Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on July 11, 2011, 04:18:44 AM

Title: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 11, 2011, 04:18:44 AM
in general who had a better physique??..

sure ruhl had a better career but imo jux is genetically more gifted (shape wise) but he just never came in a great condition as ruhl did!!..

what do you see??..
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Sam on July 11, 2011, 04:21:43 AM
Who is Raul?
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: d0nny2600 on July 11, 2011, 04:26:54 AM
Who is Raul?
Towelhead spelling for Rühl
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on July 11, 2011, 04:28:04 AM
Who is Raul?

about what you are talking i cant get you? ;D

you had to quote it :P
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: gh15 on July 11, 2011, 04:40:21 AM
marcus,, was and is a freak but also took it to the utmost extremities ever imagined,,done it all


gh15 approved
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Skeletor on July 11, 2011, 07:03:07 AM
Ruhl.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Nirvana on July 11, 2011, 07:04:09 AM

Fucks
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: BayGBM on July 11, 2011, 08:25:06 AM
in general who had a better physique??..

sure ruhl had a better career but imo jux is genetically more gifted (shape wise) but he just never came in a great condition as ruhl did!!..

what do you see??..

Obviously, we are talking shades of grey here, but Ruhl is tier 2, Fux is tier 1! :P
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: oderus on July 11, 2011, 03:31:28 PM
marcus,, was and is a freak but also took it to the utmost extremities ever imagined,,done it all


gh15 approved
not as  far as munzer
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Swede! on July 11, 2011, 03:39:11 PM
marcus,, was and is a freak but also took it to the utmost extremities ever imagined,,done it all


gh15 approved

I remember ruhl taking some time of from competing a few years back to try and have a kid with simone. but that didnt pan out obviously, you thinkt hat played a role? =(
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Otis B Driftwood on July 11, 2011, 03:45:57 PM
marcus,, was and is a freak but also took it to the utmost extremities ever imagined,,done it all


gh15 approved


gee sir, you must have finished your Rosetta Stone English CD because this post reads much more eloquently then your usual ones.  ;)
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: The_Iron_Disciple on July 11, 2011, 04:27:10 PM
Ruhl. 2002 NOC. End of thread ! Next !
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: yates fan on July 11, 2011, 04:52:30 PM
ruhl came in contest shape more often,although fux had a better back.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: OptimusPrime1980 on July 11, 2011, 06:12:43 PM
marcus,, was and is a freak but also took it to the utmost extremities ever imagined,,done it all


gh15 approved
why is it that he is falling apart now?
the weird chest thing..... atrophie
ronnie has it to, his whole left side /lat/arm
they say nerve damage due to herniated discs, but why did the bb of the 80"s did not have these problems?

i think they abused soooo much the body eventually falls apart somewhat...
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Rami on July 11, 2011, 06:22:22 PM
marcus,, was and is a freak but also took it to the utmost extremities ever imagined,,done it all


gh15 approved

expand on this, I'm sure it wasn't that bad
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: abijahmaniaco on July 11, 2011, 11:34:14 PM
in the 90's he had an incredible physique. now he's just wrecked by synthol and terrible distended belly.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: AbrahamG on July 11, 2011, 11:36:59 PM
I'd say it's a tie.  We'll have to go to the Cock to determine the winner.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: 20inch calves on July 12, 2011, 12:45:05 AM
marcus,, was and is a freak but also took it to the utmost extremities ever imagined,,done it all


gh15 approved


do you really think he took more then other top pros. i always wonder this when i see his videos. sometimes he looks cartoonish.  give an example what did he do different then anyone else
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Dipadidu on July 12, 2011, 12:48:48 AM
in 2002 he had an incredible physique. now he's just wrecked by torn muscles and polumbuism.
fixed
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Tito24 on July 12, 2011, 01:23:01 AM
yes i think its safe to say marcus did a cycle or two.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: OptimusPrime1980 on July 12, 2011, 09:03:18 AM
yes i think its safe to say marcus did a cycle or two.
lol.. no man...
he did only one cycle... still has not finished it ..... ;D
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: tommywishbone on July 12, 2011, 09:38:27 AM
Fux. Ruhl ruined it with oil.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: _bruce_ on July 12, 2011, 09:53:27 AM
Fux by a landmile.
Marcus looked flat when he turned to the side -> especially arm-wise.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: local hero on July 12, 2011, 10:13:25 AM
fux 95/96 was awesome and looked as tho he'd end up a top 3 or higher, he actualy had a great structure and probly was the widest bodybuilder at the time, but it all went down hill after that...


Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Tito24 on July 12, 2011, 10:34:37 AM
fux 95/96 was awesome and looked as tho he'd end up a top 3 or higher, he actualy had a great structure and probly was the widest bodybuilder at the time, but it all went dan hill after that...




 :-\
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: StuartR on July 12, 2011, 10:37:01 AM
marcus,, was and is a freak but also took it to the utmost extremities ever imagined,,done it all


gh15 approved

hi markus
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: apply85 on July 12, 2011, 04:01:29 PM
How did it go down hill? What happened to Fux?
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: kiwiol on July 12, 2011, 04:06:33 PM
How did it go down hill? What happened to Fux?

He was doing a photoshoot for FLEX, squatting 675 lb inside a power rack and tore both his quads when he couldn't control the weight.

(http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/4849/jpfuxuv9.jpg)

Fux was bigger than Marcus with a much better structure and was just as freaky. Marcus has a better track record because Fux never got it together on stage in those few contests he competed in.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: apply85 on July 12, 2011, 04:24:01 PM
Just looked up the original article. I actually read the article a long time ago. You think that happened because of winstrol?
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: whitewidow on July 12, 2011, 04:24:26 PM
Ruhl tore a lat. I think thats why he looks funky these days. It was pretty nasty tear. fux is just a beast. I think marcus definately used more juice and other secret weapons then fux did. I dont see any synthol in fux. back then the cycles were not as crazy and the drugs were stronger. seems there are more bodybuilders using underground steroids and new weird drugs. The first time I ssaw ruhl I thought he looked like a science project. id give it to fux for these reasons. He looks like he could get way more rock hard then ruhl.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: dyslexic on July 12, 2011, 04:51:57 PM

gee sir, you must have finished your Rosetta Stone English CD because this post reads much more eloquently then your usual ones.  ;)


It's his alternate personality. No worries.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: Big N on July 12, 2011, 05:47:17 PM
Ruhl, always been a fan of his. He has a sense of humor and he's still in the game.
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: 20inch calves on July 12, 2011, 09:20:37 PM
Ruhl tore a lat. I think thats why he looks funky these days. It was pretty nasty tear. fux is just a beast. I think marcus definately used more juice and other secret weapons then fux did. I dont see any synthol in fux. back then the cycles were not as crazy and the drugs were stronger. seems there are more bodybuilders using underground steroids and new weird drugs. The first time I ssaw ruhl I thought he looked like a science project. id give it to fux for these reasons. He looks like he could get way more rock hard then ruhl.


not true. there is a video of fux doing preacher curls and you can see the bruising from where he injected into his biceps. i know the late trevor smith talked about it and claimed that it was synthol
Title: Re: Mass Monsters Comparision (Fux vs. Ruhl)!!..
Post by: littleboyblue on July 12, 2011, 09:27:09 PM
fux 95/96 was awesome and looked as tho he'd end up a top 3 or higher, he actualy had a great structure and probly was the widest bodybuilder at the time, but it all went down hill after that...



... you're right, he did look awesome.  Remember seeing him train in Golds and when he would walk by it was like a building moving.  He was awesome, he was huge.  I saw Ruhl for the first time in person in Golds in '99 and he hadn't yet "mutated" into the synthol freak that we know him as.  He wasn't near as big as he is in the videos.