Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: closeline on April 25, 2011, 02:27:13 AM
-
must be bigger than Heath s ::)
-
must be bigger than Heath s ::)
Who is this guy? Does he compete?
-
21.7 inches
:D
-
21.7 inches
:D
seriously?
if that s true , nobody else ever touched the 19 inch mark in contest shape
-
seriously?
if that s true , nobody else ever touched the 19 inch mark in contest shape
Unless you actualy wrap a tape around it yourself or are there when it happens dont beleive the numbers chucked around - they all bullshit , its nothing new.
A ripped to the bone 20 plus inch arm is huge and will look even bigger than it is because its lean , same as a sliced 18-19 inch arm can look 20 inches
-
21.7 - 22 inch shredded arm with a crazy peak
not some bloofy fat 22 inch arm
-
even if heaths arms are bigger , they look fake. rons arms are rockhard solid muscle
-
40inch as so many half is size claim 20
-
Looks more "real" than Heath's.
-
must be bigger than Heath s ::)
N E V E R! But nice try.
(http://www.nowhavefun.com/celebritypictures/d/120828-1/15+Phil+Heath+foto.jpg)
-
23 inches, i watched him get measured!
-
Ronnie's arms have been bigger than 21.7-22 inches...one measurement doesn't mean that his arms have been bigger
Phil Heath in slight offseason mode with Robert B
[/youtube]
-
Ronnie's arms have been bigger than 21.7-22 inches...one measurement doesn't mean that his arms have been bigger
Phil Heath in slight offseason mode with Robert B
[/youtube]
Burneikas guns are insane (not shape but size-wise), maybe even the biggest in the pro ranks. This guy makes Ruhl's arms look like toothpicks.
-
N E V E R! But nice try.
(http://www.nowhavefun.com/celebritypictures/d/120828-1/15+Phil+Heath+foto.jpg)
colemans armsa lot bigger than heaths at his peak
phil arms are a big illusion being narrow and having a lacking chest helps
see heath tand dareem arm pic
dareem is a bantam weight to coleman
so no heaths arms are nowhere close
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach%3Btopic=243297.0%3Battach=283423%3Bimage)
-
i think there are pros out there with bigger arms than heah its his arm shape that casts the illusion
-
That's from Heath's first or second show when he was like 215 or something, he blew up after that and his tris went nuts and massive.
Anyone got any pics of Burneka onstage against some good pros?
-
Ronnie's arms in his prime would make phil look stupid. I have seen them both up close. Phil's are round as shit, but ronnie's were just...stupid big. Ridiculous doesn't even begin to sum it up.
-
23 inches, i watched him get measured!
I sucked his cock... It was 8.5"... and VERY vascular.
-
Phil has great detail and the sweep of his tris is what really gives that illusion, Levrone was the same way, but stand Levrone next to Coleman and his arms shrunk away like two little scared balls retreating into the scrotum.
To this day, haven't seen a more ridiculous arm shot:
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/SxBaaiDRO6I/AAAAAAAAC7U/vB5RbjGmwa8/s1600/Ronnie+coleman+2+at+2003+Mr.+Olympia.JPG)
-
I sucked his cock... It was 8.5"... and VERY vascular.
Hi FatAlice
-
Phil has great detail and the sweep of his tris is what really gives that illusion, Levrone was the same way, but stand Levrone next to Coleman and his arms shrunk away like two little scared balls retreating into the scrotum.
Yeah? I'd say Colemans non-existant triceps hurt him a lil bit standing next to Kevin. ::)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=374063.0;attach=411060;image)
-
no one made levrones arms look small, at any show, at any time,,, some of the thickest triceps ever
-
Unless you actualy wrap a tape around it yourself or are there when it happens dont beleive the numbers chucked around - they all bullshit , its nothing new.
A ripped to the bone 20 plus inch arm is huge and will look even bigger than it is because its lean , same as a sliced 18-19 inch arm can look 20 inches
Exactly. End of thread.
-
Yeah? I'd say Colemans non-existant triceps hurt him a lil bit standing next to Kevin. ::)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=374063.0;attach=411060;image)
That's what: 2002?
Coleman's triceps faltered after 2001. 'til then they were actually very good as his arms didn't look out of balance though he had the best bis in the biz by far. Then they faded into oblivion, that's true.
-
Phil has great detail and the sweep of his tris is what really gives that illusion, Levrone was the same way, but stand Levrone next to Coleman and his arms shrunk away like two little scared balls retreating into the scrotum.
hahahahahaha
BOOOOOOM
levrowned
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=37555&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=40732&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=41822&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=41816&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/SwUlw_e8NBI/AAAAAAAACY4/EjezFV96Qwg/s1600/Jay+Cutler,+Ronnie+Coleman,+Kevin+Levrone+at+the+2001+Mr.+Olympia2.JPG)
-
levrones closer to the cam in all those pics, whats your point?
-
HEATH and LEVRONE look big standing alone because of their narrowness, but next to coleman thei are TWO steps behind (not to say look really small)
Coleman s arms at 290lbs must be 2-3inch bigger at least than heath an levrone at their max. 240lbs
same with levrones so called best shoulders
coleman s are twice as big
-
and look at the lenght of the armes on the last pic above
Levrone is all illusion via being narrow and havin so short limbs
coleman s forarm has almost the size of levrones bis and tris but is 30 percent longer
another insane armpic of unparalleld coleman (at close to 300lbs, while heath still trying hard to get to the 240lbs)
-
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=41130&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Boom
-
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=41130&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Boom
correct, keving can t even keep up with flex (esiclene tris vs. synthol bis and tris)
-
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46634)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46635)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46636)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46637)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46639)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46640)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46641)
-
correct, keving can t even keep up with flex (esiclene tris vs. synthol bis and tris)
Levrone was pretty much done after the '97 O' (where he was kind of screwed). Got two runner-up gifts with half a body missing in '00 and '02.
-
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46634)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46635)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46636)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46637)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46639)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46640)
(http://forum.steelfactor.ru/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=46641)
holy shit
left tri was already injured but right arm is 4ich above the rest
-
...
-
HEATH and LEVRONE look big standing alone because of their narrowness, but next to coleman thei are TWO steps behind (not to say look really small)
Coleman s arms at 290lbs must be 2-3inch bigger at least than heath an levrone at their max. 240lbs
same with levrones so called best shoulders
coleman s are twice as big
whilst your method has some merit for gauging something interesting, why not prove it?
there appears to be some 12% difference in the 2 dimensional width of the arms in those comparison pics, but there's nothing accounting for thickness...so its not conclusive.
still, IF the thicknesses were the same in proportion, then coleman's arm is 12% greater in diameter than levrone's. IF coleman's arm is 23" then, assuming a perfect circle to represent the arm, and we all remember our circle formula, then coleman's arm at 23" = pi * D. So D- for this analysis is 7.3". Now we know D, then levrone's is 0.88* 7.3" = 6.44". Which means that Levrone's circumference is 20.5"
of more interest is the ratio of arm size to height... smaller absolute arm measurement looks more impressive on shorter guys. , lets say, coleman at 6' tall- or whatever he is, sports 23" guns. thats 0.32" or arm per inch of height. Lee Priest's 21"arms at 5'3" is 0.33" of arm per inch of height..and they look massive!
im not trying to get the exact numbers for these..just trying to make a point. as the arm to height measurement is such small numbers, three digits is going to be required.
-
...
matching head size doesnt work...you are then scaling the image.
-
whilst your method has some merit for gauging something interesting, why not prove it?
there appears to be some 12% difference in the 2 dimensional width of the arms in those comparison pics, but there's nothing accounting for thickness...so its not conclusive.
still, IF the thicknesses were the same in proportion, then coleman's arm is 12% greater in diameter than levrone's. IF coleman's arm is 23" then, assuming a perfect circle to represent the arm, and we all remember our circle formula, then coleman's arm at 23" = pi * D. So D- for this analysis is 7.3". Now we know D, then levrone's is 0.88* 7.3" = 6.44". Which means that Levrone's circumference is 20.5"
of more interest is the ratio of arm size to height... smaller absolute arm measurement looks more impressive on shorter guys. , lets say, coleman at 6' tall- or whatever he is, sports 23" guns. thats 0.32" or arm per inch of height. Lee Priest's 21"arms at 5'3" is 0.33" of arm per inch of height..and they look massive!
im not trying to get the exact numbers for these..just trying to make a point. as the arm to height measurement is such small numbers, three digits is going to be required.
good points
-
matching head size doesnt work...you are then scaling the image.
matching armsize would means phil heath looking like a bubble had ;)
-
(http://i51.tinypic.com/wsrbyv.jpg)
-
coleman had 22 inch arms ripped to pieces
Lee priest 20 - 21 inch arm he posted had no detail whatsoever compared to coleman
-
liar priest seems to be manipulating the tape
:D
(http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr149/massturbater/attachment-107.jpg)
Nowhere even close to coleman in terms of conditioning
-
Phil has great detail and the sweep of his tris is what really gives that illusion, Levrone was the same way, but stand Levrone next to Coleman and his arms shrunk away like two little scared balls retreating into the scrotum.
To this day, haven't seen a more ridiculous arm shot:
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/SxBaaiDRO6I/AAAAAAAAC7U/vB5RbjGmwa8/s1600/Ronnie+coleman+2+at+2003+Mr.+Olympia.JPG)
That pic never fails to impress me, no wammter how many times i see it.
I remember a guy i know telling me how he used to hit the waits hard and ended up with massive arms. To directly quote him " i could hardly brush my teeth my arms were that big". ;D
-
Exactly. End of thread.
Agreed - Most arms are much smaller than they look. Arnold's were measured once on public (offseason ) and were only around 19" !!
-
(http://i51.tinypic.com/wsrbyv.jpg)
Scary picture haha.
-
even if heaths arms are bigger , they look fake. rons arms are rockhard solid muscle
X2.
Heath's arms look SO FAKE ..can't even explain why....
WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
-
HEATH and LEVRONE look big standing alone because of their narrowness, but next to coleman thei are TWO steps behind (not to say look really small)
Coleman s arms at 290lbs must be 2-3inch bigger at least than heath an levrone at their max. 240lbs
same with levrones so called best shoulders
coleman s are twice as big
Haha, the "two-finger pistol-point side triceps" should be a new mandatory.