Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on May 26, 2011, 03:29:50 PM
-
:D
-
Yeah, I was suprised to see him say that too. I believe that there is probably some validity to global warming as well, but I definitely wouldn't come out and say it if I was an up and coming Republican.
-
All the data shows we are now cooling if anything.
-
I see you dont like the new mods rule of posting a link?
-
All the data shows we are now cooling if anything.
Do you have a link? I'm not disagreeing with you but am just curious.
-
I'm on my phone. Ill post it tommorow.
-
Global warming is real
However cutting back on fossil fuels is not the way to fix it, way to expensive
-
Global warming is not real..
We had over 100 inches of snow here in CT this year...
Why do you think they changed the name of Global warming to Climate change?
-
Okay the impact from CO2 on our atmosphere is real then
However cutiing fossil fuels is way to expensive and not the right way to fix the issues it causes
-
You can't regulate the sun. Sometimes the sun throws a little more radiation our way, sometimes it doesn't. To think that man has an impact on global temperatures is pretty arrogant. How do you explain temperature increases on Mars and Jupiter?
-
Okay the impact from CO2 on our atmosphere is real then
However cutiing fossil fuels is way to expensive and not the right way to fix the issues it causes
What about climategate?
-
What about it?
-
What about it?
Well considering the fact that there's zero real science that supports the man made global warming theory..Only Pseudoscience and doctored data exists at this point in time..
-
LOL!! Now a blind eye will be turned to climategate. Climategate proved that some of the most important data used to come up with the "greenhouse effect" aka "global warming" aka "climate change" theory was either manipulated or absolutely wrong.
This is the biggest scam being perpetuated today.
-
climategate proved nothing of the sorts. It proved some scientists were idiots and talked about discrediting other studies which is both ethically work but morally too. In no way shape or form did it prove they were using phony science in their studies and in no way shape or form did it discredit the work of thousands of scientists proving climate change is happening. The whole 'trick' nonsense was taken so far out of context it wasn't funny.
To me the most disturbing case was the Indian scientist who purposely predicted the Himalayan ice melt at a far quicker rate to receive more funds. That was a sad day for science as a whole. However, that does not and can not discredit years of work by brilliant scientists proving beyond reasonable doubt that carbon emissions are pushing up towards a tipping point whereby weather changes can and will become much more destructive.
-
Nine committees investigated the allegations and published reports detailing their findings. Climate scientists were criticized for their disorganized methods, bunker mentality and lack of transparency, but none of the inquiries found evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct
-
Global cooling is real
-
the 9/11 commission investigated the allegations and published reports detailing their findings. Climate scientists were criticized for their disorganized methods, bunker mentality and lack of transparency, but none of the inquiries found evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct
Fixed, no wonder they didn't find ANY fraud or scientific misconduct