you combine it with steroids. Unfortunately there is no evidence for it. The Chinese government spend billions of Dollars researching anablic pharmacodynamics as it applies to Human sports enhancement and they came to the conclusion that adding GH to a steroid stack added very little benefits at a vastly increased cost(acromegalia and diabetes) to the athlete and dropped GH in the stacks for their athletes. They know more than we do, because they have thousands of laboratores doing research on this with lots of PhDs and billions of Dollars and they came to this conclusion.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Emmortal on January 17, 2011, 12:20:36 PM
  Yeah, I've read that GH works vastly improved if you combine it with steroids. Unfortunately there is no evidence for it. The Chinese government spend billions of Dollars researching anablic pharmacodynamics as it applies to Human sports enhancement and they came to the conclusion that adding GH to a steroid stack added very little benefits at a vastly increased cost(acromegalia and diabetes) to the athlete and dropped GH in the stacks for their athletes. They know more than we do, because they have thousands of laboratores doing research on this with lots of PhDs and billions of Dollars and they came to this conclusion.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Link?
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Master Blaster on January 17, 2011, 12:21:59 PM
  Yeah, I've read that GH works vastly improved if you combine it with steroids. Unfortunately there is no evidence for it. The Chinese government spend billions of Dollars researching anablic pharmacodynamics as it applies to Human sports enhancement and they came to the conclusion that adding GH to a steroid stack added very little benefits at a vastly increased cost(acromegalia and diabetes) to the athlete and dropped GH in the stacks for their athletes. They know more than we do, because they have thousands of laboratores doing research on this with lots of PhDs and billions of Dollars and they came to this conclusion.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

No chinese einstien with a Phd ever got as huge and ripped as a dumb bodybuilder.

Hope that helps.
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: no one on January 17, 2011, 12:22:37 PM
  Yeah, I've read that GH works vastly improved if you combine it with steroids. Unfortunately there is no evidence for it. The Chinese government spend billions of Dollars researching anablic pharmacodynamics as it applies to Human sports enhancement and they came to the conclusion that adding GH to a steroid stack added very little benefits at a vastly increased cost(acromegalia and diabetes) to the athlete and dropped GH in the stacks for their athletes. They know more than we do, because they have thousands of laboratores doing research on this with lots of PhDs and billions of Dollars and they came to this conclusion.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

you need to look more at what is going on around you at gyms across the country, and less at studies.
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 12:26:50 PM
No chinese einstien with a Phd ever got as huge and ripped as a dumb bodybuilder.

Hope that helps.

  This is a redundant argument, since no Chinese PhD ever tried to become as big as a pro bodybuilder. Doesen't mean that the bodybuilder knows more pharmacololgy than the PhD. Then, there are other factors like genetic potential for mass. Even knowing more about what is the optimum drugs for growth, the PhD might never become as big as the pro due to genetics.

  And a gorilla is much stronger and bigger than a Human physiologist, but this doesen't mean the gorilla knows more about why it is so big and strong than the Human does. Go ask the gorilla why it is so big and strong and you will get no answer. So your analogy is stupid.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Master Blaster on January 17, 2011, 12:31:06 PM
 
  And a gorilla is much stronger and bigger than a Human physiologist, but this doesen't mean the gorilla knows more about why it is so big and strong than the Human does. Go ask the gorilla why it is so big and strong and you will get no answer. So your analogy is stupid.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hahahah, go damn, you are one dumb little shit
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 12:33:34 PM
Hahahah, go damn, you are one dumb little shit

  What is wrong with that? You did make a stupid analogy.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: no one on January 17, 2011, 12:33:49 PM
 If you take the amounts of anabolic that pros take, you'll get huge no matter what. It doesen't mean that the GH is adding anything to the bodybuilder's size. Maybe he would be just as big with the sauce but no GH.

  And a gorilla is much stronger and bigger than a Human physiologist, but this doesen't mean the gorilla knows more about why it is so big and strong than the Human does. Go ask the gorilla why it is so big and strong and you will get no answer. So your analogy is stupid.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

no, your stance on the subject you are trying to debate is stupid.

im not debating this with you any further as you clearly have no idea what you are talking about, or are just trolling.

come back when you can add some kind of real world application and experience to the topic at hand, studyboy.



Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 12:35:49 PM
no, your ignorance of the subject you are trying to debate is stupid.

im not debating this with you any further as you clearly have no idea what you are talking about, or are just trolling.

come back when you can add some kind of real world application and experience to the topic at hand, studyboy.





   Translation:

  "I got owned by trying to debate someone smarter and figured out I can never win a debate with him, so I will just make a final insult at him to save face and leave the thread in shame."

  Thanks for playing. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 12:37:25 PM
Hahahah, go damn, you are one dumb little shit

  I shall kill myself. I have been made fun of by the guy who believes that tendons make you stronger. :-X

  Also, Master Blaster, you have already said in the past that I am a smart guy, so you calling me stupid now carries no weight. ;) When have I complimented you for your smarts? Never. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Master Blaster on January 17, 2011, 12:44:48 PM
 I shall kill myself. I have been made fun of by the guy who believes that tendons make you stronger. :-X

  Also, Master Blaster, you have already said in the past that I am a smart guy, so you calling me stupid now carries no weight. ;) When have I complimented you for your smarts? Never. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Yes we've had some fun times, no doubt.

Seriously though, Its kind of sad that I have to point this out. Nobody thinks tendons make you stronger, we were just trying to whip you up to a frenzy.  ;)
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 12:48:58 PM
Yes we've had some fun times, no doubt.

Seriously though, Its kind of sad that I have to point this out. Nobody thinks tendons make you stronger, we were just trying to whip you up to a frenzy.  ;)

  I played along because I enjoy showing everyone how smart and knowledeable I am. So thank you! :D :D :D

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: benchmstr on January 17, 2011, 12:53:02 PM
Every single current pro uses it...hope this helps..

Bench
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: pellius on January 17, 2011, 01:11:42 PM
The genius suckymuscle continues to consistently bring the stupid to every thread he posts on.

Does anybody here take this guy seriously?
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: epic_alien on January 17, 2011, 01:56:47 PM
my goal with dnp is not to take shortcut in the diet. its to use to get glutes to come in a already shredded physique. my prep is long and the usual's clen, ephed,, t-3 those are all standards and will be used. used them many times.

no one has any success with dnp here? in achieving not a quick fix, but the ultimate best condition for contest
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: no one on January 17, 2011, 03:04:58 PM
  Translation:

  "I got owned by trying to debate someone smarter and figured out I can never win a debate with him, so I will just make a final insult at him to save face and leave the thread in shame."

  Thanks for playing. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

dude, why debate you? you post up claims of studies saying GH doesnt work, but yet you yourself have never tried it in conjunction with anabolics. so, really, all your doing is talking out your ass. you have no real world experience regarding the application of this compound to draw from. therefore really, you have no clue what it is you are talking about- do you understand that?

1000's if not 10's of 000s of bodybuilders who have used this compound, myself included, know that it doesnt just work, it transforms your physique. you can use all the anabolics you want, throw GH into the mix and its another level- completely another level.

those who use it get it. those who don't wont understand.

so, you keep on reading, champ. im about to pop 2iu and go train.
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 17, 2011, 04:36:54 PM
The genius suckymuscle continues to consistently bring the stupid to every thread he posts on.

Does anybody here take this guy seriously?

  Now this is a blanket statement if there ever was one.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: epic_alien on January 18, 2011, 01:54:10 AM
Every single current pro uses it...hope this helps..

Bench

is this so?
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: pellius on January 18, 2011, 03:00:48 AM
my goal with dnp is not to take shortcut in the diet. its to use to get glutes to come in a already shredded physique. my prep is long and the usual's clen, ephed,, t-3 those are all standards and will be used. used them many times.

no one has any success with dnp here? in achieving not a quick fix, but the ultimate best condition for contest

Oh brother. Can you be any more of a flaming phaggot?! First posting a pic of yourself sporting a fake plastic cock stuffed into your thong and now this. If you want to firm up your ass stop allowing it to be jack-hammered and pounded repeatedly by packs of howling kneegars.

You are such a dick. 
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: benchmstr on January 18, 2011, 09:38:28 AM
is this so?
yes....not only is it a fat burner....its diet insurance....cause if you start getting off your diet, and eat to many carbs, or sugar...it will fuck you up...it keeps you on your diet out of fear for your life...

try eating cookies or doughnuts on DNP....funny as hell ;D

bench
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: epic_alien on January 18, 2011, 03:22:36 PM
Oh brother. Can you be any more of a flaming phaggot?! First posting a pic of yourself sporting a fake plastic cock stuffed into your thong and now this. If you want to firm up your ass stop allowing it to be jack-hammered and pounded repeatedly by packs of howling kneegars.

You are such a dick.  


dude so tell us, is there a store where this fake plastic cock can be purchased? since its your bread and butter go to insult you have with me id assume you have knowledge of such a thing. you have said it numerous times. you sound so fucking stupid every time tou even say something like that, it shows you have nothing to really insult me about. so you go to your plastic cock routine.

arent you like 60 years old?
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Master Blaster on January 18, 2011, 04:41:48 PM

dude so tell us, is there a store where this fake plastic cock can be purchased? since its your bread and butter go to insult you have with me id assume you have knowledge of such a thing. you have said it numerous times. you sound so fucking stupid every time tou even say something like that, it shows you have nothing to really insult me about. so you go to your plastic cock routine.

arent you like 60 years old?

your mom is a fake plastic cock
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: pellius on January 18, 2011, 04:51:18 PM

dude so tell us, is there a store where this fake plastic cock can be purchased? since its your bread and butter go to insult you have with me id assume you have knowledge of such a thing. you have said it numerous times. you sound so fucking stupid every time tou even say something like that, it shows you have nothing to really insult me about. so you go to your plastic cock routine.

arent you like 60 years old?

You tell me. It was pointed out in that thread you started where you got brutally owned trying to bag on a genuinely good and funny poster, JNN. Epic_Alien? Try Epic_Insecurity.

Asshole!


Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: pellius on January 18, 2011, 04:53:31 PM
your mom is a fake plastic cock

LOL! This phaggot is fast becoming the latest GetBig whipping boy.

"to get glutes to come in a already shredded physique"

Oh brother. Such an unabashed dickhead.
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: DK II on January 18, 2011, 06:09:33 PM
epic_failien

Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Heavy_Hitter on January 18, 2011, 10:56:38 PM
Every single current pro uses it...hope this helps..

Bench


 DNP? Not true! GH? Probably yes!
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 05:13:43 AM

 DNP? Not true! GH? Probably yes!

Seriously, I bet 95 percent do
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Spike on January 19, 2011, 06:37:36 AM
Seriously, I bet 95 percent do

why say? you dippn in the DNP there young lady??
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 06:38:40 AM
why say? you dippn in the DNP there young lady??

I'm not a pro bber junior
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Spike on January 19, 2011, 06:42:03 AM
I'm not a pro bber junior

well DNP is about the only shit I know if you take too much you die

I'd rather take gh and smoke trees and die from a heart attack then overheat and feel my insides melt on DNP

bout to say -- if you wanna take it to the next level - hit up some EPO for the 26.2 ;D ;D
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 06:44:20 AM
well DNP is about the only shit I know if you take too much you die

I'd rather take gh and smoke trees and die from a heart attack then overheat and feel my insides melt on DNP

bout to say -- if you wanna take it to the next level - hit up some EPO for the 26.2 ;D ;D

the hell is epo...??

The only thing I ever took before and during a big run is goo gel
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Spike on January 19, 2011, 06:53:28 AM
the hell is epo...??

The only thing I ever took before and during a big run is goo gel

increases red blood cell production increases your endurance and cellular energy production

Quote
EPO has a history of usage as a blood doping agent in endurance sports such as cycling, rowing, distance running, race walking, cross country skiing, biathlon, and triathlons.

Though EPO was believed to be widely used in the 1990s in certain sports, there was no way to directly test for it until in 2000 when a test developed by scientists at the French national anti-doping laboratory (LNDD) and endorsed by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) was introduced to detect pharmaceutical EPO by distinguishing it from the nearly-identical natural hormone normally present in an athlete’s urine.

In 2002, at the Winter Olympic Games in Salt Lake City, Don Catlin, MD, the founder and then-director of the UCLA Olympic Analytical Lab, reported darbepoetin alfa, a form of erythropoietin, for the first time in sports.

In 2010, Floyd Landis admitted using performance-enhancing drugs, including EPO, throughout the majority of his career as a professional rider.

Since 2002, EPO tests done by U.S. sports authorities have consisted of only a urine or “direct” test. From 2000–2006, EPO tests at the Olympics were conducted on both blood and urine
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 06:55:29 AM
I'm good thanks ;D
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Spike on January 19, 2011, 06:57:41 AM
I'm good thanks ;D

Im not encouraging usage of PEDs for any reason BUT maybe the chic who gets first should be tested if she has like a wicked time or something

this stuff is easy to get (for some) -- youd be surprised at number of endurance athletes that want and use this stuff - watch out!!

cheaters ::)
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 07:00:19 AM
Im not encouraging usage of PEDs for any reason BUT maybe the chic who gets first should be tested if she has like a wicked time or something

this stuff is easy to get (for some) -- youd be surprised at number of endurance athletes that want and use this stuff - watch out!!

cheaters ::)

Perhaps. Honestly I just like to run the races, in no way shape or form do I expect to win. Most females winners finish in about 2 hours 30 min. Shit to qualify for the olympics you have to run a marathon in 2 hours 19 min or less...
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: benchmstr on January 19, 2011, 03:06:16 PM

 DNP? Not true! GH? Probably yes!
you are very naive...

well DNP is about the only shit I know if you take too much you die

I'd rather take gh and smoke trees and die from a heart attack then overheat and feel my insides melt on DNP

bout to say -- if you wanna take it to the next level - hit up some EPO for the 26.2 ;D ;D
EPO is awesome....if i had the chance to use it again i would..

bench
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 19, 2011, 05:49:21 PM
Perhaps. Honestly I just like to run the races, in no way shape or form do I expect to win. Most females winners finish in about 2 hours 30 min. Shit to qualify for the olympics you have to run a marathon in 2 hours 19 min or less...

  The male record 2:04 by a Mexican. It is amazing that, even carrying 40 lbs of bodyweight above the standard woman, men are still able to run a marathon a massive 26 minutes faster than the very best woman. Men's physical superiority is astounding.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: newmom on January 19, 2011, 05:50:00 PM
  The male record 2:04 by a Mexican. It is amazing that, even carrying 40 lbs of bodyweight above the standard woman, men are still able to run a marathon a massive 26 minutes faster than the very best woman. Men's physical superiority is astounding.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

and they usually have longer legs also
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Spike on January 19, 2011, 05:51:23 PM
and they usually have longer legs also

Id rather see a female run

[/no homo] wait [yes hetero]
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 19, 2011, 05:53:35 PM
and they usually have longer legs also

  Sure, but longer legs mean you need more energy to move them due to the fact that there is a greater distance to be moved by eah step, so it even out in the end.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Spike on January 19, 2011, 05:59:02 PM
  Sure, but longer legs mean you need more energy to move them due to the fact that there is a greater distance to be moved by eah step, so it even out in the end.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

yes but stride and gait would be increased - thus covering more distance in shorter amount of time

real factor would be VO2 and type I muscle fiber recruitment - supply of oxygen to active cells would increase performance

men have stronger bones and greater muscle mass - cant compare lions to lambs

still prefer women runners to male runner phys - those tight as black pants females run in - thumbs up
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: benchmstr on January 19, 2011, 06:25:48 PM
yes but stride and gait would be increased - thus covering more distance in shorter amount of time

real factor would be VO2 and type I muscle fiber recruitment - supply of oxygen to active cells would increase performance

men have stronger bones and greater muscle mass - cant compare lions to lambs

still prefer women runners to male runner phys - those tight as black pants females run in - thumbs up
you ever used EPO bro?....its awesome....i would try it at least once...

bench
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: suckmymuscle on January 19, 2011, 06:34:32 PM
yes but stride and gait would be increased - thus covering more distance in shorter amount of time

  My point is that greater energy is needed to give longer steps, so the advantage is nil. Further, men weight more, so the energy required to move a man forward is greater. My point about men's superiority is exactly that: it is incredible that men can outrun women in both short and long distance races despite the fact that they are so much heavier. That is crushing superiority.

Quote
real factor would be VO2 and type I muscle fiber recruitment - supply of oxygen to active cells would increase performance

  Yes, I am not disputing those things. Men have more hemoglobin and larger lungs than women even when you adjust for their greater bodyweight, and men's muscles clear lactic acid much faster than women's muscles do. Then, there is testosterone which increases psychological forcefullness, the "will to win". However, men don't have an advantage over women when it comes to muscles for long-distance running: men have less slow-twitch, type one muscle fibers than women, so they actually have a disadvantage when it comes to this. However, men do have more fast-twitch, type II fibers which is an added advantage in short-distance running.

Quote
men have stronger bones and greater muscle mass - cant compare lions to lambs

  Yes I can, because the bigger muscles and denser bones increase weight which is a disadvantage to running, so the greater ability of muscular contractions in generating energy is nullified by the greater weight. Men can generate more energy to move their bodies, but their bodies weight more so they have no advantage here.

Quote
still prefer women runners to male runner phys - those tight as black pants females run in - thumbs up

  Redundant.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Spike on January 19, 2011, 06:36:15 PM
  My point is that greater energy is needed to give longer steps, so the advantage is nil. Further, men weight more, so the energy required to move a man forward is greater. My point about men's superiority is exactly that: it is incredible that men can outrun women in both short and long distance races despite the fact that they are so much heavier. That is crushing superiority.

  Yes, I am not disputing those things. Men have more hemoglobin and larger lungs than women even when you adjust for their greater bodyweight, and men's muscles clear lactic acid much faster than women's muscles do. Then, there is testosterone which increases psychological forcefullness, the "will to win". However, men don't have an advantage over women when it comes to muscles for long-distance running: men have less slow-twitch, type one muscle fibers than women, so they actually have a disadvantage when it comes to this. However, men do have more fast-twitch, type II fibers which is an added advantage in short-distance running.

  Yes I can, because the bigger muscles and denser bones increase weight which is a disadvantage to running, so the greater ability of muscular contractions in generating energy is nullified by the greater weight, Men can generate more energy to move their bodies, but their bodies weight more so they have no advantage here.

  Redundant.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

good points - I concer
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: benchmstr on January 19, 2011, 06:37:03 PM
good points - I concer
you two going to exchange nudes?

bench
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: Spike on January 19, 2011, 06:37:35 PM
you two going to exchange nudes?

bench

I got some cock shots but Im not goin in time out
Title: Re: pm question anwered
Post by: benchmstr on January 19, 2011, 06:41:38 PM
I got some cock shots but Im not goin in time out
i dont want, or need to see that.....but ron is a big fan of muscle cock...highly doubt you would be in timout....maybe just be locked in rons "rape closet"...which is actually worse!!!

bench