Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Meso_z on March 11, 2011, 11:21:36 PM

Title: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: Meso_z on March 11, 2011, 11:21:36 PM
 :o
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: theonlyone on March 11, 2011, 11:24:43 PM
 He's looking thin for me. Way overrated.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Skeletor on March 11, 2011, 11:30:40 PM
Wth is this:

(http://s3.postimage.org/89h83amlt/Aust_186_QCZXZOYSVB.jpg)

Too much oil in the delts.

Side "chest":
(http://s3.postimage.org/89hv8thip/Aust_130.jpg)
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Parker on March 11, 2011, 11:51:42 PM
Damn he's got a long ass torso:
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=369261.0;attach=405886;image)
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: g101 on March 11, 2011, 11:59:37 PM
testosterona propa
trenbolona
masterona
equipona
GHona
INSULINA

that's his physique.

 ;D
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Skeletor on March 12, 2011, 12:01:56 AM
And no guru-na.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: closeline on March 12, 2011, 12:06:53 AM
:o

the widest top pro ever!

crazy shoulders
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: g101 on March 12, 2011, 12:09:54 AM
the widest top pro ever!

crazy shoulders

only cuz of GH  ;)
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Parker on March 12, 2011, 12:32:58 AM
the widest top pro ever!

crazy shoulders
Gunter and Dillett could be wider, add Ruhl and Stubbs to that as well...
He has no pop to his physique, and his muscles look "stringy"

sad day, sad day when such a structurally flawed individual is considered a "top" pro.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: claymore on March 12, 2011, 01:14:08 AM
This so called "sport" keeps regressing with each show, how can any sport in the last twenty years fall so far from where it was. I know attendance is higher than twenty years ago and I'm also aware that magazines and supplement sales are far greater, but the physiques showing up to these shows are no where near where they need to be. Kevin Levrone said it best on rxmuscle recently "None of these guys suffer anymore".
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: affeman on March 12, 2011, 02:05:17 AM
He's looking thin for me. Way overrated.

Yeah, he's flattening out already again. For Dennis it seems to be impossible to peak for several shows in a row. Time to end the spring season for him. He can peak only once and that was for the Arnolds, at the Flex he was still smooth and now he's getting flat and thin again.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: 20inch calves on March 12, 2011, 02:07:31 AM
He's looking thin for me. Way overrated.


yeah 5'11 in the 260-270 range is awfully thin ::)
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: affeman on March 12, 2011, 02:19:06 AM

yeah 5'11 in the 260-270 range is awfully thin ::)

Maybe thin is the  wrong word, rather flat than a pancake.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: dyslexic on March 12, 2011, 02:21:44 AM
Damn he's got a long ass torso:


I agree...

(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/wolflongtorso.jpg)
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Dr Dutch on March 12, 2011, 02:29:52 AM
Are calves not required in Australia ?
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Skeletor on March 12, 2011, 02:32:04 AM
Are calves not required in Australia ?

They've been a non-issue for years.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Jaime on March 12, 2011, 03:10:26 AM
Wolf is getting overrated as fuck now, he looks better than ranch and the other midgets, he still looks like a complete mess though.

Zero balance and flat as hell.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: NordicNerd on March 12, 2011, 03:34:26 AM
Wolf is getting overrated as fuck now, he looks better than ranch and the other midgets, he still looks like a complete mess though.

Zero balance and flat as hell.

Wolf looks good. He has a dramatic V-taper and has the sort of physique that would look more appealing to a mainstream audience than that of the oil-injected midget Branch Warren.

NN
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Parker on March 12, 2011, 03:40:11 AM
I agree...

(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/wolflongtorso.jpg)
He's got the Plastic Man thing going on.
"Stretched By God, Blessed By Weider!"
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: wes on March 12, 2011, 05:46:00 AM
Bring back the 90`s type of physique!!  :(
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Ex Coelis on March 12, 2011, 06:01:44 AM
you're all a bunch of fickle pussies
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: dyslexic on March 12, 2011, 07:20:06 AM
you're all a bunch of fickle pussies


What's a "fickle pussy?"


Is that like a pickled pussy, or one that changes all the time?


Pussies!
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Meso_z on March 12, 2011, 10:22:33 AM
 8)

He looks amazing here.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: local hero on March 12, 2011, 10:27:06 AM
at least he's coming in hard again, no gut, what more can he do?
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: lm on March 12, 2011, 10:35:17 AM
Does he have flaws? yes
Is he the best of what's out there currently? In my subjective opinion, yes.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Tito24 on March 12, 2011, 10:38:32 AM
i wish i had his flaws
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: affeman on March 12, 2011, 10:40:19 AM
Def the best Pro poser at the moment. He might now work on his flaws, but definetely on his presentation.

Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: DroppingPlates on March 12, 2011, 10:43:53 AM
Are calves not required in Australia ?
No, they don't have a biking culture like we have
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: The_Leafy_Bug on March 12, 2011, 10:54:26 AM
Alot of jealousy in this thread of Dennis's crazy physique.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: closeline on March 12, 2011, 11:00:33 AM
by far the bets ifbb pro

just one missing thing (calfs)

no other real weakness long torso and high lats aren t always a weak point , because it makes the waist look smaller and the taper a lot more spectacular

a lot of jelous loosers and haters here

why don t jump to a not bb related board?

Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: DroppingPlates on March 12, 2011, 11:12:54 AM
Since Eric Fankhauser only has a great pair of calves, he should donate them
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: AbrahamG on March 12, 2011, 04:56:46 PM
Guys are way too critical of Wolf.  His back is not that bad.  In fact, it's not bad at all.  His Front lat spread and front double bicep shot are the best in the business.  True, his lower back is shallow, but seems to be improving.  While his upper back is better than Jay's and Branches.  His calves suck, yes.  But They looked better so far this year, and they don't look oiled up.  His overall width and taper are unparalleled in the sport. 
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Palpatine Q on March 12, 2011, 05:11:18 PM
i wish i had his flaws

X2

Bunch if nit picking dildos. ...  Parker actually says he has a "terrible structure".......LOLOLOL

If he was black and his name was Hakeem Nicks...Parker would be calling him a future O winner
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: flexingtonsteele on March 12, 2011, 05:29:41 PM
If Wolf adds a few pounds of muscle in his glutes/ham and improves his arnold classic conditioning by a few percent he's gonna be mr.olympia.

And Id much rather see Wolf as Mr.O then an insulin filled Phillip Heath or a poor mans bob chicherello like Evan Centopani.

After Jay retires its Wolfs throne for the taking.
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on March 12, 2011, 05:29:56 PM
Only 10 competitors at this show and 5 of them wouldn't have been good enough to be a PDI pro :-\
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: pellius on March 12, 2011, 05:32:59 PM
X2

Bunch if nit picking dildos. ...  Parker actually says he has a "terrible structure".......LOLOLOL

If he was black and his name was Hakeem Nicks...Parker would be calling him a future O winner

QFT! Damn this is a tough crowd. I think Wolf looks great. LOL @ those who criticize his lower back. He's brought them up a lot and I see thick cords of muscle jutting out. In a video it's one of things on his physique that "pops." Compare him to some of the other top pros like Jay, Kai, Heath and Branch. And his lats aren't any higher then Dexter's and they also pop out. And his quad sweep is out of this world. Something tall guys can't pull off with the exception of Freeman. His wide back and shoulders, narrow flat waist and flaring quads gives him that structure that few have anymore. Only his calves are bad but so are Dexter's.

You arm chair critics are something else.  
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Stavios on March 12, 2011, 05:33:52 PM
X2

Bunch if nit picking dildos. ...  Parker actually says he has a "terrible structure".......LOLOLOL

If he was black and his name was Hakeem Nicks...Parker would be calling him a future O winner

LMAO !!!!!  ;D
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: flexingtonsteele on March 12, 2011, 05:37:23 PM
Only 10 competitors at this show and 5 of them wouldn't have been good enough to be a PDI pro :-\

I think this was the worst lineup in the HISTORY of the ifbb.

2 of these guys were awarded their "pro cards" on the day of the show lol.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Parker on March 12, 2011, 05:41:10 PM
X2

Bunch if nit picking dildos. ...  Parker actually says he has a "terrible structure".......LOLOLOL

If he was black and his name was Hakeem Nicks...Parker would be calling him a future O winner
Nope, he'd still have a shitty structure...99% of top bbers, black and white look like SHIT!
You can turn Wolf into a Unicorn, and he still would be a shitty Unicorn. I call it as I see it, and people don't like that their fan favorite, who is their GWH, sucks pig tits. Sorry, it is what it is. And people are okay with that. They go down the road Okie Dokie style...as long as you take it and don't say shit, they will continue to push inferior physiques down your throats, and you get used to it.
I hated Flex's 2000 look, and I voiced that Cormier should have won. I hated it when Dillett won over Ruhl, and stated Ruhl should have won.
If Wolf adds a few pounds of muscle in his glutes/ham and improves his arnold classic conditioning by a few percent he's gonna be mr.olympia.

And Id much rather see Wolf as Mr.O then an insulin filled Phillip Heath or a poor mans bob chicherello like Evan Centopani.


After Jay retires its Wolfs throne for the taking.
You see this too?
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: jude2 on March 12, 2011, 06:13:59 PM
Wolf looks good. He has a dramatic V-taper and has the sort of physique that would look more appealing to a mainstream audience than that of the oil-injected midget Branch Warren.

NN
Agreed. The problem is we are use to seeing these shorter guys with short torso and wide waist competing, so Wolf looks weird to some, but in fact he is better.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Palpatine Q on March 12, 2011, 06:56:21 PM
Agreed. The problem is we are use to seeing these shorter guys with short torso and wide waist competing, so Wolf looks weird to some, but in fact he is better.

Thank you.  These morons call him shallow and stringy. Why because he doesn't weigh 300 with a 46 inch waist ?

That look SUCKS....morons. I'd rather a guy with 5% less mass but has proportions that shit all over these stuffed sausages. Its not like the guy is small....he's fucking huge
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: 225for70 on March 12, 2011, 07:02:31 PM
Dennis looks great for an IFBB pro..Granted his calves suck really bad..However, the guy is fucking huge and still has a small waist..



The guy is at least 1X uncrowned mr olympia.


Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: pellius on March 12, 2011, 07:05:47 PM
Nope, he'd still have a shitty structure...99% of top bbers, black and white look like SHIT!
You can turn Wolf into a Unicorn, and he still would be a shitty Unicorn. I call it as I see it, and people don't like that their fan favorite, who is their GWH, sucks pig tits. Sorry, it is what it is. And people are okay with that. They go down the road Okie Dokie style...as long as you take it and don't say shit, they will continue to push inferior physiques down your throats, and you get used to it.
I hated Flex's 2000 look, and I voiced that Cormier should have won. I hated it when Dillett won over Ruhl, and stated Ruhl should have won.You see this too?


So who do you think is the best bodybuilder right now?
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: pellius on March 12, 2011, 07:06:47 PM
Agreed. The problem is we are use to seeing these shorter guys with short torso and wide waist competing, so Wolf looks weird to some, but in fact he is better.

This ^^^^^^
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Parker on March 12, 2011, 07:24:38 PM
So who do you think is the best bodybuilder right now?
Unfortunately, it's the broom with arms. Had he competed at the Arnold or Aussie Pro, he would have won...we all know this.

You know, I was never a fan of Orville Burke, didn't like his high lats and I thought he had thick skin, and I thought he was overhyped, he is the same thing as Wolf.

Bbing is only reflective of the larger culture. As quality goes down there, quality goes down in the bbing world. It is what it is.
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: njflex on March 12, 2011, 08:19:34 PM
that's not roland czsurlok in the most muscular.
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: Naggash on March 12, 2011, 09:11:27 PM
I'm sorry but what is wrong with his structure exactly? Tiny waste, wide shoulders. He has a long torso but also long limbs so he doesn't look weird in that aspect.

He has a better X frame than Evan or Heath, what the fuck more do you want?

He looks 1000x better and more impressive in person than these black midgets.
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: Matt C on March 13, 2011, 01:14:45 AM
I'm sorry but what is wrong with his structure exactly? Tiny waste, wide shoulders. He has a long torso but also long limbs so he doesn't look weird in that aspect.

He has a better X frame than Evan or Heath, what the fuck more do you want?

He looks 1000x better and more impressive in person than these black manlets.

LOL!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: closeline on March 13, 2011, 03:34:03 AM
Nope, he'd still have a shitty structure...99% of top bbers, black and white look like SHIT!
You can turn Wolf into a Unicorn, and he still would be a shitty Unicorn. I call it as I see it, and people don't like that their fan favorite, who is their GWH, sucks pig tits. Sorry, it is what it is. And people are okay with that. They go down the road Okie Dokie style...as long as you take it and don't say shit, they will continue to push inferior physiques down your throats, and you get used to it.
I hated Flex's 2000 look, and I voiced that Cormier should have won. I hated it when Dillett won over Ruhl, and stated Ruhl should have won.You see this too?


nobody should read your posts - always worthless bullshit

look at the pic - all the way great frame and structure (as i sad before calfs are the only missing thing, but coleman, dexter missed them also, yates and cutler have no arms what should be more important in bb, all of them have a much worse structure)
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: 99 Bananas on March 13, 2011, 03:42:02 AM
nobody should read your posts - always worthless bullshit

look at the pic - all the way great frame and structure (as i sad before calfs are the only missing thing, but coleman, dexter missed them also, yates and cutler have no arms what should be more important in bb, all of them have a much worse structure)
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XIsVie0is6o/Sbhfncs6XFI/AAAAAAAAACs/ZDNzw_U-j4w/s320/cutler+bodybuilder.jpg)(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2006/flex_sep06cover.jpg)
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: closeline on March 13, 2011, 03:43:04 AM
photoshop or 7yrs ago  ;)
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: pellius on March 13, 2011, 04:47:21 AM
Unfortunately, it's the broom with arms. Had he competed at the Arnold or Aussie Pro, he would have won...we all know this.

You know, I was never a fan of Orville Burke, didn't like his high lats and I thought he had thick skin, and I thought he was overhyped, he is the same thing as Wolf.

Bbing is only reflective of the larger culture. As quality goes down there, quality goes down in the bbing world. It is what it is.

That's funny. I was a fan of Burke's physique. I don't know what's this thing about high lats but when your taller you are going to have a longer torso. The other poster was on point when he pointed out that BB's as a group are short so we are just use to seeing these fireplugs. Burke was around 5'11". I like that long torso look better. It gives a more streamline appearance. When I compare someone like Burke to the top placers at the last Olympia: Jay, Branch, Dex, Phil, I much prefer Burke. Black man even had decent calves. Damn decent. You think Phil or Dex looks better than this?
(http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/8/6/869784.1136254662211.ob.jpg)
(http://www.ironmagazineforums.com/gallery/data/563/orvilleburke.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/148/images/Orville_Burke%20(42).jpg)
(http://www.zonecapone.com/bilder/BURKE.jpg)
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Parker on March 13, 2011, 05:28:12 AM
That's funny. I was a fan of Burke's physique. I don't know what's this thing about high lats but when your taller you are going to have a longer torso. The other poster was on point when he pointed out that BB's as a group are short so we are just use to seeing these fireplugs. Burke was around 5'11". I like that long torso look better. It gives a more streamline appearance. When I compare someone like Burke to the top placers at the last Olympia: Jay, Branch, Dex, Phil, I much prefer Burke. Black man even had decent calves. Damn decent. You think Phil or Dex looks better than this?
(http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/8/6/869784.1136254662211.ob.jpg)
(http://www.ironmagazineforums.com/gallery/data/563/orvilleburke.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/148/images/Orville_Burke%20(42).jpg)
(http://www.zonecapone.com/bilder/BURKE.jpg)
I actually liked Flex's Physique better, and he had smaller waist, with lower lats, like Cedric does now. The high lats give a illusion of a smaller waist due to lack of "space", so visually the waist seems smaller, because the Lats don't go all the way down...
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: closeline on March 13, 2011, 05:38:23 AM
burke s body look like freak bodyparts stiched together by frankenstein

ugly body, lots of oil
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: kiwiol on March 13, 2011, 05:53:47 AM
burke s body look like freak bodyparts stiched together by frankenstein

ugly body, lots of oil

Exactly. He had a sick taper, but zero separation, huge gut, thick skin and was very oddly put together. Not to mention the loads of oil/Synthol in his calves and arms.
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: Naggash on March 13, 2011, 07:05:53 AM
Bourke was not 5"11. Standing next to Tom Prince and other bbers from a few years ago he was roughly the same height.

Freaky ass taper , insane back and chest. Arms were a bit weak though.
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: Ex Coelis on March 13, 2011, 04:52:34 PM
Parker is hopeless

I don't even bother reading his posts anymore
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: pellius on March 13, 2011, 05:00:34 PM
Exactly. He had a sick taper, but zero separation, huge gut, thick skin and was very oddly put together. Not to mention the loads of oil/Synthol in his calves and arms.

Yup, zero separation, huge gut, thick skin and oddly put together. And unlike Jay and Branch (and not to forget Flex), his arms are just dripping with oil. Home boy had some balls stepping on stage looking like that.  ::)

(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/148/images/Orville_Burke%20(42).jpg)
Title: Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
Post by: TrapsMcLats on March 13, 2011, 06:40:20 PM
Vegetable by 40:


(http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/8/6/869784.1136254662211.ob.jpg)
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: Skeletor on March 13, 2011, 06:50:58 PM
(http://www.zonecapone.com/bilder/BURKE.jpg)

Horrible gut.
Title: Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
Post by: MB on March 13, 2011, 07:31:44 PM
Nope, he'd still have a shitty structure...99% of top bbers, black and white look like SHIT!
You can turn Wolf into a Unicorn, and he still would be a shitty Unicorn. I call it as I see it, and people don't like that their fan favorite, who is their GWH, sucks pig tits. Sorry, it is what it is. And people are okay with that. They go down the road Okie Dokie style...as long as you take it and don't say shit, they will continue to push inferior physiques down your throats, and you get used to it.
I hated Flex's 2000 look, and I voiced that Cormier should have won. I hated it when Dillett won over Ruhl, and stated Ruhl should have won.You see this too?
Dennis probably has the best structure of anyone competing today.  Wide shoulders, small waist, good quad sweep.  He's the definition of X-frame.