Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Straw Man on January 16, 2011, 05:10:37 PM

Title: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 16, 2011, 05:10:37 PM
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 16, 2011, 06:13:18 PM
 ::)
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 16, 2011, 07:09:52 PM
::)

 :)

did you like the part about the founding fathers ?

Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Emmortal on January 16, 2011, 07:26:44 PM
Beck and Maher should have a show together.
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 16, 2011, 07:34:14 PM
:)

did you like the part about the founding fathers ?


The part that Maher didn't mention is how they would think about dems.  The founding fathers probably would have some issues with some of the tea party folks but I'll bet anything they would be even more digusted with dems and republicans and the direction they've taken America over the years... Bill didn't mention that which is really disingenuous.  Yea, I think they would probably rank the tea party people higher than dems and republicans.
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 16, 2011, 07:37:37 PM
The part that Maher didn't mention is how they would think about dems.  The founding fathers probably would have some issues with some of the tea party folks but I'll bet anything they would be even more digusted with dems and republicans and the direction they've taken America over the years... Bill didn't mention that which is really disingenuous.  Yea, I think they would probably rank the tea party people higher than dems and republicans.

what direction do you think the Dems have taken us in over the years?
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Brixtonbulldog on January 16, 2011, 09:48:37 PM
what direction do you think the Dems have taken us in over the years?

the entitlement state

eminent domain and whittling away of property rights

grossly excessive taxation (the death tax? really?)

the war on small businesses

blocking every attempt to develop a responsible energy plan, drill in the US, and stop sending oil money to our enemies

pushing amnesty laws and open borders (telling national security to go fuck itself, as far as im concerned)

this list could go on forever
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 16, 2011, 10:14:42 PM
the entitlement state

eminent domain and whittling away of property rights

grossly excessive taxation (the death tax? really?)

the war on small businesses

blocking every attempt to develop a responsible energy plan, drill in the US, and stop sending oil money to our enemies

pushing amnesty laws and open borders (telling national security to go fuck itself, as far as im concerned)

this list could go on forever

eminent domain is in the constitution so kind of hard to argue they would be against it

Jefferson was a fan of The Wealth of Nations and had mused whether all heredity privileges should be abolished. 

there is no war on small business so that makes no sense

If we wanted a real energy policy we would look at ways to get off of what we know is a finite source that pollutes our environment and will only become more expensive as it gets more scarce (this is actually a national security issue as well and one the military is aware and concerned about)

I'm not aware Dems are pushing amnesty any more or less then Republicans and I was not aware we had "open" borders



 
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Brixtonbulldog on January 16, 2011, 10:58:30 PM
eminent domain is in the constitution so kind of hard to argue they would be against it

not in the way bureaucrats use it today by violating the bill of rights regarding property/seizure.. not even close

Jefferson was a fan of The Wealth of Nations and had mused whether all heredity privileges should be abolished. 

founding fathers disagreed on a great many issues.  some were put in place and others weren't for good reason.  it is wrong but democrats are not interested in individual rights, only ways to increase tax revenue

there is no war on small business so that makes no sense

dude, get real.. dems have done everything possible to destroy small businesses.  you are just the type to believe capitalism, the free market, and entrepreneurship only exist to create jobs and provide more tax revenue

If we wanted a real energy policy we would look at ways to get off of what we know is a finite source that pollutes our environment and will only become more expensive as it gets more scarce (this is actually a national security issue as well and one the military is aware and concerned about)

WRONG.  completely unrealistic not to continue to aggressively develop existing assets regardless of other efforts to further alternative energy.  it's not one or the other.  democrats stop responsible energy procurement at every turn and use the false flag of caring for the planet as a means to excuse poor energy policy.

I'm not aware Dems are pushing amnesty any more or less then Republicans and I was not aware we had "open" borders

a thinking and informed person cannot possibly believe what you just said.  i didn't say we had open borders.. i said that is the goal.  any liberal thinks we should let everyone in, provide benefits, and use them to vote more dems in.  this has been the standard on the left for decades.

 

you are a hypocrite and a hard line socialist so naturally any logical or reasonable point i just made will fall on deaf ears.  what i said was all completely true and were merely the tip of the iceberg in describing the destruction liberals like yourself have unleashed upon a country founded against everything you stand for.  i could tear apart your misconstrued arguments one by one and tell you how delusional and pathetic you are but you are too dense and it isn't nearly worth the energy.  it is late and arguing pointlessly with a liberal drone won't make someone as politically perverse as yourself stop and think for a fraction of a second. 
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 16, 2011, 11:07:22 PM
you are a hypocrite and a hard line socialist so naturally any logical or reasonable point i just made will fall on deaf ears.  what i said was all completely true and were merely the tip of the iceberg in describing the destruction liberals like yourself have unleashed upon a country founded against everything you stand for.  i could tear apart your misconstrued arguments one by one and tell you how delusional and pathetic you are but you are too dense and it isn't nearly worth the energy.  it is late and arguing pointlessly with a liberal drone won't make someone as politically perverse as yourself stop and think for a fraction of a second. 

lets do one at a time

what property seizure abuses are you attributing to eminent domain?

Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 03:17:46 AM
Kelo -  case closed.
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: George Whorewell on January 17, 2011, 03:31:03 AM
Straw man is ignorant and clueless about everything except washing poor inner city residents genitals. I wouldn't waste too much time debating such a creepy, socialist pedophile.

Moving along, can anyone explain the following contradiction inherent with the Dem's anti big business stance on numerous issues? They bitch about big business and the little guy having his job outsourced yet the following has transpired as of late ( and there are 2000000 other examples);

1) Obamacare is supposed to provide healthcare to all Americans; especially those who can't afford it or have preexisting conditions-- however, it undoubtedly harms small businesses and discourages job growth. Solution? Obama issues several hundred exemptions for big corporations and public sector unions, but none for small businesses.

2)The Dems favor all of these protectionist measures that discourage international trade; allegedly these policies will prevent outsourcing and swell domestic job growth. However, without skipping a beat, the dems favor amnesty for 30 million plus illegal immigrants; at least 20 million of which have taken jobs from Americans after crossing the border and invading the American workforce.

3)The Dems want to limit drilling for oil and natural gas in areas that are virtually barren-- no people, no businesses, scant wildlife etc. So trillions of barrels of oil and natural gas are left beneath the earth while we import our energy from countries that are openly hostile to America and all the while the public gets fucked price wise. The solution? Allow countries we are in direct economic competition with to draw from those same sources and allow oil drilling in heavily populated areas such as the Gulf of Mexico.




I can think of 5 or 6 more off the top of my head. Anyone else can feel free to add.
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 03:36:36 AM
Prevailing wage laws, grossly one sided workers comp laws and insurance requirements, refusal to embrace tort reform, etc. 
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: whork25 on January 17, 2011, 04:15:48 AM
Straw man is ignorant and clueless about everything except washing poor inner city residents genitals. I wouldn't waste too much time debating such a creepy, socialist pedophile.  :o

Moving along, can anyone explain the following contradiction inherent with the Dem's anti big business stance on numerous issues? They bitch about big business and the little guy having his job outsourced yet the following has transpired as of late ( and there are 2000000 other examples);

1) Obamacare is supposed to provide healthcare to all Americans; especially those who can't afford it or have preexisting conditions-- however, it undoubtedly harms small businesses and discourages job growth. Solution? Obama issues several hundred exemptions for big corporations and public sector unions, but none for small businesses.

2)The Dems favor all of these protectionist measures that discourage international trade; allegedly these policies will prevent outsourcing and swell domestic job growth. However, without skipping a beat, the dems favor amnesty for 30 million plus illegal immigrants; at least 20 million of which have taken jobs from Americans after crossing the border and invading the American workforce.

3)The Dems want to limit drilling for oil and natural gas in areas that are virtually barren-- no people, no businesses, scant wildlife etc. So trillions of barrels of oil and natural gas are left beneath the earth while we import our energy from countries that are openly hostile to America and all the while the public gets fucked price wise. The solution? Allow countries we are in direct economic competition with to draw from those same sources and allow oil drilling in heavily populated areas such as the Gulf of Mexico.




I can think of 5 or 6 more off the top of my head. Anyone else can feel free to add.

Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Brixtonbulldog on January 17, 2011, 08:01:58 AM
lets do one at a time

what property seizure abuses are you attributing to eminent domain?



local officials have made numerous deals using eminent domain to take parcels of rural private property for 'gov't use' and then turn around and sell to development corporations.  this happened adjacent to my neighborhood and the major players were all democrats who give half a shit for the desires of people in the community and decided to go ahead and do it anyway because it would generate tens of millions of dollars per year in tax revenue.  one family was offered a certain amount in compensation for thier 2 acre home and refused at any cost.  now the county and state are working to prevent letting the owner's children inherit it and turn it into a fucking gas station for mall-goers.  you should see this neighborhood.  i see signs in front lawns screaming bloody murder about how maryland/anne arundel county are fascist scum/dictators/criminals, etc.  And, of course, this whole area is overwhelmingly socialist because black people and some inner city upper crust yuppies consistently vote democratic and then spend the next 2-4-8 years complaining how shitty maryland is (and usually blurt insane arguments somehow blaming bush for this, go figure).

this has been happening for years all over the country.. gov't intervention to usurp and 're-distribute' private property, mostly to developers and for money.   
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 08:07:59 AM
Straw - do you approve of the SC's ruling in Kelo v. City of New London?



IMHO -that is where Palin swung and missed huge in her interview w Couric.  

If she simply said Kelo, which everyone needs to know about, she would be held in much higher regard right now.  

When I heard the interview with couric the first time I screamed   "KELO DAMN IT!"
 
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: tonymctones on January 17, 2011, 08:20:16 AM
lol doesnt suprise me at all that you watch this moron straw...
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 08:23:16 AM
Mahar is a such a complete joke its not even funny.   
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 17, 2011, 10:18:33 AM
local officials have made numerous deals using eminent domain to take parcels of rural private property for 'gov't use' and then turn around and sell to development corporations.  this happened adjacent to my neighborhood and the major players were all democrats who give half a shit for the desires of people in the community and decided to go ahead and do it anyway because it would generate tens of millions of dollars per year in tax revenue.  one family was offered a certain amount in compensation for thier 2 acre home and refused at any cost.  now the county and state are working to prevent letting the owner's children inherit it and turn it into a fucking gas station for mall-goers.  you should see this neighborhood.  i see signs in front lawns screaming bloody murder about how maryland/anne arundel county are fascist scum/dictators/criminals, etc.  And, of course, this whole area is overwhelmingly socialist because black people and some inner city upper crust yuppies consistently vote democratic and then spend the next 2-4-8 years complaining how shitty maryland is (and usually blurt insane arguments somehow blaming bush for this, go figure).

this has been happening for years all over the country.. gov't intervention to usurp and 're-distribute' private property, mostly to developers and for money.   

I figured you'd either bring up local examples or something like that.

there are many examples like that where I would almost certainaly agree with you

for example, when George Bush and his business partners used eminent domain to seize private land to build a baseball stadium

but that's an example of local government "abuse" so if you don't like it then get angry at your state government.   

do you have any examples of such abuse by the federal government?
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 10:22:37 AM
I figured you'd either bring up local examples or something like that.

there are many examples like that where I would almost certainaly agree with you

for example, when George Bush and his business partners used eminent domain to seize private land to build a baseball stadium

but that's an example of local government "abuse" so if you don't like it then get angry at your state government.   

do you have any examples of such abuse by the federal government?


Again Straw - Kelo v. City of New London   
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 17, 2011, 10:28:20 AM
Kelo -  case closed.

yep, we've talked about it before and in general I agree with you and as always, started at the local level with local governments with the motivation of trying to redevelop part of a city

this kind of thing is not the frequent and usually not that controversial

In the aftermath of Kelo didn't many states change their laws?



Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 10:30:25 AM
yep, we've talked about it before and in general I agree with you and as always, started at the local level with local governments with the motivation of trying to redevelop part of a city

this kind of thing is not the frequent and usually not that controversial

In the aftermath of Kelo didn't many states change their laws?





Some did some didnt, but many cases arose using Kelo as the precedent to destroy private property to justify prvate development by politically connected people.   


Kelo was a complete disgrace. 
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: kcballer on January 17, 2011, 10:53:00 AM
Hilarious! Love it. 
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: kcballer on January 17, 2011, 10:54:52 AM
the entitlement state

eminent domain and whittling away of property rights

grossly excessive taxation (the death tax? really?)

the war on small businesses

blocking every attempt to develop a responsible energy plan, drill in the US, and stop sending oil money to our enemies

pushing amnesty laws and open borders (telling national security to go fuck itself, as far as im concerned)

this list could go on forever

A word on oil.  We get an increasingly large % from Canada.  The 2nd largest oil country in the world.  I don't think they are our enemy and they're building more and more infrastructure to get more and more oil down here to the US.  Drilling off shore won't change that and in fact would be pointless considering the vast resource available in Canada.   
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Brixtonbulldog on January 17, 2011, 11:02:04 AM
A word on oil.  We get an increasingly large % from Canada.  The 2nd largest oil country in the world.  I don't think they are our enemy and they're building more and more infrastructure to get more and more oil down here to the US.  Drilling off shore won't change that and in fact would be pointless considering the vast resource available in Canada.   


glad to hear that actually.  what %?

still disagree big time that drilling on US property is pointless. this is especially true considering the estimated amount available and the ease at which we could get to it.  i find it interesting that regulations actually made drilling more dangerous by requiring it to be in such remote areas (deep water).  it made it nearly impossible to stop a leak that could have been stopped in a couple days if it were more accessable.  i wish we could get ANWR but canada is a great resource.
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 11:06:45 AM

glad to hear that actually.  what %?

still disagree big time that drilling on US property is pointless. this is especially true considering the estimated amount available and the ease at which we could get to it.  i find it interesting that regulations actually made drilling more dangerous by requiring it to be in such remote areas (deep water).  it made it nearly impossible to stop a leak that could have been stopped in a couple days if it were more accessable.  i wish we could get ANWR but canada is a great resource.

The far left eco-kooks like KC havebeen telling that same bogus lie for my entire lifetime.  I'm sick of these economic illiterates who wont allow anything, whether it be nukes, oil, coal, natural gas, all while the average middle class guy gets fucked.


IMHO - the eco-nazi left are no different than financial terrorists.       
   
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Brixtonbulldog on January 17, 2011, 11:11:37 AM
The far left eco-kooks like KC havebeen telling that same bogus lie for my entire lifetime.  I'm sick of these economic illiterates who wont allow anything, whether it be nukes, oil, coal, natural gas, all while the average middle class guy gets fucked.


IMHO - the eco-nazi left are no different than financial terrorists.       
   

that's why i want to see something more substantial.. if i someone tells me that and then i see a figure that we get about 4% and that's up two points in ten years?? lol, typical liberal 'fact' now that i think about it.
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 11:17:26 AM
Liberals, leftists, progressives, marxists, democrats, enviro-nazis, etc really piss me off to no end.   They try to claim that they are for the lower and middle class,  yet almost every fucking policy they advcate ends up costing the loer and middle lass more costs, more taxes, more inflation, etc.     
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 17, 2011, 11:56:49 AM
Liberals, leftists, progressives, marxists, democrats, enviro-nazis, etc really piss me off to no end.    They try to claim that they are for the lower and middle class,  yet almost every fucking policy they advcate ends up costing the loer and middle lass more costs, more taxes, more inflation, etc.     

we know

fuck, almost everything pisses you off

most of the time you just imagine something to be true and get pissed off

Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 12:04:46 PM
we know

fuck, almost everything pisses you off

most of the time you just imagine something to be true and get pissed off




Please Straw - every single policy advocatedby the far left is doused in flowery language yet always accompanied by higher costs, worse service, more taxes, more regulation, more red tape, etc.   
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: chadstallion on January 17, 2011, 12:10:54 PM
Bill Maher should interview Sarah Palin.
I'd pay double to HBO for that program.
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 17, 2011, 12:19:24 PM

Please Straw - every single policy advocatedby the far left is doused in flowery language yet always accompanied by higher costs, worse service, more taxes, more regulation, more red tape, etc.   

like I said

first you imagine something to be true

and then you get pissed
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: chadstallion on January 17, 2011, 02:31:58 PM
like I said

first you imagine something to be true

and then you get pissed
;D
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Soul Crusher on January 17, 2011, 02:34:13 PM
like I said

first you imagine something to be true

and then you get pissed

Tell me even one leftist policy that works and that is not on the verge of complete collapse?   

www.usdebtclock.org


 
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: tonymctones on January 17, 2011, 02:37:09 PM
Tell me even one leftist policy that works and that is not on the verge of complete collapse?   

www.usdebtclock.org


 
the post office is doing just fine, right straw?
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: 240 is Back on January 17, 2011, 04:43:21 PM
Tell me even one leftist policy that works and that is not on the verge of complete collapse?   

www.usdebtclock.org

it's neither left nor right.  both parties will green light raising the debt ceiling.
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 17, 2011, 05:10:23 PM
the post office is doing just fine, right straw?

does your mail show up?

Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: tonymctones on January 17, 2011, 05:13:49 PM
does your mail show up?


hahahah i guess that makes them being in the red for years and years ok then, right straw?

post office is doing just fine LMAO hhahhahahhahaa
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 17, 2011, 05:22:14 PM
hahahah i guess that makes them being in the red for years and years ok then, right straw?

post office is doing just fine LMAO hhahhahahhahaa

the whole country is in the red

don't you remember Cheney saying deficits don't matter

don't you remember Reagan budget director placing the blame for the current debt on the Republicans who deluded themselves into believing that deficits from tax cuts somehow don't matter

btw - if you have a problem with the post office then tell them to stop delivering your mail.
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: tonymctones on January 17, 2011, 05:28:36 PM
the whole country is in the red

don't you remember Cheney saying deficits don't matter

don't you remember Reagan budget director placing the blame for the current debt on the Republicans who deluded themselves into believing that deficits from tax cuts somehow don't matter

btw - if you have a problem with the post office then tell them to stop delivering your mail.
actually the whole country is NOT in the red, corporations are right now seating on more capital than ever b/c they were able to become leaner and more efficient...

but hey as long as youre ok with the post office being in the red for years now, and that still meaning they are doing just fine hahahhahhhahahha hahahhahah

Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 17, 2011, 05:43:17 PM
actually the whole country is NOT in the red, corporations are right now seating on more capital than ever b/c they were able to become leaner and more efficient...

but hey as long as youre ok with the post office being in the red for years now, and that still meaning they are doing just fine hahahhahhhahahha hahahhahah

you thought when I said the whole country was in the red I was referring to corporations?

that explains alot about your state of constant confusion
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: tonymctones on January 17, 2011, 07:08:36 PM
you thought when I said the whole country was in the red I was referring to corporations?

that explains alot about your state of constant confusion
oh you mean states or the federal govt?

actually there are a number of states that arent in the red  ;)
Title: Re: New Rules
Post by: Straw Man on January 17, 2011, 07:34:15 PM
oh you mean states or the federal govt?

actually there are a number of states that arent in the red  ;)

good to hear

which states are you referring to?