Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: closeline on January 22, 2011, 05:40:27 AM

Title: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: closeline on January 22, 2011, 05:40:27 AM
even the priest is wider
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: mass243 on January 22, 2011, 05:47:33 AM
See how ugly Wolf's physique is compared to Lee's!!!

Being tall just don't suit bodybuilder (not saying Wolf is actually tall but by bb standards). Unfortunately.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: JOEBEAST on January 22, 2011, 05:52:09 AM
See how ugly Wolf's physique is compared to Lee's!!!

Being tall just don't suit bodybuilder (not saying Wolf is actually tall but by bb standards). Unfortunately.
time for glasses
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: tendonitis on January 22, 2011, 06:06:52 AM
See how ugly Wolf's physique is compared to Lee's!!!

Being tall just don't suit bodybuilder (not saying Wolf is actually tall but by bb standards). Unfortunately.

dude, you are clueless
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: JasonH on January 22, 2011, 06:10:14 AM
Heath isn't narrow.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Shockwave on January 22, 2011, 06:17:27 AM
See how ugly Wolf's physique is compared to Lee's!!!

Being tall just don't suit bodybuilder (not saying Wolf is actually tall but by bb standards). Unfortunately.
Wolf>Lee especially in that pic.
Looks like judging bodybuilders doesnt suit you. Time to go get involved in another sport methinks.
Or better glasses.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: SF1900 on January 22, 2011, 06:19:53 AM
Damn, Lees arms are ridiculous in that pic  :o :o
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: mass243 on January 22, 2011, 06:31:06 AM
OK, Maybe it's just me then as everybody else here seems to prefer Wolf over Lee...

Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Alexander D on January 22, 2011, 06:35:57 AM
fellas GOD OF HORMONES tell you this many times liar priest mutant shit shit of a humane being,, he woud sell his otwn mother for GH,,, for he take GH for many many years all while telling those around him he is a natural,, and not jujst little big of GH that gym rats you and I know take 2IU, 3IU,, this little mutant takes massive doses and then liars about it in the worst way,, he is scum bag midget dwarf,, and will never step fot on IFBB stage again

gh15 approved.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Archer77 on January 22, 2011, 09:08:28 AM
See how ugly Wolf's physique is compared to Lee's!!!

Being tall just don't suit bodybuilder (not saying Wolf is actually tall but by bb standards). Unfortunately.
'


You've got to be a short guy.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: mass243 on January 22, 2011, 09:15:31 AM
'


You've got to be a short guy.

No, actually I'm pretty tall  :(
Too tall for bodybuilder - I think I'm something like fuckin'  6'1" (by fast conversion).
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: smoothasf on January 22, 2011, 10:28:53 AM
Apart from his chest lee kills these guys. Even if he is a liar
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Spike on January 22, 2011, 10:31:20 AM
Apart from his chest lee kills these guys. Even if he is short as all hell
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: geneticmarvel on January 22, 2011, 10:33:38 AM
Lee is all arms, and synthol at that.
Wonder how much Heath can military press...
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: delta9mda on January 22, 2011, 10:39:30 AM
wolf is pretty much owning this pic.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Tito24 on January 22, 2011, 10:41:01 AM
phil heath is so narrow he has to run through the shower to get wet.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Meso_z on January 22, 2011, 10:58:14 AM
Lee completely DOMINATES in that pic. period. no arguing here.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Rhinestone Cowgirl on January 22, 2011, 11:02:53 AM
Look at all the morons coming out of the woodwork here comparing different lit pictures and a photoshop that isn't scaled to size to modern day bodybuilding.  ::)
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Anglo on January 22, 2011, 11:06:39 AM

What show was that   ;D
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: L00n on January 22, 2011, 11:11:23 AM
What show was that   ;D

remove wolf and is a midget show.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Tito24 on January 22, 2011, 11:12:10 AM
show of strength
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: JP_RC on January 22, 2011, 11:16:19 AM
Heath is not narrower than Priest...he is just not hitting the pose correctly.

Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: dj181 on January 22, 2011, 12:33:25 PM
5'7" is the perfect height for bodybuilding, and 5'3" is the perfect height for a female (especially with regards to gorgeous asses, as petite women have the best asses BY FAR)
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: mass243 on January 22, 2011, 12:41:04 PM
5'7" is the perfect height for bodybuilding, and 5'3" is the perfect height for a female (especially with regards to gorgeous asses, as petite women have the best asses BY FAR)

Once you're correct - though even shorter for bodybuilder is not such a bad thing.

Worst thing would be if you were blessed with genetics to grow like weed and then you're tall like for example Gunther... you never fill out the frame and always look small compared to shorter guys or at least worse than them.

It's not coincidence that most (successful) pros are relatively short. Bodybuilding is not a sport (or whatever) for tall people.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on January 22, 2011, 01:13:22 PM
Apart from his chest lee kills these guys. Even if he is a liar

What about Liar's nonexistant back?  ::)
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: spude on January 22, 2011, 01:20:05 PM
5'7" is the perfect height for bodybuilding, and 5'3" is the perfect height for a female (especially with regards to gorgeous asses, as petite women have the best asses BY FAR)

dat is 100% true, dj ma man...
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Parker on January 22, 2011, 01:37:05 PM
Apart from his chest lee kills these guys. Even if he is a liar
Its a photochop, because Lee was never compares to these guys on the same stage---he would have gotten killed...
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: jude2 on January 22, 2011, 07:30:02 PM
Lee is all arms, and synthol at that.
Wonder how much Heath can military press...
Lee's arms were huge, before synthol was around ;)
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 22, 2011, 07:41:55 PM
What show was that   ;D


its not a from a show..... those three have'nt actually been onstage together .....
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: dogbowl on January 22, 2011, 07:43:07 PM
If Wolf had better calves then that might be the best front lat spread ever

Edited to add:  If you're going to have bigger thighs than Dorian, you also need calves bigger than his.  He had the right proportions of upper to lower leg, IMO.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 22, 2011, 07:47:01 PM
If Wolf had better calves then that might be the best front lat spread ever

Edited to add:  If you're going to have bigger thighs than Dorian, you also need calves bigger than his.  He had the right proportions of upper to lower leg, IMO.


nonsense


dorian had the best lats from the front ever .........and probably the best front lat spread...(overall pose)
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: dogbowl on January 22, 2011, 07:49:28 PM

nonsense


dorian had the best lats from the front ever .........and probably the best front lat spread...(overall pose)

No argument from me here.  There was a big "if" in my statement.  I think a lot of guys now have thighs which ruin their proportions, including Ronnie.  Calves in general seemed to have hit their limit, while thighs are bigger than ever.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 22, 2011, 07:52:09 PM
No argument from me here.  There was a big "if" in my statement.  I think a lot of guys now have thighs which ruin their proportions, including Ronnie.  Calves in general seemed to have hit their limit, while thighs are bigger than ever.

yep i agree..... calves need to be in proportion to the thighs...... dorian/nasser/matarazzo.......... as u said ..... thighs are gettin bigger and bigger..... and most guys have shite calves...... wolf/coleman/dexter/ etc etc
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Emmortal on January 22, 2011, 07:53:33 PM
yep i agree..... calves need to be in proportion to the thighs...... dorian/nasser/matarazzo.......... as u said ..... thighs are gettin bigger and bigger..... and most guys have shite calves...... wolf/coleman/dexter/ etc etc

Kai, Branch, Heath, Jay all have pretty good calves.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: geneticmarvel on January 22, 2011, 08:44:40 PM
Lee's arms were huge, before synthol was around ;)

eat this lee worshipper
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 22, 2011, 08:46:20 PM



lol wtf.......what happened to lee?.......ive been outta the loop whats the story?
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: jude2 on January 22, 2011, 09:33:14 PM
eat this lee worshipper
You stupid ass that is when he tore his bicep. You youngsters.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Jadeveon Clowney on January 22, 2011, 09:40:13 PM
You stupid ass that is when he tore his bicep. You youngsters.

Synthol causes muscle tears.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: jude2 on January 22, 2011, 09:47:53 PM
Point is lee had huge arms like 20 years ago, way before synthol. I have never seen Greg V with torn biceps.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: geneticmarvel on January 22, 2011, 09:49:16 PM
Point is lee had huge arms like 20 years ago, way before synthol. I have never seen Greg V with torn biceps.

lee it is you
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 22, 2011, 09:50:00 PM
You stupid ass that is when he tore his bicep. You youngsters.


torn bicep does'nt normally look like that.......shame though, lee had the arms
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: TRIX on January 22, 2011, 09:58:43 PM
even the priest is wider

lees arms arent better or bigger then heaths, nor is is head 1.5 times larger then heaths, strong scaling phaggot

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=363692.0;attach=399256;image)

but yes heath is narrow (particularly his chest width)

(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs586.ash2/150817_10150319712350276_14917350275_15834411_8149708_n.jpg)
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: jude2 on January 22, 2011, 10:09:18 PM
lee it is you
No its gh15 jk. You know Lee is just AAS and GH, not synthol.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Meso_z on January 22, 2011, 10:21:44 PM
I wish i was that "narrow".  ::)
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: TRIX on January 22, 2011, 10:45:54 PM
(http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/tt241/donleopoldo/7351-1.jpg)

looooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo l
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: DSM18 on January 22, 2011, 11:02:30 PM
What show was that   ;D

it was photoshop classic!
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: flexingtonsteele on January 22, 2011, 11:47:21 PM
(http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/tt241/donleopoldo/7351-1.jpg)

looooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo l

i know he's the closest to the camera but its crazy how wolf just absolutely owns everyone in pure size and width.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 22, 2011, 11:57:30 PM
it was photoshop classic!


 8)
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: closeline on January 23, 2011, 02:50:20 AM

 8)

exactly !

2011 PSC first callout
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Fatpanda on January 23, 2011, 03:00:00 AM
i've said it before and i'll say it again.

lee priest has the greatest ever arms in bodybuilding.

heaths are good - but the priests are great.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: closeline on January 23, 2011, 03:11:52 AM
i've said it before and i'll say it again.

lee priest has the greatest ever arms in bodybuilding.

heaths are good - but the priests are great.

heath are synthetic shit

priest are good but to short to  be great

great : arnold , ronnie,
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Parker on January 23, 2011, 03:27:13 AM
i've said it before and i'll say it again.

lee priest has the greatest ever arms in bodybuilding.

heaths are good - but the priests are great.
Why, do you think Lee's are the greatest in bbing? State your reasoning... 
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on January 23, 2011, 05:25:53 AM
even the priest is wider

they look like stairs ;D
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Tito24 on January 23, 2011, 05:41:23 AM
yes liar priest is wider
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Fatpanda on January 23, 2011, 06:44:37 AM
Why, do you think Lee's are the greatest in bbing? State your reasoning... 

look at them ! they are complete, large, thick/dense, detailed, balanced.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: geneticmarvel on January 23, 2011, 07:53:11 AM
look at them ! they are complete, large, thick/dense, detailed, balanced.

Arnold and Coleman. I wouldnt want arms like Lee's
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Fatpanda on January 23, 2011, 07:53:49 AM
Arnold and Coleman. I wouldnt want arms like Lee's

both had poor tri's compared to bi's.

not to mention no forearms
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: mass243 on January 23, 2011, 08:14:50 AM
both had poor tri's compared to bi's.

not to mention no forearms

For once panda is right!
Lees arms were complete package. He had it all; biceps, triceps and forearms.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 23, 2011, 08:40:55 AM
both had poor tri's compared to bi's.

not to mention no forearms

I agree Priest stands alone in arms , although Phil may beat or be at the least equal to him , Heath has the triceps , and forearms not sure his biceps are better than Lee's.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Fatpanda on January 23, 2011, 08:51:09 AM
once again panda is right!
Lees arms were complete package. He had it all; biceps, triceps and forearms.

fixed for truth.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: SilverSpoon on January 23, 2011, 09:44:36 AM
While Lee's arms are no doubt complete, they are too "stubby", due to him being approximately 5'2.
I know he says he is 5'4" or some nonsense, but I am 6'1" tall on the dot, my friend is 5'5" (who competes) and when we met Priest, my friend towered over him.

In my opinion, Sergio Oliva's arms, after training with Jones for the 1972 Olympia in Essen, were the most complete arms we will ever see (forearms, bis and tris).
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 23, 2011, 09:53:10 AM
While Lee's arms are no doubt complete, they are too "stubby", due to him being approximately 5'2.
I know he says he is 5'4" or some nonsense, but I am 6'1" tall on the dot, my friend is 5'5" (who competes) and when we met Priest, my friend towered over him.

In my opinion, Sergio Oliva's arms, after training with Jones for the 1972 Olympia in Essen, were the most complete arms we will ever see (forearms, bis and tris).

Sergios biceps sucked always have always will
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: yates fan on January 23, 2011, 09:55:32 AM
sergio while massive had very little peak to his bicep.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: closeline on January 23, 2011, 09:56:54 AM
Sergios biceps sucked always have always will

correct, he had strange shape , would not want to have such ugly arms

Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: dj181 on January 23, 2011, 10:03:34 AM
Sergio's biceps "sucked" because he literally couldn't flex his arm completely, coz he arms were so massive
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 23, 2011, 10:09:21 AM
Sergio's biceps "sucked" because he literally couldn't flex his arm completely, coz he arms were so massive

give me a fucking break
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 23, 2011, 10:10:40 AM
 :-\
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 23, 2011, 10:12:24 AM
biceps leave a lot to be desired , triceps and forearms were oustanding
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: dj181 on January 23, 2011, 10:16:28 AM
Those aren't my words, AJ said that, and if you know anything about Jones you know that 1. He doesn't lie 2. He was literally obsessed with measurements, calculations, etc
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on January 23, 2011, 10:22:53 AM
albert beckles arms (bi/tri) are among the best ever!!..
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on January 23, 2011, 10:24:44 AM
Those aren't my words, AJ said that, and if you know anything about Jones you know that 1. He doesn't lie 2. He was literally obsessed with measurements, calculations, etc

lmao he doesn't lie  ::) see the pics I posted he's clearly flexing them perfectly fine
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 23, 2011, 02:59:55 PM
lee priest..... most complete arms i can think of atm.......sergio didnt fully contract the biceps and did the palms facing out thing to make his biceps appear longer ..... when he already had a low biceps tie in.... idiot, his son seems to do the same thing

beckles had awesome peaked biceps and great tris...... no forearms though and jaggy elbows

heath has the arms.......amazing forearm development..... bis and tris are there too.....

matarazzo had complete massive arms.........

coleman obviously .....but no tris ....they appeared flat although they were not at all small

Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: dogbowl on January 23, 2011, 03:10:36 PM
sergio didnt fully contract the biceps and did the palms facing out thing to make his biceps appear longer ..... when he already had a low biceps tie in

I'm going to agree with the negative comments about his biceps.  He had a strange way of flexing his arms in the front double biceps
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 23, 2011, 03:17:57 PM
I'm going to agree with the negative comments about his biceps.  He had a strange way of flexing his arms in the front double biceps


he didnt close his arm enough to contract the biceps...... also always had his palms facing outwards which makes the biceps appear long and flat.........
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: Alexander D on January 23, 2011, 03:18:16 PM
lee priest..... most complete arms i can think of atm.......sergio didnt fully contract the biceps and did the palms facing out thing to make his biceps appear longer ..... when he already had a low biceps tie in.... idiot, his son seems to do the same thing

beckles had awesome peaked biceps and great tris...... no forearms though and jaggy elbows

heath has the arms.......amazing forearm development..... bis and tris are there too.....

matarazzo had complete massive arms.........

coleman obviously .....but no tris ....they appeared flat although they were not at all small




Gayer than Johnnynoname watching Andersoon Cooper 360 and masturbating.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: arce1988 on January 23, 2011, 03:30:54 PM
ttt
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 23, 2011, 03:45:16 PM

Gayer than Johnnynoname watching Andersoon Cooper 360 and masturbating.


what u talkin about son......... fukn child that uses "gay" to describe everything..... nice vocabulary there pal




whats wrong with the post?

do u even know what im talkin about and have any sort of educated opinion on the subject being dicussed?

hahhahhahaha fuckin child    8)
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: geneticmarvel on January 23, 2011, 03:46:13 PM
I agree Priest stands alone in arms , although Phil may beat or be at the least equal to him , Heath has the triceps , and forearms not sure his biceps are better than Lee's.

Phils arms are just inflated cream puffs. They dont look dense or powerful at all.
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: monstercalves on January 23, 2011, 03:51:49 PM
Phils arms are just inflated cream puffs. They dont look dense or powerful at all.


a lot has to do with his particular skin type i would think.....and hes young....


nothin to do with not bein ripped enough.......

his arms will look harder by the time hes mr O.....
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: flinstones1 on January 23, 2011, 04:19:39 PM
5'7" is the perfect height for bodybuilding, and 5'3" is the perfect height for a female (especially with regards to gorgeous asses, as petite women have the best asses BY FAR)

a tall women with a great ass is very attractive because its rare..almost more rare than a "brother" as narrow as phil you just dont see that shit much
Title: Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
Post by: geneticmarvel on January 23, 2011, 06:26:02 PM

a lot has to do with his particular skin type i would think.....and hes young....


nothin to do with not bein ripped enough.......

his arms will look harder by the time hes mr O.....

Its has more to do with him having no muscle density.