Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: affeman on February 19, 2011, 12:55:15 PM

Title: Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: affeman on February 19, 2011, 12:55:15 PM
 :o

(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114822.jpg)
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Mr. Magoo on February 19, 2011, 12:55:59 PM
damn
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Hulkotron on February 19, 2011, 12:56:15 PM
Reverse-Palumboism?
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: tommywishbone on February 19, 2011, 12:57:17 PM
Damn is right.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Bobby on February 19, 2011, 12:57:25 PM
Reverse-Palumboism?

lol ;D
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: spinnis on February 19, 2011, 12:57:38 PM
In before hazbin posts the photo of himself and him.


And oh, holy FUCK, I wonder what the waistline / thigh measure is. during vacuum, leg looks bigger
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: tbombz on February 19, 2011, 12:58:36 PM
(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114859.jpg)
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Van_Bilderass on February 19, 2011, 01:00:10 PM
Yeah, too bad about the middleweight back.

Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: spinnis on February 19, 2011, 01:00:47 PM
why do getbig resize the fucking photos! (right clikc and Show photo)

his back wasn't as impressive, and needs to ger harder, crazy hard from the front though
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: tbombz on February 19, 2011, 01:02:53 PM
(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114880.jpg)
(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114910.jpg)
(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114902.jpg)
(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114867.jpg)
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: spinnis on February 19, 2011, 01:03:01 PM
"big" dan hill looks like soft poop hahaha
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Boost on February 19, 2011, 01:03:11 PM
Crazy from the front,

BUT......


those delts look full of oil from the back. No separation. He's pretty smooth from behind
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: tendonitis on February 19, 2011, 01:03:24 PM
(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114859.jpg)

yikes, delts look a little "full"
back is way behind his front
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: affeman on February 19, 2011, 01:03:36 PM
Palumbo says Wolf and Centopani are spot on, while Dex is considerable off. Could be interesting.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: 240 is Back on February 19, 2011, 01:07:07 PM
Holy *@&^$*(@&#^$*(@&#^$*(&

Big Ben looks sick
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: JasonH on February 19, 2011, 01:12:22 PM
Looks very good - big and full, although could maybe do with being a tad drier.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 19, 2011, 01:40:59 PM
:o

(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114822.jpg)

Looks SIKK !!!



























in one pose  :-\
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 19, 2011, 01:41:58 PM
Dexter is off.... and how can a former My. Olympia be missing a complete bodypart?  CALVES???

How does he get away with this?????

Blade doesn't look so sharp and Ronnie was missing calves for his entire career nothing new
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: flexingtonsteele on February 19, 2011, 01:43:31 PM
(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114859.jpg)

top 3 from the front.

but his lack of a back/arms and being so soft from behind really hurts him.

Should be about 6th or so.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: flexingtonsteele on February 19, 2011, 01:44:51 PM
Dexter is off.... and how can a former My. Olympia be missing a complete bodypart?  CALVES???

How does he get away with this?????

grant take it ez on dex's calves.

sometimes its hard for us brotha's to grow em :)
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: che on February 19, 2011, 01:45:23 PM
:o

(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114822.jpg)

Looks like shit  , zero flow ,modern bodybuilding sucks.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: che on February 19, 2011, 01:47:00 PM
grant take it ez on dex's calves.

sometimes its hard for us brotha's to grow em :)
Yeah, usually they don't grow if you don't train them.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: dr.chimps on February 19, 2011, 01:48:22 PM
Amazing 3-D lower body. Solid enough upper-body, especially from the front, but the underwhelming arms are a glaringly obvious weakness. That's a long way to come to lose it at the finish line.  :-\
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: flexingtonsteele on February 19, 2011, 01:49:01 PM
Yeah, usually they don't grow if you don't train them.

look at most black pro athletes. id say 75-80% have bout the same type of calf development as dexter does.

he trains em.

but calves are 100% a genetics thing.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Meso_z on February 19, 2011, 01:50:30 PM
 :o
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: che on February 19, 2011, 01:53:20 PM
look at most black pro athletes. id say 75-80% have bout the same type of calf development as dexter does.

he trains em.

but calves are 100% a genetics thing.
BS ,look at black bodybuilders from the 70's & 80's they all had good calves (except T Pearson) nowadays even white BB have shit  calves.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: kyomu on February 19, 2011, 02:14:09 PM
Enormous delts. :o
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Jaime on February 19, 2011, 02:18:57 PM
Looks like shit  , zero flow ,modern bodybuilding sucks.


This.

Looks like complete shit.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Parker on February 19, 2011, 02:29:31 PM
Dexter is off.... and how can a former My. Olympia be missing a complete bodypart?  CALVES???

How does he get away with this?????
Like he doesn't care anymore---like he has Chris Cormier Disease (being effed over for the last 2 yrs).
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Dipadidu on February 19, 2011, 02:43:39 PM

This.

Looks like complete shit.

*2

He is all arms without good arms...
Beside quads he looks like smashed assholes
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Marty Champions on February 19, 2011, 03:05:32 PM
how come no horseshoe on that dudes tricep, is it so pumped up with oil /steroids that it cannot contract into a horseshoe?
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: hench on February 19, 2011, 03:14:08 PM
Looks SIKK !!!



























in one pose  :-\
was thinking the same thing
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Schmoff on February 19, 2011, 03:31:29 PM
what's up with the face, why do modern bodybuilders have to to make ugly faces on stage like they are shitting or having a stroke or something.  :-X
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: George Whorewell on February 19, 2011, 04:31:27 PM
Oily delts, weird looking and weak back, ugly inhuman looking all drugs type physique. Impressive nonetheless though. At first I thought the pic was photoshopped. HIs proportions are insane.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: magicuser on February 19, 2011, 04:35:24 PM
less time on quads delts more on chest n abs
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: littleguns on February 19, 2011, 04:52:08 PM
Something night right with delts....light oil but not alot....or maybe shopped
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: no one on February 19, 2011, 04:55:02 PM

im amazed at how much size he has put on since the Nats but has kept his waistline tight.

im not talking about his stomach, but his torso in general.

you can even see how blocky centropani's waist line/ torso is becoming.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: littleguns on February 19, 2011, 05:19:30 PM
My moneys on this guy...

Jeez I havent competed in a few yrs now and I still look better and I'm a natty
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Coach is Back! on February 19, 2011, 05:24:51 PM
:o

(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114822.jpg)

James Carville looking thick.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Wiggs on February 19, 2011, 07:19:59 PM
This is even's show.  Dude looks like a top 6 mr. o contender.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: dr.chimps on February 19, 2011, 07:23:53 PM
James Carville looking thick.
Ha! Excellent! It's the the economy, stupid!   ;D
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Master Blaster on February 19, 2011, 08:19:49 PM
check out the loss of definition in the mid-lower pec area combined with the sunken upper pec

thats some kind illusion happening there    ;)

(http://contests.flexonline.com/images/contests/23/large/114822.jpg)

pecs are a problem, looses thickness on front lat spread esp. traps
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Master Blaster on February 19, 2011, 08:24:38 PM
No homo x 2

See how the inner tie in of the lower pecs keep a soft puffy full quality despite a double bicep stretch ?

that a fucking cosmetic little application...very stealth

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=367098.0;attach=402947;image)

Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Master Blaster on February 19, 2011, 08:26:54 PM
No homo x 2

See how the inner tie in of the lower pecs keep a soft puffy full quality despite a double bicep stretch ?

that a fucking cosmetic little application...very stealth

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=367098.0;attach=402947;image)



heres a comparison of pecs with less synthol

(http://www.learn-bodybuilding.com/images/flex_wheeler_front_double_biceps.jpg)
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: pedro01 on February 19, 2011, 09:33:12 PM
He's kept the abs tight & that hand has healed up nicely....

Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: tbombz on February 19, 2011, 09:38:02 PM
My moneys on this guy...

Jeez I havent competed in a few yrs now and I still look better and I'm a natty
::) your delusional if you think you look remotely similar
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: 20inch calves on February 19, 2011, 09:40:06 PM
BS ,look at black bodybuilders from the 70's & 80's they all had good calves (except T Pearson) nowadays even white BB have shit  calves.


sorry you are wrong. white bbers with good calves...evan, ben p, eric frankhouser, jay, should i go on
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: George Whorewell on February 19, 2011, 10:02:24 PM
look at most black pro athletes. id say 75-80% have bout the same type of calf development as dexter does.

he trains em.

but calves are 100% a genetics thing.

Racist post reported. Stereotypes are hurtful.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Matt C on February 20, 2011, 02:16:46 AM
Dexter is off.... and how can a former My. Olympia be missing a complete bodypart?  CALVES???

How does he get away with this?????

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=367098.0;attach=402952;image)

Seems like once they hit 40 the legs are the first things to go.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Meso_z on February 20, 2011, 03:52:12 AM
He looked better last year.
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: kyomu on February 20, 2011, 04:06:00 AM
He looked better last year.
Woa. Thats true!!
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: closeline on February 20, 2011, 04:46:07 AM
Looks like shit  , zero flow ,modern bodybuilding sucks.

x2

and legs look bigger than they are because of their shortness

freak not bb
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: closeline on February 20, 2011, 04:47:05 AM
He looked better last year.

just the pic - don t judge by pics only  ;)
Title: Re: Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: geneticmarvel on February 20, 2011, 06:43:52 PM
Biggest calves i've ever seen in person no doubt. He told me hes only been working out for 10 years and I couldn't f#cking believe it, must have been running drugs right from day 1. Very nice, smart well spoken guy, represents Canada really well.
Title: Re: Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Nasty Nate on February 20, 2011, 07:23:27 PM
He was harder at the NY Pro last yr... first pic in the thread looks awesome but his upper chest seems a little flat... not enough of the "shelf"
Title: Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Coach is Back! on February 20, 2011, 07:47:04 PM
He looked better last year.

Looks like he upped the insulin and loaded on it this year. He looks awesome in these pics.
Title: Re: Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Stavios on February 20, 2011, 09:21:38 PM
the lighting was fucking shitty at this show, stop comparing pics with the NY PRO where the lighting is great

everybody looks super hard on the NY PRO pics

Kai, ben, evan etc..

you can't judge by pics only
Title: Re: Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: Ronnie Rep on February 21, 2011, 01:28:47 PM
Needs Arms!
Title: Re: Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: wes on February 21, 2011, 01:52:27 PM
Awesome shots from the NY Pro.
Title: Re: Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!
Post by: affeman on February 21, 2011, 02:34:29 PM
Look at this fucking freak ;D