Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: tonymctones on April 08, 2011, 10:39:27 PM
-
almost twice as many reps...
whats that say about the democrats and reps?
-
More democrats than reps vote against an extension...
hmmmm
whats that say?
240?
-
A GOP push to strip $317 million in federal funding from Planned Parenthood failed. Democrats also turned back Republican attempts to get federal dollars currently set aside for family planning and women's health turned into block grants for states.
They aren't going to put obamacare in the bill either - it'll be its own vote, gee I wonder how taht'll go in the senate lol..........
tony, perhaps you were blinded with love for miss bachmann, in which case i can't blind you. i've said for a week that the dems WANT a shutdown very much, as they'd benefit from it. boehnner said it, dean and reid said it too.
-
interesting. michelle bachmann voted against it. She gave Boehnner the finger on that one.
She's truly a rogue, let's be honest. Palin did fall in line in 2008. This is certainly a time bachmann should be doing so. but she's not! She's voting how she thinks is right.
props. You had Pence and other screaming 'shut er down'
She kept quiet and calmnly voted against the bill.
-
didnt see you start a thread bashing the dems for pushing a govt shut down is all. I though you might have missed it ;)
-
interesting. michelle bachmann voted against it. She gave Boehnner the finger on that one.
She's truly a rogue, let's be honest. Palin did fall in line in 2008. This is certainly a time bachmann should be doing so. but she's not! She's voting how she thinks is right.
props. You had Pence and other screaming 'shut er down'
She kept quiet and calmnly voted against the bill.
I think Bachmann could be on honest candidate. She has only bee in Washington 5 years so she hasn't been corrupted yet. The only issue I have with her is she voted to extend the Patriot Act, which is not a Tea Party position at all.
-
Poor 240 - his dreamboat lib commies are losing.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/52853.html
-
Poor 240 - his dreamboat lib commies are losing.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/52853.html
LOL! #losing.
the tea party amateurs blinked and did was daddy boehnner told them. they caved on the PP issue, and they ended at what, 35, 36 billion? The dems OFFERED 33 billion, and the repubs counter offered with 71 billion.
Glad to see they 'met in the middle' at 36 billion haha.
I knew you'd claim a win no matter what. AMERICA loses that we have such d-bags running the place in both parties. But any repub who says "we won!" after screaming last week it was 71 billion and ending PP or bust... well...
-
LOL! #losing.
the tea party amateurs blinked and did was daddy boehnner told them. they caved on the PP issue, and they ended at what, 35, 36 billion? The dems OFFERED 33 billion, and the repubs counter offered with 71 billion.
Glad to see they 'met in the middle' at 36 billion haha.
I knew you'd claim a win no matter what. AMERICA loses that we have such d-bags running the place in both parties. But any repub who says "we won!" after screaming last week it was 71 billion and ending PP or bust... well...
Not sure given the constant changes, but I think Republicans initially wanted 61 billion at the start. The first two CR's cut 20 billion and this last one I think is 35 or so billion bringing it to 55-56 billion? Fairly close to the 61 billion but correct my numbers if I'm off.
-
LOL! #losing.
the tea party amateurs blinked and did was daddy boehnner told them. they caved on the PP issue, and they ended at what, 35, 36 billion? The dems OFFERED 33 billion, and the repubs counter offered with 71 billion.
Glad to see they 'met in the middle' at 36 billion haha.
I knew you'd claim a win no matter what. AMERICA loses that we have such d-bags running the place in both parties. But any repub who says "we won!" after screaming last week it was 71 billion and ending PP or bust... well...
You are the same pink panty lib screaming that LaQuanda would not get her abortion if the govt shut down!
-
Negotiators capped days of frantic closed-door talks and public recriminations by agreeing on a framework for a package of $38.5 billion in spending cuts covering the rest of the fiscal year, which expires September 30. The budget deal still needs to pass in both houses, with the expectation that lawmakers will approve it and the president will sign it before the short-term funding measure expires.
-
You are the same pink panty lib screaming that LaQuanda would not get her abortion if the govt shut down!
lol name calling now?
-
lol name calling now?
Yes. Deal with it. someone needs to knock some sense into your self claimed "libertarian" skull.
-
Yes. Deal with it. someone needs to knock some sense into your self claimed "libertarian" skull.
sa-weet!
-
sa-weet!
I'm like your big brother - tough love for 240. You need a beating every few months to put you in your place.
-
This Deal is Not Enough [Michele Bachmann]
RedState ^ | April 9, 2011 | Michele Bachmann
This Deal is Not Enough
Posted by Rep. Michele Bachmann
Saturday, April 9th at 12:07PM EDT
The deal of $38 billion in cuts announced early this morning between GOP Leadership and Harry Reid is a pittance compared to the $3.5 trillion+ we are on pace to spend this year alone. Since Republicans took the Majority, I have been vocal about what the American people sent us to Washington to accomplish. As I said in my last RedState post, we must fight over trillions in cuts, we must fight over defunding ObamaCare and we must fight over defunding Planned Parenthood.
I wanted the GOP to fight for more in this week’s negotiations. I wanted them to fight for significant spending cuts before this debt cripples our children and grandchildren like it is crippling our economy right now. I have demonstrated my commitment to these values by voting “no” on past continuing resolutions and I will continue to oppose any spending measure that fails to take up these crucial issues. And rest assured, I will continue to fight for them when the battleground shifts to the debt ceiling and the 2012 budget.
-
bachmann managed to NOT be one of those boners screaming like a fool about shutdown - but her vote will retain her top credibility with the base. smart.
-
bachmann managed to NOT be one of those boners screaming like a fool about shutdown - but her vote will retain her top credibility with the base. smart.
Yes, but what about her vote to extend the patriot act? Is she a supporter of the national security state and big brother?
-
Yes, but what about her vote to extend the patriot act? Is she a supporter of the national security state and big brother?
yep, but that's ancient history and a non-issue to national voters.
bush and obama both supported it.
-
yep, but that's ancient history and a non-issue to national voters.
bush and obama both supported it.
Unfortunately you are right. 90% of the people of this nation probably don't even know what the patriot act entails and only care about current media soundbites to influence their votes.
-
I think 90 percent of the people complaining about the Patriot Act have never read it.
-
I think 90 percent of the people complaining about the Patriot Act have never read it.
I think 90 percent of people who support the Patriot Act have never heard of the 4th Amendment to our Constitution. Of course, like I always say, it is
"Just a damn piece of paper" -GW Bush.
-
Then again, if you are ok with Big Sis Janet Napalitano reading your emails and tapping your phone without a court order than more power to you. I don't want that fat, retarded dike looking at any of my emails, but that is just me.
-
I think 90 percent of people who support the Patriot Act have never heard of the 4th Amendment to our Constitution. Of course, like I always say, it is
"Just a damn piece of paper" -GW Bush.
Which part of the Patriot Act do you have a problem with?
-
bachmann managed to NOT be one of those boners screaming like a fool about shutdown - but her vote will retain her top credibility with the base. smart.
you mean one of those ppl you have never produced a clip or even a quote from?
yea "ill shut down the govt"...
dont worry about the "..." ::)
-
Which part of the Patriot Act do you have a problem with?
The part about warrantless wiretapping, searches without a court order, you know, the 1984 George Orwell stuff.
-
The part about warrantless wiretapping, searches without a court order, you know, the 1984 George Orwell stuff.
Which specific section are you talking about?
-
TITLE II--ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES
Sec. 201. Authority to intercept wire, oral, and electronic communications relating to terrorism.
Sec. 202. Authority to intercept wire, oral, and electronic communications relating to computer fraud and abuse offenses.
Sec. 203. Authority to share criminal investigative information.
Sec. 204. Clarification of intelligence exceptions from limitations on interception and disclosure of wire, oral, and electronic communications.
Sec. 205. Employment of translators by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Sec. 206. Roving surveillance authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
Sec. 207. Duration of FISA surveillance of non-United States persons who are agents of a foreign power.
Sec. 208. Designation of judges.
Sec. 209. Seizure of voice-mail messages pursuant to warrants.
Sec. 210. Scope of subpoenas for records of electronic communications.
Sec. 211. Clarification of scope.
Sec. 212. Emergency disclosure of electronic communications to protect life and limb.
Sec. 213. Authority for delaying notice of the execution of a warrant.
Sec. 214. Pen register and trap and trace authority under FISA.
Sec. 215. Access to records and other items under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Sec. 216. Modification of authorities relating to use of pen registers and trap and trace devices.
Sec. 217. Interception of computer trespasser communications.
Sec. 218. Foreign intelligence information.
Sec. 219. Single-jurisdiction search warrants for terrorism.
Sec. 220. Nationwide service of search warrants for electronic evidence.
Sec. 221. Trade sanctions.
Sec. 222. Assistance to law enforcement agencies.
Sec. 223. Civil liability for certain unauthorized disclosures.
Sec. 224. Sunset.
Sec. 225. Immunity for compliance with FISA wiretap.
-
TITLE II--ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES
Sec. 201. Authority to intercept wire, oral, and electronic communications relating to terrorism.
Sec. 202. Authority to intercept wire, oral, and electronic communications relating to computer fraud and abuse offenses.
Sec. 203. Authority to share criminal investigative information.
Sec. 204. Clarification of intelligence exceptions from limitations on interception and disclosure of wire, oral, and electronic communications.
Sec. 205. Employment of translators by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Sec. 206. Roving surveillance authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
Sec. 207. Duration of FISA surveillance of non-United States persons who are agents of a foreign power.
Sec. 208. Designation of judges.
Sec. 209. Seizure of voice-mail messages pursuant to warrants.
Sec. 210. Scope of subpoenas for records of electronic communications.
Sec. 211. Clarification of scope.
Sec. 212. Emergency disclosure of electronic communications to protect life and limb.
Sec. 213. Authority for delaying notice of the execution of a warrant.
Sec. 214. Pen register and trap and trace authority under FISA.
Sec. 215. Access to records and other items under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Sec. 216. Modification of authorities relating to use of pen registers and trap and trace devices.
Sec. 217. Interception of computer trespasser communications.
Sec. 218. Foreign intelligence information.
Sec. 219. Single-jurisdiction search warrants for terrorism.
Sec. 220. Nationwide service of search warrants for electronic evidence.
Sec. 221. Trade sanctions.
Sec. 222. Assistance to law enforcement agencies.
Sec. 223. Civil liability for certain unauthorized disclosures.
Sec. 224. Sunset.
Sec. 225. Immunity for compliance with FISA wiretap.
Which section? I'd like to read it so I can better understand your concerns.